Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1995 Apr 11;23(7):1252–1259. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.7.1252

Photoaffinity approaches to determining the sequence selectivities of DNA-small molecule interactions: actinomycin D and ethidium.

G A Marsch 1, D E Graves 1, R L Rill 1
PMCID: PMC306839  PMID: 7739904

Abstract

The DNA photoaffinity ligands, 7-azidoactinomycin D and 8-azidoethidium, form DNA adducts that cause chain cleavage upon treatment with piperidine. Chemical DNA sequencing techniques were used to detect covalent binding. The relative preferences for modifications of all possible sites defined by a base pair step (e.g. GC) were determined within all quartet contexts such as (IGCJ). These preferences are described in terms of 'effective site occupations', which express the ability of a ligand to covalently modify some base in the binding site. Ideally, the effective site occupations measured for photoaffinity agents can also be related to site-specific, non-covalent association constants of the ligand. The sites most reactive with 7-azidoactinomycin D were those preferred for non-covalent binding of unsubstituted actinomycin D. GC sites were most reactive, but next-nearest neighbors exerted significant influences on reactivity. GC sites in 5'-(pyrimidine)GC(purine)-3' contexts, particularly TGCA, were most reactive, while reactivity was strongly suppressed for GC sites with a 5'-flanking G, or a 3'-flanking C. High reactivities were also observed for bases in the first (5') GG steps in TGGT, TGGG and TGGGT sequences recently shown to bind actinomycin D with high affinity. Pyrimidine-3',5'-purine steps and GG steps flanked by a T were most preferred by 8-azidoethidium, in agreement with the behavior of unsubstituted ethidium. The good correspondence between expected and observed covalent binding preferences of these two azide analogs demonstrates that photoaffinity labeling can identify highly preferred sites of non-covalent DNA binding by small molecules.

Full text

PDF
1252

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aivasashvilli V. A., Beabealashvilli R. S. Sequence-specific inhibition of RNA elongation by actinomycin D. FEBS Lett. 1983 Aug 22;160(1-2):124–128. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(83)80950-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baguley B. C., Falkenhaug E. M. The interaction of ethidium with synthetic double-stranded polynucleotides at low ionic strength. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Jan;5(1):161–171. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey S. A., Graves D. E., Rill R. Binding of actinomycin D to the T(G)nT motif of double-stranded DNA: determination of the guanine requirement in nonclassical, non-GpC binding sites. Biochemistry. 1994 Sep 27;33(38):11493–11500. doi: 10.1021/bi00204a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailey S. A., Graves D. E., Rill R., Marsch G. Influence of DNA base sequence on the binding energetics of actinomycin D. Biochemistry. 1993 Jun 8;32(22):5881–5887. doi: 10.1021/bi00073a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bailey S. A., Graves D. E., Rill R., Marsch G. Influence of DNA base sequence on the binding energetics of actinomycin D. Biochemistry. 1993 Jun 8;32(22):5881–5887. doi: 10.1021/bi00073a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayley H., Knowles J. R. Photoaffinity labeling. Methods Enzymol. 1977;46:69–114. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(77)46012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berg O. G., von Hippel P. H. Selection of DNA binding sites by regulatory proteins. Statistical-mechanical theory and application to operators and promoters. J Mol Biol. 1987 Feb 20;193(4):723–750. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90354-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boles T. C., Hogan M. E. High-resolution mapping of carcinogen binding sites on DNA. Biochemistry. 1986 May 20;25(10):3039–3043. doi: 10.1021/bi00358a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boles T. C., Hogan M. E. Site-specific carcinogen binding to DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Sep;81(18):5623–5627. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.18.5623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cantor C. R., Warshaw M. M., Shapiro H. Oligonucleotide interactions. 3. Circular dichroism studies of the conformation of deoxyoligonucleotides. Biopolymers. 1970;9(9):1059–1077. doi: 10.1002/bip.1970.360090909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chandrasekaran S., Krishnamoorthy C. R., Jones R. L., Smith J. C., Wilson W. D. Stopped-flow kinetic, 1H, and 31P NMR analysis of the intercalation of ethidium with poly d(G-C) X d(G-C). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1984 Jul 31;122(2):804–809. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(84)80105-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen F. M. Observation of an anomalously slow association kinetics in the binding of actinomycin D to d(CATGGCCATG). Biochemistry. 1990 Aug 21;29(33):7684–7690. doi: 10.1021/bi00485a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chiao Y. C., Krugh T. R. Actinomycin D complexes with oligonucleotides as models for the binding of the drug to DNA. Paramagnetic induced relaxation experiments on drug-nucleic acid complexes. Biochemistry. 1977 Feb 22;16(4):747–755. doi: 10.1021/bi00623a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dannelley J. M., Boyce L., Gaubatz J. W. Efficiency of photoaffinity labeling DNA homopolymers and copolymers with ethidium monoazide. Photochem Photobiol. 1986 Jan;43(1):7–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1986.tb05584.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Davanloo P., Crothers D. M. Kinetic studies of drug-dinucleotide complexes. Biochemistry. 1976 Nov 30;15(24):5299–5305. doi: 10.1021/bi00669a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox K. R., Waring M. J. DNA structural variations produced by actinomycin and distamycin as revealed by DNAase I footprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Dec 21;12(24):9271–9285. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.24.9271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fox K. R., Waring M. J. Footprinting reveals that nogalamycin and actinomycin shuffle between DNA binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Mar 11;14(5):2001–2014. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.5.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Frederick C. A., Williams L. D., Ughetto G., van der Marel G. A., van Boom J. H., Rich A., Wang A. H. Structural comparison of anticancer drug-DNA complexes: adriamycin and daunomycin. Biochemistry. 1990 Mar 13;29(10):2538–2549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Garland F., Graves D. E., Yielding L. W., Cheung H. C. Comparative studies of the binding of ethidium bromide and its photoreactive analogues to nucleic acids by fluorescence and rapid kinetics. Biochemistry. 1980 Jul 8;19(14):3221–3226. doi: 10.1021/bi00555a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Goodisman J., Dabrowiak J. C. Structural changes and enhancements in DNase I footprinting experiments. Biochemistry. 1992 Feb 4;31(4):1058–1064. doi: 10.1021/bi00119a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Goodisman J., Rehfuss R., Ward B., Dabrowiak J. C. Site-specific binding constants for actinomycin D on DNA determined from footprinting studies. Biochemistry. 1992 Feb 4;31(4):1046–1058. doi: 10.1021/bi00119a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Goodsell D. S., Kopka M. L., Cascio D., Dickerson R. E. Crystal structure of CATGGCCATG and its implications for A-tract bending models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 1;90(7):2930–2934. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.7.2930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Graves D. E., Wadkins R. M. 7-Azidoactinomycin D: a novel probe for examining actinomycin D-DNA interactions. J Biol Chem. 1989 May 5;264(13):7262–7266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Graves D. E., Watkins C. L., Yielding L. W. Ethidium bromide and its photoreactive analogues: spectroscopic analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid binding properties. Biochemistry. 1981 Mar 31;20(7):1887–1892. doi: 10.1021/bi00510a026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Graves D. E., Yielding L. W., Watkins C. L., Yielding K. L. Synthesis, separation and characterization of the mono- and diazide analogs of ethidium bromide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1977 Nov 2;479(1):98–104. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(77)90129-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Huang Y. Q., Rehfuss R. P., LaPlante S. R., Boudreau E., Borer P. N., Lane M. J. Actinomycin D induced DNase I cleavage enhancement caused by sequence specific propagation of an altered DNA structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Dec 9;16(23):11125–11139. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.23.11125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kamitori S., Takusagawa F. Crystal structure of the 2:1 complex between d(GAAGCTTC) and the anticancer drug actinomycin D. J Mol Biol. 1992 May 20;225(2):445–456. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90931-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kang C., Zhang X., Ratliff R., Moyzis R., Rich A. Crystal structure of four-stranded Oxytricha telomeric DNA. Nature. 1992 Mar 12;356(6365):126–131. doi: 10.1038/356126a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kastrup R. V., Young M. A., Krugh T. R. Ethidium bromide complexes with self-complementary deoxytetranucleotides. Demonstration and discussion of sequence preferences in the intercalative binding of ethidium bromide. Biochemistry. 1978 Nov 14;17(23):4855–4865. doi: 10.1021/bi00616a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krugh T. R., Reinhardt C. G. Evidence for sequence preferences in the intercalative binding of ethidium bromide to dinucleoside monophosphates. J Mol Biol. 1975 Sep 15;97(2):133–162. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lipanov A., Kopka M. L., Kaczor-Grzeskowiak M., Quintana J., Dickerson R. E. Structure of the B-DNA decamer C-C-A-A-C-I-T-T-G-G in two different space groups: conformational flexibility of B-DNA. Biochemistry. 1993 Feb 9;32(5):1373–1389. doi: 10.1021/bi00056a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu X., Chen H., Patel D. J. Solution structure of actinomycin-DNA complexes: drug intercalation at isolated G-C sites. J Biomol NMR. 1991 Nov;1(4):323–347. doi: 10.1007/BF02192858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Macgregor R. B., Jr, Clegg R. M., Jovin T. M. Pressure-jump study of the kinetics of ethidium bromide binding to DNA. Biochemistry. 1985 Sep 24;24(20):5503–5510. doi: 10.1021/bi00341a034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Maxam A. M., Gilbert W. Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):499–560. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(80)65059-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Müller W., Crothers D. M. Studies of the binding of actinomycin and related compounds to DNA. J Mol Biol. 1968 Jul 28;35(2):251–290. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(68)80024-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Müller W., Crothers D. M. Studies of the binding of actinomycin and related compounds to DNA. J Mol Biol. 1968 Jul 28;35(2):251–290. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(68)80024-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nielsen P. E. Chemical and photochemical probing of DNA complexes. J Mol Recognit. 1990 Feb;3(1):1–25. doi: 10.1002/jmr.300030102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Patel D. J., Canuel L. L. Ethidium bromide-(dC-dG-dC-dG)2 complex in solution: intercalation and sequence specificity of drug binding at the tetranucleotide duplex level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Oct;73(10):3343–3347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.10.3343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Reinhardt C. G., Krugh T. R. A comparative study of ethidium bromide complexes with dinucleotides and DNA: direct evidence for intercalation and nucleic acid sequence preferences. Biochemistry. 1978 Nov 14;17(23):4845–4854. doi: 10.1021/bi00616a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Reinhardt C. G., Krugh T. R. Phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance studies of actinomycin D, ethidium bromide, and 9-aminoacridine complexes with dinucleotides. Biochemistry. 1977 Jun 28;16(13):2890–2895. doi: 10.1021/bi00632a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rill R. L., Marsch G. A., Graves D. E. 7-Azido-actinomycin D: a photoaffinity probe of the sequence specificity of DNA binding by actinomycin D. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1989 Dec;7(3):591–605. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1989.10508509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rill R. L., Marsch G. A. Sequence preferences of covalent DNA binding by anti-(+)- and anti-(-)-benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxides. Biochemistry. 1990 Jun 26;29(25):6050–6058. doi: 10.1021/bi00477a024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sigman D. S., Chen C. H. Chemical nucleases: new reagents in molecular biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:207–236. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.001231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Snyder J. G., Hartman N. G., D'Estantoit B. L., Kennard O., Remeta D. P., Breslauer K. J. Binding of actinomycin D to DNA: evidence for a nonclassical high-affinity binding mode that does not require GpC sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Jun;86(11):3968–3972. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.11.3968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sobell H. M., Jain S. C. Stereochemistry of actinomycin binding to DNA. II. Detailed molecular model of actinomycin-DNA complex and its implications. J Mol Biol. 1972 Jul 14;68(1):21–34. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(72)90259-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sures I., Lowry J., Kedes L. H. The DNA sequence of sea urchin (S. purpuratus) H2A, H2B and H3 histone coding and spacer regions. Cell. 1978 Nov;15(3):1033–1044. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(78)90287-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tullius T. D. Physical studies of protein-DNA complexes by footprinting. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1989;18:213–237. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.18.060189.001241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Van Dyke M. W., Dervan P. B. Methidiumpropyl-EDTA.Fe(II) and DNase I footprinting report different small molecule binding site sizes on DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1983 Aug 25;11(16):5555–5567. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.16.5555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Veal J. M., Rill R. L. Sequence specificity of DNA cleavage by bis(1,10-phenanthroline)copper(I). Biochemistry. 1988 Mar 22;27(6):1822–1827. doi: 10.1021/bi00406a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Walker G. T., Stone M. P., Krugh T. R. Interaction of drugs with Z-DNA: cooperative binding of actinomycin D or actinomine to the left-handed forms of poly(dG-dC).poly(dG-dC) and poly(dG-m5dC).poly(dG-m5dC) reverses the conformation of the helix. Biochemistry. 1985 Dec 3;24(25):7471–7479. doi: 10.1021/bi00346a066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wells R. D., Larson J. E. Studies on the binding of actinomycin D to DNA and DNA model polymers. J Mol Biol. 1970 Apr 28;49(2):319–342. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90248-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. White R. J., Phillips D. R. Bidirectional transcription footprinting of DNA binding ligands. Biochemistry. 1989 Jul 25;28(15):6259–6269. doi: 10.1021/bi00441a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Williams L. D., Egli M., Qi G., Bash P., van der Marel G. A., van Boom J. H., Rich A., Frederick C. A. Structure of nogalamycin bound to a DNA hexamer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(6):2225–2229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.6.2225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wilson W. D., Jones R. L., Zon G., Banville D. L., Marzilli L. G. Specificity in DNA interactions: an nmr investigation of the interaction of propidium with oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing normal and G-T base pairs. Biopolymers. 1986 Oct;25(10):1997–2015. doi: 10.1002/bip.360251013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yanagi K., Privé G. G., Dickerson R. E. Analysis of local helix geometry in three B-DNA decamers and eight dodecamers. J Mol Biol. 1991 Jan 5;217(1):201–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90620-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yielding L. W., Yielding K. L., Donoghue J. E. Ethidium binding to deoxyribonucleic acid: spectrophotometric analysis of analogs with amino, azido, and hydrogen substituents. Biopolymers. 1984 Jan;23(1):83–110. doi: 10.1002/bip.360230108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES