Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry logoLink to Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry
. 2010 Sep 14;26(1):28–31. doi: 10.1007/s12291-010-0075-1

Myeloperoxidase in Chronic Kidney Disease

A Madhusudhana Rao 1, Usha Anand 1, C V Anand 1,
PMCID: PMC3068762  PMID: 22211010

Abstract

Numerous lines of evidence implicate a role of myeloperoxidase (MPO) in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is a well accepted fact that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at an increased risk for CVD. MPO is a pro-oxidant enzyme which could be involved in the increased susceptibility of these patients to CVD. Hence, the levels of plasma MPO was determined in healthy controls as well as in patients with CKD [stratified with the level of their kidney failure as CKD stages II–V (end stage renal disease)]. Plasma MPO was assayed by a spectrophotometric method. Serum urea and creatinine were estimated on a clinical chemistry analyzer using standard laboratory procedures. The mean plasma MPO levels were significantly lower with advancing stages of renal failure (P < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between MPO and GFR (r = +0.89, P < 0.001) and a negative correlation with urea (r = −0.85, P < 0.001) and creatinine (r = −0.82, P < 0.001). While an inverse association was observed between plasma MPO and urea in CKD patients, such an association was not observed in control subjects (P = 0.43). In conclusion, the decline in plasma MPO levels may be due to the inhibitory effect of uraemic toxins on the enzyme.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease, MPO-hydrogen peroxide–chloride system, Oxidative stress, Uraemic toxins, Cardiovascular disease

Introduction

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) was traditionally considered to be a bactericidal agent [1]. Recent investigations revealed a crucial role of MPO in chronic, nonmicrobial inflammatory processes such as neurodegenerative diseases and atherosclerosis [2]. MPO, a glycosylated, arginine-rich, extremely basic protein (isoelectric point >10) [1] is comprised of two subunits, encoded within a single mRNA. Two of each subunits are assembled with heme molecules to produce the functional enzyme (donor: hydrogen peroxide, oxidoreductase, EC 1.11.1.7). MPO is stored in primary azurophilic granules of leukocytes and the enzyme accounts for up to 5 and 1% of total cell protein content, in neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes (neutrophils) and monocytes, respectively [3].

The ability of MPO to generate hypochlorous acid/hypochlorite (HOCl/OCl) from hydrogen peroxide in the presence of chloride ions is a unique and defining activity for this enzyme [4]. The importance of MPO-catalyzed oxidative reactions and formation of a variety of chlorinated protein and lipid adducts (with hypochlorous acid as the major oxidant in causing tissue injury by phagocytic cells) has been emphasized [5]. Furthermore, high levels of MPO-mediated endothelial dysfunction may be an important mechanistic link between oxidation, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [6]. An elevated level of plasma MPO served as independent predictor of increased risk of myocardial infarction [7]. However, the role of MPO in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is poorly understood, and not much data is available regarding the variations of this enzyme in these patients. Hence, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the MPO levels in various stages of CKD including end stage renal disease (ESRD). It was speculated that raised levels of this enzyme might be one of the factors responsible for the increased risk that these patients have for developing CVD.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

The study was conducted on successive patients after informed consent was obtained from them. It was approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee. A total of 100 subjects (73 male and 27 female, aged 19–76 years) were recruited for this study. Control subjects (n = 20) with normal kidney function had GFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, while CKD patients with stage II (n = 20) had GFR between 60 and 89 ml/min/1.73 m2, stage III (n = 20) had GFR between 30 and 59 ml/min/1.73 m2, stage IV had GFR between 15 and 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 and stage V (ESRD) had GFR <15 ml/min/1.73 m2 [8]. Patients suffering from diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy, and acute infections were excluded from the study.

Methodology

Samples of blood were collected from the patients using vacutainers (BD, USA) containing clot activator for serum and with fluoride–EDTA for plasma. The samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 2000 rpm and stored at −20°C until analysis. Serum creatinine was measured using an automated Jaffe’s assay on the Olympus AU 400 (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan) analyzer according to the manufacturer’s procedure. Serum urea was estimated using standard clinical chemistry procedure with Cobas Integra 400 plus auto analyzer, using Roche reagents.

GFR was calculated using the re-expressed four variable MDRD formula [9].

graphic file with name M1.gif

Estimation of Plasma MPO

MPO activity was measured spectrophotometrically using o-dianisidine (Sigma-Aldrich) and hydrogen peroxide [10]. In the presence of H2O2 as oxidizing agent, MPO catalyses the oxidation of o-dianisidine yielding a brown coloured product, oxidized o-dianisidine, with a maximum absorbance at 470 nm, according to the following overall reaction:

graphic file with name M2.gif

One unit (U) of MPO activity was defined as that degrading 1 μmol of hydrogen peroxide per minute at 25°C.

Statistical Analysis

All the values obtained are expressed as mean and SD. Student’s t test was applied to assess the significance. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between the parameters. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

The results are shown in Tables 1, 2 and Figs. 1, 2a, b, 3a, b. Table 1 shows mean and standard deviation of age, male to female ratio, GFR, urea and creatinine of controls and CKD patients.

Table 1.

Age, sex, GFR and biochemical parameters in predialysis patients at various stages of CKD

Controls (n = 20) Stage II (n = 20) Stage III (n = 20) Stage IV (n = 20) Stage V (n = 20)
Age (years) 35 ± 5.4 40 ± 12.3 43 ± 12.7 52 ± 13.2 59 ± 11.4
Sex (male/female) 14/6 16/4 11/9 14/6 18/2
GFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) 113 ± 8.6 71 ± 8.8* 38 ± 6.3* 18 ± 3.1* 11 ± 2.4*
S. urea (mg/dl) 25 ± 5.3 33 ± 8.8** 48 ± 14.5** 71 ± 15.3* 111 ± 16.5*
S. creatinine (mg/dl) 0.73 ± 0.07 0.95 ± 0.12* 1.74 ± 0.29* 3.27 ± 0.58* 6.77 ± 1.82*
Plasma MPO(U/l) 217 ± 31.6 100 ± 5.6* 73 ± 9.1* 44 ± 8.8* 21 ± 6.16*

Values are Mean ± SD; * P < 0.001 and ** P < 0.01 (compared to controls)

Table 2.

Regression analyses between plasma MPO levels and GFR, urea, creatinine values in CKD patients

S. no. r Value P value
1 Plasma MPO and GFR +0.89 <0.001
2 Plasma MPO and urea −0.85 <0.001
3 Plasma MPO and SCr −0.82 <0.001

The correlation coefficients (r) were significant at the indicated P value

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Histogram showing the plasma MPO levels (U/l) in CKD patients stratified with the level of their kidney failure in CKD stages II–V (ESRD)

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Regression analysis showing the relationship between plasma MPO and serum urea, in controls (a) and CKD patients (b)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Regression analysis showing the relationship between plasma MPO and serum creatinine, in controls (a) and CKD patients (b)

The serum creatinine, urea levels in the control samples varied from 0.58 to 0.81, 17 to 47 mg/dl and for the CKD patients it varied from 0.73 to 10.25, 17 to 134 mg/dl. The MPO levels in controls varied from 136.80 to 290.70 U/l and for the CKD patients it varied from 11.97 to 107.73 U/l.

The plasma MPO levels were significantly lower in CKD when compared with the controls (P < 0.05). When the patients were segregated on the basis of the stages of CKD, plasma MPO levels were found to fall steadily with advancing renal failure. Also, statistically significant differences were found between each stage and its preceding one as indicated in the graph (Fig. 1).

There was a positive correlation between plasma MPO and GFR (r = +0.89, P < 0.001) and a negative correlation was observed between plasma MPO and SCr (r = −0.82, P < 0.001, Table 2). There was a significant negative correlation between plasma MPO and urea, in CKD patients (r = −0.85, P < 0.001, Fig. 2b); while there was no significant correlation in control subjects (Fig. 2a). Similarly a significant negative correlation was observed between plasma MPO and S. creatinine in CKD patients (Fig 3b), while no such correlation was observed between these two parameters in the controls (Fig 3a).

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge this is the first study which has demonstrated that there is a progressive fall in mean plasma MPO levels with advancing renal disease. MPO is an enzyme which has been shown to play an important role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Several mechanisms by which elevated levels of MPO can promote cardiovascular complications have been described [11]. Patients with CKD are at a higher risk for CVD [12]. Therefore this study was performed to determine MPO activity in patients with CKD. However, results have shown that plasma MPO levels are significantly lower in CKD patients as compared to controls. Thus there is a clear indication that this enzyme does not have a role in the etiology of cardiovascular complications in patients with CKD.

Several studies have indicated that MPO serves as an enzymatic source for bioactive lipids and its generated adduct products have been shown to adversely affect the protective capacity of high-density lipoprotein as well as to induce endothelial dysfunction [13, 14]. Inflammation and oxidative stress are known to induce endothelial dysfunction and the role of MPO remains controversial in these patients. This study has demonstrated that in patients with CKD the enzyme MPO does not have a significant role in oxidative stress mediated endothelial dysfunction. Capeillere et al. [15] have also suggested that in uraemic patients, plasma proteins could be directly oxidized by an MPO independent mechanism and the generation of advanced oxidation protein products occurs mainly via an MPO independent pathway. These observations emphasize the role of other agents in causing increased oxidative stress-mediated endothelial dysfunction, which might ultimately manifest in higher incidence of cardiovascular complications in CKD.

The reasons for the fall in the levels of plasma MPO are not known with certainty. However, it could be speculated that this may be due to the uremic environment. Cyanate (CNO) is chemically similar to thiocyanate (SCN), a so-called pseudohalide, which can serve as substrate for peroxidases such as lactoperoxidase, MPO and eosinophil peroxidase yielding hypothiocyanous acid (HOSCN) [16]. Dirnhuber and Schutz [17] reported that under physiological conditions, cyanate (CNO) forms spontaneously in solutions containing urea, and is present in urine and the body fluids of uraemic patients and reaches equilibrium in the molar ratio of approximately 0.0075:1 (CNO-urea). Therefore it is possible that CNO also may act as a pseudohalide but that the product of an MPO–CNO− reaction, if any, could be relatively impotent in bacterial killing and/ or may directly inhibit MPO [18]. The present study has also shown a significant negative correlation between urea and MPO in CKD; while no significant correlation was observed in the control subjects. Hence, it could be speculated that the decline in MPO levels in CKD patients might be due to the inhibitory action of uraemic toxins, particularly CNO, on this enzyme.

In conclusion, the study has shown that, plasma MPO levels decline steadily as the CKD progresses, possibly due to the inhibitory effect of uraemic toxins on the enzyme. However, the precise inhibitory role of uraemic toxins such as cyanate (CNO) on MPO has to be investigated in detail. This study further demonstrates that the enzyme MPO cannot be invoked to account for the increased susceptibility to CVD of CKD patients.

References

  • 1.Hampton MB, Kettle AJ, Winterbourn CC. Inside the neutrophil phagosome: oxidants, myeloperoxidase, and bacterial killing. Blood. 1998;92:3007–3017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Podrez EA, Abu-soud HM, Hazen SL. Myeloperoxidase generated oxidants and atherosclerosis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;28:1717–1725. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00229-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brown KE, Brunt EM, Heinecke JW. Immunohistochemical detection of myeloperoxidase and its oxidation products in Kupffer cells of human liver. Am J Pathol. 2001;159:2081–2088. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63059-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Winterbourn CC, Kettle AJ. Biomarkers of myeloperoxidase derived hypo chlorous acid. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;29:403–409. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(00)00204-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heinecke JW. Mechanisms of oxidative damage by myeloperoxidase in atherosclerosis and other inflammatory disorders. J Lab Clin Med. 1999;133:321–325. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2143(99)90061-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vita JA, Brennan ML, Gokce N, Mann SA, Goormastic M, Shishehbor MH, et al. Serum myeloperoxidase levels independently predict endothelial dysfunction in humans. Circulation. 2004;110:1134–1139. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000140262.20831.8F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brennan ML, Penn MS, Vn Lente FV, Nambi V, Shishehbor MH, Aviles RJ. Prognostic value of myeloperoxidase in patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1595–1604. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:137–147. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-2-200307150-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T et al. Expressing the MDRD study equation for estimating GFR with IDMS traceable (gold standard) serum creatinine values. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005;16:69A.
  • 10.Krueger AJ, Yang JJ, Roy TA, Robbins DJ, Mackerer CR. An automated myeloperoxidase assay. Clin Chem. 1990;36:158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arsenault BJ, Stroes ES, Boekholdt SM. Is myeloperoxidase a useful marker to predict the risk of cardiovascular events? Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2009;3:137–143. doi: 10.1007/s12170-009-0022-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Weiner DE, Tighiourat H, Amin MG, Stark PC, Macleod B, Griffith JL, et al. Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a pooled analysis of community-based studies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:1307–1315. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000123691.46138.E2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Malle E, Buch T, Grone HJ. Myeloperoxidase in kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2003;64:1956–1967. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00336.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maruyama Y, Lindholm B, Stenvinkel P. Inflammation and oxidative stress in ESRD—the role of myeloperoxidase. J Nephrol. 2004;17(Suppl 8):72–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Capeillere BC, Gausson V, Nguyen AT, Descamps LB, Drueke T, Witko SV. Respective role of uraemic toxins and myeloperoxidase in the uraemic state. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:1555–1563. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Slungaard A, Mahoney JR. Thiocyanate is the major substrate for eosinophil peroxidase in physiologic fluids. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:4903–4910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dirnhuber P, Schutz F. The isomeric transformation of urea into ammonium cyanate in aqueous solutions. Biochem J. 1948;42:628–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mingwei Q, John WE, Simon PW. Cyanate-mediated inhibition of neutrophil myeloperoxidase activity. Biochem J. 1997;326:159–166. doi: 10.1042/bj3260159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES