Skip to main content
NCBI home page
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010 Dec 26;25(4):343–350. doi: 10.1177/1545968310390520

Abbreviated environmental enrichment enhances neurobehavioral recovery comparably to continuous exposure after traumatic brain injury

Benjamin Wells de Witt 1,2, Kathryn M Ehrenberg 1,2,a, Rose L McAloon 1,2, Amanda H Panos 1,2,b, Kaitlyn E Shaw 1,2, Priya V Raghavan 1,2, Elizabeth R Skidmore 1,6, Anthony E Kline 1,2,3,4,5,*
PMCID: PMC3069145  NIHMSID: NIHMS277379  PMID: 21186330

Abstract

Background

Environmental enrichment (EE) is a complex living milieu that has been shown to enhance functional recovery vs. standard (STD) housing after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) and therefore may be considered a rodent correlate of rehabilitation. However, the typical EE paradigm consists of continuous exposure to enrichment after TBI, which is inconsistent with the limited time frame in clinical rehabilitation.

Objective

To determine whether abbreviated EE (i.e., rehabilitation-relevant dose response) confers benefits similar to typical EE after TBI.

Methods

Adult male rats received either a controlled cortical impact (2.8 mm depth at 4 m/sec) or sham injury and were then randomly assigned to TBI + EE, TBI + EE (2hr), TBI + EE (4hr), TBI + EE (6hr), TBI + STD, and respective sham controls. Motor (beam-balance/beam-walk; BB/BW) and cognitive (Morris water maze; MWM) performance was assessed on post-operative days 1-5 and 14-19, respectively.

Results

The TBI + EE (2hr) and TBI + EE (4hr) groups were not statistically different from the TBI + STD group in any behavioral assessment. In contrast, the TBI + EE (6hr) group exhibited significant enhancement of motor and cognitive performance vs. the TBI + STD group, as well as the TBI + EE (2hr) and TBI + EE (4hr) groups (p < 0.003), and did not differ from the TBI + EE (typical) group.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that abbreviated EE (6hr) produces motor and cognitive benefits similar to continuous EE after TBI and thus may be considered a dose-relevant rehabilitation paradigm.

Keywords: controlled cortical impact; environmental enrichment; functional recovery; galantamine, learning and memory; Morris water maze

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects an estimated 1.7 million Americans each year and results in 52,000 deaths and 120,000 cases of long-term neurological disabilities 1-5. In addition to the morbidity and mortality caused by TBI, the acute and chronic medical and rehabilitative care along with the loss of productivity due to the inability to return to the work force in a timely manner, or at all, imposes a significant monetary burden, which is estimated to be greater than $50 billion per year 6. Hence, TBI is a significant public health care concern. In order to combat this problem, a variety of relatively invasive therapeutic approaches, such as the administration of various pharmacologic strategies 7-16, hypothermia 17-20, and neurotrophins 21-24, have been evaluated. Additionally, non-invasive therapeutic approaches that potentially mimic clinical rehabilitation post-TBI, such as exercise 25-26 and environmental enrichment (EE) 27-32 have also been assessed.

EE consists of an enlarged living space, increased social interaction, and novel stimuli that together provide physical and cognitive stimulation 32 that results in a variety of neuroplastic changes after brain injury 33-37. EE facilitates learning and memory after cortical impact 29,30,32 and fluid percussion brain injury 27,28,31 and also improves motor performance 29,30,32, thus establishing it as a reasonable rodent correlate of human rehabilitation. The majority of research assessing the potential of EE to mimic clinical rehabilitation after TBI consists of continuous exposure to the complex living milieu. However, clinical rehabilitation after TBI consists of a limited amount of physical and occupational therapy. In many instances patients must be able to tolerate at least 3 hrs of therapy per day to qualify for inpatient rehabilitation, but in practice the length of time (i.e., intensity) in therapy after TBI varies from a minimum of 1 hr up to a maximum of 8 hrs per day depending on the rehabilitation setting 38-41. Thus, while the extent of clinical rehabilitation may be longer than the 3 hr minimum, it is certainly shorter than the continuous nature of typically used EE paradigms. The difference between the relatively short duration of daily clinical rehabilitation after TBI and the continuous exposure of EE emphasizes a disparity between the experimental model and the clinical situation.

Thus, the goal of the current study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of an abbreviated enrichment (i.e., dose-relevant) paradigm consisting of 2, 4, or 6 hrs of EE per day, which may be viewed as more akin to clinical rehabilitation. The hypothesis is that the abbreviated EE groups will exhibit greater motor recovery and acquisition of spatial learning and memory retention versus the STD housed group, and in a dose-dependent manner would also perform comparably to the continuous EE group.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Eighty adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) weighing 300-325 g on the day of surgery were housed in standard steel-wire mesh cages and maintained in a temperature (21 ± 1°C) and light (on 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.) controlled environment with food and water available ad libitum. After a one-week acclimatization period all rats underwent a single day of beam-walk training, which consisted of 3-5 trials to traverse the beam. Following training the rats were randomly assigned to one of the following group conditions: TBI + EE (n=10), TBI + EE (2 hr; n=10), TBI + EE (4 hr; n=10), TBI + EE (6 hr; n=10), TBI + STD (n=10), Sham + EE (n=6), Sham + EE (2 hr; n=6), Sham + EE (4 hr; n=6), Sham + EE (6 hr; n=6), and Sham + STD (n=6). It should be noted that “TBI + EE” refers to the group receiving continuous environmental enrichment. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Pittsburgh and were conducted in accordance with the recommendations provided in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 42. Every attempt was made to limit the number of rats used and to minimize suffering.

Surgery

A controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury was produced as previously described 7,8,43,44. Briefly, surgical anesthesia was induced and maintained with inspired concentrations of 4% and 2% isoflurane, respectively, in 2:1 N2O:O2. After endotracheal intubation the rats were secured in a stereotaxic frame, ventilated mechanically, and temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C with a heating blanket. Using aseptic procedures a midline scalp incision was made, the skin and fascia were reflected to expose the skull, and a craniectomy (6-mm in diameter) was made in the right hemisphere (encompassing bregma and lambda and between the sagittal suture and the coronal ridge) with a hand held trephine. The bone flap was removed and the craniectomy was enlarged further with cranial rongeurs. Subsequently, the impacting rod was extended and the impact tip (6 mm, flat) was centered and lowered through the craniectomy until it touched the dura mater, then the rod was retracted and the impact tip was advanced 2.8 mm farther to produce a brain injury of moderate severity (2.8 mm tissue deformation at 4 m/sec). Immediately after the CCI, anesthesia was discontinued and the incision was promptly sutured. The rats were subsequently extubated and assessed for acute neurological outcome. Sham rats underwent similar surgical procedures, but were not subjected to the impact.

Acute neurological evaluation

Hind limb reflexive ability was assessed immediately following the cessation of anesthesia by gently squeezing the rats’ paw every 5 sec and recording the time to elicit a withdrawal response. Return of the righting reflex was determined by the time required to turn from the supine to prone position.

Housing conditions: (environmental manipulation)

Following surgery, and after the effects of anesthesia abated (as evidenced by free movement in the holding cage), the rats were returned to the colony where the TBI and sham groups designated for continuous enrichment were immediately placed in specifically designed 36×30×20 inch steel-wire cages. The EE cages consisted of three levels with ladders to ambulate from one level to another and contained various toys (e.g., balls, blocks, and tubes), nesting materials (e.g., paper towels), and ad libitum food and water 30,32. To maintain novelty, the objects were rearranged every day and changed each time the cage was cleaned, which was twice per week. Ten to twelve rats, which included both TBI and sham controls, were housed in the EE. Rats in the STD conditions and those randomly assigned to abbreviated EE were placed in standard steel-wire mesh cages (2 rats per cage) with only food and water. On the following day, and throughout the behavioral assessment period (19 days), the abbreviated EE groups were removed from the STD cages and placed in the EE for their prescribed times (e.g., 2, 4, or 6 hrs) and then returned to the STD conditions.

Motor performance

Established beam-balance and beam-walk tasks were used to assess motor function. The beam-balance task consists of placing the rat on an elevated beam (1.5 cm wide) and recording the time it remains on for a maximum of 60 sec. The beam-walk task, modified from that originally devised by Feeney and colleagues 45, consists of training/assessing rats using a negative-reinforcement paradigm to escape ambient light and white noise by traversing an elevated narrow beam (2.5 × 100 cm) and entering a darkened goal box situated at the opposite end. When the rat enters the goal box the adverse stimuli (light and noise) are terminated thus serving as reinforcement (reward) for completing the task. Performance was assessed by recording both the elapsed time to traverse the beam as well as the distance traveled. The scoring criteria for distance traveled is based on a rating scale from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates an inability to ambulate beyond the start location, 1-4 corresponds to distal segments of 20, 40, 60, or 80 cm from the start point, respectively, and 5 corresponds with traversing the entire length of the beam (100 cm) and entering the goal box 7. Rats were tested for beam-balance and beam-walk performance prior to surgery to establish a baseline measure and again on post-operative days 1-5. Testing consisted of three trials (60 sec allotted time with an inter-trial interval of 30 sec) per day on each task. The average daily scores for each subject were used in the statistical analyses.

Cognitive function: acquisition of spatial learning

Spatial learning was assessed in a Morris water maze 46 task that has been shown to be sensitive to cognitive function after TBI 7-10,47,48. Briefly, the maze consisted of a plastic pool (180 cm diameter; 60 cm high) filled with tap water (26 ± 1°C) to a depth of 28 cm and was situated in a room with salient visual cues that remained constant throughout the study. The platform was a clear Plexiglas stand (10 cm diameter, 26 cm high) that was positioned 26 cm from the maze wall in the southwest quadrant and held constant for each rat. Spatial learning began on post-operative day 14 and consisted of providing a block of four daily trials (4-min inter-trial interval) for five consecutive days (14–18) to locate the platform when it was submerged 2 cm below the water surface (i.e., invisible to the rat). On day 19 the platform was raised 2 cm above the water surface (i.e., visible to the rat) as a control procedure to determine the contributions of non-spatial factors (e.g., sensory-motor performance, motivation, and visual acuity) on cognitive performance. For each daily block of trials the rats were placed in the pool facing the wall at each of the four possible start locations (north, east, south, and west) in a randomized manner. Each trial lasted until the rat climbed onto the platform or until 120 sec had elapsed, whichever occurred first. Rats that failed to locate the goal within the allotted time were manually guided to it. All rats remained on the platform for 30 sec before being placed in a heated incubator between trials. The times of the 4 daily trials for each rat were averaged and used in the statistical analyses.

Cognitive function: probe trial (memory retention)

One day after the final acquisition training session (i.e., day 19), all rats were given a single probe trial to measure memory retention. Briefly, the platform was removed from the pool and the rats were placed in the maze from the location point most distal to the quadrant where the platform was previously situated (i.e., “target quadrant”) and allowed to freely explore the pool for 30 sec. Typically, rats that have learned the specific location of the escape platform exhibit a spatial bias and spend significantly more time in the target quadrant. The percent time spent in the target quadrant was used in the statistical analysis.

A spontaneous motor activity recording and tracking (SMART) system (San Diego Instruments, San Diego, CA) was used to record the data, which included time to locate the platform, time in the target quadrant, and swim speed.

Data analyses

Statistical analyses were performed on data collected by observers blinded to treatment conditions using StatView 5.0.1 software (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA). The motor and cognitive data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The acute neurological, probe trial, and swim speed data were analyzed by one-factor ANOVAs. When the ANOVA showed a significant effect, the Bonferroni/Dunn post hoc test was utilized to determine specific group differences. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) and were considered significant when p values were ≥ 0.05 or as determined by the Bonferroni/Dunn statistic after correcting for multiple comparisons.

Results

Two rats were excluded from the analyses [one in the TBI + EE and another in the TBI + EE (2hr) groups] as they were unable to locate the visible platform, which may be indicative of visual deficits that would preclude accurate assessment of spatial learning. Thus the data analyses were conducted on 78 rats. Because there were no significant differences in any assessment among the sham control groups, regardless of housing, the data were pooled into one SHAM group.

Acute neurological function

No significant differences were observed among the TBI groups in time to recover the hind limb withdrawal reflex in response to a brief paw pinch [right range = 178.5 ± 4.6 sec to 195.6 ± 5.7 sec, p > 0.05; left range = 183.6 ± 4.7 sec to 200.2 ± 5.8 sec, p > 0.05] or for return of righting ability [range 374.9 ± 14.2 sec to 412.7 ± 11.9 sec, p > 0.05] following the cessation of anesthesia. The lack of significant differences with these acute neurological indices suggests that all groups experienced an equivalent level of injury and anesthesia 7-12,29,30,32,44.

Motor function: beam-balance

No differences were observed among groups prior to surgery as all rats were capable of balancing on the beam for the allotted 60 sec (Fig. 1). Following TBI all groups, except the TBI + EE, were significantly impaired relative to the SHAM group. The ANOVA revealed significant Group [F5,72 = 10.647, p < 0.0001] and Day [F5,360 = 58.378, p < 0.0001] differences, as well as a significant Group × Day interaction [F25,360 = 6.485, p < 0.0001]. The post-hoc analysis revealed that the continuous EE group was able to maintain its balance significantly longer, and regain that ability sooner, than the TBI + STD and TBI + EE (4 hr) groups [p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0006, respectively]. No other comparisons were statistically significant.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Mean (± S.E.M.) time (sec) balancing on an elevated narrow beam prior to, and after, TBI or sham injury. *p < 0.0005 vs. TBI + STD and p < 0.0006 vs. TBI + EE (4hr). **p < 0.0001 vs. all TBI groups, except the TBI + EE (typical). No other group differences were significant.

Motor function: beam-walk (traversal time)

No pre-surgical differences in time to traverse the beam were revealed among groups as all rats were proficient and reached the goal box in approximately 5 sec (Fig. 2). After TBI, the ANOVA revealed significant Group [F5,72 = 22.103, p < 0.0001] and Day [F5,360 = 163.282, p < 0.0001] differences, as well as a significant Group × Day interaction [F25,360 = 14.055, p < 0.0001]. All TBI groups differed from the SHAM controls [p < 0.0001]. Additionally, the TBI + EE and TBI + EE (6hr) groups traversed the beam significantly quicker than the TBI + STD group [p’s < 0.0023], and did not differ from one another [p = 0.29]. No other comparisons were significant.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Mean (± S.E.M.) time (sec) to traverse an elevated narrow beam prior to, and after, TBI or sham injury. *p’s < 0.0023 vs. TBI + STD. **p < 0.0001 vs. all TBI groups. No other group differences were significant.

Motor function: beam-walk (distance traveled)

No pre-surgical differences were observed among groups as all rats were capable of traversing the entire length of the beam for a score of 5 (Fig. 3). However, after TBI, the ANOVA revealed significant Group [F5,72 = 15.204, p < 0.0001] and Day [F5,360 = 113.732, p < 0.0001] differences, as well as a significant Group × Day interaction [F25,360 = 11.194, p < 0.0001]. All TBI groups differed from the SHAM controls [p < 0.0001]. Additionally, the TBI + EE and TBI + EE (6hr) groups returned to baseline performance significantly faster than the TBI + STD group [p’s < 0.0010], and did not differ from one another [p = 0.16]. No other comparisons were significant.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Mean (± S.E.M.) distance traveled along an elevated narrow beam prior to, and after, TBI or sham injury. *p’s < 0.0010 vs. TBI + STD. **p’s < 0.0001 vs. all TBI groups. No other group differences were significant.

Cognitive function: acquisition of spatial learning

Analysis of the spatial learning data revealed significant Group [F5,72 = 26.938, p < 0.0001] and Day [F4,288 = 44.118, p < 0.0001] differences. The post-hoc analysis indicated that the TBI + EE and TBI + EE (6hr) groups were able to locate the escape platform significantly quicker over time vs. the TBI + STD, TBI + EE (2hr), and TBI + EE (4hr) groups [p’s < 0.0029], and did not differ from one another [p = 0.89; Fig. 4]. The SHAM group was significantly better than all TBI groups [p < 0.0001]. No significant differences in swim speed (range = 31.3 ± 1.1 cm/sec to 33.9 ± 0.9 cm/sec) were observed among the groups. There was no significant difference among the TBI groups, regardless of housing condition, in the time to locate the visible platform, but the SHAM control group was able to reach it in significantly less time [p’s < 0.0002]. The similarity in the TBI groups suggests that neither motor impairments nor visual disparities influenced the assessment of place learning.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Mean (± S.E.M.) time (sec) to locate either a hidden (submerged) or visible (raised) platform in a water maze. *p’s < 0.0029 vs. TBI + STD, TBI + EE (2hr), and TBI + EE (4hr). **p < 0.0001 vs. all TBI groups. No significant differences were revealed among the TBI groups for time to locate the visible platform, but the SHAM was able to reach it in significantly less time [p’s < 0.0002].

Cognitive function: probe trial

Analysis of the probe data revealed significant memory retention in both the TBI + EE and SHAM groups as evidenced by a greater percentage of the 30 sec allotted time spent in the target quadrant (40.2 ± 3.8 % and 41.8 ± 1.6 %, respectively) vs. the TBI + STD group (25.6 ± 2.5 %) [p’s < 0.0018]. Additionally, the SHAM group was significantly better than the TBI + EE (2hr) and TBI + EE (4hr) groups (27.8 ± 3.2 % and 29.7 ± 3.3 %, respectively), but was not statistically different from the TBI + EE (6hr) group that spent 34.3 ± 3.4 % of its time in the target quadrant (Fig. 5). The TBI + EE (6hr) was not statistically different from either the continuous EE group (p = 0.19) or the TBI + STD group (p = 0.053), although there was a strong trend for enhanced retention vs. the latter.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Mean (± S.E.M.) percentage of time spent in the target quadrant (i.e., where platform was previously located) following a single probe trial 19 days after cortical impact or sham injury. *p = 0.0018 vs. TBI + STD + vehicle. **p < 0.0011 vs. TBI + STD, TBI + EE (2hr) and TBI + EE (4hr). No other comparisons were significant. The dotted line represents performance at the chance level (25%).

Discussion

The majority of studies demonstrating the ability of EE to provide significant behavioral improvement after TBI have provided continuous enrichment, which is inconsistent with the limited number of hrs per day of rehabilitation seen in the clinical setting. Therefore, if EE is to move forward as a reasonable rehabilitation paradigm it is essential that the dosing parameters be worked out. Hence, the aim of the current study was to determine if abbreviated EE would provide similar motor and/or cognitive benefits as those seen with continuous EE. The data revealed that motor performance and spatial learning was significantly improved in the continuous EE group vs. STD housed controls, which replicates previous findings from our laboratory 29,30,32 and others 27,28,31. Additionally, a novel finding in this study was that the TBI + EE (6hr) group also conferred significant motor (beam-walk) and cognitive enhancement relative to the STD group. Moreover, in partial support of our hypothesis, the 6-hr EE group performed comparably to the continuous EE group. The 2-hr and 4-hr abbreviated EE groups did not differ from the STD controls in any behavioral measure, which did not support our hypothesis that any dose of EE would confer benefits.

These results indicate that continuous EE may not be necessary for optimal functional recovery after moderate TBI in rats. That the 6-hr EE and continuous EE groups performed similarly may suggest that there is a maximum time of enrichment in which the rats can benefit from the complex stimuli of the enriched setting. A plausible hypothesis is that the novelty, which is critical for optimal benefits 32, attenuates as time passes. If this is the case, it may be advantageous to change the stimuli (i.e., toys) twice per day instead of just once as is our current protocol. Perhaps “reintroducing” the novelty during the dark cycle when rats are more active may lead to greater benefits in the continuous EE groups. Furthermore, that the 2-hr and 4-hr EE groups did not show a benefit suggests that there is a certain threshold of enrichment that is necessary to elicit neurobehavioral recovery. However, a caveat to that statement is required as a study by Gaulke and colleagues 49 reported that 1 hr of EE per day was sufficient to augment cognitive recovery after fluid percussion brain injury. Moreover, in a seminal study, Will et al ref showed that 2 hr of EE after bilateral occipital cortex lesions was as effective as continuous EE in promoting cognitive benefits. However, the different models of injury along with diverse cognitive training protocols may explain the disparity in the amount of EE necessary to confer cognitive recovery.

The findings of this study may have clinical relevance as after severe TBI, patients may receive therapy in an acute inpatient setting or convalescent care at home or in a skilled nursing facility, and the cognitive and physical stimulation provided by the multidisciplinary therapy could be viewed as an enriching environment to patients. It should be noted that the 6 hrs of EE shown to benefit outcome in the current study is not inconsistent with clinical rehabilitation. Specifically, while the inpatient standard may be a minimum of 3 hrs of therapy, this time can certainly be increased, especially in the inpatient setting. There are additional factors of inpatient rehabilitation such as the social interaction with other patients as well as with nurses and other staff that increase stimulation in that environment over what the patient may receive in therapy alone. A prospective study by Shiel and colleagues 39 found that increasing the intensity of rehabilitation in TBI patients resulted in significantly shorter hospital admission and greater functional improvements. Zhu and colleagues 41 showed that a 4 hr per day rehabilitation program resulted in a quicker return to independent functional status than 2 hrs per day. While there was no effect on the final level of recovery, the ability to integrate the patient into society faster is certainly beneficial. These clinical reports parallel the data in the current experimental study showing that finding the optimal amount of exposure to rehabilitation in the clinical setting or enrichment in the experimental setting results in improved outcomes.

In conclusion, the findings of this descriptive study show that abbreviated enrichment (6-hr) is capable of producing behavioral benefit comparably to that of continuous EE and may be a promising dose-relevant rehabilitation paradigm. The lack of significant benefits in the 2-hr and 4-hr abbreviated EE groups clearly indicate that there is opportunity for improvement. Given that pharmacotherapies are routinely provided in the clinical setting, it is quite possible to further characterize the EE paradigm such that a sub-therapeutic level of EE (2-hr and 4-hr) is provided with sub-therapeutic pharmacologic agents that in combination may provide a synergistic effect. This paradigm might be optimal in the clinic because some, if not many, of the deleterious side effects of the treatments may be attenuated or avoided all together while still seeing a beneficial effect on functional recovery. Such a study in our animal model is currently on-going in our laboratory.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part, by National Institutes of Health grants HD046700 and NS06005 awarded to AEK and K12 HD055931 (ERS)

References

  • 1.Goldstein M. Traumatic brain injury: a silent epidemic. Ann. Neurol. 1990;27:327. doi: 10.1002/ana.410270315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sosin DM, Sniezek JE, Waxweiler RJ. Trends in death associated with traumatic brain injury, 1979 through 1992. JAMA. 1995;273:1778–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Selassie AW, Zaloshnja E, Langlois JA, Miller T, Jones P, Steiner C. Incidence of long-term disability following traumatic brain injury hospitalization, United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23:123–31. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000314531.30401.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Summers CR, Ivins B, Schwab KA. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: an epidemiologic overview. Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76:105–10. doi: 10.1002/msj.20100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Atlanta (GA): 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Max W, Mackenzie EJ, Rice DP. Head injuries: costs and consequences. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1991;6:76–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cheng JP, Hoffman AN, Zafonte RD, Kline AE. A delayed and chronic treatment regimen with the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT after cortical impact injury facilitates motor recovery and acquisition of spatial learning. Behav Brain Res. 2008;194:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kline AE, Massucci JL, Dixon CE, Zafonte RD, Bolinger BD. The therapeutic efficacy conferred by the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) after experimental traumatic brain injury is not mediated by concomitant hypothermia. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:175–85. doi: 10.1089/089771504322778631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kline AE, Massucci JL, Ma X, Zafonte RD, Dixon CE. Bromocriptine reduces lipid peroxidation and enhances spatial learning and hippocampal neuron survival in a rodent model of focal brain trauma. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:1712–22. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kline AE, Massucci JL, Marion DW, Dixon CE. Attenuation of working memory and spatial acquisition deficits after a delayed and chronic bromocriptine treatment regimen in rats subjected to traumatic brain injury by controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19:415–25. doi: 10.1089/08977150252932370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kline AE, Yu J, Horváth E, Marion DW, Dixon CE. The selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist repinotan HCl attenuates histopathology and spatial learning deficits following traumatic brain injury in rats. Neuroscience. 2001;106:547–55. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00300-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kline AE, Yu J, Massucci JL, Zafonte RD, Dixon CE. Protective effects of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) against traumatic brain injury-induced cognitive deficits and neuropathology in adult male rats. Neurosci Lett. 2002;333:179–82. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01101-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McDowell S, Whyte J, D’Esposito M. Differential effect of a dopaminergic agonist on prefrontal function in traumatic brain injury patients. Brain. 1998;121:1155–64. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.6.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parton A, Coulthard E, Husain M. Neuropharmacological modulation of cognitive deficits after brain damage. Curr Opin Neurol. 2005;18:675–80. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000189872.54245.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Temple MD, Hamm RJ. Chronic, post-injury administration of D-cycloserine, an NMDA partial agonist, enhances cognitive performance following experimental brain injury. Brain Res. 1996;741:246–51. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(96)00940-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wilson MS, Hamm RJ. Effects of fluoxetine on the 5-HT1A receptor and recovery of cognitive function after traumatic brain injury in rats. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;81:364–72. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200205000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bramlett HM, Green EJ, Dietrich WD, Busto R, Globus MY, Ginsberg MD. Posttraumatic brain hypothermia provides protection from sensorimotor and cognitive behavioral deficits. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12:289–98. doi: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Clark RS, Kochanek PM, Marion DW, Schiding JK, White M, Palmer AM, Dekosky ST. Mild posttraumatic hypothermia reduces mortality after severe controlled cortical impact in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:253–61. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199603000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clifton GL, Jiang JY, Lyeth BG, Jenkins LW, Hamm RJ, Hayes RL. Marked protection by moderate hypothermia after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1991;11:114–21. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Koizumi H, Povlishock JT. Posttraumatic hypothermia in the treatment of axonal damage in an animal model of traumatic axonal injury. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:303–09. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.2.0303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dixon CE, Flinn P, Bao J, Venya R, Hayes RL. Nerve growth factor attenuates cholinergic deficits following traumatic brain injury in rats. Exp Neurol. 1997;146:479–90. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1997.6557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McDermott KL, Raghupathi R, Fernandez SC, et al. Delayed administration of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) attenuates cognitive dysfunction following parasagittal fluid percussion brain injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma. 1997;14:191–200. doi: 10.1089/neu.1997.14.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saatman KE, Contreras PC, Smith DH, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) improves both neurological motor and cognitive outcome following experimental brain injury. Exp Neurol. 1997;147:418–27. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1997.6629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yan HQ, Yu J, Kline AE, Letart P, Jenkins LW, Marion DW, Dixon CE. Evaluation of combined fibroblast growth factor-2 and moderate hypothermia therapy in traumatically brain injured rats. Brain Res. 2000;887:134–43. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)03002-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Griesbach GS, Hovda DA, Gomez-Pinilla F. Exercise-induced improvement in cognitive performance after traumatic brain injury in rats is dependent on BDNF activation. Brain Res. 2009;1288:105–15. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Griesbach GS, Hovda DA, Gomez-Pinilla F, Sutton RL. Voluntary exercise or amphetamine treatment, but not the combination, increases hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor and synapsin I following cortical contusion injury in rats. Neuroscience. 2008;154:530–40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hamm RJ, Temple MD, O’Dell DM, Pike BR, Lyeth BG. Exposure to environmental complexity promotes recovery of cognitive function after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 1996;13:41–7. doi: 10.1089/neu.1996.13.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hicks RR, Zhang L, Atkinson A, Stevenon M, Veneracion M, Seroogy KB. Environmental enrichment attenuates cognitive deficits, but does not alter neurotrophin gene expression in the hippocampus following lateral fluid percussion brain injury. Neuroscience. 2002;112:631–37. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00104-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hoffman AN, Malena RR, Westergom BP, et al. Environmental enrichment-mediated functional improvement after experimental traumatic brain injury is contingent on task-specific neurobehavioral experience. Neurosci Lett. 2008;431:226–30. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.11.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kline AE, Wagner AK, Westergom BP, et al. Acute treatment with the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT and chronic environmental enrichment confer neurobehavioral benefit after experimental brain trauma. Behav Brain Res. 2007;177:186–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.11.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Passineau MJ, Green EJ, Dietrich WD. Therapeutic effects of environmental enrichment on cognitive function and tissue integrity following severe traumatic brain injury in rats. Exp Neurol. 2001;168:373–84. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sozda CN, Hoffman AN, Olsen AS, Cheng JP, Zafonte RD, Kline AE. Empirical comparison of typical and atypical environmental enrichment paradigms on functional and histological outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:1047–57. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature. 1997;386:493–95. doi: 10.1038/386493a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Leggio MG, Mandolesi L, Federico F, Spirito F, Ricci B, Gelfo F, Petrosini L. Environmental enrichment promotes improved spatial abilities and enhanced dendritic growth in the rat. Behav Brain Res. 2005;163:78–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Olson AK, Eadie BD, Ernst C, Christie BR. Environmental enrichment and voluntary exercise massively increase neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus via dissociable pathways. Hippocampus. 2006;16:250–60. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Torasdotter M, Metsis M, Henriksson BG, Winblad B, Mohammed AH. Environmental enrichment results in higher levels of nerve growth factor mRNA in the rat visual cortex and hippocampus. Behav Brain Res. 1998;93:83–90. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00142-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.van Praag K, Kempermann G, Gage FH. Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat Rev. 2000;1:191–8. doi: 10.1038/35044558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Blackerby WF. Intensity of rehabilitation and length of stay. Brain Inj. 1990;4:167–73. doi: 10.3109/02699059009026162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shiel A, Burn JP, Henry D, Clark J, Wilson BA, Burnett ME, McLellan DL. The effects of increased rehabilitation therapy after brain injury: results of a prospective controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15:501–14. doi: 10.1191/026921501680425225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Vanderploeg RD, Schwab K, Walker WC, et al. Rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury in active duty military personnel and veterans: defense and veterans brain injury center randomized controlled trial of two rehabilitation approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:2227–38. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhu XL, Poon WS, Chan CCH, Chan SSH. Does intensive rehabilitation improve the functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI)? A randomized controlled trial. Brain Inj. 2007;21:681–90. doi: 10.1080/02699050701468941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.National Research Council . Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy Press; Washington, D.C: 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dixon CE, Clifton GL, Lighthall JW, Yaghmai AA, Hayes RL. A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat. J Neurosci Meth. 1991;39:253–62. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(91)90104-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hoffman AN, Cheng JP, Zafonte RD, Kline AE. Administration of haloperidol and risperidone after neurobehavioral testing hinders the recovery of traumatic brain injury-induced deficits. Life Sci. 2008;83:602–7. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2008.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Feeney DM, Gonzalez A, Law WA. (Amphetamine, haloperidol, and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science. 1982;217:855–7. doi: 10.1126/science.7100929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Morris R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Meth. 1984;11:47–60. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hamm RJ, Dixon CE, Gbadebo DM, Singha AK, Jenkins LW, Lyeth BG, Hayes RL. Cognitive deficits following traumatic brain injury produced by controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma. 1992;9:11–20. doi: 10.1089/neu.1992.9.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Scheff SW, Baldwin SA, Brown RW, Kraemer PJ. Morris water maze deficits in rats following traumatic brain injury: lateral controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma. 1997;14:615–27. doi: 10.1089/neu.1997.14.615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gaulke LJ, Horner PJ, Fink AJ, McNamara CL, Hicks RR. Environmental enrichment increases progenitor cell survival in the dentate gyrus following lateral fluid percussion injury. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2005;141:138–50. doi: 10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Will BE, Rosenzweig MR, Bennett EL, Hebert M, Morimoto H. Relatively brief environmental enrichment aids recovery of learning capacity and alters brain measures after postweaning brain lesions in rats. J Comp Physiol Psych. 1977;91:33–50. doi: 10.1037/h0077306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES