Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2011 Feb 17;408(1):99–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.02.014

Solution structure of the K-turn and Specifier Loop domains from the Bacillus subtilis tyrS T box leader RNA

Jiachen Wang 1, Edward P Nikonowicz 1,*
PMCID: PMC3070822  NIHMSID: NIHMS275588  PMID: 21333656

Abstract

In Gram-positive bacteria, the RNA transcripts of many amino acid biosynthetic and aminoacyltRNA synthetase genes contain 5' untranslated regions, or leader RNAs, that function as riboswitches. These T bxo riboswitches bind cognate tRNA molecules and regulate gene expression by a transcription attenuation mechanism. The Specifier Loop domain of the leader RNA contains nucleotides that pair with nucleotides in the tRNA anticodon loop and is flanked on one side by a kink-turn, or GA, sequence motif. We have determined the solution NMR structure of the kink-turn (K-turn) sequence element within the context of the Specifier Loop domain. The K-turn sequence motif has several non-canonical base pairs typical of K-turn structures but adopts an extended conformation. The Specifier Loop domain contains a loop E structural motif and the single strand Specifier nucleotides stack with their Watson-Crick edges displaced toward the minor groove. Mg2+ leads to significant bending of the helix axis at the base of the Specifier Loop domain, but does not alter the K-turn. ITC indicates that the K-turn sequence causes a small enhancement of the interaction between tRNA anticodon arm with the Specifier Loop domain. One possibility is that the K-turn structure is formed and stabilized when tRNA binds the T box riboswitch and interacts with Stem I and the antiterminator helix. This motif in turn anchors the orientation of Stem I relative to the 3' half of the leader RNA, further stabilizing the tRNA-T box complex.

Keywords: heteronuclear, hairpin, tRNA, transcription regulation, riboswitch, antitermination

Introduction

In Gram-positive bacteria, the transcription of many tRNA synthetase genes and genes involved in amino acid metabolism is regulated in a tRNA-dependent manner by the T box riboswitch 1, 2. The transcription of T box regulated genes is prematurely terminated when the relative level of charged to uncharged tRNA is high. The binding of an uncharged tRNA molecule to the T box riboswitch permits read-through transcription of the gene. Each gene regulated by this mechanism responds to a specific species of tRNA (cognate tRNA) that is related to that gene’s function. The T box riboswitches are 200–300 nt 5' untranslated regions (or leader RNAs) of the gene transcripts that fold to form a complex set of stem-loop secondary structures including Stems I, II, and III and the mutually exclusive terminator and antiterminator hairpin secondary structures (Figure 1A). Formation of the thermodynamically more favorable terminator hairpin causes transcription to be terminated prior to the translation start codon of the gene 3. Read-through of the transcription termination site occurs when uncharged cognate tRNA binds to the leader RNA and stabilizes the antiterminator hairpin by pairing of nucleotides in the 3' end of the tRNA with a seven-nucleotide bulge in the antiterminator helix 4.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Sequence and proposed secondary structures of (A) the T box riboswitch of the Bacillus subtilis tyrS gene, (B) the 38 nt (tyrSHS), 33 nt (tyrSHK), and 55 nt (tyrSSK) RNA molecules, corresponding to the Specifier Loop domain and K-turn sequence motif of the tyrS leader RNA, and (C) the K-turn consensus sequence motif. The Specifier Loop domain and K-turn sequence motif of the tyrS leader RNA are boxed. The Specifier Sequence also is highlighted.

The specificity of the leader RNA-tRNA interaction is achieved through the anticodon bases and the discriminator base of the tRNA molecule 3, 5. The Specifier Loop domain is a conserved structural feature of the T box riboswitch Stem I that is variable in size and contains the Specifier Sequence. The Specifier Sequence, three nucleotides complementary to the anticodon nucleotides of the cognate tRNA, is the primary determinant of tRNA specificity. Also conserved in the Specifier Loop domain are a purine residue, 3' to the Specifier Sequence 6, 7, that pairs with U33 of tRNA 8 and a loop E structural motif. Near the 3' end of the leader RNA are the nucleotides that alternately form the terminator and antiterminator helices. In the antiterminator helix, four residues of a seven nt bulge base pair with nucleotides at the 3’ end of the tRNA, including the discriminator base. The contributions of these interactions in specifying the leader RNA-tRNA complex have been characterized in B. subtilis for the tyrS and glyQS leader RNAs 3, 9 and reproduced in vitro using a purified transcription assay and the glyQS leader RNA 8, 10.

In addition to the Specifier Loop domain of Stem I and the bulge in the antiterminator helix, other regions of the T box riboswitch exhibit a high degree of conservation and are functionally important 6, 7, 11. The Specifier Loop is flanked on one side by a sequence motif predicted to form a kink-turn (K-turn, or GA) structural motif 11. The K-turn motif has been identified in several RNAs 12 including rRNA 13, 14, the U4 snRNA 15, 16, the archaeal C/D-box snoRNA 17, the Azoarcus group I intron 18, and the lysine and S-adenosylmethionine riboswitches 19, 20. Most experimentally confirmed K-turns correspond to protein binding sites 13, 15, 21, but K-turns also have been observed outside protein-bound contexts 18, 20. The net structural effect of the K-turn on RNA is the introduction of a ~120 degree bend in the helix axis towards the minor groove 13. The reverse K-turn, which has been observed infrequently, leads to a bend toward the major groove 12, 22. The direction of the bend created by the K-turn is substantially influenced by elements outside the K-turn 23.

The K-turn sequence motif contains an asymmetric internal loop with flanking stems designated canonical (C-) and non-canonical (NC-). The consensus sequence features a pair of 5'-GA-3' dinucleotide sequences on opposite strands that form tandemly arranged sheared G-A base pairs and terminate the NC-stem 14. The C-stem is separated from the NC-stem by a string of three unpaired nucleotides and is capped by a G-C base pair (Figure 1C). The phosphate backbone turns sharply (kinks) between the second unpaired nucleotide and the third (NC-stem proximal) unpaired nucleotide. The base of the first unpaired nucleotide stacks on the terminal G-C pair of the C-stem and the base of the second unpaired nucleotide stacks against the terminal G-A pair of the NC-stem. A-minor interactions between adenines of the G-A pairs and nucleotides at the terminus of the C-stem also are present, but the relative contributions of these interactions for stabilizing the K-turn conformation are variable 24.

The high conservation of the kink-turn motif within Stem I of T box leader RNAs suggests an important role in leader function, including tRNA binding. Indeed, single base mutations predicted to disrupt the K-turn motif significantly reduce the ability of tRNA to promote transcriptional antitermination in vivo 11. The role of the K-turn sequence motif in this process is not known, but the glyQS T box riboswitch functions in a purified in vitro system 10, suggesting that it does not serve as a protein recognition site.

We have examined the solution structure, dynamics, and Mg2+-binding properties of the K-turn sequence motif and Specifier Loop domain from Stem I of the B. subtilis tyrS T box riboswitch. The K-turn sequence motif contains three unpaired adenine nucleotides and the C-stem is terminated by an A-U base pair (Figure 1A) in the tyrS leader sequence rather than the G-C base pair conserved among K-turns (Figure 1C). The Specifier Loop domain of this leader RNA contains 14 nucleotides and is connected to the K-turn sequence motif by a four base pair helix. Using solution NMR spectroscopy, we find that the K-turn sequence motif and the Specifier Loop domain are conformationally independent. The K-turn sequence motif is well-structured but does not adopt the prototypical K-turn fold in the presence or absence of Mg2+. The Specifier Loop domain contains a loop E structural element and the arrangement of the Specifier Sequence nucleotides are minimally altered by the presence of the K-turn. Isothermal titration calorimetry measurements also show that the K-turn sequence motif does not directly facilitate interaction between the Specifier codon and tRNA anticodon nucleotides. The results suggest a model in which tRNA binds to the T box riboswitch and stabilizes the K-turn structural motif with the characteristic bend in the helix axis.

RESULTS

The RNA molecule used for structural analysis in this study, tyrSSK (Figure 1B), contains 55 nucleotides and corresponds to the Specifier Loop domain joined to the conserved K-turn motif that together form the lower part of Stem I of the B. subtilis tyrS leader RNA. The assignments for tyrSSK were supplemented by examining spectra for individual RNA hairpins containing the K-turn motif, tyrSHK, and the Specifier Loop domain, tyrSHS. Cross peaks in the NH 15N-1H HSQC spectrum are consistent with the predicted secondary structure including the signature peak at 9.95 ppm from the UUCG tetraloop. The monomeric nature of the RNA is supported by moderate line widths (9–14 Hz 1H) and the nearly identical cross peak patterns in NH spectra at low (20µM) and high (1.4 mM) RNA concentrations. In addition, native gel analysis shows that all three hairpins migrate as single bands, supporting the presence of a single form.

Chemical shift assignments

The sequence-specific resonance assignment of tyrSSK was accomplished using 1H-1H NOESY and two- and three-dimensional heteronuclear experiments. The NH resonances were assigned using the NOE connectivities between NH proton resonances of neighboring base pairs. These connectivities are continuous from G2 to G5, from U47 to G16, and from G24 to G31. The NH resonance of G48 (G26 in tyrSHK) is present, but is weak and does not give rise to NOE cross peaks with U12 or U47. The cytidine and adenine NH2 resonances were assigned for tyrSHK and tyrSHS molecules using NOESY and HNCCH experiments 25.

The non-exchangeable 1H and 13C resonances of the RNA molecules were assigned using standard heteronuclear techniques 26, 27. Resonances for tyrSHK and tyrSHS were assigned first to facilitate assignment of tyrSSK. Most of the base and ribose 1' 1H-13C correlations are resolved, with some of the base resonances (G14, A15, A23, G24, and U47 H8-C8/H6-C6 and A23 H2-C2) having spectral characteristics indicative of intermediate exchange (Figure 2A). All residues except U22, A23, and G24 yielded base-ribose correlations in 3D HCN spectra, and most of the ribose spin systems could be identified using 3D HCCH-TOCSY experiments 28 .

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

(A) Two-dimensional 13C-1H HSQC spectrum of the base C6/8 and C2 regions of tyrSSK RNA molecule. The sequence-specific resonance assignments are shown. The A23 C2H2 cross peak is significantly weakened by chemical exchange. The U47 C6H6 and A15 and A46 C2H2 resonances also display moderate exchange broadening. The in vitro transcription reaction was primed with unlabeled 5'-GMP, therefore the G1 C8H8 does not appear in this spectrum. (B) Sequential connectivities through the base-1' region of the 180 ms mixing time two-dimensional NOE spectrum. The dotted lines trace the connectivities among the Specifier codon nucleotides U29-A31. The sequential connectivity is disrupted between steps A11-U12, A20-G21, G21-U22, and U47-G48 (boxes). The H1' resonances of U12, G24, and G32 are shifted upfield to 4.57, 4.17, and 4.42 ppm, respectively. These chemical shifts are characteristic of the nucleotides flanking the 3' side of the adenine of a sheared G-A base pair and the guanine of a UNCG tetraloop. See also Table S1.

Assignments for the non-exchangeable resonances were made using 2D NOESY (Figure 2B) and 3D 13C-edited NOESY experiments to identify sequential H6/8-H1' NOE connectivities 26. The sequential H6/8-H1' NOE connectivities are continuous in the 180 ms NOESY spectrum except at steps A11-U12, A20-G21, G21-U22, and U47-G48. However, G21H8–U22H6, G21H4'–U22H6, and A9H1'–A8H8 cross peaks are present in the spectrum. Interestingly, i to i+2 NOE cross peaks between A20H1'/H2' and U22H6 are observed (Figure 2B) and suggest that the G21 base bulges from the strand. The chemical shifts of U12 H1' (4.57 ppm), G24 H1' (4.17 ppm) and G21H4' (5.86 ppm) are unusual and are discussed below. In general, the chemical shifts of tyrSSK resonances are either similar or are identical with the corresponding resonances of the tyrSHK and tyrSHS hairpin molecules with a few notable exceptions. The C2H2 resonances of A17 and A40 (tyrSSK) have chemical shifts that correspond to A7 and A30 in the Mg2+-bound form of tyrSHS (discussed below). The U39 C6H6 also shows a similar displacement when compared with U29 of tyrSHS.

Several 31P resonances could be assigned for tyrSHK and tyrSHS using HCP 29 or 31P-1H hetero-TOCSY-NOESY spectra 30 and most are dispersed between −3.0 and −5.2 ppm. The G31pG32 resonance in the tetraloop has the expected chemical shift of −2.40 ppm 31. Two other resonances in tyrSHK, G10pA11 and G26pA27, exhibit even more dramatic down field shifts of −1.47 and −2.24, respectively. As no divalent metal ion was present in this sample, these shifts are indicative of the non-A-form character of the phosphate backbone in these regions 32. These unusually downfield-shifted resonances also are present in the tyrSSK 31P spectrum (G10pA11 and G48pA49), although complete sequence specific resonance assignment of the spectrum was not possible. The conservation of these unusual 31P chemical shifts between tyrSSK and tyrSHK indicates that the conformation the K-turn sequence region is largely preserved in the presence of the Specifier Loop domain.

Effects of Mg2+ on the tyrSSK RNA

Mg2+ ions are an integral part of RNA structure and function as they aid RNA folding, stabilize tertiary structure, and participate directly in catalysis. The glyQS leader RNA requires Mg2+ for correct folding 8 and the conformational equilibria of 23S rRNA helix 7 and 16S rRNA helix 23 K-turns are sensitive to Mg2+ 33, 34. The loop E motif in eukaryotic 5S rRNA is stabilized by Mg2+ 35, but Mg2+ has no effect on the same motif sequence located in the contexts of the sNRE and the hairpin ribozyme 36, 37. Interestingly, no metal ions are associated with the loop E motif in the crystal structure of the sarcin/ricin loop of 5S rRNA 38 nor in nearly all the K-turn motifs for which crystal structures are available 13, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 39.

The loop E motif and K-turn motif-containing molecules were examined for their response to Mg2+. The Mg2+-induced chemical shift changes for tyrSHS center on residues adjacent to the loop E motif in the Specifier Loop domain and are generally limited to less than 0.1 ppm for both 13C and 1H. Exceptions are the C18 and U39 C6 and A40 C8 resonances that shift upfield 0.8 ppm. The C18 H6 and C43 H5 resonances have shifts of 0.15 ppm and the H2 resonances of A17 and A40 shift 0.2–0.3 ppm downfield. The A19 H2 and A37 H2 resonances have chemical shift changes of ~0.1 ppm. A few resonances also exhibit line width changes indicative of exchange with addition of Mg2+. The C18, G21, U22, and C41 C6H6 resonances are broader in the presence of Mg2+, but the A23 C2H2 resonance sharpens. Among the 1' resonances, U39 and A40 each shift 1.0 ppm (13C) and 0.15 ppm (1H) downfield, and the A19, A20, U22, and A37 resonances exhibit modest broadening. The NOE cross peak intensity patterns in the presence of Mg2+ are qualitatively similar to those in spectra of the metal-free sample. This indicates that the local structural impact of Mg2+ is too small to be reflected in out qualitative classification of cross peak intensities and the corresponding inter-proton distances. However, the additive effects of small changes and effects on the phosphate backbone could lead to long-range helical distortions.

The Mg2+-induced chemical shift changes for tyrSHK (and the K-turn sequence region of tyrSSK) center on residues proximal to the C-stem of the K-turn. The A49 and A50 H8 resonances each shift upfield ~0.15 ppm and the A7–A9 H8, A50 H2, and C51 H6 resonances each shift downfield ~0.1 ppm. The A7 and A49 C2H2, U12 and U13 C6H6, and A50 C8H8 resonances also weaken significantly due to exchange broadening. The G10 C1' and C4' resonances shift upfield 0.2 ppm and downfield 0.2 ppm, respectively. The A49 C1' and C4' resonances shift downfield 0.7 ppm and upfield 0.4 ppm, respectively. These chemical shift changes indicate the amount of C2'-endo character of residues G10 and A49 increase and decrease, respectively, in the presence of Mg2+. The U12 H1' resonance broadens further with Mg2+ but its chemical shift is preserved, indicating that base stacking in much of the NC-stem is not altered by the metal ion association. Mg2+ also causes small changes to some of the NH resonances. The U13 and G48 NH resonances broaden significantly, but most other resonances exhibit only a slight degree of broadening. While accelerated exchange of the G48 NH resonance might be expected as Mg2+ either stabilizes or enhances the helix kink, the effect on the U13 NH resonance may be caused by a moderate increase in dynamics that also is manifest in the C6H6 resonance. The NH resonances of U12 and U47 shift ~0.1 ppm downfield, but the U12–U47 base pair is not otherwise altered.

Cobalt hexamine (Co(NH3)63+) was added to tyrSHK to more precisely define the site(s) of metal ion association through intermolecular NOEs. It was also expected that the higher charge density of Co(NH3)63+ relative to Mg2+ might more effectively stabilize an RNA conformation that is heterogeneous due to electrostatic repulsion of the phosphate backbone 40, 41. However, titration of tyrSHK with Co(NH3)63+ (up to 5 mM) again resulted in exchange broadening for residues of the K-turn sequence motif proximal to the C-stem and caused chemical shift perturbations similar to Mg2+. No inter-molecular NOEs between tyrSHK and Co(NH3)63+ could be definitively identified.

The hairpins tyrSHS and tyrSHK also were titrated with Mn2+ to identify the general location of divalent metal ion association around the Specifier Loop domain and K-turn sequence motif. The paramagnetic property of Mn2+ causes a distance dependent line broadening of resonances whose nuclei are less than about 10 Å away. The base 6 and 8 resonances of U6-G10, A20-G24, A46-A50, and G36 are broadened beyond detection at 50 µM. The base 8 resonances of A11, A20, and A37 and base 2 resonances of A7–A9 (tyrSHK) exhibit a moderate degree of broadening. The significant broadening of the base 6 and 8 resonances and modest effect on the adenine H2 resonances indicate that the Mn2+ positions itself along the minor groove of the phosphate backbone. Coordination of the ion to the phosphoryl oxygen atoms is consistent with the results from titration of tyrSHK with Co(NH3)63+ that indicate moderate affinity of Co(NH3)63+ for RNA and a position distal to RNA protons.

Although the spectral effects of Mg2+ for tyrSSK mirror those observed for the individual motif-containing RNA hairpins, two resonances of the Specifier Loop domain are noteworthy. The H2 resonances of A17 and A40 of tyrSSK in the absence of Mg2+ have chemical shifts that approximate those of the corresponding two resonances in tyrSHS in the presence of Mg2+. All of the other resonances of tyrSSK corresponding to nucleotides in tyrSHK have chemical shifts observed in the Mg2+-free form of tyrSHK. Notably, the addition of Mg2+ to tyrSSK shifts the A17 H2 resonance further downfield. Thus, replacement of the six base pair helix of tyrSHS with a nominal four base pair helix and K-turn motif may alter the base stacking at the proximal end of the Specifier Loop in a fashion similar to that of Mg2+.

Structure of tyrSSK

The structure of tyrSSK was calculated using a restrained molecular dynamics routine. The calculations used a total of 703 conformationally restrictive distance constraints and 222 dihedral angle constraints. RDC constraints for tyrSSK were obtained for Mg2+-free (71) and 7 mM Mg2+ (19) samples (Table 1). The average structure and a superposition of the Specifier Loop and K-turn sequence domains of the converged structures are shown in Figure 3. NOE-derived distance restraints were obtained from spectra of tyrSSK and from spectra of the individual tyrSHK and tyrSHS molecules where resonance overlap (mostly involving H2' and H3' resonances) was severe. The converged structures had an average of 7 distance constraint violations between 0.5 and 0.9 Å that were randomly distributed throughout the RNA molecule. None of the converged structures had NOE constraint violations >0.8 Å. The heavy atoms of the converged structures superimpose on the average structure with an average RMSD of 1.26 Å. The local RMSDs for the Specifier Loop (A17–A23 and G36-A42) and K-turn sequence region (A7-U12 and U47-A49) are 0.49 Å and 0.68 Å, respectively.

Table 1.

Summary of experimental distance and dihedral angle constraints and refinement statistics for tyrSSK.

Constraint tyrSsk
NOE distance constraints
      intraresiduea 324
      interresidue 401
      mean number per residue 13
NOE constraints by category
      very strong (1.8 – 2.8 Å) 6
      strong (1.8 – 3.8 Å) 194
      medium (1.8 – 4.8 Å) 268
      weak (1.8 – 6.0 Å) 186
      very weak (1.8 – 7.0 Å) 71
base pair constraints
      total 94
dihedral angle constraints
      ribose ringb 141
      backbone 222
      mean number per residue 6.6
Residual dipolar coupling constraints
      base CH 49
      ribose 1' CH 22
violations
      average distance constraints > 0.6 Åc 7
      average dihedral constraints > 0.5°d 16.6
RMSD from ideal geometrye
      Heavy Atoms (Å) 1.26
      Backbone Atoms (Å) 1.30
a

Only conformationally restrictive constraints are included.

b

Three torsion angles within each ribose ring were used to constrain the ring to either the C2'-endo or C3'-endo conformation. The ring pucker of residues A8, G10, G21, A23, G36, A38, G48, and A50 were not constrained.

c

A distance violation of 0.6 Å corresponds to 5.0 kcal energy penalty.

d

A dihedral angle violation of 0.5° corresponds to 0.05 kcal energy penalty.

e

Calculated against the minimized average structure.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Structure of the tyrSSK RNA oriented with the Specifier Loop domain above the K-turn sequence domain. Superposition of (B) the Specifier Loop domains and (C) the K-turn sequence domains from the 8 converged structures of tyrSSK. Views are into the minor groove at the center of the Specifier Loop domain and the major groove at the center of the K-turn sequence domain. The RMSDs between the individual structures and the average structure are listed in Table 1. The Specifier Loop and the K-turn sequence regions are generally well defined locally. The disorder of the bulged G21 base reflects the lower number of constraints for this residue.

The conformations of the K-turn sequence regions and flanking stem nucleotides (residues U6-G14 and C45-G50) are defined with good precision (0.82 Å rmsd) (Figure 3C and Table 1). The conformation of the Specifier Loop domain (residues G16–G24 and C35–C43) is similarly well-defined (0.63 Å rmsd) (Figure 3B and Table 1). The ribose ring puckers of several residues within the Specifier Loop domain and K-turn motif do not adopt A-form, C3'-endo, conformations. Residues A19, A20, U29, A42, and A49 adopt C2'-endo ring puckers and residues A8, G10, G21, A23, G26, A38, G48, and A50 exhibit conformations intermediate between C2'-endo and C3'-endo and are consistent with those identified in the isolated tyrS Specifier Loop domain 42. Within the prototypical K-turn structure, the C2'-endo pucker is conserved among the adenine nucleotides of the sheared G-A base pairs and the guanine nucleotide of the terminal G-A pair of the NC-stem. The puckers of several of the corresponding K-turn sequence residues of tyrSSK differ as the pucker of A11 is C3’-endo and G10 and G48 have ribose puckers that are C2'-endo/C3'-endo mixed.

The loop E and K-turn motifs of tyrSSK

The internal loop containing the Specifier Sequence within tyrSSK was shown to form a loop E structural motif when the loop is flanked by two regular helices 42. The loop E motif is characterized by three non-standard base pairs, a sheared A-G pair, a U-A trans-Hoogsteen interaction, and a parallel A-A base pair, that stack on one another 43, 44. In some cases, a bulged G or C nucleotide is present between the non-canonical U-A and A-A interactions. The nucleotide sequence of this motif in tyrSSK is similar to that found in several prokaryotic and eukaryotic rRNAs 44 and the hairpin ribozyme 45. The spectral data support the presence of the loop E motif in tyrSSK (Figure 4), but the arrangement of nucleotides is not as well-ordered as observed in other studies 38, 43, 46. The H1' resonance of G24 has a chemical shift of 4.17 ppm and is consistent with a sheared configuration between A23 and G36. The trans-Hoogsteen U-A arrangement inverts the orientation the uridine ribose ring relative to flanking residues and leads to an unusual feature in the NOESY spectrum, an NOE between the uridine H1' and the 5'(i-2) base proton. This characteristic interaction is observed as A20H8-U22H1'. Spectral signatures for the hydrogen bonds that compose the trans-Hoogsteen U-A pair, between UO2 and AN6H2 and between UN3H and AN7 44, could not be identified in either tyrSSK or tyrSSH. Adjacent to the U-A interaction is a parallel A-A base pair in which both adenine residues maintain the anti configuration about the glycosidic bond. This interaction is made possible by a reversal of the phosphate backbone between A20 and G21 38 that positions A20 in an antiparallel orientation relative to the rest of the strand. The reversal leads to a characteristic NOE pattern 43, 46 involving A20 that includes weak intensity A20 H4'-U22 H6 and A20 H4'-U22 H5 cross peaks and moderate intensity A20 H4'-U22 H1' and A20 H8-U22 H1' cross peaks. The parallel A-A base pair is stabilized by two symmetric N6H2-N7 inter-base hydrogen bonds 38, 44. The presence of the A38N6H2-A20N7 hydrogen bond is reflected in the significant downfield shifts of the A38N6 and A20N7 15N resonances, 84.2 and 237.0 ppm respectively, (Table S1) (Figure 4). Several i, i+2 NOE cross peaks between A20 and U22 indicate stacking of these residues and an extra-helical position of the G21 base.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Stereoview of the structure of the Specifier Loop domain. The Specifier Sequence bases are colored green and the loop E motif nucleotide bases are A20–A38 (pink), G21 (orange), U22-A37 (blue), and A23-G36 (brown). Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dotted red lines. The functional groups on the Watson-Crick edges of the specifier nucleotides are colored orange. The S turn of the sugar-phosphate backbone can be seen between residues A18-G21.

The bases of the Specifier Sequence (U39-A42) form an intra-strand stack that is continuous with A38, but not C43. The Watson-Crick edges of U39 and A40 are solvent exposed and point toward the minor groove whereas C41 and A42 are sequestered and point toward the helix axis (Figure 4). The remaining three nucleotides of the Specifier Loop domain (A27–A29) also show intra-strand stacking that is continuous with G26. No cross-strand interactions are observed between the partner strand nucleotides A27–A29 and U39-A42. The discontinuity of orientation between Specifier bases A40 and C41 necessitates a conformational rearrangement to align the Watson-Crick edges of these bases and allow pairing with the nucleotides of the tRNA anticodon loop.

The nucleotide sequence within tyrSSK that composes the second internal loop is similar to the sequences of RNA molecules that adopt the K-turn structural motif and include the U4 snRNA 47, ribosomal protein-RNA complexes 12, 13, 39, the S box riboswitch regulatory element 20, and the reverse K-turn element identified in Azoarcus group I intron 18. The C-stems and NC-stems of these K-turns are closed by C-G and sheared tandem G-A base pairs, respectively, and are separated by three- or four-nucleotide bulges (Figure 1C). This nucleotide sequence combination enables the formation of a significant bend (~120°) in the helix axis that is stabilized by protein-RNA or RNA-RNA contacts often distal to the turn itself 23. In isolation, the K-turn sequence motif has been observed to exist as a dynamic population of conformations 33 or to preferentially adopt an extended conformation 47. In the predicted secondary structure of tyrSSK, the C-stem is closed by a U-A base pair (Figure 1B). The formation of this base pair was inferred from peaks in the NOESY and HSQC spectra and is accommodated in the calculated structure of tyrSSK. Data supporting the presence of the sheared G-A base pairs is primarily in the form of chemical shifts. A spectral signature diagnostic of the sheared G-A pair that is stacked in a helix is an upfield shift of the H1' resonance of the residue 3' to the A 43, 46, 48, as seen for the G24 H1' that follows the A23-G36 pair in the Specifier Loop domain. The U12 H1' resonance exhibits this unusual shift (4.57 ppm) and is consistent with stacking against a sheared A11-G48 arrangement. However, the H1' chemical shift signature cannot be used to support the G10-A49 base pair. This base pair stacks against the A11-G48 but does not stack on the U6-A50 base pair that terminates the C-stem. Therefore, the relative orientation of the G10-A49 and U6-A50 base pairs would not produce the characteristic upfield shift of the A50 H1' resonance and indeed the chemical shift of this resonance in tyrSSK is 5.87 ppm. The sheared G-A arrangement has two hydrogen bonds, AN6H2-GN3 and AN7-GN2H2 (Figure 5). These hydrogen bonds shift the adenine N6 and N7 resonances downfield. The A49 N7 15N resonance has a significant downfield chemical shift of 233.9 ppm (comparable to the A20 and A38 N7 resonances that resonate at 234.3 and 236.9 ppm, respectively), but the remaining A11 and A49 N6 and N7 15N resonances exhibit shifts that reflect modest hydrogen bonding (Table S1). HNN experiments were used to probe the sheared G-A arrangements but failed to yield correlations that confirm the predicted hydrogen bonds. These results are consistent with sheared G-A base arrangements with weak hydrogen bonding.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Stereoview of the K-turn sequence region of the tyrSSK RNA molecule showing the arrangement of base-base interactions. Hydrogen bonds, supported by 15N chemical shifts, are indicated by dotted red lines. The U-U (pink) and G-A (brown) base pairs of the NC-stem stack against each other. The first and second unpaired adenine residues (cyan) stack on the closing A-U base pair (blue) of the C-stem. The third unpaired adenine (cyan) is shifted out from the helix center.

The remaining nucleotides of the GA loop region overlay well (0.68 Å r.m.s.d.) on one another among the converged structures (Figure 3C). The U12 and U47 residues that flank the A11-G48 sheared base pair in the NC-stem form an asymmetric U-U base pair . The U12-U47 base pair is arranged with the hydrogen bond pattern U12N3H-U47C2O and U47N3H-U12C4O (Figure S1). On the other side of the loop are three single strand adenine nucleotides, A7–A9. The base of A7 is displaced toward the helix axis and stacks on the loop-closing U6-A50 base pair. The base of A8 stacks on the A7 base (Figure 5). The base of A9 flips out of the helix and occupies a range positions among the converged structures. Between A8 and the G10-A49 base pair, the direction of the helix axis is broken. The positions of A7 and A8 appear to be stabilized by base stacking as none of the bulged adenine bases exhibit a consistent pattern of intra-molecular interactions.

The internal loop containing the K-turn sequence motif does not have spectral features compatible with the K-turn structural motif. Inter-strand base H2 to ribose H1' and H4' NOE cross peaks were identified between residues A11 and A49. The A49 H2-A11 H1' cross peak is the most intense and corresponds to a distance less than 3.5 Å. These data are consistent with stacking of the A11-G48 and G10-A49 similar to the two sheared G-A base pairs found in most K-turn structures 13, 15, 20, 21, 39. However, for a K-turn conformation, the base-base proton distances between sequential residues A7-G10 are predicted to be >9Å and would result in the discontinuity of sequential base-base NOE cross peaks around the junction of the C- and NC-stems. This loss of base-base or base-1' NOE continuity is not the case for either tyrSHK or tyrSSK. The K-turn structural motif also has conserved A-minor interactions involving the adenines of the sheared G-A base pairs, A11 and A49 in tyrSSK. For a K-turn structural motif, hydrogen bonds would be predicted between the 2'-OH of A7 and A50 and the N1 of A49 and A11, respectively 24. The N1 resonance chemical shifts of A11 and A49, 225.3 and 224.6, are comparable to those of A7–A9 and are consistent with N1 atoms not involved in intra-molecular hydrogen bonds (Table S1). Thus, evidence of the A-minor interactions conserved in K-turn conformations is absent. Table 2 compares 1H-1H NOE intensities observed for tyrSSK/tyrSHK and predicted intensities when the K-turn sequence motif is modeled using conserved K-turn fold features. Finally, the position of the G48 base in the tyrSSK structure extends across the helix (Figure 5). This position of the G48 base is supported by the G48 NH resonance that has an upfield chemical shift (10.05 ppm) and gives rise to several cross-strand NOE peaks. These spectral features are consistent with sequestration of the G48 imino proton and protection from rapid exchange with the solvent. The imino proton is not within hydrogen bond distance of phosphoryl oxygen atoms or ribose 2' OH groups of the partner strand that could similarly cause an upfield chemical shift and reduced solvent exchange.

Table 2.

Summary of NOE intensities between atom pairs that differ for tyrSSK and those expected for a prototypical kink-turn (distance in Å).

Atom pair tyrSSK K-turn-predicted
A8H8-A7H1' very weak (5.7) not observed a(10.3)
A8H8-A7H8 weak (4.9) not observed (12.0)
G10H8-A8H1' not observed (9.5) weak (5.0)
A7H1'-A49H2 not observed (8.0) strong (2.6)
A7H2-A8H1' medium (3.1) not observed (9.5)
A11H2-A50H1' not observed (7.0) medium (3.0)
a

Predicted distances have a range ± 0.5 Å and were estimated by examining K-turn structures kt-7 and kt-46 from 1S72 and the K-turn from 1T0K.

13C Relaxation measurements

In addition to potential structural effects, the K-turn sequence motif may alter the dynamic properties of the Specifier Loop domain and this can be manifest in the rapid time-scale motions of interatomic bonds. The reorientation of a 13C-1H bond vector on the picosecond time scale can be assessed through its carbon T relaxation: the longer the relaxation time, the more mobile the 13C-1H pair. Therefore, to test the effect of the K-turn sequence on residues in the Specifier Loop domain, T relaxation times for the base C2, C6, and C8 positions of the three hairpins were compared. Cross peak overlap and chemical exchange prevented accurate measurement for some of the nuclei, especially for tyrSSK. The majority of resonances from internal loop and stem residues have relaxation times between 40 and 60 ms, with those from tyrSSK approximately 10% shorter on average than the corresponding resonances of tyrSSH or tyrSKH. In general, no significant differences in the relaxation rates were identified for residues in the Specifier Loop domain or the K-turn sequence regions between the individual hairpins, tyrSSH and tyrSKH, and the full-length molecule, tyrSSK. One exception is the C8 resonance of the G16-C43 base pair that closes the Specifier Loop domain. The G16 C8H8 cross peak exhibits a modest degree of exchange broadening and so does not allow for direct comparison of relaxation with the C8 resonance of G6 in tyrSSH. The addition of Mg2+ increased chemical exchange among nucleotides in the K-turn sequence region, but did not significantly alter the relaxation profiles of resonances of tyrSSK (data not shown).

Isothermal titration calorimetry

The sequence elements corresponding to the K-turn sequence motif are crucial for read-through transcription in vivo 11 and the proximity of this sequence to the Specifier domain suggests that it contributes positively to the tRNA anticodon-Specifier nucleotide interaction. However, the structural and dynamical effects introduced by the K-turn sequence motif at the Specifier domain are small. Therefore, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was used to determine the affinity of the tRNA anticodon for the Specifier domain in the presence and absence of the K-turn sequence motif to assess possible thermodynamic contributions to the Specifier nucleotide-tRNA anticodon interaction.

The ITC measurements were performed using the anticodon stem-loop of tRNAGly, GCC (ASLGlyGCC) and hairpins corresponding to the glyQS Specifier Loop domain and glyQS Specifier Loop domain/K-turn sequence motif (Figure 6). This system was selected because and because the ASLGlyGCC anticodon bases do not contain natural base modifications 49 and the K-turn sequence motif for glyQS matches the consensus sequence of the K-turn that includes the terminal C-G base pair. The anticodon loop of tRNATyr contains multiple hypermodified bases 49 that may play a significant role in anticodon-Specifier Loop domain binding and introduce an additional layer of complexity. The affinity of ASLGlyGCC for the Specifier nucleotide sequence in the context of the K-turn sequence motif was determined to have Kd~ 2.5 µM, the same as that determined using fluorescence quenching 50. This affinity is only slightly stronger than the affinity of ASLGly, GCC for the Specifier nucleotide sequence in the absence of the K-turn motif (Kd~ 8 µM). As a negative control, the Specifier Sequence was mutated from GGC to GCC so that a C-C mismatch between the Specifier Sequence and anticodon would be introduced. This modification resulted in the loss of the anticodon-Specifier Loop domain interaction (Figure 6). The limited effect of the K-turn sequence on the affinity of the Specifier Loop domain-anticodon arm interaction is consistent with the marginal effects on the structure and dynamics of the Specifier Loop domain by the K-turn sequence and suggests a functional role for the K-turn sequence within the global architecture of the T box-tRNA complex.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

(A) Representative ITC experiment for the binding of the tRNAGly, GCC anticodon arm with the glyQS T box Specifier Loop domain. A 270 mM solution of and RNA hairpin corresponding to the glyQS T box Specifier loop and K-turn sequence motif (i) was titrated into 1.4 ml of a 22 mM solution of the anticodon arm of tRNAGly, GCC (iii). Both RNA molecules were in a buffer of 10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.8), 25 mM NaCl, and 10 mM MgCl2. For (A), the upper and lower panels correspond to the raw thermogram data and the integrated heat data for each injection (10 mL), respectively. Fitting of the data using a single-site binding model gave KA = 6.8 × 105 M−1, n = 1.1, ΔH = −16.8 kcal mol−1, and ΔS = −32.6 cal mol−1 K−1. (B) glyQS T box RNA constructs used for ITC experiments: (l-r) Specifier loop with the K-turn sequence motif, Specifier loop alone, and anticodon arm of tRNAGly, GCC.

DISCUSSION

Gram-positive bacteria employ the T box riboswitch mechanism to regulate expression of aminoacyl tRNA synthetase genes and genes involved in amino acid metabolism 1, 2, 3. Two common RNA structural motifs are highly conserved in Stem I of the T box riboswitch and both are crucial for proper transcriptional regulation of the tyrS operon 11, 51 . A loop E motif, located in the Specifier Loop domain, provides a stable platform that appears to help position the Specifier nucleotides to accept the anticodon of the cognate tRNA 42. A K-turn, or GA, sequence motif is joined to the Specifier Loop domain by a 3–5 base pair helix. Although transcription read-through in vivo is dependent upon the K-turn sequence element 11, its role in the T box regulatory mechanism has not been established.

Structure of conserved residues in the tyrS leader RNA Specifier Loop domain

The proximity of the K-turn sequence motif to the Specifier Loop domain suggests a possible role in facilitating tRNA binding by altering the conformations or dynamics of the Specifier Sequence nucleotides. The lower portion of stem I of the tyrS leader RNA that includes the Specifier Loop domain and a K-turn sequence motif overall is well-ordered with only a few nucleotides exhibiting a moderate degree of mobility. The nucleotides in the upper portion of the Specifier Loop domain of tyrSSK form a loop E structural motif. The Specifier Loop domain structure is similar to the structure of the isolated tyrS Specifier Loop domain. As previously observed 42, the structure of this domain is well-ordered, but the motif adopts a more open conformation than found in other loop E structural motifs 38, 43, 46. The hydrogen bonding pattern characteristic of the loop E fold is supported through 15N chemical shifts, but could not be mapped directly using cross-strand base-base correlation experiments that rely on strong and stable hydrogen bonds. These results are consistent with a less compact arrangement of nucleotides that would lead to longer and somewhat weaker hydrogen bonds.

The Specifier nucleotide bases are stacked, but their Watson-Crick edges are not uniformly displayed Figure 4. The bases of C41 and A42 are rotated toward the minor groove and readily accessible to the tRNA anticodon whereas U39 and A40 are rotated toward the major groove with their base pairing edges pointing toward the helix axis. This base arrangement also is adopted in tyrSHS, but differs somewhat from the arrangement adopted by a sequence variant (C16-G43) of the tyrS Specifier Loop domain 42. When the Specifier loop is closed by the C16-G43 base pair, the U39-to-C41 bases stack and rotate toward the minor groove. In addition, A42 does not stack with C41 but instead stacks on G43 with the Watson-Crick edge pointing toward the helix axis 42. The G16-C43 closing base pair of tyrSSK is representative of the highly conserved purine-pyrimidine (R16-Y43) arrangement at this position among T box riboswitches 7. Thus, the identity of the flanking base pair may serve to establish the placement of the Watson-Crick edge of the A42 base to readily pair with U33 of the incoming tRNATyr molecule.

The structure formed by the K-turn sequence motif in tyrSSK contains a three-nucleotide bulge and two sheared G-A base pairs, but the conformation is not reflective of the prototypical K-turn motif (Figure 7, Table 2). The sheared G-A base pairs are well-stacked in tyrSSK whereas the terminal sheared G-A pair of the canonical K-turn structure exhibits a significant roll angle relative to the penultimate G-A (Figure 7A). The K-turn kinks the phosphate backbone and creates a 120°-A angle between the helix axes of the C-stem and NC-stem, but the helix axis of tyrSSK is bent ~25°. Globally, the structure of this region of tyrSSK is similar to the structures of Watson-Crick RNA duplexes interrupted by three-nucleotide bulges 52, 53. Although the unpaired nucleotide bases tend stack on one another, the bend in the helix axis introduced by the asymmetric bulge is modest. The isolated K-turn sequence motifs from the spliceosomal U4 RNA and the mRNA binding site for yeast ribosomal protein L30 are the only other K-turn motifs to have been examined using solution NMR 47, 54. Alone, these motifs exhibit different dynamic properties and neither forms the canonical K-turn fold, although in the protein-bound state they adopt the prototypical fold. The spliceosomal U4 RNA K-turn has a well-ordered internal loop with an overall extended conformation similar to tyrSSK 47. Nucleotides within the internal loop of the K-turn element from the mRNA binding site for yeast ribosomal protein L30 are dynamic and do not adopt a unique and stable conformation 54. Interestingly, the strings of unpaired residues from the U4 and L30 kink-turn systems are adenine rich with nucleotide sequences 5'-AAU-3' and 5'-AGA-3', respectively. Unlike these sequences, though, the C-stem of tyrSSK is terminated by a U-A base pair rather than a C-G base pair. All experimentally established K-turns have a C-G base pair at the terminus of the C-stem 12. This G residue forms a type-1 A-minor interaction with the A of the penultimate G-A base pair, an interaction not achievable in this context by a U-A base pair. Although the type-1 A-minor interaction is not required to form the spliceosomal U4 RNA-15.5K protein complex 24, the functional importance of this interaction in other sequence contexts is unknown.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of (A) the K-turn sequence region of tyrSSK and (B) the K-turn from helix 7 (Kt-7) of H. marimortui 23S rRNA (PDB=1S72). In both structures, the first unpaired nucleotides (cyan) of the internal loops stack on the closing base pairs (blue) of the C-stems, the penultimate G-A base pair (brown) stacks with the neighboring base pair (pink) of the NC-stem, and the third unpaired nucleotide (green) of the internal loop lies outside the helix. In tyrSSK, the terminal G-A pair (orange) of the NC-stem stacks against the penultimate G-A pair whereas in Kt-7, the plane of the terminal G-A base pair is significantly tilted relative to the plane of the adjacent G-A pair. The angles between the axes of the C- and NC-stems are ~25° and 120° for tyrSSK and Kt-7, respectively.

Effect of Mg2+ on the tyrSSK structure

The consensus K-turn sequence motif has the intrinsic capacity to adopt the familiar K-turn fold, but this conformation appears to be stabilized by intra- or inter-molecular interactions involving the flanking RNA helices distal to the kink or interactions with proteins that bind K-turns 23. Indeed, FRET measurements have shown that the K-turn motif by itself can be dynamic and converts between linear and bent conformations and that these conformational states appear to be equally populated 33, 34. Those experiments also show that addition of Mg2+ displaces the population equilibrium towards the bent conformation 33, 55. The NMR results indicate that Mg2+ associates with the K-turn sequence motif with moderate affinity as some resonances begin to exhibit the effects of intermediate exchange with addition of Mg2+. The Mn2+ broadening pattern indicates that divalent metal ion(s) can bind proximal to the three unpaired adenines and that coordination involves the phosphate backbone rather than the base N or O atoms in the major or minor grooves. The distribution of atoms within the calculated structures creates a range of positions that could support the association of Mn2+ and would result in a resonance broadening pattern consistent with the experimental data.

Although the association of Mg2+ with the K-turn sequence motif of tyrSSK is weak and produces only minor effects on the NOE pattern, Mg2+ is predicted to increase the bend of the helix axis at the motif 33. Therefore, we examined the possibility that Mg2+ induces kinking of the helix axis using RDC data. The structure of tyrSSK was re-calculated using NOE distance restraints and RDCs derived from a Mg2+-containing. (Comparison of HSQC and 3D NOSEY-HSQC spectra reveals the local structures of the molecule in the two conditions appear very similar as manifest by chemical shifts, NOE cross peak identities, and cross peak intensities.) While much of the structure of tyrSSK is maintained in the presence of Mg2+, a significant bend is introduced when the structure is refined using Mg2+-derived RDCs (Figure 8A). Surprisingly, however, the bend occurs at the base of the Specifier Loop domain and not at the K-turn sequence motif. The location of the bend is coincident with the apparent highest affinity Mg2+ binding site within tyrSSK. It is particularly noteworthy that this bending leads to further rotation of the Specifier codon bases toward the minor groove side of the helix and thus increases the accessibility of the Watson-Crick edges of these residues for pairing with the tRNA anticodon nucleotides (Figure 8B,C). These nucleotides also show some of the biggest chemical shift changes (0.15–0.3 ppm 1H) in the presence of Mg2+. An overlay of the K-turn sequence regions of tyrSSK structures calculated using RDCs derived from Mg2+-containing and Mg2+-free buffer conditions indicates only small differences (1.6 Å r.m.s.d. for heavy atoms) whereas the r.m.s.d. for all residues of the structures in the two conditions is substantial (8.3 Å). The number and magnitude of the constraint violations for each set of structures are small with RDC Q-factors 0.12–0.15 for the two structures 56. Importantly, the Mg2+-free structures do not satisfy the constraints derived in the presence of Mg2+ and likewise the Mg2+-associated structures do not satisfy the constraints derived in the absence of Mg2+. The self-consistency between the structures and constraint sets supports Mg2+ as the conformational effector rather than the difference being caused by a limitation of either constraint set to define the overall structure.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

(A) Structures of tyrSSK RNA calculated using RDCs measured in the absence (green) and presence (orange) of Mg2+. The K-turn regions are superimposed. The bend in the helix axis created by Mg2+ occurs at the base of the Specifier Loop domain. Comparison of the Specifier Loop domains from (B) the Mg2+–free and (C) Mg2+–bound structures. The Watson-Crick edges of the Specifier bases (green) are rotated further towards the minor groove side of the helix in (C), increasing their accessibility to the bases of the tRNA anticodon loop.

Functional significance of the K-turn sequence motif

The loop E and K-turn structural motifs are common features of functional regions in RNA molecules. These elements serve as sites of protein and RNA recognition 13, 57. The K-turn sequence motif at the base of stem I of T box leader RNAs is conserved and has been demonstrated to be crucial for the regulatory function of the tyrS T box 11. In tyrSSK, the nucleotide sequence does not form the consensus K-turn sequence motif, a behavior also observed for the isolated K-turn sequences corresponding to the L30-mRNA binding site and the 15.5K protein binding site of the U4 snoRNA 47, 54. Unlike these later two molecules though, there is no evidence that links the K-turn element of the T box with a protein binding function. Indeed, the glyQS T box riboswitch, which also contains the K-turn sequence motif, retains its ability to attenuate transcription in an in vitro system that utilizes plasmid-derived DNA templates and the purified B. subtilis RNA polymerase 10. However, the interaction of the T box K-turn motif with protein(s) in vivo cannot be unequivocally excluded.

Our results do not support a role for the K-turn motif in tRNA-binding in which the motif acts directly on the Specifier Loop domain. The K-turn sequence does not alter the structure or dynamics of the Specifier Sequence in the absence or presence of Mg2+. The ITC results demonstrate that the K-turn sequence of the glyQS T box confers only a three-fold increase in the binding affinity between the glyQS Specifier Loop domain and the tRNAGly, GCC anticodon arm. This effect is in sharp contrast to the decreased level of antitermination activity (100–500 fold) in vivo caused by mutations predicted to disrupt the tyrS T box K-turn structure 11. Further, although the consensus sequence of the K-turn motif is not fully reproduced by tyrS K-turn sequence, the glyQS T box nucleotide sequence does match the consensus sequence. Although the K-turn sequence of tyrS does not form the classic K-turn fold in isolation, it may be stabilized once interactions elsewhere in the tRNA-Tbox complex have been established 20, 23. Other RNA molecules with nucleotide sequences that also do not match the consensus sequence have been found to adopt many of the structural features of the K-turn motif and include the Azoarcus group I intron that substitutes an A-A pair for the terminal G-A pair 18 and the K-turns in helices 11 and 23 of the 16S rRNA from T. thermophilus that substitute noncanonical A-A and non-Watson-Crick A-U pairs, respectively, for the penultimate G-A pairs 34, 39. We propose that formation of the structural motif occurs with the binding of tRNA to the T box riboswitch. The K-turn could then function to anchor the position of Stem I (and the Specifier Loop domain) relative to the antiterminator helix and result in greater T box-tRNA affinity to ensure transcription read-through.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

All enzymes were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO) except for T7 RNA polymerase which was prepared as described 58. Deoxyribonuclease I type II, pyruvate kinase, adenylate kinase, and nucleotide monophosphate kinase were obtained as powders, dissolved in 15% glycerol, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and stored at −20 °C. Guanylate kinase and nuclease P1 were obtained as solutions and stored at −20 °C. Unlabeled 5' nucleoside triphosphates (5'-NTPs) were purchased from Sigma, phosphoenolpyruvate (potassium salt) was purchased from Bachem, and 99% [15N]-ammonium sulfate and 99% [13C]-glucose were purchased from Spectra Stable Isotopes (Branchburg, NJ).

Preparation of RNA Samples

The RNA sequences shown in Figure 1B were prepared by in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase using synthetic DNA templates 59 and either unlabeled or 13C/15N -labeled 5'-NTPs 60. The RNA molecules were purified using 20% (w/v) preparative polyacrylamide gels, electroeluted (Schleicher & Schuell), and precipitated with ethanol. The purified RNA molecules were resuspended in 1.0 M KCl, 20 mM KPi, pH 6.8 and 2.0 mM EDTA and extensively dialyzed against 10 mM KCl, 5 mM KPi, pH 6.7 and 0.02 mM EDTA using a Centricon-3 concentrator (Millipore, Bedford, MA). All RNA samples were concentrated to a volume of 310 µL, lyophilized to powders, and resuspended in either 90% H2O/ 10% D2O or 99.96% D2O. The samples were then heated to 90 °C for 60 s and snap cooled on ice. The sample concentrations varied between 100 and 200 A260 O.D. in 310 µL (~0.9–2.2 mM). Partial alignment of 13C/15N-labeled RNA for residual dipolar coupling measurements was achieved by adding RNA to concentrated Pf1 filamentous phage in 99.96% D2O NMR buffer, yielding final concentrations of 14 mg/ml Pf1 and 0.4 mM RNA. The degree of alignment was quantified using the quadrupole splitting of the 2H2O resonance 61.

NMR Spectroscopy

All spectra were acquired on a Varian Inova 500 MHz spectrometer equipped with a 1H –[13C, 15N, 31P] probe and Inova 600 and 800 MHz spectrometers equipped with cryogenically cooled 1H –[13C, 15N] probes. Solvent suppression for 1H homonuclear spectra collected in 90% H2O was achieved using WATERGATE. Typically, the data points were extended by 25% using linear prediction for the indirectly detected dimensions. NMR spectra were processed and analyzed using Felix 2007 (Felix NMR Inc., San Diego, CA).

Two-dimensional (2D) 13C-1H HSQC spectra were collected to identify 13C-1H chemical shift correlations. Sugar spin systems were assigned using 3D HCCH-TOCSY (16 ms and 24 ms DIPSI-3 spin lock) experiments collected in D2O. A 3D HCCH-TOCSY (56 ms DIPSI-3 spin lock) was collected to establish the intra-base H2-C2-C8-H8 correlations in adenine residues 62. A 3D HCN experiment 63 was used to identify intra-residue base-ribose correlations.

Sequential assignments and distance constraints for the non-exchangeable resonances were derived at 28 °C from 2D 1H-1H NOESY spectra (τm = 120, 160, and 360 ms) and 3D 13C-edited NOESY spectra (τm = 120 and 320 ms). Pyrimidine C2 and C4 resonances were assigned from H6-C2 and H5-C4 correlations using 2D H(CN)C and 2D CCH-COSY experiments. 2D 15N-1H HSQC spectra optimized for 2-bond HN couplings were collected to identify purine N7 and adenine N1 and N3 resonances. H(CN)N experiments 64 were used to identify sheared A-A and G-A base pairs. For the exchangeable resonances, 2D 15N-1H HSQC spectra were collected to identify 15N-1H chemical shift correlations. 2D NOESY spectra (τm = 140 and 320 ms) were acquired in H2O and at 15 °C to obtain distance restraints involving exchangeable protons.

1H-13C residual dipolar coupling constants (RDCs) were determined from the measured frequency difference between corresponding proton doublets in HSQC spectra acquired for isotropic and partially aligned samples. 49 RDC values from base CH bond vectors and 22 from ribose 1' CH vectors were obtained in this way. The axial and rhombic terms were determined within Xplor-NIH using an extensive grid search 65, and yielded values of DaH=−24.93 and RhH=0.14.

3JH-H coupling constants were estimated for the individual RNA molecules containing the K-turn motif and Specifier Loop domain from DQF-COSY experiments. 3JC-P coupling constants were determined using the spin-echo difference method 66. 3JP-H couplings were estimated using 31P-1H HetCor experiments.

13C T relaxation times were measured using 2D 13C-1H ct-HSQC based experiments optimized for C2, for C1' and for C6 and C8 resonances. A 2.1 kHz 13C spin lock field was used with delays of 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 90, 120 ms. The 5 ms experiment was collected twice to provide an estimate of the error of the measured intensities. The 13C-1H cross peak volumes were fitted to a single exponential decay.

Distance and torsion angle constraints

Inter-proton distance estimates were obtained from cross peak intensities in 2D NOESY and 3D 13C-edited NOESY spectra. Cross peak intensities were calibrated using the pyrimidine H5-H6 fixed distance of 2.5 Å. NOE cross peak intensities were classified into five categories assigned upper distance bounds of 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, or 7.0 Å and a common lower bound of 1.8 Å. Base pairs were identified by direct detection of hydrogen bonds 67 or by observation of strong G-C NH–NH2 or A-U H2–NH NOEs. Hydrogen bonding for the U-U interaction adjacent to the K-turn motif was derived from chemical shift data (Figure S1). Hydrogen bonds distances restraints and planarity constraints were introduced for residues that form base pairs.

Ribose ring pucker and backbone dihedral constraints were derived from 3JHH, 3JHP, and 3JCP couplings 68. Ribose rings with 3JH1’–H2’ > 7 Hz and with C3' and C4' resonances between 76–80 and 85–86 ppm, respectively, were constrained to C2'-endo (A19, U29, C30, and A49. Residues with 3JH1’–H2’ < 5 Hz and couplings were constrained to C3'-endo. Residues with either intermediate 3JH1’–H2’ couplings or for which no data were available (A8, G10, G21, A23, G36, A42, G48, and A50) were left unconstrained. For stem residues G1-C55 to U6-A50, U12–U47 to G16-C33, and G24-C35 to C27-G32, was constrained to the gauche+ conformation (60 ± 30°). For residues A7, A9, and G10,γ was loosely constrained to the trans conformation (−150 to 150). γ was left unconstrained for all other residues. β was constrained to the trans conformation (170 ± 40°) for most duplex and Specifier Loop domain residues except G21 and A27 that were constrained loosely to gauche+ (80 ± 50°) as determined from examination of loop E containing crystal structures 38. βwas loosely constrained to the trans conformation (160 ± 50°) for internal loop residues was constrained to exclude the gauche+ conformation (−150 ± 50°) for residues with 3JP-H3’ > 5 Hz or 3JP-C2’ > 5 Hz 66. α and ζ were constrained to −70 ± 60° for the stem residues (G1-C55 to U6-A50, U13-A46 to G16-C43, and G24-C35 to C27-G32). Tetraloop residues were constrained similarly with the exceptions α for U29 and G31 of −150 ± 60 and 60 ± 60, respectively, and ζ for C30 and G31 of 30 ± 60 and 60 ± 60, respectively. For all other residues α and ζ were constrained to exclude the trans conformation (0 ± 120°) based on the absence of down-field shifted 31P resonances 32, with the exceptions of ζ for A20 and G21 where the trans conformation was allowed. α and ζ between G10-A11 and G48-A49 were not constrained due to the downfield shifted 31P resonance to allow the trans conformation.

Structure refinement

Structure refinement was carried out with simulated annealing and restrained molecular dynamics (rMD) calculations were performed using Xplor-NIH v2.19 65. Starting coordinates for the tyrSSK and tyrSHK models were generated using Insight II (Accelrys, San Diego, CA) and were based on standard A-form helical geometry. The structure calculations were performed in two stages. Beginning with the energy minimized starting coordinates, 100 structures were generated during the first round of structure calculation by 80 ps of rMD at 1200K with hydrogen bond, NOE-derived distance and base-pairing restraints. The system then was cooled to 25 K in 47 cycles of rMD corresponding to a total of 12 ps. During this stage, RDC constraints and repulsive van der Waals forces were introduced into the system and the SANI force constraint used for RDCs was gradually increased from 0.010 kcal mol−1 Hz−2 to 1.000 kcal mol−1 Hz−2. Other force constants used for the calculations were increased—from 2 kcal mol−1 Å−2 to 30 kcal mol−1 Å−2 for the NOE and from 1 kcal mol−1 rad−2 to 100 kcal mol−1 rad−2 for the dihedral angle constraints. Once the temperature reached the target, each structure was then subjected to another round of constrained minimization 56. Twenty structures were selected for the final refinement. The criteria for final structure selection included lowest energies, fewest constraint violations, and fewest predicted unobserved NOEs (1H pairs less than 3.5 Å apart, but no corresponding cross peak in the NOE spectra). A second round of rMD was performed on these structures using protocols similar to those used in the first round of structure calculation. The major difference was the starting temperature of 300 K followed by cooling to 25 K over 28 ps of rMD. The eight refined structures were analyzed using Xplor-NIH and Insight II.

Isothermal Titration Calorimetry

A titration calorimeter (MicroCal, Inc.) was used for the ITC experiments. RNA hairpins tyrSHS and tyrSSK with the UAC Specifier nucleotide triplet replaced with GGC were synthesized using T7 RNA polymerase as described above. A 17 nt RNA hairpin corresponding to the anticodon arm of tRNAGly, GCC also was similarly prepared. RNA samples were extensively dialyzed against a buffer of 10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.8) and 25 mM NaCl. RNA samples were heated to 90 °C for 60 s, snap cooled on ice and dialyzed against 10 mM potassium phosphate, 25 mM NaCl, and 10 mM MgCl2. The concentrations of RNA in the injection syringe and sample cell were 270 µM and 22 µM, respectively. For the titration experiments, thirty 10 µL injections into 1.5 mL sample cell volume were performed with 5 minutes between injections. The sample was stirred constantly at 290 rpm and the temperature was set to 12 °C. Control titrations (forward and reverse) 69 were performed and yielded similar results. No binding was observed in the absence of Mg2+. However, the ASLGly, GCC adopts a relatively compact tri-loop structure that relaxes and becomes dynamic when Mg2+ is added (Chang and Nikonowicz, unpublished). Therefore, Mg2+ has a role at the level of the ASL anticodon loop, but do not know if Mg2+ makes additional contributions.

The ITC data was analyzed using the vendor-supplied software (ORIGIN v7.0) and plots of ΔH versus mole ratio were generated from the raw thermograms. The final 3–5 points from each experiment were extrapolated to obtain a straight line that was subtracted from all the data before determining ΔH, (the overall reaction enthalpy), KA (association constant), and n (reaction stoichiometry) by fitting the points using a nonliner least squares model for a single binding site.

Supplementary Material

01
02
03

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Malgorzata Michnicka for preparation of the T7 RNA polymerase and synthesis of the labeled 5'-nucleotide triphosphates and Andrew Chang for assistance with collecting the ITC data. The 800 MHz NMR spectrometer was purchased with funds from the W. M. Keck Foundation and the John S. Dunn Foundation.

Abbreviations

NMR

nuclear magnetic resonance

NTP

nucleoside triphosphate

NOE

nuclear Overhauser effect

NOESY

NOE spectroscopy

2D

two dimensional

3D

three dimensional

HSQC

heteronuclear single quantum coherence

RMSD

root mean square deviation

NH

imino

NH2

amino

nt

nucleotide

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

This work was supported by Welch Foundation grant C-1277 to E.P.N. and by National Institutes of Health grant GM73969 to E.P.N.

Accession Numbers

Coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession number PDB ID: 2KZL

Chemical shifts have been deposited in the Biomolecular Magnetic Resonance Bank under accession number BMRB ID: 17316

REFERENCES

  • 1.Henkin TM. Transcription termination control in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2000;3:149–153. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00067-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Henkin TM. Riboswitch RNAs: using RNA to sense cellular metabolism. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3383–3390. doi: 10.1101/gad.1747308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grundy FJ, Henkin TM. tRNA as a positive regulator of transcription antitermination in B. subtilis. Cell. 1993;74:475–482. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80049-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grundy FJ, Rollins SM, Henkin TM. Interaction between the acceptor end of tRNA and the T box stimulates antitermination in the Bacillus subtilis tyrS gene: a new role for the discriminator base. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:4518–4526. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.15.4518-4526.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grundy FJ, Hodil SE, Rollins SM, Henkin TM. Specificity of tRNA-mRNA interactions in Bacillus subtilis tyrS antitermination. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:2587–2594. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.8.2587-2594.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grundy FJ, Moir TR, Haldeman MT, Henkin TM. Sequence requirements for terminators and antiterminators in the T box transcription antitermination system: disparity between conservation and functional requirements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1646–1655. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.7.1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vitreschak AG, Mironov AA, Lyubetsky VA, Gelfand MS. Comparative genomic analysis of T-box regulatory systems in bacteria. Rna. 2008;14:717–735. doi: 10.1261/rna.819308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yousef MR, Grundy FJ, Henkin TM. Structural transitions induced by the interaction between tRNA(Gly) and the Bacillus subtilis glyQS T box leader RNA. J Mol Biol. 2005;349:273–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Grundy FJ, Henkin TM. Conservation of a transcription antitermination mechanism in aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and amino acid biosynthesis genes in gram-positive bacteria. J Mol Biol. 1994;235:798–804. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grundy FJ, Winkler WC, Henkin TM. tRNA-mediated transcription antitermination in vitro: codon-anticodon pairing independent of the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:11121–11126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162366799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Winkler WC, Grundy FJ, Murphy BA, Henkin TM. The GA motif: an RNA element common to bacterial antitermination systems, rRNA, and eukaryotic RNAs. Rna. 2001;7:1165–1172. doi: 10.1017/s1355838201002370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schroeder KT, McPhee SA, Ouellet J, Lilley DM. A structural database for k-turn motifs in RNA. Rna. 2010;16:1463–1468. doi: 10.1261/rna.2207910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Klein DJ, Schmeing TM, Moore PB, Steitz TA. The kink-turn: a new RNA secondary structure motif. Embo J. 2001;20:4214–4221. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.15.4214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lescoute A, Leontis NB, Massire C, Westhof E. Recurrent structural RNA motifs, Isostericity Matrices and sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:2395–2409. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Vidovic I, Nottrott S, Hartmuth K, Luhrmann R, Ficner R. Crystal structure of the spliceosomal 15.5kD protein bound to a U4 snRNA fragment. Mol Cell. 2000;6:1331–1342. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)00131-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schultz A, Nottrott S, Hartmuth K, Luhrmann R. RNA structural requirements for the association of the spliceosomal hPrp31 protein with the U4 and U4atac small nuclear ribonucleoproteins. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:28278–28286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603350200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Omer AD, Zago M, Chang A, Dennis PP. Probing the structure and function of an archaeal C/D-box methylation guide sRNA. Rna. 2006;12:1708–1720. doi: 10.1261/rna.31506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Adams PL, Stahley MR, Kosek AB, Wang J, Strobel SA. Crystal structure of a self-splicing group I intron with both exons. Nature. 2004;430:45–50. doi: 10.1038/nature02642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Blouin S, Lafontaine DA. A loop loop interaction and a K-turn motif located in the lysine aptamer domain are important for the riboswitch gene regulation control. Rna. 2007;13:1256–1267. doi: 10.1261/rna.560307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Montange RK, Batey RT. Structure of the S-adenosylmethionine riboswitch regulatory mRNA element. Nature. 2006;441:1172–1175. doi: 10.1038/nature04819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chao JA, Williamson JR. Joint X-ray and NMR refinement of the yeast L30e-mRNA complex. Structure. 2004;12:1165–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2004.04.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Strobel SA, Adams PL, Stahley MR, Wang J. RNA kink turns to the left and to the right. Rna. 2004;10:1852–1854. doi: 10.1261/rna.7141504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Antonioli AH, Cochrane JC, Lipchock SV, Strobel SA. Plasticity of the RNA kink turn structural motif. Rna. 2010;16:762–768. doi: 10.1261/rna.1883810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Szewczak LB, Gabrielsen JS, Degregorio SJ, Strobel SA, Steitz JA. Molecular basis for RNA kink-turn recognition by the h15.5K small RNP protein. Rna. 2005;11:1407–1419. doi: 10.1261/rna.2830905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Simorre J-P, Zimmermann GR, Mueller L, Pardi A. Triple-Resonance Experiments for Assignment of Adenine Base Resonances in 13C/15N-Labeled RNA. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1996;118:5316–5317. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pardi A. Multidimensional heteronuclear NMR experiments for structure determination of isotopically labeled RNA. Methods in Enzymology. 1995;261:350–380. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(95)61017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dieckmann T, Feigon J. Assignment methodology for larger RNA oligonucleotides: application to an ATP-binding RNA aptamer. Journal of Biomolecular NMR. 1997;9:259–272. doi: 10.1023/a:1018622708674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Nikonowicz EP, Pardi A. An efficient procedure for assignment of the proton, carbon and nitrogen resonances in 13C/15N labeled nucleic acids. J Mol Biol. 1993;232:1141–1156. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Heus HA, Wijmenga SS, van de Ven FJM, Hilbers CW. Sequential Backbone Assignment in 13C-Labeled RNA via Through-Bond Coherence Transfer Using Three-Dimensional Triple Resonance Spectroscopy (1H,13C,31P) and Two-Dimensional Hetero TOCSY. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1994;116:4983–4984. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kellogg GW, Schweitzer BI. Two- and three-dimensional 31P-driven NMR procedures for complete assignment of backbone resonances in oligodeoxyribonucleotides. J Biomol NMR. 1993;3:577–595. doi: 10.1007/BF00174611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Allain FH, Varani G. Structure of the P1 helix from group I self-splicing introns. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1995;250:333–353. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gorenstein DG. Phosphorus-31 NMR: Principles and Applications. New York: Academic Press; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Goody TA, Melcher SE, Norman DG, Lilley DM. The kink-turn motif in RNA is dimorphic, and metal ion-dependent. Rna. 2004;10:254–264. doi: 10.1261/rna.5176604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schroeder KT, Lilley DM. Ion-induced folding of a kink turn that departs from the conventional sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:7281–7289. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Serra MJ, Baird JD, Dale T, Fey BL, Retatagos K, Westhof E. Effects of magnesium ions on the stabilization of RNA oligomers of defined structures. Rna. 2002;8:307–323. doi: 10.1017/s1355838202024226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rupert PB, Ferre-D'Amare AR. Crystal structure of a hairpin ribozyme-inhibitor complex with implications for catalysis. Nature. 2001;410:780–786. doi: 10.1038/35071009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Finger LD, Trantirek L, Johansson C, Feigon J. Solution structures of stem-loop RNAs that bind to the two N-terminal RNA-binding domains of nucleolin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:6461–6472. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Correll CC, Freeborn B, Moore PB, Steitz TA. Metals, motifs, and recognition in the crystal structure of a 5S rRNA domain. Cell. 1997;91:705–712. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80457-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wimberly BT, Brodersen DE, Clemons WM, Jr, Morgan-Warren RJ, Carter AP, Vonrhein C, Hartsch T, Ramakrishnan V. Structure of the 30S ribosomal subunit. Nature. 2000;407:327–339. doi: 10.1038/35030006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Misra VK, Draper DE. The linkage between magnesium binding and RNA folding. J Mol Biol. 2002;317:507–521. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2002.5422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cabello-Villegas J, Tworowska I, Nikonowicz EP. Metal ion stabilization of the U-turn of the A37 N6-dimethylallyl-modified anticodon stem-loop of Escherichia coli tRNAPhe. Biochemistry. 2004;43:55–66. doi: 10.1021/bi0353676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang J, Henkin TM, Nikonowicz EP. NMR structure and dynamics of the Specifier Loop domain from the Bacillus subtilis tyrS T box leader RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:3388–3398. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Dallas A, Moore PB. The loop E-loop D region of Escherichia coli 5S rRNA: the solution structure reveals an unusual loop that may be important for binding ribosomal proteins. Structure. 1997;5:1639–1653. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00311-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Leontis NB, Westhof E. A common motif organizes the structure of multi-helix loops in 16 S and 23 S ribosomal RNAs. J Mol Biol. 1998;283:571–583. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Butcher SE, Burke JM. Structure-mapping of the hairpin ribozyme. Magnesium-dependent folding and evidence for tertiary interactions within the ribozyme-substrate complex. J Mol Biol. 1994;244:52–63. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Johansson C, Finger LD, Trantirek L, Mueller TD, Kim S, Laird-Offringa IA, Feigon J. Solution structure of the complex formed by the two N-terminal RNA-binding domains of nucleolin and a pre-rRNA target. J Mol Biol. 2004;337:799–816. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Falb M, Amata I, Gabel F, Simon B, Carlomagno T. Structure of the K-turn U4 RNA: a combined NMR and SANS study. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:6274–6285. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tolbert BS, Kennedy SD, Schroeder SJ, Krugh TR, Turner DH. NMR structures of (rGCUGAGGCU)2 and (rGCGGAUGCU)2: probing the structural features that shape the thermodynamic stability of GA pairs. Biochemistry. 2007;46:1511–1522. doi: 10.1021/bi061350m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Juhling F, Morl M, Hartmann RK, Sprinzl M, Stadler PF, Putz J. tRNAdb 2009: compilation of tRNA sequences and tRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D159–D162. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nelson AR, Henkin TM, Agris PF. tRNA regulation of gene expression: interactions of an mRNA 5'-UTR with a regulatory tRNA. Rna. 2006;12:1254–1261. doi: 10.1261/rna.29906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rollins SM, Grundy FJ, Henkin TM. Analysis of cis-acting sequence and structural elements required for antitermination of the Bacillus subtilis tyrS gene. Mol Microbiol. 1997;25:411–421. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4851839.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Diener JL, Moore PB. Solution structure of a substrate for the archaeal pre-tRNA splicing endonucleases: the bulge-helix-bulge motif. Mol Cell. 1998;1:883–894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hermann T, Patel DJ. RNA bulges as architectural and recognition motifs. Structure. 2000;8:R47–R54. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(00)00110-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mao H, Williamson JR. Assignment of the L30-mRNA complex using selective isotopic labeling and RNA mutants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:4059–4070. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.20.4059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Matsumura S, Ikawa Y, Inoue T. Biochemical characterization of the kink-turn RNA motif. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:5544–5551. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Clore GM, Kuszewski J. Improving the accuracy of NMR structures of RNA by means of conformational database potentials of mean force as assessed by complete dipolar coupling cross-validation. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:1518–1525. doi: 10.1021/ja028383j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Owens RA, Baumstark T. Structural differences within the loop E motif imply alternative mechanisms of viroid processing. Rna. 2007;13:824–834. doi: 10.1261/rna.452307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Davanloo P, Rosenberg AH, Dunn JJ, Sturdier FW. Cloning and expression of the gene for bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1984;81:2035–2039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Milligan JF, Groebe DR, Witherell GW, Uhlenbeck OC. Oligoribonucleotide synthesis using T7 RNA polymerase and synthetic DNA templates. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15:8783–8798. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.21.8783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Nikonowicz EP, Sirr A, Legault P, Jucker FM, Baer LM, Pardi A. Preparation of 13C and 15N Labelled RNAs for Heteronuclear Multi-Dimensional NMR Studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 1992;20:4507–4513. doi: 10.1093/nar/20.17.4507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hansen MR, Mueller L, Pardi A. Tunable alignment of macromolecules by filamentous phage yields dipolar coupling interactions. Nat Struct Biol. 1998;5:1065–1074. doi: 10.1038/4176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Legault P, Farmer BT, II, Mueller L, Pardi A. Through-bond correlation of adenine protons in a 13C-labeled ribozyme. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1994;116:2203–2204. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Marino JP, Diener JL, Moore PB, Griesinger C. Multiple-Quantum Coherence Dramatically Enhances the Sensitivity of CH and CH2 Correlations in Uniformly 13C-Labeled RNA. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1997;119:7361–7366. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Majumdar A, Kettani A, Skripkin E, Patel DJ. Pulse sequences for detection of NH2…N hydrogen bonds in sheared G . A mismatches via remote, non-exchangeable protons. J Biomol NMR. 2001;19:103–113. doi: 10.1023/a:1008311624772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Schwieters CD, Kuszewski JJ, Tjandra N, Clore GM. The Xplor-NIH NMR molecular structure determination package. J Magn Reson. 2003;160:65–73. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(02)00014-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Legault P, Jucker FM, Pardi A. Improved measurement of 13C, 31P J coupling constants in isotopically labeled RNA. FEBS Letters. 1995;362:156–160. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00232-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dingley AJ, Grzesiek S. Direct observation of hydrogen bonds in nucleic acid base pairs by internucleotide 2JNN couplings. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1998;120:8293–8297. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Varani G, Aboul-ela F, Allain FHT. NMR investigation of RNA structure. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 1996;29:51–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Salim NN, Feig AL. Isothermal titration calorimetry of RNA. Methods. 2009;47:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
02
03

RESOURCES