Skip to main content
The Journal of Infectious Diseases logoLink to The Journal of Infectious Diseases
. 2011 Feb 1;203(3):316–323. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiq066

Varicella Zoster Disease of the Central Nervous System: Epidemiological, Clinical, and Laboratory Features 10 Years after the Introduction of the Varicella Vaccine

Barbara A Pahud 1,3,, Carol A Glaser 2, Cornelia L Dekker 3, Ann M Arvin 3, D Scott Schmid 4
PMCID: PMC3071104  PMID: 21177308

Abstract

Background. Since the introduction of live attenuated varicella zoster virus (VZV) vaccine in 1995 there has been a significant reduction in varicella incidence and its associated complications, but the impact on VZV-associated central nervous system (CNS) disease has not been assessed.

Methods. In this descriptive study we evaluated patients referred to the California Encephalitis Project from 1998 to 2009 with VZV PCR-positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data were collected using a standardized case form. Specimens were genotyped using multi-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis.

Results. Twenty-six specimens were genotyped from patients 12–85 years of age (median, 46 years). Clinical presentations included meningitis (50%), encephalitis (42%), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (8%). Only 11 patients (42%) had a concomitant herpes zoster rash. Genotype analysis identified 20 European Group (Clade1, Clade 3) strains; 4 Asian (Clade 2) strains, and 2 Mosaic Group (Clade 4, Clade VI) strains. One specimen was recognized as vaccine strain by identifying vaccine-associated SNPs.

Conclusions. VZV continues to be associated with CNS disease, with meningitis being the most frequent clinical presentation. CNS VZV disease often presented without accompanying zoster rash. Sequencing data revealed multiple genotypes, including 1 vaccine strain detected in the CSF of a young patient with meningitis.


Varicella vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1995 [1]. According to the National Immunization Survey, single-dose varicella vaccine coverage in the United States reached 90% in 2007 [2]. Although a single dose of varicella vaccine provided high levels of protection and greatly reduced the incidence of varicella, it was inadequate to prevent all varicella outbreaks and breakthrough disease among vaccinated children. To further reduce varicella disease incidence and its complications in the United States, a second dose of varicella vaccine was recommended in 2007 [3]. The additional dose of vaccine is expected to confer improved protection for the 15% - –20% of children who responded inadequately to the first dose.

Even though complications involving the central nervous system (CNS) are rare following natural VZV infection, VZV was found to be the most common etiological agent associated with encephalitis, meningitis and myelitis prior to vaccine introduction [4]. Significant reductions in varicella complications and deaths have been documented since the introduction of live attenuated VZV vaccine [5]. The impact of varicella vaccination on CNS disease, however, has not been reported. Neurological complications of VZV infection are important to recognize due to the morbidity and mortality associated with them and potential benefit in some with antiviral treatment [6]. While vaccine strain VZV can reactivate in rare instances to cause herpes zoster (HZ), only 6 cases of vaccine-associated VZV CNS disease have been reported in the literature [713]. Too few cases of vaccine-associated CNS diseases have been described to know whether the clinical presentation differs from disease caused by wild virus. Thus, genotyping and strain surveillance is essential in distinguishing wild type and vaccine strain infections.

The California Encephalitis Project (CEP) was initiated in 1998 to better understand the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of encephalitis in California. Referral of patients to the CEP is open to all hospitals and physicians in California. Although the original emphasis was on immunocompetent patients with encephalitis, specimens from immunocompromised patients and patients with a range of CNS disorders other than encephalitis are referred voluntarily by physicians throughout California because a standardized panel of diagnostic tests (including VZV PCR in CSF) is performed routinely by the State Laboratory.

The objectives of our study were to identify patients from the CEP whose cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples tested positive for VZV by PCR in order to (1) describe the clinical and laboratory features of VZV CNS disease in the post-vaccine era, (2) perform genotyping on all available samples to better understand the epidemiology of VZV CNS disease in California, and (3) identify VZV vaccine strain specimens and describe their clinical presentation.

METHODS

Between July 1998 and July 2009, samples from 4290 patients were voluntarily referred to the CEP by physicians from 249 facilities throughout California. A core battery of tests was performed on specimens obtained from all patients referred. Details about CEP testing are described elsewhere [14]. We retrospectively identified patients whose CSF samples tested positive for VZV: at least 1 CSF sample was received and tested from 94% of patients (n = 4021), and of these, 43 (1%) tested positive for VZV by PCR. Frozen aliquots of CSF were available on 33 of these patients and sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for genotype analysis. The CDC was unable to genotype 2 specimens and 5 tested negative. Genotyping was successfully performed on the remaining 26 CSF specimens according to the following protocol: total DNA was extracted from CSF samples using the MagNa Pure LC automated DNA purification system with the Tissue DNA Purification Kit (Roche Diagnostics), and recovered in a final volume of 100 μL of elution buffer. To verify VZV positive specimens and to discriminate vaccine Oka from wild-type VZV, at least 4 FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer)-based real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols targeting 4 vaccine-associated single base polymorphisms in ORF38 (69348), ORF54 (94167), and ORF62 (106262, 107252, and 108111) were performed on the LightCycler platform (Roche Diagnostics) [15, 16]. Genotyping was performed using conventional PCR targeting polymorphic regions in ORF21, ORF22, and ORF50 as reported elsewhere [17, 18]. Automated DNA sequencing was performed with the ABI PRISM 377 Genetic Analyzer (Perkin Elmer). All base positions are based on the published complete genome sequence for Dumas strain (GenBank accession no. gi: 9625875). Clades of varicella are referred to using the newly revised nomenclature adopted in 2008 [19].

Clinical information was obtained from the CEP case history form. This form includes information on demographics, exposures, travel history, laboratory findings, and clinical characteristics. Additional clinical information was requested when data were missing. Immunization histories were requested for all pediatric patients. Neurologic syndromes were classified into 3 primary groups. Patients were considered to have encephalitis as per CEP case definition [14] if they were hospitalized with encephalopathy (defined by a depressed or altered level of consciousness lasting more than 24 h, lethargy, a personality change, or ataxia) with 2 or more of the following characteristics: fever, seizure, focal neurological findings, pleocytosis, or electroencephalography or neuroimaging findings consistent with encephalitis. Patients were classified as having meningitis or ADEM based on the Brighton Collaboration Case Definitions [20, 21]. Activities of the California Encephalitis Project were reviewed by the California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects.

RESULTS

Patient Characteristics

Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data for the 26 patients whose CSF specimens were confirmed positive for VZV and genotyped are summarized in Table 1. Individual patient characteristics are shown in Table 2. Patients ranged in age from 12 to 85 years old, with a median age of 46.5 years. Seven (27%) were <18 years of age, 10 (38%) were adults between the ages of 27–60, and 9 (35%) were over the age of 60. The majority of patients (53%) were white, non-Hispanic, followed by Hispanic (19%). Sixteen patients (62%) reported no underlying immune deficiency. However, 5 of those (19%) were >60 years and thus expected to have declining VZV-specific T cell-mediated immunity (immunosenescence) [22, 23]. Ten patients (38%) reported primary or secondary causes of immunodeficiency, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (n = 5), immunosuppressant drugs (n = 4), and asplenia (n = 1).

Table 1.

Summary of Characteristics and Findings for 26 cases Positive for VZV by PCR on CSF, 1998–2009

Characteristic All(n=26) Meningitis(n=13) Encephalitis(n=11) ADEM(n=2)
Demographic
Male 13 (50%) 6 (46%) 7 (64%) 0
Age, years, median (range) 46.5 (12–85) 16 (12–60) 75 (50–85) 39 (27–51)
Race
    White 13 (50%) 3 (23%) 10 (90%) 1 (50%)
    Hispanic 6 (23%) 4 (31%) 0 (0%) 1 (50%)
    Asian 2 (8%) 2 (15%) 0 0
    Black 1 (4%) 1 (8%) 1 (10%) 0
    Other/Unknown 4 (15%) 3 (23%) 0 0
Immune Status
Immunosenescent 10 (23%) 1 (8%) 9 (82%) 0
Asplenia 1 (4%) 0 1 (10%) 0
Immunosuppressant drugs 4 (15%) 1 (8%) 2 (18%) 1 (50%)
HIV 5 (19%) 2 (15%) 2 (18%) 1 (50%)
Clinical
Herpes Zoster rash 11(42%) 3 (23%) 7 (64%) 1 (50%)
ICU admission 8 (31%) 0 7 (64%) 1 (50%)
Fever 12 (46%) 6 (46%) 5 (45%) 1 (50%)
Altered mental status/lethargy 13(50%) 3 (23%) 9 (82%) 1 (50%)
Ataxia 5 (19%) 0 4 (36%) 1 (50%)
Cranial nerve abnormality 5 (19%) 1 (8%) 4 (36%) 0
Laboratory
CSF WBC count, cells/mm3, median (range) 267 (6–1615) 365 (7–1110) 107 (20–1615) 7.5 (6–9)
Lymphocytes 52 (0–100) 91 (0–100) 62.5 (10–92) 1.5 (0–3)
Monocytes 10 (0–100) 10 (0–100) 24 (2–49) 28.5 (23–34)
Neutrophils 0 (0–92) 0 7 (0–92) 70 (63–77)
CSF Protein level, mg/dL , median (range) 89 (18–1096) 87 (18–147) 262 (44–1096) 52.5 (46–59)
CSF glucose level, mg/dL, median (range) 48 (36–107) 45 (38–80) 55 (36–107) 71 (59–83)
Abnormal CNS Imaging
5 (19%) 0 3 (27%) 2 (100%)

Table 2.

Individual characteristics of 26 CEP cases positive for VZV by PCR on CSF and confirmed by genotyping, 1998–2009

Age (years) Sex Race/Ethnicity Genotype Herpes Zoster CNS Imaging ImmuneStatus CNS Presentation
12 F Hispanic Clade 2 Vaccine Strain Yes Normal (CT) Immunocompetent Meningitis
13 M White(non-Hispanic) Clade 3 No Normal (MRI) Immunosuppressive agent Meningitis
14 M Asian/Pacific Islander Clade 2 No Normal (CT) Immunocompetent Meningitis
15 F Unknown Clade 2 Yes Normal (MRI) Immunocompetent Meningitis
15 F White(non-Hispanic) Clade 1 Yes Normal (MRI) Immunocompetent Meningitis
16 F Hispanic Clade 1 No Normal (CT) Immunocompetent Meningitis
16 F Hispanic Clade 1 No Normal (CT) Immunocompetent Meningitis
27 F Hispanic Clade 2 No Spinal MRI: abnormal signal within the cord from T1 to T4-5 Brain MRI: T2 hyperintensity and enhancement of temporal lobe area HIV ADEM
27 M Unknown Clade 1 No Not done HIV Meningitis
30 M Unknown Clade 3 No Normal (CT) Immunocompetent Meningitis
33 M Black Clade 1,3 No Normal (MRI) HIV Meningitis
43 M Hispanic Clade 3 No Normal (MRI) Immunocompetent Meningitis
43 F White(non-Hispanic) Clade 1,3 No Normal (MRI) Immunocompetent Meningitis
50 M White Clade 3 Yes Brain MRI: increased signal in left fronto-temporal lobe Immunocompetent Encephalitis
51 F White(non-Hispanic) Clade 3 Yes Brain MRI: Left occipital lobe enhancing lesion. Spinal MRI: T12 thoracic cord lesion, abnormal thickened nerve root Immunosuppressive agent ADEM
53 F White Clade 3 No Brain MRI: Diffuse meningeal enhancement HIV Encephalitis
60 F White Clade 1 No Normal (MRI) Immunocompetent Meningitis
66 F White (Hispanic) Clade 1 Yes Normal (CT) Immunosuppressive agent, Immunosenescent Encephalitis
74 M White Clade 1,3 Yesa Brain MRI: Old infarct, findings related to age Immunosenescent Encephalitis
75 M White(non-Hispanic) Clade 1 Yes Brain CT (pt w/stainless steel implants): mild subcortical leukoencephalopathy, mild cerebral atrophy Immunosenescent Encephalitis
75 M White(non-Hispanic) Clade 1 Yes Brain MRI: Atrophy and white matter changes related to age Immunosuppressive agent, Immunosenescent Encephalitis
76 F White(non-Hispanic) Clade VI No Normal (MRI) Immunosenescent Encephalitis
77 M Other Clade 4 No Normal (MRI) Immunosenescent Encephalitis
78 F White(non-Hispanic) Clade 1 Yes Brain MRI: leptomeningeal enhancement compatible with encephalitis/meningitis, and 3 parenchymal hematomas (2 in R frontal lobe, 1 in L parietal lobe) HIV, Immunosenescent Encephalitis
83 M White(non-Hispanic) Clade 3 Yes Normal (CT) Asplenia, Immunosenescent Encephalitis
85 M White(non-Hispanic) Clade 1,3 Yes Brain MRI: Atrophy and old lacunar infarcts compatible with age Immunosenescent Encephalitis

NOTE. a This patient presented with a rash not diagnosed as HZ but described in a trigeminal distribution that we believe to be consistent with HZ.

CNS Presentation

Three different CNS presentations were observed: meningitis (50%), encephalitis (42%), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) (8%). Meningitis was the most common CNS presentation, seen in 91% (10/11) of immunocompetent patients ≤60 years of age. Encephalitis was the most common CNS presentation, seen in 67% (10/15) of patients with immunodeficiency and/or immunosenescent. ADEM was only seen in 2 immunocompromised patients (HIV and immunosupressant drugs).

CSF

A complete CSF WBC differential was obtained in 23 of 26 patients (Table 1). Lymphocytic predominance was observed in 52% of patient cases, while monocytes predominated in 26% and neutrophils in 22%. One HIV positive patient had two CSF samples that tested positive for VZV 8 days apart despite acyclovir treatment.

Imaging

Neuroimaging studies were obtained in 25 of 26 patients; 80% (20/25) were reported as normal (n = 17) or showing abnormalities consistent with old age (n = 3). Abnormal imaging findings (5/25) included 2 patients with diffuse meningeal enhancement; 1 patient with abnormal spinal cord signal as well as enhancement of the temporal lobe area (patient was HIV-positive and had positive PCR on CSF for cytomegalovirus [CMV], VZV, and herpes simplex virus [HSV]); 1 patient with increased signal in fronto-temporal region (CSF HSV PCR negative); and 1 patient with enhancing occipital lobe and thoracic/lumbar lesions as well as abnormal thickened nerve roots.

Rash

Eleven (42%) patients had a rash diagnosed by the referring clinicians as HZ, and 14 (54%) patients presented without any rash. One additional patient (4%) presented with a rash not diagnosed as HZ but described in a trigeminal distribution that we believe to be consistent with HZ. Of the 15 patients with immunodeficiency and/or immunosenescent, 53% (8/15) presented with HZ and 47% (7/15) presented without. Of the 11 patients reported to be immunocompetent and ≤60 years old, 36% (4/11) presented with a HZ rash and 64% (7/11) presented without.

Vaccine History

Of the 7 pediatric patients (ages 12–16), 4 had a history of at least 1 dose of varicella vaccine. Two children had a history of varicella (10 months of age and 18 months of age) and thus were not immunized. The remaining child was unimmunized with no clinical history of varicella disease prior to this presentation.

Genotype

VZV genotypes were defined using the SNP profiles illustrated in Figure 1. Genotype analysis identified 20 European Group strains (Clade 1, Clade 3); 4 Asian strains (Clade 2), 1 of which was Oka vaccine strain; and 2 Mosaic Group strains, 1 Clade 4 and 1 Clade VI. Of the 20 E strains, 9 were Clade 1 and 7 were Clade 3, but we were unable to amplify DNA from either ORF21 or ORF50 to discriminate Clade 1 from Clade 3 in 4 cases (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiles for the VZV genotypes identified in this study. The base positions for the SNP are based on the published sequence for the Dumas strain (GenBank accession no. XO4370). The principle reference strain for each clade is indicated in parentheses. Clade VI is provisional; no complete genome sequences are currently available.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Distribution of VZV genotypes identified in this study. The vaccine strain was differentiated from other clade 2 viruses by evaluating vaccine specific SNP at positions 106262 and 107252 (ORF62), and genotyping SNP at ORF38 (PstI site), ORF54 (BglI site) and sequence analysis of targeted regions in ORF21, ORF22, and ORF50. Clade 1/Clade 3 indicates European group isolates that could not be further characterized due to failure to amplify the regions in ORF21 and ORF50.

Vaccine Strain Case

The Oka vaccine strain identified was isolated from a 12-year-old previously healthy girl who presented with HZ rash, fever, elevation in liver transaminases, and meningitis (Table 3). She was treated with 7 days of acyclovir and recovered uneventfully. Her vaccination history was remarkable for a single varicella vaccination at the age of 1 year. Identification of this Oka vaccine strain represents the seventh published, laboratory-confirmed association of varicella vaccine with later CNS disease, and the longest interval from vaccination to presentation (11 years) reported to date.

Table 3.

Reported Cases of CNS Disease Associated with VZV Vaccine Strain

Case no. Age Health status at onset Interval from vaccine to onset Clinical Presentation Time from HZ to CNS disease Treatment and outcome Reference
1 15 months Neuroblastoma diagnosed day of vaccination, chemotherapy began 5 days after immunization 3 months prior HZ and meningitis (Skin and CSF PCR plus vaccine strain) Approximately 4 months Treated initially with acyclovir (but VZV resistant) and foscarnet (intermittently). HZ lesions persisted for months. Lesions resolved after transplant, autologous frozen stem cells, and VZV IG given. 10
2 3 ½ years Previously healthy 20 months HZ ophtalmicus and encephalitis (CSF PCR plus vaccine strain) 4 days Treated with acyclovir and recovered. 11, 13
3 4 years Previously healthy 32 months prior HZ right arm and meningitis (skin PCR plus wild type, CSF PCR plus vaccine strain) 3 days Treated with acyclovir and recovered. 7
4 4 years Maintenance chemotherapy for ALL 19 months prior HZ C6-C7 dermatome and meningitis (skin and CSF PCR plus vaccine strain) NA Treated with acyclovir and recovered. 7, 12
5 8 years Previously healthy 7 years prior HZ left shoulder and meningitis (CSF PCR plus vaccine strain) 4 days Treated with acyclovir x 2 days and discharged, but readmitted 3 days later due to recrudescence of CNS symptoms. Repeat LP was negative for VZV, received acyclovir 7 days and recovered. 9
6 9 years Previously healthy 8 years prior HZ left C5-C6 dermatome and meningitis (CSF PCR plus vaccine strain) 5 days Treated with acyclovir and recovered. 8
7 12 years Previously healthy 11 years prior C4-C5 dermatome and meningitis (CSF PCR plus vaccine strain) 5 days Treated with acyclovir and recovered. In this publication.

DISCUSSION

After implementation of routine universal varicella vaccination in early childhood in the United States, CNS disease caused by VZV still occurs and, albeit rarely, can result from the reactivation of vaccine virus. However, the epidemiology of CNS VZV disease appears to be changing. Studies performed in different regions of the world prior to licensure of the varicella vaccine found VZV to be a leading cause of childhood encephalitis [2427]. Encephalitis was infrequently seen among our pediatric cohort (2 pediatric cases among the 17 without genotyping data presented with encephalitis). Even though acute cerebellar ataxia is the most common complication of VZV infection in children [28], no cases were reported in this cohort, most likely due to referral bias. All children with specimens genotyped in this study (n = 7) presented with meningitis. In contrast, VZV is now recognized as one of the leading causes of adult encephalitis. Indeed, in 2 recent encephalitis studies, VZV was the second most common etiology identified, second only to HSV [29, 30]. All patients older than 60 years (n = 9) with specimens genotyped in this study presented with encephalitis. Among our cases, VZV CNS disease frequently presented without the characteristic HZ rash. The clinical implications are important because VZV may not be considered in the differential diagnosis of a patient presenting without a rash with CNS disease as routinely as HSV, and antiviral medications thus may be prematurely discontinued once HSV is ruled out. In fact, VZV CNS disease can resemble HSV encephalitis clinically and on neuroimaging as illustrated by 2 of our patients who had temporal lobe abnormalities, a characteristic finding of HSV but not usually associated with VZV [31].

VZV isolates are classified based on their geographic distribution as European Group (Clade 1, Clade 3), Asian (Clade 2), and Mosaic Group (Clade 4, Clade 5, Clade VI, and Clade VII). There are currently at least 5 and possibly as many as 7 distinctive genotypes identified: Clades 1–5, and provisional genotypes Clade VI and Clade VII [18, 19, 32]. The vaccine strain belongs to Clade 2 and can be differentiated from wild-type VZV by identifying vaccine-associated single base pair polymorphisms as described in our methods. In a global survey of more than 300 VZV isolates, Clade 2 strains were identified only in Japan and Hawaii [17]. Several more recent studies failed to detect Clade 2 isolates in multiple countries in Europe, but 13% of isolates evaluated in Australia were Clade 2 viruses [17, 18, 32, 33]. While the overall numbers of isolates evaluated worldwide remains relatively small, it is striking that Clade 2 viruses have never been observed in areas with predominantly European descent that have limited immigration and have not yet been shown to be circulating in the United States. The emerging premise is that countries with a history of European colonization that have received large numbers of Asian immigrants in recent decades are undergoing a shift in the distribution of VZV genotypes, with increasing numbers of Clade 2 strains. The observation of 3 wild-type Clade 2 isolates in this small study may support this notion. Of the 3 cases with wild-type clade 2 cases, all were young (likely reflecting more recent infection trends), one had no recorded ethnicity or travel history, and the other 2 cases, 1 Hispanic and 1 Asian/Pacific Islander, denied any international travel. More detailed information on these cases can be found in Table 2. Notably, the Clade 2 strains detected in this study as wild-type using ORF21/ORF22/ORF50 genotyping would have been identified as vaccine genotype using only ORF38/ORF54-based genotyping (BglI+, PstI−), a method that is still in use for the identification of vaccine strain among clinical isolates [34, 35]. Another important finding was the identification of Clade VI strain, previously not seen in the United States but found in Spain and France [32]. Sequencing data from the 26 VZV isolates reported here show that all VZV genotypes can be involved in CNS disease.

Only 1 of 26 isolates genotyped in this study was identified as the Oka vaccine strain. Six additional cases of CNS disease associated with VZV vaccine strain have been reported in the literature (Table 3), with 2 additional cases of vaccine meningitis confirmed more recently, 1 in Japan (identified in 2008, unpublished data) and 1 in Minnesota (in press). The previously reported cases ranged in age from 15 months to 9 years old. Four children were previously healthy, and 2 were immunocompromised. Length of time from vaccine administration to presentation ranged from 3 months to 8 years. Our case is the oldest reported (12 years old) and had the longest interval to reactivation (11 years). Even though only 7 cases of vaccine-associated CNS diseases are described to date, it is interesting to note that most patients presented with meningitis, and all were preceded by HZ (median time of 4.5 days) prior to CNS symptoms. Based on this very limited number of cases, clinical presentation of vaccine strain reactivation does not appear to differ from wild-type VZV CNS disease, making the diagnosis of vaccine strain reactivation difficult based on clinical presentation alone. The small number of cases reported may also suggest that the vaccine strain is less virulent in the CNS than the wild-type virus. However, the actual number of cases due to VZV vaccine strain reactivation is most likely higher than the number of cases that have been laboratory-confirmed, making any conclusion premature. This highlights the importance of continuing genotyping and strain surveillance studies to distinguish wild-type and vaccine strain infections.

One of the important limitations of this study is that the CEP is not a population-based study. The CEP is more likely biased toward patients that are severely ill and that are diagnostically challenging [14]. For example, cases that presented with a characteristic rash of VZV and CNS symptoms are likely underrepresented in this sample. Similarly immunocompromised hosts are likely underrepresented since the focus of the project is the immunocompetent host.

In summary, after implementation of routine universal varicella vaccination in the United States, all but 1 case of VZV associated CNS disease observed in this cohort study were due to reactivation of the wild-type virus. Sequencing data from the 26 VZV isolates reported here show that all VZV genotypes can be involved in CNS disease. Our report of a seventh patient with VZV vaccine strain reactivation is similar to cases previously reported, although the time to reactivation, causing HZ and meningitis in an otherwise healthy young girl, was 11 years. In contrast to wild-type VZV CNS illness, which most often causes encephalitis in children, VZV vaccine strain is more often associated with meningitis. This presentation cannot be differentiated from natural VZV CNS disease clinically, emphasizing the importance of sequencing and genotyping.

Funding

This study was funded through a subcontract with America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) under contract 200-2002-00732 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Network and under CDC Emerging Infections Program (U50/CCU015546-09).

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the CEP for their respective contributions to the project and Kay Radford at the CDC for performing PCR and genotyping.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control Prevention. Prevention of varicella: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1996;45:1–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lopez AS, Kolasa MS, Seward JF. Status of school entry requirements for varicella vaccination and vaccination coverage 11 years after implementation of the varicella vaccination program. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(suppl 2):S76–81. doi: 10.1086/522139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Marin M, Guris D, Chaves SS, Schmid S, Seward JF. Prevention of varicella: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007;56:1–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koskiniemi M, Rantalaiho T, Piiparinen H, et al. Infections of the central nervous system of suspected viral origin: A collaborative study from Finland. J Neurovirol. 2001;7:400–8. doi: 10.1080/135502801753170255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Seward JF, Watson BM, Peterson CL, et al. Varicella disease after introduction of varicella vaccine in the United States, 1995–2000. JAMA. 2002;287:606–11. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.5.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nagel MA, Gilden DH. The protean neurologic manifestations of varicella-zoster virus infection. Cleve Clin J Med. 2007;74 doi: 10.3949/ccjm.74.7.489. 489–94, 496, 498–9, 502–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chaves SS, Haber P, Walton K, et al. Safety of varicella vaccine after licensure in the United States: Experience from reports to the vaccine adverse event reporting system, 1995–2005. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(suppl 2):S170–7. doi: 10.1086/522161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Iyer S, Mittal MK, Hodinka RL. Herpes zoster and meningitis resulting from reactivation of varicella vaccine virus in an immunocompetent child. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53:792–5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Levin MJ, DeBiasi RL, Bostik V, Schmid DS. Herpes zoster with skin lesions and meningitis caused by 2 different genotypes of the Oka varicella-zoster virus vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2008;198:1444–7. doi: 10.1086/592452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Levin MJ, Dahl KM, Weinberg A, Giller R, Patel A, Krause PR. Development of resistance to acyclovir during chronic infection with the Oka vaccine strain of varicella-zoster virus, in an immunosuppressed child. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:954–9. doi: 10.1086/378502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chouliaras G, Spoulou V, Quinlivan M, Breuer J, Theodoridou M. Vaccine-associated herpes zoster ophthalmicus [correction of opthalmicus] and encephalitis in an immunocompetent child. Pediatrics. 2009;125:e969–72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Galea SA, Sweet A, Beninger P, et al. The safety profile of varicella vaccine: A 10-year review. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(suppl 2):S165–9. doi: 10.1086/522125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goulleret N, Mauvisseau E, Essevaz-Roulet M, Quinlivan M, Breuer J. Safety profile of live varicella virus vaccine (Oka/Merck): Five-year results of the European Varicella Zoster Virus Identification Program (EU VZVIP) Vaccine. 2010;28:5878–82. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Glaser CA, Honarmand S, Anderson LJ, et al. Beyond viruses: Clinical profiles and etiologies associated with encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:1565–77. doi: 10.1086/509330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Loparev VN, McCaustland K, Holloway BP, Krause PR, Takayama M, Schmid DS. Rapid genotyping of varicella-zoster virus vaccine and wild-type strains with fluorophore-labeled hybridization probes. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4315–9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.12.4315-4319.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lopez AS, Burnett-Hartman A, Nambiar R, et al. Transmission of a newly characterized strain of varicella-zoster virus from a patient with herpes zoster in a long-term-care facility, West Virginia, 2004. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:646–53. doi: 10.1086/527419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Loparev VN, Gonzalez A, Deleon-Carnes M, et al. Global identification of three major genotypes of varicella-zoster virus: Longitudinal clustering strategies for genotyping. J Virol. 2004;78:8349–58. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.15.8349-8358.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Loparev VN, Rubtcova EN, Bostik V, et al. Identification of five major and two minor genotypes of varicella-zoster virus strains: A practical two-amplicon approach used to genotype clinical isolates in Australia and New Zealand. J Virol. 2007;81:12758–65. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01145-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Breuer J, Grose C, Norberg P, Tipples G, Schmid DS. A proposal for a common nomenclature for viral clades that form the species varicella-zoster virus: Summary of VZV Nomenclature Meeting 2008, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, 24-25 July 2008. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:821–8. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.017814-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sejvar JJ, Kohl KS, Bilynsky R, et al. Encephalitis, myelitis, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM): Case definitions and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2007;25:5771–92. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tapiainen T, Prevots R, Izurieta HS, et al. Aseptic meningitis: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2007;25:5793–802. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miller AE. Selective decline in cellular immune response to varicella-zoster in the elderly. Neurology. 1980;30:582–7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.6.582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Burke BL, Steele RW, Beard OW, Wood JS, Cain TD, Marmer DJ. Immune responses to varicella-zoster in the aged. Arch Intern Med. 1982;142:291–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang D, Bortolussi R. Acute viral infection of the central nervous system in children: An 8-year review. Can Med Assoc J. 1981;125:585–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nicolosi A, Hauser WA, Beghi E, Kurland LT. Epidemiology of central nervous system infections in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1950-1981. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:399–408. doi: 10.1093/infdis/154.3.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cizman M, Jazbec J. Etiology of acute encephalitis in childhood in Slovenia. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12:903–8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199311000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Koskiniemi M, Korppi M, Mustonen K, et al. Epidemiology of encephalitis in children. A prospective multicentre study. Eur J Pediatr. 1997;156:541–5. doi: 10.1007/s004310050658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guess HA, Broughton DD, Melton LJ, III, Kurland LT. Population-based studies of varicella complications. Pediatrics. 1986;78:723–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huppatz C, Durrheim DN, Levi C, et al. Etiology of encephalitis in Australia, 1990-2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1359–65. doi: 10.3201/eid1509.081540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mailles A, Stahl JP. Infectious encephalitis in france in 2007: A national prospective study. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1838–47. doi: 10.1086/648419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tien RD, Felsberg GJ, Osumi AK. Herpesvirus infections of the CNS: MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:167–76. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.1.8390790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Loparev V, Martro E, Rubtcova E, et al. Toward universal varicella-zoster virus (VZV) genotyping: Diversity of VZV strains from France and Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:559–63. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01738-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Koskiniemi M, Lappalainen M, Schmid DS, Rubtcova E, Loparev VN. Genotypic analysis of varicella-zoster virus and its seroprevalence in Finland. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007;14:1057–61. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00348-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.LaRussa P, Lungu O, Hardy I, Gershon A, Steinberg SP, Silverstein S. Restriction fragment length polymorphism of polymerase chain reaction products from vaccine and wild-type varicella-zoster virus isolates. J Virol. 1992;66:1016–20. doi: 10.1128/jvi.66.2.1016-1020.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jean-Philippe P, Freedman A, Chang MW, et al. Severe varicella caused by varicella-vaccine strain in a child with significant T-cell dysfunction. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e1345–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES