Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2008 Nov 26;60(1):137–151. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern271

Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration ameliorates effects of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis and leaf structure of Aster tripolium L.

Nicole Geissler 1,*, Sayed Hussin 1, Hans-Werner Koyro 1
PMCID: PMC3071763  PMID: 19036838

Abstract

This study investigated the interaction of NaCl-salinity and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on gas exchange, leaf pigment composition, and leaf ultrastructure of the potential cash crop halophyte Aster tripolium. The plants were irrigated with five different salinity levels (0, 25, 50, 75, 100% seawater salinity) under ambient and elevated (520 ppm) CO2. Under saline conditions (ambient CO2) stomatal and mesophyll resistance increased, leading to a significant decrease in photosynthesis and water use efficiency (WUE) and to an increase in oxidative stress. The latter was indicated by dilations of the thylakoid membranes and an increase in superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity. Oxidative stress could be counteracted by thicker epidermal cell walls of the leaves, a thicker cuticle, a reduced chlorophyll content, an increase in the chlorophyll a/b ratio and a transient decline of the photosynthetic efficiency. Elevated CO2 led to a significant increase in photosynthesis and WUE. The improved water and energy supply was used to increase the investment in mechanisms reducing water loss and oxidative stress (thicker cell walls and cuticles, a higher chlorophyll and carotenoid content, higher SOD activity), resulting in more intact thylakoids. As these mechanisms can improve survival under salinity, A. tripolium seems to be a promising cash crop halophyte which can help in desalinizing and reclaiming degraded land.

Keywords: Aster tripolium, cash crop halophyte, elevated CO2, gas exchange, oxidative stress, photosynthesis, salt tolerance, ultrastructure, water use efficiency

Introduction

The CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has increased due to anthropogenic emissions from 280 ppm to approximately 380 ppm since the beginning of industrialization, and it will continue to rise in future (IPCC, 2007). The well-known consequences are the greenhouse effect and global climate change manifesting itself for example in higher temperatures of the earth's surface and in an increase in extreme weather events such as heat waves or droughts (http://www.mpimet.mpg.de/fileadmin/grafik/presse/ClimateProjektions2006.pdf; IPCC, 2007). Due to rising temperatures, higher solar radiation, and decreasing and/or more irregular precipitation patterns, climate change exacerbates soil degradation and desertification, especially in arid and semi-arid areas (Yeo, 1999; van Ittersum et al., 2003; IPCC, 2007). In turn, desertification is often accompanied by soil salinization which today affects 7% of the global total land area (Szabolcs, 1994) and 20–50% of the global irrigated farmland (Tanji, 2002; Hu and Schmidhalter, 2005), leading to growth conditions inacceptable for most conventional crops (Choukr-Allah and Harrouni, 1996).

A promising solution to the problems mentioned above is the desalinization and reclamation of degraded land by making sustainable use of naturally salt-tolerant halophytes under seawater irrigation (including drainage mechanisms which avoid salt accumulation in the soil) (Pasternak, 1990; Lieth et al., 1999; Lieth and Mochtchenko, 2002; Koyro, 2003). These plants, also called cash crop halophytes, have a high potential for utilization as they can be used for various economic and ecological purposes (Güth, 2001; Lieth and Mochtchenko, 2002). One of the ecological benefits of sustainable use is the fact that every new large plant population which is created for long-lasting use may sequester CO2 and thus counteract the greenhouse effect. This is true even for annual or biannual species such as A. tripolium if the part of the biomass which is not utilised (in our case the roots) remains permanently in the soil. On the other hand, halophytes are likely to be promising crop plants in a future with rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations because elevated CO2 can enhance their salt tolerance and productivity (Ball and Munns, 1992; Urban, 2003). This becomes clear when looking at the effects of NaCl salinity and of elevated CO2 concentration on plants. The four major constraints of salinity on plant growth are osmotic effects, restriction of CO2 gas exchange, ion toxicity, and nutrient imbalance (Greenway and Munns, 1980; Koyro, 2003). As a consequence, on the one hand halophytes have to maintain ion homeostasis under saline conditions which can be achieved by selective ion transport and ion compartmentation. On the other hand, osmotic stress due to the low water potential of saline soils forces plants to minimize water loss because growth depends on the ability to find the best trade-off between a low transpiration and a high net photosynthetic rate (Koyro, 2006). However, various halophyte species show a clearly reduced assimilation rate under saline conditions due to stomatal closure (Huchzermeyer and Koyro, 2005). A consequence can be an increase in oxidative burst (Lovelock and Ball, 2002), especially in C3 plants which are particularly susceptible to photorespiration and thus to oxidative stress. However, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can be regulated by the amount and composition of photosynthetic pigments (Moorthy and Kathiresan, 1999, in Koyro, 2006), and generated ROS can be scavenged by the antioxidative system which includes enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase (Blokhina et al., 2003).

Compared with salinity, elevated CO2 concentration has contrary effects on C3 plants. It often improves photosynthesis while reducing stomatal resistance, thus increasing water use efficiency, but decreasing photorespiration and oxidative stress (Urban, 2003; Kirschbaum, 2004; Rogers et al., 2004). Therefore salt tolerance can be enhanced under elevated CO2 (Ball and Munns, 1992; Wullschleger et al., 2002; Urban, 2003). According to literature, this is probably the case for A. tripolium as well, a promising potential cash crop halophyte which can be used for food (the leaves have a high nutritional value and can be eaten as salad or vegetable), for fodder, and as an ornamental plant (Güth, 2001, Lieth and Mochtchenko, 2002). It is already being cultivated in pilot schemes in the Netherlands, in Belgium, Portugal, und Pakistan (Güth, 2001, Lieth and Mochtchenko, 2002). It is known that a high sodium concentration induces stomatal closure in A. tripolium due to the inactivation of the K influx channels of the guard cells (Perera et al., 1994, 1995, 1997; Robinson et al., 1997; Véry et al., 1998; Kerstiens et al., 2002), leading to reduced transpiration and lower photosynthesis (Lorenzen et al., 1990; Huiskes, 1996a, b; Ueda et al., 2003). As Aster is a C3 plant, the impaired assimilation rate is likely to cause oxidative stress. There have also been some hints in the literature that A. tripolium may benefit from elevated CO2 (enhanced water relations and/or growth; Lenssen and Rozema, 1990; Rozema et al., 1990; Lenssen et al., 1995), but up to now there has not been any detailed information about the effect of elevated CO2 on the salinity tolerance of this plant.

However, to assess its potential as a cash crop in a future with rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations, detailed scientific information is needed on both its salt tolerance mechanisms and their interaction with elevated CO2 concentration. In this respect, gas exchange, water relations and connected parameters are of special importance because CO2 mainly influences salinity tolerance mechanisms connected to the osmotic effects of salinity rather than to ion specific effects. Therefore this study focused particularly on the interactive effects of NaCl salinity and elevated CO2 on gas exchange and related parameters (such as chlorophyll and carotenoid content) on A. tripolium. NaCl salinity and elevated CO2 concentration also cause anatomical and morphological changes such as dilations of the thylakoid membranes or changes in cell wall composition and/or thickness (Koyro, 2002; Oksanen et al., 2005). In order to find symptoms of disorders and to explain adaptation mechanisms, (ultra)structural changes accompanying physiological alterations in A. tripolium were also examined under salinity and elevated CO2 concentration. Finally, measurements of the superoxide dismutase activity served as an indicator of the plant's response to ROS and therefore of the intensity of oxidative stress.

Materials and methods

Plant material and culture conditions

Stratified seeds of Aster tripolium L. (origin: Weser salt marsh near Cuxhaven, northern Germany) were sown on moist seed soil in an environmentally controlled greenhouse (16/8 h light/dark; day temperature 25±2 °C, night temperature 18±2 °C; 65±5% relative humidity). After 2 months, the plants were transferred to two different open-top chambers (Fangmeier et al., 1992) where they were supplied with ambient atmospheric CO2 concentration (380 ppm) and elevated CO2 concentration (520 ppm, simulating the future concentration in the atmosphere in 40 to 80 years’ time; IPCC, 2007), respectively. In each chamber, the plants were grown in a hydroponics quick check system (modified after Koyro, 2003; see Fig. 1 for more details). They were irrigated with a basic nutrient solution (1 mM KNO3; 1 mM Ca(NO3)2; 1 mM NH4H2PO4; 1 mM (NH4)2HPO4; 1 mM MgSO4; 0.02 mM Fe-EDTA; 0.025 mM H3BO3; 0.05 mM KCl; 0.002 mM MnSO4; 0.002 mM ZnSO4; 0.0005 mM CuSO4; 0.0005 mM MoO3; modified after Epstein, 1972), and the pots were permanently aerated. After 1 week of acclimation time, the salinity of the nutrient solution was raised stepwise by adding 50 mol m−3 NaCl every morning and every evening. There were five salinity levels containing eight to ten plants each (0, 125, 250, 375, and 500 mol m−3 NaCl; equivalent to 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% seawater salinity=sws) which were maintained for 4 weeks. Two independent cultures grown in different years were used for measurements.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Quick check system of Aster tripolium plants. Each pot contains 6.0 l of nutrient solution. Salinity increases from left to right; sws, seawater salinity.

As, in contrast to many other halophytes, A. tripolium shows maximum growth under non-saline conditions (N Geissler, unpublished results), the 0% sws treatment was considered as a control with which the other salinity levels could be compared.

Gas exchange

Gas exchange was measured porometrically with a Li-Cor 6200 portable photosynthesis system (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA) on young, but fully emerged leaves which grew completely under the treatment. Two leaves of at least six plants of each treatment and of each culture were used for measurements. Measurements were carried out at natural relative humidity (40–60%) and temperature (26–31 °C) in the open top chambers. A steady-state light response curve was determined at photosynthetic photon flux density levels of 0 and approximately 50, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 μmol photon m−2 s−1 given by a light source (halogen bulb with reflector, 50 W, with dimmer). The net photosynthetic rate, transpiration, stomatal resistance, and intercellular CO2 concentration were determined under saturating irradiation (1500 μmol photon m−2 s−1; formulas for calculation in Li-Cor Inc., 1990). The light compensation point (Ic), saturation irradiance (Is), and apparent quantum yield of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation (Φc) were calculated with the help of the exponential function explained by Schulte et al. (2003).

Chlorophyll and carotenoid content

Fresh material of adult leaves was extracted in 80% ethanol, and chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids were determined spectrophotometrically after Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983) and Lichtenthaler (1987).

Light microscopy (LM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

Leaf samples for LM and TEM were harvested in the early morning, and sample preparation was modified after Ruzin (1999). Leaf pieces of the controls were fixed for 4 h with 2.5% glutardialdehyde in 0.05 M PIPES buffer (pH 6.8) at room temperature after a vacuum infiltration (1 min at 0.05 MPa and 0.025 MPa respectively, then 5 min at 0.05 MPa). The salt-treated samples were washed for 30 s with aqua bidest before being fixed with 2% glutardialdehyde+1.5% formaldehyde in 0.05 M PIPES buffer. After that, the fixing medium was step by step substituted by 0.05 M PIPES buffer: One-third of the medium was exchanged three times, and after that almost the whole medium was exchanged twice. After a post-fixation with 1% OsO4 in 0.05 M PIPES buffer at room temperature, the samples were carefully rinsed with water, continuously dehydrated with acetone (Sitte, 1962), infiltrated in ERL-4206 resin (Spurr, 1969) overnight and polymerized at 70 °C for 12 h.

The embedded samples were sectioned with glass knives on an ultramicrotome (Ultracut E, Reichert-Jung). Semi-thin sections for LM were stained with 0.5% toluidine blue+0.5% borax, ultrathin sections for TEM were contrasted with 2% uranylacetate and 5% lead citrate (Reynolds, 1963).

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Leaf pieces were fixed for 10 d with FAA (45% ethanol+5% acetic acid+1.85% formaldehyde) at room temperature and were then dehydrated in ethanol (15 min in 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 96%, 100%, and 100% over a molecular sieve each) (modified after Ruzin, 1999). The samples were dried in a Balzers Union Critical Point Dryer, and a thin gold layer was sputtered onto the surface in a Leitz sputtering chamber (2 min, 0.6 mA).

Determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity

For the determination of SOD activity, 0.5 g leaf material (taken from the second youngest fully emerged leaf) were ground in liquid nitrogen in a mortar and homogenized with 2 ml 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1 mM Na2-EDTA*2H2O, 1% (w/v) PVP, and 10 mM ascorbic acid. After centrifugation, the supernatant was dialysed overnight against 700 ml extraction buffer at 4 °C and then used as the enzyme source. SOD activity was measured according to Rios-Gonzalez et al. (2002). 1 ml 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) which contained 0.1 mM Na2-EDTA*2H2O, 13 mM L-methionine, 0.17 mM nitro blue tetrazolium chloride and 7 μM riboflavin was mixed with 10 μl enzyme extract in small glass bowls. The samples were shaken for 25 min under a UV lamp (350 nm), and the extinction was measured at 560 nm.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was carried out by one-way or multi-way (in case several variables directly influenced one another) analysis of variance using SPSS software. Differences between means (P ≤0.05) were assessed by Tukey's post hoc test (differences between more than two salinity levels) and by Student's t test (differences between two salinity levels and between the CO2 treatments).

Results

Gas exchange

Under ambient atmospheric CO2 concentrations, seawater salinity significantly reduced the net assimilation rate at light saturation (Amax) by two-thirds (Fig. 2A; Table 1A), and photosynthesis was saturated at lower light intensities. The intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) decreased in this C3 plant to the conspicuously low value of less than 150 ppm at sea water salinity (Table 1A). Stomatal resistance (Rs) increased significantly so that transpiration (E) was reduced, but this effect was not strong enough to prevent a significant decrease in water use efficiency (WUE) by 30%. The results of the stomatal resistance are in accordance with the structural investigations which showed that the stomata were more closed in the salt treatments (Fig. 2B). Salinity also led to a higher light compensation point (Ic) and to a transient decrease (decrease at medium salinity, increase at high salinity) in photosynthetic efficiency (Φc) (Table 1B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Effect of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis. (A) Light saturation curves at different salinities under ambient CO2 (380) and elevated CO2 (520). Curves were drawn with the help of SigmaPlot Software, based on all 12 measurements at 0, 50, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 μmol photon m−2 s−1, respectively. (B) Stomata in the adaxial epidermis of controls and of plants grown at 75% sws (ambient CO2 concentration; SEM photographs). sws, seawater salinity; A, net photosynthetic rate; PAR, photosynthetic active radiation; gc, guard cells of stomata; arrows indicate cuticular ridges.

Table 1.(a).

Gas exchange parameters at different salinities under ambient and elevated CO2

Salinity treatment CO2 treatment A (μmol m−2 s−1) Rs (s cm−1) E (mol m−2 s−1) WUE (μmol mmol−1) Ci (ppm)
Control ambient 21.6±6.1 a 1.7±0.8 a 4.3±0.9 a 5.1±1.6 a 172.9±31.1 a
50% sws ambient 11.4±6.0 b 4.5±2.2 b 2.8±1.4 b 4.3±0.9 b 144.3±48.5 b
100% sws ambient 7.6±4.6 c 9.7±5.4 c 2.3±1.6 b 3.5±0.4 c 132.0±30.2 b
Control elevated 33.6±6.3 a* 1.2±0.7 a 6.1±1.5 a* 5.8±1.5 a 262.8±33.2 a*
50% sws elevated 20.8±7.9 b* 3.1±2.1 b 4.0±1.9 b 5.4±1.1 a* 231.9±49.6 b*
100% sws elevated 13.0±4.8 c* 6.9±4.9 c* 2.5±1.3 c 5.6±0.3 a* 184.0±52.6 c*

All parameters were measured at light saturation. A, net assimilation rate; Rs, stomatal resistance; E, transpiration; WUE, water use efficiency of photosynthesis; Ci, internal CO2 concentration; sws, seawater salinity. Values represent mean ±SD values of 12 measurements per treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤0.05) between salinity levels (within one CO2 treatment), an asterisk indicates significant difference between CO2 treatments (within one salinity level).

(b).

Gas exchange parameters of the light saturation curves

Salinity treatment CO2 treatment Ic (μmol m−2 s−1) Is (μmol m−2 s−1) Φc (mol CO2 mol−1 photons)
Control ambient 61.1 683.4 0.08
50% sws ambient 55.0 544.9 0.06
100% sws ambient 72.8 219.4 0.10
Control elevated 48.8 1049.9 0.08
50% sws elevated 108.0 730.4 0.07
100% sws elevated 90.4 332.8 0.10

Ic, light compensation point; Is, saturation irradiance; Φc, apparent quantum yield of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation; sws, seawater salinity. SD values and significances were not determined because Ic, Is, and Φc were calculated once for each treatment with the help of an exponential function (Schulte et al., 2003), based on all 12 measurements at 0, 50, 200, 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 μmol photon m−2 s−1, respectively.

Under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations, net photosynthesis was significantly ameliorated and was saturated at higher light intensities, and the plants showed a significantly higher intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci; Fig. 2A; Table 1A). Rs was lower and E was higher in the salt-treated plants than under ambient CO2. WUE could be held constant at all salinity levels due to the increase in photosynthesis. Elevated CO2 concentration also led to a higher Ic of the salt treatments (Table 1B). No distinct differences in Φc were observed between the CO2 treatments.

Chlorophyll and carotenoid content

Under ambient atmospheric CO2 concentrations, rising NaCl salinity caused a continual decrease in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid content which was significant for chlorophyll b (Fig. 3A). The chlorophyll a/b ratio showed a significant increase under saline conditions (Fig. 3C). Elevated CO2 concentration led to a significantly higher content of all three pigments in the high salt treatments (Fig. 3B). The chlorophyll a/b ratio was not influenced by elevated CO2 (Fig. 3D).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Pigment composition of adult leaves at different salinities. (A) Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b) and carotenoid (Car) content under ambient CO2; (B) chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid content under elevated CO2; (C) chlorophyll a/b ratio under ambient CO2; (D) chlorophyll a/b ratio under elevated CO2. Values represent mean ±SD values of nine measurements per treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤0.05) between salinity levels (within one CO2 treatment), an asterisk indicates a significant difference between CO2 treatments (within one salinity level). sws, seawater salinity.

Leaf anatomy

The leaves of the control plants were bifacial flattened leaves with an adaxial palisade parenchyma (one or two cell layers) and an abaxial spongy parenchyma (Fig. 4A). A few leaves exhibited an inflated, thick spongy parenchyma, the adaxial part of which formed a dense tissue with only few intercellular spaces. Under saline conditions, the vertical extension of the cross-sectioned leaves increased up to two times due to changes of the mesophyll (Fig. 4B; Table 2). The palisade parenchyma of many leaves developed an additional cell layer, and an inflated spongy parenchyma of stronger development was present in the majority of the leaves (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, the mesophyll cells were larger under saline conditions; in particular, the vertical length of the palisade parenchyma cells increased (Table 2). The rise in leaf thickness was accompanied by a decline in intercellular spaces in all mesophyll tissues (Fig. 4B, C; Table 2).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Cross-sections of leaves (LM photographs). (A) Control; (B) 75% sws (seawater salinity); (C) 75% sws with strongly developed, inflated spongy parenchyma. ad, adaxial epidermis; pp, palisade parenchyma; sp, spongy parenchyma; dsp, dense adaxial part of spongy parenchyma; ab, abaxial epidermis; vb, vascular bundle.

Table 2.

Anatomical and ultrastructural characteristics of control plants and salt treatments under ambient CO2 concentration

Control 75% sws
Vertical extension of palisade parenchyma (μm) 117.0±12.2 a 329.0±64.4 b
Vertical extension of spongy parenchyma (μm) 247.7±35.1 a 450.1±78.4 b
Vertical extension of whole leaf (μm) 410.1±49.7 a 837.6±66.9 b
Vertical extension of single palisade parenchyma cells (μm) 59.4±13.7 a 112.0±26.2 b
Vertical extension of single spongy parenchyma cells, in dense adaxial part (μm) 45.2±11.7 a 75.2±15.7 b
Vertical extension of single spongy parenchyma cells, in abaxial part (μm) 47.9±11.4 a 80.0±24.9 b
Intercellular spaces in palisade parenchyma (% per area) 41.1±4.9 a 16.6±5.5 b
Intercellular spaces in spongy parenchyma, in dense adaxial part (% per area) 19.5±6.3 a 8.6±4.2 a
Intercellular spaces in spongy parenchyma, in abaxial part (% per area) 47.0±10.1 a 31.3±10.3 a
Number of vesicles (1000 μm−2) 3.0±1.4 a 7.7±1.0 b

sws, seawater salinity. Values represent mean ±SD values of three leaves per treatment (in case of single cells of 10 cells each). Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤0.05) between salinity levels.

Elevated CO2 concentration had only minor effects on leaf anatomy which are therefore not discussed in this paper.

Ultrastructure of the outer epidermal cell walls of the leaves, palisade parenchyma cells, and vascular bundles

Both saline conditions and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration led to an increase in the thickness of the outer epidermal cell walls of the leaves; under elevated CO2 the walls of the salt-treated plants were twice as thick as the ones of the controls grown at 380 ppm CO2 (Fig. 5). Furthermore, cuticle thickness increased under salinity plus elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. It more than doubled in the salt treatments under elevated CO2 concentration compared with the controls under ambient CO2. Salinity also altered the surface structure of the epidermis (Fig. 2B). While the cells of the controls were irregularly shaped and had narrow cuticular ridges, the salt-treated cells showed fewer bulges and had a larger amount of cuticular ridges which were wider and flatter. The surface structure of the epidermis was not altered by elevated CO2 concentration.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Outer cell wall of the adaxial epidermis with cuticle (TEM photographs). (A) Control, ambient CO2; (B) 75% sws (seawater salinity), ambient CO2; (C) control, elevated CO2; (D) 75% sws, elevated CO2. cw, cell wall; cut, cuticle. Values represent mean ±SD values of three leaves per treatment. An asterisk indicates a significant difference (P ≤0.05) between salinity treatments under ambient CO2, two asterisks indicate a significant difference both between salinity treatments under elevated CO2 and between the CO2 treatments.

Regarding the palisade parenchyma, NaCl salinity affected chloroplast ultrastructure. The chloroplasts of the control plants (at 380 ppm CO2) were more or less oval-shaped and contained only a few small starch grains (Fig. 6A). Their thylakoid membranes were clearly differentiated into stacks of grana and stroma thylakoids (Fig. 7A, B). Under saline conditions, the chloroplasts were partially horseshoe-shaped, and they contained a larger number of starch grains (Fig. 6B). Their thylakoid membranes showed dilations, the spaces between the membranes looked swollen, and undulated thylakoid areas developed (Fig. 7C, D). In particular, the number of grana stacks was considerably reduced. Under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations, the control chloroplasts contained numerous large starch grains (Fig. 6C). In the salt treatments, less starch was observed than in the controls (Fig. 6D). Due to excessive starch accumulation, some of the chloroplasts developed a round shape or lateral protuberances. General chloroplast ultrastructure was not affected by elevated CO2, but a larger number of nearly intact chloroplasts with only minor dilations of the thylakoids were found under saline conditions (Fig. 7E).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Palisade parenchyma cells (TEM photographs). (A) Control, ambient CO2; (B) 75% sws (seawater salinity), ambient CO2; (C) control, elevated CO2; (D) 75% sws, elevated CO2; (E) vesicles in a cell grown at 75% sws under ambient CO2. ch, chloroplast; v, vacuole; cw, cell wall; cp, cytoplasm; vs, vesicle.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Chloroplasts and vascular bundle (TEM photographs). (A–D) Chloroplasts. (A, B) Control, ambient CO2; (C, D) 75% sws (seawater salinity), ambient CO2; (E) 75% sws, elevated CO2; (F) transfer cells in phloem parenchyma. st, stroma thylakoids; gt, grana thylakoids; s, starch grain; d, dilations; pg, plastoglobulus; tc, transfer cell.

NaCl salinity also affected the number of vesicles in the mesophyll cells. The salt treatments exhibited a larger number of vesicles than the controls (Table 2). In some areas of their cytoplasm, vesicles were observed, some of which were fused with the plasma membrane (Fig. 6E) instead of chloroplasts.

The ultrastructure of the vascular bundles was not appreciably affected by salinity and elevated CO2. For the sake of completeness it should be mentioned that in all treatments numerous transfer cells with protuberances of the cell walls, plastids and a large number of mitochondria were present in the phloem (Fig. 7F).

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity

Salinity led to a tendential increase in relative SOD activity (Table 3). Under elevated CO2 concentrations, the activity of the salt treatments was significantly higher (factor 1.6) compared to ambient CO2, and it was twice as high (a significant effect) as the one of the controls at elevated CO2.

Table 3.

Superoxide dismutase activity of control plants and of plants grown at 75% sws (seawater salinity) under ambient and elevated CO2

Salinity treatment Ambient CO2 Elevated CO2
Control 9.4±1.8 a 8.5±0.6 a
75% sws 11.5±2.0 a 18.0±4.6 b*

Values represent mean ±SD values of six measurements per treatment. Different letters indicate significant differences (P ≤0.05) between salinity levels (within one CO2 treatment), an asterisk indicates a significant difference between the CO2 treatments (within one salinity level).

Discussion

Regarding the four major constraints of NaCl salinity on plant growth (see Introduction), the osmotic effect is the primary one affecting the plant (Munns, 2002). As expected (see above) A. tripolium reacts to this constraint by closing its stomata in order to reduce transpiration and thus dehydration. Several xeromorphic changes of the leaves which were also observed in other plant species (Hajibagheri et al., 1983, in Koyro, 2002; Koyro, 2000a, b, 2006; Daoud et al., 2003; Debez et al., 2003) perform the same function, namely (i) the thickened outer epidermal cell walls, the thickened cuticle, and the wider and flatter cuticular ridges on a larger number of cells; (ii) the thicker leaves due to an increase in vertical extension of the mesophyll cells and a larger amount of mesophyll cell layers; and (iii) the decrease in intercellular spaces.

The last two factors led to a higher mesophyll resistance for CO2 which, in turn, together with the rising stomatal resistance, caused a reduction of the intercellular CO2 concentration. This reinforces, especially in C3 plants like Aster, the oxygenase reaction of Rubisco, thus leading to higher photorespiration at the expense of photosynthesis (Sobrado, 2005; Debez et al., 2006). The impaired assimilation rate also correlates with the ultrastructural changes of the chloroplasts (see below). As there was a higher reduction in net photosynthesis than in transpiration, water use efficiency of photosynthesis (WUE) declined significantly. Obviously, the reduction in transpiration is not sufficient to maintain a positive water balance at higher salinities. These results contrast with the studies of Lorenzen et al. (1990) and Huiskes (1996b) who report a rising WUE in salt-treated Aster plants. However, those results were obtained under very low light intensities (100 μmol m−2 s−1) so that they are comparable with our study only to a limited extent. Our own measurements of greenhouse cultures under low light intensities (data not shown) showed similarities with the study of Huiskes (1996b): they showed a more prominent decrease in transpiration, in relation to the decrease in photosynthesis, and thus a transient increase in WUE with rising salinity. This consideration indicates that high light intensities have a negative impact on the gas exchange of A. tripolium and it simultaneously confirms the thesis that salinity enhances photorespiration and thus oxidative stress.

Another important point is that a reduced assimilation rate often leads to oxidative stress due to an energy surplus of the photosystems. (Schulze et al., 2002; Ben Amor et al., 2005). Two concrete indications of a higher exposure of A. tripolium cells to ROS under saline conditions were observed.

Firstly, the superoxide dismutase showed a higher activity in the salt treatments, similar to several other studies on plant responses to various abiotic stresses (Mittova et al., 2002; Ben Amor et al., 2005; Kukreja et al., 2005; Stepien and Klobus, 2005). This crucial antioxidant enzyme (Halliwell, 1987; Asada, 1992; Ben Amor et al., 2005) is present not only in the cytosol, but also in the stroma of the chloroplasts (http://www.plantstress.com/Articles/Oxidative%Stress. htm.), i.e. at the site of photosynthesis and ROS formation. Therefore, a higher enzyme activity is a good indicator of an increase in oxidative stress.

Secondly, dilations of the thylakoid membranes were observed. This kind of damage has often been observed in salt-stressed plants (Kurkova et al., 2002; Rahman et al., 2002; Mitsuya et al., 2003a; Fidalgo et al., 2004; Paramanova et al., 2004), has been discussed by many authors as a consequence of oxidative stress (Mitsuya et al., 2003a, b; Fidalgo et al., 2004; Yamane et al., 2004; Oksanen et al., 2005) and indicates that the increase in SOD activity is not high enough to eliminate ROS sufficiently in A. tripolium. Oxidative stress can also be reduced by mechanisms which counteract the energy surplus of the photosystems. One of these mechanisms is the higher photorespiration under saline conditions which can diminish the Mehler reaction. (Wingler et al., 2000). The reduction of oxidative stress seems to be crucial for the survival of A. tripolium under saline conditions. This is indicated by several reactions of Aster to salinity which ameliorate oxidative stress while counteracting the energy surplus of the photosystems. The thicker outer epidermal cell walls, the thicker cuticle, and the wider cuticular ridges can avoid an overreduction of the photosynthetic electron transport chain because they reflect a higher proportion of the incoming radiation (Thomas, 2005). The reduced chlorophyll content of the leaves can fulfil a similar function (less energy conduction by the light-harvesting complex, see below). On the one hand, it reduces the assimilation rate of A. tripolium (Lorenzen et al., 1990), but on the other hand (and in case of A. tripolium more important), it decreases the light absorption of the leaves (Wang et al., 2003; Christian, 2005). This thesis is supported by the fact that, at medium salinity, the reduced photosynthetic efficiency (Φ) was linked to a lower light compensation point. At high salinity, Φ rose again, probably due to an increasing dark respiration (data not shown). Photosynthetic efficiency could also be reduced by the higher chlorophyll a/b ratio in the leaves (Moorthy and Kathiresan, 1999; in Koyro, 2006) because chlorophyll b is mainly located in the light harvesting complex (LHC). As a direct consequence, the disproportionate reduction of chlorophyll b compared to chlorophyll a seems to be accompanied by a reduction of grana stacks, the location of the LHC, in the salt-treated plants.

Apart from structural alterations related to photosynthesis and gas exchange (see above), structural characteristics of A. tripolium related to other adaptation mechanisms were also found, such as a larger number of starch grains being present in the salt-treated chloroplasts compared to the controls. As the samples were harvested in the morning, this is probably not related to photosynthetic activity, but to hampered translocation and/or sink activities. According to Keiper et al. (1998) salinity can inhibit starch-degrading enzymes or induce the conversion of saccharides into starch (Parida et al., 2004). Possibly, salt-treated A. tripolium plants accumulate a starch reservoir which can be released and metabolized under better growth conditions and decreasing stress.

Indications of adaptation to ion toxicity and nutrient imbalance (enhanced selective ion transport) had already been shown for A. tripolium (N Geissler, unpublished results). Mechanisms such as ion compartmentation into the vacuoles prevent an excessive NaCl accumulation in the stroma of the chloroplasts and are therefore of importance to the maintenance of photosynthesis. The larger mesophyll cells of the salt treatments exhibit larger vacuoles and therefore have a higher capacity to sequester NaCl into these compartments (Ayala et al., 1996). Furthermore, as in other plant species, the mesophyll cells and the sieve tubes of the phloem contained a larger number of vesicles which increase the membrane surface area and are often discussed in connection with processes such as transport, storage, and NaCl compartmentation (Koyro, 1997, 2002; Kurkova et al., 2002; Mitsuya et al., 2002). Transfer cells which were found in the phloem parenchyma fulfil a similar function (Koyro, 2002; Boughanmi et al., 2003; Offler et al., 2003).

Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration seemed to ameliorate some of the negative effects of NaCl salinity on A. tripolium. Elevated CO2 caused an increase in intercellular CO2 concentration and a significantly higher net assimilation rate, leading to an improved WUE of the salt treatments. From these results, it can be inferred that the plants had a better supply of energy-rich organic substances while their water relations were improved (N Geissler, unpublished results).

Responses of gas exchange and growth to elevated CO2 concentration are variable; they depend on plant species and abiotic factors such as salinity and humidity (Drake, 1992; Ball and Munns, 1992; Arp et al., 1993). In the case of A. tripolium, the observed decrease in stomatal resistance shows that the priority for this plant (at least under our experimental conditions) does not seem to be the reduction of water loss but the maximization of photosynthesis and energy gain (see below). The significantly higher chlorophyll content also contributes to this strategy. These results also show that Aster, at least for the duration of this study, does not acclimate to elevated CO2 like many other plants (Urban, 2003; Long et al., 2004). Acclimation depends on the source–sink ratio within the plant and will often be alleviated if carbon sinks are enlarged under elevated CO2 concentration (Engloner et al., 2003; Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007); since the salt-treated Aster plants invest in energy-dependent salinity tolerance mechanisms (see below) and thus enlarge their C sinks, it is not surprising that they do not show any acclimation.

Maximizing CO2 uptake and photosynthesis under elevated CO2 concentration is a reasonable strategy because the impaired net assimilation rate and the accompanying oxidative stress limit the survival of A. tripolium on saline habitats, and the facilitated CO2 uptake reduces photorespiration and an overreduction of the photosystems, reducing oxidative stress (Baczek-Kwinta and Kościelniak, 2003; Oksanen et al., 2005; Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007). Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration therefore ameliorates metabolic processes in A. tripolium which are typically associated with C3 metabolism and are disadvantageous on saline habitats compared to C4 plants (which show hardly any photorespiration even at ambient CO2 concentration; Ainsworth and Rogers, 2007). This fact can enhance the survival of Aster on saline habitats under elevated CO2.

The plants seemed to use the additional energy supply under elevated CO2 concentration for increasing the investment in salinity tolerance mechanisms, for example, for reducing oxidative stress and water loss. The SOD activity of the salt treatments was significantly enhanced under elevated CO2, so that ROS could be scavenged more effectively. Similar results were obtained for other species by Marabottini et al. (2001), Schwanz and Polle (2001), and Rao et al. (1995). In accordance with other studies (Tipping and Murray, 1999; Tingey et al., 2003; Oksanen et al., 2005), the outer epidermal cell walls and the cuticle could also be thickened because a larger number of carbon skeletons is available. Due to the thicker cell walls and cuticle, transpiration was decreased. Furthermore, a higher proportion of the incoming radiation could be reflected so that, on the one hand, an increase in internal leaf temperature (due to lower transpiration) could be prevented and, on the other hand, oxidative stress could be diminished because the amount of usable light was reduced. According to Thomas (2005), an increase in leaf reflection is a phenomenon often observed under elevated CO2 concentration. The amount of usable light could also be reduced by the higher content of carotenoids which contribute to non-photochemical quenching (Lu et al., 2003; Buchannan et al., 2005; Christian, 2005).

A larger number of chloroplasts with only minor dilations of the thylakoid membranes in the salt treatments are a concrete indication of less oxidative stress under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Oksanen et al. (2001) noticed similar reactions in ozone-stressed Populus tremuloides and Betula papyrifera. This fact is of major importance because the chloroplasts, as the site of photosynthesis, fulfil a key function in the adaptation to salinity, and chloroplast integrity correlates with the higher assimilation rate of A. tripolium. Another difference in the chloroplasts of the plants grown under elevated CO2 compared with those under ambient CO2 was that the number of starch grains declined along with rising salinity. This indicates that the salt-treated plants do not accumulate a starch storage under elevated CO2 (see above), but they metabolize a larger amount of starch because of better conditions of growth.

In summary, it can be concluded from our results that elevated CO2 concentration enhances the energy and water supply of Aster tripolium, ameliorates oxidative stress, and thus enhances the survival of this plant in saline habitats. Therefore, Aster seems to be a promising cash crop halophyte for a future with rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Its sustainable use can help in desalinizing and reclaiming degraded land and sequestering CO2, thus counteracting the greenhouse effect. However, more research about the reaction of A. tripolium to other facors accompanying climate change (such as elevated temperature) and their interaction with salinity tolerance would be desirable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Mr Jürgen Franz, Mr Wolfgang Stein, Mrs Angelika Bölke, and Mr Gerhard Mayer for technical assistance and to Dr Martin Hardt and Mrs Sabine Agel (Zentrale Biotechnische Betriebseinheit) for their supervision and advice concerning the TEM and SEM examinations.

Glossary

Abbreviations

ppm

parts per million

sws

seawater salinity

IPCC

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SOD

superoxide dismutase

PIPES

piperazine-1,4-bis(2-ethanesulphonic acid)

ERL

epoxy resin of low viscosity

LM

light microscopy/microscope

TEM

transmission electron microscopy/microscope

SEM

scanning electron microscopy/microscope

PVP

polyvinylpyrrolidone

EDTA

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

Amax

photosynthetic rate at light saturation

E

transpiration

Rs

stomatal resistance

WUE

water use efficiency of photosynthesis

Ci

intercellular CO2 concentration

Ic

light compensation point

Is

saturation irradiance

Φc

apparent quantum yield of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation

SD

standard deviation

References

  1. Ainsworth EA, Rogers A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2007;30:258–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arp WJ, Drake BG, Pockman WT, Curtis PS, Whigham DF. Interaction between C3 and C4 salt marsh species during four years of exposure to elevated atmospheric CO2. Vegetatio. 1993;104/105:133–143. [Google Scholar]
  3. Asada K. Ascorbate peroxidase: hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzyme in plants. Physiologia Plantarum. 1992;85:235–241. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayala F, O'Leary J, Schumaker KS. Increased vacuolar and plasma membrane H+-ATPase activities in Salicornia bigelovii Torr. in response to NaCl. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1996;46:25–32. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.371.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baczek-Kwinta R, Kościelniak J. Anti-oxidative effect of elevated CO2 concentration in the air on maize hybrids subjected to severe chill. Photosynthetica. 2003;41:161–165. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ball MC, Munns R. Plant responses to salinity under elevated atmospheric concentrations of CO2. Australian Journal of Botany. 1992;40:515–525. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ben Amor N, Ben Hamed K, Debez A, Grignon C, Abdelly C. Physiological and antioxidant responses of the perennial halophyte Crithmum maritimum to salinity. Plant Science. 2005;168:889–899. [Google Scholar]
  8. Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt KV. Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Annals of Botany. 2003;91:179–194. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boughanmi N, Michonneau P, Verdus M-C, Piton F, Ferjani E, Bizid E, Fleurat-Lessard P. Structural changes induced by NaCl in companion and transfer cells of Medicago sativa blades. Protoplasma. 2003;220:179–187. doi: 10.1007/s00709-002-0043-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Buchannan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. 5th edn. Rockville, USA: American Society of Plant Physiologists; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  11. Choukr-Allah R, Harrouni MC. Symposium on the conservation of mangal ecosystems. Al Ain: United Arab Emirates; 1996. The potential use of halophytes under saline irrigation in Morocco (abstract) pp. 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  12. Christian R. Interactive effects of salinity and irradiance on photoprotection in acclimated seedlings of two sympatric mangroves. Trees. 2005;19:596–606. [Google Scholar]
  13. Daoud S, Koyro H-W, Harrouni MC. Salinity tolerance of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Part I. Biomass production and osmotic adjustment. In: Lieth H, Mochtchenko M, editors. Cash crop halophytes: recent studies. Tasks for vegetation science 38. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. pp. 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  14. Debez A, Ben Hamed K, Abdelly C. Some physiological and biochemical aspects of salt tolerance in two oleaginous halophytes: Cakile maritima and Crithmum maritimum. In: Lieth H, Mochtchenko M, editors. Cash crop halophytes: recent studies. Tasks for vegetation science 38. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. pp. 31–39. [Google Scholar]
  15. Debez A, Saadaoui D, Ramani B, Ouerghi Z, Koyro H-W, Huchzermeyer B, Abdelly C. Leaf H+-ATPase activity and photosynthetic capacity of Cakile maritima under increasing salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2006;57:285–295. [Google Scholar]
  16. Drake BG. A field study of the effects of elevated CO2 on ecosystem processes in a Chesapeake Bay wetland. Australian Journal of Botany. 1992;40:579–595. [Google Scholar]
  17. Engloner AI, Kovacs D, Balogh J, Tuba Z. Anatomical and eco-physiological changes in leaves of couch-grass (Elymus repens L.), a temperate loess grassland species, after 7 years growth under elevated CO2 concentration. Photosynthetica. 2003;41:185–189. [Google Scholar]
  18. Epstein E. Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives. New York, USA: Wiley; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fangmeier A, Stein W, Jäger H-J. Advantages of an open-top chamber plant exposure system to assess the impact of atmospheric trace gases on vegetation. Angewandte Botanik. 1992;66:97–105. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fidalgo F, Santos A, Santos I, Salema R. Effects of long-term salt stress on antioxidant defence systems, leaf water relations and chloroplast ultrastructure of potato plants. Annals of Applied Biology. 2004;145:185–192. [Google Scholar]
  21. Greenway H, Munns R. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in non-halophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 1980;31:149–190. [Google Scholar]
  22. Güth M. Halophyte uses in different climates. III. Computer-aided analysis of socio-economic aspects of the sustainable utilisation of halophytes. Progress in Biometeorology 15. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  23. Halliwell B. Oxidative damage, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant protection in chloroplasts. Chemistry and Physics of Lipids. 1987;44:327–340. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hu YC, Schmidhalter U. Drought and salinity: a comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2005;168:541–549. [Google Scholar]
  25. Huchzermeyer B, Koyro H-W. Salt and drought stress effects on photosynthesis. In: Pessarakli M, editor. Handbook of photosynthesis. 2nd edn. Florida, USA: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Publishing Company; 2005. pp. 751–777. [Google Scholar]
  26. Huiskes AHL. Saline crops. A contribution to the diversification of the production of vegetable crops by research on the cultivation methods and selection of halophytes. 1996a. EC-AIR-project, Annual report 1996. [Google Scholar]
  27. Huiskes AHL. Saline crops. A contribution to the diversification of the production of vegetable crops by research on the cultivation methods and selection of halophytes. 1996b. EC-AIR-project, Periodic report 1/1/1996–30/6/1996. [Google Scholar]
  28. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Miller HL, Chen Z, editors. IPCC. Climate change 2007. The physical science basis. 2007. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK, and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  29. Keiper FJ, Chen DM, De Filippis LF. Respiratory, photosynthetic and ultrastructural changes accompanying salt adaptation in culture of Eucalyptus microcorys. Journal of Plant Physiology. 1998;152:564–573. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kerstiens G, Tych W, Robinson MF, Mansfield TA. Sodium-related partial stomatal closure and salt tolerance of Aster tripolium. New Phytologist. 2002;153:509–515. doi: 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00330.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kirschbaum MUF. Direct and indirect climate change effects on photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant Biology. 2004;6:242–253. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Koyro H-W. Ultrastructural and physiological changes in root cells of Sorghum plants (Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanensis cv. Sweet Sioux) induced by NaCl. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1997;48:693–706. [Google Scholar]
  33. Koyro H-W. 2000a. Untersuchungen zur Anpassung der Wildrübe (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) an Trockenstress oder NaCl-Salinität. Habilitation thesis, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  34. Koyro H-W. Effect of high NaCl-salinity on plant growth, leaf morphology, and ion composition in leaf tissues of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Journal of Applied Botany. 2000b;74:67–73. [Google Scholar]
  35. Koyro H-W. Ultrastructural effects of salinity in higher plants. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge U, editors. Salinity: environment—plants—molecules. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. pp. 139–157. [Google Scholar]
  36. Koyro H-W. Study of potential cash crop halophytes by a quick check system: determination of the threshold of salinity tolerance and the ecophysiological demands. In: Lieth H, Mochtchenko M, editors. Cash crop halophytes: recent studies. Tasks for vegetation science 38. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. pp. 5–17. [Google Scholar]
  37. Koyro H-W. Effect of salinity on growth, photosynthesis, water relations and solute composition of the potential cash crop halophyte Plantago coronopus (L.) Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2006;56:136–146. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kukreja S, Nandwal AS, Kumar N, Sharma SK, Unvi V, Sharma PK. Plant water status, H2O2 scavenging enzymes, ethylene evolution and membrane integrity of Cicer arietinum roots as affected by salinity. Biologia Plantarum. 2005;49:305–308. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kurkova EB, Kalinkina LG, Baburina OK, Myasoedov NA, Naumova TG. Responses of Seidlitzia rosmarinus to salt stress. Biological Bulletin. 2002;29:221–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lenssen GM, Rozema J. The effects of atmospheric CO2-enrichment and salinity on growth, photosynthesis and water relations of some salt marsh species. In: Goudriaan J, van Keulen H, van Laar HH, editors. The greenhouse effect and primary productivity in European agro-ecosystems. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Pudoc; 1990. pp. 64–67. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lenssen GM, van Duin WE, Jak P, Rozema J. The response of Aster tripolium and Puccinellia maritima to atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment and their interactions with flooding and salinity. Aquatic Botany. 1995;50:181–192. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic membranes. Methods in Enzymology. 1987;148:350–382. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR. Determination of the total carotinoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemistry Society Transactions. 1983;603:591–592. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li-Cor Inc. LI-6200 technical reference. Lincoln, NE, USA: 1990. Li-Cor Inc. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lieth H, Moschenko M, Lohmann M, Koyro H-W, Hamdy A. Progress in Biometeorology 13. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers; 1999. Halophyte uses in different climates. I. Ecological and ecophysiological studies. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lieth H, Mochtchenko M. Progress in Biometeorology 18. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers; 2002. Halophyte uses in different climates. IV. Cashcrop halophytes for future halpohyte growers. [Google Scholar]
  47. Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Ort DR. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide: plants FACE the future. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2004;55:591–628. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lorenzen B, Skovhus K, Jensen A. Spectral properties and net photosynthesis of Aster tripolium L. and Halimione portulacoides (L.) Aellen leaves under saline and hypoxic conditions. New Phytologist. 1990;116:255–262. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lovelock CE, Ball MC. Influence of salinity on photosynthesis of halophytes. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge U, editors. Salinity: environment–plants–molecules. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. pp. 315–339. [Google Scholar]
  50. Lu C, Jiang G, Wang B, Kuang T. Photosystem II photochemistry and photosynthetic pigment composition in salt-adapted halophyte Artemisia anethifolia grown under outdoor conditions. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2003;160:403–408. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-00839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Marabottini R, Schraml C, Paolacci AR, Sorgona A, Raschi A, Rennenberg H, Badiani M. Foliar antioxidant status of adult Mediterranean oak species (Quercus ilex L. and Q. pubescens Willd.) exposed to permanent CO2-enrichment and to seasonal water stress. Environmental Pollution. 2001;113:413–423. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00231-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mitsuya S, Yano K, Kawasaki M, Taniguchi M, Miyake H. Relationship between the distribution of Na and the damages caused by salinity in the leaves of rice seedlings grown under a saline condition. Plant Production Science. 2002;5:269–274. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mitsuya S, Kawasaki M, Taniguchi M, Miyake H. Relationship between salinity-induced damages and aging in rice leaf tissues. Plant Production Science. 2003a;6:213–218. [Google Scholar]
  54. Mitsuya S, Kawasaki M, Taniguchi M, Miyake H. Light dependency of salinity-induced chloroplast degradation. Plant Production Science. 2003b;6:219–223. [Google Scholar]
  55. Mittova V, Guy M, Tal M, Volokita M. Response of the cultivated tomato and its wild salt-tolerant relative Lycopersicon pennellii to salt-dependent oxidative stress: increased activities of antioxidant enzymes in root plastids. Free Radical Research. 2002;36:195–202. doi: 10.1080/10715760290006402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2002;25:239–250. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Offler CE, McCurdy DW, Patrick JW, Talbot MJ. Transfer cells: cells specialized for a special purpose. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2003;54:431–454. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Oksanen E, Sober S, Karnosky DF. Impacts of elevated CO2 and/or O3 on leaf ultrastructure of aspen (Populus tremuloides) and birch (Betula papyrifera) in the Aspen FACE experiment. Environmental Pollution. 2001;115:437–446. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00233-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Oksanen E, Riikonen J, Kaakinen S, Holopainen T, Vapaavuori E. Structural characteristics and chemical composition of birch (Betula pendula) leaves are modified by increasing CO2 and ozone. Global Change Biology. 2005;11:732–748. [Google Scholar]
  60. Paramonova NV, Shevyakova NI, Kuznetsov VlV. Ultrastructure of chloroplasts and their storage inclusions in the primary leaves of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum affected by putrescine and NaCl. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2004;51:86–96. [Google Scholar]
  61. Parida AK, Das AB, Sanada Y, Mohanty P. Effects of salinity on biochemical components of the mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum. Aquatic Botany. 2004;80:77–87. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pasternak D. Fodder production with saline water. Project report BGUN-ARI-35–90. Beer-Sheva, Israel: The Institute for Applied Research, Ben Gurion University of the Negev; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  63. Perera LKRR, Mansfield TA, Malloch AJC. Stomatal responses to sodium ions in Aster tripolium: a new hypothesis to explain salinity regulation in above-ground tissues. Plant, Cell and Environment. 1994;7:335–340. [Google Scholar]
  64. Perera LKRR, Robinson MF, Mansfield TA. Responses of the stomata of Aster tripolium to calcium and sodium ions in relation to salinity tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1995;46:623–629. [Google Scholar]
  65. Perera LKRR, De Silva DLR, Mansfield TA. Avoidance of sodium accumulation by the stomatal guard cells of the halophyte Aster tripolium. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1997;48:707–711. [Google Scholar]
  66. Rahman MS, Miyake H, Takeoka Y. Effects of exogenous glycinebetaine on growth and ultrastructure of salt-stressed rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) Plant Production Science. 2002;5:33–44. [Google Scholar]
  67. Rao MV, Hale BA, Ormrod DP. Amelioration of ozone-induced oxidative damage in wheat plants grown under high carbon dioxide. Plant Physiology. 1995;109:421–432. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.2.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Reynolds ES. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. Journal of Cell Biology. 1963;17:208. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rios-Gonzalez K, Erdei L, Lips H. The activity of antioxidant enzymes in maize and sunflower seedlings as affected by salinity and different nitrogen sources. Plant Science. 2002;162:923–930. [Google Scholar]
  70. Robinson MF, Véry A-A, Sanders D, Mansfield TA. How can stomata contribute to salt tolerance? Annals of Botany. 1997;80:387–393. [Google Scholar]
  71. Rogers A, Allen DJ, Davey PA, et al. Leaf photosynthesis and carbohydrate dynamics of soybeans grown throughout their life-cycle under Free-Air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2004;27:449–458. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rozema J, Lenssen GM, Broekman RA, Arp WP. Effects of atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment on salt-marsh plants. In: Beukema JJ, Wolff WJ, Brouns JJWM, editors. Expected effects of climatic change on marine coastal ecosystems. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990. pp. 49–54. [Google Scholar]
  73. Ruzin SE. Plant microtechnique and microscopy. New York, USA and Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  74. Schulte M, Offer C, Hansen U. Induction of CO2-gas exchange and electron transport: comparison of dynamic and steady-state responses in Fagus sylvatica leaves. Trees. 2003;17:153–163. [Google Scholar]
  75. Schulze E-D, Beck E, Müller-Hohenstein K. Pflanzenökologie. Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  76. Schwanz P, Polle A. Differential stress responses of antioxidative systems to drought in pendunculate oak (Quercus robur) and maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) grown under high CO2 concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2001;52:133–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sitte P. Einfaches Verfahren zur stufenlosen Gewebeentwässerung für die elektronenmikroskopische Präparation. Naturwissenschaften. 1962;49:402–403. [Google Scholar]
  78. Sobrado MA. Leaf characteristics and gas exchange of the mangrove Laguncularia racemosa as affected by salinity. Photosynthetica. 2005;43:217–221. [Google Scholar]
  79. Spurr AR. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. Journal of Ultrastructure Research. 1969;26:31–43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(69)90033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Stepien P, Klobus G. Antioxidant defense in the leaves of C3 and C4 plants under salinity stress. Physiologia Plantarum. 2005;125:31–40. [Google Scholar]
  81. Szabolcs I. Soils and salinization. In: Pessarakli M, editor. Handbook of plant and crop stress. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1994. pp. 3–11. [Google Scholar]
  82. Tanji KK. Salinity in the soil environment. In: Läuchli A, Lüttge U, editors. Salinity: environment–plants–molecules. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. pp. 21–51. [Google Scholar]
  83. Thomas SC. Increased leaf reflectance in tropical trees under elevated CO2. Global Change Biology. 2005;11:197–202. [Google Scholar]
  84. Tingey DT, McKane RB, Olszyk DM, Johnson MG, Rygiewicz PT, Lee H. Elevated CO2 and temperature alter nitrogen allocation in Douglas-fir. Global Change Biology. 2003;9:1038–1050. [Google Scholar]
  85. Tipping C, Murray DR. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on leaf anatomy and morphology in Panicum species representing different photosynthetic modes. International Journal of Plant Sciences. 1999;160:1063–1073. doi: 10.1086/314201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Ueda A, Kanechi M, Uno Y, Inagaki N. Photosynthetic limitations of a halophyte sea aster (Aster tripolium L.) under water stress and NaCl stress. Journal of Plant Research. 2003;116:65–70. doi: 10.1007/s10265-002-0070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Urban O. Physiological impacts of elevated CO2 concentration ranging from molecular to whole plant responses. Photosynthetica. 2003;41:9–20. [Google Scholar]
  88. van Ittersum MK, Howden SM, Asseng S. Sensitivity of productivity and deep drainage of wheat cropping systems in a Mediterranean environment to changes in CO2, temperature and precipitation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2003;97:255–273. [Google Scholar]
  89. Véry A-A, Robinson MF, Mansfield TA, Sanders D. Guard cell cation channels are involved in Na+-induced stomatal closure in a halophyte. The Plant Journal. 1998;14:509–521. [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang K-Y, Kellomäki S, Zha T. Modifications in photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll fluorescence in 20-year-old pine trees after a four-year exposure to carbon dioxide and temperature elevation. Photosynthetica. 2003;41:167–175. [Google Scholar]
  91. Wingler A, Lea PJ, Quick WP, Leegood RC. Photorespiration: metabolic pathways and their role in stress protection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 2000;1402:1517–1529. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wullschleger SD, Tschaplinski TJ, Norby RJ. Plant water relations at elevated CO2: implications for water-limited environments. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2002;25:319–331. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00796.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Yamane K, Mitsuya S, Kawasaki M, Taniguchi M, Miyake H. Salinity-induced chloroplast damages in rice leaves (Oryza sativa L.) are reduced by pretreatment with methyl viologen. Crop Science. 2004 cropscience.org.au/icsc2004/poster/3/6/2/684. [Google Scholar]
  94. Yeo A. Predicting the interaction between the effects of salinity and climate change on crop plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 1999;78:159–174. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES