Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1995 Sep 11;23(17):3531–3538. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.17.3531

A small modified hammerhead ribozyme and its conformational characteristics determined by mutagenesis and lattice calculation.

B Lustig 1, N H Lin 1, S M Smith 1, R L Jernigan 1, K T Jeang 1
PMCID: PMC307234  PMID: 7567466

Abstract

A prototypic hammerhead ribozyme has three helices that surround an asymmetrical central core loop. We have mutagenized a hammerhead type ribozyme. In agreement with previous studies, progressive removal of stem-loop II from a three stemmed ribozyme showed that this region is not absolutely critical for catalysis. However, complete elimination of stem II and its loop did reduce, but did not eliminate, function. In a stem-loop II-deleted ribozyme, activity was best preserved when a purine, preferably a G, was present at position 10.1. This G contributed to catalysis irregardless of its role as either one part of a canonical pair with a C residue at 11.1 or a lone nucleotide with C (11.1) deleted. Computational methods using lattices generated 87 million three-dimensional chain forms for a stem-loop II-deleted RNA complex that preserved one potential G.C base pair at positions 10.1 and 11.1. This exhaustive set of chain forms included one major class of structures with G(10.1) being spatially proximal to the GUCX cleavage site of the substrate strand. Strong correlations were observed between colinear arrangement of stems I and III, constraints of base-pairing in the central core loop, and one particular placement of G(10.1) relative to the cleavage site. Our calculations of a stem-loop II-deleted ribozyme indicate that without needing to invoke any other constraints, the inherent asymmetry in the lengths of the two loop strands (3 nt in one and 7 nt in the other) that compose the core and flank G10.1-C11.1 stipulated strongly this particular G placement. This suggests that the hammerhead ribozyme maintains an asymmetry in its internal loop for a necessary structure/function reason.

Full text

PDF
3531

Images in this article

3533Image
on p.3533
3534Image
on p.3534
3536Image
on p.3536

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bratty J., Chartrand P., Ferbeyre G., Cedergren R. The hammerhead RNA domain, a model ribozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1993 Dec 14;1216(3):345–359. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(93)90001-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cech T. R. Self-splicing of group I introns. Annu Rev Biochem. 1990;59:543–568. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.59.070190.002551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chan H. S., Dill K. A. Polymer principles in protein structure and stability. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1991;20:447–490. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.20.060191.002311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Covell D. G., Jernigan R. L. Conformations of folded proteins in restricted spaces. Biochemistry. 1990 Apr 3;29(13):3287–3294. doi: 10.1021/bi00465a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dropulic B., Smith S. M., Jeang K. T. Activation and inactivation of gene expression using RNA sequences. Adv Pharmacol. 1994;30:247–270. doi: 10.1016/s1054-3589(08)60176-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dropulić B., Lin N. H., Jeang K. T. A method to increase the cumulative cleavage efficiency of ribozymes: thermal cycling. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 May 11;21(9):2273–2274. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.9.2273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forster A. C., Symons R. H. Self-cleavage of plus and minus RNAs of a virusoid and a structural model for the active sites. Cell. 1987 Apr 24;49(2):211–220. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90562-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fu D. J., McLaughlin L. W. Importance of specific adenosine N7-nitrogens for efficient cleavage by a hammerhead ribozyme. A model for magnesium binding. Biochemistry. 1992 Nov 17;31(45):10941–10949. doi: 10.1021/bi00160a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gautheret D., Cedergren R. Modeling the three-dimensional structure of RNA. FASEB J. 1993 Jan;7(1):97–105. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.7.1.7678567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodchild J., Kohli V. Ribozymes that cleave an RNA sequence from human immunodeficiency virus: the effect of flanking sequence on rate. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1991 Feb 1;284(2):386–391. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(91)90313-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Haseloff J., Gerlach W. L. Simple RNA enzymes with new and highly specific endoribonuclease activities. Nature. 1988 Aug 18;334(6183):585–591. doi: 10.1038/334585a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hertel K. J., Herschlag D., Uhlenbeck O. C. A kinetic and thermodynamic framework for the hammerhead ribozyme reaction. Biochemistry. 1994 Mar 22;33(11):3374–3385. doi: 10.1021/bi00177a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hinds D. A., Levitt M. Exploring conformational space with a simple lattice model for protein structure. J Mol Biol. 1994 Nov 4;243(4):668–682. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(94)90040-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hubbard J. M., Hearst J. E. Predicting the three-dimensional folding of transfer RNA with a computer modeling protocol. Biochemistry. 1991 Jun 4;30(22):5458–5465. doi: 10.1021/bi00236a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Long D. M., Uhlenbeck O. C. Kinetic characterization of intramolecular and intermolecular hammerhead RNAs with stem II deletions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6977–6981. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lustig B., Covell D. G., Jernigan R. L. Conformations of t-RNA: base pairing and stacking. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1994 Aug;12(1):145–161. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1994.10508093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Major F., Turcotte M., Gautheret D., Lapalme G., Fillion E., Cedergren R. The combination of symbolic and numerical computation for three-dimensional modeling of RNA. Science. 1991 Sep 13;253(5025):1255–1260. doi: 10.1126/science.1716375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Malhotra A., Tan R. K., Harvey S. C. Modeling large RNAs and ribonucleoprotein particles using molecular mechanics techniques. Biophys J. 1994 Jun;66(6):1777–1795. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80972-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Malhotra A., Tan R. K., Harvey S. C. Prediction of the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit: a molecular mechanics approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Mar;87(5):1950–1954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.5.1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. McCall M. J., Hendry P., Jennings P. A. Minimal sequence requirements for ribozyme activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 1;89(13):5710–5714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Michel F., Westhof E. Modelling of the three-dimensional architecture of group I catalytic introns based on comparative sequence analysis. J Mol Biol. 1990 Dec 5;216(3):585–610. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(90)90386-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pley H. W., Flaherty K. M., McKay D. B. Three-dimensional structure of a hammerhead ribozyme. Nature. 1994 Nov 3;372(6501):68–74. doi: 10.1038/372068a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ruffner D. E., Stormo G. D., Uhlenbeck O. C. Sequence requirements of the hammerhead RNA self-cleavage reaction. Biochemistry. 1990 Nov 27;29(47):10695–10702. doi: 10.1021/bi00499a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sali A., Shakhnovich E., Karplus M. Kinetics of protein folding. A lattice model study of the requirements for folding to the native state. J Mol Biol. 1994 Feb 4;235(5):1614–1636. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Skolnick J., Kolinski A. Simulations of the folding of a globular protein. Science. 1990 Nov 23;250(4984):1121–1125. doi: 10.1126/science.250.4984.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Stern S., Weiser B., Noller H. F. Model for the three-dimensional folding of 16 S ribosomal RNA. J Mol Biol. 1988 Nov 20;204(2):447–481. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(88)90588-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Thomas D. J. Concepts in protein folding. FEBS Lett. 1992 Jul 27;307(1):10–13. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80892-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tuschl T., Eckstein F. Hammerhead ribozymes: importance of stem-loop II for activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Aug 1;90(15):6991–6994. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.6991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tuschl T., Gohlke C., Jovin T. M., Westhof E., Eckstein F. A three-dimensional model for the hammerhead ribozyme based on fluorescence measurements. Science. 1994 Nov 4;266(5186):785–789. doi: 10.1126/science.7973630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Uhlenbeck O. C. A small catalytic oligoribonucleotide. Nature. 1987 Aug 13;328(6131):596–600. doi: 10.1038/328596a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Westhof E., Dumas P., Moras D. Restrained refinement of two crystalline forms of yeast aspartic acid and phenylalanine transfer RNA crystals. Acta Crystallogr A. 1988 Mar 1;44(Pt 2):112–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang J. H., Perreault J. P., Labuda D., Usman N., Cedergren R. Mixed DNA/RNA polymers are cleaved by the hammerhead ribozyme. Biochemistry. 1990 Dec 25;29(51):11156–11160. doi: 10.1021/bi00503a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES