Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 25.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Biol. 2011 Mar 25;18(3):392–401. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.12.017

Directed evolution of protease beacons that enable sensitive detection of endogenous MT1-MMP activity in tumor cell lines

Abeer Jabaiah 1, Patrick S Daugherty 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC3073733  NIHMSID: NIHMS267770  PMID: 21439484

Abstract

Directed evolution was applied to identify peptide substrates with enhanced hydrolysis rates by MT1-MMP suitable for protease beacon development. Screening of a random pentapeptide library, using two-color CLiPS, yielded several substrates identical to motifs in distinct collagens that shared the consensus sequence P-x-G↓L. To identify substrates with enhanced cleavage rates, a second-generation decapeptide library incorporating the consensus was screened under stringent conditions, which resulted in a MxPLG↓M/LMG/AR consensus motif. These substrates are hydrolyzed by human-MT1-MMP up to six times faster than reported peptide substrates and are stable in plasma. Finally, incubation of soluble protease beacons incorporating the optimized substrates, but not previous substrates, enabled direct detection of endogenous MT1-MMP activity of human-fibrosarcoma (HT-1080) cells. Extended substrate libraries coupled with CLiPS should be useful to generate more effective activity probes for a variety of proteolytic enzymes.

Introduction

The extracellular degradation of collagen is an essential step during developmental processes and in the remodeling and rapid growth of tissues. Collagen degradation is regulated by the expression, activation, and inhibition of several matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). MMP family members including MMP-1, 2, 8, 9, 13, membrane type-1 MMP (MT1-MMP or MMP-14), and MT2-MMP are known to hydrolyze collagens (Aimes and Quigley, 1995; Haas et al., 1998; Knauper et al., 1997; Krane et al., 1996; Niyibizi et al., 1994; Ohuchi et al., 1997; Patterson et al., 2001). Although, most collagenases are secreted, MT1-MMP is membrane-anchored and has been found to mediate localized collagenolysis and invasive activity to both normal and malignant cells (Sabeh et al., 2009). MT1-MMP has been reported to cleave several types of collagen including types I, II, and III collagens (Ohuchi et al., 1997). Mice deficient in MT1-MMP exhibit inadequate collagen turnover and prominent defects that include dwarfism, arthritis, and connective tissue disease (Holmbeck K., 1999; Kenn et al., 2004). In addition, MT1-MMP deficient mice display loss of collagenolytic activity in skin fibroblast cells (Holmbeck K., 1999), and similar outcomes were observed in human fibroblasts and tumor cells when MT1-MMP expression was silenced by interfering RNA (Holmbeck K., 1999; Lee et al., 2006; Sabeh et al., 2004). These observations support the assertion that MT1-MMP serves an important and non-redundant role in collagenolysis during a variety of physiological processes.

In addition to MT1-MMPs role in collagenolysis, several studies have reported that MT1-MMP is capable of hydrolyzing a variety of substrates including gelatin, β-casein, κ-elastin, and basement membrane or interstitial-associated proteins of the extracellular matrix (ECM) including fibronectin, vitronectin, laminin-1 and 5 (d'Ortho et al., 1997; Hornebeck and Maquart, 2003; Ohuchi et al., 1997; Pei and Weiss, 1996; Sato et al., 2005). Additionally, MT1-MMP contributes to shedding of cell adhesion molecules, such as CD44H which plays an important role in lymphocyte activation and homing, T-cell activation, angiogenesis, and metastasis (Goodison et al., 1999; Kajita et al., 2001; Trochon et al., 1996). Also, several biologically relevant MT1-MMP substrates cleaved in cellular context were identified by quantitative proteomics methods using isotope-coded affinity tag labeling with tandem mass spectrometry, such as pentraxin 3, galectin-1, proTNFα and Hsp90α (Butler et al., 2008; Tam et al., 2004). In addition to cleaving ECM proteins, MT1-MMP also has been found to activate MMP zymogens such as proMMP-2, proMMP-8 and proMMP-13 that are involved in tumor cell invasion and metastasis (Folgueras, 2004; Holopainen et al., 2003; Itoh and Seiki, 2004; Will et al., 1996). Elevated MT1-MMP activity has been detected in tumor and tumor stromal cells of many tissue types but particularly in brain, lung, gastric, and breast carcinoma tissues (Atkinson et al., 2007; Bisson et al., 2003; Lampert et al., 1998; Malhotra et al., 2002; Okada et al., 1995). Thus, MT1-MMP has been demonstrated to play an essential role in cell migration, invasion, cell morphology, metastasis, and angiogenesis in normal physiological and pathological events (Itoh and Seiki, 2004; Seiki, 2003; Stamenkovic, 2000; Zhou Z., 2000).

Given MT1-MMP's diverse functions, inhibitors and probes have been developed to inhibit or measure MT1-MMP activity in vivo (Devy et al., 2009; Fujita et al., 2003). For example, a FRET-based biosensor has been shown to enable detection and localization of MT1-MMP activity on the membrane of HeLa cells that are co-transfected with both the membrane-anchored MT1-MMP probe and MT1-MMP (Ouyang et al., 2008). However, the MT1-MMP cleavable substrate used in the probe was hydrolyzed at a similar rate by MT2-MMP and MT3-MMP, and the method required a high concentration of MT1-MMP (∼60 nM) for cleavage. In another strategy, a MT1-MMP-activated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging probe was constructed by fusing a radionuclide to an inhibited cell penetrating peptide (CPP) to selectively target MT1-MMP expressing cells. However, the probe was also activated in cells that do not express MT1-MMP, indicating non-specific cleavage of the MT1-MMP substrate by other MMPs (Watkins et al., 2009). Thus the specific detection of MT1-MMP activity in cell culture and in vivo will require substrates with improved activity and selectivity.

The substrate specificity of MT1-MMP has been investigated in several previous studies. Using the substrate phage display method, the consensus substrate sequence for MT1-MMP was found to be PxG/PL at the P3-P1′ sites (Ohkubo et al., 1999). Most of the substrates identified using this method were also cleaved by MMP-2 and MMP-9. Another study using the substrate phage methodology suggested that the specificity for MT1-MMP can be conferred by arginine at the P4 position and the absence of proline at the P3 position through mutational analysis (Kridel et al., 2002). However, phage library selections did not reveal a clear consensus for MT1-MMP selective substrates (Kridel et al., 2002). In addition, these studies did not characterize the activity and selectivity of other collagenases toward the MT1-MMP substrates. Consequently, we sought to identify MT1-MMP substrates that exhibit rapid hydrolysis rates using two color cellular libraries of peptide substrates (CLiPS) (Boulware and Daugherty, 2006; Boulware et al., 2010). Using CLiPS methodology, substrates are displayed on the surface of bacterial cells, allowing quantitative measurement of the extent of substrate cleavage using flow cytometry - an advantage over substrate phage. The use of CLiPS and substrate extension provided a highly effective directed evolution strategy, wherein selection stringency could be tuned using FACS. We applied this method to identify enhanced substrates suitable for direct MT1-MMP activity measurements in cells.

Results

Identification and directed evolution of MT1-MMP substrates using CLiPS

To identify optimal five residue cleavage motifs for MT1-MMP, a cellular library of peptide substrates (CLiPS) consisting of more than 107 unique random pentamer substrates displayed on the surface of E. coli (Boulware and Daugherty, 2006) was screened using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS). A two-step screening process was applied to enrich library members that display substrates efficiently cleaved by the catalytic domain of MT1-MMP. First, cells exhibiting green and red (green+ red+) fluorescence were sorted after labeling with a red fluorescent probe, streptavidin R-phycoerythin (SA-PE), that recognizes the uncleaved N-terminus and a green fluorescent probe (AlajGFP-Mona SH3) that binds to the scaffold's C-terminus irrespective of cleavage. In the second step, library members with cleaved substrates (green+ red-) were sorted after incubation with MT1-MMP (80 nM for 2 h) and labeling with red and green probes. The process was repeated to enrich clones displaying rapidly cleaved substrates (Figure 1). Individual identified substrates exhibited a clear preference for proline at the P3 position, glycine at the P1 position, and a medium-sized hydrophobic residue (L, M, I) at the P1′ position; the resulting consensus substrate sequence was P-x-G-(L/M/I). Additionally, the P2′ position exhibited a modest preference for arginine, methionine, or leucine. The pentapeptide substrates identified by CLiPS exhibited a high degree of identity to motifs in known substrates including several collagen types. In fact, the most rapidly cleaved substrate PQGLL is identical to a known pentapeptide motif in type-1 collagen.

Figure 1. Use of FACS to screen peptide substrate libraries (CLiPS) for MT1-MMP substrates.

Figure 1

Flow cytometric analysis of cell populations representing the 5-mer random library prior to screening without MT1-MMP (A) or with MT1-MMP (B), the final sorted populations from the 5-mer random library without (C) or with MT1-MMP (D), and the 10-mer focused library without (E) or with (F) MT1-MMP. See also Table S1.

In an effort to identify substrates with improved hydrolysis rates and identify residue preferences further from the scissile bond, a secondary library of the form xxxPx (G/P)(L/M/I)xxx was constructed. Screening the extended substrate library under more stringent conditions (60 nM MT1-MMP for 1 h) enriched a population with substantially improved cleavage kinetics when compared to the primary random library (Figure 1). Lower concentrations of MT1-MMP (20 and 30 nM), and shorter incubation times (15 and 25 minutes) were attempted but did not enrich improved substrates. Individual clones randomly selected from the final sort exhibited a consensus of (M/L)xPLG(L/M)(L/M)(G/A)(R/K) (Table 1). Lysine and arginine were observed at the P4′ position in about half of the substrates. The substrates identified using CLiPS were searched against the human proteome using the ScanProsite degenerate motif search algorithm, and several of the substrate sequences appeared in diverse ECM proteins (Table 2). Thus, screening of a second generation library constructed using pentapeptide consensus information yielded substrates that are hydrolyzed more rapidly by MT1-MMP than the first generation pentapeptide substrates.

Table 1. Amino acid sequences and second order rate constants for the substrates resulting from sorting the 5-mer random library (5-peptide), and the 10-mer focused library (10.peptide) for MT1-MMP.

Substrate P6 P5 P4 P3 P2 P1 P1′ P2′ P3′ P4′ P5′ P6′ P7′ kcat/KM (μM−1 Min−1)



5.1 s P Q G L L q 0.15 ± 0.01
5.2 s P Q G L R q 0.15 ± 0.02
5.3 s P M P L M A 0.12 ± 0.01
5.4 s P I G L R q 0.12 ± 0.02
5.5 s P Q G M L q 0.11 ± 0.01
5.6 s P R G M L q 0.11 ± 0.01
5.7 s P S G L R q 0.07 ± 0.01
5.8 s P R G I M q 0.06 ± 0.01
5.9 s P K G L L q 0.05 ± 0.01
5.10 s W G G L R q 0.02 ± 0.01
10.1 S L A P L G L Q R R 0.56 ± 0.02
10.2 W M K P Q G M R L M 0.54 ± 0.02
10.3 G M L P L G M R G S 0.40 ± 0.02
10.4 L Q L P S G L M G R 0.36 ± 0.04
10.5 W R A P L A L M S R 0.34 ± 0.03
10.6 G M V P V G L M A G 0.34 ± 0.04
10.7 V G E P R G M L A G S L K 0.32 ± 0.01
10.8 L R V P L G L M G K 0.32 ± 0.03
10.9 G M R P L G I A G R 0.16 ± 0.02

The second order rate constants were determined using flow cytometry. The consensus motif from the 5-mer library was P-x-(G)-(L/M/I), and for the 10-mer focused library the consensus motif was (M/L)-x-P-L-G-(L/M)-(L/M)-(G/A)-(R/K).

Table 2. Candidate MT1-MMP substrates identified using CLiPS/ScanPrositea.

Substrate sequence Human protein Site Swiss Prot #
PQGLL Collagen α-2 type I 863-867 P08123
Endoglin 296-300 P17813
Keratin type II 486-490 Q9NSB4
Otogelin 930-934 Q6ZR10
Agrin 1405-1409 O00468
PQGLR Collagen α-1 type VIII 233-237 P27658
Collagen α-3 type IX 419-423 Q14050
Interleukin-11 receptor α 221-225 Q14626
Interleukin-23 subunit α 79-83 Q9NPF7
Integrin β-4 103-107 P16144
LRP-6 607-611 O75581
PSGLR Fibronectin type III domain 10-14 Q9H6D8
Transforming growth factor β1 3-7 P01137
LRP-3 685-689 O75074
PKGLL Collagen α-1 type XXIV 787-791 Q17RW2
Platelet glycoprotein V 186-190 P40197
WGGLR Integrin α-5 744-748 P08648
APLGLQ Collagen α-3 type IX 497-501 Q14050
Thrombomodulin 217-221 P07204
LPSGL LPR-3 684-688 O75074
Lumican 199-204 P51884
PLGIA Collagen α -2 type I 896-900 P08123
Collagen α -1 type III 946-950 P02461
a

Candidate substrates have not been experimentally validated.

Characterization of substrate cleavage kinetics

The cleavage rate of individual substrates were initially measured and ranked for cell-displayed substrates (Table 1) as previously described (Boulware and Daugherty, 2006). Substrates from the 10-mer focused library exhibited up to four-fold enhanced hydrolysis rates on the cell surface relative to 5-mer substrates. Soluble protease activity probes (i.e., protease beacons) were constructed using fluorescent proteins optimized for FRET studies as previously described (Nguyen and Daugherty, 2005). Protease beacons were constructed for three decapeptide substrates (C-10.1-Y, C-10.2-Y, C-10.7-Y), the most rapidly hydrolyzed pentapeptide substrate (C-5.1-Y), and two substrates identified using either oriented peptide libraries (C-MPL-Y) (Turk et al., 2001) or substrate phage display (C-A42-Y) (Kridel et al., 2002). The lowest concentration of MT1-MMP that the FRET beacon can significantly detect was 0.3 nM (Figure S1). Extended ten-residue substrates were cleaved four- to six-fold faster than the most rapidly cleaved 5-mer PQGLL and previously reported peptide substrates (C-A42-L, C-MPL-Y) (Figure 2A, Table 3), as measured using fluorimetry.

Figure 2. Measurement of MT1-MMP activity using protease beacons.

Figure 2

(A) The mean extent of conversion of the FRET substrates was measured with respect to time after incubating with 2.5 nM MT1-MMP. (B) The mean extent of conversion of C-10.1-Y was monitored over time after incubating with 50 nM MT1-MMP and different concentrations of human plasma at 37 °C. See also Figure S1.

Table 3. Second order rate constants for MT1-MMP FRET substrates.

See also Table S2.

Substrate P6 P5 P4 P3 P2 P1 P1′ P2′ P3′ P4′ P5′ P6′ P7′ kcat/kM (μM−1 Min−1)

MT1-MMP MMP-1 aMMP-8





C-10.1-Y S L A P L G L Q R R 3.9 ± 0.1 0.28 ± 0.01 0.25 ± 0.01
C-10.2-Y W M K P Q G M R L M 3.3 ± 0.2 0.21 ± 0.01 0.67 ± 0.03
C-10.7-Y V G E P R G M L A G S L K 3.3 ± 0.2 0.39 ± 0.01 0.47 ± 0.04
C-A42-Y S G R I G F L R T A 0.56 ± 0.04 0.13 ± 0.01 ----
C-MPL-Y I P E S L R A 0.76 ± 0.08 0.99 ± 0.01 1.41 ± 0.05
C-5.1-Y P Q G L L 1.04 ± 0.06 0.35 ± 0.01 1.15 ± 0.06
a

Active site titration was not performed for MMP-8.

Standard deviation values are derived from triplicate measurements

Since the most rapidly cleaved substrate identified from the random library was identical (5/5 amino acids) to a known human type-1 collagen cleavage site PQGLL (Sato et al., 2005), substrate hydrolysis rates were also measured for human collagenases MMP-1, 2, 8, 9, 13, and MT2-MMP. Although selectivity was not explicitly favored during our screens, the most rapidly cleaved substrate (C-10.1-Y) exhibited selectivity for MT1-MMP over other collagenases, with the exception of MMP-9 (Table 3, Table S2). Kinetic constants (kcat/KM) measured using FRET substrates correlated with those measured for the corresponding substrate displayed on the cell surface, although the absolute values measured using the FRET beacons were roughly six-fold higher. The extended FRET substrate C-10.1-Y exhibited 3- to 14-fold selectivity for MT1-MMP over the other MMPs analyzed with the exception of MMP-9.

To investigate whether the optimized substrates might be suitable for in vivo imaging or prodrug applications, their stability was measured in human plasma (Figure 2B). In a ten-fold dilution of plasma, the limit of sensitivity for the FRET assay, substrate cleavage did not occur during a 4 hour incubation, indicating that the MT1-MMP activity was completely inhibited by human plasma even when diluted by ten-fold (10% plasma). The P-value was < 0.0001 when the MT1-MMP activity curves of 1% and 10% plasma was compared using two-way ANOVA analysis, indicating that the hydrolysis rates are statistically significant and MT1-MMP activity was detected only when plasma was diluted by at least 100-fold. Thus, the FRET substrates were stable in plasma and MT1-MMP activity was completely inhibited by 10% plasma likely due to the presence of TIMPs or other protease inhibitors in human plasma. Finally, since imaging or prodrug studies would benefit from cross-reactivity with mouse MT1-MMP, substrate conversion of C-10.1-Y by mouse and human MT1-MMP was measured and the decapeptide substrate was cleaved at an equivalent rate when incubated with either protease (Figure S2).

Measurement of endogenous MT1-MMP activity in human tumor cell lines

Given the improved cleavage rates of the extended substrates identified here relative to the reported MT1-MMP substrates (C-A42-Y, C-MPL-Y), we hypothesized that endogenous MT1-MMP activity of tumor cells could be quantified using substrate probes exhibiting FRET. The extent of conversion of all of the substrates did not exceed background when incubated for 4 h with MT1-MMP deficient breast carcinoma cells (MCF-7). However, human fibrosarcoma cells (HT-1080) expressing MT1-MMP mediated roughly 70% conversion in 4 h for the optimized substrates (Figure 3), while conversion of previously reported substrates (C-A42-Y, C-MPL-Y) did not rise above 20%, making activity detection difficult. Non-specific hydrolysis by the possible presence of soluble proteases, shed or vesicular MT1-MMP could not be detected since serum-free conditioned supernatants did not mediate detectable cleavage under the same assay conditions. In addition to MT1-MMP, HT-1080 cells have been reported to express other MMPs including MT2-MMP and MMP-2 (Ito et al., 2010; Sato and Takino, 2010). Importantly, MT1-MMP was solely responsible for protease beacon activation by HT1080, since activation was completely inhibited by a selective, high affinity anti-MT1-MMP antibody (DX-2400) (Devy et al., 2009) (Figure S3). Again, plasma addition strongly inhibited substrate cleavage by cell lines, though activity was detectable at up to 5% plasma (Figure S3). Thus, in cell-based assays, the enhanced substrates provided at least six-fold increased sensitivity relative to previously reported substrates (C-A42-Y, C-MPL-Y), enabling detection of endogenous MT1-MMP activity.

Figure 3. Measurement of MT1-MMP activity in tumor cells using protease beacons.

Figure 3

MT1-MMP FRET beacons were incubated with MCF-7 and HT1080 cells or conditioned media and substrate conversion was monitored over time at 37 °C. See also Figures S2 and S3.

Discussion

Matrix metalloproteinases exhibit similar active site structures that can account for the high similarity of short peptide substrates for different MMP family members and the difficulty in designing small molecule inhibitors that are selective for particular MMPs (Hooper, 1994; Stocker et al., 1995). For instance, several MMPs recognize peptide substrates that contain the P-x-x-Φ motif (where Φ is a hydrophobic amino acid) similar to those found in gelatins and collagens (Chen et al., 2002; Deng et al., 2000; Kridel et al., 2001). The extended substrates identified here, exhibited significantly increased rates of hydrolysis by MT1-MMP when compared to shorter substrates. In previous studies that involved screening of random peptide libraries for MT1-MMP substrates, substrates with the highest cleavage rates exhibited poor selectivity and were cleaved at similar or greater rates by non-target proteases (Kridel et al., 2002; Ohkubo et al., 1999). However, activity enhancement via substrate extension yielded substrates that were preferentially cleaved by MT1-MMP when compared to several closely related MMP family members. Even so, our results indicate that substrate extension provides a straightforward approach to increase substrate contacts with the protease surface neighboring the catalytic cleft to improve substrate recognition and hydrolysis rates.

Quantitative activity-based substrate library screening combined with bioinformatic analysis identified a group of candidate physiological substrates localized in the ECM and on cell surfaces. In vitro methods for protease specificity characterization, although useful for active site specificity analysis, are often insufficient to unambiguously identify physiological substrates. For example, solution phase positional scanning or oriented peptide libraries can quickly reveal the full spectrum of subsite preferences, but do not identify cooperative effects nor individual preferred substrates that implicate physiological substrates (Schneider and Craik, 2009; Turk et al., 2001). Substrate phage (Deperthes, 2002) and CLiPS methods (Boulware and Daugherty, 2006) can implicate physiological substrates, primarily for relatively specific enzymes that cleave a smaller number of substrates. Here, screening for rapid cleavage yielded pentapeptide substrates that are identical to motifs in several human collagens, including types (I, III, VIII, IX, etc). Use of ScanProSite revealed that PQGLR is identical to a known substrate within human type IX collagen (α3) and type VIII collagen (α1). Substrates PQGLL and PIGLR occur in type I collagen (α2) and type XI collagen (α1) respectively (Sato et al., 2005). Furthermore, PMPLMA is similar to the sequence PSPII, a cleavage site for proMMP-2 activation (Ohkubo et al., 1999). In addition to collagens, the optimal pentapeptide PQGLL substrate motif occurs 51 times in the human genome and conspicuously occurs in a variety of ECM proteins including keratin type II, agrin (a laminin associated protein of the basal lamina (Remacle A. G., 2006)), and endoglin (a major endothelial cell glycoprotein involved in cell migration (Garcia-Pozo et al., 2008)). Moreover, the extended consensus motif PxGLxxR is present in multiple integrins, disintegrin, and metalloprotease (ADAM) family proteases whose cleavage could activate an invasive program in cascade fashion. Thus, extended substrate consensus data suggested an array of candidate physiological substrates present within the ECM. Even so, our results suggest that collagenolysis is a primary function of MT1-MMP.

CLiPS provided a highly effective tool for substrate discovery and optimization, owing to quantitative library analysis and screening using FACS. Substrate phage, proteome-derived database-searchable peptide libraries, positional scanning combinatorial libraries and CLiPS have been applied to identify substrates but typically have not been used for directed evolution (Boulware and Daugherty, 2006; Deperthes, 2002; Harris et al., 2000; Schilling and Overall, 2008). CLiPS has been shown to enable substrate identification for both promiscuous and highly specific proteases including caspase-3, enteropeptidase (Boulware and Daugherty, 2006), staphylopains A and B from Staphylococcus aureas (Dubin et al., 2008; Stec-Niemczyk et al., 2009), karolysin, an MMP-like protease from a periodontal pathogen (Karim et al., 2010), and here, MT1-MMP. CLiPS has also enabled directed evolution of substrate activity for the tobacco etch virus TEV nuclear inclusion protease, which identified substrates with high sequence similarity to the native TEV substrate (Boulware et al., 2010). For MT1-MMP, flow cytometric population analysis enabled efficient identification of the concentration and reaction time that would yield only the most rapidly cleaved substrates. Although not favored explicitly during screening, selectivity could be further evolved by counter screening to remove substrates that are cleaved by other proteases.

Detecting and measuring the activity of proteases including MMPs in vivo and in ex vivo tissues remains a challenge. Proteolytic activity is usually detected using gelatin or collagen zymography, in situ zymography or protease beacons (Snoek-van Beurden and Von den Hoff, 2005). However, protease activity probes frequently suffer from insufficient selectivity and activity, and can be expensive to synthesize. Zymography methods do not generally identify the protease species hydrolyzing the substrate, since they report the activity of a variety of proteases that can degrade gelatin or collagen including many MMPs, cathepsins and stratum corneum thiol protease (Hashimoto et al., 2006; Platt et al., 2006; Watkinson, 1999). Furthermore, reliable identification of the active MMP species in zymograms can be difficult due to the fact that MMPs can form complexes (Snoek-van Beurden and Von den Hoff, 2005). In an attempt to address this limitation, several protease imaging probes or protease beacons have been designed to detect individual protease activities in vitro and in vivo (Chen et al., 2009; Jiang et al., 2004; Law and Tung, 2009; Wunder et al., 2004). However, frequently utilized chromogenic and fluorogenic substrate probes lack prime side amino acids that influence activity and selectivity. The FRET beacons developed here using FRET-optimized fluorescent proteins yielded a large dynamic range (20-fold) to enable highly sensitive MT1-MMP detection. Thus, the present study demonstrates that extended substrate peptides can provide critical gain of function for the detection, localization, and quantification of activity of specific proteases in vitro, providing a new tool for basic and applied studies of proteolytic enzymes.

Significance

Given the diverse roles of MT1-MMP in normal physiological and pathological events, especially in cell invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis, several imaging probes have been designed to report MT1-MMP activity. However, the utility of these probes is limited by their low sensitivity and selectivity for MT1-MMP. Here, improved MT1-MMP substrates were developed using CLiPS to iteratively evolve activity. The best substrates identified exhibited substantially greater hydrolysis rates than previously identified peptide substrates, and preferential cleavage by MT1-MMP over several other family members. These extended substrates, when incorporated into FRET beacons, enabled direct detection of endogenous MT1-MMP activity in tumor cell lines. Thus, the present substrate discovery approach should have utility for developing improved protease-activity probes for a variety of in vivo and ex vivo applications.

Experimental Procedures

Cell lines and reagents

Human fibrosarcoma (HT1080) and breast carcinoma (MCF-7) cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). Tumor cells were cultured in Minimum Essential Medium (Eagle) or RPMI-1640 from ATCC supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 50 μg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Ca). Bacterial experiments were performed with E. coli strain MC1060 and grown in LB medium supplemented with 34 ug/ml chloramphenicol. Soluble catalytic domains of matrix metalloproteinases: MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-9, MMP-13 and MT1-MMP were obtained from BIOMOL International LP (Plymouth Meeting, PA). MT2-MMP was obtained from Chemicon (Ca). Ni-NTA resin was purchased from Qiagen. Streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin (SAPE) was from Invitrogen. BPER-II Bacterial Protein Extraction Reagent was from Pierce (Rockford, IL). Oligonucleotides were from Operon Biotechnologies (Huntsville, AL) and restriction enzymes were from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). Human (ID 6046773) and Murine (ID 30658833) MT1-MMP cDNA were purchased from Open Biosystems. DX-2400 anti-MT1-MMP antibody was provided as a generous gift from Dyax (Cambridge, MA). Galardin GM-6001 was purchased from Enzo life Sciences (Plymouth Meeting, PA).

Construction of substrate library (CLiPS) and plasmids

The two color CLiPS 5-mer random library (pBSGXP2) previously described (Boulware et al., 2010) was used to enrich for cleavable peptides for MT1-MMP. Plasmid (pBSGXP2-2) was constructed with a streptavidin-binding peptide (WVCHPMWEVMCLR) (Rice et al., 2006), and linker (GGSGQSGLGSGSGSGSGQSG) on the N-terminus of CPX, and binding peptide of SLP-76 (PAPSIDRSTKPPL, P2) on the C-terminus. Plasmid pBSGXP2-2 was constructed by using the pBSGXP2 (Boulware et al., 2010) as a template and was amplified with primers 1 and 2 (Table S1) to remove the SfiI site upstream of the SA-PE binding peptide. The PCR fragment was then amplified with primers 3 and 4 to append a SfiI site downstream of the SA-PE binding peptide. Similarly, a 10-mer focused library of the form x-x-x-P-x-(G/P)-(L/M/I)-x-x-x was constructed with the pBSGXP2 as a template for PCR with primers 5 and 6. The PCR product was digested with SfiI, ligated into similarly digested pBSGXP2-2, and transformed into electro-competent E. coli yielding 8×107 independent transformants.

The CyPet-YPet caspase substrate plasmid (pBCcpY) was used as a template plasmid to construct the MT1-MMP cleavable FRET substrates (Nguyen and Daugherty, 2005). The CyPet gene in pBCcpY was replaced with another having optimized codons for E. coli expression (Codon Devices). FRET substrates were constructed to encode the MT1-MMP substrates by amplifying YPet using the new plasmid template with forward primer 7 (all substrates except the 10.7) and 8 (for 10.7) to add a GGSQSAG linker on the N-terminus of YPet, and reverse primer 9. The PCR fragment was amplified with reverse primer 1 and forward primers 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, to encode the substrates represented in 10.1, 10.2, 10.7, 5.1, a substrate reported in (Kridel et al., 2002), and a substrate reported in Turk (Turk et al., 2001) respectively. The PCR fragments were then digested with KpnI and SphI and ligated with the similarly digested plasmid (pBCcpY-2) to yield the plasmid C-10.1-Y, C-10.2-Y, C-10.7-Y, C-5.1-Y, C-A42-Y, and C-MPL-Y.

Genes encoding the catalytic domains of mouse and human MT1-MMP (a.a. Y112-R299) were amplified with forward primers 16 and 17 and reverse primers 18 and 19 respectively to append a SfiI restriction site upstream of the C-terminal hexa-histidine tag. The resulting PCR products were amplified with forward primers 16 and 17 and reverse primer 20 to add a SfiI restriction site at the C-terminus. The PCR fragments were digested with SfiI and ligated into a similarly digested plasmid (pBCcpY-2).

Identification of peptide substrates for MT1-MMP using CLiPS

To screen the 5-mer random library, the overnight bacterial culture was subcultured 1:50 for 2 h at 37 °C and then induced with 0.1% (w/v) L-(+)-arabinose for 3 h at room temperature. Approximately 108 cells were washed with reaction buffer, and then pelleted. The reaction buffer was 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5) supplemented with 20 mM NaCl, 2mM CaCl2 and 10 μM ZnCl2. The pelleted cells were then resuspended in 20 μl of reaction buffer and the volume was then divided in half. The first sample was incubated with 80 nM MT1-MMP and the second sample was incubated in the absence of enzyme, and both reaction samples were incubated at room temperature with shaking for 2 h. The samples were then diluted 1:100 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS pH 7.4) to impede the reaction, then resuspended in PBS supplemented with 50 nM SA-PE and 250 nM AlajGFP-Mona SH3 to label the cells and were incubated at 4 °C for 1h. The labeled cells were then washed with PBS and analyzed on a FACSAria (BD Biosciences) with 488 nm excitation and fluorescence at 530 nm and 576 nm was measured. A total of eight sorts were performed, alternating between isolating for cells that properly display substrates while excluding potential AlajGFP-Mona SH3 ligands in the absence of MT1-MMP (green+ red+) and then sorting cells with cleaved substrates after incubating with MT1-MMP (green+ red−). Cells from the final round of sorting were plated to isolate single clones for DNA sequencing. The 10-mer focused library was screened similarly, with the exception that the cells were incubated with MT1-MMP (60 nM) at room temperature for 1 h with shaking, and after labeling the cells. A total of seven sorts were performed; four for cleavage and three for display, while alternating between sorting for display and for cleavage.

Characterization of the activity of cell displayed substrates

To measure the extent of conversion of cell displayed substrates, the overnight bacterial cultures of the clones from the final sort of the 5-mer random library were subcultured as before in duplicate samples, and substrate display was induced for 3.5 h at room temperature. Cells were washed and resuspended in reaction buffer (10 μl) and the volume was then divided in half (each 5 μl), the first sample was incubated with 80 nM MT1-MMP and the second sample was incubated without enzyme (10 μl final reaction volume), and both reaction samples were incubated at room temperature with shaking for 45 and 75 minutes. Cells were washed and labeled with 50 nM SA-PE. The labeled cells were again washed in PBS and their fluorescence was measured by flow cytometry. Conversions for 10-mer substrates were similarly measured in duplicate after 20 and 40 minute incubations at room temperature. Conversion was calculated using the expression:

conversion=FRFR+FRF0 Eq. 1

where FR is the red fluorescence after incubation without the enzyme, FR+ is the red fluorescence after incubation with the enzyme, and F0 is the fluorescence of unlabeled cells. It has been reported that the KM of MT1-MMP for a short peptide substrate is ∼10 μM (Toth et al., 2002). The Michaelis-Menton equation can then be simplified into a linear first order equation since the concentration of substrates expressed on the surface of the cells ([S]) is approximately 0.08 μM and KM ≫[S]. Thus, the second order rate constant can be expressed as

kcatkM=Ln[(1Conversion)][E]t Eq. 2

Where [E] is the enzyme concentration, and t is the time at which the conversion measurement was taken (Boulware and Daugherty, 2006). The reported kcat/KM values are averages at the two different time points.

Measurement of MT1-MMP activity using protease beacons

The concentrations of active MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9, MMP-13, MT1-MMP, and MT2-MMP were determined by active site titration with MMP tight inhibitor Galardin. To determine the second order rates constants of the substrates in soluble form, bacterial cultures expressing the C-terminal hexa-histidine tagged protease beacons were subcultured 1:100 in 40 ml volume for 2 h at 37 °C, and then induced with 0.2% (w/v) L-(+)-Arabinose for 18 h at room temperature. Expressed protein was extracted from cells using B-PER II reagent and was further purified using affinity chromatography by using Ni-NTA and following the suggested protocol. The concentration of the protein was measured by using a standard curve of fluorescence intensity at 527 nm as a function of YPet concentration when excited with 514 nm. The hydrolysis reaction for each peptide was performed in triplicate in 100 μl total volume using the same reaction buffer with 120 nM FRET substrate. To monitor the cleavage of the peptides, the fluorescence emission at 485 nm and 527 nm was measured every 5 minutes upon excitation with 433 nm using a Tecan Safire™ fluorescence spectrophotometer (Tecan, Durham, NC). To determine the minimum concentration of MT1-MMP needed for hydrolysis detection, C-10.1-Y substrate was incubated with different concentrations of MT1-MMP (25 nM, 8 nM, 2.5 nM, 0.92 nM, and 0.3 nM) were incubated with C-10.1-Y at 37 °C for 4 hr. The substrates were also treated with 8 nM MMP-1, 8 nM MMP-8 and 2.5 nM MT1-MMP at room temperature for 4 h to analyze substrate selectivity. In a separate assay, the FRET substrates were also treated with 2.2 nM MMP-2, 3.9 nM MMP-9, 2.3 nM MMP-13, 3.2 nM MT2-MMP, and 1.5 nM MT1-MMP at 37 °C for 4 h to analyze substrate selectivity. The second order rate constants (kcat/KM) were then calculated by fitting the substrate conversion to the simplified Michaelis-Menton equation (Eq. 2). The extent of conversion of the FRET substrates at different time points was determined using the following equation:

Conversion=FRiFRtFRiFRmin Eq. 3

Where FRi is the initial FRET ratio (527:485 nm), FRmin is the minimum FRET ratio, and FRt is the FRET ratio at a particular time point after subtracting the background fluorescence. The second order rate constant (kcat/KM) was determined by fitting to Eq. 2. To determine whether endopeptidases present in heparinized human plasma could hydrolyze the FRET substrates, individual substrates (120 nM) were incubated in 10% plasma in 100 μl total volume using the same reaction buffer at 37 °C for 4 h. To determine if human plasma influences the activity of MT1-MMP, C-10.1-Y was incubated with 10%, 1% and 0% plasma with 50 nM MT1-MMP in 100 μl reaction volume using same reaction buffer at 37 °C for 4 h. The hydrolysis of the substrates was monitored by measuring the emission fluorescence at 485 nm and 527 nm as described (Boulware and Daugherty, 2006). To determine whether the peptide substrates were cross reactive with murine MT1-MMP, both mMT1-MMP and hMT1-MMP catalytic domains were expressed recombinantly in E. coli then extracted from cells using B-PER II reagent and purified using Ni-NTA. The expressed proteases were then incubated with 1 nM hMT1-MMP (Biomol) for 1 h at 4 °C and 30 min at 37 °C to auto-activate the proteases (Koo et al., 2002). Then 120 nM of C-10.1-Y was incubated with 10 μM of the expressed MT1-MMP. The FRET substrate was also incubated with the reaction buffer and 1nM MT1-MMP to verify that hydrolysis was not a result of the added protease. Substrate conversion was monitored by measuring the fluorescence emission at 485 nm and 527 nm.

Measurement of MT1-MMP activity in tumor cell lines using protease beacons

To measure tumor cell associated substrate cleavage, HT-1080 or MCF-7 cells were washed with reaction buffer and cultured in RPMI-1640 (without FBS or phenyl-red indicator) for 18 h. Cells were then scraped and pelleted. The medium was collected and the cells were washed twice with 5 ml of reaction buffer. The FRET substrates at 120 nM final concentration were then incubated with the tumor cells in 100 μl reaction volume using the same reaction buffer at 37 °C for 4 h in duplicate. In another assay, the substrates were incubated with tumor cell conditioned media in duplicate to determine if any soluble protease can cleave the substrates. To determine whether hydrolysis is due to MT1-MMP and not other MMPs, HT-1080 cells were incubated with a highly selective anti-MT1-MMP antibody antagonist at 90 nM DX-2400 for 1 hr at 4 °C. The cells were then incubated with 120 nM of C-10.1-Y at 37 °C in 100 μl reaction volume. To determine if plasma can inhibit proteases produced by the tumor cells, the FRET substrate C-10.1-Y was incubated with HT-1080 cells with the following dilutions of human plasma in duplicate: 0%, 1%, 5%, and 20%, and hydrolysis was monitored as described above.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

We thank Kevin T. Boulware for advice and technical assistance. Funding for this work was provided by the NIH-NCI Center of Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence (CCNE); 5 U54 CA119335-04 Project 3; and a NIH-NHLBI Program of Excellence in Nanotechnology; 5 U01 HL080718-04.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Aimes RT, Quigley JP. Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Is an Interstitial Collagenase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1995;270:5872–5876. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.11.5872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson JM, Pennington CJ, Martin SW, Anikin VA, Mearns AJ, Loadman PM, Edwards DR, Gill JH. Membrane type matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) show differential expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to normal lung: Correlation of MMP-14 mRNA expression and proteolytic activity. European Journal of Cancer. 2007;43:1764. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bisson C, Blacher S, Polette M, Blanc JF, Kebers F, Desreux J, Tetu B, Rosenbaum J, Foidart JM, Birembaut P, et al. Restricted expression of membrane type 1-matrix metalloproteinase by myofibroblasts adjacent to human breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2003;105:7–13. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boulware KT, Daugherty PS. Protease specificity determination by using cellular libraries of peptide substrates (CLiPS) PNAS. 2006;103:7583–7588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0511108103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boulware KT, Jabaiah A, Daugherty PS. Evolutionary optimization of peptide substrates for proteases that exhibit rapid hydrolysis kinetics. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2010;106:339. doi: 10.1002/bit.22693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Butler GS, Dean RA, Tam EM, Overall CM. Pharmacoproteomics of a metalloproteinase hydroxamate inhibitor in breast cancer cells: dynamics of membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase-mediated membrane protein shedding. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:4896–4914. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01775-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen EI, Kridel SJ, Howard EW, Li W, Godzik A, Smith JW. A unique substrate recognition profile for matrix metalloproteinase-2. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:4485–4491. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109469200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen J, Liu TW, Lo PC, Wilson BC, Zheng G. “Zipper” Molecular Beacons: A Generalized Strategy to Optimize the Performance of Activatable Protease Probes. Bioconjug Chem. 2009 doi: 10.1021/bc900207k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. d'Ortho MP, Will H, Atkinson S, Butler G, Messent A, Gavrilovic J, Smith B, Timpl R, Zardi L, Murphy G. Membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 2 exhibit broad-spectrum proteolytic capacities comparable to many matrix metalloproteinases. Eur J Biochem. 1997;250:751–757. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.00751.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deng SJ, Bickett DM, Mitchell JL, Lambert MH, Blackburn RK, Carter HL, Neugebauer J, Pahel G, Weiner MP, Moss ML. Substrate Specificity of Human Collagenase 3 Assessed Using a Phage-displayed Peptide Library. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275:31422–31427. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004538200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Deperthes D. Phage Display Substrate: A Blind Method for Determining Protease Specificity. Biol Chem. 2002;383:1107–1112. doi: 10.1515/BC.2002.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Devy L, Huang L, Naa L, Yanamandra N, Pieters H, Frans N, Chang E, Tao Q, Vanhove M, Lejeune A, et al. Selective inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-14 blocks tumor growth, invasion, and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2009;69:1517–1526. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dubin G, Stec-Niemczyk J, Kisielewska M, Pustelny K, Popowicz GM, Bista M, Kantyka T, Boulware KT, Stennicke HR, Czarna A, et al. Enzymatic activity of the Staphylococcus aureus SplB serine protease is induced by substrates containing the sequence Trp-Glu-Leu-Gln. J Mol Biol. 2008;379:343–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Folgueras A, Pendas AM, Sanchez LM, Lopez-Otin C. Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer: from new functions to improved inhibition strategies. Int J Dev Biol. 2004;48:411–424. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.041811af. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fujita M, Nakao Y, Matsunaga S, van Soest RW, Itoh Y, Seiki M, Fusetani N. Callysponginol sulfate A, an MT1-MMP inhibitor isolated from the marine sponge Callyspongia truncata. J Nat Prod. 2003;66:569–571. doi: 10.1021/np020572s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Garcia-Pozo L, Miquilena-Colina ME, Lozano-Rodriguez T, Garcia-Monzon C. Endoglin: structure, biological functions, and role in fibrogenesis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2008;100:355–360. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082008000600008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodison S, Urquidi V, Tarin D. CD44 cell adhesion molecules. Mol Pathol. 1999;52:189–196. doi: 10.1136/mp.52.4.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haas TL, Davis SJ, Madri JA. Three-dimensional Type I Collagen Lattices Induce Coordinate Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases MT1-MMP and MMP-2 in Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273:3604–3610. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.6.3604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Harris JL, Backes BJ, Leonetti F, Mahrus S, Ellman JA, Craik CS. Rapid and general profiling of protease specificity by using combinatorial fluorogenic substrate libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:7754–7759. doi: 10.1073/pnas.140132697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hashimoto Y, Kondo C, Kojima T, Nagata H, Moriyama A, Hayakawa T, Katunuma N. Significance of 32-kDa cathepsin L secreted from cancer cells. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2006;21:217–224. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2006.21.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Holmbeck K, B P, Caterina J, Yamada S, Kromer M, Kuznetsov SA, Mankani M, Robey PG, Poole AR, Pidouz I, Ward JM, Birkedal-Hansen H. MT1-MMP deficient mice develop dwarfism, osteopenia, arthritis, and connective tissue due to inadequate collagen turnover. Cell. 1999:81–92. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80064-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Holopainen JM, Moilanen JAO, Sorsa T, Kivela-Rajamaki M, Tervahartiala T, Vesaluoma MH, Tervo TMT. Activation of Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 by Membrane Type 1-MMP and Their Expression in Human Tears after Photorefractive Keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2550–2556. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hooper NM. Families of zinc metalloproteases. FEBS Letters. 1994;354:1. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(94)01079-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hornebeck W, Maquart FX. Proteolyzed matrix as a template for the regulation of tumor progression. Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapy. 2003;57:223. doi: 10.1016/s0753-3322(03)00049-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ito E, Yana I, Fujita C, Irifune A, Takeda M, Madachi A, Mori S, Hamada Y, kawaguchi N, Matsuura N. The role of MT2-MMP in cancer progression. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010;393:222–227. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.01.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Itoh Y, Seiki M. MT1-MMP: an enzyme with multidimensional regulation. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2004;29:285. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jiang T, Olson ES, Nguyen QT, Roy M, Jennings PA, Tsien RY. Tumor imaging by means of proteolytic activation of cell-penetrating peptides. PNAS. 2004;101:17867–17872. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408191101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kajita M, Itoh Y, Chiba T, Mori H, Okada A, Kinoh H, Seiki M. Membrane-type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase Cleaves CD44 and Promotes Cell Migration. J Cell Biol. 2001;153:893–904. doi: 10.1083/jcb.153.5.893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Karim AY, Kulczycka M, Kantyka T, Dubin G, Jabaiah A, Daugherty PS, Thogersen IB, Enghild JJ, Nguyen KA, Potempa J. A novel matrix metalloprotease-like enzyme (karilysin) of the periodontal pathogen Tannerella forsythia ATCC 43037. Biol Chem. 2010;391:105–117. doi: 10.1515/BC.2010.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kenn H, Paolo B, Susan Y, Henning BH. MT1-MMP: A tethered collagenase. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2004;200:11–19. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Knauper V, Cowell S, Smith B, Lopez-Otin C, O'Shea M, Morris H, Zardi L, Murphy G. The Role of the C-terminal Domain of Human Collagenase-3 (MMP-13) in the Activation of Procollagenase-3, Substrate Specificity, and Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase Interaction. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997;272:7608–7616. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.12.7608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Koo HM, Kim JH, Hwang IK, Lee SJ, Kim TH, Rhee KH, Lee ST. Refolding of the catalytic and hinge domains of human MT1-mMP expressed in Escherichia coli and its characterization. Mol Cells. 2002;13:118–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Krane SM, Byrne MH, Lemaitre V, Henriet P, Jeffrey JJ, Witter JP, Liu X, Wu H, Jaenisch R, Eeckhout Y. Different Collagenase Gene Products Have Different Roles in Degradation of Type I Collagen. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1996;271:28509–28515. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.45.28509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kridel SJ, Chen E, Kotra LP, Howard EW, Mobashery S, Smith JW. Substrate hydrolysis by matrix metalloproteinase-9. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:20572–20578. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100900200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kridel SJ, Sawai H, Ratnikov BI, Chen EI, Li W, Godzik A, Strongin AY, Smith JW. A Unique Substrate Binding Mode Discriminates Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase from Other Matrix Metalloproteinases. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:23788–23793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111574200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lampert K, Machein U, Machein MR, Conca W, Peter HH, Volk B. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors in human brain tumors. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:429–437. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65586-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Law B, Tung CH. Proteolysis: a biological process adapted in drug delivery, therapy, and imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2009;20:1683–1695. doi: 10.1021/bc800500a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee H, Overall CM, McCulloch CA, Sodek J. A Critical Role for the Membrane-type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase in Collagen Phagocytosis. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:4812–4826. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-06-0486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Malhotra S, Newman E, Eisenberg D, Scholes J, Wieczorek R, Mignatti P, Shamamian P. Increased membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase expression from adenoma to colon cancer: a possible mechanism of neoplastic progression. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:537–543. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6236-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nguyen AW, Daugherty PS. Evolutionary optimization of fluorescent proteins for intracellular FRET. Nat Biotech. 2005;23:355. doi: 10.1038/nbt1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Niyibizi C, Chan R, Wu JJ, Eyre D. A 92 kDa Gelatinase (MMP-9) Cleavage Site in Native Type V Collagen. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 1994;202:328. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ohkubo S, Miyadera K, Sugimoto Y, Matsuo K, Wierzba K, Yamada Y. Identification of substrate sequences for membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase using bacteriophage peptide display library. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;266:308–313. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Ohuchi E, Imai K, Fujii Y, Sato H, Seiki M, Okada Y. Membrane Type 1Matrix Metalloproteinase Digests Interstitial Collagens and Other Extracellular Matrix Macromolecules. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:2446–2451. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.4.2446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Okada A, Bellocq J, Rouyer N, Chenard M, Rio M, Chambon P, Basset P. Membrane-Type Matrix Metalloproteinase (MT-MMP) Gene is Expressed in Stromal Cells of Human Colon, Breast, and Head and Neck Carcinomas. PNAS. 1995;92:2730–2734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ouyang M, Lu S, Li XY, Xu J, Seong J, Giepmans BNG, Shyy JYJ, Weiss SJ, Wang Y. Visualization of Polarized Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in Live Cells by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Imaging. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:17740–17748. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709872200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Patterson ML, Atkinson SJ, Knäuper V, Murphy G. Specific collagenolysis by gelatinase A, MMP-2, is determined by the hemopexin domain and not the fibronectin-like domain. FEBS Letters. 2001;503:158. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02723-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Pei D, Weiss SJ. Transmembrane-deletion Mutants of the Membrane-type Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Process Progelatinase A and Express Intrinsic Matrix-degrading Activity. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:9135–9140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.15.9135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Platt MO, Ankeny RF, Jo H. Laminar Shear Stress Inhibits Cathepsin L Activity in Endothelial Cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1784–1790. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000227470.72109.2b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Remacle AG, C AV, Golubkov VS, Savinov AY, Rozanov DV, Strongin AY. O-Glycosylation Regulates Autolysis of Cellular Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) J Bio Chem. 2006;281:16897–16905. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600295200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Rice JJ, Schohn A, Bessette PH, Boulware KT, Daugherty PS. Bacterial display using circularly permuted outer membrane protein OmpX yields high affinity peptide ligands. Protein Sci. 2006;15:825–836. doi: 10.1110/ps.051897806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sabeh F, Li XY, Saunders TL, Rowe RG, Weiss SJ. Secreted versus membrane-anchored collagenases: Relative roles in fibroblast-dependent collagenolysis and invasion. J Biol Chem. 2009 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.002808. M109.002808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Sabeh F, Ota I, Holmbeck K, Birkedal-Hansen H, Soloway P, Balbin M, Lopez-Otin C, Shapiro S, Inada M, Krane S, et al. Tumor cell traffic through the extracellular matrix is controlled by the membrane-anchored collagenase MT1-MMP. J Cell Biol. 2004;167:769–781. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200408028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sato H, Takino T. Coordinate action of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MT1-MMP) and MMP-2 enhances pericellular proteolysis and invasion. Cancer Science. 2010;101:843–847. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01498.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Sato H, Takino T, Miyamori H. Roles of membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 in tumor invasion and metastasis. Cancer Science. 2005;96:212–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2005.00039.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Schilling O, Overall CM. Proteome-derived, database-searchable peptide libraries for identifying protease cleavage sites. Nat Biotech. 2008;26:685–694. doi: 10.1038/nbt1408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schneider EL, Craik CS. Positional scanning synthetic combinatorial libraries for substrate profiling. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;539:59–78. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-003-8_4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Seiki M. Membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase: a key enzyme for tumor invasion. Cancer Letters. 2003;194:1. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(02)00699-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Snoek-van Beurden PA, Von den Hoff JW. Zymographic techniques for the analysis of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Biotechniques. 2005;38:73–83. doi: 10.2144/05381RV01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Stamenkovic I. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumor invasion and metastasis. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2000;10:415. doi: 10.1006/scbi.2000.0379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Stec-Niemczyk J, Pustelny K, Kisielewska M, Bista M, Boulware KT, Stennicke HR, Thogersen IB, Daugherty PS, Enghild JJ, Baczynski K, et al. Structural and functional characterization of SplA, an exclusively specific protease of Staphylococcus aureus. Biochem J. 2009;419:555–564. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Stocker W, Grams F, Baumann U, Reinemer P, Gomis-Ruth FX, McKay DB, Bode W. The metzincins--topological and sequential relations between the astacins, adamalysins, serralysins, and matrixins (collagenases) define a superfamily of zinc-peptidases. Protein Sci. 1995;4:823–840. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560040502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tam EM, Morrison CJ, Wu YI, Stack MS, Overall CM. Membrane protease proteomics: Isotope-coded affinity tag MS identification of undescribed MT1-matrix metalloproteinase substrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:6917–6922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0305862101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Toth M, Hernandez-Barrantes S, Osenkowski P, Bernardo MM, Gervasi DC, Shimura Y, Meroueh O, Kotra LP, Galvez BG, Arroyo AG, et al. Complex Pattern of Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase Shedding. Regulation by Autocatalytic Cell Surface Inactivation of Active Enzyme. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:26340–26350. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200655200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Trochon V, Mabilat C, Bertrand P, Legrand Y, Smadja-Joffe F, Soria C, Delpech B, Lu H. Evidence of involvement of CD44 in endothelial cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis in vitro. Int J Cancer. 1996;66:664–668. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960529)66:5<664::AID-IJC14>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Turk BE, Huang LL, Piro ET, Cantley LC. Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries. Nat Biotech. 2001;19:661. doi: 10.1038/90273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Watkins GA, Jones EF, Scott Shell M, VanBrocklin HF, Pan MH, Hanrahan SM, Feng JJ, He J, Sounni NE, Dill KA, et al. Development of an optimized activatable MMP-14 targeted SPECT imaging probe. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 2009;17:653. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.11.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Watkinson A. Stratum corneum thiol protease (SCTP): a novel cysteine protease of late epidermal differentiation. Arch Dermatol Res. 1999;291:260–268. doi: 10.1007/s004030050406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Will H, Atkinson SJ, Butler GS, Smith B, Murphy G. The soluble catalytic domain of membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase cleaves the propeptide of progelatinase A and initiates autoproteolytic activation. Regulation by TIMP-2 and TIMP-3. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:17119–17123. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Wunder A, Tung CH, Muller-Ladner U, Weissleder R, Mahmood U. In vivo imaging of protease activity in arthritis: a novel approach for monitoring treatment response. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:2459–2465. doi: 10.1002/art.20379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Zhou Z, A SS, Soininen R, Cao R, Baaklini GY, Rauser RW, Wang J, Cao Y, Tryggvason L. Impaired endochondral ossification and angiogenesis in mice deficient in membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USa. 2000;11:4052–4057. doi: 10.1073/pnas.060037197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES