Skip to main content
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1995 Dec 11;23(23):4900–4906. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.23.4900

DNA binding properties of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DAT1 gene product.

B J Reardon 1, D Gordon 1, M J Ballard 1, E Winter 1
PMCID: PMC307481  PMID: 8532535

Abstract

The DAT1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a DNA binding protein (Dat1p) that specifically recognizes the minor groove of non-alternating oligo(A).oligo(T) tracts. Sequence-specific recognition requires arginine residues found within three perfectly repeated pentads (G-R-K-P-G) of the Dat1p DNA binding domain [Reardon, B. J., Winters, R. S., Gordon, D., and Winter, E. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 11327-1131]. This report describes a rapid and simple method for purifying the Dat1p DNA binding domain and the biochemical characterization of its interaction with oligo(A).oligo(T) tracts. Oligonucleotide binding experiments and the characterization of yeast genomic Dat1p binding sites show that Dat1p specifically binds to any 11 base sequence in which 10 bases conform to an oligo(A).oligo(T) tract. Binding studies of different sized Dat1p derivatives show that the Dat1p DNA binding domain can function as a monomer. Competition DNA binding assays using poly(I).poly(C), demonstrate that the minor groove oligo(A).oligo(T) constituents are not sufficient for high specificity DNA binding. These data constrain the possible models for Dat1p/oligo(A).oligo(T) complexes, suggest that the DNA binding domain is in an extended structure when complexed to its cognate DNA, and show that Dat1p binding sites are more prevalent than previously thought.

Full text

PDF
4900

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Botfield M. C., Jancso A., Weiss M. A. An invariant asparagine in the POU-specific homeodomain regulates the specificity of the Oct-2 POU motif. Biochemistry. 1994 Jul 5;33(26):8113–8121. doi: 10.1021/bi00192a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Churchill M. E., Suzuki M. 'SPKK' motifs prefer to bind to DNA at A/T-rich sites. EMBO J. 1989 Dec 20;8(13):4189–4195. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb08604.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Churchill M. E., Travers A. A. Protein motifs that recognize structural features of DNA. Trends Biochem Sci. 1991 Mar;16(3):92–97. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(91)90040-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coll M., Frederick C. A., Wang A. H., Rich A. A bifurcated hydrogen-bonded conformation in the d(A.T) base pairs of the DNA dodecamer d(CGCAAATTTGCG) and its complex with distamycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(23):8385–8389. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.23.8385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DiGabriele A. D., Sanderson M. R., Steitz T. A. Crystal lattice packing is important in determining the bend of a DNA dodecamer containing an adenine tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(6):1816–1820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Freemont P. S., Lane A. N., Sanderson M. R. Structural aspects of protein-DNA recognition. Biochem J. 1991 Aug 15;278(Pt 1):1–23. doi: 10.1042/bj2780001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gehring W. J., Affolter M., Bürglin T. Homeodomain proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:487–526. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.002415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gehring W. J., Qian Y. Q., Billeter M., Furukubo-Tokunaga K., Schier A. F., Resendez-Perez D., Affolter M., Otting G., Wüthrich K. Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):211–223. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90292-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iyer V., Struhl K. Poly(dA:dT), a ubiquitous promoter element that stimulates transcription via its intrinsic DNA structure. EMBO J. 1995 Jun 1;14(11):2570–2579. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07255.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Karlin S., Blaisdell B. E., Sapolsky R. J., Cardon L., Burge C. Assessments of DNA inhomogeneities in yeast chromosome III. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993 Feb 11;21(3):703–711. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.3.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kissinger C. R., Liu B. S., Martin-Blanco E., Kornberg T. B., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 A resolution: a framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1990 Nov 2;63(3):579–590. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90453-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kunkel G. R., Martinson H. G. Nucleosomes will not form on double-stranded RNa or over poly(dA).poly(dT) tracts in recombinant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Dec 21;9(24):6869–6888. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.24.6869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lang D., Stamminger T. Minor groove contacts are essential for an interaction of the human cytomegalovirus IE2 protein with its DNA target. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Aug 25;22(16):3331–3338. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.16.3331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Latchman D. S. Eukaryotic transcription factors. Biochem J. 1990 Sep 1;270(2):281–289. doi: 10.1042/bj2700281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Laughon A. DNA binding specificity of homeodomains. Biochemistry. 1991 Dec 3;30(48):11357–11367. doi: 10.1021/bi00112a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nelson H. C., Finch J. T., Luisi B. F., Klug A. The structure of an oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications. Nature. 1987 Nov 19;330(6145):221–226. doi: 10.1038/330221a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. Annu Rev Biochem. 1992;61:1053–1095. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.005201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peck L. J., Wang J. C. Sequence dependence of the helical repeat of DNA in solution. Nature. 1981 Jul 23;292(5821):375–378. doi: 10.1038/292375a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Phillips S. E. The beta-ribbon DNA recognition motif. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1994;23:671–701. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.23.060194.003323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Reardon B. J., Winters R. S., Gordon D., Winter E. A peptide motif that recognizes A.T tracts in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Dec 1;90(23):11327–11331. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.23.11327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reeves R., Nissen M. S. The A.T-DNA-binding domain of mammalian high mobility group I chromosomal proteins. A novel peptide motif for recognizing DNA structure. J Biol Chem. 1990 May 25;265(15):8573–8582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schleif R. DNA binding by proteins. Science. 1988 Sep 2;241(4870):1182–1187. doi: 10.1126/science.2842864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Solomon M. J., Strauss F., Varshavsky A. A mammalian high mobility group protein recognizes any stretch of six A.T base pairs in duplex DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Mar;83(5):1276–1280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.5.1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Starr D. B., Hawley D. K. TFIID binds in the minor groove of the TATA box. Cell. 1991 Dec 20;67(6):1231–1240. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90299-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Struhl K. Helix-turn-helix, zinc-finger, and leucine-zipper motifs for eukaryotic transcriptional regulatory proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1989 Apr;14(4):137–140. doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(89)90145-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Struhl K. Naturally occurring poly(dA-dT) sequences are upstream promoter elements for constitutive transcription in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985 Dec;82(24):8419–8423. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.24.8419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Winter E., Varshavsky A. A DNA binding protein that recognizes oligo(dA).oligo(dT) tracts. EMBO J. 1989 Jun;8(6):1867–1877. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1989.tb03583.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wolberger C., Vershon A. K., Liu B., Johnson A. D., Pabo C. O. Crystal structure of a MAT alpha 2 homeodomain-operator complex suggests a general model for homeodomain-DNA interactions. Cell. 1991 Nov 1;67(3):517–528. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90526-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES