Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: West Indian Med J. 2010 Oct;59(5):549–554.

Factors associated with incomplete childhood immunization among residents of St. Mary parish of Jamaica

Faisal Shuaib 1, Denise Kimbrough 1, Michele Roofe 2, G McGwin Jr 1, Pauline Jolly 1
PMCID: PMC3075412  NIHMSID: NIHMS253764  PMID: 21473405

Abstract

Aim

To investigate factors associated with caregiver failure to complete immunizations for their children in the parish of St. Mary, Jamaica.

Methods

A case-control study was conducted with 50 cases defined as caregivers who failed to immunize their children and 179 controls defined as caregivers of children who were properly immunized. The cases were caregivers of children who were randomly selected from clinic records of children who failed to complete their immunization within the study period. Contrarily, controls were caregivers of children who were identified to have completed their immunization from a similar list. Cases and controls were visited at home and interviewed using a validated questionnaire. Cases and controls were compared in terms of socio-demographic, economic and other variables.

Results

Participants with less than secondary school education were more likely to be non-compliant (odds ratio [OR], 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–5.97), while participants who were aware of legislation against non-compliance with immunization (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17–0.69) were less likely to fail to immunize their children.

Conclusion

Policy makers and program managers need to use established educational and communication channels to increase awareness about immunization especially among families with lower educational levels in the parish.

Keywords: Immunization, Defaulting, Determinants. Jamaica

Introduction

Immunization against childhood diseases such as tuberculosis, poliomyelitis, measles, diphtheria, whooping cough and tetanus reduce childhood morbidity and mortality.(1) Studies have shown that the cost to treat a vaccine preventable disease may be up to 30-times more than the cost of the vaccine.(2) Children who contract these preventable diseases usually suffer from impaired physical growth, cognitive development, emotional development, and social skills.(3)

Immunization in Jamaica is compulsory; it is a pre-requisite for school enrollment and defaulters can be punished under the law.(4) In spite of this, the immunization coverage rates are suboptimal. In 2007, the Jamaican Ministry of Health reported that only 76% of children aged 12 to 23 months of age had received all their recommended immunizations.(5) These low rates of coverage create a potential for outbreak of vaccine preventable diseases. In 2001 the Jamaican Ministry of health reported an outbreak of 11 cases of polio, 7 cases of rubella, 1 case of diphtheria, 7 cases of whooping cough, 111 cases of tuberculosis and 9 cases of tetanus.(6) Additionally, incomplete immunizations serve as an indicator of poor access to other preventive and primary health care programs.(7)

Few studies have been conducted in Jamaica to investigate why some care givers do not avail themselves of this cost effective means of disease prevention. One study (8) found that low income and single parenthood reduce the likelihood of children being fully immunized. Similar studies in Nigeria and Niger showed that, poor immunization was attributable to low socioeconomic status and low maternal education (52%).(9) Jamaica on the other hand, has a high female literacy rate of 92% and only 14% of the populace lives below the poverty line.(10) The present study was conducted in the Northeastern parish of St. Mary, Jamaica. We hypothesized that incomplete immunizations in this parish would be associated with socio-demographic and economic factors such as maternal age, marital status, educational level, employment status of mother and family size. Findings from this study can guide program managers on how to deploy scarce resources to efficiently improve immunization coverage and consequently, reduce the incidence of vaccine preventable diseases in St. Mary and probably other parishes in Jamaica with similar challenges.

Methods

Study setting

The parish of St. Mary is located in the Northeastern region of Jamaica; with an area of 610 square kilometers, it is one of the smallest of the 14 parishes. It has a population of 113,000 according to a 2001 census. Agriculture, mainly sugarcane cultivation, is the predominant means of livelihood for residents.(11) There are 29 health clinics in the parish which are manned by a mix of doctors, nurses or community health aides depending on the type of facility. The study was conducted between June and August of 2008. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Alabama at Birmingham, the Advisory Panel of Ethics and Medico-Legal Affairs in the Jamaican Ministry of Health, and the North eastern Regional Health Authority approved the study protocol prior to its implementation.

Study Design and Participants

This was an unmatched case-control study. Recruitment of study participants involved randomly choosing children from a list of all children who did not show up to complete their immunizations (defaulters). The full address of these caregivers were pulled up from the records and visited by interviewers. As part of the interview, information on the immunization status of eligible children was obtained from the caregivers and subsequently verified from childhood immunization cards maintained by the parents/guardians. Once immunization status was verified, cases were defined as parents or guardians who reside in the Parish of St. Mary but failed to have their children fully immunized in accordance with the immunization schedule of the Jamaican Ministry of Health between January 2007 and March 2008. For the purposes of this study a parent or guardian was defined as any respondent who has been involved in the child’s care and immunization activities for at least half of the study period. In defining whether a caregiver was a case or not, only the immunization status of the age (≤ 2 years) eligible child was considered. Other children in the household who were beyond this age of eligibility were not considered irrespective of their immunization status. Controls were defined as parents or guardians who reside in St. Mary parish but took their eligible children (aged ≤ 2 years) to the various clinics and completed their scheduled immunization. The list of these controls was derived from immunization records kept by the various clinics.

Out of a total of 285 caregivers approached to participate in the study; 10 (3.6%) controls and 13 (4.6%) cases declined to take part in the study. There were a total of 195 cases and 50 controls. While 179 (91.8%) of the controls were females, all cases were females. Sixteen males, who were all controls, were excluded from the analysis because their socio-economic characteristics were substantially different from the mostly female participants.

Study instrument and data collection

Potential study participants were given an explanation of the purpose of the study and asked if they would like to participate. They were assured of confidentiality. Upon agreement, the informed consent form was described and potential participants were asked to read the consent form. Interviewers were health workers from the parish and students trained in protocol development and questionnaire administration. Prior to taking the immunization history, interviewers did not know if the participants being interviewed were cases or controls. The questionnaire was designed and adapted from the validated Parental Knowledge and Experiences module which was used in the National Immunization Survey of July 2001 to December 2002. The questions were framed to obtain information regarding the age of caregiver, marital status, family size, employment status and educational level attained. Other information was elicited including: the number of children in the household, the relationship of care giver to the child, who financially takes care of the child, if there are religious reasons pertinent in the decision to avoid immunization and if the care giver was aware that they could be prosecuted for failure to have the child vaccinated.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using SAS software version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Cases and controls were compared with respect to socio-demographic characteristics. Odds ratios (ORs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between non-completion of immunizations and socio-demographic characteristics were estimated by logistic regression. For adjusted models, a backward-selection process was performed with all demographic variables and reasons for non-completion of immunization with a p-value of 0.1 or less included in the final model. In the final adjusted model, the determination of which variables should be retained as confounders was based on the change-in-estimate criteria using a value 10%.(12)

Results

There was no significant difference between the mean age for the cases and that of the controls (Table 1). The distribution of participants across age groups was similar with most participants aged between 20 and 29 years. For both groups, caregivers were mostly unemployed and this did not differ between the groups. Most participants reported they had either attended some secondary school or vocational training; though a greater percentage of cases had less education than the controls. Cases were also more likely to report being single, unemployed, and having no religious affiliation.

Table 1.

Selected characteristics of the 229 study participants, St Mary, Jamaica

Characteristic Cases n=50 Controls n=179
No. (%) No. (%)
Gender
 Female 50 100 179 100
Mean age (years)±SD 28±9.8 29±10.3
Age group (years)
 <20 6 12.0 17 9.5
 20–24 13 26.0 49 27.4
 25–29 16 32.0 49 27.4
 30–34 6 12.0 21 11.7
 35–39 5 10.0 17 9.5
 40 and over 4 8.0 26 14.5
Educational level
Some primary or completed primary 13 26.0 22 12.3
Some secondary, some vocational or completed vocational 22 44.0 99 55.3
Completed Secondary 13 26.0 40 22.4
Some college or completed college 2 4.0 18 10.0
Marital Status
Single 22 44.0 78 43.8
Visiting, divorced or widowed 4 8.0 25 14.0
Living together 17 34.0 46 25.8
Married 7 14.0 29 16.3
Employment type
Unemployed 34 68.0 122 69.3
Employed 16 32.0 54 30.7
Aware of liability to prosecution
Yes 14 28 95 53.1
No 36 72 84 46.9
Religion
Have religious affiliation* 22 44.0 108 60.3
Have no religious affiliation 28 56.0 71 39.7

Key:

*

Participants who profess a religious affiliation categorized into Catholicism, Apostolicism, Baptist, Anglican, Pentecostal, 7-day Adventist, and Methodist. The 7-day Adventist group who tend to reject immunization constituted 8.7% of the cases (not shown).

Older caregivers (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.11–1.78) and those living with a partner (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.18–1.80) were less likely to fail to immunize their children though neither of these associations were statistically significant (Table 2). It was also observed that having some college education or completing college education was associated with a reduced odds of defaulting compared to respondents who had completed secondary education (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.11–2.31). On the contrary, caregivers who attained an educational qualification equivalent to some primary or completed primary education had almost three-fold odds of defaulting on immunization (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.16–6.08) compared to those who completed secondary education. The odds of defaulting were higher with a family size of at least 6 members (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.64–5.66). Participants who did not take their children for immunizations were 66% less likely to be aware that failure to take children for immunization was against the law and liable to prosecution (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.17–0.68). It is also noteworthy that, there was a protective association against non-compliance among those who professed a religious affiliation (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27–0.97).

Table 2.

Association between some independent variables and failure to immunize eligible children in St. Mary Parish, Jamaica

Variable Age group (years) Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)α Adjusted OR (95% CI)β
<20 Ref Ref -
20–24 0.75 (0.25–2.29) 0.81 (0.26–2.57)
25–29 0.93 ( 0.31–2.75) 0.31 (0.37–3.50)
30–34 0.81 (0.22–2.97) 0.99 (0.25–3.86)
35–39 0.83 ( 0.21–3.26) 0.95 (0.23–3.98)
≥40 0.44 (0.11–1.78) 0.60 (0.14–2.62)
Marital status
Single Ref Ref -
Visiting, divorced or widowed 0.86 (0.59–5.90) 1.08 (0.38–3.03)
Living together 0.57 (0.18–1.804) 0.66 (0.19–2.19)
Married 1.31 (0.63–2.72) 1.24 (0.58–2.68)
Employment type
Unemployed Ref Ref
Employed 1.06 (0.54–2.09) 1.14 (0.56–2.32)
Educational level
Completed secondary Ref Ref Ref
Some primary or completed primary 2.66 (1.16–6.08) 2.76 (1.14–6.72) 2.51 (1.06–5.97)
Some secondary, some vocational or completed vocational 1.46 (0.67–3.18) 1.51 (0.68–3.35) 1.42 (0.64–3.17)
Some college or completed college 0.50 (0.11–2.31) 0.60 (0.13–2.86) 0.58 (0.12–2.78)
Family size
<3 Ref Ref -
3–5 0.96 (0.33–2.79) 1.01 (0.33–3.11)
≥6 1.89 (0.64–5.66) 2.17 (0.69–6.89)
Aware of liability to prosecution
Yes vs. No 0.34 (0.17–0.68) 0.34 (0.17–0.67) 0.35 (0.17–0.69)
Have religious affiliation
Yes vs. No 0.52 (0.27–0.97) 0.56 (0.29–1.06) 0.62 (0.32–1.21)

Key: OR=Odds ratio; CI=Confidence interval, Ref=Reference group,

α

Full model with employment type, marital status, educational status, family size and religious affiliation,

β

Model with variables where P ≤ 0.1

Figures in bold are significant.

In the full model, the association between having some primary/completing primary education and knowledge about liability to prosecution retained their statistical significance after adjusting for other variables.

In the final model only having some primary/completing primary education (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.06–5.97) and awareness about liability to prosecution (OR, 0.35; CI, 0.17–0.69) were significantly associated with compliance with the immunization schedule.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate that completing secondary school, or knowing that it is against the law to default on immunization, were significantly associated with better compliance with immunization schedules.

While it is expected that having higher education may confer greater awareness about the risks of childhood diseases, the high literacy rate among Jamaican women may indicate that cases do not have the same type of access to information on immunization as the controls even if they live in the same neighborhood. Few studies to date have shown that having more than secondary education predicts completion of immunization. Even so, the association was moderate (OR, 1.5).(8) Those that have less education may therefore benefit from any programs (e.g. information, education and communication strategies) directed at increasing their knowledge about immunization services and consequently disabuse their minds of any negative feelings that may exist about immunization.

Knowledge that prosecution may result, from failure to immunize children, appears to be a deterrent against being a defaulter. This stands to reason and makes a case for providing further information on the statutory provisions on immunization to residents of St. Mary. To our knowledge, this is the first study which has demonstrated an association between mandatory legislation on immunization and completion of immunization schedule for children. However, it is also possible that caregivers became aware of the legislation only after attending the clinics to immunize their children. This scenario is plausible given that health education talks shared in the clinic may emphasize the need for immunizations and the repercussions of non-compliance. Non-statistically significant associations which reduced the odds of non-compliance with immunization were observed with smaller family size, having a religious affiliation, care givers who are at least 40 years old, and couples who live together. It is well documented that larger family size is associated with dilution of resources and hence children are not availed of the necessary health care including access to immunization services.(8)

Some religious bodies are known to discourage their members from accepting immunization while experiences with adverse side effects have been known to promote refusal of immunizations by certain groups. (13, 14) Belonging to a religious denomination or expressing religious affiliation was found to be protective against non-compliance with immunization. Though not statistically significant in our study after adjusting for covariates, this finding is in consonance with studies in other parts of the world where religion was significantly associated with the reduced risk of non-immunization.(15) Differences in results obtained by different investigators who looked at the influence of religion on immunization may be due to differences in socio-cultural antecedents and theological persuasions between populations involved in the studies.

Our inability to detect some significant associations that have been reported in similar studies could be attributed to our relatively small sample size. Consequently, these results must be interpreted in light of several potential limitations, the most apparent of which is our study’s small sample size. This provided limited statistical power to detect associations that were small and moderate in magnitude and yielded estimates that lacked precision.

Other potential limitations are that, not all eligible cases or controls took part in the study. Out of a total of 263 parents approached to enroll in the study, 10 (3.8%) controls and 8 (3.0%) cases declined to take part in the study. There were no differences with respect to age, sex or race of those that opted not to enroll in the study, which leads us to believe that selection bias is an unlikely explanation for the observed results. We excluded all sixteen males from the study.

Results of analysis with and without this group were not meaningfully different. However, the observed results should only be taken to refer to females.

To default in immunization is a civil offense in Jamaica. In order to circumvent misleading information or socially desirable answers provided by caregivers (16), we ensured the accuracy of immunization status of the children by cross checking their immunization cards.

In conclusion, the results of this study provide an opportunity for policy makers in St. Mary to evaluate on-going programs, identify gaps, and step up awareness campaigns using known and effective communication channels to convey messages to communities with a large number of at-risk families. The apparent deterrent effect of the law against immunization can be explored to promote compliance among delinquent caregivers. This could go a long way in protecting unimmunized children from contracting infectious diseases or becoming a nidus from which an epidemic flourishes.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment of Research Support

We thank the health officials of the North eastern Regional Health Authority for their kind assistance in conducting the project and the parents who participated. This research was supported by Grant #T37 MD001448 from the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institute of Health, USA and the Ministry of Health, Jamaica. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References

  • 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Global immunizations and Vaccinations. [Electronic] Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A: 2008. [updated 2008 December 4, 2008; cited 2009 March 2, 2009]; Web page]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/global/default.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National infant immunization week. Information and organization handbook. Atlanata: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Belli PC, Bustereo F, Preker A. Investing in children’s health: what are the economic benefits? Bulletin of the World Health Organization [Bulletin] 2005;83(10):777–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Information service J. Immunization is the Law - Chief Medical Officer of Health Reminds. [Electronic] Kingston: Information service, Jamaica; 2009. [updated 2009 May 28, 2008; cited 2009 March 04, 2009]; Available from: http://jis.gov.jm/health/html/20080528t110000-0500_15387_jis_immunization_is_the_law___chief_medical_officer_of_health_reminds.asp. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ministry of Health Annual report J. Ministry of health annual report 2008. Kingston: Ministry of Health; 2008. Contract No.: Document Number|. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ministry of Health Annual report J. Annual Health report. Kingston: Ministry of Health and Environment, Jamaica; 2001. Contract No.: Document Number|. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jeanne M, Santoli LE, Barker BH, Lyons NB, Gandhi CP, Lance ER. Health department clinics as pediatric immunization providers: A national survey. American Journal of Preventive medicine. 2001;20(4):266–71. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(01)00299-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bronte-Tinkew J, Dejong GF. Do household structure and household economic resources predict childhood immunization? Evidence from Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago. Population Research and Policy Review. 2005;24(27):27–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anastasia J, Gage A, Sommerfelt E, Anrea LP. Household structure and childhood immunization in Niger and Nigeria. Demography. 1997;34(2):295–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.NationMaster.com. Population below poverty line. NationMaster.com. 2008 [updated 2008 December 18, 2008; cited 2009 March 1, 2009]; Available from: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco_pop_bel_pov_lin-economy-population-below-poverty-line.
  • 11.U.S. Department of State. Jamaica country specific information. Washington DC: U.S Department of State; 2009. [updated 2009 November 25, 2008; cited 2009 March 3, 2009]; Available from: http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1147.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maldonado G, Greenland S. Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;138(11):923–36. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kulig JC, Meyer CJ, Hill SA, Handley CE. Refusals and delay of immunization within southwest Alberta. Understanding alternative beliefs and religious perspectives. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2002;93( 2):109. doi: 10.1007/BF03404549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Henderson L, Millett C, Thorogood N. Perceptions of childhood immunization in a minority community: qualitative study. J R Soc Med. 2008;101(5):244–51. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.070363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Antai D. Faith and child survival: the role of religion in childhood immunization in Nigeria. J Biosoc Sci. 2009;41(1):57–76. doi: 10.1017/S0021932008002861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Schulz K, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995;273(5):408–12. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES