Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 13.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Oct 27;31(12):1290–1293. doi: 10.1086/657332

Risk of Postdischarge Infection with Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus after Initial Infection or Colonization

Rupak Datta 1, Susan S Huang 1
PMCID: PMC3075426  NIHMSID: NIHMS283157  PMID: 20979493

Abstract

Postdischarge risks of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infection among carriers are unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 199 patients newly detected as VRE carriers. Fifteen patients (8%) developed 27 VRE infections in the 18 months after detection. Among 10 postdischarge infections, 2 involved bacteremia and 3 resulted in readmission.


As hospital length of stay shortens, it is increasingly important to evaluate postdischarge risks of healthcare-associated infection. Of the estimated 35 million hospital discharges in the United States in 2006, 58% involved hospitalizations of 3 days or less.1 Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) is an important source of healthcare-associated infections and causes substantial morbidity and mortality among immunosuppressed patients.25 Because VRE carriage is often prolonged,6,7 studies assessing postdischarge risks of VRE infection are needed. We sought to assess the risk of VRE infection among all newly detected carriers both during hospitalization in and after discharge from an academic medical center.

METHODS

We identified a retrospective cohort of all adult patients from a 750-bed academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts, who were newly detected with VRE colonization or infection during the period from September 1, 2003, through December 31, 2004. Using this cohort, we assessed the risk of VRE infection within 18 months after initial detection using in-patient and outpatient medical records at the same institution. Because rectal sample screening for VRE was performed at admission and weekly in all intensive care units (ICUs) using conventional cultures,8 all VRE carriers newly detected by means of ICU screening cultures were evaluated as a subgroup. The Brigham and Women’s Hospital institutional review board approved this study.

Demographic and antibiotic use data were obtained for all patients. Comorbidities were identified with use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes recorded during the year prior to and during the hospitalization in which VRE carriage was newly detected. All comorbidities were verified by means of medical record review. Malignancies were recorded only if treatment was received during the preceding year. Antibiotic administration was recorded from the time of detection to the time of infection, death, or the end of follow-up and grouped into the following classes: broad-spectrum penicillins, third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, macrolides, and vancomycin. We also assessed whether patients were admitted to an ICU during the hospitalization in which VRE carriage was newly detected and whether patients underwent surgery during the prior 6 months. For patients whose initial positive culture results were detected during hospitalization, we assessed preadmission location, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition.

Medical records were reviewed to identify the body site that had been colonized or infected when the initial VRE-positive culture sample was obtained and whether the detection represented colonization or infection on the basis of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria.9 All VRE isolates found within 18 months after initial detection were evaluated for evidence of discrete infection. Two trained reviewers separately verified whether infections represented distinct and unrelated events. Subsequent infections were described according to the infection site and days since initial detection.

We determined the proportion of patients who subsequently developed VRE infection within 18 months after initial detection of colonization or infection for all patients and for the subgroup of ICU patients newly detected as carriers by means of screening cultures. The proportion of patients who died within 18 months after detection, from all causes and from VRE, was also assessed. Death due to VRE was defined as VRE infection or bacteremia within 7 days of death and no other cause of death.

Potential predictors of VRE infection were assessed using a matched case-control design in which each VRE carrier who subsequently experienced infection was randomly matched to 5 VRE carriers who did not subsequently experience infection. Among control patients, the duration of follow-up was required to be at least as long as the time to infection for the matched case patients. Antibiotic receipt was evaluated for the month prior to infection among case patients and for the corresponding month since time of detection among matched control patients. Potential predictors that yielded P < .10 with the univariate Fisher exact test were entered into multivariate models in which predictors were retained at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Among 56,317 hospital admissions, 199 patients (0.4%) were newly detected with VRE colonization or infection. Of these patients, 99 were newly detected as carriers by means of ICU screening cultures (1% of 10,151 ICU admissions). Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of patients at the time of detection was 65 years. Among in-patients, the median hospital length of stay at the time of detection was 19 days (range, 1–139 days), although 52 (28%) of 187 inpatients had a VRE-positive culture result within 2 calendar days after admission. Among the 100 carriers detected with clinical cultures, 22 (22%) were colonized and 78 (78%) were infected at the time of detection.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of Patients Newly Detected as Carrying Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE)

Characteristic Proportion (%) of patients
P
Total Detected with clinical culture Detected with ICU screening culture
Positive culture result 199/199 (100) 100/100 (100) 99/99 (100)
Male sex 119/199 (60) 55/100 (55) 64/99 (65) .17
Race .16
 White 160/199 (80) 82/100 (82) 78/99 (79)
 Black 16/199 (8) 10/100 (10) 6/99 (6)
 Other or unknown 23/199 (12) 8/100 (8) 15/99 (15)
Hospitalized at time of VRE detection 187/199 (94) 88/100 (88) 99/99 (100) <.001
 Preadmission locationa .12
  Home 86/187 (46) 45/88 (51) 41/99 (41)
  Other hospital 65/187 (35) 25/88 (28) 40/99 (40)
  Rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility 36/187 (19) 18/88 (20) 18/99 (18)
 Discharge dispositiona .03
  Home 58/187 (31) 36/88 (41) 22/99 (22)
  Other hospital 9/187 (5) 1/88 (1) 8/99 (8)
  Rehabilitation or skilled nursing facility 74/187 (40) 32/88 (36) 42/99 (42)
  Deceased 46/187 (25) 19/88 (22) 27/99 (27)
Index culture species .06
Enterococcus faecium 181/199 (91) 90/100 (90) 91/99 (92)
Enterococcus faecalis 13/199 (7) 5/100 (5) 8/99 (8)
 Other Enterococcus species 5/199 (3) 5/100 (5) 0/99 (0)
Immunosuppression
 Solid cancer 41/199 (21) 20/100 (20) 21/99 (21) .83
 Hematologic malignancy 32/199 (16) 22/100 (22) 10/99 (10) .02
 Receipt of solid-organ transplant 30/199 (15) 23/100 (23) 7/99 (7) .002
Chronic disease
 Diabetes mellitus 50/199 (25) 26/100 (26) 24/99 (24) .78
 End-stage renal disease 30/199 (15) 15/100 (15) 15/99 (15) .98
 End-stage liver disease 7/199 (4) 6/100 (6) 1/99 (1) .06
Other comorbidities
 ICU staya 136/187 (73) 37/88 (42) 99/99 (100) <.001
 Surgery during prior 6 months 117/199 (59) 53/100 (53) 64/99 (65) .10

NOTE. ICU, intensive care unit.

a

During the hospitalization in which the patient was newly detected as a VRE carrier.

Fifteen patients (8%) subsequently developed 27 discrete and unrelated VRE infections during the 18 months after detection. The proportion of patients who developed infection was similar among patients whose carriage was detected with ICU screening cultures (8 [8%] of 99) and patients whose carriage was detected with clinical cultures (7 [7%] of 100). The most common infections were urinary tract (10 [37%] of 27), primary bloodstream (7 [26%] of 27), soft-tissue (5 [19%] of 27), and gastrointestinal (2 [7%] of 27) infections. Eight infections (30%) involved bacteremia. More than one-third (10 [37%] of 27) of VRE infections developed after discharge, with 2 (20%) involving bacteremia and 3 (30%) requiring rehospitalization. Most patients (14 [93%] of 15) developed infection at a site distinct from the site of detection. VRE infections occurred a median of 52 days (range, 2–525 days) after detection of VRE carriage.

Within 18 months after VRE detection, 89 (45%) of 199 patients experienced 217 readmissions. One hundred four patients (52%) died a median of 31 days after detection (range, 1–405 days). Of the 104 deaths, 88 (85%), 13 (13%), and 3 (3%) occurred during the first, second, and third 6-month periods after detection, respectively. One death was due to VRE.

The results of univariate testing are shown in Table 2. In multivariate analysis, only hematologic malignancy was significantly associated with VRE infection (odds ratio, 9.1 [95% confidence interval, 1.4–60.4]; P = .02).

TABLE 2.

Univariate Association with Subsequent Infection among Patients Newly Detected as Carrying Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus (VRE)

Variable No. (%) of VRE carriers
P
Control patients without infection (n = 75) Case patients who developed infection (n = 15)
Demographic characteristics
 Male sex 38 (51) 12 (80) .05
 Age .52
  18–44 years 4 (5) 3 (20)
  45–54 years 11 (15) 1 (7)
  15–64 years 13 (17) 2 (13)
  65–74 years 15 (20) 4 (27)
  75–84 years 23 (31) 4 (27)
  ≥85 years 9 (12) 1 (7)
 White race 56 (75) 13 (87) .51
 Preadmission locationa .71
  Home 34 (45) 7 (47)
  Other hospital 19 (25) 6 (40)
  Rehabilitation center 8 (11) 1 (7)
  Skilled nursing facility 7 (9) 1 (7)
  Outpatient clinic 7 (9) 0 (0)
Detected with ICU surveillance culture 36 (48) 8 (53) .78
Immunosuppression
 Solid cancer 18 (24) 2 (13) .51
 Hematologic malignancy 2 (3) 3 (20) .03
 Receipt of solid-organ transplant 8 (11) 3 (20) .38
Chronic disease
 Diabetes mellitus 20 (27) 6 (40) .35
 End-stage renal disease 11 (15) 2 (13) >.99
 End-stage liver disease 3 (4) 0 (0) >.99
Other comorbidities
 ICU staya 46 (61) 12 (80) .24
 Surgery during prior 6 months 43 (57) 9 (60) >.99
Antibiotic use
 Broad-spectrum penicillins 12 (16) 0 (0) .21
 Third-generation cephalosporins 12 (16) 2 (13) >.99
 Fluoroquinolones 22 (29) 1 (7) .10
 Carbapenems 5 (7) 1 (7) >.99
 Aminoglycosides 9 (12) 0 (0) .35
 Macrolides 1 (5) 0 (0) >.99
 Vancomycin 30 (40) 3 (20) .24

NOTE. ICU, intensive care unit.

a

During the hospitalization in which the patient was newly detected as a VRE carrier.

DISCUSSION

Among studies evaluating the risk of VRE infection among hospitalized carriers, none have evaluated postdischarge risks of infection. We conducted a hospital-wide study of newly detected VRE carriers and assessed subsequently occurring disease over 18 months. Among all hospitalized patients, new VRE detection was rare, even with an active ICU screening program.

Overall, we observed an 8% risk of infection within 18 months after detection. The median time from detection to infection was 52 days, with more than one-third of infections occurring after discharge. Although the risk of later infection was relatively low, the risk of bacteremia, when infection occurred, was high (30%).

Similar to prior reports, our findings show that hematologic malignancy is a risk factor for VRE infection.10 Our results also confirm that VRE carriage is commonly seen among severely ill patients. Among newly detected carriers, 52% died within 18 months. Moreover, the median time to death was shorter than the median time to infection. Thus, it is possible that the risk of infection may actually be higher in a less critically ill population.

This study has several limitations. First, our comparisons are limited because of a relatively small sample size. In addition, our findings may be an underestimate, because we could not account for infections that occurred at other medical facilities. Nevertheless, this study is one of the largest to investigate VRE carriers identified across an entire hospital population. Although numerous studies of VRE colonization have been performed, studies of VRE infection have been relatively small and limited to specialized subpopulations.3,5

We also note that although patients are described as “newly detected,” many newly detected carriers may actually be prevalent carriers, because VRE carriage is often prolonged.7,8 In our study, 28% of inpatients with newly detected VRE carriage had a VRE-positive culture result within 2 days after admission, which suggests that some cases may not represent new acquisition. In addition, because strain typing was not performed, it is unknown whether subsequent infections were due to the same strain as the index infection or colonization event.

In summary, this study indicates that postdischarge VRE infection among newly detected carriers is not uncommon. Across a large academic medical center, although VRE was newly detected in only 0.4% of patients, newly detected carriage conferred an 8% risk of subsequent infection during the following 18 months. Importantly, more than one-third of VRE infections occurred after discharge. These postdischarge infections were often severe, with 20% involving bacteremia and 30% resulting in readmission. Future studies assessing healthcare-associated morbidity due to VRE should consider evaluating postdischarge risks of infection.

Acknowledgments

Financial support. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC Prevention Epicenters Program, grant UR8/CCU115079) and the National Institutes of Health (grant K23AI64161).

Footnotes

Presented in part: 18th Annual Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Orlando, Florida; April 5–8, 2008; abstract 279.

Potential conflicts of interest. All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

  • 1.DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. National Health Statistics Report, No. 5: 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [Accessed October 19, 2010]. website. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr005.pdf. Published July 30, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Patel R. Clinical impact of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51(suppl 3):iii13–iii21. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zaas AK, Song X, Tucker P, Perl TM. Risk factors for development of vancomycin-resistant enteroccocal bloodstream infection in patients with cancer who are colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;35:1139–1146. doi: 10.1086/342904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Edmond MB, Ober JF, Weinbaum DL, Pfaller MA, Hwang T, Sanford MD, Wenzel RP. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: risk factors for infection. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:1126–1133. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.5.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuehnert MJ, Jernigan JA, Pullen AL, Rimland D, Jarvis WR. Association between mucositis severity and vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infection in hospitalized cancer patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:660–663. doi: 10.1086/501561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Byers KE, Anglim AM, Anneski CJ, Farr BM. Duration of colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23:207–211. doi: 10.1086/502036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Montecalvo MA, de Lencastre H, Carraher M, et al. Natural history of colonization with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1995;16:680–685. doi: 10.1086/647041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Seventeenth Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2007. CLSI document M100-S17. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Horan TC, Gaynes RP. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. In: Mayhall CG, editor. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. 3. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. pp. 1659–1702. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hayden MK. Insights into the epidemiology and control of infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:1058–1065. doi: 10.1086/318126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES