Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Mar;9(3):603–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04161.x

Effect of the VWF promoter (GT)n repeat and SNP c.-2527G>A on circulating VWF levels under normal conditions

N HICKSON *, D HAMPSHIRE *, G CASTAMAN , J EIKENBOOM , F RODEGHIERO , I PEAKE *, A GOODEVE *, ON BEHALF OF THE MCMDM-1VWD AND ZPMCB-VWD STUDY GROUPS
PMCID: PMC3076607  NIHMSID: NIHMS257195  PMID: 21143374

Circulating von Willebrand factor (VWF) protein levels in plasma (VWF:Ag) of healthy individuals can be affected by a number of factors, either physiological and environmental such as stress, or genetic such as ABO blood group [1]. It has previously been suggested that VWF:Ag levels could be partly determined by four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the promoter region of VWF; c.-3268C>G, c.-2709T>C, c.-2661G>A and c.-2527G>A, segregating predominantly as two haplotypes, GCAG (haplotype 1) or CTGA (haplotype 2), with the latter being associated with lower VWF:Ag levels [2, 3]. Shear stress has been shown to enhance VWF promoter activity, with a dinucleotide (GT)n short tandem repeat (STR) located at c.-2144_-2105 in the VWF promoter exhibiting size-dependent mediation of this stress-induced transactivation [4]. Studies on Cushing’s syndrome patients suggest that both the SNPs and STR influence a glucocorticoid-induced increase in plasma VWF:Ag level [5, 6]. However, other studies have failed to reproduce this SNP and STR association [7, 8]. The current study reports the largest investigation of the association between SNP c.-2527G>A, the (GT)n STR, and VWF:Ag levels in healthy controls (HC) from the MCMDM-1VWD study [9] under normal conditions, while controlling for the effect of ABO blood group.

ABO blood group, age and VWF:Ag levels were available for 1115 European male and female healthy controls (HC) from nine countries [9]. None had been referred to a specialist centre due to bleeding problems. VWF:Ag levels were determined at a single centre [9]. Genotypes for the c.-2527G>A SNP were determined using TaqMan allelic discrimination (ABI 7900; Applied Biosystems, Europe BV, Warrington, UK). The VWF region containing the (GT)n STR was amplified by PCR (primer sequences available on request), sequenced and analysed on an ABI PRISM™ 3730 DNA analyser (Applied Biosystems). Analysis of two homozygous samples showed that (GT)n alleles 181bp and 185bp long corresponded to (GT)19 and (GT)21 respectively. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, allele frequencies and linkage disequilibrium analyses were performed using SNPStats: http://bioinfo.iconcologia.net/index.php?module=Snpstats (accessed August 2010). Associations between genotypes and VWF:Ag levels were assessed using Kruskal Wallis tests (GraphPad Prism v5.00, GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). p values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant in all tests.

Genotype data for the c.-2527G>A SNP were used for investigation of a genotype-VWF:Ag relationship. There was no significant association between VWF:Ag level and SNP genotype before or after controlling for the effect of ABO blood group (Table 1A), thus contradicting previous results of a smaller study on blood group O Canadian HC (n=250) [3] which identified a significant association (p=0.006). Presence of an extended founder haplotype in the Canadian population with an effect on VWF level could be a possible explanation. 100 European HC from two countries were also genotyped for the four promoter SNP examined in the Canadian study and the SNP were shown to be in complete linkage disequilibrium (D’=0.999, p<0.0001), segregating as the two previously reported haplotypes GCAG (haplotype 1) and CTGA (haplotype 2). No association of genotype with VWF:Ag levels was found in this subgroup (data not shown).

Table 1.

Association of genotype at VWF locations (A) c.-2527, B) (GT)n and C) (GT)n plus c.-2527 with median levels of VWF in healthy controls from the MCMDM-1VWD study controlling for blood group.

Analysis Genotype and ABO blood group Mean age (SD) n* Median VWF:Ag level (IU/dL) (Range) p value

A) c.-2527G>A All 1115
G/G 40.7 (12.5) 162 96.5 (74.8–119.5) 0.961
G/A 40.2 (11.9) 521 98.0 (77.0–120.0)
A/A 40.5 (11.4) 432 96.0 (75.0–122.0)
O 410
G/G 41.6 (11.3) 51 84.0 (66.0–106.0) 0.747
G/A 42.1 (12.5) 191 80.0 (64.0–98.0)
A/A 41.2 (10.6) 168 78.5 (66.0–99.0)
Non-O 678
G/G 40.8 (13.1) 104 106.0 (81.0–133.0) 0.852
G/A 39.3 (11.4) 319 107.0 (89.0–126.0)
A/A 40.2 (12.0) 255 112.0 (86.0–129.0)

B) (GT)n All 1105
S/S 41.0 (11.5) 196 92.0 (70.3–114.5) 0.027
S/L 40.3 (11.8) 555 97.0 (76.0–120.0)
L/L 40.6 (12.3) 354 100.0 (78.0–125.0)
O 408
S/S 41.8 (11.0) 71 80.0 (62.0–99.0) 0.524
S/L 42.0 (11.7) 199 80.0 (65.0–102.0)
L/L 40.9 (11.6) 138 82.0 (67.8–101.3)
Non-O 569
S/S 41.1 (11.7) 118 101.0 (77.8–124.3) 0.020
S/L 39.3 (11.8) 344 107.5 (86.0–127.0)
L/L 40.7 (12.8) 207 114.0 (91.0–132.0)

C) c.-2527G>A & (GT)n All 727
S/S-G/G 41.3 (12.0) 110 92.0 (71.8–116.3) 0.314
S/L-G/A 39.7 (11.7) 358 96.5 (77.8–120.0)
L/L-A/A 40.7 (11.9) 259 98.0 (76.0–125.0)
O 278
S/S-G/G 41.5 (10.6) 39 84.0 (66.0–101.0) 0.714
S/L-G/A 41.8 (12.0) 134 81.5 (65.8–104.0)
L/L-A/A 40.8 (10.7) 105 85.0 (67.0–103.0)
Non-O 432
S/S-G/G 42.1 (12.5) 65 102.0 (76.5–134.5) 0.387
S/L-G/A 38.6 (11.4) 219 107.0 (87.0–126.0)
L/L-A/A 40.8 (12.9) 148 112.5 (88.0–130.0)
*

ABO blood group data were available for 1088 out of 1115 HC.

Range = 25th–75th percentile.

All: all blood groups; O: blood group O only; Non-O: blood groups other than O.

SD: Standard deviation

Genotyping of the STR identified alleles ranging in size from (GT)16 to (GT)27 with a bimodal distribution, i.e. a peak at (GT)19 (37.2%) and another at (GT)21 (32.2%). The genotype (GT)19/(GT)21 was the most frequent (23.8%), followed by (GT)19/(GT)19 (13.3%) and (GT)21/(GT)21 (10.2%). GT repeat alleles were divided into two subclasses for ease of analysis [8]. Small (S) alleles included all those <(GT)20 and large (L) included those ≥(GT)20. Based on this approach, 42.8% of alleles were (GT)S and 57.2% were (GT)L; 18% HC had genotype S/S, 50% had S/L and 32% had L/L, while genotype distribution was consistent with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p=0.42).

In contrast to the results of a smaller study (n=394 HC) reporting a lack of association between (GT)n genotypes and VWF:Ag levels in HC [8], in this study VWF:Ag values were lower in HC homozygous for S alleles compared to HC heterozygous or homozygous for L alleles (S/S vs S/L vs L/L = 92.0 vs 97.0 vs 100.0 IU/dL, p=0.027) (Table 1B). This association was not maintained when HC of only blood group O were examined (S/S vs S/L vs L/L = 80.0 vs 80.0 vs 82.0 IU/dL, p=0.524), but was observed when examining HC of non-O blood groups (S/S vs S/L vs L/L = 101.0 vs 107.5 vs 114.0 IU/dL, p=0.020) (Table 1B). These data suggest an effect of GT repeat length on VWF levels of ~10% and are in agreement with recent findings suggesting that longer GT repeats induce a larger increase in VWF promoter activity than shorter ones under shear stress conditions [4]. A statistically significant association amongst O blood group HC may only be observed with analysis of a larger number of individuals in this subcategory.

A small degree of linkage was observed between the c.-2527G>A SNP and the (GT)n repeat (D’=0.661, R2=0.597, p<0.0001). The two most frequent haplotypes (S/G and L/A) accounted for ~80% of HC (49.9% and 30.5% respectively). The most frequent genotypes resulting from homozygosity or heterozygosity for the above haplotypes were S/L-G/A (32.8%), L/L-A/A (23.6%) and S/S-G/G (10.1%). Other allele combinations comprised the remaining 33.5% of genotypes. The association between the three genotypes (S/L-G/A, L/L-A/A, S/S-G/G) and VWF:Ag levels was examined in order to identify a potential cooperative effect of the STR and SNP loci on VWF:Ag levels. The results shown in Table 1C suggest that these two polymorphic regions have no significant cooperative effect on VWF:Ag levels in the EU population, before or after controlling for the effect of ABO blood group on VWF:Ag levels (Table 1C). This suggests that an effect on VWF:Ag levels is mediated only by the (GT)n repeat.

In conclusion, this study has provided evidence that the c.-2527G>A VWF promoter SNP does not have a significant effect on levels of VWF in the EU population. In contrast, the VWF (GT)n STR exhibited a small effect on VWF levels, mediated by its length. A SNP/STR cooperative effect on the regulation of VWF:Ag levels in HC was excluded. This is the largest study examining the potential influence of these loci on VWF levels in HC while controlling for the effect of ABO blood group and is the first study to show a significant effect of the c.-2144_-2105 locus on VWF levels under normal conditions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the European Community Fifth Framework. Programme (QLG1-CT-2000-00387) and National Institutes of Health Zimmerman Program for Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD (HL-081588). The authors thank all contributors to the MCMDM-1VWD study and John Anson, Sheffield University for excellent technical support.

References

  • 1.Gill JC, Endres-Brooks J, Bauer PJ, Marks WJ, Jr, Montgomery RR. The effect of ABO blood group on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease. Blood. 1987;69:1691–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Keightley AM, Lam YM, Brady JN, Cameron CL, Lillicrap D. Variation at the von Willebrand factor (vWF) gene locus is associated with plasma vWF:Ag levels: identification of three novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in the vWF gene promoter. Blood. 1999;93:4277–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Harvey PJ, Keightley AM, Lam YM, Cameron C, Lillicrap D. A single nucleotide polymorphism at nucleotide -1793 in the von Willebrand factor (VWF) regulatory region is associated with plasma VWF:Ag levels. Br J Haematol. 2000;109:349–53. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02000.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hough C, Cameron CL, Notley CR, Brown C, O'Brien L, Keightley AM, Berber E, Lillicrap D. Influence of a GT repeat element on shear stress responsiveness of the VWF gene promoter. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6:1183–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03011.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Casonato A, Daidone V, Sartorello F, Albiger N, Romualdi C, Mantero F, Pagnan A, Scaroni C. Polymorphisms in von Willebrand factor gene promoter influence the glucocorticoid-induced increase in von Willebrand factor: the lesson learned from Cushing syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2008;140:230–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06907.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Daidone V, Pontara E, Romualdi C, Cattini MG, Scaroni C, Albiger N, Pagnan A, Casonato A. Microsatellite (GT)(n) is part of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) promoter region that influences the glucocorticoid-induced increase in VWF in Cushing's syndrome. Thromb Res. 2010;125:e275–80. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lethagen S, Hillarp A, Ekholm C, Mattson E, Hallden C, Friberg B. Distribution of von Willebrand factor levels in young women with and without bleeding symptoms: influence of ABO blood group and promoter haplotypes. Thromb Haemost. 2008;99:1013–8. doi: 10.1160/TH07-06-0419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Daidone V, Cattini MG, Pontara E, Sartorello F, Gallinaro L, Marotti A, Scaroni C, Pagnan A, Casonato A. Microsatellite (GT)(n) repeats and SNPs in the von Willebrand factor gene promoter do not influence circulating von Willebrand factor levels under normal conditions. Thromb Haemost. 2009;101:298–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goodeve A, Eikenboom J, Castaman G, Rodeghiero F, Federici AB, Batlle J, Meyer D, Mazurier C, Goudemand J, Schneppenheim R, Budde U, Ingerslev J, Habart D, Vorlova Z, Holmberg L, Lethagen S, Pasi J, Hill F, Hashemi Soteh M, Baronciani L, et al. Phenotype and genotype of a cohort of families historically diagnosed with type 1 von Willebrand disease in the European study, Molecular and Clinical Markers for the Diagnosis and Management of Type 1 von Willebrand Disease (MCMDM-1VWD) Blood. 2007;109:112–21. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-020784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES