Abstract
Photolysis of hydroxocobalamin in the presence of plasmid DNA (pBR322) results in DNA cleavage. Temporal control of hydroxyl radical production and DNA strand scission by hydroxocobalamin was demonstrated using a 2-deoxyribose assay and a plasmid relaxation assay, respectively. The light-driven hydroxocobalamin-mediated catalytic formation of hydroxyl radicals was demonstrated using radical scavenging studies of DNA cleavage and via recycling of a hydroxocobalamin-resin several times without loss of efficacy.
Hydroxyl radicals (·OH) have been used to assess DNA structure1 and to elucidate DNA-binding sites for proteins2 and small molecules.3 An example of the Fenton reaction, in which Fe(II)·EDTA reduces H2O2, is the most commonly used method to generate ·OH. However, for intracellular purposes, a limitation of this method is the inability to precisely control when the reaction starts and stops. A Fenton-like reaction utilizing a caged Cu(II) ion that can be released by photolysis of the ligand cage has been reported.4 This strategy furnishes control over the initiation of the Fenton reaction, albeit not the termination step. Several light-mediated “Fenton reagents” have been developed.5 In contrast to the Fenton reaction, the majority of these compounds have the disadvantage of stoichiometric radical production. TiO2 does catalytically produce ·OH upon exposure to light,6 however since TiO2 induces intracellular oxidative damage in the absence of light,7 it cannot be used in a light-dependent fashion in cell-based studies. By contrast, synchrotron X-ray8 and γ9 irradiation can be used to precisely initiate and terminate ·OH production. Although these methods are advantageous for their ability to provide time resolved information, they are not widely available and they cannot be used to direct oxidative damage to specific intracellular or molecular sites.
Cobalamins, a class of compounds of which Vitamin B12 is a member, could be useful for generating radical species under cellular conditions. For example, photolysis of the cobalt-carbon bond in methylcobalamin (MeCbl; 1 where X = Me) generates cob(II)alamin (B12R) and methyl radical (·CH3) (Scheme 1A).10 Based on this precedent, we wondered whether hydroxocobalamin (B12a where X = OH) could undergo an analogous reaction to generate ·OH and B12R (Scheme 1B). In the presence of oxygen, the latter species is rapidly oxidized to regenerate B12a.10 We therefore investigated the possibility that the combination of light and B12a could be used to oxidatively damage biomolecules via the generation of ·OH.
Scheme 1.
(A) Photolysis of MeCbl to furnish CH3· and (B) proposed light-dependent generation of ·OH by B12a.
Initial studies employed a plasmid relaxation assay to observe the ·OH-mediated conversion of circular, supercoiled DNA (Form I) to relaxed, circular DNA (Form II). A Pyrex filter (>300 nm) was used to photolyze B12a in the presence of pBR322 DNA. Analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis revealed a band corresponding to Form II DNA, but only from the light-exposed reaction mixtures containing B12a (Fig. S1). By contrast, light in the absence of B12a or B12a in the absence of light, does not result in significant DNA damage.
DNA cleavage by B12a does not occur in the absence of O2, an observation consistent with a radical-mediated mechanism of DNA damage (Fig. S3).11 In addition, the ·OH scavengers sorbitol12 and sodium benzoate,13 efficiently prevent DNA cleavage (Fig. S5), thereby supporting the notion that damage is mediated by ·OH. The light-dependence of DNA cleavage was assessed by photolyzing B12a for various time periods followed by incubation in the dark (Fig. S8). Short photolysis periods followed by dark incubation resulted in significantly less strand scission than photolyzing for the same total time period, demonstrating that the species formed by the photolysis of B12a does not continue to damage DNA without continued exposure to light.
We employed an established ·OH assay to assess light-mediated production of ·OH.14 Deoxyribose is attacked by ·OH, generating malondialdehyde that, upon heating with thiobarbituric acid (TBA), produces a chromophore (532 nm).15 Unfortunately, we found that the presence of B12a during the heating step interferes with the assay. Therefore, B12a was immobilized on an aminebearing resin (2) using 1,1′-carbonyldi-(1,2,4-triazole) (Fig. S10). Deoxyribose was incubated with the B12a-resin under photolytic and non-photolytic conditions and the resin was subsequently removed prior to the heating step. The light-driven nature of B12a-resin-mediated ·OH production is evident by the time-dependent production of the TBA-malondialdehyde chromophore in the presence (Fig. 1, average absorbance increase per period: 0.104), but not in the absence (average absorbance increase per period: 0.003), of light.
Figure 1.
Light-driven ·OH production via photolysis of the B12a-resin conjugate 2. The conjugate 2 was suspended in a deoxyribose solution (50 mM in pH 7.4 PBS). The suspension was sequentially photolyzed (60 min total), stored in the dark (100 min total), and photolyzed (60 min total), with aliquots removed and analyzed at various time points.
Photolysis of the Co-methyl bond in MeCbl generates Co(II)-cobalamin and ·CH3 (Scheme 1A). The former, upon oxidation, produces B12a,10 which should generate DNA damaging ·OH under photolytic conditions (Scheme 1B). However, ·CH3 is also capable of causing DNA strand scission.16 We assessed the relative contribution of these two radical species to DNA damage using sorbitol and sodium benzoate (·OH traps) and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO; a carbon-centered radical trap17). TEMPO does not have an appreciable effect on the ability of MeCbl to damage DNA, but sorbitol and sodium benzoate almost completely protect DNA from damage (Fig. S11). Therefore, the initial stoichiometric production of ·CH3 is small compared to that of the B12a-mediated generation of ·OH.
The notion that B12a catalytically produces ·OH is supported by radical trapping studies of DNA damage by re-using the B12a-resin 2 several times without loss in its capacity to damage deoxyribose (Fig. S13). Furthermore, a B12a concentration less than the pBR322 concentration was used to demonstrate catalytic production of strand scission events. Based on the number of observable strand scission events, B12a induced a minimum of 20 damaging events per molecule during 90 min of light exposure (Fig. 2); an underestimate since plasmid relaxation assays do not visualize all DNA nicks. The amount of DNA damage per molecule increased with longer exposure to light. A band corresponding to linear DNA (form III) resulting from nonrandom double-strand cleavage was observed (Figs. S15-16),18 indicative of two radicals originating near each other in time and in space.
Figure 2.
Light-mediated DNA (30 μM/bp in pH 7.4 PBS) by hydroxocobalamin (300 pM). Samples were irradiated with Pyrex-filtered light from a mercury arc lamp.
A B12a-spermine conjugate 3 was synthesized (Fig. S17) and proved useful for directing damage to DNA in an environment with a high concentration of a hydroxyl radical trap. Conjugate 3 forms a DNA complex with an apparent binding constant (Kapp = 1.5 × 108 ± 3.4 × 106 M-1) similar to the reported value for spermine (5.9 × 108 M-1).19 The B12a-spermine conjugate induces DNA damage more effectively than B12a (Fig. S20). More importantly, 10000 equiv. of sorbitol failed to significantly inhibit DNA damage induced by 3, whereas only 100 equiv. of sorbitol significantly inhibited strand scission due to B12a (Fig. S22), suggesting that 3 generates ·OH near the DNA 3 it is bound to.
Light-dependent ·OH production by B12a enjoys several characteristics that make it potentially useful as a generator of ·OH for biological studies. Light is increasingly employed in modern cell biology to control intracellular processes via cell-embedded photosensitive bioactive reagents.20 The combination of light and light-sensitive reagents provides the investigator with exquisite temporal control over cellular biochemistry. Spatial control of oxidative damage is afforded by the addition of a binding moiety to B12a because the highly reactive ·OH is generated proximal to the target biomolecule. In addition, light-induced radical generation with B12a is catalytic, whereas radical generation by other systems is stoichiometric. Future research will focus on conjugating recognition moieties to B12a to direct oxidative damage to specific macromolecules and organelles.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the NIH (CA079954).
Footnotes
Supporting Information Available: Figures S1-S22 and procedures are available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Tullius TD. In: Radiation Research. Moriarty M, editor. Vol. 2. Allen Press; Lawrence, KS: 2000. p. 333. [Google Scholar]
- 2.a Jain SS, Tullius TD. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:1092. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Frazee RW, Taylor JA, Tullius TD. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;323:665. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00996-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Zaychikov E, Schickor P, Denissova L, Heumann H. Methods Mol. Biol. 2001;148:49. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-208-2:049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Trauger JW, Dervan PB. Methods Enzymol. 2001;340:450. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(01)40436-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ciesienski KL, Haas KL, Dickens MG, Tesema YT, Franz KJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:12246. doi: 10.1021/ja8047442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.a Haruna S, Kuroi R, Kajiwara K, Hashimoto R, Matsugo S, Tokumaru S, Kojo S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2002;12:675. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00830-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Adam W, Cadet J, Dall'Acqua F, Epe B, Ramaiah D, Saha Moeller CR. Angew. Chem., Intl. Ed. Eng. 1995;34:107. [Google Scholar]; c Matsugo S, Kawanishi S, Yamamoto K, Sugiyama H, Matsuura T, Saito I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1991;30:1351. [Google Scholar]; d Aveline BM, Matsugo S, Redmond RW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997;119:11785. [Google Scholar]; e Tobin D, Arvanitidis M, Bisby RH. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002;299:155. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02594-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Kitano H, Maeda Y, Furukawa K, Yamamoto T, Izumida R, Matsugo S. Photochem. Photobiol. 1995;62:809. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb09140.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Guptasarma P, Balasubramanian D, Matsugo S, Saito I. Biochemistry. 1992;31:4296. doi: 10.1021/bi00132a021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Takeuchi T, Matsugo S, Morimoto K. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18:2051. doi: 10.1093/carcin/18.11.2051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.a Chang C-Y, Hsieh Y-H, Hsieh L-L, Yao K-S, Cheng T-C. J. Hazard. Mat. 2009;166:897. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Matthews RH. J. Chem. Soc. Chem Comm. 1983:177. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Trouiller B, Reliene R, Westbrook A, Solaimani P, Schiestl RH. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8784. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Gurr J-R, Wang ASS, Chen C-H, Jan K-Y. Toxicology. 2005;213:66. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a Adilakshmi T, Soper SFC, Woodson SA. Methods Enzymol. 2009;468:239 - 58. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)68012-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Brenowitz M, M. R, C., Dhavan G, Takamoto K. 2002;12:648–53. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(02)00366-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ottinger LM, Tullius TD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:5901. [Google Scholar]
- 10.a Taylor R, Smucker L, Hanna ML, Gill J. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1973;156:521. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(73)90301-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Schrauzer GN, Lee L-P, Sibert JW. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970;92:2997. doi: 10.1021/ja00713a012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shell TA, Mohler DL. Curr. Org. Chem. 2007;11:1525. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morelli R, Russo-Volpe S, Bruno N, Scalzo RL. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;51:7418. doi: 10.1021/jf030172q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. J. Biol. Chem. 1970;245:4641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC, Aruoma OI. Anal. Biochem. 1987;165:215. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90222-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.a Gutteridge JMC. FEBS Lett. 1981;128:343. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(81)80113-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Cheeseman KH, Beavis A, Esterbauer H. Biochem. J. 1988;252:64. doi: 10.1042/bj2520649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Gutteridge JMC, Halliwell B. Biochem. J. 1988;253:932. doi: 10.1042/bj2530932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.a Mohler DL, Downs JR, Hurley-Predecki AL, Sallman JR, Gannett PM, Shi X. J. Org. Chem. 2005;70:909. doi: 10.1021/jo050338h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Mohler DL, Dain DR, Kerekes AD, Nadler WR, Scott TL. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998;8:871. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00127-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Connolly TJ, Baldoví MV, Mohtat N, Scaiano JC. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:4919. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Povirk LF, Wübker W, Köhnlein W, Hutchinson F. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977;4:3573. doi: 10.1093/nar/4.10.3573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kapp PD. Biochemistry. 1984;23:4821. doi: 10.1021/bi00316a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee HM, Larson DR, Lawrence DS. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009;19:409. doi: 10.1021/cb900036s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.