Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul 23;53(5):331–341. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0739-9

Table 3.

Analyses of the hemispheric comparisons of the aggregated ROI CTP values for case versus control group included: (1) case affected percent change versus case unaffected (relative case), (2) control affected percent change versus control unaffected (relative control); (3) case affected percent change versus control affected (relative affected); and (4) case unaffected percent change versus control unaffected (relative unaffected).

Hemispheric Comparison CBV CBF MTT TTP Delay
Case affected versus 48.28%* 31.95%* 26.18%* 0.60% −4.93%
Case unaffected
P values *4.45 x 10−6 *1.05 x 10−5 *4.27 x 10−3 3.77 x 10-1 5.64 x 10−1
Control affected versus 2.17% −9.59% 9.18% −2.89% 2.27%
Control unaffected
Case affected versus 45.87% 37.89% 11.11% −5.71% 0.18%
Control affected
Case unaffected versus 0.73% −16.75% 22.46% 2.83% −5.89%
Control unaffected

P values are listed for case affected and unaffected hemisphere comparisons and statistical significance is indicated by an asterisk (*)