Abstract
Systems biology provides an integrative platform by which to account for the biological complexity related to cardiac health and disease. In this way, consequences of ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel deficiency for heart failure prediction, diagnosis, and therapy were resolved recently at a proteomic level. Under stress-free conditions, knockout of the Kir6.2 KATP channel pore induced metabolic proteome remodelling, revealing overrepresentation of markers of cardiovascular disease. Imposed stress precipitated structural and functional defects in Kir6.2-knockout hearts, decreasing survival and validating prediction of disease susceptibility. In the setting of hypertension, a leading risk for heart failure development, proteomic analysis diagnosed the metabolism-centric impact of KATP channel deficiency in disease. Bioinformatic interrogation of KATP channel-dependent proteome prioritized heart-specific adverse effects, exposing cardiomyopathic traits of aggravated contractility, fibrosis, and ventricular hypertrophy. In dilated cardiomyopathy induced by Kir6.2-knockout pressure overload, proteomic remodelling was exacerbated, underlying a multifaceted molecular pathology that indicates the necessity for a broad-based strategy to achieve repair. Embryonic stem cell intervention in cardiomyopathic KATP channel knockout hearts elicited a distinct proteome signature that forecast amelioration of adverse cardiac outcomes. Functional/structural measurements validated improved contractile performance, reduced ventricular size, and decreased cardiac damage in the treated cohort, while systems assessment unmasked cardiovascular development as a prioritized biological function in stem cell-reconstructed hearts. Thus, proteomic deconvolution of KATP channel-deficient hearts provides definitive evidence for the channel's homeostatic contribution to the cardiac metaboproteome and establishes the utility of systems-oriented approaches to predict disease susceptibility, diagnose consequences of heart failure progression, and monitor therapy outcome.
Keywords: ATP-sensitive K+ channel, Bioinformatics, Cardiac, KATP channel, Kir6.2, Genetics, Heart disease, Metabolism, Networks, Protein expression, Proteomics, Regenerative medicine, SUR2A, Stem cells, Systems biology
1. Introduction
High-throughput technologies have expanded the comprehension of cardiac pathobiology by resolving corrupted signalling circuitry, effectors, and mediators in disease.1 Systems biology and network medicine have increasingly enabled the understanding of compromised pathways on a global scale, and have guided judicious development of prognostic discriminators of disease variability and selection of treatment response predictors, honing therapeutic objectives to match resolved disease profiles.2 Decoding maladaptive signatures prior to onset of overt disease permits rational forecast of individual susceptibility.3 Accordingly, anticipatory medicine promises a shift from a reactive paradigm in managing symptoms toward proactive interventions tailored to prevent disease progression or design cures to nullify disease vulnerability.4 The focus of this overview, in the context of applying emerging systems approaches to understanding cardiac dysfunction, is the ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel, a metabolism-gated cardioprotective heteromultimeric complex. We here highlight advances in decoding molecular consequences of channel dysfunction at the proteome-wide level, and underscore implications for a systems comprehension of KATP channelopathy on heart failure prediction, diagnosis, and therapy.
2. Cardiac KATP channels in health and disease
KATP channels are biosensors that enable high-fidelity readout of metabolic distress signals.5–8 Unique among ion channels, these checkpoints perform a rheostat-like operation adjusting membrane potential-dependent functions to match energetic demands of the working heart.9–11 KATP channel complexes form through co-assembly of the KCNJ11-encoded Kir6.2 pore subunits with the regulatory ATP-binding cassette sulfonylurea receptor.12–17 Abundant in myocardial sarcolemma, where they were originally discovered,18 KATP channels have also been reported to reside within intracellular membranes including secretory granules, nuclei, mitochondria, and endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum.19 KATP channel deficit impairs tolerance to sympathetic surge, endurance challenge, or haemodynamic load, and compromises the protective benefit of ischaemic preconditioning and postconditioning,20–26 whereas disruption of the KATP channel blunts this protective response.27,28 Genetic investigations have linked KATP channel mutations to human cardiac diseases, including heritable dilated cardiomyopathy and cardiac arrhythmia, both of which have been verified in murine knockout models deprived of operational channels.29,30 More recently, a common polymorphism in the KCNJ11 gene encoding the Kir6.2 pore-forming subunit has been identified as a risk factor for maladaptive cardiac remodelling in the population-at-large,31 and linked to abnormal cardiopulmonary performance in patients with heart failure.32 In fact, multiple mechanisms underlying KATP channelopathies have been proposed, including abnormal ligand–channel interaction, defective catalytic signal processing, suboptimal subunit trafficking, and aberrant pore conductance.33 Although the KATP channel's relationship with cell metabolism contributes to stress tolerance, a broader understanding of multifaceted effects on the cellular milieu, including implications for heart disease, has been lacking. Through use of systems biology, it is only recently that an initial insight into the molecular consequences of channel deficiency has been obtained, and linked to disease predisposition, progression of overt organ failure, and targeted therapy.34–36
3. Systems biology: an emerging tool for investigating heart disease complexity
Systems biology provides an integrative platform by which to account for the biological complexity related to cardiac health and disease. Beyond traditional reductionist efforts focused on individual molecules or pathways, systems strategies incorporate the multiplicity of relationships among these components and their established interactions within acquired high throughput data sets to comprehend the system as a whole (Box 1).37–42 Comprising one or more elements of genomic (±epigenetic markers), transcriptomic (±microRNA), proteomic (±post-translational modifications), or metabolomic information, systems analyses necessitate interdisciplinary convergence of biological, computational, and mathematical tools by which to formulate insights, or to synthesize models or hypotheses (Figure 1).38,42 Computational and mathematical contributions also facilitate analytical iteration, with initial hypotheses or models subject to further refinement and/or interpretation following biological testing or validation.42 While ‘omic data at any level, individually or in combination, may serve as an initiation or focal point, the proteome is responsible for execution of the majority of physiological processes, and is the culmination of combinatorial epigenetic, transcriptional, translational, and post-translational effects arising at various levels across lifespan and the health-disease spectrum, which ultimately define the phenotype.43 Accordingly, molecular systems approaches benefit from assessment of protein modulation. Moreover, proteins function not in isolation but rather as discrete elements within extensive networks of interacting components, so assembly of biologically relevant interactomes serves as a means of accounting for documented interrelationships. Networks can then be scrutinized by their constituent elements (nodes, edges), architectural indices of connectivity (e.g. scale-free topology, or nodes which often exhibit greater relevance due to connectivity characteristics within the network, such as hubs or bridging nodes)40,44,45 or for overrepresentation by ontological or disease markers, for subsequent insight, model or hypothesis generation (Box 1).42,46 While attractive for systems approaches, there are certain limitations to network analysis with respect to quality of input data, differences in data assessment and output by various pathway analysis algorithms, and the relative flexibility of network architecture for portraying biological dynamics.42 With proper consideration of caveats, however, proteome-centric systems biology offers a rational platform by which to prioritize and guide interpretation of complex systems behaviour (Figure 1), such as that associated with the spectrum of heart disease progression from a presymptomatic state to one of overt failure.
Box 1. Proteomic systems biology glossary
Proteomics: The study of the structure and function of proteins expressed by the genome, including the way they work and interact with each other.
Subproteome: A subset of a proteome, which may correspond to the portion residing in a specific cellular compartment, involved in a particular functional attribute, or is modulated or dependent upon a particular biological effect (e.g. KATP channel deficiency).
Metaboproteome: The subproteome involved in and supporting cellular metabolic function.
Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis: A means of resolving proteome constituents, through the orthogonal resolution of intact proteins by intrinsic properties, typically involving separation by inherent charge, followed by relative molecular mass.
Systems biology: Analytical approach by which to investigate relationships among a system's components in order to understand its emergent properties.
Network/Interactome: Collection of components connected by interdependent interactions and/or relationships, based on the mathematical field of graph theory.
Network medicine/biology: Analysis of molecular (e.g. protein or gene) interaction networks through complex network theory, comprising topological features that characterize the symmetric or asymmetric relationships among discrete network objects and their known interactions to guide medical or biological interpretation.
Node: In network biology, cellular entities including one or more of the following, such as genes, proteins or metabolites.
Edge: In network biology, a relationship between nodes or node self-interaction, which may involve physical, regulatory, or genetic interactions and may be undirected or directed (uni- or bi-directional).
Scale-free topology: Biological networks exhibit a power law distribution in terms of node connectivity, giving a consistent slope independent of the scale of connectivity, which influences network robustness.
Hub: A node or small number of nodes much more highly connected to other network constituents than would be expected at random, arising from the scale-free topology observed within biological networks.
Bridging node: A node bridging the shortest path between two other nodes or modules within a network, the characteristics of which can be used to identify critical network bottlenecks.
Figure 1.
Proteome-centric network-based systems approach. High throughput data acquisition comparing health vs. disease from various levels of biological complexity, e.g. comparative proteomics, can be integrated by data mining and bioinformatic processing into networks that comprise an expanded neighbourhood of system perturbation. Network composition, topological parameters, and ontological representation provide foci and targets for hypothesis generation and experimental testing. In conjunction or independently, interaction networks also provide a global template for computational modelling, simulation, and prediction. Together, these approaches facilitate efforts towards comprehension of biological systems and their emergent properties, and readily enable iterative refinement to maximize resolution of predictive, diagnostic, and therapeutic application paradigms.
4. Network-based prediction of KATP channel-dependent cardiac disease susceptibility
Forecasting disease susceptibility requires detection of molecular signatures predictive of cardiac vulnerability prior to symptom onset. Indeed, experimentally, systems approaches to delineate maladaptive subclinical proteomic profiles have the potential to reveal individual disease susceptibility traits. In turn, this would enable enrichment of traditional reactive interventions for heart disease management with rationally designed proactive strategies aimed at alleviating or precluding disease manifestation.
Feasibility of forecasting cardiac outcome from a presymptomatic proteomic signature was recently systematically investigated by proteome-wide network systems analysis in the setting of KATP channel deficiency produced by knockout of the KCNJ11 gene, encoding the pore-forming Kir6.2 subunit.34 Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis resolution of ventricular cytosolic subproteomes obtained from wild-type and Kir6.2 knockout cohorts matched by age (8–12-week-old young adults) and sex (all male), exposed nearly 9% of detected protein species as significantly altered as a consequence of channel deletion (Figure 2A and B). Ontological annotation revealed that the 102 KATP channel-dependent proteins, identified following tandem mass spectrometry, encompassed a broad spectrum of cellular functions, indicating the proteomic/molecular complexity of remodelling associated with ablation of ventricular plasmalemmal KATP channels.34 Metabolism was prioritized among the entirety of delineated changes (Figure 2B), with 63 of the 102 altered proteins functioning directly in bioenergetics, including several components each from the tricarboxylic acid cycle, fatty acid β-oxidation, glycolysis, as well as electron transfer flavoprotein subunits and enzymes involved in amino acid and nucleic acid metabolism.34 Among this array of metabolic changes were several proteins with previously established links to the cardiac KATP channel, including creatine kinase isoforms, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, lactate dehydrogenase, long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, pyruvate kinase, and triosephosphate isomerase.47–55 Overall, systems proteomics greatly expanded the number of bioenergetic enzymes coupled to intact KATP channel activity, reinforcing the critical metabolic sensor function performed by the channel.
Figure 2.
Forecasting cardiac outcome from a presymptomatic proteomic signature. (A) At baseline, no differences were observed in cardiac structure or function between age- and sex-matched wild-type and Kir6.2 KATP channel knockout cohorts. Left ventricular tissue was extracted for proteomic analysis by comparative 2D gel electrophoresis resolution. (B) Statistical analysis of quantified 2D gel images indicated significant differences in 9% of detected protein species, subsequently isolated and identified by tandem mass spectrometry and categorized by primary protein function, revealing a metabolism-centric theme of protein change. (C) Altered proteins served as focus proteins for network analysis, with Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base expanding the KATP channel-dependent changes into a broader network neighbourhood, which reinforced the metabolic focus of measured changes both by ontological function (shown) and by ontological assessment of overrepresented biological processes (not shown).34 (D) Bioinformatic interrogation of proteome changes and their expanded network, for the presence of potential adverse effects, indicated an overrepresentation of markers associated with susceptibility to cardiac disease. Subsequent experimental imposition of graded stress validated disease susceptibility, with the Kir6.2 deficient cohort exhibiting progressively deleterious structural and functional cardiac defects, ultimately decreasing survival. *P< 0.05 vs. WT counterparts; **P< 0.01 vs. WT counterparts.
Subsequent assessment of the interaction network encompassing the altered proteins reinforced the metabolism-centric focus of measured KATP channel-dependent changes, despite reduction in the proportion of metabolic proteins from 62% of detected proteomic differences (Figure 2B) to 38% in the composite network neighbourhood (Figure 2C). In addition, the network exposed indices predicting susceptibility of KATP channel-deficient hearts to cardiovascular disease (Figure 2D).34 In total, Gene Ontology analysis linked 962 biological processes to the network, only 55 of which were considered overrepresented based on hypergeometric distribution of network constituents relative to the full proteome. Of note, however, every one of these 55 was a metabolic process, reiterating the glycolytic, tricarboxylic acid cycle, fatty acid, and amino acid bioenergetic functions noted above for the proteome data, while also revealing additional significant processes such as nucleotide and pentose phosphate metabolism, and a number of protein catabolic processes observed at the proteome level as a general downregulation of specific proteasome subunits.34 These data underscore that KATP channel rheostat-like activity has multifaceted effects on cardiac metabolic homeostasis. Importantly, network analysis also revealed overrepresentation of markers associated with susceptibility to cardiovascular disease. This was subsequently validated by experimental imposition of graded stress, which resulted in structural and functional cardiac defects and decreased survival in the Kir6.2 deficient cohort (Figure 2D).34 Proteomic mapping of KATP channel-deficient adaptation by the heart thus provided an integral view of cardiac molecular remodelling, definitive evidence for the channel's homeostatic contribution to the cardiac metaboproteome, and establishment of the utility of a systems-based approach to anticipate outcome at a subclinical stage.
5. Systems-oriented diagnosis of adverse cardiac effects in response to KATP channel-deficient metaboproteome changes
In the spectrum of cardiac disease progression, differential responsiveness to stress influences which individuals will transition from a state of risk to one of overt disease.56 Hypertension, for example, is a leading risk factor for development of cardiomyopathy and heart failure,57–59 yet adaptation to hypertensive stress load is highly variable. Adverse manifestations of hypertension include ventricular enlargement, interstitial fibrosis, and ultimately organ dysfunction, significantly contributing to morbidity and mortality in the population.60–62 However, homeostatic processes ensuring stress tolerance are only partially understood,63,64 warranting elucidation of individual cardioprotective components and their underlying systems organization within the hypertensive myocardium. In this regard, systems-oriented strategies serve a diagnostic function, documenting composite molecular substrates for assessment and stratification of the differential capacity to respond to cardiac stressors.
To gain a broader understanding of the KATP channel's relationship with the cellular milieu and its implication on stress response to cardiac risk factors, consequences of myocardial channel deficiency in the setting of mineralocorticoid/salt-induced hypertension65 were investigated by a proteomic systems approach.35 Following establishment of comparable hypertension in wild-type and Kir6.2 knockout counterparts, all age- and sex-matched young adult males, comparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis was conducted on ventricular cytosolic subproteomes, where 9% of detected protein species were significantly altered due to the absence of functional KATP channels.35 Consistent with the extent and diversity of changes observed in the absence of stress,34 ontological annotation of the KATP channel-dependent protein differences identified following tandem mass spectrometry comprised an array of cellular functions, yet had an overarching metaboproteomic focus. In this instance, 64% of altered proteins (73/114) were of metabolic function, including constituents of oxidative phosphorylation and electron transfer subunits, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, fatty acid β-oxidation, and glycolysis, as well as amino acid and nucleic acid metabolism.35 The sensitivity and specificity of proteomic screening detected significant changes to a number of proteins with previously established cardiac KATP channel relationships, including adenylate kinase 1, creatine kinase M, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, lactate dehydrogenase isoforms A and B, long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase, and triosephosphate isomerase.47–51,66 Combining proteomic studies, a total of 174 different proteins exhibited significant expression differences in response to KATP channel deficiency, including 95 unique metabolic proteins,34,35 which subsumes all 9 bioenergetic enzymes previously linked to KATP channel activity47–55,66 while increasing their total by an order of magnitude.
Network analysis was used to chart physiological and pathophysiological systems processes associated with the hypertensive Kir6.2-dependent subproteome. The resolved scale-free KATP channel-dependent network unmasked ontological linkage to modules of bioenergetic and metabolism-related processes, integrating multiple energy producing, consuming, and distributing pathways.35 By encompassing hallmarks of cardiovascular energy metabolism,67 the composite network neighbourhood provided a systems framework for diagnostic interrogation of KATP channel impact in the setting of hypertension.68 From a broad spectrum of 134 pathological conditions and toxicological pathways curated in Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base (one of several pathway/interaction analysis algorithms enabling network assembly and interrogation of -omic data sets through the application of published interactions and established molecular associations with associated (patho)physiological conditions and/or phenotypes), the KATP channel-dependent network exclusively extracted three adverse effects: ‘Cardiac Damage’, ‘Cardiac Enlargement’, and ‘Cardiac Fibrosis’, indicating a critical role for KATP channels in coordinating an appropriate adaptive response to hypertensive stress.35 Diagnosed maladaptive responses were validated functionally and structurally, with Kir6.2 deficient hearts demonstrating, relative to wild-type counterparts, poor cardiac muscle performance, increased heart to body weight ratios and exaggerated collagen deposition, indicating damage, enlargement, and fibrosis, respectively.35 Thus, Kir6.2 ablation engenders unfavourable proteomic remodelling in hypertensive hearts, providing a composite molecular substrate for pathological stress-associated cardiovascular disease in the setting of KATP channel deficiency. Diagnosis of severe adverse cardiac effects, predicted from the resolved Kir6.2-dependent metaboproteome network, establishes a vital role for KATP channels in adaptability under pathophysiological stress.
6. Stem cell therapy rescues KATP channel-dependent cardiac structure/function deficiencies
Defects in KATP channels predispose to the pathogenesis of heart failure.20,21,29,32,69 The multifaceted molecular pathology underlying KATP channel deficit indicates the need for a broad-based strategy to achieve repair. The emergence of stem cell technology provides a rational foundation for targeted heart repair without necessitating whole organ replacement.70–74 Although continuous rejuvenation of cardiac muscle has been recognized as a self-repair mechanism, the regenerative reserve is insufficient to salvage the failing heart.75–78 In fact, the cardiomyopathic process is precipitated by depletion of the resident cardiac stem cell pool.79 Introduction of progenitor cells into the diseased heart offers thereby a means of promoting the healing process, as recently demonstrated by embryonic stem cell therapy in the context of KATP channel ablation recapitulating human dilated cardiomyopathy type 1O (CMD 1O).80 In this regard, it has been established that stem cell progeny acquire a cardiogenic phenotype with functional excitation–contraction coupling associated with maturation of the cellular energetic matrix, and when transplanted into damaged heart contribute to repopulation of functional myocardium, improving contractile performance.81–86 Stem cell lineage commitment and integration within diseased host myocardium has been further documented,87–90 but the molecular substrate underlying repair remains unknown.
Transverse aortic constriction (TAC) imposes sustained pressure overload on the left ventricle resulting in contractile dysfunction and cardiomegaly, characteristic of congestive heart failure in the KCNJ11 Kir6.2 knockout, consistent with human KATP channel-deficient dilated cardiomyopathy.80,91 To assess molecular consequences of TAC-imposed stress in the absence and presence of stem-cell intervention in age- and sex-matched young adult male cohorts, pre-stressed KCNJ11 knockouts were compared with pressure-overloaded Kir6.2 knockouts randomized into untreated and embryonic stem cell-treated cohorts.36 Comparative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis resolved 12% of proteome species as significantly altered in the untreated group subject to TAC-induced pressure overload, whereas 7% of the proteome differed from controls in the cell therapy cohort. Tandem mass spectrometric identification indicated that altered proteins were primarily metabolic in nature, comprising 64 and 68% of identified changes in the untreated and stem cell-treated KATP channel-deficient cardiomyopathic groups, respectively. Both groups also exhibited similar breakdowns in total numbers of altered proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation (n = 13 in untreated, 8 in treated), the tricarboxylic acid cycle (n = 13 in untreated, 12 in treated), and other substrate metabolism (n = 44 in untreated, 43 in treated). When compared with untreated hearts, however, cell therapy eliminated 68% of disease-induced protein changes and reduced extent of fold change in an additional 16%, reorganizing the proteome landscape of failing hearts.36
Generation of protein–protein interactions further supported a divergence between observed changes in the untreated and stem cell-treated KATP channel-deficient cardiomyopathic networks. Roughly two-thirds of proteins comprising nodes of either network were mutually exclusive of the other, despite similar representation of categorical functions, suggesting different functional consequences in the absence and presence of stem cell therapy.36 Bioinformatic interrogation of networks demonstrated an overrepresented ‘Cardiac Disease’ category associated with the untreated cardiomyopathic network, consistent with heart disease susceptibility, the extent of which was reduced by three orders of magnitude for the stem cell-treated network. Further screening of the untreated cardiomyopathic network for associated pathological conditions and toxicological pathways within the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base extracted seven overrepresented cardiac adverse effects, namely ‘Cardiac Damage’, ‘Cardiac Dilation’, ‘Cardiac Dysplasia’, ‘Cardiac Enlargement’, ‘Cardiac Inflammation’, ‘Cardiac Hypertrophy', and ‘Cardiac Fibrosis’. Conversely, assessment of the embryonic stem cell-treated cardiomyopathic network indicated that six of these seven detrimental outcomes were no longer statistically overrepresented, suggesting functional and structural benefit of stem cell intervention in the setting of cardiomyopathy.36 To functionally validate bioinformatic prediction, cardiac function and structure were assessed in vivo in untreated and stem cell-treated cohorts by prospective echocardiography and pathoanatomical analysis. The untreated cardiomyopathic cohort demonstrated significant and progressive cardiac dysfunction and associated heart chamber enlargement, precipitating without therapy high mortality rates and poor survival. In contrast, stem cell intervention significantly improved cardiac contractility and prevented cardiac dilation, nullifying premature mortality.36 Serial monitoring of fractional shortening from the point of randomization indicated continuous deterioration without cell therapy, but improved fractional shortening with cell therapy at multiple time points. A significant decline in the ejection fraction due to cardiomyopathy was reversed towards pre-stress levels by stem cell treatment. Functional improvement was supported by favourable structural remodelling in response to stem cell therapy. While cardiac dilation in untreated hearts was marked over the duration of follow-up, cell therapy was effective in maintaining diastolic dimension.80 Moreover, progressive structural deterioration measured as a significant decrease in wall thickness and increase in left ventricular volume that occurred in response to pressure overload without treatment were prevented following stem cell delivery. Histological analysis indicated engraftment of trans-differentiated stem cells into host heart, cell cycle activation, and indices of remuscularization with halved fibrotic zones and normalized sarcomeric and gap junction organization.80 Thus, bioinformatic prediction of amelioration of specific cardiomyopathic traits were validated in response to cell therapy.36
Direct comparison between the untreated and treated cardiomyopathic groups identified 61 proteins altered by stem cell intervention.36 Systems interrogation of the network generated from these proteins unmasked ‘Cardiovascular System Development’ as a prioritized biological function in stem cell-reconstructed cardiomyopathic hearts. In contrast, this function was not prioritized in the untreated cardiomyopathic network, indicating a cardio-rejuvenative substrate induced by stem cell intervention.36 Thus, iterative proteome-wide network resolution unmasked a regenerative signature induced by embryonic stem cell treatment of failing heart in the context of KATP channel-deficient cardiomyopathy.
7. Conclusions
Comprehensive proteomic studies have recently resolved the KATP channel dependent subproteome within the heart, providing direct evidence for the channel's metabolism-centric requirement.34–36 Deletion of the KCNJ11 gene encoding the KATP channel pore protein Kir6.2 altered roughly one-tenth of detected protein species within the left ventricle, underscoring the vital importance of KATP channel activity in maintaining cardiac metabolic homeostasis. At a presymptomatic state, KATP channel deficiency leads to extensive, complex remodelling of the metaboproteome, and results in a phenotype susceptible to cardiac dysfunction anticipated on the basis of observed protein changes.34 This broadens channel implication beyond conditions of stress to maintenance of cardiac homeostasis. In turn, disease vulnerability translates to an inability under conditions of stress to adapt and respond appropriately to increased cardiac demand.35 Progressively deleterious structural and functional myocardial consequences ensue, including reduced contractility, interstitial fibrosis, and ventricular hypertrophy, eventually resulting in the heart failure syndrome. The multifaceted nature of KATP channel-dependent dysfunction was reversed by broad-based cell therapy to achieve heart repair. Stem cell therapy rescued adverse cardiac outcomes, improving functional and structural contractile performance documented through proteomic unmasking of an underlying cardio-rejuvenative process.36 Thus, proteomic decoding of KATP channel-deficient hearts, from a state of health to one of severe disease, maps the spectrum of the channel-dependent molecular network mediating resilience to heart disease, and which becomes corrupted in heart failure requiring regenerative therapeutic solutions.
Indeed, heart failure is a multi-factorial syndrome accompanied by one or more co-morbidities, which may be thought of more as the consequence of failing complexity rather than of a failing system, organ, cell, receptor, molecule, or gene. As described here, even a single monogenic lesion such as Kir6.2 ablation may lead to extensive proteomic remodelling. By extension, future studies to discern the complexities of heart disease would benefit from a similar application of principles of non-linear complex systems biology as a complement to traditional linear feedback approaches of data processing. Conceptually, this may include different triggers or aetiologies of heart failure, specific targets such as metabolic remodelling, or investigation of potential therapeutic avenues. Future multidisciplinary, patient-tailored heart failure studies would be enhanced by addition of phenotype-guided and systems biology conceptually oriented approaches to complement existing strategies. Since systems biology strategies readily incorporate multiple data sources, subsequent investigation will likely expand beyond proteomic analyses. Indeed, proteomic sampling may not be readily acquired in a clinical setting, necessitating a more minimally invasive surrogate (e.g. proteomic or metabolomic analysis of blood samples). However, the application of proteomics in a preclinical model of cardiac dysfunction provides an initial systems survey for comprehension of underlying mechanisms of multi-systems heart failure, providing important leads for complementary investigation from these less invasive surrogate techniques to facilitate clinical screening and/or prediction. As described here in the context of a preclinical model of KATP channel-deficient hearts, proteomic network-based systems analyses provide a flexible template on which to assemble observed molecular changes, facilitating their integration with subsequent mechanistic analyses to interpret and understand their collective effects on maintenance of cardiac homeostasis in health and disease.
Funding
D.K.A. is the recipient of a Marriott Individualized Medicine Career Development Award, and S.Y. is the recipient of a Marriott Mitochondrial Award. Work in the laboratory of the authors was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants HL 64822 and HL 83439.
Acknowledgements
A.T. holds the Marriott Family Professorship in Cardiovascular Research at Mayo Clinic.
Conflict of interest: none declared.
References
- 1.Feero WG, Guttmacher AE, Collins FS. Genomic medicine—an updated primer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2001–2011. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0907175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Waldman SA, Terzic A. Molecular therapeutics from knowledge to delivery. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87:619–623. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ng PC, Murray SS, Levy S, Venter JC. An agenda for personalized medicine. Nature. 2009;461:724–726. doi: 10.1038/461724a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Waldman SA, Terzic A. Clinical and translational science: from bench-bedside to global village. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3:254–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00227.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zingman LV, Hodgson DM, Alekseev AE, Terzic A. Stress without distress: homeostatic role for KATP channels. Mol Psychiatry. 2003;8:253–254. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ashcroft FM. From molecule to malady. Nature. 2006;440:440–447. doi: 10.1038/nature04707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nichols CG. KATP channels as molecular sensors of cellular metabolism. Nature. 2006;440:470–476. doi: 10.1038/nature04711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Reyes S, Park S, Terzic A, Alekseev AE. KATP channels process nucleotide signals in muscle thermogenic response. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2010;45:506–519. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2010.513374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zingman LV, Hodgson DM, Bast PH, Kane GC, Perez-Terzic C, Gumina RJ, et al. Kir6.2 is required for adaptation to stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:13278–13283. doi: 10.1073/pnas.212315199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alekseev AE, Reyes S, Yamada S, Hodgson-Zingman DM, Sattiraju S, Zhu Z, et al. Sarcolemmal ATP-sensitive K+ channels control energy expenditure determining body weight. Cell Metab. 2010;11:58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2009.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Flagg TP, Enkvetchakul D, Koster JC, Nichols CG. Muscle KATP channels: recent insights to energy sensing and myoprotection. Physiol Rev. 2010;90:799–829. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Aguilar-Bryan L, Nichols CG, Wechsler SW, Clement JP, IV, Boyd AE, III, González G, et al. Cloning of the β cell high-affinity sulfonylurea receptor: a regulator of insulin secretion. Science. 1995;268:423–426. doi: 10.1126/science.7716547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Inagaki N, Gonoi T, Clement JP, IV, Namba N, Inazawa J, González G, et al. Reconstitution of IKATP: an inward rectifier subunit plus the sulfonylurea receptor. Science. 1995;270:1166–1170. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5239.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Inagaki N, Gonoi T, Clement JP, IV, Wang CZ, Aguilar-Bryan L, Bryan J, et al. A family of sulfonylurea receptors determines the pharmacological properties of ATP-sensitive K+ channels. Neuron. 1996;16:1011–1017. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80124-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lorenz E, Terzic A. Physical association between recombinant cardiac ATP-sensitive K+ channel subunits Kir6.2 and SUR2A. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:425–434. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1998.0876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vivaudou M, Moreau CJ, Terzic A. Structure and function of ATP-sensitive K+ channels. In: Kew J, Davies C, editors. Ion Channels: From Structure to Function. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. pp. 454–473. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Park S, Terzic A. Quaternary structure of KATP channel SUR2A nucleotide binding domains resolved by synchrotron radiation X-ray scattering. J Struct Biol. 2010;169:243–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2009.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Noma A. ATP-regulated K+ channels in cardiac muscle. Nature. 1983;305:147–148. doi: 10.1038/305147a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Quesada I, Soria B. Intracellular location of KATP channels and sulphonylurea receptors in the pancreatic beta-cell: new targets for oral antidiabetic agents. Curr Med Chem. 2004;11:2707–2716. doi: 10.2174/0929867043364379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kane GC, Liu XK, Yamada S, Olson TM, Terzic A. Cardiac KATP channels in health and disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;38:937–943. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Olson TM, Terzic A. Human KATP channelopathies: diseases of metabolic homeostasis. Pflugers Arch. 2010;460:295–306. doi: 10.1007/s00424-009-0771-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grover GJ, Dzwonczyk S, Parham CS, Sleph PG. The protective effects of cromakalim and pinacidil on reperfusion function and infarct size in isolated perfused rat hearts and anesthetized dogs. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1990;4:465–474. doi: 10.1007/BF01857755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gross GJ, Auchampach JA. Blockade of ATP-sensitive potassium channels prevents myocardial preconditioning in dogs. Circ Res. 1992;70:223–233. doi: 10.1161/01.res.70.2.223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao ZQ, Corvera JS, Halkos ME, Kerendi F, Wang NP, Guyton RA, et al. Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H579–H588. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01064.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Halkos ME, Kerendi F, Corvera JS, Wang NP, Kin H, Payne CS, et al. Myocardial protection with postconditioning is not enhanced by ischemic preconditioning. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:961–969. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yang X-M, Proctor JB, Cui L, Krieg T, Downey JM, Cohen MV. Multiple, brief coronary occlusions during early reperfusion protect hearts by targeting cell signaling pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1103–1110. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gumina RJ, Pucar D, Bast P, Hodgson DM, Kurtz CE, Dzeja PP, et al. Knockout of Kir6.2 negates ischemic preconditioning-induced protection of myocardial energetics. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;284:H2106–H2113. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00057.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gumina RJ, O'Cochlain DF, Kurtz CE, Bast P, Pucar D, Mishra P, et al. KATP channel knockout worsens myocardial calcium stress load in vivo and impairs recovery in stunned heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292:H1706–H1713. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01305.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bienengraeber M, Olson TM, Selivanov VA, Kathmann EC, O'Cochlain F, Gao F, et al. ABCC9 mutations identified in human dilated cardiomyopathy disrupt catalytic KATP channel gating. Nat Genet. 2004;36:382–377. doi: 10.1038/ng1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Olson TM, Alekseev AE, Moreau C, Liu XK, Zingman LV, Miki T, et al. KATP channel mutation confers risk for vein of Marshall adrenergic atrial fibrillation. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4:110–116. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Reyes S, Terzic A, Mahoney DW, Redfield MM, Rodeheffer RJ, Olson TM. KATP channel polymorphism is associated with left ventricular size in hypertensive individuals: a large-scale community-based study. Hum Genet. 2008;123:665–667. doi: 10.1007/s00439-008-0519-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reyes S, Park S, Johnson BD, Terzic A, Olson TM. KATP channel Kir6.2 E23K variant overrepresented in human heart failure is associated with impaired exercise stress response. Hum Genet. 2009;126:779–789. doi: 10.1007/s00439-009-0731-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Terzic A, Perez-Terzic C. Channelopathies: decoding disease pathogenesis. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001433. 42ps37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Arrell DK, Zlatkovic J, Kane GC, Yamada S, Terzic A. ATP-sensitive K+ channel knockout induces cardiac proteome remodeling predictive of heart disease susceptibility. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:4823–4834. doi: 10.1021/pr900561g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zlatkovic J, Arrell DK, Kane GC, Miki T, Seino S, Terzic A. Proteomic profiling of KATP channel-deficient hypertensive heart maps risk for maladaptive cardiomyopathic outcome. Proteomics. 2009;9:1314–1325. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zlatkovic-Lindor J, Arrell DK, Yamada S, Nelson TJ, Terzic A. ATP-sensitive K+ channel-deficient dilated cardiomyopathy proteome remodeled by embryonic stem cell therapy. Stem Cells. 2010;28:1355–1367. doi: 10.1002/stem.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hood L, Heath JR, Phelps ME, Lin B. Systems biology and new technologies enable predictive and preventative medicine. Science. 2004;306:640–643. doi: 10.1126/science.1104635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Weston AD, Hood L. Systems biology, proteomics, and the future of health care: toward predictive, preventative, and personalized medicine. J Proteome Res. 2004;3:179–196. doi: 10.1021/pr0499693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hood L, Perlmutter RM. The impact of systems approaches on biological problems in drug discovery. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1215–1217. doi: 10.1038/nbt1004-1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Goh KI, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabási A-L. The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:8685–8690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701361104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kohl P, Noble D. Systems biology and the virtual physiological human. Mol Syst Biol. 2009;5:292. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arrell DK, Terzic A. Network systems biology for drug discovery. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;88:120–125. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Arrell DK, Neverova I, Van Eyk JE. Cardiovascular proteomics: evolution and potential. Circ Res. 2001;88:763–773. doi: 10.1161/hh0801.090193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Barabási A-L, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004;5:101–113. doi: 10.1038/nrg1272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Newman MEJ. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 2003;45:167–256. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pawson T, Linding R. Network medicine. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:1266–1270. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Crawford RM, Ranki HJ, Botting CH, Budas GR, Jovanović A. Creatine kinase is physically associated with the cardiac ATP-sensitive K+ channel in vivo. FASEB J. 2002;16:102–104. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0466fje. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dhar-Chowdhury P, Harrell MD, Han SY, Jankowska D, Parachuru L, Morrissey A, et al. The glycolytic enzymes, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, triose-phosphate isomerase, and pyruvate kinase are components of the KATP channel macromolecular complex and regulate its function. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:38464–38470. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508744200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Jovanović S, Du Q, Crawford RM, Budas GR, Stagljar I, Jovanović A. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase serves as an accessory protein of the cardiac sarcolemmal KATP channel. EMBO Rep. 2005;6:848–852. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu GX, Hanley PJ, Ray J, Daut J. Long-chain acyl-coenzyme A esters and fatty acids directly link metabolism to KATP channels in the heart. Circ Res. 2001;88:918–924. doi: 10.1161/hh0901.089881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Abraham MR, Selivanov VA, Hodgson DM, Pucar D, Zingman LV, Wieringa B, et al. Coupling of cell energetics with membrane metabolic sensing: integrative signaling through creatine kinase phosphotransfer disrupted by M-CK gene knock-out. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:24427–24434. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M201777200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Crawford RM, Budas GR, Jovanović S, Ranki HJ, Wilson TJ, Davies AM, et al. M-LDH serves as a sarcolemmal KATP channel subunit essential for cell protection against ischemia. EMBO J. 2002;21:3936–3948. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Alekseev AE, Hodgson DM, Karger AB, Park S, Zingman LV, Terzic A. ATP-sensitive K+ channel channel/enzyme multimer: metabolic gating in the heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;38:895–905. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Selivanov VA, Alekseev AE, Hodgson DM, Dzeja PP, Terzic A. Nucleotide-gated KATP channels integrated with creatine and adenylate kinases: amplification, tuning and sensing of energetic signals in the compartmentalized cellular environment. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;256–257:243–256. doi: 10.1023/b:mcbi.0000009872.35940.7d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hodgson DM, Zingman LV, Kane GC, Perez-Terzic C, Bienengraeber M, Ozcan C, et al. Cellular remodeling in heart failure disrupts KATP channel-dependent stress tolerance. EMBO J. 2003;22:1732–1742. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bell J. Predicting disease using genomics. Nature. 2004;429:453–456. doi: 10.1038/nature02624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kostis JB. From hypertension to heart failure: update on the management of systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16:18S–22S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(03)00966-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Krum H, Gilbert RE. Demographics and concomitant disorders in heart failure. Lancet. 2003;362:147–158. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13869-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tocci G, Sciarretta S, Volpe M. Development of heart failure in recent hypertension trials. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1477–1486. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282fe1d3d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119:e21–e181. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.191261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Towbin JA, Bowles NE. The failing heart. Nature. 2002;415:227–233. doi: 10.1038/415227a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Susic D, Frohlich ED. The aging hypertensive heart: a brief update. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:104–110. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chien KR. Stress pathways and heart failure. Cell. 1999;98:555–558. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80043-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lifton RP, Gharavi AG, Geller DS. Molecular mechanisms of human hypertension. Cell. 2001;104:545–556. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00241-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kane GC, Behfar A, Dyer RB, O'Cochlain DF, Liu XK, Hodgson DM, et al. KCNJ11 gene knockout of the Kir6.2 KATP channel causes maladaptive remodeling and heart failure in hypertension. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15:2285–2297. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Carrasco AJ, Dzeja PP, Alekseev AE, Pucar D, Zingman LV, Abraham MR, et al. Adenylate kinase phosphotransfer communicates cellular energetic signals to ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:7623–7628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121038198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Weiss JN, Yang L, Qu Z. Network perspectives of cardiovascular metabolism. J Lipid Res. 2006;47:2355–2366. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R600023-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Nykter M, Price ND, Aldana M, Ramsey SA, Kauffman SA, Hood LE, et al. Gene expression dynamics in the macrophage exhibit criticality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:1897–1900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711525105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ashrafian H, Watkins H. Cardiomyopathies: therapeutics based on molecular phenotype. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1251–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM, Schneider MD. Unchain my heart: the scientific foundations of cardiac repair. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:572–583. doi: 10.1172/JCI24283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Passier R, van Laake LW, Mummery CL. Stem cell-based therapy and lessons from the heart. Nature. 2008;453:322–329. doi: 10.1038/nature07040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Segers VF, Lee RT. Stem cell therapy for cardiac disease. Nature. 2008;451:937–942. doi: 10.1038/nature06800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Hansson EM, Lindsay ME, Chien KR. Regeneration next: toward heart stem cell therapeutics. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5:364–377. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Nelson TJ, Behfar A, Yamada S, Martinez-Fernandez A, Terzic A. Stem cell platforms for regenerative medicine. Clin Transl Sci. 2009;2:222–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2009.00096.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Anversa P, Kajstura J, Leri A, Bolli R. Life and death of cardiac stem cells: a paradigm shift in cardiac biology. Circulation. 2006;113:1451–1463. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.595181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Torella D, Ellison GM, Méndez-Ferrer S, Ibanez B, Nadal-Ginard B. Resident human cardiac stem cells: role in cardiac cellular homeostasis and potential for myocardial regeneration. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006;3:s8–s13. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kajstura J, Hosoda T, Bearzi C, Rota M, Maestroni S, Urbanek K, et al. The human heart: a self-renewing organ. Clin Transl Sci. 2008;1:80–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2008.00030.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Bergmann O, Bhardwaj RD, Bernard S, Zdunek S, Barnabé-Heider F, Walsh S, et al. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science. 2009;324:98–102. doi: 10.1126/science.1164680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.De Angelis A, Piegari E, Cappetta D, Marino L, Filippelli A, Berrino L, et al. Anthracycline cardiomyopathy is mediated by depletion of the cardiac stem cell pool and is rescued by restoration of progenitor cell function. Circulation. 2010;121:276–292. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.895771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Yamada S, Nelson TJ, Crespo-Diaz RJ, Perez-Terzic C, Liu XK, Miki T, et al. Embryonic stem cell therapy of heart failure in genetic cardiomyopathy. Stem Cells. 2008;26:2644–2653. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hodgson DM, Behfar A, Zingman LV, Kane GC, Perez-Terzic C, Alekseev AE, et al. Stable benefit of embryonic stem cell therapy in myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;287:H471–H479. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01247.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ménard C, Hagège AA, Agbulut O, Barro M, Morichetti MC, Brasselet C, et al. Transplantation of cardiac-committed mouse embryonic stem cells to infarcted sheep myocardium: a preclinical study. Lancet. 2005;366:1005–1012. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67380-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kolossov E, Bostani T, Roell W, Breitbach M, Pillekamp F, Nygren JM, et al. Engraftment of engineered ES cell-derived cardiomyocytes but not BM cells restores contractile function to the infarcted myocardium. J Exp Med. 2006;203:2315–2327. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Chung S, Dzeja PP, Faustino RS, Terzic A. Mitochondrial oxidative metabolism is required for the cardiac differentiation of stem cells. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2007;4:s60–s67. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Chung S, Arrell DK, Faustino RS, Terzic A, Dzeja PP. Glycolytic network restructuring integral to the energetics of embryonic stem cell cardiac differentiation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;48:725–734. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, Dupras SK, et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25:1015–1024. doi: 10.1038/nbt1327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kehat I, Khimovich L, Caspi O, Gepstein A, Shofti R, Arbel G, et al. Electromechanical integration of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:1282–1289. doi: 10.1038/nbt1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Baba S, Heike T, Yoshimoto M, Umeda K, Doi H, Iwasa T, et al. Flk1+ cardiac stem/progenitor cells derived from embryonic stem cells improve cardiac function in a dilated cardiomyopathy mouse model. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;76:119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Behfar A, Perez-Terzic C, Faustino RS, Arrell DK, Hodgson DM, Yamada S, et al. Cardiopoietic programming of embryonic stem cells for tumor-free heart repair. J Exp Med. 2007;204:405–420. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Nelson TJ, Martinez-Fernandez A, Yamada S, Perez-Terzic C, Ikeda Y, Terzic A. Repair of acute myocardial infarction with human stemness factors induced pluirpotent stem cells. Circulation. 2009;120:408–416. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.865154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Yamada S, Kane GC, Behfar A, Liu XK, Dyer RB, Faustino RS, et al. Protection conferred by myocardial ATP-sensitive K+ channels in pressure overload-induced congestive heart failure revealed in KCNJ11 Kir6.2-null mutant. J Physiol. 2006;577:1053–1065. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.119511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


