Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011 Feb 20;14(2):167–173. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.01.007

An expanding universe of small proteins

Errett C Hobbs a, Fanette Fontaine a, Xuefeng Yin b,a, Gisela Storz a,c
PMCID: PMC3079058  NIHMSID: NIHMS272592  PMID: 21342783

Abstract

Historically, small proteins of less than 50 amino acids, in their final processed forms or genetically encoded as such, have been understudied. However, both serendipity and more recent focused efforts have led to the identification of a number of new small proteins in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Increasing evidence demonstrates that small proteins participate in a wide array of cellular processes and exhibit great diversity in their mechanisms of action, yet general principles of small protein function are emerging. This review highlights examples of small proteins that participate in cell signaling, act as antibiotics and toxins, and serve as structural proteins. We also describe additional roles for small proteins in altering membrane fluidity, acting as metal chaperones, and regulating the functions of larger proteins.

Introduction

Small proteins have been understudied, even though the few characterized ones exhibit robust deletion phenotypes and display great diversity in their forms and functions [1*,2,3*,4*,57]. A number of the small proteins discovered to date were uncovered in biochemical studies as components of larger complexes or as processed peptides arising from larger precursors and in genetic screens as suppressor mutations or interacting partners in yeast two-hybrid analyses. These discoveries have prompted more directed bioinformatic and tiling microarray analyses which have revealed a growing number of genes encoding proteins 50 amino acids or less in their original forms, defined here as small proteins (sproteins) [2,8*,9,10]. We use the term peptide for small proteins processed from larger proteins. Genes encoding sproteins have been found as single loci on the chromosome and as parts of operons, and over half of the 60 sproteins detected in E. coli are predicted to contain α-helical transmembrane domains. We summarize what is known about sproteins and peptides and propose additional functions for these proteins inside and outside of the cell.

Secreted peptides as signals

Bacterial communities survive in their natural habitats as a result of their ability to perceive environmental changes and respond accordingly. Secreted peptides derived from neighboring microorganisms of the same or different species form integral parts of these responses. These peptides allow the cell to adapt to new scenarios and confer competitive advantages against other organisms.

At an intraspecies level, secreted small peptides play roles in communication, differentiation, and establishing clonal behaviors. In Bacillus subtilis, ComX (translated as a 55 aa protein, but 10 aa in its active form), acts as a pheromone, stimulating natural competence in response to crowding through activation of the ComP histidine kinase [11]. ComX presumably activates ComP through a direct interaction, but this has yet to be demonstrated. Also in B. subtilis, the sporulation killing factor (Skf) (translated as a 55 aa protein, but a cyclic 26 aa peptide in its active form) is secreted by endospore-forming cells to kill their siblings by an unknown mechanism in a cannibalistic process [12,13**]. In addition, Skf promotes robust biofilm formation [5].

Other small secreted peptides affect interspecies relationships as antimicrobial peptides (Fig. 1). Lantibiotics and circular bacteriocins are representative of the many post-translationally modified antimicrobial peptides secreted by Gram-positive bacteria to limit competition within ecological niches [14]. These compounds can inhibit peptidoglycan synthesis or form pores that depolarize cell membranes [15]. A few secreted antimicrobial peptides like the processed form of nisin in Lactococcus lactis (57 aa cleaved to 34 aa) have a dual role and also serve as intercellular signals between sibling cells [16,17].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Small secreted proteins exhibit diversity in their three-dimensional structures and can contain unique intramolecular linkages or modified amino acids. For example, the mature form of (a) subtilosin (PDB: 1PXQ) is cyclized in a head-to-tail fashion and contains three unique linkages between cysteine sulfur atoms and α-carbons of phenylalanine and threonine. In contrast, (b) leucocin A (PDB: 1CW6) has a single disulfide bond [43,44].

Some small proteins play integral roles in host-pathogen interactions. The phenol soluble modulin (PSM) peptides secreted by various Staphylococcus species are involved in both promoting and inhibiting pathogenesis. S. aureus PSM peptides induce the lysis of human neutrophils and are major virulence determinants; in fact, the increased production of PSM peptides probably contributes to the enhanced virulence of Community Associated-MRSA as compared to Healthcare Associated-MRSA [7]. In contrast, PSM gamma toxins secreted by Staphylococci epidermis cooperate with host-derived antimicrobial peptides of the innate immune system to reduce survival of a Streptococcus group A strain, an important human pathogen [18*].

Secreted peptides are probably the most extensively studied class of small proteins; however, it is likely that many more are undiscovered. Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) shows great promise in illuminating the full complement of secreted proteins [13**]. In IMS, bacteria are incubated directly on a MALDI mass spectrometry plate containing growth media. The metabolites secreted by the bacteria are subsequently identified. This technique was recently applied to identify the mature forms of the B. subtilis SkfA and SdpC cannibalism toxins [13**]. Since distinct populations of cells can be grown next to one another, IMS can also be employed to discover bioactive molecules secreted by one species in response to the presence of another.

Small proteins as toxins

The toxins of type I toxin-antitoxin modules are a particularly mysterious class of sproteins. They tend to have a highly hydrophobic α-helical transmembrane domain followed by a small C-terminal region rich in aromatic or polar residues, reminiscent of the phage holins [19]. These toxin characteristics are shared by antimicrobial peptides, but there is no evidence that type I toxins are secreted. Instead, one of the toxins has been shown to co-fractionate with the inner membrane [20]. While type I toxins kill the cell when overproduced, synthesis from their corresponding mRNAs is tightly regulated by cis-encoded small regulatory RNA (sRNA) antitoxins. Most toxin deletion mutants have no phenotype, and yet these genes are widespread through Firmicutes and Enterobacteriaceae, suggesting they serve conserved but undiscovered functions [21*].

In E. coli, the overexpression of the type I toxin genes hok, srnB, pndA, fst, ibsC, tisB, ldrD, and shoB leads to common global effects such nucleoid compaction, membrane depolarization, or membrane disruption (unpublished data) [20,22]. However, microarray data as well as differences in the kinetics of cell death suggest that type I toxins exhibit individual specificities in their mechanisms of action [22]. Little is known about the physiological roles that small toxins serve, but the SOS-induced TisB has been implicated in forming “persistent” subpopulations that are resistant to DNA-damaging antibiotics like ciprofloxacin [23]. More generally, type I toxins might allow bacterial populations to slow the metabolism of a fraction of cells under conditions of stress, thereby increasing their survivability, until conditions are more favorable for growth. Cells may also induce toxins as a form of programmed cell death to limit the propagation of phage infections. In addition or alternatively, type I toxin-antitoxin systems could play a role in chromosome maintenance, ensuring that regions immediately adjacent to toxin loci are not lost under non-selective growth conditions [24].

Small proteins as membrane components

A longstanding problem in biology is understanding how proteins are targeted to subcellular compartments. Most proteins in bacteria are localized by the presence of other proteins. However, at some point one of these proteins has to recognize fundamental physical features that make a cellular address unique. The amphipathic α-helical sprotein SpoVM (26 aa) from B. subtilis serves such a function and recognizes positive (convex) membrane curvature, acting as a cue for the deposition of the endospore coat [25**]. Moreover, SpoVM also tethers the endospore coat to the developing forespore. SpoVM most likely is too small to sense membrane curvature as a monomer, but rather forms higher order complexes that bind to convex surfaces.

We postulate additional roles for sproteins in detecting membrane features or even in modulating cell membrane thickness or fluidity to respond to changing environmental conditions. For instance, a membrane-spanning sprotein with an especially high affinity for phospholipids might be induced in response to cold shock to affect membrane fluidity. Remodeling the cell envelope through alterations in lipid composition is a time-consuming process, requiring transcriptional reprogramming and protein synthesis followed by the manufacture, trafficking, and insertion of new lipid moieties. One can imagine that the synthesis and membrane insertion of an sprotein would be less time- and energy-intensive. In addition to altering membrane fluidity, small single transmembrane domain proteins could aggregate and form structures reminiscent of lipid rafts, recruiting or tethering larger proteins to specific subcellular addresses.

Small proteins as chaperones of metals and nucleic acids

Although sproteins are probably too small to act as enzymes per se, they may facilitate cellular processes by presenting substrates and cofactors in a state that is accessible to other entities. For example, there is evidence that B. subtilis employs the small basic proteins FbpA (59 aa), FbpB (53 aa), and FbpC (29 aa) to promote interactions between the small regulatory RNA FsrA and its mRNA targets and thereby maintain iron homeostasis [26]. In E. coli, MntS (42 aa), binds to and is hypothesized to deliver manganese to other proteins [27]. In addition to acting as chaperones, sproteins could be involved in coordinating metal-containing compounds in larger complexes. For example, the paralogous YbgT and YccB proteins in E coli are encoded in cytochrome oxidase operons and contain conserved cysteine residues within their transmembrane domains that could coordinate heme groups in cytochrome oxidases [8*].

Other sproteins could play an opposite role by repackaging substrates to make them inaccessible to the cell. For instance, it is well established that slightly larger basic proteins (~60–80 aa) repackage and render DNA UV-resistant during endospore formation in Bacillus species, and redox active metals like iron are sequestered by Dps (167 aa) and ferritins (~160 aa) [28]. It seems reasonable that sproteins could play similar roles in organisms faced with long periods of dormancy and extreme environmental conditions.

Small proteins as stabilizing factors for larger protein complexes

Macromolecular machines play central roles in the cell, conducting fundamental processes such as protein synthesis, cell division, photosynthesis, solute flux, and cell signaling. A number of sproteins participate in the assembly or maintenance of cellular complexes integral to these pathways. For example, highly conserved sproteins found in both plants and cyanobacteria are integral components of photosystems I and II. The cytochrome b6f complex in Synechocystis PCC 6803 contains four sproteins: PetG (37 aa), PetL (32 aa), PetM (35 aa), and PetN (29 aa) [6,29]. PetG and PetN are essential for the stability of the complex, PetM is thought to have a regulatory role, and PetL has no known function (Fig. 2A) [6,29]. In E. coli, KdpF (29 aa) stabilizes the KdpABC potassium transporter in vitro [30]. It is unknown how AcrZ (49 aa) impacts antibiotic efflux mediated by AcrAB-TolC, but an attractive hypothesis is that it stabilizes formation of AcrB trimers in the membrane [31]. We expect that as biochemical methodologies for the detection of sproteins improve, others will be found to serve as stabilizing factors in larger protein complexes.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Small proteins (shown in red) interact with integral membrane proteins in a number of different ways. (a) PetG and PetN are transmembrane proteins that associate with the periphery of the cytochrome b6f complex (PDB: 2E74) and are required for its stabilization in Synechocystis PCC 6803 [6,45]. PetM is thought to have a regulatory role [29]. (b) Sda forms a complex with the soluble portion of KinB (PDB: 3D36) to block the initiation of endospore formation in Bacillus species [46].

Small proteins as regulators

Small proteins are also induced to modulate a number of different pathways by interacting with proteins of various functions. For example, in E. coli, SgrT (43 aa) inhibits glucose import through the PtsG transporter [32], while MciZ (40 aa) binds to FtsZ and inhibits its GTPase activity to prevent the formation of aberrant Z-rings during endospore formation in B. subtilis [3]. The sproteins could also alter ribosome function during adaptation to stress conditions. An example of this may be found in E. coli where a sprotein paralogous to the L36 ribosomal protein, YkgO (46 aa), is synthesized upon zinc limitation, perhaps to alleviate the requirement for zinc when L36 is part of the ribosome [33].

Several sproteins have been described that promote or inhibit the regulated proteolysis of other proteins. For example, degradation of the MgtC virulence factor by FtsH protease is promoted by MgtR (30 aa) in Salmonella enterica [1]. Many proteins subject to regulated proteolysis are recognized by their cognate protease only when they are in complex with a specialized adaptor protein. Small antiadaptor proteins are induced by cells to competitively inhibit the activities of adaptor proteins. For example, synthesis of the ComS antiadaptor protein (46 aa) is induced in response to accumulation of ComX peptide by B. subtilis to allow transcription factors to accumulate and direct changes in gene activation [34].

One final group of sproteins regulates the activities of histidine kinases. Sda (46 aa) is synthesized by Bacillus species in response to DNA damage and inhibits endospore formation by preventing the autophosphorylation of an initiator kinase (Fig. 2B) [35]. In E. coli, MgrB (47 aa) participates in a negative feedback loop to inactivate PhoQP through direct interaction with PhoQ histidine kinase [36**]. Other sprotein regulators that act in similar as well as in novel ways, perhaps by altering the DNA-binding capacity of a transcription factor or by altering the specificity of a membrane transporter, are likely to be discovered.

Applications

Small proteins have immediate and future applications. The lantibiotic nisin, a small secreted antimicrobial peptide, has been used extensively as a food preservative for more than 20 years. Antimicrobial peptides have also been assayed for diverse medical applications in humans such as therapies against cancers as well as bacteria resistant to multiple antibiotics [3739]. Surprisingly, subtilosin, which has been proposed as a treatment for bacterial vaginosis, inhibits the motility of human spermatozoa and may have additional use as a spermicide (Fig. 1) [40].

In addition to being developed as antimicrobial agents themselves, small hydrophobic peptides may also have potential as highly specific vehicles for drug delivery. Very often, drugs are effective only if they target specific cell types. They usually must also penetrate the cell membrane. sproteins show promise in addressing these problems. For example, the synthetic pHLIP (pH Low Insertion Peptide) has been employed to target the cell impermeable toxin phalloidin to tumors [37]. Under the slightly acidic conditions associated with certain cancers, pHLIP inserts into membranes as a transmembrane α-helix, carrying the conjugated phalloidin moiety into the cytoplasm where it is released to kill the cell [37]. Finally, applications could be derived from characterizing the abilities of sproteins to modulate regulatory networks. This knowledge could be employed to rewire regulatory networks, selectively boosting metabolic pathways responsible for the production of economically valuable metabolites or the consumption of hazardous waste.

Perspectives

As is the case with sRNAs, sproteins largely have been missed or ignored in genome annotations. However, improved bioinformatic and biochemical approaches should facilitate the discovery of many more sproteins on bacterial as well as bacteriophage chromosomes. Global genomic analysis will also indicate how widely distributed sproteins are in all genomes and address other questions. Does the distribution of sproteins vary with the lifestyle or habitat of a bacterium? How do genes encoding sproteins arise, and do they evolve more quickly or more slowly than larger proteins? Many of the techniques currently used to characterize and identify sRNAs should be broadly applicable to studies that address these questions.

Our definition of a sprotein as being less than 50-amino-acids-long is arbitrary, and other slightly larger proteins serve similar interesting functions. For instance, while MgrB (described above) can inactivate a histidine kinase [36**], SafA (65 aa) is induced in E. coli by one two-component system to activate another and thereby connect the activation of disparate signaling pathways [41]. B. subtilis employs anti-σ factors like Fin (76 aa) and Gin (64 aa) to switch between different σ-factors as endospore formation progresses [42]. It is becoming clear that sproteins can serve in any one of a number of functions, and the discovery and elucidation of others will further illuminate the unique roles they play in the cell.

Table.

Functions of small proteins in bacteriaa

Name Lengthb Organismc Predicted transmembrane domain and other biochemical propertiesd Proposed functions Reference
Secreted signal peptides
ComX 55 (5–10) B. subtilis No; isoprenyl-modified at tryptophan Quorum sensing signal that stimulates competence [11]
SkfA 55 (26) B. subtilis No; modified with disulfide bond and cyclized Cannibalism factor [5,12,13]
Nisin 57 (34) L. lactis No; dehydrated at serines and threonines and cyclized Antimicrobial peptide [15]
PSM 44 S. aureus, S.epidermis No Induces lysis of leukocytes, modulates host immune response [7,18*]

Membrane components
SpoVM 26 B. subtilis Amphipathic α-helix Recognizes positive membrane curvature [25**]

Metal and nucleic acids chaperones
FbpC 29 B. subtilis No Assists function of small regulatory RNA FsrA in iron- sparing response [26]
MntS 42 E. coli No Binds manganese and maintains manganese homeostasis [27]

Stabilizing factors
PetG 38 Synechocystis sp. Yes Promotes assembly and/or stability of cytochrome b6-f complex [6]
PetN 29 Synechocystis sp. Yes Promotes assembly and/or stability of cytochrome b6-f complex [6]
KdpF 29 E. coli Yes Stabilizes K+-translocating P- type ATPase KdpFABC [30]
AcrZ 49 E. coli Yes Associates with AcrAB-TolC multidrug efflux pump [31]

Regulators
SgrT 43 E. coli No Inhibits activity of glucose transporter PtsG [32]
MciZ 40 B. subtilis No Inhibits GTPase activity of tubulin-like protein FtsZ [3*]
Sda 46 B. subtilis No Inhibits autophosphorylation of histidine kinase KinA [35]
MgrB 47 E. coli Yes Inhibits histidine kinase PhoQ in feedback loop [36**]
MgtR 30 S. typhimurium Yes Modulates membrane-bound AAA+ protease FtsH [1*]
a

Small toxins are not included in this table. For a comprehensive review about small toxins see [19].

b

Number of amino acids in full length form (number of amino acids in active form, if applicable).

c

The organisms listed in this table are limited to those in which the function of the small protein has been studied experimentally.

d

TM domain is predicted by TMHMM (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of NICHD and a fellowship from the Pharmacology Research Associate Training program of NIGMS (E.C.H.). We thank A.B. Blanc-Potard, M. Goulian, M.R. Hemm, D.B. Kearns, M.T. Laub, K.S. Ramamurthi, and members of the Storz lab for helpful comments and discussions.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

Errett C. Hobbs, Email: hobbserr@mail.nih.gov.

Fanette Fontaine, Email: fontainf@mail.nih.gov.

Xuefeng Yin, Email: yinx@mail.nih.gov.

References

  • 1*.Alix E, Blanc-Potard AB. Peptide-assisted degradation of the Salmonella MgtC virulence factor. EMBO J. 2008;27:546–557. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601983. MgtC is a conserved virulence factor that is subject to extensive transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation. The authors of this paper show that the MgtR sprotein promotes the regulated proteolysis of MgtC by FtsH. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alix E, Blanc-Potard AB. Hydrophobic peptides: novel regulators within bacterial membrane. Mol Microbiol. 2009;72:5–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06626.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3*.Handler AA, Lim JE, Losick R. Peptide inhibitor of cytokinesis during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68:588–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06173.x. Handler and colleagues describe how an FtsZ-interacting sprotein, MciZ, prevents the aberrant formation of divisional septa during endospore formation. Biochemical and genetic evidence suggest that MciZ interferes with FtsZ polymerization. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4*.Hobbs EC, Astarita JL, Storz G. Small RNAs and small proteins involved in resistance to cell envelope stress and acid shock in Escherichia coli: analysis of a bar-coded mutant collection. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:59–67. doi: 10.1128/JB.00873-09. DNA barcodes were employed to identify a range of sensitivity and resistance phenotypes associated with sprotein gene deletion mutants. This collection can be screened under virtually any stress condition for additional phenotypes that should provide springboards for sprotein characterization. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lopez D, Vlamakis H, Losick R, Kolter R. Cannibalism enhances biofilm development in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74:609–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06882.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schneider D, Volkmer T, Rogner M. PetG and PetN, but not PetL, are essential subunits of the cytochrome b6f complex from Synechocystis PCC 6803. Res Microbiol. 2007;158:45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2006.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang R, Braughton KR, Kretschmer D, Bach TH, Queck SY, Li M, Kennedy AD, Dorward DW, Klebanoff SJ, Peschel A, et al. Identification of novel cytolytic peptides as key virulence determinants for community-associated MRSA. Nat Med. 2007;13:1510–1514. doi: 10.1038/nm1656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8*.Hemm MR, Paul BJ, Schneider TD, Storz G, Rudd KE. Small membrane proteins found by comparative genomics and ribosome binding site models. Mol Microbiol. 2008;70:1487–1501. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06495.x. Hemm and colleagues employed two bioinformatics approaches to annotate genes encoding sproteins in E. coli. Synthesis of these sproteins was verified by immunoblot analyses with sprotein-epitope fusions. These methodologies can be applied to annotating sprotein-encoding genes in other bacteria. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ibrahim M, Nicolas P, Bessieres P, Bolotin A, Monnet V, Gardan R. A genome-wide survey of short coding sequences in Streptococci. Microbiology. 2007;153:3631–3644. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/006205-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Schmalisch M, Maiques E, Nikolov L, Camp AH, Chevreux B, Muffler A, Rodriguez S, Perkins J, Losick R. Small genes under sporulation control in the Bacillus subtilis genome. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:5402–5412. doi: 10.1128/JB.00534-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lopez D, Vlamakis H, Losick R, Kolter R. Paracrine signaling in a bacterium. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1631–1638. doi: 10.1101/gad.1813709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gonzalez-Pastor JE, Hobbs EC, Losick R. Cannibalism by sporulating bacteria. Science. 2003;301:510–513. doi: 10.1126/science.1086462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13**.Liu WT, Yang YL, Xu Y, Lamsa A, Haste NM, Yang JY, Ng J, Gonzalez D, Ellermeier CD, Straight PD, et al. Imaging mass spectrometry of intraspecies metabolic exchange revealed the cannibalistic factors of Bacillus subtilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:16286–16290. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008368107. This paper describes a unique approach using mass spectrometry for the identification of molecules secreted by bacteria grown on solid surfaces. The approach allowed the authors to map where molecules were secreted in relation to the bacterial colonies. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stein T. Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56:845–857. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bauer R, Dicks LM. Mode of action of lipid II-targeting lantibiotics. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;101:201–216. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Diep DB, Straume D, Kjos M, Torres C, Nes IF. An overview of the mosaic bacteriocin pln loci from Lactobacillus plantarum. Peptides. 2009;30:1562–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kuipers OP, Beerthuyzen MM, de Ruyter PG, Luesink EJ, de Vos WM. Autoregulation of nisin biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis by signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:27299–27304. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.45.27299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18*.Cogen AL, Yamasaki K, Muto J, Sanchez KM, Crotty Alexander L, Tanios J, Lai Y, Kim JE, Nizet V, Gallo RL. Staphylococcus epidermidis antimicrobial δ-toxin (phenol-soluble modulin-γ) cooperates with host antimicrobial peptides to kill group A Streptococcus. PLoS One. 2010;5:e8557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008557. Different host antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) often act synergistically to kill pathogenic organisms. The authors present evidence that S. epidermidis δ-toxin limits the survival of pathogenic group A Streptococcus by binding to and enhancing the activities of host AMPs. Additionally, δ-toxin causes neutrophils to produce neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), structures composed of insoluble DNA, histones, and AMPs that have been suggested to trap and kill pathogens. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fozo EM, Hemm MR, Storz G. Small toxic proteins and the antisense RNAs that repress them. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008;72:579–589. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00025-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Unoson C, Wagner EG. A small SOS-induced toxin is targeted against the inner membrane in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2008;70:258–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06416.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21*.Fozo EM, Makarova KS, Shabalina SA, Yutin N, Koonin EV, Storz G. Abundance of type I toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria: searches for new candidates and discovery of novel families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:3743–3759. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq054. Type I toxin-antitoxin systems historically were associated with plasmids. Fozo et al. employed exhaustive BLAST searches and searches based on characteristics of known type I toxin-antitoxin systems to identify chromosomally encoded systems in a wide variety of bacteria. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fozo EM, Kawano M, Fontaine F, Kaya Y, Mendieta KS, Jones KL, Ocampo A, Rudd KE, Storz G. Repression of small toxic protein synthesis by the Sib and OhsC small RNAs. Mol Microbiol. 2008;70:1076–1093. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06394.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dorr T, Vulic M, Lewis K. Ciprofloxacin causes persister formation by inducing the TisB toxin in Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Silvaggi JM, Perkins JB, Losick R. Small untranslated RNA antitoxin in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:6641–6650. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.19.6641-6650.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25**.Ramamurthi KS, Lecuyer S, Stone HA, Losick R. Geometric cue for protein localization in a bacterium. Science. 2009;323:1354–1357. doi: 10.1126/science.1169218. This is the first paper to describe a bacterial protein that can recognize unique topological features of cell membranes and, on this basis alone, localize to a specific subcellular address. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gaballa A, Antelmann H, Aguilar C, Khakh SK, Song KB, Smaldone GT, Helmann JD. The Bacillus subtilis iron-sparing response is mediated by a Fur-regulated small RNA and three small, basic proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:11927–11932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711752105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Waters LS, Storz G. Expanding the pathways of manganese homeostasis: role of a small manganese chaperone protein, MntS. PLoS Genet. 2010 (submitted) [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bellapadrona G, Ardini M, Ceci P, Stefanini S, Chiancone E. Dps proteins prevent Fenton-mediated oxidative damage by trapping hydroxyl radicals within the protein shell. Free Radic Biol Med. 2010;48:292–297. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.10.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schneider D, Berry S, Rich P, Seidler A, Rogner M. A regulatory role of the PetM subunit in a cyanobacterial cytochrome b6f complex. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:16780–16785. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009503200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gassel M, Mollenkamp T, Puppe W, Altendorf K. The KdpF subunit is part of the K+-translocating Kdp complex of Escherichia coli and is responsible for stabilization of the complex in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:37901–37907. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.53.37901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hobbs EC, Paul BJ, Astarita JL, Storz G. A conserved small protein, AcrZ, associates with the AcrB efflux pump and is required for antibiotic resistance in. Escherichia coli. 2010 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210093109. (in preparation) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wadler CS, Vanderpool CK. A dual function for a bacterial small RNA: SgrS performs base pairing-dependent regulation and encodes a functional polypeptide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:20454–20459. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708102104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hemm MR, Paul BJ, Miranda-Rios J, Zhang A, Soltanzad N, Storz G. Small stress response proteins in Escherichia coli: proteins missed by classical proteomic studies. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:46–58. doi: 10.1128/JB.00872-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Prepiak P, Dubnau D. A peptide signal for adapter protein-mediated degradation by the AAA+ protease ClpCP. Mol Cell. 2007;26:639–647. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cunningham KA, Burkholder WF. The histidine kinase inhibitor Sda binds near the site of autophosphorylation and may sterically hinder autophosphorylation and phosphotransfer to Spo0F. Mol Microbiol. 2009;71:659–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36**.Lippa AM, Goulian M. Feedback inhibition in the PhoQ/PhoP signaling system by a membrane peptide. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000788. The authors show that the sprotein MgrB participates in a negative feedback loop to inactivate the PhoQ-PhoP signal transduction pathway. MgrB may be representative of a class of sproteins involved in modulating cell signaling pathways. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Andreev OA, Engelman DM, Reshetnyak YK. pH-sensitive membrane peptides (pHLIPs) as a novel class of delivery agents. Mol Membr Biol. 2010;27:341–352. doi: 10.3109/09687688.2010.509285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.De Kwaadsteniet M, Doeschate KT, Dicks LM. Nisin F in the treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;48:65–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02488.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fernández L, Delgado S, Herrero H, Maldonado A, Rodríguez JM. The bacteriocin nisin, an effective agent for the treatment of Staphylococcal mastitis during lactation. J Hum Lact. 2008;24:311–316. doi: 10.1177/0890334408317435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sutyak KE, Anderson RA, Dover SE, Feathergill KA, Aroutcheva AA, Faro S, Chikindas ML. Spermicidal activity of the safe natural antimicrobial peptide subtilosin. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2008;2008:540758. doi: 10.1155/2008/540758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Eguchi Y, Itou J, Yamane M, Demizu R, Yamato F, Okada A, Mori H, Kato A, Utsumi R. B1500; a small membrane protein, connects the two-component systems EvgS/EvgA and PhoQ/PhoP in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:18712–18717. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705768104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Camp AH, Wang AF, Losick R. A small protein required for the switch from σF to σG during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2010;193:116–124. doi: 10.1128/JB.00949-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kawulka KE, Sprules T, Diaper CM, Whittal RM, McKay RT, Mercier P, Zuber P, Vederas JC. Structure of subtilosin A, a cyclic antimicrobial peptide from Bacillus subtilis with unusual sulfur to α-carbon cross-links: formation and reduction of α-thio-α-amino acid derivatives. Biochemistry. 2004;43:3385–3395. doi: 10.1021/bi0359527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wang Y, Henz ME, Gallagher NL, Chai S, Gibbs AC, Yan LZ, Stiles ME, Wishart DS, Vederas JC. Solution structure of carnobacteriocin B2 and implications for structure-activity relationships among type IIa bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria. Biochemistry. 1999;38:15438–15447. doi: 10.1021/bi991351x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yamashita E, Zhang H, Cramer WA. Structure of the cytochrome b6f complex: quinone analogue inhibitors as ligands of heme cn. J Mol Biol. 2007;370:39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bick MJ, Lamour V, Rajashankar KR, Gordiyenko Y, Robinson CV, Darst SA. How to switch off a histidine kinase: crystal structure of Geobacillus stearothermophilus KinB with the inhibitor Sda. J Mol Biol. 2009;386:163–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES