Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int Immunopharmacol. 2010 Nov 24;11(5):593–596. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2010.11.005

3G11 expression in CD4+ T cell-mediated autoimmunity and immune tolerance

Fang Zhou 1, Guang-Xian Zhang 1, Abdolmohamad Rostami 1
PMCID: PMC3079069  NIHMSID: NIHMS251310  PMID: 21084064

Abstract

3G11 is a sialylated carbohydrate epitope of the disialoganglioside molecule expressed on mouse CD4+ T cells. Recent research showed that 3G11 expression is related to the modulation of T cell function, i.e., 3G11 T cells exhibit anergic/Treg characteristics and efficiently inhibit autoimmunity in the central nervous system. The relationship between 3G11 expression and immune tolerance is summarized in this literature review.

Keywords: 3G11, regulatory T cells, T helper cells, autoimmunity, peripheral tolerance

1. Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and its animal model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), are chronic inflammatory demyelinating diseases resulting from an autoimmune reaction against CNS myelin [1]. The etiology of MS is unknown; however, its symptoms become evident following the infiltration of peripherally activated myelin-reactive T cells into the CNS. Subsequently these cells are presented with myelin antigens and become activated/reactivated, thereby triggering an immunologic cascade that results in myelin damage. This process occurs in the initial phase of the disease and continues to some extent during the chronic and relapse phases [13]. In the CNS, autoreactive T cells and antigen presenting cells (APCs), including activated microglia and astrocytes, as well as infiltrating macrophages and dendritic cells, produce proinflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-17, and IL-23, and promote cell-mediated immunity in the CNS [46]. Conversely, immunoregulatory cytokines IL-4, IL-10, TGF-β and IL-27 may be protective [69]. In spite of extensive research to develop pharmacotherapeutic agents to reduce myelin damage, only a few therapies are available, e.g., IFN-β, glatiramer acetate (GA) and mitoxantrone, all with potential side effects and only mild to moderate efficacy [10,11].

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been defined as CD4+ T cells that inhibit immunopathology or autoimmune disease in vivo [12,13]. Thus far two major Treg populations have been described: naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ Tregs (nTregs) and adaptive (induced) Tregs (iTregs). Naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ Tregs are generated in the thymus and represent 5–10% of CD4+ T lymphocytes in healthy adult mice and humans. These cells constitutively express the forkhead/winged helix transcription factor Foxp3, and have a specialized role in controlling both the innate and the adaptive immune system [14,15]. It has also been found that CD4+CD25+ Tregs can be converted from CD4+CD25 cells in vitro [9,16] and in vivo [17]. Tregs play an important role in immune tolerance and anti-inflammation [1822].

Immune tolerance can be divided into central tolerance and peripheral tolerance [23]. Auto-reactive T cells that target self-antigen can be depleted through negative selection in the thymus so that autoimmune responses induced by auto-reactive T cells can be avoided [24]. Nevertheless, some auto-reactive T cells can migrate to the local environment. The activity of these T cells can be inhibited by antigen presenting cells such as dendritic cells (DCs) and by Tregs, resulting in peripheral tolerance [2429].

The molecular mechanisms of immune tolerance have not been fully elucidated. It is known that certain co-stimulatory molecules expressed on DCs, such as CD80, CD86 and other B7-family members including B7-H1, -H2, -H3, -H4 and B7-DC, can bind to specific ligands expressed on T cells and lead to apoptosis of auto-reactive T cells [30,31]. In addition, Tregs can secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 to induce T cell anergy [29,32,33]. However, there are few markers to identify anergic T cells. It has been reported that 3G11 is a molecule whose expression is related to induction of T cell anergy.

2.3G11 expression on T cells

The 3G11 antigen, originally defined by the monoclonal antibody SM3G11, is a molecule that has been identified as a sialylated carbohydrate antigen expressed on the disialoganglioside, IV(NeuAc)2-GgOse4Cer [34]. The 3G11 molecule is expressed on both thymocytes and peripheral T cells, predominantly on the membranes of CD4+ T cells, but is not found on non-T cells [35]. 3G11+ T cells stimulated by mitogen produced a large amount of IL-2. In contrast, 3G11 T cells did not produce IL-2; they were enriched for a CD45RBlo/−, L-selectin and CD44hi phenotype as compared to the 3G11+ subsets, indicating an activated/ memory T cell phenotype, and were capable of IL-4 production upon anti-CD3 stimulation [36]. Thus, we hypothesized that the level of 3G11 expression might reflect the functional state of CD4+ T cells in autoimmune disease, and could be a cell surface marker for the anergic state. In our previous studies we tested this possibility in autoantigen-induced i.v. tolerance in MBP TCR transgenic mice with EAE. Our data suggest that 3G11 expression can be downregulated by the induction of tolerance, and that loss of the 3G11 molecule on autoantigen-reactive CD4+ T cells represents an anergic/Treg state of these cells. These data encourage us to further characterize 3G11 T cells, to study their role in tolerance, and to explore the possibility that 3G11 T cells might be a unique cell population of anergic Tregs in autoimmune diseases [37,38].

Greene et al. investigated the expression of 6C10 and 3G11, which are surface markers of CD4+ T cells. Their results showed that 6C10lo3G11lo CD4+ T cells express low levels of CD45RB and CD62L. 6C103G11lo CD4+ T cells may represent an anergic state by an unknown mechanism [39]. Additionally, Weigle et al. investigated the difference of CD45RB, PgP-1 and 3G11 expression on CD4+ T cells. Their results showed that the majority of CD4+ T cells in young mice are 3G11+CD45RBhiPgP-1lo phenotype. Reduction of 3G11 expression is related to a low level of CD45RB expression and a high level of PgP-1 expression. In contrast, the majority of CD4+ T cells in aged mice are 3G11loCD45RBloPgP-1hi. These results indicate that the function of 3G11 CD4+ T cells could be different from that of 3G11+ CD4+ T cells, given that they produced different cytokines: 3G11+CD4+ T cells produced IL-2, while 3G11CCD4+ T cells generated IL-4. These results suggest that 3G11+ and 3G11CD4+ T cells may regulate different immune responses mediated by IL-2 and IL-4, respectively [36]. In addition, these results are consistent with those of Hayakawa et al., showing that IL-4 was produced by a 3G11 subset with a CD45RB, lectin and CD44hi phenotype and that IL-4 producing 3G11 CD4+ T cells were not typical Th2 cells [34,36].

3.3G11 Tregs can be induced by intravenous (i.v.) tolerance

Zhang et al. recently defined the correlation between 3G11 expression on MBP-specific T cells and i.v. tolerance induction against EAE. Mice transgenic for a TCR specific for the Ac1–11 peptide of myelin basic protein (MBP1–11) immunized to induce EAE and MBP1–11 peptide were i.v. injected to induce tolerance. While the clinical disease was significantly suppressed, 3G11 expression on CD4+19G+ cells (MBP-reactive T cells) was dramatically decreased in central and peripheral immune organs and the CNS. In lymph nodes, 72.2% of CD4+19G+ cells of PBS-i.v. mice expressed 3G11, whereas this percentage was 31.5 in MBP1–11-i.v. mice. Similar results were shown in spleen and spinal cord. In the thymus, a similar level of 3G11 expression was found at the CD48 stage, and 3G11 expression was dramatically down-regulated on CD4+8+ cells (70.6% in PBS i. v. mice vs. 12.7% in MBP1–11-i.v. mice). 3G11 CD4+ T cells can secrete large amounts of IL-10, but cannot produce IL-2 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). In contrast, 3G11+ CD4+ T cells produced IL-2 and IFN-γ, but did not secrete IL-10. Moreover, 3G11CD4+ T cells inhibited proliferation of antigen-reactive T cells, which play an important role in EAE induction. In contrast, 3G11+CD4+ T cells did not affect proliferation of effector CD4+ T cells. The results of adoptive transfer studies showed that 3G11CD4+ T cells suppressed EAE induction while transfer of 3G11+CD4+ T cells had no effect on inhibition of EAE development. These results suggest that 3G11CD4+ T cells can be used in immunotherapy in for EAE in future clinical trials [37].

4. Correlation among naturally occurring 3G11, Foxp3, and CD4+CD25+ nTregs

To test the hypothesis that 3G11 T cells represent a naturally occurring Treg (nTreg) population, Zhao et al. [37,38] determined Foxp3 expression on 3G11 T cells vs. 3G11+ T cells prepared from spleen of naïve C57BL/6 mice. While only 4.1 ± 0.5% of 3G11+CD4+ T cells expressed Foxp3, 34.9 ± 1.5% of 3G11CD4+ T cells were Foxp3+. These cells produced a large amount of IL-10 and significantly suppressed proliferative responses of effector T cells in vitro. These results indicate that the 3G11 population is enriched in Foxp3+ Treg cells.

Furthermore, the lack of 3G11 expression overlaps to a great extent with CD25 (CD25+3G11) expression. While only 9.5% of CD25 T cells were 3G11, in CD25+ T cells the percentage of 3G11 was 54.4. Similarly, only 3.5% of 3G11+ T cells were CD25+ but 29.4% of 3G11 T cells were CD25+. The highest percentage of Foxp3-expressing cells was found in CD25+3G11 T cells (nTregs) and the lowest percentage in CD253G11+ cells, indicating effector T cells. An intermediate percentage of Foxp3+ cells was observed in CD25+3G11+ and CD253G11 cells, both of which exhibited lower immunoregulatory capacity than CD25+3G11 T cells. As expected, CD25+3G11 T cells expressed the highest levels of Foxp3 and IL-10 and most efficiently inhibited mitogenic and antigen-specific immune responses in vitro and clinical EAE in vivo. They concluded that 3G11, combined with CD25 expression (CD25+3G11), defines a cell surface phenotype of a highly potent Treg subpopulation [37,38].

5. Targeting 3G11 on CD4+ T cells alters the balance between Treg and Th17 cells and suppresses EAE

Given that 3G11+ T cells play an important role in inflammatory responses, anti-3G11 mAb was used to inhibit 3G11+ T cell-mediated autoimmune disease. For example, anti-3G11 mAb has been shown to inhibit induction of EAE at an early stage and to suppress disease development at a later stage. Also, the number of effector CD4+ T cells that can induce EAE was decreased after injection of anti-3G11 mAb in vivo. Interestingly, the results showed that there was an increase in 3G11 CD4+ T cells, but a decrease in 3G11+CD4+ T cells. Moreover, proliferation assays indicated that MOG-primed T lymphocyte proliferative responses were significantly inhibited after treatment with anti-3G11 antibody, leading to MOG-primed T lymphocyte apoptosis. In addition, Th1 and Th17-associated cytokine secretion was also suppressed by anti-3G11 antibody. These results suggest that anti-3G11 antibody can block effector T cell generation and their immune function in vivo [40].

Interestingly, anti-3G11 antibody does not suppress EAE in IL-10−/− mice [40], which suggests that anti-3G11 antibody treatment-induced inhibition of EAE is IL-10-dependent; however, the mechanism has not been fully elucidated. Experimental results showed that only CD4+CD25+FoxP3+IL-10+3G11 Tregs inhibited EAE induction in vivo while CD4+3G11+ T cells did not protect mice from EAE, demonstrating that CD4+3G11+ T cells are effectors and CD4+3G11 T cells are Tregs with CD25 and FoxP3 positive expression. Furthermore, the results showed that the lack of 3G11 expression is a biological feature of anergic T cells, suggesting that this may be a useful marker of anergic/Treg subpopulations in vivo [37,38].

6. Conclusion

In summary, the above studies indicated that loss of 3G11 expression on CD4+ T cells might be a novel marker for Tregs. While a positive correlation has been observed between 3G11 and CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs, the relationship between this marker and other possible markers of Tregs (Table 1) remains to be defined. It is also necessary to undertake further studies to investigate the molecular mechanisms of 3G11 that regulate T cell activation in vivo so that an immunotherapy using CD4+3G11 Tregs to target autoimmune diseases can be developed in the future.

Table 1.

Surface markers of regulatory CD4+ T cells

Surface markers Expression /function References
CD25 IL-2 receptor α chain that is expressed on naturally occurring Tregs and activated T lymphocytes. [4144]
CD127 A type I cytokine receptor that interacts with CD132 to form IL-7 receptor; its expression is down-regulated on CD4+CD25+ Tregs. [4549]
CD122 IL-2 receptor β chain that interacts with CD25 and CD132 to form high affinity of IL-2 receptor. [5053]
3G11 A sialylated carbohydrate antigen that is primarily expressed on CD4+ T cells. Loss of 3G11 on CD4+ T cells leads to an anergic/Treg phenotype. [35,37,38,40]
Glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related (GITR) protein One of the TNF receptor super-family members; expressed on CD4+CD25+ Tregs and is a negative regulator for inhibitory function of CD4+CD25+ Tregs. [5458].
Latency-associated peptide (LAP) The N-terminal propeptide of TGF_ precursor peptide that is expressed on the surface of activated Tregs; binds to TGF-β1 and then secretes as a complex of TGF-β and LAP. [5962]
CD152 A member of the immunoglobulin superfamily; is expressed on activated T cells; plays an important role in induction and maintenance of immune tolerance as a negative regulator of T cell-mediated immune responses. [6367]
Glycoprotein A repetitions predominant (GARP) A transmembrane protein that is expressed on the surface of activated Tregs; plays an important role in trafficking of TGF-β to plasma membrane of Tregs. [6872]

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by the NIH and the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. We thank Katherine Regan and Dr. Patricia Gonnella for editorial assistance.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Rudick RA, Polman CH. Current approaches to the identification and management of breakthrough disease in patients with multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:545–559. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70082-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Imitola J, Chitnis T, Khoury SJ. Cytokines in multiple sclerosis: from bench to bedside. Pharmacol Ther. 2005;106:163–177. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li Y, Chu N, Hu A, Gran B, Rostami A, Zhang GX. Increased IL-23p19 expression in multiple sclerosis lesions and its induction in microglia. Brain. 2007;130:490–501. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cua DJ, Sherlock J, Chen Y, Murphy CA, Joyce B, Seymour B, Lucian L, To W, Kwan S, Churakova T, et al. Interleukin-23 rather than interleukin-12 is the critical cytokine for autoimmune inflammation of the brain. Nature. 2003;421:744–748. doi: 10.1038/nature01355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Langrish CL, Chen Y, Blumenschein WM, Mattson J, Basham B, Sedgwick JD, McClanahan T, Kastelein RA, Cua DJ. IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation. J Exp Med. 2005;201:233–240. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fitzgerald DC, Ciric B, Touil T, Harle H, Grammatikopolou J, Sarma JD, Gran B, Zhang GX, Rostami A. Suppressive Effect of IL-27 on Encephalitogenic Th17 Cells and the Effector Phase of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2007;179:3268–3275. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.3268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bettelli E, Das MP, Howard ED, Weiner HL, Sobel RA, Kuchroo VK. IL-10 is critical in the regulation of autoimmune encephalomyelitis as demonstrated by studies of IL-10- and IL-4-deficient and transgenic mice. J Immunol. 1998;161:3299–3306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fitzgerald DC, Zhang GX, El-Behi M, Fonseca-Kelly Z, Li H, Yu S, Saris CJ, Gran B, Ciric B, Rostami A. Suppression of autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system by interleukin 10 secreted by interleukin 27-stimulated T cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:1372–1379. doi: 10.1038/ni1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao Z, Yu S, Fitzgerald DC, Elbehi M, Ciric B, Rostami AM, Zhang GX. IL-12Rbeta2 promotes the development of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2008;181:3870–3876. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.3870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hafler DA, Slavik JM, Anderson DE, O'Connor KC, De Jager P, Baecher-Allan C. Multiple sclerosis. Immunol Rev. 2005;204:208–231. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Boster A, Edan G, Frohman E, Javed A, Stuve O, Tselis A, Weiner H, Weinstock-Guttman B, Khan O. Intense immunosuppression in patients with rapidly worsening multiple sclerosis: treatment guidelines for the clinician. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:173–183. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.O'Garra A, Vieira P. Regulatory T cells and mechanisms of immune system control. Nat Med. 2004;10:801–805. doi: 10.1038/nm0804-801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vila J, Isaacs JD, Anderson AE. Regulatory T cells and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009;16:274–279. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32832a9a01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maloy KJ, Salaun L, Cahill R, Dougan G, Saunders NJ, Powrie F. CD4+CD25+ T(R) cells suppress innate immune pathology through cytokine-dependent mechanisms. J Exp Med. 2003;197:111–119. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shevach EM. Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 2009;30:636–645. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen W, Jin W, Hardegen N, Lei KJ, Li L, Marinos N, McGrady G, Wahl SM. Conversion of peripheral CD4+CD25− naive T cells to CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-beta induction of transcription factor Foxp3. J Exp Med. 2003;198:1875–1886. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liang S, Alard P, Zhao Y, Parnell S, Clark SL, Kosiewicz MM. Conversion of CD4+ CD25− cells into CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells in vivo requires B7 costimulation, but not the thymus. J Exp Med. 2005;201:127–137. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jee Y, Piao WH, Liu R, Bai XF, Rhodes S, Rodebaugh R, Campagnolo DI, Shi FD, Vollmer TL. CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells contribute to the therapeutic effects of glatiramer acetate in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Immunol. 2007;125:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2007.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lange C, Doster H, Steinbach K, Kalbacher H, Scholl M, Melms A, Bischof F. Differential modulation of CNS-specific effector and regulatory T cells during tolerance induction by recombinant invariant chains in vivo. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23:861–867. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Battaglia M, Gregori S, Bacchetta R, Roncarolo MG. Tr1 cells: from discovery to their clinical application. Semin Immunol. 2006;18:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2006.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ozdemir C, Akdis M, Akdis CA. T regulatory cells and their counterparts: masters of immune regulation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39:626–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03242.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Serafini G, Andreani M, Testi M, Battarra M, Bontadini A, Biral E, Fleischhauer K, Marktel S, Lucarelli G, Roncarolo MG, et al. Type 1 regulatory T cells are associated with persistent split erythroid/lymphoid chimerism after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for thalassemia. Haematologica. 2009;94:1415–1426. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2008.003129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Novak N, Bieber T. 2. Dendritic cells as regulators of immunity and tolerance. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:S370–S374. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.001. quiz S413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li YP, Latger-Canard V, Marchal L, Li N, Ou-Yang JP, Stoltz JF. The regulatory role of dendritic cells in the immune tolerance. Biomed Mater Eng. 2006;16:S163–S170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rutella S, Lemoli RM. Regulatory T cells and tolerogenic dendritic cells: from basic biology to clinical applications. Immunol Lett. 2004;94:11–26. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2004.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Steinman RM, Hawiger D, Nussenzweig MC. Tolerogenic dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:685–711. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gad M, Claesson MH, Pedersen AE. Dendritic cells in peripheral tolerance and immunity. Apmis. 2003;111:766–775. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2003.11107808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilczynski JR, Radwan M, Kalinka J. The characterization and role of regulatory T cells in immune reactions. Front Biosci. 2008;13:2266–2274. doi: 10.2741/2840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Akdis M, Blaser K, Akdis CA. T regulatory cells in allergy. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2006;91:159–173. doi: 10.1159/000090279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yamazaki T, Akiba H, Iwai H, Matsuda H, Aoki M, Tanno Y, Shin T, Tsuchiya H, Pardoll DM, Okumura K, et al. Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine T cells and APC. J Immunol. 2002;169:5538–5545. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.10.5538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Freeman GJ, Long AJ, Iwai Y, Bourque K, Chernova T, Nishimura H, Fitz LJ, Malenkovich N, Okazaki T, Byrne MC, et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med. 2000;192:1027–1034. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.7.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Groux H. Type 1 T-regulatory cells: their role in the control of immune responses. Transplantation. 2003;75:8S–12S. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000067944.90241.BD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roncarolo MG, Gregori S, Battaglia M, Bacchetta R, Fleischhauer K, Levings MK. Interleukin-10-secreting type 1 regulatory T cells in rodents and humans. Immunol Rev. 2006;212:28–50. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hayakawa K, Hardy RR. Phenotypic and functional alteration of CD4+ T cells after antigen stimulation. Resolution of two populations of memory T cells that both secrete interleukin 4. J Exp Med. 1989;169:2245–2250. doi: 10.1084/jem.169.6.2245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Greer JM, Koerner TA, Hayakawa K, Hardy RR, Kemp JD. The 3G11+ antigen, a marker for murine CD4+ TH1 lymphocytes, is a ganglioside. Glycobiology. 1993;3:391–401. doi: 10.1093/glycob/3.4.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ernst DN, Hobbs MV, Torbett BE, Glasebrook AL, Rehse MA, Bottomly K, Hayakawa K, Hardy RR, Weigle WO. Differences in the expression profiles of CD45RB, Pgp-1, and 3G11 membrane antigens and in the patterns of lymphokine secretion by splenic CD4+ T cells from young and aged mice. J Immunol. 1990;145:1295–1302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang GX, Yu S, Calida D, Zhao Z, Gran B, Kamoun M, Rostami A. Loss of the surface antigen 3G11 characterizes a distinct population of anergic/regulatory T cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2006;176:3366–3373. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.6.3366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhao Z, Ciric B, Yu S, Li H, Yang J, Kamoun M, Zhang GX, Rostami A. Expression of 3G11 epitope defines subpopulations of regulatory T cells with different suppressive potency. J Neurol Sci. 2010;295:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maier CC, Bhandoola A, Borden W, Yui K, Hayakawa K, Greene MI. Unique molecular surface features of in vivo tolerized T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:4499–4503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhao Z, Ciric B, Yu S, Zhang GX, Rostami A. Targeting ganglioside epitope 3G11 on the surface of CD4+ T cells suppresses EAE by altering the Treg/Th17 cell balance. Int Immunol. 2010;22:817–826. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxq432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Stassen M, Fondel S, Bopp T, Richter C, Muller C, Kubach J, Becker C, Knop J, Enk AH, Schmitt S, et al. Human CD25+ regulatory T cells: two subsets defined by the integrins alpha 4 beta 7 or alpha 4 beta 1 confer distinct suppressive properties upon CD4+ T helper cells. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:1303–1311. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang HX, Zhang W, Zhao LD, Li Y, Zhang FC, Tang FL, He W, Zhang X. Are CD4+CD25-Foxp3+ cells in untreated new-onset lupus patients regulatory T cells? Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11:R153. doi: 10.1186/ar2829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reefer AJ, Satinover SM, Solga MD, Lannigan JA, Nguyen JT, Wilson BB, Woodfolk JA. Analysis of CD25hiCD4+ "regulatory" T-cell subtypes in atopic dermatitis reveals a novel T(H)2-like population. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121:415–422. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.11.003. e413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kelsen J, Agnholt J, Hoffmann HJ, Romer JL, Hvas CL, Dahlerup JF. FoxP3(+)CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells with regulatory properties can be cultured from colonic mucosa of patients with Crohn's disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;141:549–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02876.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang SY, Zhang Z, Fu JL, Kang FB, Xu XS, Nie WM, Zhou CB, Zhao M, Wang FS. Progressive CD127 down-regulation correlates with increased apoptosis of CD8 T cells during chronic HIV-1 infection. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:1425–1434. doi: 10.1002/eji.200839059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kiazyk SA, Fowke KR. Loss of CD127 expression links immune activation and CD4(+) T cell loss in HIV infection. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:567–573. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.McKay FC, Swain LI, Schibeci SD, Rubio JP, Kilpatrick TJ, Heard RN, Stewart GJ, Booth DR. CD127 immunophenotyping suggests altered CD4+ T cell regulation in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. J Autoimmun. 2008;31:52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2008.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dunham RM, Cervasi B, Brenchley JM, Albrecht H, Weintrob A, Sumpter B, Engram J, Gordon S, Klatt NR, Frank I, et al. CD127 and CD25 expression defines CD4+ T cell subsets that are differentially depleted during HIV infection. J Immunol. 2008;180:5582–5592. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.8.5582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vrabelova Z, Hrotekova Z, Hladikova Z, Bohmova K, Stechova K, Michalek J. CD 127− and FoxP3+ expression on CD25+CD4+ T regulatory cells upon specific diabetogeneic stimulation in high-risk relatives of type 1 diabetes mellitus patients. Scand J Immunol. 2008;67:404–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2008.02074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Endharti AT, Rifa IM, Shi Z, Fukuoka Y, Nakahara Y, Kawamoto Y, Takeda K, Isobe K, Suzuki H. Cutting edge: CD8+CD122+ regulatory T cells produce IL-10 to suppress IFN-gamma production and proliferation of CD8+ T cells. J Immunol. 2005;175:7093–7097. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Suzuki H, Shi Z, Okuno Y, Isobe K. Are CD8+CD122+ cells regulatory T cells or memory T cells? Hum Immunol. 2008;69:751–754. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.08.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rifa'i M, Shi Z, Zhang SY, Lee YH, Shiku H, Isobe K, Suzuki H. CD8+CD122+ regulatory T cells recognize activated T cells via conventional MHC class I-alphabetaTCR interaction and become IL-10-producing active regulatory cells. Int Immunol. 2008;20:937–947. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxn052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Saitoh O, Abiru N, Nakahara M, Nagayama Y. CD8+CD122+ T cells, a newly identified regulatory T subset, negatively regulate Graves' hyperthyroidism in a murine model. Endocrinology. 2007;148:6040–6046. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.van Olffen RW, Koning N, van Gisbergen KP, Wensveen FM, Hoek RM, Boon L, Hamann J, van Lier RA, Nolte MA. GITR triggering induces expansion of both effector and regulatory CD4+ T cells in vivo. J Immunol. 2009;182:7490–7500. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0802751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kamimura Y, Iwai H, Piao J, Hashiguchi M, Azuma M. The glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related protein (GITR)-GITR ligand pathway acts as a mediator of cutaneous dendritic cell migration and promotes T cell-mediated acquired immunity. J Immunol. 2009;182:2708–2716. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ramirez-Montagut T, Chow A, Hirschhorn-Cymerman D, Terwey TH, Kochman AA, Lu S, Miles RC, Sakaguchi S, Houghton AN, van den Brink MR. Glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor family related gene activation overcomes tolerance/ignorance to melanoma differentiation antigens and enhances antitumor immunity. J Immunol. 2006;176:6434–6442. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.176.11.6434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Muriglan SJ, Ramirez-Montagut T, Alpdogan O, Van Huystee TW, Eng JM, Hubbard VM, Kochman AA, Tjoe KH, Riccardi C, Pandolfi PP, et al. GITR activation induces an opposite effect on alloreactive CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in graft-versus-host disease. J Exp Med. 2004;200:149–157. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ronchetti S, Zollo O, Bruscoli S, Agostini M, Bianchini R, Nocentini G, Ayroldi E, Riccardi C. GITR, a member of the TNF receptor superfamily, is costimulatory to mouse T lymphocyte subpopulations. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:613–622. doi: 10.1002/eji.200324804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Chen ML, Yan BS, Bando Y, Kuchroo VK, Weiner HL. Latency-associated peptide identifies a novel CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell subset with TGFbeta-mediated function and enhanced suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2008;180:7327–7337. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.11.7327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ali NA, Gaughan AA, Orosz CG, Baran CP, McMaken S, Wang Y, Eubank TD, Hunter M, Lichtenberger FJ, Flavahan NA, et al. Latency associated peptide has in vitro and in vivo immune effects independent of TGF-beta1. PLoS One. 2008;3:e1914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Andersson J, Tran DQ, Pesu M, Davidson TS, Ramsey H, O'Shea JJ, Shevach EM. CD4+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells confer infectious tolerance in a TGF-beta-dependent manner. J Exp Med. 2008;205:1975–1981. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tran DQ, Andersson J, Hardwick D, Bebris L, Illei GG, Shevach EM. Selective expression of latency-associated peptide (LAP) and IL-1 receptor type I/II (CD121a/CD121b) on activated human FOXP3+ regulatory T cells allows for their purification from expansion cultures. Blood. 2009;113:5125–5133. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-199950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kurtz J, Raval F, Vallot C, Der J, Sykes M. CTLA-4 on alloreactive CD4 T cells interacts with recipient CD80/86 to promote tolerance. Blood. 2009;113:3475–3484. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-01-133736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kolar P, Knieke K, Hegel JK, Quandt D, Burmester GR, Hoff H, Brunner-Weinzierl MC. CTLA-4 (CD152) controls homeostasis and suppressive capacity of regulatory T cells in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:123–132. doi: 10.1002/art.24181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Vasu C, Prabhakar BS, Holterman MJ. Targeted CTLA-4 engagement induces CD4+CD25+CTLA-4high T regulatory cells with target (allo)antigen specificity. J Immunol. 2004;173:2866–2876. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.4.2866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jago CB, Yates J, Camara NO, Lechler RI, Lombardi G. Differential expression of CTLA-4 among T cell subsets. Clin Exp Immunol. 2004;136:463–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02478.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T, Miyara M, Fehervari Z, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. CTLA-4 control over Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function. Science. 2008;322:271–275. doi: 10.1126/science.1160062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Stockis J, Colau D, Coulie PG, Lucas S. Membrane protein GARP is a receptor for latent TGF-beta on the surface of activated human Treg. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:3315–3322. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Tran DQ, Andersson J, Wang R, Ramsey H, Unutmaz D, Shevach EM. GARP (LRRC32) is essential for the surface expression of latent TGF-beta on platelets and activated FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13445–13450. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901944106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Probst-Kepper M, Geffers R, Kroger A, Viegas N, Erck C, Hecht HJ, Lunsdorf H, Roubin R, Moharregh-Khiabani D, Wagner K, et al. GARP: a key receptor controlling FOXP3 in human regulatory T cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13:3343–3357. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00782.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang R, Kozhaya L, Mercer F, Khaitan A, Fujii H, Unutmaz D. Expression of GARP selectively identifies activated human FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:13439–13444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901965106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang R, Wan Q, Kozhaya L, Fujii H, Unutmaz D. Identification of a regulatory T cell specific cell surface molecule that mediates suppressive signals and induces Foxp3 expression. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES