Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cryst Growth. 2011 Mar 1;318(1):846–850. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.11.043

Recent Developments on High Curie Temperature PIN-PMN-PT Ferroelectric Crystals

Shujun Zhang 1,*, Fei Li 1,4, Nevin P Sherlock 2, Jun Luo 3, Hyeong Jae Lee 1, Ru Xia 1, Richard J Meyer Jr 2, Wesley Hackenberger 3, Thomas R Shrout 1
PMCID: PMC3079241  NIHMSID: NIHMS258421  PMID: 21516190

Abstract

Pb(In0.5Nb0.5)O3-Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 (PIN-PMN-PT) ferroelectric crystals attracted extensive attentions in last couple years, due to their higher usage temperatures range (> 30°C) and coercive fields (~5kV/cm), meanwhile maintaining similar electromechanical couplings (k33> 90%) and piezoelectric coefficients (d33~1500pC/N), when compared to their binary counterpart Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3. In this article, we reviewed recent developments on the PIN-PMN-PT single crystals, including the Bridgman crystal growth, dielectric, electromechanical, piezoelectric and ferroelectric behaviors as function of temperature and dc bias. Mechanical quality factor Q was studied as function of orientation and phase. Of particular interest is the dynamic strain, which related to the Q and d33, was found to be improved when compared to binary system, exhibiting the potential usage of PIN-PMN-PT in high power application. Furthermore, PIN-PMN-PT crystals exhibit improved thickness dependent properties, due to their small domain size, being on the order of 1μm. Finally, the manganese acceptor dopant in the ternary crystals was investigated and discussed briefly in this paper.

Keywords: B2. Ferroelectric Materials, B2. Piezoelectric Materials, A1. Characterization, PIN-PMN-PT crystals

I. Introduction

Relaxor-based Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbTiO3 (PMNT) single crystals offer electromechanical properties that far out-perform polycrystalline PZT based ceramics, making them promising candidates for medical ultrasonic imaging, sonar transducers and solid-state actuators [17]. Their relatively low Curie temperatures (TCs ~130–170°C), however, limit their applications in transducers, further restricted by ferroelectric phase transitions TRM/TMT (R: rhombohedral; M: monoclinic; T: tetragonal), which occurs at a significantly lower temperature than TC. Thus, single crystal systems with high TRM/TMT.temperatures for enhanced temperature usage range and thermal stability are desired. In addition to the thermal stability requirement, ferroelectric crystals used in electromechanical devices, such as high power sonar transducers, are subjected to high electric fields, where low dielectric/mechanical losses and relatively high coercive fields are necessary. The dielectric loss of PMNT crystals have been reported to be on the order of ≤0.4%, similar to the values observed in “hard” PZT based piezoelectrics, however, their mechanical quality factors Q (inverse of mechanical loss of crystals) are found to be ~ 100, similar to “soft” PZT ceramics. Furthermore, the coercive field (EC) of crystals is on the order of ~2kV/cm, restricting their usage to low ac voltage applications or devices requiring a “biased” drive level.

Recently, numerous researchers have focused on relaxor-PT single crystals with relatively higher TC and TRM/TMT, including Pb(Sc1/2Nb1/2)O3 PbTiO3 (PSNT) and Pb(Yb1/2Nb1/2)O3-PbTiO3 (PYNT) [79]. The MPB composition in the PYNT system exhibits a TC of ~360 °C, the highest among all the lead based relaxor-PT systems and similar to PZT. Single crystals in the PYNT system were grown using the flux method, with TC and TRT observed to be ~325°C and 160°C, respectively. The increased TRT results in a broadened temperature usage range and improved temperature dependent property [7]. New perovskite single crystals in (1-x)BiScO3-xPbTiO3 (BSPT100x) system were also explored, where a Curie temperature around ~400°C and TRT of 350°C for BSPT57 single crystals were observed [1012]. Analogous to PSNT and PYNT systems, however, BSPT crystals have only been grown using the high temperature flux method with limited growth, being on the order of millimeter size. In order to obtain high TC/TRT large size single crystals, two approaches have been used, including solid state crystal growth (SSCG) of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 [13] and modified Bridgman growth of Pb(In0.5Nb0.5)O3-Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 (PIN-PMN-PT) single crystals [1427].

In this paper, recent developments on PIN-PMN-PT single crystals are reviewed and compared to PMNT, including the Bridgman growth method and the dielectric, piezoelectric and ferroelectric behavior as function of temperature and dc bias. Mechanical quality factor (inverse of loss) was studied in relation to the engineered domain configuration and/or acceptor modifications, under small signal and dynamic test conditions. Thickness dependent properties of PIN-PMN-PT crystals were also studied for potential high frequency applications.

II. Experimental

Pure and manganese modified PIN-PMN-PT ternary single crystals, with ~75mm in diameter and >100mm in length, were grown along the [001] crystallographic direction by seeded Bridgman technique. The starting compositions were PIN-PMN-PT with 26–36% PIN and 28–32%PT, the manganese modification was in the range of 0.5–5 mol%, above which, the dopant will deteriorate the congruently melting. In Bridgman growth process, cylindrical platinum crucibles charged with PIN-PMN-PT starting materials were placed in a two-zone furnace. The temperature of the upper-zone was set 80–120°C higher than the melting point of the ternary compound (~1300°C), while the lower-zone temperature was 300–500°C lower, with an axial temperature gradient being on the order of 30~50°C/cm. After the charge was melted in the upper-zone, the crucible was slowly lowered through the temperature gradient to allow unidirectional crystallization [23], after the growth process, the crystal slowly cooled down to room temperature at 10–30°C/h to avoid the crystal crack. An as- grown crystal boule, being 75 mm in diameter and 100 mm in length, is shown in Fig. 1 (small inset). Analogous to binary PMNT crystals, the composition along the growth direction varies due to the large segregation of Ti4+ (~0.85), also shown in Fig. 1, where the PT content varied from 28% to 35% along the growth direction, with low PT content observed at the bottom part of grown crystal boules, whereas the top portion generally lies in the high PT tetragonal phase region. The PIN and PMN were found to have less segregation, being about ~1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Compositional variation along the growth direction of as-grown PIN-PMN-PT crystals with 75mm diameter.

Samples with different compositions were oriented along the [001] direction by real-time Laue X-ray, following IEEE standard [24], then cut/dice to the proper dimension and polished using 12 micron SiC powder. Vacuum sputtered gold was applied to the sample surfaces as electrodes. Samples with rhombohedral and/or monoclinic phase(s) were poled by applying an electric field of 15kV/cm at room temperature, while tetragonal crystals were poled at the temperature above TCs, with small dc electric field of 3 kV/cm. Dielectric behavior under external dc bias was measured as a function of temperature, with dc bias varying from 0 to 20 kV/cm and in 1 kV/cm step. A blocking circuit was used to protect the multifrequency LCR meter (HP4284A) under high dc bias field, supplied by a Trek609C-6 high-voltage dc amplifier. The resonance fr and antiresonance fa frequencies as function of temperature were obtained using HP 4194A impedance-phase gain analyzer, connected to a computer controlled temperature chamber. The electromechanical coupling factors and mechanical quality factors were calculated according to IEEE standard. High field polarization measurements as a function of temperature were performed on [001] oriented plate samples using a modified Sawyer-Tower circuit and linear variable differential transducer (LVDT) driven by a lock-in amplifier (Stanford Research system, Model SR830), from which the coercive field and internal bias could be determined.

The dynamic material properties were determined under high drive (1–200 Vpk) conditions. A linear frequency modulation pulse was generated by a National Instruments PXI- 1033, which swept through the sample resonance frequency under a constant applied voltage. By measuring the voltage and current, the complex impedance spectrum was calculated. The vibration velocity was measured by laser velocimeter. From the data, the maximum dynamic strain was calculated from the maximum vibration velocity and sample length, assuming a cosine distribution of strain. The effective mechanical quality factor was also calculated [25].

III. Results and Discussions

3.1 Temperature Dependent Properties

Fig. 2 shows the electromechanical coupling k33 and piezoelectric coefficient d33 (small inset) as functions of temperature for PIN-PMN-PT crystals, compared to PMNT. The electromechanical coupling factors were found to be on the order of 0.90 for both crystals at −50°C, maintaining similar values with increasing temperature, while the values decrease sharply above ferroelectric phase transition temperatures TRT, due to partial depolarization of the crystals. The piezoelectric coefficients were found to increase with increasing temperature and reach maxima values at the phase transition temperature, whereupon they decreased significantly. Again, as observed in the dielectric behavior, the usage temperature range of PIN-PMN-PT crystal is ~30°C higher than its binary counterpart.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Electromechanical coupling factor k33 and piezoelectric coefficient d33 (small inset) as function of temperature for PIN-PMN-PT and PMNT crystals.

Fig. 3 gives the coercive field (EC) as a function of temperature for both PMNT and PIN-PMN-PT crystals. EC was found to be on the order of 4.6kV/cm at room temperature for ternary crystals, decreasing to 3.4kV/cm at 100°C, due to the easier domain reversal at elevated temperature. The EC slightly increased to 3.7kV/cm at 110°C owing to the coexistence of rhombohedral and tetragonal phases, which induced by the combination of temperature and electric field, above which the crystals are in tetragonal phase, where the EC further decreased with increasing temperature. The EC behavior of PMNT follows similar trend as observed for the ternary crystals, but with much lower values, being on the order of 2kV/cm at room temperature.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Coercive field EC as function of temperature for PIN-PMN-PT and PMNT crystals.

3.2 Mechanical Quality Factor

To achieve high Q in relaxor-PT crystals, two approaches have been implemented. Fig. 4 presents the mechanical quality factor Q for longitudinal PIN-PMN-PT crystal bars as function of crystallographic orientation and phase. It was found that the Q was maximum for single domain [111] poled samples, being on the order of ~1000, with values being less than ~200 for [001] oriented crystals. Of particular significance was the high mechanical Q, being on the order of ~500 for the [110] engineered domain configuration “2R”, with an electromechanical coupling factor k33 on the order of ~0.90. The high Q for the domain engineered configuration “2R” (“2R” is one of the domain-engineered structures designated according to the crystal phase and poling direction [2829]) is due to the overall reduced domain wall mobility, while no domain walls exist in single domain state, where much higher Qs are expected [30]. Mechanical Q is not only dependent on the domain configuration, but also on the composition or proximity of the MPB. For lower PT content crystals, being relatively far away from the MPB, higher mechanical Qs were observed, as shown in Fig. 4. It should be noted that the single domain tetragonal crystals (poled along [001] direction) possessed Q values, being on the order of >800. Analogous to “hard” PZT ceramics, acceptor dopants were investigated inPIN-PMN-PT crystals, where the acceptor doping led to the building-up of an internal bias, giving rise to higher Q values due to domain wall pinning/clamping and/or lattice stiffness, revealing that the internal bias contribute to the high Q in doped crystals [31]. Fig. 5 shows the mechanical Q as function of temperature for Mn-doped PIN-PMN-PT crystals along different orientations. The room temperature Q values were found to be on the order of ~800 and 1050 for [001] and [110] directions respectively, decreasing to ~240 and 120 at their ferroelectric phase transition temperatures, above which, Q increased. Correspondingly, the internal bias Eint as function of temperature given in the small inset of Fig. 5, showed similar trends as observed for Q values. The faster drop of Q with temperature for [110] oriented samples is due to rapid decrease of Eint with temperature.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Mechanical quality factor Q as function of crystallographic orientations and phase for PIN-PMN-PT crystals (<001> poled R crystal designated “4R” engineered domain configuration, while <110> and <111> poled R crystals designated “2R” and “1R” respectively, <001> poled T crystal designated “1T” [2829]).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Mechanical quality factor Q as function of temperature for Mn- doped PIN-PMN-PT crystals (small inset shows internal bias as function of temperature).

The maximum dynamic strains of PIN-PMN-PT and PMNT crystals, measured at resonance frequency, are compared in Fig. 6 (small inset) as a function of peak electric field, where PIN-PMN-PT exhibit greater strain levels than PMNT. Although the small signal d33·Q product is often qualitative indication of dynamic material performance, it is a limited metric for predicting high drive performance [25]. For example, the d33 ·Q product suggests that tetragonal crystals (>400,000 pC/N) should exhibit greater dynamic strain levels than rhombohedral crystal (< 300,000 pC/N), but Fig. 6 shows the two having similar strain levels. Based on the observed strain, and knowing that Q is a much stronger function of drive level than d33, these data suggest that Q decreases more rapidly for tetragonal crystals as a function of increasing drive. As expected, there is a steep initial drop in Q with increasing dynamic strain (Fig. 5). In the case of tetragonal crystals, however, the drop in Q is proportionally much steeper, with Q values being on the order of ~1000 at low strain level, decreasing to ~140 at strain level of 0.08%. Meanwhile, the Q values were decreased from ~200 to about ~50 with increasing dynamic strain for rhombohedral PIN-PMN-PT and PMNT.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Mechanical quality factor Q as function of maximum dynamic strain for PIN-PMN-PT with R and T phases, compared to PMNT crystals (small inset shows maximum dynamic strain as function of driving electric field).

3.3 Thickness Dependent Properties

It is important to study the thickness dependent properties of relaxor-PT crystals for the high frequency ultrasonic transducer applications, since the frequency range of transducer is closely related to the scale of the piezoelectric element [27, 3233]. From Fig. 7, it was found that the clamped permittivities of both PMNT and PIN-PMN-PT single crystals exhibited similar values across the range of thicknesses; however, the free permittivity of PMNT crystals was strongly affected by the sample scale. At a thickness of ~40 μm, the free permittivity of PMNT crystals was reduced by half. In contrast, PIN-PMN-PT crystals exhibited minimal thickness dependent dielectric properties, even down to thicknesses ≤40 μm. As a consequence, the electromechanical coupling factor k33 (calculated from the equation k33=1(ε33S/ε33T)) of PMNT crystals decreased significantly as function of sample thickness, while the coupling of PIN-PMN-PT crystals exhibit thickness independent behavior, as shown in the small inset. The underlying mechanism responsible for the degradation in PMNT crystals is believed to be related to their relatively large domains, being on the order of >10μm, where the domains were clamped and polarization rotations suppressed, due to the surface boundary effect when samples scales approaching the domain size, while the much smaller domain size of PIN-PMN-PT (~1μm) will benefit the properties at fine scale. More recent research is now carried out on PMNT crystals, in order to get smaller domain size by modified poling condition.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Dielectric permittivity as function of sample thickness for PIN-PMN-PT crystals, compared to PMNT (small inset shows coupling factor as function of sample thickness).

IV. Conclusion

In summary, PIN-PMN-PT single crystals with diameters >75mm were grown by the modified Bridgman technique. Piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties were studied as function of temperature, showing a higher usage temperature range for PIN-PMN-PT, when compared to binary PMNT crystals, being on the order of 30°C. High mechanical quality factor Qs were achieved by domain engineering and/or acceptor dopant methods, being 500–800, while maintaining high electromechanical properties. In addition, PIN-PMN-PT exhibits higher dynamic strain when compared to PMNT, together with its high usage temperature range, high coercive field and small domain size, demonstrating that the ternary crystals are promising candidates for high power and/or high frequency transducer applications.

Acknowledgments

The work supported by NIH under Grant No. P41-EB21820 and ONR.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Park SE, Shrout TR. IEEE Trans Ultrason, Ferroelect, Freq Contr. 1997;44:1140–1147. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Park SE, Shrout TR. J Appl Phys. 1997;82:1804–1811. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang S, Lebrun L, Randall C, Shrout T. J Cryst Growth. 2004;267:204–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Luo HS, Xu GS, Xu HQ, Wang PC, Yin ZW. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2000;39:5581–5585. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Davis M, Damjanovic D, Setter N. Phys Rev B. 2006;73:014115. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang SJ, Luo J, Xia R, Rehrig PW, Randall CA, Shrout TR. Solid State Communications. 2006;137:16–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang SJ, Shrout TR. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectric Freq Control. 2010;57:2138–2146. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bing YH, Ye ZG. J Cryst Growth. 2003;250:118–125. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang SJ, Rehrig PW, Randall CA, Shrout TR. J Crys Growth. 2002;234:415–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang SJ, Lebrun L, Rhee S, Eitel RE, Randall CA, Shrout TR. J Crystal Grow. 2002;236:210–216. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang SJ, Jeong DY, Zhang QM, Shrout TR. J Crystal Grow. 2003;247:131–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhang SJ, Randall CA, Shrout TR. Appl Phys Lett. 2003;83:3150–3152. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang SJ, Lee SM, Kim DH, Lee HY, Shrout TR. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90:3859–3862. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Guo Y, Luo HS, He T, Yin Z. Solid Stat Commun. 2002;123:417–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yasuda N, Ohwa H, Hasegawa D, Hayashi K, Hosono Y, Yamashita Y, Iwata M, Ishibashi Y. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2000;39:5586–5588. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Duan ZQ, Xu GS, Wang XF, Yang DF, Pan XM, Wang PC. Sol Stat Commun. 2005;134:559–563. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tian J, Han P, Huang X, Pan H, Carroll JF, III, Payne DA. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;91:222903. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu GS, Chen K, Yang DF, Li JB. Appl Phys Lett. 2007;90:032901. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang SJ, Luo J, Hackenberger W, Shrout TR. J Appl Phys. 2008;104:064106. doi: 10.1063/1.2978333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang SJ, Luo J, Hackenberger W, Sherlock NP, Meyer RJ, Jr, Shrout TR. J Appl Phys. 2009;105:104506. doi: 10.1063/1.3131622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li F, Zhang SJ, Xu Z, Wei XY, Luo J, Shrout TR. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;96:192903. doi: 10.1063/1.3430059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu XZ, Zhang SJ, Luo J, Shrout TR, Cao WW. J Appl Phys. 2009;106:074112. doi: 10.1063/1.3243169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Luo J, Hackenberger W, Zhang SJ, Shrout TR. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings; 2008. pp. 261–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.IEEE Standards on Piezoelectricity. IEEE; New York: 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sherlock NP, Zhang SJ, Luo J, Lee HY, Shrout TR, Meyer RJ., Jr J Appl Phys. 2010;107:074108. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang SJ, Luo J, Li F, Meyer RJ, Jr, Hackenberger W, Shrout TR. Acta Materialia. 2010;58:3773–3780. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lee HJ, Zhang SJ, Shrout TR. J Appl Phys. 2010;107:124107. doi: 10.1063/1.3437068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Davis M, Damjanovic D, Hayem D, Setter N. J Appl Phys. 2005;98:014102. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Davis M, Damjanovic D, Setter N. Appl Phys Lett. 2005;87:102904. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang SJ, Sherlock NP, Meyer RJ, Jr, Shrout TR. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;94:162906. doi: 10.1063/1.3125431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang SJ, Lee SM, Kim DH, Lee HY, Shrout TR. Appl Phys Lett. 2008;93:122908. doi: 10.1063/1.2992081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee HJ, Zhang SJ, Luo J, Li F, Shrout TR. Adv Funct Mater. 2010;20:3154–3162. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201000390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jiang X, Snook K, Hackenberger W, Geng X. Proc SPIE. 2007;6531:65310F. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES