Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: Phytopathol Mediterr. 2009 Apr;48(1):136–139.

Sorosphaera viticola, a plasmodiophorid parasite of grapevine

Sigrid NEUHAUSER 1, Lars HUBER 2, Martin KIRCHMAIR 1
PMCID: PMC3079901  EMSID: UKMS34114  PMID: 21516252

Summary

Sorosphaera viticola is a soil-borne, endophytic parasite of grapevine. It is classified within the plasmodiophorids, an enigmatic group of obligate biotrophic parasites of higher plants. Sorosphaera viticola has been found abundantly in the roots of Vitis spp. in Germany and Canada. This may indicate a global distribution of this root parasite. But its biphasic life-cycle, its soil-borne nature and its co-occurrence with other soil-borne pathogens make an assessment of the disease pattern or a possible yield reduction of this fungus difficult.

Keywords: Vitis, soil-borne, Cercozoa, clubroot, protist


In 2003 a new plasmodiophorid plant parasite was discovered in phylloxera-infested root samples from grapevine in a vineyard in the German Rheingau. Although this parasite has since been found repeatedly in phylloxera-induced nodosities, no correlation between phylloxera– and plasmodiophorid – infestation has been found. Sorosphaera viticola Kirchm., Neuh. & L. Huber infests the cortical tissue of vine roots, where it forms masses of resting spores which are aggregated to characteristic sporosori (Huber et al., 2004; Kirchmair et al., 2005a; Fig.2, 3, 5). This was the first record of a plasmodiophorid organism in grapevine, although, at the end of the 19th century three “plasmodiophorids” from grapevine were reported: Plasmodiophora vitis Viala & Sauvag. (Viala and Sauvageau, 1882a), P. californica Viala & Sauvag. (Viala and Sauvageau, 1892b), and Frankiella viticola Speschnew (Speschnew, 1901), all of which were observed only in the leaves of V. vinifera. However, careful investigations by Massee (1893) indicated that the two Plasmodiophora species were phantom species confused with vacuolated tannin vesicles (for the whole story refer to Kirchmair et al., 2005a). The Frankiella viticola disease, nowadays known as bitter rot of grapes, is in fact caused by the ascomycete Greeneria uvicola (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Punith. The confusion caused by these parasites was not restricted to grapevine: the whole group of plasmodiophorids has been a challenge to taxonomists since their first discovery. Woronin (1878) described this group as comprising the “most primitive myxomycetes”. Traditionally, myxomycetes and therefore plasmodiophorids were treated as primitive fungi (Cook, 1932), but recent phylogenetic studies based on molecular data settled them within the Cercozoa, a group of protists closely related to the Foraminifera and Radiolaria (Archibald and Keeling, 2003; Cavalier-Smith, 2003), and which are embedded within the eukaryotic supergroup Rhizaria (Baldauf, 2003; López-García and Moreira, 2008).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Sorosphaera viticola Kirchm., Neuh. & L. Huber. 1. Infested vine exhibiting a precocious reddening. In the insert, arrows mark the infested parts of an excavated rootstock. 2–3. Scanning electron micrographs of sporosori (aggregated resting spores). Bar=100 μm

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Sorosphaera viticola Kirchm., Neuh. & L. Huber. 1. Infested vine exhibiting a precocious reddening. In the insert, arrows mark the infested parts of an excavated rootstock. 2–3. Scanning electron micrographs of sporosori (aggregated resting spores). Bar=100 μm

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Sorosphaera viticola Kirchm., Neuh. & L. Huber. 1. Infested vine exhibiting a precocious reddening. In the insert, arrows mark the infested parts of an excavated rootstock. 2–3. Scanning electron micrographs of sporosori (aggregated resting spores). Bar=100 μm

Plasmodiophorids are an intriguing group of obligate intercellular parasites of green plants and straminipiles characterised by a multiphasic life-cycle with two main developmental phases (Karling, 1968; Braselton, 1995): (1) primary zoospores encyst and inject their protoplast into the host tissue. These amoebae develop into multinucleate plasmodia and subsequently into thin-walled zoosporangia; (2) secondary zoospores infect host tissues, develop into plasmodia and subsequently into thick-walled resting spores. To date the life-cycle of S. viticola has still not been completely elucidated. Secondary plasmodia developing into resting spores were described by Huber et al. (2004) and the biflagellate (primary) zoospores were observed by Kirchmair et al. (2005a). Until now, the zoosporangial part of the life-cycle was not observed for S. viticola, but this is the subject of an ongoing research program (Austrian Science Fund FWF grant T379). Recently, we observed suspicious structures resembling sporangiosori (also referred to as zoosporangia) in the root stem cortical tissue of vines grafted on SO4. As plasmodiophorid zoosporangia lack the characteristic traits whereby species can be distinguished, their identity is currently being tested by PCR-based methods. Nothing is so far known about whether and how S. viticola spreads out within the host plant after infection. Direct observation of plant roots indicates that sporosori are crowded within distinct areas but that these sites are unevenly distributed through the root system (Fig.1, insert). Whether S. viticola also occurs in other plant parts than the roots is currently being investigated. But until now we have found no evidence that the grapevine plasmodiophorids occur in any other plant tissue than the root cortex. The life-cycle of S. viticola seems therefore quite different from that of its probable next relative S. veronicae, which forms zoosporangia in the roots of Veronica spp. and resting spores in hypertrophies in the stem.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Sorosphaera viticola Kirchm., Neuh. & L. Huber. 1. Infested vine exhibiting a precocious reddening. In the insert, arrows mark the infested parts of an excavated rootstock. 2–3. Scanning electron micrographs of sporosori (aggregated resting spores). Bar=100 μm

The resting spores of S. viticola are aggregated into hollow sporosori. A single sporosorus of S. viticola consists of fifteen to thirty (sometimes up to 50) thick-walled resting spores (Fig. 2, 5). These resting spores with their typical assembly are the most prominent part of the life-cycle and the only distinctive structure whereby plasmodiophorids can be identified and determined morphologically. The sporosori of S. viticola have a further characteristic trait: using epifluorescence microscopy, most of the sporosori exhibit a characteristic yellow to yellowish-green fluorescence at an excitation of 450–490 nm (Neuhauser et al., 2005; Fig.6). Fluorescence was used by Huber et al. (2006) to screen root samples for the grapevine plasmodiophorid in two commercial vineyards. Screening of the fine roots demonstrated an abundant occurrence of S. viticola in commercial vineyards (Huber et al., 2006) and in the roots of wild North-American Vitis riparia (Huber et al., 2007). Resting spores of S. viticola were found in the roots of V. vinifera, V. riparia and the V. berlandieri×V. riparia hybrids SO4, 5BB and 5C. Random sampling approaches in Germany and Canada suggest a high abundance of S. viticola in vines growing in soils with a high water-holding capacity.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Sorosphaera viticola Kirchm., Neuh. & L. Huber. 1. Infested vine exhibiting a precocious reddening. In the insert, arrows mark the infested parts of an excavated rootstock. 2–3. Scanning electron micrographs of sporosori (aggregated resting spores). Bar=100 μm

Besides the extraordinary life-cycle and their close interaction with host plants, plasmodiophorids are well known to plant pathologists, as some are also important pathogens of (annual) crops such as those of cruciferous plants (club root, fingers and toes disease caused by P. brassicae Woron., reviewed in Karling, 1968) and potatoes (powdery scab caused by Spongospora subterranea f. sp. subterranea J.A. Toml., reviewed by Merz, 2008). Equally important, some plasmodiophorids are vectors of plant viruses: Polymyxa graminis Ledingham transmits more than ten viruses to major cereal crops like barley, maize or rice (reviewed by Kanyuka et al., 2003), and Polymyxa betae Keskin transmits the virus that causes rhizomania in sugar beets (reviewed by Varrelmann, 2007). The discovery of S. viticola therefore stimulated our interest to investigate its role as a plant pathogen and a possible vector for viruses (Kirchmair et al., 2005b). But so far the only evident disease symptom correlated with S. viticola is a diminutive root necrosis which can serve as entrance portals for additional grapevine pests and pathogens (Fig. 4). Observations in the field indicate that an atypical precocious reddening of the scion may be linked to an infestation with this parasite (Fig.1). This symptom would be in line with the reddening of Poaceae described as typical symptom of infestation with Sorosphaera radicalis Ivimey Cook (Cook and Schwarz, 1929). In one vineyard the vines infested with S. viticola had poorer growth characteristics than plants without proven infestation, but until now growth depression, yield loss or dieback of vines could not be directly attributed to S. viticola. More information about the life-cycle, distribution and abundance of S. viticola are needed to understand the impact of this enigmatic organism on grapevine and viticulture.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Sorosphaera viticola Kirchm., Neuh. & L. Huber. 1. Infested vine exhibiting a precocious reddening. In the insert, arrows mark the infested parts of an excavated rootstock. 2–3. Scanning electron micrographs of sporosori (aggregated resting spores). Bar=100 μm

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank R. Pöder, University of Innsbruck, Austria for passing on his knowledge and expertise. S. Neuhauser thanks the Austrian Science Fund for a Hertha-Firnberg research grant (FWF; project T379).

Literature cited

  1. Archibald JM, Keeling PJ. Actin and ubiquitin protein sequences support a cercozoan/foraminiferan ancestry for the plasmodiophorid plant pathogens. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 2003;51:113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00172.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baldauf SL. The deep roots of eukaryotes. Science. 2003;300:1703–1706. doi: 10.1126/science.1085544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braselton JP. Current status of the plasmodiophorids. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 1995;21:263–275. doi: 10.3109/10408419509113543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavalier-Smith T. Protist phylogeny and the high–level classification of Protozoa. European Journal of Protistology. 2003;39:338–348. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cook WRI. The parasitic slime moulds. The Hong Kong Naturalist Supplement. 1932;1:29–39. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cook WRI, Schwartz EJ. The life history of Sorosphaera radicale, sp. nov. Annals of Botany. 1929;43:81–98. [Google Scholar]
  7. Huber L, Eisenbeis G, Rühl EH, Pagay V, Kirchmair M. Distribution and host range of the grapevine plasmodiophorid Sorosphaera viticola. Vitis. 2007;46:23–25. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huber L, Hammes M, Eisenbeis G, Pöder R, Kirchmair M. First record of a plasmodiophorid parasite in grapevine. Vitis. 2004;43:187–189. [Google Scholar]
  9. Huber L, Scholz C, Eisenbeis G, Rühl EH, Neuhauser S, Kirchmair M. Field distribution of Sorosphaera viticola in commercial vineyards in Germany. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2006;260:63–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kanyuka K, Ward E, Adams MJ. Polymyxa graminis and the cereal viruses it transmits: a research challenge. Molecular Plant Pathology. 2003;4:393–406. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00177.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Karling JS. The Plasmodiophorales. 2nd completely revised edition Hafner Publishing Company; New York, NY, USA: 1968. p. 256. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirchmair M, Neuhauser S, Huber L. Sorosphaera viticola sp. nov (Plasmodiophorids), an intracellular parasite in roots of grapevine. Sydowia. 2005a;57:223–232. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirchmair M, Neuhauser S, Scholz C, Huber L. Sorosphaera viticola nom. prov., a newly discovered Plasmodiophorid, a potential vector for grapevine viruses? In: Rush C, editor. Proceedings of IWGPVFV 6th Symposium. American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists; Denver, CO, USA: 2005b. pp. 108–111. [Google Scholar]
  14. López-García P, Moreira D. Tracking microbial biodiversity through molecular and genomic ecology. Research in Microbiology. 2008;159:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Massee G. Vine diseases. Garden Chronicle. 1893;14:282. [Google Scholar]
  16. Merz U. Powdery scab of potato – occurrence, life-cycle and epidemiology. American Journal of Potato Research. 2008;4:241–246. [Google Scholar]
  17. Neuhauser S, Huber L, Kirchmair M. Sorosphaera veronicae, neu für Österreich. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Pilzkunde. 2005;14:303–307. in German. [Google Scholar]
  18. Speschnew NN. Materiali dlya isutscheniya mikologicheskoi flori Kavkasa. Fungi parasitici Transcaucasici novi aut minus cogniti. Trudy Tiflisskogo Botan. Sada. 1901;5(1900):1–14. in Russian. [Google Scholar]
  19. Varrelmann M. Occurrence, spread and pathogenicity of different forms of the Rhizomania virus (Beet necrotic yellow vein virus, BNYVV) – Review on biology and variability of rhizomania and on detection of isolates possibly overcoming resistance. Zuckerindustrie. 2007;132:113–120. [Google Scholar]
  20. Viala P, Sauvageau C. Sur la brunissure, maladie de la vigne causée par le Plasmodiophora vitis. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences. 1892a;114:1558–1560. [Google Scholar]
  21. Viala P, Sauvageau C. Sur la maladie de Californie, maladie de la vigne causée par le Plasmodiophora californica. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences. 1892b;115:67–69. [Google Scholar]
  22. Woronin M. Plasmodiophora brassicae. Urheber der Kohlpflanzen Hernie. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaftliche Botanik. 1878;11:548–574. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES