Abstract
Micafungin, a new echinocandin antifungal agent, has been widely used for the treatment of various fungal infections in human populations. Micafungin is predominantly cleared by biliary excretion and it binds extensively to plasma proteins (>99.5%). Micafungin body weight-adjusted clearance is higher in neonates than in adults, but the mechanisms underlying this difference are not understood. Previous work had revealed the roles of sinusoidal uptake (Na+-taurocholate co-transporting peptide, NTCP; organic anion transporting polypeptide, OATP) as well as canalicular efflux (bile salt export pump, BSEP; breast cancer resistance protein, BCRP) transporters in micafungin hepatobiliary elimination. In the present study, the relative protein expression of hepatic transporters was compared between liver homogenates from neonates and adults. Also, the extent of micafungin binding to serum from neonates and adults was measured in vitro. The results indicate that relative expression levels of NTCP, OATP1B1/3, BSEP, BCRP, and MRP3 were similar in neonates and in adults. However, micafungin fraction unbound (fu) in neonatal serum was about 8-fold higher than in adult serum (0.033 ± 0.012 versus 0.004 ± 0.001, respectively). While there was no evidence for different intrinsic hepatobiliary clearance of micafungin between neonates and adults, our data suggest that age-dependent serum protein binding of micafungin is responsible for its higher clearance in neonates compared to adults.
Keywords: micafungin, pediatric drug disposition, serum binding, clearance prediction, antifungal
Introduction
Micafungin is a new semi-synthetic echinocandin-type antifungal drug that has been widely used for the treatment of various fungal infections in human populations. Pharmacokinetic studies with 14C-micafungin determined that approximately 90% of the plasma clearance occurs via biliary elimination of the parent drug [1], whereas urinary excretion is a minor elimination route in human and rat [2–4]. Like caspofungin and anidulafungin, micafungin is a peptide-like compound. Due to the presence of a sulfate group, micafungin is negatively charged at physiological pH (see Figure 1). Micafungin displays high plasma protein binding (>99%) in humans and animals [4].
Figure 1.
Micafungin chemical structure
Pharmacokinetic parameters of micafungin were determined in several human age groups: neonates < 1 month old, children <8 years of age, adolescents, and adults [5, 6]. Micafungin was found to have a higher body weight-adjusted clearance in neonates than older groups. The necessity to use higher body-weight adjusted doses in neonates in order to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations was recently confirmed by a population pharmacokinetic analysis [7]. As of today, no studies have been conducted to elucidate the cause of this age-difference in the disposition of micafungin in humans.
In order to obtain better insight in the age-dependent disposition of micafungin, it was crucial to first understand the clearance mechanisms in the adult population. In this context, we have recently conducted in vitro transport studies with micafungin in sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes (SCHH) [8], which revealed the following: a) the sinusoidal uptake transporter Na+-taurocholate co-transporting peptide (NTCP, SLC10A1) and the canalicular efflux transporter Bile Salt Export Pump (BSEP, ABCB11) were found to mediate the hepatobiliary disposition of micafungin; b) Breast Cancer Resistance Protein (BCRP, ABCG2), Multidrug Resistance Associated Protein 3 (MRP3, ABCC3), and Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide (OATP, SLCO) were found to modestly associate with the disposition of micafungin in SCHH; c) by using B-CLEAR® technology (Qualyst Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC) [9–11], in vivo plasma and biliary clearance of micafungin were calculated based on the in vitro data obtained in SCHH and found to be in agreement with the clinical data. Because of ethical considerations, it is almost impossible to obtain fresh liver tissue from neonates suitable for establishing SCHH, which would support investigating transporter-mediated disposition of micafungin and predicting in vivo hepatobiliary clearance like in adults. However, it was possible to obtain frozen liver tissue samples from neonates (and adults) to support determining the protein expression of hepatic drug transporters. In addition, because protein binding is known to influence drug distribution and drug clearance, and because it is variable as a function of age [12–15], the extent of micafungin serum binding in neonates was determined in vitro.
In this study, we calculated in vivo hepatobiliary clearance of micafungin in neonates based on: a) the in vitro intrinsic clearance in adults as determined previously [8]; b) scaling factors applicable for human neonatal liver; and c) micafungin fraction unbound in serum of neonates. We showed that the calculated in vivo plasma and biliary clearance in neonates are in agreement to those observed in clinic. Our data provide evidence for the mechanism underlying higher clearance of micafungin in neonates compared to adults.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and Reagents
Micafungin–sodium was a gift from Dr. John Perfect at Duke University. Serum samples from neonates or adult (n=6/group) were provided by Dr. Daniel Benjamin at Duke Center Research Institute. Frozen liver from neonates and adults (5 samples per group) were obtained from the Comparative Human Tissue Network (CHTN) (Columbus, OH) under an approved UNC-Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board protocol. NuPAGE 4–20% Bis-Tris gel and all other gel electrophoresis and Western blot reagents and supplies were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Primary antibodies against human BSEP [ABCB11] (F-6), NTCP [SLC10A1] (M-130) and OATP1B1 [SLCO1B1] (and OATP1B3 [SLCO1B3] to a lesser extent) (N-16) were purchased from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA), while those against MRP3 [ABCC3] (M3II-9), BCRP [ABCG2] (BXP-53), and GAPDH were purchased from Alexis (San Diego, CA). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody suitable for each primary antibody and the chemi-luminescent substrate SuperSignal® West Dura were purchased from Pierce Chemical (Rockford, IL).
Protein Expression of Drug Transporters in Liver Tissues from Neonates and Adults
Frozen liver tissues from neonates (postnatal age 0–1 month), and from adults (older than 18 years) were homogenized in 1.15% KCL buffer, pH 7.4 (1:3, w/v) and crude homogenates were prepared after centrifugation at 800 rpm for 3 min. Protein concentration in crude liver homogenates was determined by the bicinchoninic acid method against bovine serum albumin standard, and homogenates at 1mg/ml were prepared in sample buffer containing a protease inhibitors cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Western blot analysis for the expression of transport proteins was performed by separating the transport proteins in liver homogenate samples loaded on SDS page gel (20 μl/well) with gel electrophoresis and the proteins were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes according to the vendor’s instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Primary antibodies against human NTCP, BSEP, OATP1B1/3, MRP3, BCRP, GAPDH were appropriately diluted (1:200, 1:200, 1:200, 1:200, 1:500, and 1:4000, respectively) and incubated with the membrane for 2 hr at 37°C. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody suitable for each primary antibody was cross-reacted with the transporter protein-primary antibody complex; immunoreactive protein bands were detected using a Bio-Rad VersaDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). For quantitative determination of protein expression, three density measurements of each band corresponding to BSEP, OATP1B1/3, MRP3, BCRP, GAPDH (molecular weight 190 kDa, 90 kDa, 170 kDa, 70 kDa, 35 kDa, respectively) were determined and the mean density was normalized to the mean density of the GAPDH band (used to adjust expression based on actual loaded protein samples). Relative expression of the four transporters to GAPDH in each liver homogenate sample in the neonatal or adult group was determined for each of the five liver homogenate samples per group. The mean was expressed per kg body weight based on the following scaling parameters: 35 and 70 mg protein/gram liver in neonates and adult (experimentally determined), respectively; 120 g and 1500 g average liver weight in neonates or adult (data listed by Björkman [16]), respectively; 3 kg and 70 kg average body weight in neonates and adult (data listed by Björkman [16]), respectively. The relative protein expression in neonates was expressed as percent of the mean expression in adult samples.
Micafungin Serum Fraction Unbound in Neonates and Adults
Micafungin fraction unbound in serum from human neonates or adults was determined by equilibrium dialysis according to a modified method described by Kalvass and Maurer [17]. Briefly, Spectra/Por® 2 dialysis membranes (Spectrum Laboratories Inc., Rancho Dominguez, CA) were conditioned in water for 15 min, followed by 30% ethanol for 15 min, and sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4) for 15 min. Serum samples from neonates (prenatal age 23–40 weeks of gestation; postnatal age 1–52 days; body weight 0.6–3.5 kg) (n=6) or adults (n=6) were spiked with micafungin (10 μM) and 70 μl aliquots of each sample were loaded into a 96-well equilibrium dialysis apparatus (HTDialysis, Gales Ferry, CT) and dialyzed against an equal volume of sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4). The 96-well equilibrium dialysis apparatus was incubated for 4.5 hr with orbital shaking (100 rpm) at 37°C. These equilibrium dialysis conditions were found to be sufficient for micafungin to reach equilibrium. Aliquots from dialyzed samples (serum side and buffer side) were processed and the concentrations of extracted micafungin in both serum and buffer matrices were determined based on calibration curves of micafungin prepared in the corresponding matrix. Micafungin fu was determined according to Equation 1.
Analytical Method
An HPLC method was developed to separate micafungin and diclofenac (internal standard) using a C8 XTerra® column (3 × 100 mm, 3.5μ Waters); a linear gradient of mobile phase A:B (v/v) was used starting from 70:30 at 0 min to 5:95 in 9 minutes at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min, where (A) was 5 mM ammonium acetate with 0.1% formic acid, pH 4.0, and (B) was acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid. Micafungin was detected by fluorescence emission at 464 nm (excitation at 273 nm), while diclofenac was detected by UV at 280 nm; the retention times were 5.5 min for micafungin and 6.3 min for diclofenac. The method was linear for a micafungin concentration range of 0.1–5 μM. Accuracy and precision of the method were 12% and 3.3% for 0.3 μM and 0.2% and 2.8% for 2.5 μM, respectively.
Data Analysis
Micafungin fu was determined from the following equation:
(Equation 1) |
The fu values in six neonates were plotted against the age of gestation at birth (in weeks) or against postnatal age at birth (in days) of each subject.
In vivo micafungin plasma and biliary clearance values were predicted based on previously obtained in vitro data [8], and the serum binding data obtained in the present study. The in vitro intrinsic biliary clearance (ml/min/mg protein) and in vitro intrinsic accumulation clearance were first scaled to kg body weight using the parameters listed in Table 1 as published by Björkman et al. [16]. In the absence of albumin during in vitro incubations [8], unbound intrinsic biliary clearance (intrinsic Cl′biliary) and unbound intrinsic plasma clearance (intrinsic Cl′plasma) were assumed to correspond to in vitro intrinsic biliary clearance and in vitro intrinsic accumulation clearance, respectively. The calculated in vivo biliary clearance (Clbiliary) and in vivo plasma (accumulation) clearance (Clplasma) values were calculated according to the well-stirred model of hepatic disposition, assuming a micafungin blood/plasma concentration ratio of 1:
(Equation 2) |
(Equation 3) |
where QH represents the hepatic plasma flow rate. The QH values in neonate and adult are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Calculation of in vivo Plasma and Biliary Clearance of Micafungin in Adults and Neonates
Physiological Parameters & Scaling Factors | Adult* | Neonate |
---|---|---|
fu | 0.004 | 0.033 |
mg protein/g liver | 71 | 24** |
g liver/kg body weight | 26 | 43*** |
QH, ml/min/kg | 21 | 73*** |
Observed Plasma Cl (ml/min/kg) | 0.229 | 0.622# |
Intrinsic Accumulation Cl (ml/min/mg) | 0.024 ± 0.002 | 0.024 ± 0.002 |
Intrinsic Plasma Cl (ml/min/kg) | 43.4 ± 3.0 | 24.3 ± 2.6 |
Calculated Plasma Cl (ml/min/kg) | 0.175 ± 0.012 | 0.793 ± 0.085 |
Observed Biliary Cl (ml/min/kg) | 0.160 | Unknown |
Intrinsic Biliary Cl (ml/min/mg) | 0.014 ± 0.009 | 0.014 ± 0.012 |
Intrinsic Biliary Cl (ml/min/kg) | 25.5 ± 15.7 | 14.3 ± 8.8 |
Calculated Biliary Cl (ml/min/kg) | 0.101 ± 0.062 | 0.467 ± 0.287 |
Statistical Analysis
An unpaired t-test (assuming unequal variance) was performed to determine the significance of the difference in micafungin fu between neonates and adults.
Results
Protein Expression of Drug Transporters in Liver Tissues from Neonates and Adults
The immunostaining bands corresponding to NTCP, BSEP, BCRP, MRP3, and the hepatic isoforms belonging to the OATP1B subfamily in five neonatal liver homogenate samples (N1–N5) and in five adult liver homogenate samples (A1–A5) are shown in the upper part of Figure 2. As illustrated in the lower panel of Figure 2, the protein expression levels of these transporters in neonates, relative to GAPDH and expressed per kg body weight, were between 84 and 115% of adult levels. No statistically significant differences were observed in transporter expression levels between neonates and adults.
Figure 2.
Expression of Transporter Proteins in Liver from Human Neonates and Adults. Western blot analysis on liver homogenates from neonates and adults was used to determine the relative expression of hepatic transporters involved in micafungin uptake and biliary excretion. The top parts of panel A and panel B depict the protein expression bands in five neonate samples (N1–N5) and in five adult samples (A1–A5) for uptake and efflux transport proteins, respectively. GAPDH protein expression was measured for normalization. The bottom parts of both panels represent the mean (± SD) of GAPDH-normalized expression of the transporters in neonates (per kg body weight) relative to protein expression (per kg body weight) in adults where adult expression is 100%. Samples N3 and A5 were excluded from densitometric analysis for NTCP due to irregular band shape.
Serum Fraction Unbound of Micafungin in Neonates and Adults
Using equilibrium dialysis, micafungin fu was determined as function of time and drug concentration (data not shown). In neonates, the mean fu from six different neonatal samples conducted at three different days was found to be 0.033 ± 0.017 (96.7% bound) compared to a mean fu value of 0.004 ± 0.003 (99.6% bound) in adult (Figure 3). The difference of fu between neonates and adults is statistically significant (P <0.001). Figure 4 illustrates the individual fu values in neonates along with the postgestational age at birth as well as the postnatal age. The highest fu was observed for the full term subjects 1 and 3 (40 weeks postgestation), while lower fu values were found for premature subjects 2 and 4 (24 and 31 weeks of gestation, respectively). The lowest micafungin fu was observed for subject 2, which is not only the most premature, but also the oldest (52 days after birth) baby.
Figure 3.
Micafungin Fraction Unbound in Serum from Human Neonates Compared to Adults. Fraction unbound in serum from neonates and adults was determined by equilibrium dialysis as discussed in the methods section. Bars represent the mean (±SD) of values from 6 subjects/group. Statistical significance indicated by ***, P <0.001 based on the unpaired t-test (unequal variance).
Figure 4.
Micafungin Fraction Unbound in Serum from Neonates. Grey triangles (▲) represent the fu (mean ± SD for three determinations) of micafungin in each subject. Each subject’s postnatal age (◆) or postgestational age at birth (■) are also plotted. The mean value of fu for the six subjects is represented by a dashed line (--).
These results indicate that micafungin fu in neonate serum is higher than in adult serum. These results also indicated that, while there appears to be a weak relationship between postgestational age at birth and fu, there is no evidence for a relationship between postnatal age in neonates and fu.
Prediction of in vivo Plasma and Biliary Clearance of Micafungin in Neonates
In vitro intrinsic accumulation Cl and in vitro intrinsic biliary Cl of micafungin have recently been determined using sandwich-cultured human hepatocytes from adult liver donors [8], and were 23.5 ± 1.6 and 14.0 ± 9.0 μl/min/mg, respectively. To estimate in vitro intrinsic clearance values for micafungin in neonates, in vitro intrinsic clearance values of adults were used, given that expressions of drug transporters associated with the clearance of micafungin in neonates and adults were comparable (Figure 2). As illustrated in Table 1, intrinsic clearance values were scaled to in vivo intrinsic clearance using neonate-based scaling factors as reported [16, 18]. In vivo intrinsic clearance values were then used to calculate in vivo clearance values based on the well-stirred model (Equation 2 and Equation 3), taking into account micafungin fu (as determined in the present study) as well as adult/neonatal values for QH. The results shown in Table 1 illustrate a good agreement between the observed and calculated plasma clearance values. In addition, the calculated clearance values in neonates were 3-fold higher than in adults as it has been observed in clinic.
Discussion
Micafungin, which is used to treat life-threatening fungal CNS infection in neonates and young infants, is mainly cleared into the bile [1]. Surprisingly, the clearance of micafungin in neonates, the human population generally displaying immature drug metabolizing enzymes and drug transporter function, is reported to be three times that of adults. Because it undergoes biliary clearance, we hypothesized that the higher clearance of micafungin in neonates might be due to the higher drug uptake and/or secretion by sinusoidal and canalicular liver transporters. The transporters that mediate the uptake and secretion of micafungin were identified in our previous in vitro mechanistic study using human sandwich-cultured hepatocytes prepared from fresh liver of adult donors [8]. These in vitro data confirmed the unique utility of this in vitro model system in exploring the mechanisms of hepatic uptake and biliary excretion of endogenous and exogenous compounds and in predicting in vivo biliary clearance of drugs [9–11, 19–22]. In our previous study, we have indeed reported that in in vitro hepatic accumulation of micafungin in adult human hepatocytes occurred mainly by transporter-mediated mechanisms. The uptake of micafungin into the hepatocytes was mediated by NTCP ≫ OATP, whereas the biliary excretion involved the canalicular transporters BSEP > BCRP. The results also suggested a role for the sinusoidal efflux transporter MRP3, in the hepatic disposition of micafungin.
Unfortunately, because of ethical considerations, it is nearly impossible to obtain human neonatal liver tissue suitable for establishing hepatocyte cultures. Therefore, we considered another approach to obtain better insight into the age-dependent clearance of micafungin. By measuring the protein expression of NTCP, BSEP, BCRP, MRP3 and both hepatic OATP1B isoforms in neonatal versus adult liver homogenates, we pursued to make a semi-quantitative assessment regarding the possible age-dependent activity of these transporters. A few studies on the ontogeny of transporter expression and function have indeed demonstrated that transporter protein expression levels correlate with function. For example, in a developmental mouse model, Pinto et al. [23] showed that digoxin accumulation in brain, kidney, and liver agreed with the expression level of the Mdr1a gene encoding for the P-gp efflux transporter in an age-dependent manner. Goralski et al. [24] have shown an agreement between the expression and function of transporters by demonstrating that deficient Mdr1a/b expression in neonatal mouse brain resulted in enhanced accumulation of digoxin and cyclosporin in neonatal mice compared to adult mice. As mentioned earlier, we have previously shown that micafungin is predominantly relying on the bile salt transporters NTCP and BSEP for its hepatobiliary elimination. At the uptake level, our data support comparable expression of the main micafungin transporter NTCP between neonates and adults. Previous work by Hardikar et al. [25] in rats, indicated that Ntcp protein was expressed as early as postnatal day 1, and the expression levels on day 1 and day 7 (equivalent to 1 month human neonate) postnatal liver were also comparable to those in adults. Furthermore, as shown in this study (see Figure 2), also BSEP exhibits comparable expression in neonates and in adults. This result was consistent with previous data on quantitative expression of BSEP and other canalicular transport proteins in human fetal, pediatric and adult livers [26, 27]. In these studies, the authors reported that BSEP protein was expressed in fetus and pediatric human liver at the same level as adult, however, in fetus, the localization of BSEP was found to be at both the canalicular and cytosolic locations. In general, very limited information on the ontogeny of drug transporters in human, not only at the functional level, but also at the expression level has been obtained. Studies on the age-dependent expression and localization of MDR1/P-gp in human brain [28] and small intestine [29] are exceptions. In the rat, Gao et al. observed that the canalicular transporter Bsep was detected at the canalicular membrane before birth but reached adult expression levels by postnatal day 12 (day 7 in neonatal rat is equivalent to neonate in human) [30]. The authors indicated that by day 12, hepatocytes were fully polarized and localization of transporters (at either canalicular or sinusoidal membranes) was comparable to what was observed in adult hepatocytes. They also reported that the development of polarized hepatocyte membranes and expression of major bile salt transporters Bsep and Ntcp occurs shortly before birth and that correlated with the development of the enterohepatic circulation of bile salts. Therefore, full development of this excretion route early in neonatal life indicates that age-dependent expression (and thus function) of these transporters may not explain the age-dependent clearance of micafungin. It follows that the similarity in the expression of these transporters between neonates and adults can confidently be used to quantitatively estimate micafungin hepatic clearance in neonates, based on the in vitro intrinsic uptake and biliary clearance that we previously measured for adults.
Because protein binding is known to affect drug clearance, especially of those drugs that possess high protein binding like micafungin, we measured fu of micafungin in vitro in serum from neonates and adults; as mentioned in the results section, we observed a significantly higher unbound fraction in neonates. McNamara and Alcorn [12] have shown that for lipophilic drugs, ~ 2-fold higher fu values can be expected in pediatric plasma compared to adults based on lower plasma protein concentrations in neonates than in adults. However, the model that was developed by McNamara and Alcorn [12] under-predicted the fu value of micafungin in neonates compared to the value we have experimentally measured in the present study using in vitro equilibrium dialysis in neonate serum. One explanation for the 8-fold higher fu in neonates compared to adult could be that micafungin binds not only to plasma proteins [more likely to albumin than gamma-globulin (31)], but also to lipoproteins, cholesterol, or other serum components that were found to be higher in adult serum than in neonate serum [12,15]. Furthermore, the physicochemical properties of a peptide like micafungin differ substantially from those of the model drugs used to establish the model obtained by McNamara and Alcorn [12]. Due to limited availability of clinical pharmacokinetic data in neonates, it is presently unclear to what extent lower protein binding (higher free fraction in the blood) in neonates versus adults is a more common reason for enhanced drug clearance in neonates. In addition, in contrast to what we have presently observed for micafungin, the enzyme or transporter-mediated elimination pathways of many drugs show pronounced age-dependency [32–34], thus complicating the interpretation of possible effects of altered protein binding on overall in vivo drug elimination. Caspofungin, which is another echinocandin antimycotic, also shows a small unbound fraction in blood (about 3.5%) [35]. However, in contrast to micafungin, caspofungin clearance in neonates (< 3 months) is significantly lower as compared to older children (2-11y) and, to a lesser extent, as compared to adults [36]. For this reason, the caspofungin recommended dose (normalized for body surface area) in neonates is about half the dose used in adults. While the caspofungin free fraction in neonate serum has not been measured, there is clearly no evidence that reduced caspofungin serum binding in neonates plays an important role in altered caspofungin disposition in this age group. The immunosuppressant cyclosporin A is another cyclic peptide exhibiting low unbound fraction in blood as well as age-dependent pharmacokinetics, with 2-fold lower oral clearance in neonates compared to older children and adults [37]. However, cyclosporin A shows a complex binding profile in plasma (mainly to lipoproteins) as well as in blood (distribution to erythrocytes) [38], while the ontogeny of this behavior has not been investigated. From a more general point of view, the clinical relevance of plasma protein binding alterations (most often considered from a binding competition perspective) as a mechanism underlying drug clearance differences should not be overestimated [39–40]. Nevertheless, the 8-fold increase in unbound micafungin in neonates as compared to adults is substantial, especially in light of the less pronounced effects reported previously for a list of more than 25 drugs [12]. In this list, the largest differences were reported for propranolol, quinidine and verapamil, which all exhibited 3–4 fold increased unbound fractions in neonates compared to adults. Unfortunately, clinical PK data in children, especially neonates, are very limited or lacking. In the case of verapamil, Piovan et al. [41] reported plasma levels of verapamil and its metabolite norverapamil in children between 15 days and 17 years. Their data demonstrated gradually increasing norverapamil/verapamil levels from birth onwards to reach a plateau by the age of 1 year, which then remained constant until adulthood. There was no evidence for any effect of an increased free verapamil fraction on verapamil clearance in neonates as compared to older children. This further suggests that for many drugs, altered plasma protein binding in neonates does not have a substantial impact on clearance. In addition, even when some effect would exist, it may not be easily observed due to concomitant changes in activity of drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters [32–34].
As we have indicated in the results section (Table 1), the in vivo plasma clearance and biliary clearance values we calculated for micafungin in neonates were found to be three times those in adults, thus mirroring the difference in clearance between neonates and adults observed in the clinic. Since the calculated in vivo clearance was based on the adult intrinsic clearance values, the higher fu value of micafungin in neonates, is the factor that explains the higher in vivo clearance of micafungin in neonates. According to the well-stirred model applied here, neither the different relative liver protein content (mg/kg body weight) nor the higher QH in neonates, contributed to the higher in vivo clearance of micafungin in neonates.
To summarize, similar protein expression of liver drug transporters, but higher fu of micafungin in neonates compared to adults have been determined by using in vitro methods and biological samples from both age groups. The in vivo plasma and biliary clearance in neonates calculated based on in vitro transport data of adults generated by SCHH indicated that fu may be the key contributor to the higher clearance of micafungin observed in neonates, however a definitive conclusion could not be made with the results that have been presented in this study. For instance, a possible role of one or more transporters that differ from those identified in adults may still be involved in micafungin disposition in neonatal liver. In addition, we assumed that neonates display no additional enzymatic clearance mechanisms for micafungin as compared to adults. However, Hope et al. [7] recently reported that substantially higher levels of the metabolite M5 were measured in neonates as compared to adults. It is clear that the existence of a neonate-specific metabolic pathway for micafungin could also contribute to its higher clearance, but further research is required in this respect. The extent of renal excretion of micafungin (and/or) metabolites in neonates has not been measured. However, based on mass balance data obtained in adults, and based on the fact that no dose adjustments are needed in patients with renal impairment [7], renal micafungin elimination was demonstrated to play a very minor role as opposed to fecal elimination. This suggests that the several fold higher clearance in neonates compared to adults is unlikely to be due to (much) enhanced renal clearance in neonates compared to adults. Future non-clinical work in sandwich-cultured hepatocytes from juvenile animals or using apical and basolateral membrane vesicles prepared from human neonatal frozen liver should be conducted in order to ultimately understand all mechanisms underlying altered micafungin disposition in neonates.
Acknowledgments
Financial support: Financial support by NICHD (NCC-PPRU 5U10 HD045962-04), FWO Vlaanderen and Onderzoeksraad K.U. Leuven is acknowledged. Dr. Benjamin receives support from the United States Government for his work in pediatric and neonatal clinical pharmacology (1R01HD057956-02, 1R01FD003519-01, 1U10-HD45962-06, 1K24HD058735-01, and Government Contract HHSN267200700051C), the nonprofit organization Thrasher Research Foundation for his work in neonatal candidiasis (http://www.thrasherresearch.org), and from industry for neonatal and pediatric drug development (http://www.dcri.duke.edu/research/coi.jsp).
Abbreviations
- BCRP
Breast Cancer Resistance Protein
- BSEP
Bile Salt Export Pump
- Cl
Clearance
- fu
fraction of drug unbound
- HPLC
High Performance Liquid Chromatography
- MRP2 and MRP3
Multidrug Resistance-associated Protein 2 and 3
- NTCP
Na+-Taurocholate Co-transporting Peptide
- OATP
Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide
- P-gp
P-glycoprotein
- QH
hepatic blood flow
- SCHH
Sandwich-Cultured Human Hepatocytes
References
- 1.Hebert MF, Townsend RW, Austin S, Balan G, Blough DK, Buell D, Keirns J, Bekersky I. Concomitant cyclosporine and micafungin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45:954–960. doi: 10.1177/0091270005278601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kaneko H, Yamato Y, Teramura Y, Fujiwara T, Suzuki A, Kawarura A, Terakawa M, Kagayama A. Metabolites of micafungin in rats and dogs. Jpn J Chemother. 2002;50 (Suppl. 1):88–93. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yamato Y, Kaneko H, Hashimoto T, Katashima M, Ishibashi K, Kawarura A, Terakawa M, Kagayama A. Pharmacokinetics of the antifungal drug micafungin in mice, rats and dogs, and its in vitro protein binding and distribution to blood cells. Jpn J Chemother. 2002;50 (Suppl. 1):74–79. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carver PL. Micafungin. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:1707–1721. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heresi GP, Gerstmann DR, Reed MD, van den Anker JN, Blumer JL, Kovanda L, Keirns JJ, Buell DN, Kearn GL. The pharmacokinetics and safety of micafungin, a novel echinocandin, in premature infants. Pediatr Infect Dis. 2006;25:1110–1115. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000245103.07614.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wiederhold NP, Lewis JS., 2nd The echinocandin micafungin: a review of the pharmacology, spectrum of activity, clinical efficacy and safety. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007;8:1155–1166. doi: 10.1517/14656566.8.8.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hope WW, Smith PB, Arrieta A, Buell DN, Roy M, Kaibara A, Walsh TJ, Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Benjamin DK., Jr Population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in neonates and young infants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:2633–2637. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01679-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yanni SB, Augustijns P, Benjamin DK, Jr, Brouwer KLR, Thakker DR, Annaert PP. In vitro investigation of the hepatobiliary disposition mechanisms of the antifungal agent micafungin in humans and rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:1848–1856. doi: 10.1124/dmd.110.033811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoffmaster KA, Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ, Pollack GM, Brouwer KLR. Hepatobiliary disposition of the metabolically stable opioid peptide [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]-enkephalin (DPDPE): pharmacokinetic consequences of the interplay between multiple transport systems. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;311:1203–1210. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.070201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu X, Chism JP, LeCluyse EL, Brouwer KR, Brouwer KLR. Correlation of biliary excretion in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes and in vivo in rats. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999;27:637–644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ghibellini G, Vasist LS, Leslie EM, Heizer WD, Kowalsky RJ, Calvo BF, Brouwer KLR. In vitro-in vivo correlation of hepatobiliary drug clearance in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;81:406–413. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McNamara P, Alcorn J. Protein binding predictions in infants. Pharm Sci. 2002;4:1–8. doi: 10.1208/ps040104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lombardo F, Obach RS, Shalaeva MY, Gao F. Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data. J Med Chem. 2002;45:2867–2876. doi: 10.1021/jm0200409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fukuda H, Ohashi R, Tsuda-Tsukimoto M, Tamai I. Effect of plasma protein binding on in vitro-in vivo correlation of biliary excretion of drugs evaluated by sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008;36:1275–1282. doi: 10.1124/dmd.107.019026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Benedetti MS, Whomsley R, Eugene Baltes LE. Differences in absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of xenobiotics between the paediatric and adult Populations. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2005;1:447–471. doi: 10.1517/17425255.1.3.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Björkman S. Prediction of drug disposition in infants and children by means of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling: theophylline and midazolam as model drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;59:691–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02225.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kalvass JC, Maurer TS. Influence of nonspecific brain and plasma binding on CNS exposure: implications for rational drug discovery. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2002;23:327–338. doi: 10.1002/bdd.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barter ZE, Bayliss MK, Beaune PH, Boobis AR, Carlile DJ, Edwards RJ, Houston BJ, Lake BG, Lipscomb JC, Pelkonen OR, Tucker GT, Rostami-Hodjegan A. Scaling factors for the extrapolation of in vivo metabolic drug clearance from in vitro data: reaching a consensus on values of human microsomal protein and hepatocellularity per gram of liver. Curr Drug Metab. 2007;8:33–45. doi: 10.2174/138920007779315053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chandra P, Lecluyse EL, Brouwer KLR. Optimization of culture conditions for determining hepatobiliary disposition of taurocholate in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2001;37:380–385. doi: 10.1007/BF02577575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Annaert PP, Brouwer KLR. Assessment of drug interactions in hepatobiliary transport using rhodamine 123 in sandwich-cultured rat hepatocytes. Drug Metab Dispos. 2005;33:388–394. doi: 10.1124/dmd.104.001669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kemp DC, Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ, Brouwer KLR. Xenobiotics inhibit hepatic uptake and biliary excretion of taurocholate in rat hepatocytes. Toxicol Sci. 2005;83:207–214. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McRae MP, Lowe CM, Tian X, Bourdet DL, Ho RH, Leake BF, Kim RB, Brouwer KLR, Kashuba AD. Ritonavir, saquinavir, and efavirenz, but not nevirapine, inhibit bile acid transport in human and rat hepatocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2006;318:1068–1075. doi: 10.1124/jpet.106.102657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pinto N, Halachmi N, Verjee Z, Woodland C, Klein J, Koren G. Ontogeny of renal P-glycoprotein expression in mice: correlation with digoxin renal clearance. Pediatr Res. 2005;58:1284–1292. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000188697.99079.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Goralski KB, Acott PD, Fraser AD, Worth D, Sinal CJ. Brain cyclosporin A levels are determined by ontogenic regulation of mdr1a expression. Drug Metab Dispos. 2006;34:288–295. doi: 10.1124/dmd.105.007427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hardikar W, Ananthanarayanan M, Suchy FJ. Differential ontogenic regulation of basolateral and canalicular bile acid transport proteins in rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:20841–20846. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.35.20841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen HL, Chen HL, Liu YJ, Feng CH, Wu CY, Shyu MK, Yuan RH, Chang M. Developmental expression of canalicular transporter genes in human liver. J Hepatol. 2005;43:472–477. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen HL, Liu YJ, Feng CH, Wu CY, Shyu MK, Yuan RH, Chang MH. Expression of hepatocyte transporters and nuclear receptors in children with early and late-stage biliary atresia. Pediatr Res. 2008;63:15–21. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e318170a6b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Daood M, Tsai C, Ahdab-Barmada M, Watchko JF. ABC transporter (P-gp/ABCB1, RP1/ABCC1, BCRP/ABCG2) expression in the developing human CNS. Neuropediatrics. 2008;39:211–218. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fakhoury M, Lecordier J, Medard Y, Peuchmaur M, Jacqz-Agrain E. Impact of inflammation on the duodenal mRNA expression of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein in children with Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;12:745–749. doi: 10.1097/00054725-200608000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gao B, Pierre MV, Stieger B, Meier PJ. Differential expression of bile salt and organic anion transporters in developing rat liver. J Hepatol. 2004;41:201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Abe F, Ueyama J, Kawasumi N, Nadai M, Hayashi T, Kato M, Ohnishi M, Saito H, Takeyama N, Hasegawa T. Role of plasma proteins in pharmacokinetics of micafungin, an antifungal antibiotic, in analbuminemic rats. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3454–3460. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00396-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Anderson BJ, Allegaert K. The pharmacology of anaesthetics in the neonate. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010;24:419–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2010.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Anderson GD, Lynn AM. Optimizing pediatric dosing: a developmental pharmacologic approach. Pharmacotherapy. 2009;29:680–90. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.6.680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yanni SB, Annaert PP, Augustijns P, Ibrahim JG, Benjamin DK, Jr, Thakker DR. In vitro hepatic metabolism explains higher clearance of voriconazole in children versus adults: role of CYP2C19 and flavin-containing monooxygenase. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:25–31. doi: 10.1124/dmd.109.029769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Stone JA, Xu X, Winchell GA, Deutsch PJ, Pearson PG, Migoya EM, Mistry GC, Xi L, Miller A, Sandhu P, Singh R, deLuna F, Dilzer SC, Lasseter KC. Disposition of caspofungin: role of distribution in determining pharmacokinetics in plasma. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:815–23. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.3.815-823.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sáez-Llorens X, Macias M, Maiya P, Pineros J, Jafri HS, Chatterjee A, Ruiz G, Raghavan J, Bradshaw SK, Kartsonis NA, Sun P, Strohmaier KM, Fallon M, Bi S, Stone JA, Chow JW. Pharmacokinetics and safety of caspofungin in neonates and infants less than 3 months of age. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:869–75. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00868-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Regazzi M, Perotti G, Pellegrini C, Molinaro MD, Tzialla C, Cabano R, D’Armini AM, Stronati M, Viganò M. Two-year follow-up of the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs in a neonate who underwent heart transplantation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22 (Suppl 3):108–10. doi: 10.1080/14767050903181278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Akhlaghi F, Trull AK. Distribution of cyclosporin in organ transplant recipients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41:615–37. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241090-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rolan PE. Plasma protein binding displacement interactions--why are they still regarded as clinically important? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;37:125–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04251.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Benet LZ, Hoener BA. Changes in plasma protein binding have little clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002;71:115–21. doi: 10.1067/mcp.2002.121829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Piovan D, Padrini R, Svalato Moreolo G, Magnolfi G, Milanesi O, Zordan R, Pellegrino PA, Ferrari M. Verapamil and norverapamil plasma levels in infants and children during chronic oral treatment. Ther Drug Monit. 1995;17:60–7. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199502000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]