Skip to main content
International Orthopaedics logoLink to International Orthopaedics
. 2010 Jul 11;35(5):743–746. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1080-y

Road traffic injuries as seen in a Nigerian teaching hospital

Christian C Madubueze 1,, Christian O Onyebuchi Chukwu 1, Njoku I Omoke 1, Odion P Oyakhilome 1, Chidi Ozo 1
PMCID: PMC3080498  PMID: 20623283

Abstract

Trauma is a major problem in both developing and developed countries. World wide road-traffic injuries (RTIs) represent 25% of all trauma deaths. Injuries cause 12% of the global disease burden and are the third commonest cause of death globally. In our own environment, trauma is also important, with RTIs being a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. There is limited data on RTIs in West African countries, and this necessitated our study. We aimed to find common causative factors and proffer solutions. This was a one year prospective study examining all cases of trauma from RTIs seen at the Accident and Emergency Department of the Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital (EBSUTH), Abakaliki, Nigeria. Three hundred and sixty-three patients were studied. There was a male/female ratio of 3.4:1, with the modal age being 25 years. Most injuries involved motorcycles (54%). Passengers from cars and buses were also commonly affected (34.2%). Most of accidents occurred from head-on collisions (38.8%). Soft-tissue injuries and fractures accounted for 83.5% of injuries. The head and neck region was the commonest injury site (41.1%), and the most commonly fractured bones were the tibia and fibula (5.8%). Death occurred in 17 patients (4.7%), and 46 (12.7%) patients discharged themselves against medical advice. Improvements in road safety awareness, proper driver education—especially motorcycle drivers—and proper hospital care are needed in our subregion.

Introduction

Trauma is a major problem in both developing and developed countries. It is the fourth leading cause of death in all age groups and the leading cause in patients between one and 39 years in the USA [11]. Globally road-traffic accidents (RTIs) cause 25% of all trauma deaths [4]. Injuries represent 12% of the global disease burden and are the main cause of death between the ages of one and 40 years. Injuries are the third commonest cause of death globally [8]. In developing countries, trauma is also important, with RTIs being a leading cause of morbidity and mortality [3, 10]. Middle- and low-income countries are thought to bear up to 90% of the global injury burden [3]. Trauma outcomes have improved tremendously in regions that have evolved comprehensive trauma care systems [4]. Many of our centres have no such comprehensive trauma care systems, usually due to poor infrastructure, large numbers of uninsured patients and inadequately trained human resources. Also, roads are in bad condition, there is poor driving technique and poor road worthiness of many vehicles [6]. It is therefore important for us to examine the pattern of injuries in our environment. Our aim was to find common causative factors and proffer solutions.

Materials and methods

This was a one year prospective study of all patients with RTIs seen at the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department of EBSUTH from 1 March 2007 to 29 February 2008. EBSUTH is a 350-bed hospital situated along a major interstate highway and serves a population of about 8 million people. Data was taken using a proforma detailing biodata, presenting complaints, mechanism of injury and outcome of treatment in the A&E Department. Data analysis was done with Epi info version 3.4.3 and Quantitative Skills Software (SISA tables) from SISA website at http://www.quantitativeskills.com/manuals/tablesman.htm. Frequency tables, Fisher’s exact test and Pearson’s chi-square test of significance were used. Averages of means such as mode and mean [with standard deviation (SD)] were used to analyse the patient age pattern. Consent for the study was obtained from the hospital’s ethical committee.

Results

Three hundred and sixty-three patients were seen during the study period. Ages ranged from two to 81 years, with a mean of 29.39 ± 12.53 years. The modal age was 25 years. Most patients were between 15 and 40 years of age (269 cases, or 74.11%). There were 281 males and 82 females, with a male:female ratio of 3.4: 1 (Table 1). Injuries occurred on rural (interstate) and urban (intracity) roads with almost equal frequency with, 180 and 183 cases, respectively (Table 2).

Table 1.

Injuries sustained by gender

Injury sustained Female Percent Male Percent Total Percent
Fractures/dislocations 3 3.7 4 1.4 7 1.9
Soft tissue/fractures 4 4.9 39 13.9 43 11.8
Dislocations only 2 2.4 6 2.1 8 2.2
Fractures only 10 12.2 32 11.4 42 11.6
Soft tissue injury only 61 74.4 200 71.2 261 71.9
Others 2 2.4 0 0.0 2 0.6
Total 82 100 281 100 363 100

Pearson’s chi square: X2 = 12.993038 (p = 0.023444), Fisher’s exact test: two-sided p value for p[O >  = E|O < = E] = 0.022434

Table 2.

Type of vehicles and roads involved in injuries

Vehicle Intercity road Intracity road Total
No (%) No (%) No (%)
BICYCLE 2 0.55 1 0.28 3 0.8
MOTORCYCLE 50 13.77 141 38.84 191 52.6
CAR 36 9.92 8 2.2 44 12.1
MINIBUS 72 19.84 28 7.71 100 27.5
LUXURY BUS 3 0.83 0 0 3 0.8
LORRY/TRUCKS 12 3.31 2 0.55 14 3.9
UNKNOWN 5 1.38 3 0.83 8 2.2
Total 180 49.6 183 50.4 363 100

Pearson’s chi-square test: X2 = 91.491849 (p = 0.0000000), Fisher’s exact test: two sided p value for p[O> = E|O<=E] = 0.000000

Motorcycles were involved in 191 (52.6%) injuries, followed by commercial minibuses with 27.5% and cars with 12.1% (Table 2). On rural roads, minibuses were the most common causes, whereas motorcycles were the most common causes on urban roads. These findings were highly significant, with p values <0.001 for both Pearson chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Of the patients, passengers in cars/ buses accounted for 34.2%. Motorcycle drivers accounted for 26.7%, whereas motorcycle passengers were 18.5%. Pedestrians injured by motorcycles accounted for 8.8%. Most injuries were from head-on collisions (141 patients, or 38.8%). In 14.1%, the mechanism of injury was unknown. Pedestrian injuries, side collisions and vehicle somersaults were also important causes of injury, accounting for 12.4%, 12.1% and 11.6%, respectively (Table 3).

Table 3.

Mechanism of injuries

Mechanism of injury No of patients Proportion (%)
Head-on collision 141 38.8
Pedestrian injury 45 12.4
Side collision 44 12.1
Vehicle somersault 42 11.6
Vehicle veered off road 40 11.0
Others/unknown 51 14.1
Total 363 100

One hundred and twenty-five patients had multiple injuries (34.4%): 261 presented with soft-tissue injuries (71.9%); fractures were seen in 11.6%, but when associated with soft-tissue injury or dislocations, fractures occurred in 25.3% of all cases. These results were significant, with p < 0.05 (Table 1). Head and neck injuries were the most common, occurring in 181 patients (41.1%). Lower-limb injuries were also common, occurring in 113 patients (25.7%). Upper-limb injuries were next, with 22.1%, whereas chest and abdominal injuries occurred in 11.1% (Table 4).

Table 4.

Site of injuries

Site of injury No. of injuries Percent
Head/neck 181 41.1
Chest 41 9.3
Abdomen 8 1.8
Lower limbs 113 25.7
Upper limbs 97 22.1
Total 440 100

The commonest bones fractured were the tibia and fibula, which were seen in 21 (5.85%) cases. Two hundred and sixty-three patients were treated and discharged from the A&E Department (72.5%), 12.7% discharged against medical advice and 9.9% were admitted to the ward. Death occurred in 17 patients (4.7%).

Discussion

RTIs account for a large portion of trauma costs [10]. Males were more commonly affected than females. This, along with the mean age, was similar to most studies, as young adult males are most commonly involved in trauma [8, 12]. RTIs occurred with almost equal frequency on interstate and intracity roads. A study by the World Health Organization Europe found that 67% of injuries occurred on urban roads. [9] This difference with our findings may be due to the high incidence of motorcycle-associated injuries. Motorcycles are a commonly used method of transport in developing nations, and this includes rural roads [6]. However for intercity roads (rural), most commuters use minibuses in Nigeria. These are typically long-distance journeys, and minibuses are much cheaper over these distances. People injured on motorcycles were found to be a vulnerable group for more severe injuries in another study [5]. Our study noted that motorcycle drivers were more commonly injured than their passengers, unlike the commonly held notion here in Nigeria. However, this is similar to a study in Italy in which drivers were the most commonly injured irrespective of vehicle type [1]. In our study, passengers in four-wheeled vehicles, excepting trucks, were the largest single injured group. This correlated with another study done in Nigeria [12].

Most injuries were from head-on collisions. This was similar to a European study [1]. This may be due to the poor state of our roads causing drivers to swerve to avoid potholes. Also, poor driving technique coupled with impatience of drivers may be a major causative factor. Various studies have identified driver errors in the majority of injuries [9, 13]. We were unable to obtain reliable information on alcohol consumption, however, and this may be a limitation of our paper

Soft tissue injuries and fractures were the most common type of injuries seen, and this correlated with other studies [12]. The most common injury site was the head and neck. This also correlated with an Indian study [2], which was done on motorcycles, and we found a large number of motorcycle injuries in our study; this may account for the similar findings. More than a third of patients had multiple injuries. This was higher than that reported in a previous study done in Nigeria [12]. However, that study considered other injuries apart from RTIs. Tibia and fibula bones were the most common bone fractures in our study, and this was similar to results from other studies [7]. Mortality rate was 4.7%, which was within the expected worldwide range of 0.5–6%.

A large number of patients discharged themselves against medical advice. This was due to the widespread patronage of traditional and unorthodox healers in our environment.

Conclusion

Trauma associated with road transportation remains a significant problem in our environment, with motorcycles involved in more than half of the cases. The use of commercial motorcycles should be discouraged. Proper education and improvements in health-care facilities will reduce the incidence of discharges against medical advice. This may improve our trauma management. Injury prevention measures should include proper training of drivers and regular maintenance of roads with adequate and appropriate road signs, as most accidents were head-on collisions.

Acknowledgements

We thank all hospital staff who assisted in this study.

Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Chini F, Farchi S, Ciaramella I, Antoniozzi T, Giogo Rossi P, et al (2009) Road traffic injuries in one local health unit in the Lazio region: results of a surveillance system integrating police and health data. International Journal of Health Geographics 8:21. http://www.ij-healthgeographics.com/content/8/1/21 (accessed 10/4/10) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Fitzharris M, Dandona R, Kumar G, Dandona L. Crash characteristics and patterns of injury among hospitalized motorised two-wheeled vehicle users in urban India. BMC public health 9:11. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/11 (accessed 11/4/10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Hofman K, Primack A, Keusch G, Hrynkow S. Addressing the Growing Burden of Trauma and Injury in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Am J Publ Health. 2005;95(1):13–17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.039354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kaplan L, Roesler D (2008) Critical Care Considerations in Trauma. Emedicine specialties > Trauma > Trauma management. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/434445-overview. (accessed 4/2/2010)
  • 5.Moghadam PF, Dallago G, Piffer S, Zanon G, Menegon S, et al. Epidemiology of traffic accidents in the province of Trento: first results of an integrated surveillance system (MITRIS) Epidemiol Prev. 2005;29(3–4):172–179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nantulya VM, Reich MR. The neglected epidemic: road traffic injuries in developing countries. BMJ. 2002;324:1139–1141. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7346.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Patil SS, Kakade RV, Durgawale PM, Kakade SV. Pattern of road traffic injuries: A study from western Maharashtra. Indian J Community Med. 2008;33:56–7. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.39248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Peden M, McGee K, Sharma G (2002) The Injury Chart Book: A Graphical Overview of the Global Burden of Injuries. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/924156220X.pdf. (accessed 4/2/2010)
  • 9.Racioppi F, Eriksson L, Tingvall C, Villaveces A. Preventing road traffic injury: A public health perspective for Europe. The World Health organization Europe. www.euro.who.int/document/E82659.pdf. (accessed on 10/4/10)
  • 10.Razzaka J, Luby S. Estimating deaths and injuries due to road traffic accidents in Karachi, Pakistan, through the capture-recapture method. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;25(5):866–870. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.5.866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Segui-Gomez M, MacKenzie E. Measuring the Public Health Impact of Injuries. Epidemiol Rev. 2003;25(1):3–19. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxg007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thanni L, Kehinde O. Trauma at a Nigerian teaching hospital: pattern and documentation of presentation. Afr Health Sci. 2006;6(2):104–107. doi: 10.5555/afhs.2006.6.2.104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.What Causes Car Accidents? SmartMotorist.com. http://www.smartmotorist.com/traffic-and-safety-guideline/what-causes-car-accidents.html. (accessed 10/4/10)

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES