Abstract
Background
Associations of serum calcium levels with the metabolic syndrome and other novel cardio-metabolic risk factors not classically included in the metabolic syndrome, such as those involved in oxidative stress, are largely unexplored. We analyzed the association of albumin-corrected serum calcium levels with conventional and non-conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors in a general adult population.
Methodology/Principal Findings
The CoLaus study is a population-based study including Caucasians from Lausanne, Switzerland. The metabolic syndrome was defined using the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Non-conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors considered included: fat mass, leptin, LDL particle size, apolipoprotein B, fasting insulin, adiponectin, ultrasensitive CRP, serum uric acid, homocysteine, and gamma-glutamyltransferase. We used adjusted standardized multivariable regression to compare the association of each cardio-metabolic risk factor with albumin-corrected serum calcium. We assessed associations of albumin-corrected serum calcium with the cumulative number of non-conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors.
We analyzed 4,231 subjects aged 35 to 75 years. Corrected serum calcium increased with both the number of the metabolic syndrome components and the number of non-conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors, independently of the metabolic syndrome and BMI. Among conventional and non-conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors, the strongest positive associations were found for factors related to oxidative stress (uric acid, homocysteine and gamma-glutamyltransferase). Adiponectin had the strongest negative association with corrected serum calcium.
Conclusions/Significance
Serum calcium was associated with the metabolic syndrome and with non-conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors independently of the metabolic syndrome. Associations with uric acid, homocysteine and gamma-glutamyltransferase were the strongest. These novel findings suggest that serum calcium levels may be associated with cardiovascular risk via oxidative stress.
Introduction
Increased serum calcium concentration has been associated with high blood pressure (BP)[1], impaired glucose tolerance [2], and dyslipidemia [3], [4]. More recently, increased serum calcium concentration has been described as a feature of the metabolic syndrome (MSy) [5].
Cardio-metabolic components not classically included in the MSy have been associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease and include components related to adiposity[6], blood lipids [7], and insulin resistance [8]. In addition, factors related to inflammation and oxidative stress have been recently associated with the MSy. For example, observations suggest that serum levels of uric acid, homocysteine or gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) might be linked to the MSy [9]–[11].
While associations of serum calcium with the conventional components of the MSy on one hand [5], and of non-conventional cardio-metabolic (NCCM) risk factors with the MSy on the other hand have been explored [12]–[18], the relationship between serum calcium and NCCM risk factors has not been characterized in the general population. We analyzed the association of albumin-corrected serum calcium (Cac) with conventional and a broad range of NCCM risk factors in the Swiss population-based CoLaus study.
Methods
Objectives
The objectives were to analyze the association of albumin-corrected serum calcium (Cac) with conventional and non-conventional cardio-metabolic (NCCM) risk factors in a general adult population.
Participants
The sampling procedure of the CoLaus study has been described elsewhere [19]. Briefly, a simple, non-stratified random sample of 35% of the overall population was drawn. The following inclusion criteria applied: a) written informed consent; b) aged 35–75 years; c) willingness to take part in the examination and donate blood sample; d) Caucasian origin.
Assessment process and clinical data
Recruitment began in June 2003 and ended in May 2006. All participants attended the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital of Lausanne in the morning after an overnight fast. Data were collected by trained field interviewers using standardized questionnaires. Body mass index (BMI) was defined as weight/height2. Waist and hip circumferences were measured as recommended [20]. Fat and fat-free masses were assessed by electrical bioimpedance [21] using the Bodystat® 1500 analyzer (Isle of Man, British Isles). BP was measured thrice on the left arm after at least 10 minutes rest in the seated position using a clinically validated automated oscillometric device (Omron® HEM-907, Matsusaka, Japan) with a standard cuff, or a large cuff if arm circumference was ≥33 cm. The average of the last two BP readings was used for analyses. Hypertension was defined as mean systolic BP (SBP)≥140 mmHg or mean diastolic BP (DBP)≥90 mmHg or presence of anti-hypertensive medication. For the purpose of the present analysis, smoking was defined as present if a participant reported to be a current smoker at the time of examination, regular alcohol consumption was defined as present for participants reporting to drink alcohol at least once a day, and post-menopausal status was self-reported. Diabetes was defined as a fasting glucose≥7 mmol/L and/or presence of antidiabetic drug treatment (insulin or oral drugs).
Biologic data
The complete description of markers and types of assay used for the purpose of this analysis is reported in Table S1. Total serum calcium was measured by O-cresolphtalein and albumin by bromocresol green. Cac was calculated using the following formula: Cac = Serum total calcium-0.012 (serum albumin/0.9677−39.55). This formula was derived by the central laboratory of the University Hospital of Lausanne (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV) based on data from 320 consecutive outpatients without disorders of phosphocalcic metabolism. In CoLaus, Cac using this formula presented no residual correlation with serum albumin. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the abbreviated Modification of the Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula: 186×(serum creatinine [µmol/L]/88.4)(−1.154)×age(−0.203)×F, where F = 1 for men and F = 0.742 for women [22].
Conventional and non-conventional cardio-metabolic components
The MSy was defined using the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria [23] as presenting with 3 or more of the following criteria: (1) waist circumference≥102 cm in men and ≥88 cm in women; (2) SBP≥130 mmHg or DBP≥85 mmHg or medication use; (3) triglycerides≥1.69 mmol/L (150 mg/dL); (4) HDL cholesterol<1.04 mmol/L (40 mg/dL) in men and<1.30 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) in women, or medication use; (5) fasting plasma glucose≥6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) or medication use. We did not consider drug treatment for elevated triglycerides in the definition of elevated triglycerides. Components of the MSy were defined as conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors. Cardio-metabolic components that are not included in the MSy were defined as non-conventional cardio-metabolic (NCCM) risk factors and classified into the following four groups: (i)Adiposity: fat mass (kg), leptin (ng/mL); (ii)Blood lipids: LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L), LDL size (angström), apolipoprotein B (mg/dL); (iii)Insulin resistance: fasting insulin (µU/mL), adiponectin (µg/mL); (iv)Inflammation-oxidative stress: ultrasensitive CRP (mg/L), serum uric acid (µmol/L), homocysteine (µmol/L), GGT (UI/L).
Ethics
The CoLaus study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Institutional Ethic Committee (Baudraz Marcel-André, Boillat Marcel-André, Gardaz Jean-Patrice, Joye Charles, Lejeune Ferdy, Pannatier André, Reymond Catherine, Rossel Martine, Burnand Bernard). All participants gave written informed consent.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 10.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, USA). Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (s.d.) or as median and interquartile range [IQR]. Categorical variables were expressed as number of subjects and percentage.
Linear and median regressions were used to assess the association of serum Cac with conventional and NCCM risk factors. Non-normally distributed variables were transformed (log or cubic transformation). Associations were considered with serum Cac taken as quintiles (quintiles analysis) and as a continuous variable (standardized and score analyses).
In quintiles analysis, interaction with gender and trends by quintiles were assessed using median regression, adjusting for age, smoking, alcohol consumption, menopausal status, eGFR, and thiazide use. Robust regression was used whenever models were unstable. Adjusted standardized multivariable linear regression was used to compare the association with Cac of each of the cardio-metabolic risk factors. S.d. equals 1 for all standardized beta coefficients. Associations of serum Cac with the number of cardio-metabolic risk factors were then assessed. Each conventional cardio-metabolic risk factor was included in a score using the ATPIII classification (MSy score; ranged from 0 to 5). For the NCCM score, subjects in the upper tertile of the risk factor were assigned a value of 1, whereas subjects in the first and second tertiles were assigned a value of 0 for each NCCM risk factor positively correlated with cardiovascular disease, and vice versa for NCCM risk factor negatively correlated with cardiovascular disease. Positive and negative correlations were based on the existing literature. Only NCCM risk factors that showed a statistically significantly trend with Cac in quintiles analyses were entered into the NCCM score. The linearity of association between serum Cac and MSy score, or between serum Cac and NCCM score, were tested using median regression. When linearity failed to be rejected, linear trends by score were tested. NCCM score analysis was further adjusted for conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors. The association analyses between Cac and the two scores were performed with and without adjustment for BMI. We only included in the analysis subjects for whom all variables of interest for the purpose of this study were available. We conducted sensitivity analyses using an alternative formula to correct serum calcium for albumin as proposed by Ahlström et al, i.e. calcium+0.019* (42-albumin) [5]. We also performed sensitivity analyses by including all CoLaus participants in the analyses, which increases the sample size.
Results
All variables of interest were not available in 1’957 participants, thus a total of 4,231 subjects were included in the analysis. This represents 68.4% (4,231/6,188) of the entire CoLaus sample. Subjects included in the analysis differed from excluded participants in several aspects (Table S2).
Clinical characteristics by gender are detailed in Table 1 . Men had a higher mean BMI than women, and a higher prevalence of cigarette smoking, and of regular alcohol consumption, than women. Men were also more likely to have hypertension and diabetes than women. Mean serum calcium was similar between genders whereas Cac was slightly lower in men than in women (2.21±0.08 vs. 2.22±0.09 mmol/L).
Table 1. Characteristics of the 4,231 individuals from the CoLaus study.
Men (N = 1,976) | Women (N = 2,255) | ||||
Mean or % | SD | Mean or % | SD | P value | |
Age (years) | 53.5 | 10.9 | 53.8 | 10.8 | 0.466 |
Body mass index (kg/m2) | 27.1 | 3.8 | 25.2 | 4.4 | <0.001 |
Cigarette smoking (%) | 27.2 | - | 23.8 | - | 0.010 |
Regular alcohol consumption (%) | 35.6 | - | 15.6 | - | <0.001 |
Post-menopause (%) | - | - | 57.0 | - | |
Fasting blood glucose≥7 mmol/L (%) | 10.2 | - | 3.46 | - | <0.001 |
Fasting blood glucose≥6.1 mmol/L* (%) | 20.7 | 7.8 | <0.001 | ||
SBP≥140 and or DBP≥90 mmHg (%) | 45.6 | - | 31.4 | - | <0.001 |
SBP≥130 and or DBP≥80 mmHg (%)* | 62.5 | - | 45.7 | - | <0.001 |
Waist circumference≥102 cm in men or≥88 cm in women* (%) | 27.5 | 31.6 | 0.004 | ||
HDL-cholesterol<1.04 in men or<1.30 mmol/L in women* (%) | 11.3 | 13.5 | 0.028 | ||
Triglycerides≥1.69 mmol/L* (%) | 35.2 | 16.0 | <0.001 | ||
ATPIII Metabolic syndrome (%) | 22.8 | - | 13.7 | <0.001 | |
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 86.0 | 16.9 | 80.6 | 15.3 | <0.001 |
Serum calcium (mmol/L) | 2.29 | 0.09 | 2.29 | 0.10 | 0.162 |
Serum albumin (g/L) | 44.6 | 2.5 | 43.8 | 2.4 | <0.001 |
Albumin-corrected calcium (mmol/L) | 2.21 | 0.08 | 2.22 | 0.09 | 0.017 |
*criteria used for the ATPIII Metabolic syndrome definition. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL-cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol; eGFR, GFR estimated using the MDRD formula.
The distributions of conventional and NCCM risk factors are presented in Table 2 . With the exception of HDL-cholesterol, the means/medians of all conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors were higher in men than in women. The MSy was present in 451 men (23%) and 310 women (14%).
Table 2. Values of conventional and nonconventional parameters involved in the metabolic syndrome in the 4,231 individuals from the CoLaus study.
Men (N = 1,976) | Women (N = 2,255) | ||||
Mean or % | SD | Mean or % | SD | P value | |
Conventional risk factors | |||||
SBP (mmHg) | 133 | 17 | 125 | 18 | <0.001 |
DBP (mmHg) | 81.8 | 10.5 | 77.8 | 10.6 | <0.001 |
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.41 | 0.34 | 1.79 | 0.42 | <0.001 |
Triglycerides (mmol/L)* | 1.3 | 0.9–2.0 | 1.0 | 0.8–1.4 | <0.001 |
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.83 | 1.20 | 5.34 | 0.89 | <0.001 |
Waist circumference (cm) | 97.4 | 10.5 | 83.7 | 11.6 | <0.001 |
Adiposity | |||||
Fat mass (kg) | 20.7 | 7.3 | 23.4 | 8.5 | <0.001 |
Leptin (ng/mL)* | 6.42 | 4.0–11.1 | 14.8 | 8.8–24.0 | <0.001 |
Blood lipids | |||||
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.46 | 0.91 | 3.30 | 0.93 | <0.001 |
LDL size (angstrom)* | 272 | 268–274 | 274 | 271–275 | <0.001 |
Apolipoprotein B (mg/dL)* | 152 | 109–222 | 135 | 97–199 | <0.001 |
Insulin resistance | |||||
Fasting insulin (µU/mL)* | 8.00 | 5.8–12.0 | 6.29 | 4.6–9.5 | <0.001 |
Adiponectin (µg/mL)* | 6149 | 4041–9124 | 10289 | 6696–15184 | <0.001 |
Inflammation | |||||
CRP (mg/L)* | 1.3 | 0.7–2.6 | 1.4 | 0.7–3.0 | 0.427 |
Oxidative stress | |||||
Serum uric acid (µmol/L) | 10.4 | 8.8–12.7 | 8.8 | 7.3–10.7 | <0.001 |
Homocysteine (µmol/L)* | 29.5 | 21.0–46.5 | 16.0 | 12.0–24.0 | <0.001 |
GGT (UI/L)* | 365 | 76 | 271 | 67 | <0.001 |
See footnote of Table 1. LDL-cholesterol, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase. * Data are median, interquartile range, and 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test; uCRP = ultrasensitive C reactive protein.
As to NCCM risk factors, women had higher median fat mass and leptin levels than men. LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B were higher in men than in women, whereas LDL median size was lower in men. Compared to women, levels of serum uric acid, homocysteine and GGT were higher in men.
Table 3 shows adjusted associations of conventional and NCCM risk factors with Cac quintiles. Among the conventional risk factors, SBP, DBP, triglycerides and fasting blood glucose were all significantly higher across increasing quintiles of Cac.
Table 3. Adjusted conventional and non-conventional metabolic components, by sex-specific albumin-corrected calcium quintiles. (Men+Women, N = 4,231).* .
Q1[2.11 mmol/L](N = 903) | Q2[2.17 mmol/L](N = 800) | Q3[2.22 mmol/L](N = 946) | Q4[2.26 mmol/L](N = 766) | Q5[2.33 mmol/L](N = 816) | P value for trend | |
CONVENTIONAL | ||||||
SBP (mm Hg) | 125 | 127 | 128 | 129 | 130 | 0.000 |
[124–126] | [126–127] | [127–128] | [128–130] | [129–131] | ||
DBP (mm Hg) | 77.5 | 78.5 | 79.0 | 79.8 | 80.2 | 0.000 |
[76.9–78.1] | [78.1–78.9] | [78.8–79.4] | [79.4–80.2] | [79.7–80.9] | ||
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L)** | 1.60 | 1.57 | 1.59 | 1.58 | 1.60 | 0.32 |
[1.58–1.62] | [1.56–1.58] | [1.57–1.59] | [1.56–1.59] | [1.58–1.62] | ||
Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.08 | 1.15 | 1.17 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 0.000 |
[1.05–1.12] | [1.12–1.17] | [1.15–1.19] | [1.19–1.24] | [1.20–1.27] | ||
Fasting blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.36 | 5.40 | 5.41 | 5.44 | 5.44 | 0.01 |
[5.32–5.39] | [5.38–5.43] | [5.39–5.43] | [5.41–5.46] | [5.40–5.48] | ||
Waist circumference (cm) | 87.6 | 89.1 | 89.1 | 89.7 | 89.3 | 0.07 |
[86.8–88.3] | [88.6–89.7] | [89.7–89.5] | [89.1–90.2] | [88.5–90.1] | ||
NON CONVENTIONAL | ||||||
ADIPOSITY | ||||||
Fat mass (kg) | 20.5 | 20.6 | 20.9 | 21.2 | 21.5 | 0.001 |
[20.1–20.9] | [20.3–20.9] | [20.7–21.2] | [20.9–21.5] | [21.1–21.9] | ||
Leptin (ng/mL) | 11.6 | 10.9 | 11.0 | 10.8 | 11.0 | 0.41 |
[11.2–12.0] | [10.7–11.3] | [10.8–11.3] | [10.5–11.1] | [10.6–11.5] | ||
LIPID | ||||||
LDL-cholesterol(mmol/L) | 3.12 | 3.25 | 3.33 | 3.43 | 3.50 | <0.001 |
[3.08–3.16] | [3.22–3.28] | [3.30–3.35] | [3.40–3.46] | [3.45–3.55] | ||
LDL size (angström) | 273.0 | 272.7 | 272.6 | 272.5 | 272.4 | 0.001 |
[272.8–273.2] | [272.6–272.9] | [272.5–272.8] | [272.3–272.6] | [272.2–272.6] | ||
Apolipoprotein B (mg/dL) | 141 | 143 | 143 | 145 | 144 | 0.58 |
[136–146] | [140–147] | [141–146] | [141–148] | [139–149] | ||
INSULIN | ||||||
Fasting insulin (μU/mL) | 6.62 | 7.03 | 7.27 | 7.58 | 7.78 | <0.001 |
[6.39–6.84] | [6.87–7.19] | [7.14–7.40] | [7.42–7.74] | [7.54–8.01] | ||
Adiponectin (µg/mL) | 9064 | 8544 | 8370 | 8058 | 7957 | <0.001 |
[8739–9389] | [8315–8774] | [8184–8557] | [7823–8293] | [7619–8296] | ||
INFLAMMATION | ||||||
uCRP (mg/L) | 1.37 | 1.38 | 1.40 | 1.41 | 1.42 | 0.51 |
[1.27–1.47] | [1.31–1.45] | [1.34–1.45] | [1.34–1.48] | [1.32–1.53] | ||
OXIDATIVE STRESS | ||||||
Serum uric acid (µmol/L) | 292 | 307 | 311 | 320 | 322 | <0.001 |
[289–296] | [305–310] | [309–313] | [317–322] | [318–325] | ||
Homocysteine (µmol/L) | 9.12 | 9.53 | 9.74 | 10.03 | 10.19 | <0.001 |
[8.99–9.25] | [9.44–9.62] | [9.66–9.81] | [9.93–10.12] | [10.05–10.33] | ||
GGT (UI/L) | 20.45 | 22.42 | 23.23 | 24.50 | 25.07 | <0.001 |
[19.89–21.01] | [22.03–22.81] | [22.91–23.55] | [24.10–24.91] | [24.49–25.65] |
SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; uCRP = ultrasensitive C reactive protein.
*Results are medians [95% confidence intervals] adjusted for age, smoking, alcohol consumption, menopause status, eGFR, and thiazide use.
**Robust regression was used to model HDL-cholesterol.
Among NCCM risk factors, fat mass increased with increasing quintiles of Cac (p value = 0.001); LDL-cholesterol increased (p value<0.001) whereas LDL size decreased as Cac quintiles rose (p value = 0.001). Factors related to insulin resistance were significantly associated with quintiles of Cac: fasting insulin was positively and adiponectin negatively associated with Cac quintiles. Ultrasensitive CRP levels rose with Cac quintiles, thought not significantly. Among NCCM risk factors related to oxidative stress, all were increasing with increasing quintiles of Cac (all with p<0.01). Gender interaction was only statistically significant for GGT (p<0.001) (sex-specific associations between cardio-metabolic risk factors and Cac quintiles are provided in Tables S3 and S4). Sensitivity analyses including all CoLaus participants led to similar results, except for a significant association of CRP with calcium quintiles in men. As CRP was not significantly associated with calcium quintiles in participants who actually contribute to the final statistical models, we did not include CRP in the score.
The eight NCCM associated with Cac in the adjusted quintiles analyses (1) fat mass, (2) LDL-cholesterol, (3) LDL size, (4) insulin, (5) adiponectin, (6) uric acid, (7) homocysteine, and (8) GGT) were included in further analyses. The largest pairwise Spearman rank correlations were between SBP and DBP (0.79), and between fat mass and waist circumference (0.57).
Figure 1 illustrates adjusted standardized associations between cardio-metabolic risk factors and Cac taken as the continuous dependent variable. All conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors were positively associated with Cac. Triglycerides was the conventional cardio-metabolic risk factor most strongly associated with Cac (β = +0.076). NCCM risk factors related to oxidative stress were the factors most strongly and positively associated with Cac. Adjusted for age, sex, smoking, alcohol, menopausal status, eGFR, and thiazide use, standardized beta coefficients for acid uric, logGGT and logHomocysteine were +0.083, +0.089, and +0.078, respectively. Adiponectin had the most important negative association with Cac (β = −0.072). Except for fat mass, further adjustment for conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors did not meaningfully change the magnitude of the association between NCCM risk factors and Cac. The standardized beta coefficient of fat mass increased from −0.002 to 0.071 after further adjustment for conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors. Further analyses showed that fat mass was mostly influenced by the introduction of waist circumference in the model. Standardized beta coefficients are presented by gender in Table S5.
Respectively 1286 (30.4%), 1278 (30.2%), 924 (21.8%), 526 (12.4%), 187 (4.4%) and 48 (1.1%) subjects had 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors (MSy score). Figure 2 illustrates the association between MSy score and Cac. Cac increased with the number of conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors (p for linear trend<0.001). Further adjustment for BMI did not change the magnitude or the significance of the association. Linear trends were significant for men and women considered separately (Table S6). Sensitivity analyses using the alternate formula (calcium + 0.019 * [42−albumin]) [5] showed higher corrected calcium levels for each category of MSy or NCCM components, but similar trends and levels of statistical significance were observed, which leads the same conclusions (data available upon request).
Because only 16 (0.37%) subjects presented all 8 NCCM risk factors, categories 7 and 8 were pooled. Thus, respectively 465 (11.0%), 783 (18.5%), 837 (19.8%), 750 (17.7%), 592 (14.0%), 443 (10.5%), 249 (5.9%), and 112 (2.6%) had 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7+ NCCM risk factors (NCCM score). The mean number of NCCM per subjects was 2.7 (SD = 1.83). Figure 3 illustrates the association between NCCM score and Cac. Cac increased with the number of NCCM risk factors (p for linear trend<0.001). Further adjustment for BMI did not change the magnitude and significance of the association. Linear trends were significant for men and women and considered separately (Table S7).
Discussion
We found serum calcium to be strongly associated with conventional MSy components, in particular fasting serum glucose and serum triglycerides. Serum calcium showed a positive trend with the number of MSy components, independently of BMI. Cac increased from 0 to 3 components, followed by a plateau and a final rise. The association of serum calcium with the number of MSy components was recently reported in a population-based study of 1000 elderly subjects [5]. Our study confirmed this association in a larger population of subjects aged 35–75 years. Our findings suggest that serum calcium might be considered as an additional component of the MSy.
In addition, serum calcium was associated with a vast array of NCCM risk factors, including proxies for insulin resistance and markers of oxidative stress, independently of the conventional MSy risk factors. Although the associations with BP [1], insulin resistance [24] and dyslipidemia [3] have been previously described, we are not aware that this was reported for serum uric acid, homocysteine, or GGT levels in a large-scale population-based sample. The associations of calcium levels and uric acid have been reported in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism [25], [26].
We reported that fasting insulin was significantly associated with serum calcium, independently of conventional cardio-metabolic risk factors. Our results were consistent with those of large-scale studies that found elevated serum calcium levels to be associated with insulin resistance, measured using fasting insulin or homeostatic model assessment [2], [27], [28]. By contrast, serum calcium has not been shown to be associated with insulin secretion [24], [27]. In our study, the negative association of serum adiponectin with serum calcium is concordant with the hypothesis that serum calcium is a marker of insulin resistance because adiponectin levels are decreased in patients with type 2 diabetes [29] and in insulin resistance states [30].
Homocysteine, a sulfur-containing amino acid resulting from the metabolism of methionine and a marker of animal protein consumption, has been previously associated with the MSy in some studies [10], but not with the components of the MSy in healthy men [31]. Homocysteine is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, most probably through its role on atherogenesis and oxidative stress [32]. No relationship between homocysteine and Cac has been described so far, although several studies pointed out the role of homocysteine and oxidative stress on bone and thus, the indirect role of homocysteine on calcium metabolism [33], [34].
In humans, uric acid represents the final catabolic pathway for purines. Uricase activity has been lost over evolution in higher primates; consequently, humans have high uric acid plasma levels. This might confer an evolutionary advantage, maybe through its effect on oxidation. However, the role of uric acid has on oxidative metabolism is ambiguous. On one hand, it is a powerful anti-oxidant, representing about half of the anti-oxidant scavenging capacities of the plasma. On the other hand, its intracellular metabolism generates superoxide anions and other reactive oxygen species [35]. A positive association of uric acid and Cac levels has not been reported before, even though each of them have been associated with the MSy.[9] A small study has shown a negative association between calcemia, uric acid levels and xanthine oxidase activity in 2 healthy volonteers [36]. The association between Cac and uric acid levels lifts up new hypothesis about links between the metabolisms of uric acid and calcium. Both electrolytes are mainly reabsorbed in the proximal tubule of the kidney. They are dependent on sodium reabsorption, and on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. The calcium ATP-ase (PMCA) [37] and the sodium/calcium exchanger (NCX1) [38] have been shown to be regulated by reactive oxygen species and are also involved in calcium reabsorption by the kidney [39]. Overall, the association of Cac with the NCCM risk factor uric acid raises new hypothesis which should be explored through new further studies.
GGT is an enzyme found mainly in the liver. It is involved in glutathione metabolism, amino acid transfers, and leukotriene metabolism [40]. An association between a progressive increase of GGT activity and the number of the MSy components has recently been reported [11].
GGT is also a marker of oxidative stress, even within its normal range [41]–[45]. Apart from the typical serum GGT elevation due to oxidative stress in the liver after alcohol consumption, GGT could be an early marker of oxidative stress related to atherosclerosis, diabetes and other cardiovascular disease.
In our study, uric acid, homocysteine and GGT were NCCM risk factors most strongly associated with serum Cac. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that associations of serum calcium with uric acid, homocysteine or GGT are studied and positive associations reported. Oxidative stress and calcium have been extensively studied in the context of calcium transport and signaling [46]. At the cellular level, oxidative stress causes calcium influx into the cytoplasm, mitochondria, and nuclei. The association between serum Cac and oxidative stress related factors needs to be further explored. Of note, HDL-cholesterol, a lipoprotein with anti-oxidant proprieties, was not significantly associated with Cac. In a previous population-based study [5], Cac was associated with HDL-cholesterol but only after excluding individuals with mild primary hyperparathyroidism . Because parathyroid hormone (PTH) was not available in our study we cannot exclude a similar association.
We reported higher CRP levels in the upper Cac quintiles, thought not significant. Higher CRP levels were associated with higher calcium levels in chronic hemodialysis patients [47]. General population-based studies on the association of calcium levels and CRP are lacking. The strong associations of Cac and uric acid, homocysteine and GGT, and the lack of association with CRP suggest that Cac is particularly related to oxidative stress rather than to inflammation.
One should differentiate the issue of calcium intake and the one of tightly regulated serum calcium levels. We found serum calcium to be associated with a wide-range of metabolic disturbances. Our findings provide no information on whether or not dietary calcium intake plays a role in these metabolic disturbances.
Limitations
Our study has limitations. First, neither vitamin D nor PTH or other new regulator of mineral metabolism (e.g., FGF-23, Klotho) are available in our sample and we cannot explore whether the association of serum calcium with these metabolic disturbances is the result of, or mediated by, vitamin D or PTH action. Second, we assigned the same weight to each cardio-metabolic risk factor to derive the NCCM score. While we could have used unequal weights, an equal weight approach has been privileged to be concordant with the ATP III MSy criteria. Third, participants included in the analysis differed by important characteristics from the entire cohort, and thus our conclusions may not be representative of the general Lausanne population. Finally, the results from a cross-sectional study do not allow inferring causality.
While considering these limitations, our results confirmed previous associations between serum calcium and MSy and suggested that calcium metabolism could be considered as an additional feature of the MSy. In addition, calcium metabolism was associated with NCCM risk factors, including markers of insulin resistance, independently of the conventional components of the MSy and of BMI. The novel associations with oxidative stress markers were the strongest and deserve further explorations.
Supporting Information
Footnotes
Competing Interests: VM is a full-time employee of GSK and the CoLaus study was sponsored in part by GlaxoSmithKline. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. MB is an Academic Editor for PLoS ONE. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLoS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Funding: The CoLaus study was sponsored in part by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and currently by the Swiss National Science Foundation (33CSCO-122661). IG is supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation grant (SNF 33CM30-124087/1). These funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. VM is a full-time employee of GSK and played a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish and preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Jorde R, Sundsfjord J, Fitzgerald P, Bonaa KH. Serum calcium and cardiovascular risk factors and diseases: the Tromso study. Hypertension. 1999;34:484–490. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.34.3.484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wareham NJ, Byrne CD, Carr C, Day NE, Boucher BJ, et al. Glucose intolerance is associated with altered calcium homeostasis: a possible link between increased serum calcium concentration and cardiovascular disease mortality. Metabolism. 1997;46:1171–1177. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(97)90212-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lind L, Jakobsson S, Lithell H, Wengle B, Ljunghall S. Relation of serum calcium concentration to metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease. BMJ. 1988;297:960–963. doi: 10.1136/bmj.297.6654.960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.De Bacquer D, De Henauw S, De Backer G, Kornitzer M. Epidemiological evidence for an association between serum calcium and serum lipids. Atherosclerosis. 1994;108:193–200. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(94)90114-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ahlstrom T, Hagstrom E, Larsson A, Rudberg C, Lind L, et al. Correlation between plasma calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) in a community-based cohort of men and women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;71:673–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03558.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Leyva F, Godsland IF, Ghatei M, Proudler AJ, Aldis S, et al. Hyperleptinemia as a component of a metabolic syndrome of cardiovascular risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:928–933. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.18.6.928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barter PJ, Ballantyne CM, Carmena R, Castro Cabezas M, Chapman MJ, et al. Apo B versus cholesterol in estimating cardiovascular risk and in guiding therapy: report of the thirty-person/ten-country panel. J Intern Med. 2006;259:247–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kadowaki T, Yamauchi T, Kubota N, Hara K, Ueki K, et al. Adiponectin and adiponectin receptors in insulin resistance, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1784–1792. doi: 10.1172/JCI29126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lippi G, Montagnana M, Franchini M, Favaloro EJ, Targher G. The paradoxical relationship between serum uric acid and cardiovascular disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;392:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guven A, Inanc F, Kilinc M, Ekerbicer H. Plasma homocysteine and lipoprotein (a) levels in Turkish patients with metabolic syndrome. Heart Vessels. 2005;20:290–295. doi: 10.1007/s00380-004-0822-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Giral P, Ratziu V, Couvert P, Carrie A, Kontush A, et al. Plasma bilirubin and gamma-glutamyltransferase activity are inversely related in dyslipidemic patients with metabolic syndrome: relevance to oxidative stress. Atherosclerosis. 2010;210:607–613. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Okamoto Y. Adiponectin provides cardiovascular protection in metabolic syndrome. Cardiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:313179. doi: 10.4061/2011/313179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kajikawa Y, Ikeda M, Takemoto S, Tomoda J, Ohmaru N, et al. Association of circulating levels of leptin and adiponectin with metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease in patients with various coronary risk factors. Int Heart J. 2011;52:17–22. doi: 10.1536/ihj.52.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Onat A, Can G, Hergenc G, Yazici M, Karabulut A, et al. Serum apolipoprotein B predicts dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome and, in women, hypertension and diabetes, independent of markers of central obesity and inflammation. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:1119–1125. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Vonbank A, Saely CH, Rein P, Beer S, Breuss J, et al. Insulin Resistance is Associated with the Metabolic Syndrome and is Not Directly Linked to Coronary Artery Disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kawamoto R, Tabara Y, Kohara K, Miki T, Kusunoki T, et al. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels are synergistically associated with metabolic syndrome in community-dwelling persons. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2010;9:87. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-9-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim ES, Kwon HS, Ahn CW, Lim DJ, Shin JA, et al. Serum uric acid level is associated with metabolic syndrome and microalbuminuria in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications. 2010 doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2010.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bjorck J, Hellgren M, Rastam L, Lindblad U. Associations between serum insulin and homocysteine in a Swedish population-a potential link between the metabolic syndrome and hyperhomocysteinemia: the Skaraborg project. Metabolism. 2006;55:1007–1013. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Firmann M, Mayor V, Vidal PM, Bochud M, Pecoud A, et al. The CoLaus study: a population-based study to investigate the epidemiology and genetic determinants of cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2008;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-8-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lean ME, Han TS, Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. BMJ. 1995;311:158–161. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jebb SA, Siervo M, Murgatroyd PR, Evans S, Fruhbeck G, et al. Validity of the leg-to-leg bioimpedance to estimate changes in body fat during weight loss and regain in overweight women: a comparison with multi-compartment models. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:756–762. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, et al. National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:137–147. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-2-200307150-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Daniels SR, Donato KA, Eckel RH, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement. Circulation. 2005;112:2735–2752. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.169404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hagstrom E, Hellman P, Lundgren E, Lind L, Arnlov J. Serum calcium is independently associated with insulin sensitivity measured with euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp in a community-based cohort. Diabetologia. 2007;50:317–324. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0532-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Duh QY, Morris RC, Arnaud CD, Clark OH. Decrease in serum uric acid level following parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg. 1986;10:729–736. doi: 10.1007/BF01655570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ljunghall S, Akerstrom G. Urate metabolism in primary hyperparathyroidism. Urol Int. 1982;37:73–78. doi: 10.1159/000280800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lind L, Skarfors E, Berglund L, Lithell H, Ljunghall S. Serum calcium: a new, independent, prospective risk factor for myocardial infarction in middle-aged men followed for 18 years. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:967–973. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00104-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sun G, Vasdev S, Martin GR, Gadag V, Zhang H. Altered calcium homeostasis is correlated with abnormalities of fasting serum glucose, insulin resistance, and beta-cell function in the Newfoundland population. Diabetes. 2005;54:3336–3339. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.11.3336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hotta K, Funahashi T, Arita Y, Takahashi M, Matsuda M, et al. Plasma concentrations of a novel, adipose-specific protein, adiponectin, in type 2 diabetic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:1595–1599. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.6.1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Weyer C, Funahashi T, Tanaka S, Hotta K, Matsuzawa Y, et al. Hypoadiponectinemia in obesity and type 2 diabetes: close association with insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:1930–1935. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.5.7463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Godsland IF, Rosankiewicz JR, Proudler AJ, Johnston DG. Plasma total homocysteine concentrations are unrelated to insulin sensitivity and components of the metabolic syndrome in healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:719–723. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.2.7213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang D, Jiang X, Fang P, Yan Y, Song J, et al. Hyperhomocysteinemia promotes inflammatory monocyte generation and accelerates atherosclerosis in transgenic cystathionine beta-synthase-deficient mice. Circulation. 2009;120:1893–1902. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.866889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yilmaz N, Eren E. Homocysteine oxidative stress and relation to bone mineral density in post-menopausal osteoporosis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009;21:353–357. doi: 10.1007/BF03324927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Altindag O, Erel O, Soran N, Celik H, Selek S. Total oxidative/anti-oxidative status and relation to bone mineral density in osteoporosis. Rheumatol Int. 2008;28:317–321. doi: 10.1007/s00296-007-0452-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dawson J, Quinn T, Walters M. Uric acid reduction: a new paradigm in the management of cardiovascular risk? Curr Med Chem. 2007;14:1879–1886. doi: 10.2174/092986707781058797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Newaz MA, Adeeb NN, Muslim N, Razak TA, Htut NN. Uric acid, xanthine oxidase and other risk factors of hypertension in normotensive subjects. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1996;18:1035–1050. doi: 10.3109/10641969609081033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zaidi A, Michaelis ML. Effects of reactive oxygen species on brain synaptic plasma membrane Ca(2+)-ATPase. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27:810–821. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00128-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Huschenbett J, Zaidi A, Michaelis ML. Sensitivity of the synaptic membrane Na+/Ca2+ exchanger and the expressed NCX1 isoform to reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1374:34–46. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2736(98)00121-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hoenderop JG, Nilius B, Bindels RJ. Calcium absorption across epithelia. Physiol Rev. 2005;85:373–422. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00003.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Goldberg DM. Structural, functional, and clinical aspects of gamma-glutamyltransferase. CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1980;12:1–58. doi: 10.3109/10408368009108725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ruttmann E, Brant LJ, Concin H, Diem G, Rapp K, et al. Gamma-glutamyltransferase as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality: an epidemiological investigation in a cohort of 163,944 Austrian adults. Circulation. 2005;112:2130–2137. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.552547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Giral P, Jacob N, Dourmap C, Hansel B, Carrie A, et al. Elevated gamma-glutamyltransferase activity and perturbed thiol profile are associated with features of metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28:587–593. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.157891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Onat A, Hergenc G, Karabulut A, Turkmen S, Dogan Y, et al. Serum gamma glutamyltransferase as a marker of metabolic syndrome and coronary disease likelihood in nondiabetic middle-aged and elderly adults. Prev Med. 2006;43:136–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Andre P, Balkau B, Born C, Charles MA, Eschwege E. Three-year increase of gamma-glutamyltransferase level and development of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged men and women: the D.E.S.I.R. cohort. Diabetologia. 2006;49:2599–2603. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0418-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wannamethee G, Ebrahim S, Shaper AG. Gamma-glutamyltransferase: determinants and association with mortality from ischemic heart disease and all causes. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:699–708. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ermak G, Davies KJ. Calcium and oxidative stress: from cell signaling to cell death. Mol Immunol. 2002;38:713–721. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(01)00108-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee CT, Tsai YC, Ng HY, Su Y, Lee WC, et al. Association between C-reactive protein and biomarkers of bone and mineral metabolism in chronic hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study. J Ren Nutr. 2009;19:220–227. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2008.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.