Abstract
Laser-induced acoustic desorption (LIAD) combined with ClMn(H2O)+ chemical ionization (CI) was tested for the analysis of nonpolar lipids and selected steroids in a Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer (FT-ICR). The nonpolar lipids studied, cholesterol, 5α-cholestane, cholesta-3,5-diene, squalene, and β-carotene, were found to solely form the desired water replacement product (adduct-H2O) with the ClMn(H2O)+ ions. The steroids, androsterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), estrone, estradiol, and estriol, also form abundant adduct-H2O ions, but less abundant adduct-2H2O ions were also observed. Neither (+)APCI nor (+)ESI can ionize the saturated hydrocarbon lipid, cholestane. APCI successfully ionizes the unsaturated hydrocarbon lipids to form exclusively the intact protonated analytes. However, it causes extensive fragmentation for cholesterol and the steroids. The worst case is cholesterol that does not produce any stable protonated molecules. On the other hand, ESI cannot ionize any of the hydrocarbon analytes, saturated or unsaturated. However, ESI can be used to protonate the oxygen-containing analytes with substantially less fragmentation than for APCI in all cases except for cholesterol and estrone. In conclusion, LIAD/ClMn(H2O)+ chemical ionization is superior over APCI and ESI for the mass spectrometric characterization of underivatized nonpolar lipids and steroids.
Keywords: LIAD, Chemical ionization, Nonpolar lipids, Steroids, APCI, ESI, Aquachloromanganese ion, FT-ICR, Linear quadrupole ion trap
Introduction
Lipids play crucial roles in cell, tissue and organ physiology [1]. Many lipids are nonpolar. These lipids include triacylglyerols and cholesterol [2]. Some naturally occurring hydrocarbons, including squalene and hydrocarbon carotenoids, also belong to the nonpolar lipid category. Carotenoids have important physiological and biological functions, such as provitamin A activity and antioxidant ability [3]. Unfortunately, mass spectrometric analysis of naturally occurring nonpolar hydrocarbons remains challenging because of their structural similarity, their thermal lability, and the lack of easily ionizable functional groups [4].
Various mass spectrometric ionization and evaporation methods, including electron ionization (EI) [5–7], electrospray ionization (ESI) [8–10], atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) [11–14], and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) [15–17], have been employed in characterizing naturally occurring hydrocarbons and sterol lipids (including cholesterol and steroid hormones). However, each method has severe limitations. EI produces extensive fragmentation [18]. ESI and APCI are soft ionization/evaporation methods, but ESI is selective for polar compounds [19]. Although the sensitivity of APCI is low for polar and ionic compounds [20], APCI is often used for the analysis of squalene and carotenoids [4,14]. Derivatization is usually necessary to increase the volatility and/or ionization efficiency, or to allow chromatographic separation of steroid hormones [10,21,22]. However, derivatization is time-consuming, and can be a source of inaccuracy in quantitative analysis. MALDI suffers from interference of abundant matrix-derived ions in the low mass range.
Laser-induced acoustic desorption (LIAD) was recently demonstrated to be able to evaporate nonvolatile and thermally labile analytes as intact neutral molecules into a Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer [23,24]. Because the high-intensity laser pulses in these experiments do not have a direct contact with the analyte, the analyte molecules are not ionized. Instead, desorption of neutral analyte molecules with low kinetic and internal energies takes place [24,25]. The evaporated neutral molecules can be ionized by using EI [26], chemical ionization [23], or ESI [27].
Compared to other ionization methods, chemical ionization (CI) allows more control over the efficiency and selectivity of ionization and the degree of fragmentation via proper selection of the reagent ion. CI mass spectra of sterol hydrocarbons and steroid hormones have been obtained by using CH4, i-C4H10, and NH3 as the reagent gases [28]. The gases CH4 and i-C4H10 mainly produce M+H+ and dehydrated fragment ions (M+H+-nH2O). When using NH3 as the reagent gas, M+NH4+, M+H+ and dehydrated fragment ions (M+H+-nH2O) are commonly formed. Although some nonpolar lipids (such as 5α-cholestane) and polar lipids (steroid hormones) can be analyzed by using these methods [28], the issue of forming many ions from one analyte is a problem for mixture analysis.
Recently a novel chemical ionization reagent ion, ClMn(H2O)+, was demonstrated to ionize saturated hydrocarbons with no fragmentation of the analyte [19]. The reaction involves a simple replacement of the water molecule in the reagent ion with the hydrocarbon. The objective of this study was to test the utility of LIAD coupled with chemical ionization by using ClMn(H2O)+ reagent ions in an FT-ICR mass spectrometer for the analysis of nonpolar and polar lipids without pretreatment. The performance of this technique is compared to electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (both in positive ion mode) in a linear quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer.
Experimental
Most experiments were carried out in a Nicolet model FTMS 2000 dual-cell FT-ICR mass spectrometer equipped with LIAD [29,30]. The instrument contains a differentially pumped dual cell equipped with a 3-Tesla superconducting magnet. The dimensions of each cell are 1.875×1.875×1.875 in. The cells are separated by a conductance limit with a 2-mm hole in the center. This plate and the other trapping plates were maintained at +2 V unless otherwise stated. The nominal baseline pressure inside the cells was less than 10−9 Torr, as maintained with two Edwards Diffstak 160 diffusion pumps (700 L/s). Each diffusion pump was backed by an Alcatel rotary vane mechanical pump (3.2 L/s). The pressure in the vacuum chamber was measured by Bayard-Alpert ionization gauges located on each side of the dual cell. Samples may be introduced into either side of the instrument by various ways, including a heated solids probe, Varian leak valves, batch inlets equipped with leak valves, pulsed valves, and a LIAD probe.
Cholesterol and five steroids, androsterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, estriol, estrone, and estradiol, were dissolved in methanol (99.9% purity, HPLC grade) at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. 5α-Cholestane, cholesta-3,5-diene, squalene, and β-carotene were dissolved in a mixture of acetonitrile (99.9% purity, HPLC grade) and dichloromethane (99.9% purity) (1:1, v/v) at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL. 100 µL of each solution was deposited on thin Titanium foils (12.5 µm) by electrospray deposition [31]. The solvent was allowed to evaporate after sample deposition, and the foil was transferred to the sample support stage of the LIAD probe. The LIAD probe (outer diameter 7/8 in.) employed in this study was described previously [32]. The side of the foil coated with sample was exposed to the dual cell. Laser pulses generated by a Nd:YAG laser (Minilite II, Continuum Lasers; 532 nm; 3 ns pulse width) were delivered through an optical fiber and focused to an area of about 10−3 cm2 on the back side of the foil. The output energy of the laser pulse was 3.6 mJ/pulse, as measured by a pyroelectric meter (PE25-SH, OPHIR Laser Measurement), corresponding to a power density of about 8 × 108 W / cm2 at the foil surface. The outer cylinder of the LIAD probe was rotated so that analytes were desorbed from multiple spots. The probe was rotated at a speed of one degree per laser pulse (10 Hz). Typically, 10–20 laser pulses were used for each experiment.
A ligated water cluster of Mn+, ClMn(H2O)+, was generated by electron ionization of ClMn(CO)5 [19]. The ClMn(CO)5 precursor was synthesized from Mn(CO)10 according to a literature procedure [33]. The precursor was introduced into one side of the dual cell by using a solids probe (without heating the probe). Water vapor was introduced into the same side of the dual cell via a batch inlet. The reagent ion, ClMn(H2O)+, was generated by electron ionization (ionization energy 25 eV, emission current 7 µA, and beam duration 0.05 s) of the ClMn(CO)5 and H2O mixture. The reagent ion was then transferred into the other side of the dual cell by grounding the conductance limit for about 100 µs while the other trapping plates were maintained at +2 V. The transferred ions were cooled by collisions with argon gas which was pulsed into the cell (peak nominal pressure of 1×10−5 torr) via a pulsed valve assembly. The reagent ions were then isolated by ejecting unwanted ions via the use of a series of stored-waveform inverse Fourier transform (SWIFT) excitation pulses [34]. The isolated ClMn(H2O)+ ions were allowed to react with the lipid molecules desorbed into the same cell by LIAD using 10 – 15 laser shots. A broadband chirp excitation (1.9 kHz to 2.6 MHz, 200 V peak-to-peak, chirp rate 3200 Hz/µs) was used to excite all ions for detection. The spectra were obtained by collecting 64k data points at an acquisition rate of 5333 kHz. All mass spectra were subjected to Hanning apodization followed by one zero-fill prior to Fourier transformation.
A linear quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to examine the same analytes by using ESI and APCI. Analyte solutions were prepared in a mixture of water and methanol at a concentration of 0.01–0.1 mg/mL for ESI and 0.1–0.5 mg/mL for APCI. For ESI, the solution was directly injected into the ionization source at 3–5 µL/min by using an integrated syringe. The ESI conditions were as follows: spray voltage, 4.5–5 kV; sheath gas flow, 10 (arbitrary units); capillary temperature 275 °C. For APCI, the analyte solution was mixed with a solution of methanol and water (50/50, v/v) through a union. The analyte solution was injected by using the integrated syringe at a flow rate of 10 µL/min and the solution of methanol and water (50/50, v/v) was delivered by a HPLC pump at a flow rate of 190 µL/min. The entire mixture was delivered into the mass spectrometer. The APCI conditions were as follows: vaporizer temperature, 450 °C; sheath gas flow rate, 50 (arbitrary units); auxiliary gas flow rate, 5 (arbitrary units); capillary temperature, 275 °C; tube lens, 15 V.
Results and Discussion
Five nonpolar lipids and five steroids (Scheme 1) were analyzed by using LIAD/ClMn(H2O)+ in an FT-ICR. All analytes were successfully evaporated into the mass spectrometer by using LIAD. Cholesterol, 5α-cholestane, cholesta-3,5-diene, squalene, and β-carotene reacted with the CI reagent ion by replacement of the water molecule, as expected. For the steroids studied, the water replacement product ion was the main ionic reaction product although fragment ions were also observed. Details of these results, as well as their comparison to the results obtained for the same analytes by using (+)APCI and (+)ESI in a linear quadrupole ion trap, are given below.
Scheme 1.
Chemical structures of the nonpolar lipids and steroid hormones used in this study
LIAD/CI, APCI, and ESI of nonpolar lipids
LIAD/ClMn(H2O)+ was found to ionize the saturated hydrocarbon lipid, 5α-cholestane, via water replacement and without fragmentation (Table 1), as expected [19,35]. Similarly, ClMn(H2O)+ reacts with the unsaturated hydrocarbons cholesta-3,5-diene, squalene (Figure 1) and β-carotene, as well as cholesterol, by exclusively forming the water replacement product with no fragmentation (Table 1).
Table 1.
Ions (with their branching ratios) formed upon LIAD/CI, nonpolar lipids
| Lipids | LIAD/CI(+) | APCI(+) | ESI (+) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol | Adduct-H2O | 100% | M−H M+H-H2O |
2% 98% |
M+H-H2O | 100% |
| 5α-Cholestane | Adduct-H2O | 100% | No ions detected | No ions detected | ||
| Cholesta-3,5-diene | Adduct-H2O | 100% | M+H | 100% | No ions detected | |
| β-Carotene | Adduct-H2O | 100% | M+H | 100% | No ions detected | |
| Squalene | Adduct-H2O | 100% | M+H | 100% | No ions detected | |
| Androsterone | Adduct-H2O Adduct-2H2O |
79% 21% |
M+H M+H-H2O M+H-2H2O |
14% 60% 26% |
M+H M+H-H2O M+H-2H2O |
61% 32% 7% |
| Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | Adduct-H2O Adduct-2H2O |
90% 10% |
M+H M+H-H2O M+H-2H2O |
9% 62% 29% |
M+H M+H-H2O M+H-2H2O |
57% 37% 6% |
| Estrone | Adduct-H2O Adduct-2H2O |
64% 36% |
M+H M+H-H2O |
91% 9% |
M+H M+H-H2O |
81% 19% |
| Estradiol | Adduct-H2O Adduct-2H2O |
65% 35% |
M+H M− M+H-H2O |
13% 10% 77% |
M+H M−H M+H-H2O |
37% 7% 56% |
| Estriol | Adduct-H2O Adduct-2H2O Adduct-3H2O Adduct-3H2O-acetylene |
38% 19% 28% 15% |
M+H M−H M+H-H2O M+H-2H2O M+H-2H2O-acetylene |
4% 8% 56% 25% 7% |
M+Na M+H M−H M+H-H2O M+H-2H2O M+H-2H2O-acetylene |
14% 12% 8% 51% 6% 9% |
Figure 1.
LIAD/CI mass spectrum of squalene (MW 410).
In contrast, APCI did not yield any detectable ions for cholestane. However, this method produced stable protonated molecules for squalene, β-carotene, and cholesta-3,5-diene (but not for cholesterol), with no fragmentation. ESI proved to be useless for the characterization of these analytes. No ion signal was detected for any of the hydrocarbon analytes when subjected to ESI. For cholesterol, so extensive fragmentation took place that no protonated cholesterol was observed.
The differences between the results obtained by APCI and ESI are likely due to their quite different ionization mechanisms. Analytes are ionized by proton or metal cation transfer in highly charged droplets in ESI [38]. The low basicity of nonpolar lipids prevents this mode of ionization. In contrast, an APCI source initially forms nitrogen and solvent molecular ions upon corona discharge. These ions then produce protonated solvent molecules and water cluster ions [36,37] that are the species usually responsible for ionization of the analyte molecules by proton transfer. However, these ions are unreactive toward nonpolar lipids due to their low basicity. Instead, the initially produced nitrogen and solvent radical cations react with the lipids, producing lipid radical cations. These ions yield protonated lipid molecules in secondary reactions with neutral lipid molecules.
LIAD/CI, APCI, and ESI of sterol lipids
ClMn(H2O)+ reacts with androsterone predominantly by forming the water elimination product, as expected. Some fragment ions formed by elimination of another water molecule (branching ratio 21%) were also observed (Table 1). Possible mechanisms for the reaction sequence are presented in Scheme 1. First, the water ligand of ClMn(H2O)+ is replaced by androsterone, forming an ion of m/z 380, wherein MnCl+ is weakly bound to the carbonyl group (the most nucleophilic site in the molecule). Loss of the second water molecule may involve transfer of the MnCl+ ion around androsterone to enable it to interact with the hydroxyl group. These sorts of reactions have been reported previously for ion-molecule complexes of steroids in mass spectrometers [39]. Alternatively, it is possible that interaction of some ClMn(H2O)+ ions with the carbonyl group leads to elimination of one water molecule, while interaction of other ClMn(H2O)+ ions with the less nucleophilic hydroxyl group leads to the consecutive elimination of two water molecules.
Scheme 1.
A possible reaction pathway for androsterone
Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), estrone, estradiol, and estriol react with ClMn(H2O)+ similarly as androsterone (Table 1). The phenol hydroxyl group is not eliminated as water from estrone and estradiol, as expected due to the strong phenyl-oxygen bond. The small branching ratio for the second water elimination product (10%) for DHEA, and the complete lack of this product for cholesterol, suggests that after the first water elimination, the ClMn+ ion may be more strongly bound to the carbon-carbon double bond than to the carbonyl or hydroxyl group in these analytes. This prevents ClMn+ from reaching the hydroxyl group, which would eventually result in elimination of the second water molecule. This finding provides further support for the mechanism presented in Scheme 1. Two additional fragment ions, formed by elimination of a total of three water molecules from the adduct and a further elimination of acetylene, were observed for estriol. The mechanism of the acetylene elimination after elimination of three molecules of water from the adduct is under investigation.
With the exception of estrone, ESI and APCI produce much more extensive fragmentation for the polar lipids (Table 1) than LIAD/ClMn(H2O)+. For example, a fragment ion of m/z of 369, which corresponds to water loss after protonation of cholesterol, dominates the ESI and APCI spectra of cholesterol. No stable protonated cholesterol molecules were observed in either the ESI or APCI spectra (Table 1). Apparently, the proton transfer reactions occurring in the ESI and APCI sources are exothermic enough to cause water elimination for all protonated cholesterol molecules. In the LIAD/CI experiment, the water ligand in the reagent ion is weakly bond and readily replaced. Further fragmentation is minor because the water loss lowers the energy of the system [19].
Protonated molecules dominate the ESI mass spectra of androsterone, DHEA and estrone (Table 1). The difference in the behavior of these analytes and cholesterol is the nature of the most basic site, a carbonyl group (that is stable after protonation) as opposed to a hydroxyl group (whose protonation readily results in the loss of water). APCI produces substantially more fragmentation than ESI for all these analytes with the exception of estrone, which suggests that the proton transfer reactions in this ion source are more exothermic than in the ESI source [20]. Estrone was found to predominantly form a stable protonated molecule upon ESI and APCI. This may be explained by the lack of non-aromatic hydroxyl groups in estrone.
Conclusions
Laser-induced acoustic desorption coupled with chemical ionization by ClMn(H2O)+ allowed the evaporation and ionization of all the nonpolar and polar lipids studied. Adduct-H2O is the exclusive product for cholesterol and all the hydrocarbons, including the saturated hydrocarbon, cholestane. Also for steroids, adduct-H2O is the main product, but it is usually formed along with some adduct-2H2O due to the presence of hydroxyl or carbonyl groups in these analytes. This method is the only one studied that is capable of ionizing cholestane; no ions were observed for this analyte upon APCI or ESI.
APCI ionizes the unsaturated hydrocarbon lipids to form exclusively the intact protonated analytes. However, it causes extensive fragmentation for the oxygen-containing analytes. The worst case is cholesterol for which no stable protonated molecules were observed. On the other hand, ESI is not able to ionize any of the hydrocarbon analytes, saturated or unsaturated. However, ESI can be used to protonate the oxygen-containing analytes with substantially less fragmentation than for APCI in all cases except for cholesterol (extensive fragmentation) and estrone (no difference).
In conclusion, LIAD/ClMn(H2O)+ is the only method examined that is suitable for the mass spectrometric characterization of underivatized saturated hydrocarbon lipids. APCI (but not ESI) can be used to analyze unsaturated hydrocarbons. Both ESI and APCI are capable of ionizing the polar analytes but they both cause much more extensive fragmentation than ClMn(H2O)+ (the only exception being estrone).
Research Highlights
LIAD/ClMn(H2O)+ chemical ionization is superior over APCI and ESI for the mass spectrometric characterization of underivatized nonpolar lipids and steroids.
Acknowledgement
Deeply admired Professor Michael Gross is acknowledged for his invaluable contributions to the field of mass spectrometry. The authors would like to thank the National Institutes of Health for partial financial support of this work. The APCI and ESI research was supported as part of the Center for Direct Catalytic Conversion of Biomass to Biofuels (C3Bio), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Award Number DE-SC0000997.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Dedicated to esteemed Professor Michael Gross on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
References
- 1.Wenk MR. The emerging field of lipidomics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005;4:594–610. doi: 10.1038/nrd1776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Han XL, Gross RW. Shotgun lipidomics: Electrospray ionization mass spectrometric analysis and quantitation of cellular lipidomes directly from crude extracts of biological samples. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2005;24:367–412. doi: 10.1002/mas.20023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dugo P, Herrero M, Kumm T, Giuffrida D, Dugo G, Mondello L. Comprehensive normal-phase and reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to photodiode array and mass spectrometry detection for the analysis of free carotenoids and carotenoid esters from mandarin. J. Chromatogr. A. 2008;1189:196–206. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schweiggert U, Kammerer DR, Carle R, Schieber A. Characterization of carotenoids and carotenoid esters in red pepper pods (Capsicum annuum L.) by high-performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2005;19:2617–2628. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zirrolli JA, Murphy RC. Low-energy tandem mass spectrometry of the molecular ion derived from fatty-acid methyl esters - a novel method for analysis of branched-chain fatty acids. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1993;4:223–229. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(93)85085-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Acimovic J, Lovgren-Sandblom A, Monostory K, Rozman D, Golicnik M, Lutjohann D, Bjorkhem I. Combined gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis of cholesterol precursors and plant sterols in cultured cells. J. Chromatogr. B. 2009;877:2081–2086. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marnela KM, Moilanen T, Jutila M. Piperidine ester derivatives in mass-spectrometric analysis of fatty-acids from human-serum phospholipids and cholesteryl esters. Biomed. Environ. Mass Spectrom. 1988;16:443–446. doi: 10.1002/bms.1200160187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murphy RC, Fiedler J, Hevko J. Analysis of nonvolatile lipids by mass spectrometry. Chem. Rev. 2001;101:479–526. doi: 10.1021/cr9900883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hutchins PM, Barkley RM, Murphy RC. Separation of cellular nonpolar neutral lipids by normal-phase chromatography and analysis by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 2008;49:804–813. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M700521-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liebisch G, Binder M, Schifferer R, Langmann T, Schulz B, Schmitz G. High throughput quantification of cholesterol and cholesteryl ester by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2006;1761:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ma YC, Kim HY. Determination of steroids by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1997;8:1010–1020. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Byrdwell WC. Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry for analysis of lipids. Lipids. 2001;36:327–346. doi: 10.1007/s11745-001-0725-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rossmann B, Thurner K, Luf W. MS-MS fragmentation patterns of cholesterol oxidation products. Monatsh. Chem. 2007;138:436–444. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hagiwara T, Yasuno T, Funayama K, Suzuki S. Determination of lycopene, alpha-carotene and beta-carotene in serum by liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry with selected-ion monitoring. J. Chromatogr. B. 1998;708:67–73. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(97)00669-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sugiura Y, Setou M. Selective imaging of positively charged polar and nonpolar lipids by optimizing matrix solution composition. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2009;23:3269–3278. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Asbury GR, Al Saad K, Siems WF, Hannan RM, Hill HH. Analysis of triacylglycerols and whole oils by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1999;10:983–991. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Stubiger G, Belgacem O. Analysis of lipids using 2,4,6-trihydroxyacetophenone as a matrix for MALDI mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2007;79:3206–3213. doi: 10.1021/ac062236c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hoffmann ED, Stroobant V. Mass Spectromery: Principles and Applications. Second ed. Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2001. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duan P, Fu M, Pinkston DS, Habicht SC, Kenttämaa HI. Gas-Phase Reactions of ClMn(H2O)+ with Polar and Nonpolar Hydrocarbons in a Mass Spectrometer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:9266–9267. doi: 10.1021/ja073270r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Roussis SG, Fedora JW. Quantitative determination of polar and ionic compounds in petroleum fractions by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2002;16:1295–1303. doi: 10.1002/rcm.714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Higashi T, Shimada K. Derivatization of neutral steroids to enhance their detection characteristics in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004;378:875–882. doi: 10.1007/s00216-003-2252-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Van Berkel GJ, Quirke JME, Tigani RA, Dilley AS, Covey TR. Derivatization for electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. 3. Electrochemically ionizable derivatives. Anal. Chem. 1998;70:1544–1554. doi: 10.1021/ac971348o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Perez J, Ramirez-Arizmendi LE, Petzold CJ, Guler LP, Nelson ED, Kenttämaa HI. Laser-induced acoustic desorption/chemical ionization in Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000;198:173–188. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shea RC, Petzold CJ, Liu J, Kenttämaa HI. Experimental Investigations of the Internal Energy of Molecules Evaporated via Laser-Induced Acoustic Desorption into a Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2007;79:1825–1832. doi: 10.1021/ac061596x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Golovlev VV, Allman SL, Garrett WR, Taranenko NI, Chen CH. Laser-induced acoustic desorption. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997;169:69–78. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pinkston DS, Duan P, Gallardo VA, Habicht SC, Tan X, Qian K, Gray M, Mullen K, Kenttämaa HI. Analysis of asphaltenes and asphaltene model compounds by laser-induced acoustic desorption/Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Energy Fuels. 2009;23:5564–5570. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cheng SC, Cheng TL, Chang HC, Shiea J. Using laser-induced acoustic desorption/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to characterize small organic and large biological compounds in the solid state and in solution under ambient conditions. Anal. Chem. 2009;81:868–874. doi: 10.1021/ac800896y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lin YY, Smith LL. Chemical ionization mass spectrometry of steroids and other lipids. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1984;3:319–355. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Campbell JL, Crawford KE, Kenttämaa HI. Analysis of saturated hydrocarbons by using chemical ionization combined with laser-induced acoustic desorption/Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2004;76:959–963. doi: 10.1021/ac0350716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Crawford KE, Campbell JL, Fiddler MN, Duan P, Qian K, Gorbaty ML, Kenttämaa HI. Laser-induced acoustic desorption/Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry for petroleum distillate analysis. Anal. Chem. 2005;77:7916–7923. doi: 10.1021/ac0511501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McNeal CJ, MacFarlane RD, Thurston EL. Thin-film deposition by the electrospray method for Cf-252 plasma desorption studies of involatile molecules. Anal. Chem. 1979;51:2036–2039. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shea RC, Petzold CJ, Campbell JL, Li S, Aaserud DJ, Kenttämaa HI. Characterization of laser-induced acoustic desorption coupled with a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:6133–6139. doi: 10.1021/ac0602827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Reimer KJ, Shaver A. Pentacarbonylmanganese halides. Inorg. Synth. 1990;28:154–159. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen L, Wang TC, Ricca TL, Marshall AG. Phase-modulated stored waveform inverse Fourier transform excitation for trapped ion mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1987;59:449–454. doi: 10.1021/ac00130a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Duan P, Qian K, Habicht SC, Pinkston DS, Fu M, Kenttämaa HI. Analysis of base oil fractions by ClMn(H2O)+ chemical ionization combined with laser-induced acoustic desorption/Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2008;80:1847–1853. doi: 10.1021/ac702476p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sunner J, Nicol G, Kebarle P. Factors determining relative sensitivity of analytes in positive mode atmospheric-pressure ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 1988;60:1300–1307. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Horning EC, Horning MG, Carroll DI, Dzidic I, Stillwel RN. New pictogram detection system based on a mass spectrometer with an external Iinization source at atmospheric pressure. Anal. Chem. 1973;45:936–943. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nguyen S, Fenn JB. Gas-phase ions of solute species from charged droplets of solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007;104:1111–1117. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609969104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mcadoo DJ. Ion neutral complexes in unimolecular decompositions. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 1988;7:363–393. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shea RC, Habicht SC, Vaughn WE, Kenttämaa HI. Design and characterization of a high-power laser-induced acoustic desorption probe coupled with a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2007;79:2688–2694. doi: 10.1021/ac061597p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



