Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2011 Feb 23;50(12):2795–2798. doi: 10.1002/anie.201005280

Tandem Acyl Carrier Proteins in the Curacin Biosynthetic Pathway Promote Consecutive Multienzyme Reactions with a Synergistic Effect**

Liangcai Gu 1,2, Eli B Eisman 3, Somnath Dutta 4, Titus M Franzmann 5, Stefan Walter 5, William H Gerwick 6, Georgios Skiniotis 7, David H Sherman 8,*
PMCID: PMC3081611  NIHMSID: NIHMS286966  PMID: 21387490

Modular polyketide synthases (PKSs) are large multifunctional biosynthetic enzyme systems that assemble a remarkable array of secondary metabolites with a broad spectrum of biological activities. They are typically comprised of a chain initiation and termination module and multiple chain elongation modules. Chain elongation intermediates are covalently attached to a flexible phosphopantetheine (Ppant) arm of acyl carrier protein (ACP) domains embedded in the PKS modules. They are readily combined with other biosynthetic elements, (e.g., non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG) β-branching enzyme cassettes) for metabolic diversification.[1-3] These additional enzymes can alter the assembly and tailoring schemes of the original PKS pathways and result in unexpected structural modifications.[4] Many of these hybrid systems remain poorly understood, and biochemical studies have yet to reveal how new features are incorporated and refined in the pathways. However, knowledge gained from these versatile assemblies will guide future engineering of novel secondary metabolic systems.

The biosynthetic pathway for curacin A (Figure 1a), a mixed-polyketide nonribosomal-peptide marine natural product with potent anticancer activities,[5] is a prominent example of a hybrid PKS/NRPS system. In the curacin A chain initiation module, a bifunctional decarboxylase/S-acetyltransferase (GNATL) domain, instead of a “canonical” acyltransferase (AT) domain, catalyzes chain initiation.[6] A sulfotransferase domain inserted in the chain termination module was found to catalyze decarboxylative chain termination to form an unusual terminal olefin in the final product.[7] In addition, a ten-enzyme assembly, including a halogenase (Hal) domain, a HMG enzyme cassette, and an enoyl reductase (ER) domain, is incorporated into the first two PKS chain elongation modules, and catalyzes formation of a cyclopropane moiety (Figure 1a).[4]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Seqential enzyme reactions for tandem ACP3-linked intermediates. a) The malonyl-ACP substrate undergoes a six-step modification before it is translocated to the CurF PCP. b) Proposed adenylation and condensation/cyclization steps for CurF NRPS module.

One key component in the curacin A HMG enzyme cassette is a tandem ACP3 (ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII) tridomain with three almost identical ACPs. All the other enzymes in the ten-enzyme assembly, except CurB ACPIV and CurC ketosynthase (KS), catalyze modifications only on substrates linked to the tandem ACP3. Moreover, the ACP3 carries substrates for the first chain elongation module and is proposed to mediate substrate transfer to a peptidyl carrier protein (PCP) domain in a downstream CurF NRPS module, instead of an inactive CurF PKS module (Figure 1a).[8] Therefore, the tandem ACP3 might be involved in complex and sequential protein interactions with at least nine enzymes, including CurA AT, KS and Hal domains, CurD HMG-ACP synthase (HCS), CurE dehydratase (ECH1), and CurF decarboxylase (ECH2), ER, condensation/cyclization (Cy) and PCP domains (Figure 1).

Our current understanding of tandem ACP domains in polyketide or fatty acid pathways is that they enable sequential substrate modifications to occur in parallel. Genetic studies based on in vivo assays of truncations and active site mutants of tandem ACP domains in the mupirocin and polyunsaturated fatty acid pathways suggested that they can improve product yields.[9, 10] Biochemical studies on a tandem di-ACP in the bacillaene pathway showed that each domain can function in parallel.[3] Interestingly, tandem tri- or di-ACP domains are frequently associated with the HMG enzyme cassettes in hybrid PKS pathways (e.g., jamaicamide, bacillaene, mupriocin and pederin),[11-15] which catalyze consecutive modifications on tandem ACP-linked substrates (see the Supporting Information, Figure S1). Sequence comparison of the curacin A and jamaicamide pathways shows that these three ACP domains are the most conserved components in the ten-enzyme assembly (~95% sequence identity, except for linker regions between ACPs).[4] Thus, the ACP3 might serve as a special “relay station” to support sequential substrate modifications as well as substrate transfers in the hybrid PKS pathway. With this proposal in mind, additional biochemical analysis was needed to elucidate the structures and specific functions of these tandem ACPs, especially in the context of sequential multienzyme reactions.

Given the established sequential steps of Hal chlorination, ECH1 dehydration, ECH2 decarboxylation, and ER cyclopropanation from our previous studies,[2, 4, 6, 7, 16] as well as the functional CurF NRPS module developed in this work, we were motivated to assess biochemically how the tandem ACP3 can coordinate a four-step modification process (Figure 1a) and one-step translocation (Figure 1b) in an in vitro one-pot reaction.

We initiated a comparative analysis by overexpressing and purifying CurA ACP3 and a series of related proteins (all in apo form) derived from constructs bearing variant truncations and mutations. Our bioinformatic analysis suggested that the ACP3 is flanked by a C-terminal domain (Cd, CurA 2261-2311), which is also observed in the jamaicamide pathway with high sequence similarity (see the Supporting Information, Figure S2). Thus, CurA ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd tetradomain and ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII tridomain were prepared as N-terminal His-tagged fusion proteins (see the Supporting Information, Figure S3a). Five truncation constructs, including ACPI-ACPII, ACPII-ACPIII, ACPI, ACPII and ACPIII, and nine single and double Ser→Ala ACP active-site mutations on the ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII and ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd constructs were generated (see the Supporting Information, Figure S3). To prepare the ACP-linked HMG substrate for the one-pot reaction, all the ACP3 constructs, truncations and mutants were loaded with (S)-HMG-CoA by the Sfp phosphopantetheinyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis as previously described.[4, 17]

Next, we sought to analyze tertiary and quaternary structures of the tandem ACP3 by using analytic size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). All the apo ACP3 constructs and truncations were analyzed by SEC to calculate “estimated molecular weights (MWs)”. The estimated MWs of polypeptides containing a single ACP domain were close to their actual MWs (Table 1). In contrast, the estimated MWs of those with two or three ACP domains were ~1.8-fold their actual MWs, suggesting flexible didomain or tridomain structures lacking ACP-ACP domain interactions to fold into globular structures. When the Cd domain with a predicted α-helix-dominant secondary structure remains at the ACP3 C-terminus, corresponding to an 8.6 kDa mass addition, the estimated MW changed from 63.1 kDa to 106.6 kDa (Table 1, see Supporting Information, Figure S4). To determine whether the dimerization process is more facile in ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd, we compared it against ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII by using analytical ultracentrifugation and negative stain electron microscopy (EM) analyses. Under analytical ultracentrifugation conditions, the major population of the tetradomain and tridomain polypeptides were captured as monomeric forms (42.0 and 36.8 kDa, respectively). However, the EM analysis shows that both multi-domain proteins exist as a mixture of monomers and dimers (see Supporting Information, Figure S5 and S6), with ~70% of ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd, compared to ~25% of ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII, existing as dimers (see Supporting Information, Figure S7). This data suggests that the C-terminal Cd domain results in a shift of monomer-dimer equilibrium toward dimerization. Moreover, various conformations of protein particles were observed by EM, verifying that the tandem ACP domains adopt a flexible quaternary structure.

Table 1.

Estimated molecular weight of the CurA ACP3 constructs.

ACP construct Calc. MW
[kDa]
Estimated (SEC) MW
[kDa]
ACPI 10.9 13.1 ± 0.5
ACPII 11.3 14.2 ± 0.5
ACPIII 11.0 13.2 ± 0.7
ACPI-ACPII 23.6 42.3 ± 2.5
ACPII-ACPIII 22.6 40.7 ± 2.0
ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII 36.0 63.1 ± 5.1
ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd 44.6 106.6 ± 7.3

Our starting point for biochemical assays was to prepare the soluble forms of the apo and the Ser→Ala PCP active-site mutant of CurF Cy-adenylation (A) domain-PCP tridomain and the excised PCP domain with a C-terminal His-tag (see the Supporting Information, Figure S3a). We next sought to confirm the proposed adenylation and condensation/cyclization activities of the A and Cy domains (Figure 1b), respectively, by detecting a proposed product with a thiazoline ring on the PCP (Figure 1b). The ACP3-linked cyclopropane substrate was generated by loading the corresponding acyl-CoA substrate onto the apo ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd, and then incubated with apo CurF Cy-A-PCP, Sfp, CoA and L-cysteine. To facilitate further analysis, the Cy-A-PCP was purified from the reaction mixtures by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The product was cleaved from the Cy-A-PCP by a hydrolysis reaction,[18] and then confirmed as 1 by comparison with an authentic standard using liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry (MS) (Figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

a) LC-MS detection of 1 cleaved from the Cy-A-PCP. b) Relative yields of 1 from one-pot reactions with variant HMG-linked ACP3 constructs, truncations and mutants. The asterisk denotes an unidentified diastereomer of 1. See the Supporting Information for reaction conditions.

With the enzymes and substrates in hand, we assessed how the tandem ACP3 tridomain can affect an overall yield of the consecutive five-step enzyme reactions. To optimize quantification of the final product 1 by LC-MS, the one-pot reaction was performed by incubating stoichiometric amounts of the ACP-linked HMG and PCP-linked l-cysteine substrates (see Supporting Information) with the enzymes to achieve multiple turnovers, including the Hal, ECH1, ECH2, ER and the Ser→Ala mutant of Cy-A-PCP. The final product was subsequently cleaved from the purified PCP for LC-MS quantification. For comparison of all the ACP3 constructs, including the truncated and mutant forms, the stoichiometric amount of the HMG substrate remained the same based on numbers of active ACP domains on the substrate polypeptides (e.g., one-fold ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII corresponds to 1.5-fold ACPI-ACPII or 3-fold double active-site mutant of ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII). The reaction time was adjusted to ensure less than half of the PCP was occupied by the final product.

The analysis above revealed that relative yields of 1 from the one-pot reactions using the polypeptides with only one ACP active site (except those flanked by Cd) are similar (~9%), regardless of the ACP domains excised from or embedded in the ACP3 tridomain (Figure 2b). This is consistent with the previous finding that tandem ACPs are functionally equivalent.[3, 10] For those with two or three active ACP domains (not including ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd), the product yields were increased to ~19-25% and 37%, respectively. Thus, these data reveal that at the same HMG substrate concentration, tandem ACP domains function not only in parallel, but with an unexpected synergistic effect. Notably, the relative yields of the reaction with ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd or mutants of ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd containing a single active ACP were 100%, and ~26-30% respectively, which are significantly higher than those lacking the Cd domain. This is likely due to enhanced ACPI-ACPII-ACPIII-Cd dimerization and specific protein-protein interactions mediated by the Cd domain.

In typical PKS pathways, an ACP-linked malonyl or methylmalonyl substrate first undergoes a Claisen condensation catalyzed by KS, and then may be modified by keto reduction, dehydration and enoyl reduction by ketoreductase, dehydratase, and enoylreductase catalytic domains, respectively, before it is transferred to a downstream KS domain. However, the CurA malonyl-ACP3 substrates participate in additional modification steps that might compromise catalytic efficiency of the entire pathway. Our study indicates that the efficiency of the five-step enzyme reaction series increases with the level of ACP domain aggregation (e.g., mono-ACP domain vs. di-, tri- or hexa-ACP domains). In principle, the clustering of ACP-linked substrates might result in binding of adjacent enzymes to corresponding substrates via non-specific enzyme-substrate interactions. For example, enzymes associated with ACP-linked substrates usually can bind to the ACP Ppant arm.[16, 19, 20] In the Cur system this interaction appears to be essential based on the decreased yields of product observed in Ser→Ala ACP active-site mutants devoid of Ppant arms. Thus, the tandem organization of ACP domains can promote formation of multienzyme complexes in sequential reactions, thus facilitating rapid access and pairing of enzymes and substrates. This represents a highly effective strategy of nature to improve sequential multienzyme reactions, and is of significance for de novo design of natural product pathways by metabolic engineering.

Supplementary Material

Supp Data

Footnotes

**

This work was supported by NIH grant GM076477 and the Hans W. Vahlteich Professorship (to D.H.S.). L.G. is supported by Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship and Jane Coffin Childs Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.angewandte.org or from the author.

References

  • 1.Walsh CT. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41:4. doi: 10.1021/ar7000414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gu L, Jia J, Liu H, Hakansson K, Gerwick WH, Sherman DH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:9014. doi: 10.1021/ja0626382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Calderone CT, Kowtoniuk WE, Kelleher NL, Walsh CT, Dorrestein PC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:8977. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603148103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gu L, Wang B, Kulkarni A, Geders TW, Grindberg RV, Gerwick L, Hakansson K, Wipf P, Smith JL, Gerwick WH, Sherman DH. Nature. 2009;459:731. doi: 10.1038/nature07870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Verdier-Pinard P, Lai J, Yoo H, Yu J, Marquez B, Nagle DG, Nambu M, White JD, Falck JR, Gerwick WH, Day BW, Hamel E. Mol. Pharmacol. 1998;53:62. doi: 10.1124/mol.53.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gu L, Geders TW, Wang B, Gerwick WH, Hakansson K, Smith JL, Sherman DH. Science. 2007;318:970. doi: 10.1126/science.1148790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gu L, Wang B, Kulkarni A, Gehret JJ, Lloyd KR, Gerwick L, Gerwick WH, Wipf P, Hakansson K, Smith JL, Sherman DH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009;131:16033. doi: 10.1021/ja9071578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chang Z, Sitachitta N, Rossi JV, Roberts MA, Flatt PM, Jia J, Sherman DH, Gerwick WH. J. Nat. Prod. 2004;67:1356. doi: 10.1021/np0499261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rahman AS, Hothersall J, Crosby J, Simpson TJ, Thomas CM. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:6399. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409814200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiang H, Zirkle R, Metz JG, Braun L, Richter L, Van Lanen SG, Shen B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:6336. doi: 10.1021/ja801911t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Butcher RA, Schroeder FC, Fischbach MA, Straightt PD, Kolter R, Walsh CT, Clardy J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U A. 2007;104:1506. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610503104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.El-Sayed AK, Hothersall J, Cooper SM, Stephens E, Simpson TJ, Thomas CM. Chem. Biol. 2003;10:419. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(03)00091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Piel J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:14002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.222481399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Piel J, Hui D, Wen G, Butzke D, Platzer M, Fusetani N, Matsunaga S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:16222. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405976101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Edwards DJ, Marquez BL, Nogle LM, McPhail K, Goeger DE, Roberts MA, Gerwick WH. Chem. Biol. 2004;11:817. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Geders TW, Gu L, Mowers JC, Liu H, Gerwick WH, Hakansson K, Sherman DH, Smith JL. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:35954. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703921200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Quadri LE, Weinreb PH, Lei M, Nakano MM, Zuber P, Walsh CT. Biochemistry. 1998;37:1585. doi: 10.1021/bi9719861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kelly WL, Hillson NJ, Walsh CT. Biochemistry. 2005;44:13385. doi: 10.1021/bi051124x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khosla C, Tang Y, Chen A, Schnarr NA, Cane DE. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007;76:11.1. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.053105.093515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khare D, Wang B, Gu L, Razelun J, Sherman DH, Gerwick WH, Håkansson K, Smith JL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:14099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006738107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Data

RESOURCES