Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Chem. 2011 Mar 29;54(8):2924–2932. doi: 10.1021/jm200020a

Further structure-activity relationship studies on 4-((((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)amino)methyl)phenol: Identification of compounds with triple uptake inhibitory activity as potential antidepressant agents

Bhaskar Gopishetty 1, Stuart Hazeldine 1, Soumava Santra 1, Mark Johnson 1, Gyan Modi 1, Solav Ali 2, Juan Zhen 2, Maarten Reith 2,3, Aloke Dutta 1,*
PMCID: PMC3085959  NIHMSID: NIHMS284757  PMID: 21446715

Abstract

To investigate structural alterations of the lead triple uptake inhibitor molecule, disubstituted 4-((((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)amino)methyl)phenol, we have carried out structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies to investigate the effect of alteration of aromatic substitutions and introduction of heterocyclic aromatic moieties on this molecular template. The novel compounds were tested for their affinities for the dopamine transporter (DAT), serotonin transporter (SERT), and norepinephrine transporter (NET) in the brain by measuring their potency in inhibiting the uptake of [3H]DA, [3H]5-HT, and [3H]NE, respectively. SAR results indicate dopamine norepinephrine reuptake inhibitory (DNRI) type activity in thiophene (10g) and pyrrole (10i) derivatives. On the other hand, 3-hydroxy phenyl derivative 10f and 4-methoxy phenyl derivative 10j exhibited a triple reuptake inhibitory (TUI) activity profile as these molecules exhibited potent uptake inhibition for all the monoamine transporters (Ki; 31.3, 40, 38.5 and 15.9, 12.9, 29.3 for DAT, SERT and NET, for 10f and 10g respectively). Compound 10f was further evaluated in the rat forced swim test to evaluate its potential antidepressant effect. The results show significant reduction of immobility by TUI 10f at 10 mg/kg dose, indicating potential antidepressant activity.

Introduction

Depression, especially major depression disorder, significantly affects a high percentage of the population (15–20%) and is regarded as a significant health problem. Unipolar depression is ranked as number one before all other somatic and psychiatric illnesses.1, 2 It is believed that at least 20% of all individuals suffer from a depressive episode at least once in their lifetime. Depression is potentially fatal since most sufferers consider life threatening acts and suicide.3, 4

Selective monoamine uptake inhibitors have been used in the treatment of depression.5 Among those, especially serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporter blockers have been used in the therapy for depression.6, 7 However, in spite of developments of different arrays of antidepressants, there still remains a significant unmet need for more improved therapy as a large number of depressed people are still refractory to the current existing therapies.8 Also a significant number of people relapse after treatment with current therapies 9. Although current pharmacotherapies of depression do not address the dopaminergic component, there is ample clinical and biochemical evidence pointing towards a strong dopaminergic component in depression.10, 11 It is hypothesized that a triple uptake inhibitor (TUI) interacting with all three monoamine transporters would display reduced side effects associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).12, 13 Recently, TUIs have been shown to be potent antidepressants in animal models and therefore are being advanced as novel treatment tools offering certain advantages.1416 Due to their interaction at three monoamine transporters, this class of drug could potentially provide faster onset of action. The enhanced efficacy of a TUI as an antidepressant may be due to the additional dopaminergic component, which can effectively relieve depression by activating mesocorticolimbic dopaminergic pathways, reducing anhedonia associated with a deficit in dopaminergic transmission.

In recent years a number of TUIs, e.g. DOV 21,947, and PRC200-SS, have been developed and have been characterized in animal antidepressant models.17, 18 Some of these molecules are shown in Figure 1. In our previous studies on monoamine transporters, we developed a unique pyran template as a bioisosteric extension of piperidine derivatives, which we originally synthesized for targeting the dopamine transporter (DAT).1927 Initially, we identified unique asymmetric di- and tri-substituted pyran derivatives inhibiting uptake of all three monoamine transporters with higher potency for the 5-HT transporter (SERT) and NE transporter (NET), and modest potency for the dopamine transporter (DAT). Dual acting inhibitors as blockers of both SERT and NET, as well as selective blockers for NET were also identified. Asymmetric synthesis methods have been developed by us to generate these molecules.26, 27 The results indicated stereospecific requirement for interaction of these molecules with the monoamine transporters as the interaction was mainly exhibited in the (-)isomers. One of our lead TUIs, 1c (D-161) (Figure 2), was recently shown to posses antidepressant–like activity in animal studies.28

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Molecular structures of known clinical and preclinical antidepressants.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Molecular structures of lead asymmetric pyran TUIs.

In our current work, we extended our SAR studies further with asymmetric disubstituted pyran derivatives to understand the effect of different aromatic substitutions on affinity and selectivity for different monoamine transporters.

Chemistry

Scheme 1 describes the synthesis of the key amine intermediate 8, which was used towards the synthesis of target compounds as shown in Scheme 2 and Scheme 3. Briefly, regioselective ring-opening of the (R)-epoxide 1 with allylmagnesium chloride in the presence of a catalytic amount of copper(I) iodide afforded alcohol 2 in good yield. Trans-vinylation of alcohol 2 with ethyl vinyl ether in the presence of mercury(II) trifluoroacetate at room temperature provided compound 3, which was immediately converted to cyclic olefin 4 by ring-closing metathesis. Hydroboration of olefin 4 with 9-BBN in THF, followed by oxidation gave an inseparable mixture containing majority trans-isomer 5a. The mixture of compounds 5a and 5b was mesylated with methanesulfonyl chloride in dichloromethane in presence of triethyl amine and separated by column chromatography to give the trans- compound 6a in 74.7% yield and cis-compound 6b in 12.4% yield (trans:cis = 6:1). Compound 6a was then treated with sodium azide in DMF to give azide 7, which was finally hydrogenated with Pd/C in methanol to obtain the optically active cis-amine intermediate 8 in quantitative yield. Scheme 2 outlines the synthesis of the final compounds 9a–f by treating amine 8 with corresponding optically active (R)- and (S)-epoxides.

Scheme 1a.

Scheme 1a

a Reagents and conditions: (a) Allylmagnesium chloride, ether, −78 °C - rt, overnight, 82.4%; (b) Ethyl vinyl ether, Hg(OCOCF3)2, rt, 4 h, 63.4%; (c) 1st generation Grubb’s catalyst, benzene, reflux, 2 h, 67.6%; (d) (i) 9-BBN, THF, rt, overnight; (ii) 10% NaOH, 30% H2O2, 50 °C, 1 h, 90%; (e) CH3SO2Cl, Et3N, dichloromethane, rt, 2 h, 74.7% for 6a, 12.4% for 6b; (f) NaN3, DMF, 80 °C, overnight, 81.1%; (g) H2, Pd-C, MeOH, 50 psi, 2 h, quantitative yield.

Scheme 2a.

Scheme 2a

a Reagents and Conditions: (a) Epoxide, EtOH, reflux, overnight

Scheme 3a.

Scheme 3a

aReagents and conditions: a) RCHO, NaCNBH4, AcOH, dichloroethane, rt, overnight

Similarly, reductive amination of amine 8 with various aldehydes furnished target compounds 10a–j as shown in Scheme 3.

Results and Discussion

We have successfully developed an improved version of the synthesis of asymmetric disubstituted pyran derivative precursor as described in Scheme 1. This involved fewer synthetic steps to make 3,6-disubstituted compounds as compared to our previous published report.27

In our previous SAR studies, we have shown that substitutions on the N-benzylic aromatic ring had a significant influence on the profile of monoamine uptake inhibition. One of the interesting findings from those studies was that the presence of H-bond forming functionality in the aromatic ring conferred higher potency for the NET. Compounds 1d (D-185), 1b (D-168), and 1 with amino and hydroxyl groups at the para position exhibited a TUI profile withc potent activity at the NET.27 In the current SAR studies, we wanted to further explore 3,6-disubstituted compounds by introducing various aromatic substitutions and side chain expansion on the exocyclic N-atom.

Scheme 2 describes epoxide ring opening from 3,6-disubstituted amine precursor 8. The rationale behind designing these compounds stems from the observation that in the GBR class of compounds such side chain extension via opening of epoxide led to development of potent molecules for DAT and SERT.29 Regioselective ring-opening of different substituted (R)-styrene epoxides by the amine precursor 8 produced R-hydroxy compounds 9a, 9c and 9e. On the other hand, regioselective ring-opening of similar (S)-epoxides by the same amine precursor yielded S-hydroxy compounds 9b, 9d and 9f. None of the R-hydroxy compounds exhibited potent activity except 4-fluoro phenyl substituted compound 9c which displayed moderate potency at DAT (Ki; 71 nM). Similarly, corresponding diastereomers S-hydroxy compounds 9d and 9f did not exhibit much potent activity except 9b which exhibited moderate potency at DAT (Ki; 54 nM).

In our next series, we planned to systematically explore the influence of heterocyclic and substituted aromatic moieties in the disubstituted pyran template. Since the initial development of pyran derivatives, influences of N-heterocyclic substitutions have not been explored. In the starting pyridine series, 2- (10a), 3- (10b) and 4-substituted (10c) pyridines were designed and synthesized. Interestingly, the 4-pyridine substituted compound 10c exhibited selective interaction with DAT (Ki; 28.3, 889 and 462 for DAT, SERT and NET (Table 1 and Table 2), respectively) whereas the other two pyridine compounds were weak at all three transporters. This indicates the importance of the position of the N-atom in the pyridine ring in interacting with the monoamine transporters. In our next exploration of heterocyclic aromatic moieties, thiophene derivative 10g, furan derivative 10h and pyrrole derivative 10i were designed and synthesized. Thiophene derivative 10g and pyrrole derivative 10i exhibited interesting dual DAT/NET potency (Ki (DAT & NET); 41.4 & 47.2 nM for 10g and 43.2 & 39.6 nM for 10i), whereas furan derivative 10h exhibited two-fold selective potency for NET (Ki; 59.8 nM for NET VS. 110 and 115 nM for DAT and SERT (Table 1 and Table 2, respectively).

Table 1.

Affinity of drugs at DAT, SERT, and NET in rat brain.

Compound DAT uptake, Ki, nM, [3H]DAa SERT uptake, Ki, nM, [3H]-5-HTa NET uptake, Ki, nM [3H]NEa
GBR 12909 16.2 ± 1.6 198 ± 19 48.5 ± 7.4
Reboxetine NDb 503 ± 61 0.826 ± 0.25
Fluoxetine 1092 ± 98 12.2 ± 2.4 120 ± 41?
1a 37.4 ± 3.9 14.7 ± 2.1 29.3 ± 7.9
1b 85.2 ± 8.2 25.0 ± 8.4 25.5 ± 9.6
1c 42.0 ± 3.3 29.1 ± 3.5 30.5 ± 7.8
9a 145 ± 16 936 ± 68 162 ± 34.6
9b 54.0 ± 8.5 796 ± 94 298 ± 45
9c 71.8 ± 13.6 1,140 ± 208 546 ± 97
9d 106 ± 28 825 ± 169 222 ± 62
9e 125 ± 31 1,092 ± 161 429 ± 245
9f 137 ± 9 646 ± 118 299 ± 34
10a 209 ± 20 483 ± 63 505 ± 220
10b 145 ± 51 152 ± 11 353 ± 60
10c 28.3 ± 11.6 889 ± 61 462 ± 86
10d 473 ± 134 88.8 ± 21.7 232 ± 54
10e 200 ± 28 440 ± 96 160 ± 38
10f 31.3 ± 10.6 40.1 ± 4.9 38.5 ± 6.0
10g 41.4 ± 8.9 186 ± 43 47.2 ± 15.4
10h 110 ± 23 115 ± 5 59.8 ± 0.6
10i 43.2 ± 1.8 141 ± 2 39.6 ± 3.5
10j 15.9 ± 1.7 12.9 ± 1.3 29.3 ± 4.8
a

For uptake by DAT, SERT and NET, [3H]DA, [3H]-5-HT and [3H]NE accumulation was measured. Results are average ± SEM of three to eight independent experiments assayed in triplicate.

b

Not Done

Table 2.

Selectivity of drugs (ratio of Ki) in inhibiting uptake by monoamine transporters

Compound DAT uptake/ SERT uptakea DAT uptake/ NET uptakea SERT uptake/ NET uptakea
9a 0.15 0.9 5.78
9b 0.07 0.18 2.67
9c 0.06 0.13 2.09
9d 0.13 0.48 3.72
9e 0.11 0.29 2.55
9f 0.21 0.46 2.16
10a 0.43 0.41 0.96
10b 0.95 0.41 0.43
10c 0.03 0.06 1.92
10d 5.33 2.04 0.38
10e 0.45 1.25 2.75
10f 0.78 0.81 1.04
10g 0.22 0.88 3.94
10h 0.96 1.84 1.92
10i 0.31 1.09 3.56
10j 1.23 0.54 0.44
a

Ratio of Ki values.

In our next series of molecules, we focused on phenyl substituted compounds. In our exploration to evaluate effect of enhanced hydrophobicity on N-aromatic substitution, we replaced the phenyl moiety by a napthalene ring to produce 10d. However, such replacement only produced moderate potency for SERT (Ki; 88.8 nM). Next we wanted to explore the positional effect of the hydroxyl group on the aromatic ring in 1c, through compounds 10e and 10f. The 3-hydroxyl substituted compound 10f (Ki; 31. 40 and 38 for DAT, SERT and NET, respectively) exhibited a TUI-like profile very similar to 1c whereas 2-hydroxyl substituted 10e was much less potent at the three transporters. The low activity of 10e might be due to the location of the hydroxyl group at the 2-position giving rise to an unfavorable steric interaction. Next, we wanted to evaluate the methoxylated derivative of 1c, 10j. The uptake inhibition results indicate higher potencies for DAT and SERT compared to 1c in the methoxylated derivative (Ki; 15.9 and 12.9 vs. 42 and 29 nM for DAT and SERT, respectively for 10j).

Finally, we subjected one of our lead TUIs, 10f, to the forced swim test (FST) in rats to measure its potential antidepressant effect. Extended CNS receptor screening of this compound at 10 μM indicated less than 50% inhibition with majority of the receptor target sites and greater than 50% inhibition at a few other target sites (only marginally so in some cases, see supporting information section for the data Table). The forced swim test has been used widely as a preclinical model for screening drugs for antidepressant activity and has been applied to characterize a broad spectrum of antidepressants 30, 31. This assay, with some limitations, is considered a very good predictor of antidepressant activity of a test compound. Based on our previous experience, we chose 10 mg/kg as a moderately high dose to study the effect of this compound on immobility. It is evident from the results (Fig. 3) that compound 10f at 10 mg /kg exhibited significant reduction of immobility compared to vehicle, as did the reference drug imipramine at 15 mg/kg dose. Thus, the results suggest that compound 10f may have antidepressant activity.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Effect of sub-chronic administration of vehicle (10% β-hydroxypropyl cyclodextrin solution), 10f and imipramine on the duration of immobility in the forced swimming test in rats. One way ANOVA analysis demonstrated significant effect among treatments: F (4,95) = 13.70 (P< 0.008). Dunnett’s analysis showed that the effect of 10f at 10 mg/kg dose on immobility was statistically significantly different compared to vehicle (P< 0.01). The effect of imipramine (15 mg/kg) on immobility was also statistically significantly different (P< 0.05) from vehicle. Asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference toward control group that received saline i.p. **P < 0.05 or 0.01. Each treatment group contained six to seven rats.

Conclusion

We have carried out further SAR studies with disubstituted pyran derivatives. Introduction of exocyclic hydroxyl groups on the N-alkyl-phenyl moiety did not produce any further improvement of activity. Replacement of the phenyl ring in compound 1c by the heterocyclic 4-pyridine moiety produced potent activity for the DAT in compound 10c. Further replacement by five membered heterocycles e.g. furan, thiophene and pyrole, produced interesting dopamine norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (DNRI)-type activity in 10g and 10i. Furthermore, compounds 10f and 10j exhibited triple uptake inhibitory activity. Finally, in the rat FST experiment, compound 10f exhibited high efficacy in reducing immobility, indicating a potential antidepressant effect. In this regard, 10f was more efficacious than imipramine which might indicate higher efficacy of TUI in this animal model. In the near future we plan to examine this molecule further for its potential antidepressant property.

Experimental Section

Reagents and solvents were obtained from commercial suppliers and used as received unless otherwise indicated. Dry solvents were obtained according to the standard procedures. All reactions were performed under inert atmosphere (N2) unless otherwise noted. Analytical silica gel-coated TLC plates (Si 250F) were purchased from Baker Inc. and were visualized with UV light or by treatment with phosphomolybdic acid (PMA). Flash chromatography was carried out on Baker Silica Gel 40 mM. 1H NMR and 13C spectra were routinely recorded with a Varian 400 spectrometer operating at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively. The NMR solvent used was CDCl3 as indicated. TMS was used as an internal standard. NMR and rotation of free bases were recorded. Salts of free bases were used for biological characterization. Elemental analyses were performed by Atlantic Microlab Inc. and were within ± 0.4% of the theoretical value.

[Ring 2,5,6-3H]dopamine (38.7 Ci/mmol), [1,2-3H]serotonin (28.0 Ci/mmol), and levo-[ring-2,5,6-3H]norepinephrine (44.6 Ci/mmol) were obtained from Perkin-Elmer (Boston, MA, USA). Imipramine, fluoxetine, reboxetine, and GBR 12909 dihydrochloride (1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-[3-phenylpropyl]piperazine) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

(S)-1,1-diphenylhex-5-en-2-ol (2)

To a stirred solution of (R)-2-benzhydryloxirane26 (4.5 g, 21.40 mmol) in anhydrous diethyl ether (90 mL) was added copper (I) iodide (0.41 g, 2.14 mmol) and allylmagnesium chloride (13.37 mL, 2 M solution in tetrahydrofuran, 26.75 mmol) at −78 °C. After stirring overnight at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere, the reaction mixture at 0 °C was quenched by addition of saturated NH4Cl solution (50 mL), and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 X 75 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water (50 mL), brine (50 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by silica-gel column chromatography using 10% ethyl acetate in hexanes to give compound 2 (4.45 g, 82%) as a thick colorless syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.44–1.64 (m, 3H), 2.12–2.21 (m, 1H), 2.25–2.34 (m, 1H), 3.89 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.34–4.40 (m, 1H), 4.93–5.04 (m, 2H), 5.72–5.83 (m, 1H), 7.18–7.42 (m, 10H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 30.41, 34.42, 59.14, 73.40, 115.13, 126.82, 127.14, 128.50, 128.92, 129.05, 129.09, 138.72, 141.69, 142.60.

(S)-(2-(vinyloxy)hex-5-ene-1,1-diyl)dibenzene (3)

To a stirred solution of alcohol 2 (2.6 g, 10.30 mmol) in excess of ethyl vinyl ether (100 mL) was added mercury (II) trifluoroacetate (0.88 g, 2.06 mmol) at room temperature, and stirring was continued for 4 h under a nitrogen atmosphere. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure at room temperature. The crude product was dissolved in 5% ethyl acetate in hexanes, filtered through a basic alumina pad quickly, and the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure at room temperature to give product 3 (1.82 g, 63%) as a thick light-yellow syrup. The unreacted starting material 2 (0.65 g, 25%) was also recovered by washing the used basic alumina pad with 15% ethyl acetate in hexanes. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.55–1.72 (m, 2H), 2.05–2.22 (m, 2H), 3.83 (dd, J = 1.6, 6.4 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J = 1.6, 14.0 Hz, 1H), 4.45 (dt, J = 4.0, 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.80–5.06 (m, 2H), 5.68–5.78 (m, 1H), 6.12 (dd, J = 6.4, 14.0 HZ, 1H), 7.16–7.36 (m, 10). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.70, 32.57, 56.21, 82.10, 88.20, 115.45, 126.72, 126.84, 128.56, 128.81, 128.85, 129.24, 138.22, 141.62, 142.28, 152.23.

(S)-2-benzhydryl-3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran (4)

To a stirred solution of compound 3 (1.65 g, 5.93 mmol) in anhydrous benzene (80 mL) was added Grubb’s (1st generation) catalyst (0.24 g, 0.3 mmol) at room temperature under nitrogen atmosphere. The reaction mixture was slowly heated to reflux and the refluxing was continued for 2 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 5% ethyl acetate in hexanes and recrystallized in hexanes to give compound 4 (1 g, 68%) as a white solid. Mp: 68–70°C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.52–1.62 (m, 1H), 1.72–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.92–2.10 (m, 2H), 4.05 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (dt, J = 2.4, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 4.67–4.72 (m, 1H), 6.35 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 7.16–7.42 (m, 10H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 20.01, 26.49, 56.46, 76.64, 100.86, 126.66, 126.85, 128.60, 128.70, 128.88, 142.12, 142.42, 144.06.

6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-ol (mixture of 5a and 5b)

To a stirred solution of compound 4 (2.8 g, 11.18 mmol) in anhydrous THF (10 mL) was added 9-BBN (56 mL, 0.5 M solution in tetrahydrofuran, 27.96 mmol) under a nitrogen atmosphere. After stirring overnight at room temperature, the reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C, quenched by the addition of ethanol (15 mL) and stirred for 10 min. Next, aqueous 10% NaOH solution (15 mL) and 30% H2O2 (10 mL) were added and the resulting solution was heated to 50 °C for 1h. After cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was treated with water (40 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 X 75 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water (40 mL), brine (40 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 25% ethyl acetate in hexanes to give mixture of inseparable compounds 5a and 5b (2.7 g, 90%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.34–1.45 (m, 3H), 1.53–1.61 (m, 1H), 2.01–2.09 (m, 1H), 3.14 (t, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 3.62–3.70 (m, 1H), 3.91 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 3.95–4.04 (m, 2H), 7.16–7.37 (m, 10H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.68, 33.01, 57.55, 66.24, 73.18, 79.09, 126.68, 126.92, 128.73, 128.78, 128.81, 128.86, 128.99, 142.57, 142.64, 142.96.

(3R,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl methanesulfonate (6a)

To an ice cooled a stirred mixture of compounds 5a and 5b (2.7 g, 10.06 mmol) and triethylamine (2.8 mL, 20.12 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (60 mL) was added methanesulfonyl chloride (1.17 mL, 15.09 mmol) under a nitrogen atmosphere. After stirring 2 h at room temperature, the reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 X 75 mL) and water (40 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water (40 mL), brine (40 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using 25% ethyl acetate in hexanes to elute the trans compound 6a (2.6 g, 75%) first as a white solid followed by cis compound 6b (0.43 g, 12%) as a white solid. Spectral data for 6a: Mp: 110–112°C. [α]25D= (-) 48.4°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.42–1.52 (m, 1H, H-5ax), 1.62–1.78 (m, 2H, H-4ax, H-5eq), 2.21–2.30 (m, 1H, H-4eq), 2.99 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.37 (t, J = 10.4 Hz, 1H, H-2ax), 3.89 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, Ph2CH), 4.02 (dt, J = 2.0, 9.2 Hz, 1H, H-6ax), 4.10–4.18 (m, 1H, H-2eq), 4.58–4.66 (m, 1H, H-3ax), 7.14–7.32 (m, 10H, aromatic). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 29.51, 30.58, 38.68, 57.12, 69.87, 75.27, 79.04, 126.73, 126.96, 128.59, 128.65, 128.68, 128.93, 141.97, 142.34.

(2S,5S)-5-azido-2-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran (7)

To a stirred solution of compound 6a (2.5 g, 7.22 mmol) in DMF (60 mL) was added sodium azide (2.35 g, 36.08 mmol). After stirring over night at 80 °C, the reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, was treated with water (40 mL), and extracted with ethyl ether (3 X 75 mL). The combined organic layers ware washed with water (40 mL), brine (40 mL), dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 5% ethyl acetate in hexanes to give compound 7 (1.72 g, 81%) as a white solid. Mp: 93–95°C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.32–1.38 (m, 1H), 1.59–1.70 (m, 1H), 1.73–1.82 (m, 1H), 1.94–2.20 (m, 1H), 3.52–3.57(m, 1H), 3.63 (dd, J = 1.6, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.95–4.10 (m, 3H), 7.16–7.38 (m, 10H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.43, 27.68, 55.58, 57.55, 69.80, 79.45, 126.56, 126.81, 128.57, 128.64, 128.73, 128.84, 142.23.

(3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (8)

Azide 7 (0.65 g, 2.21 mmol) in methanol (40 mL) was hydrogenated (50 psi) in the presence of 10% Pd-C (65 mg, 10wt %) for 2 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through a short bed of Celite and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to afford amine 8 (0.65 g) as a light yellow solid in quantitative yield. The product was pure enough for continuation to the next step. Mp: 92–94°C. [α]25D= (-) 76.8°, c = 1.0 in MeOH 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.24–1.44 (m, 3H), 1.52–1.62 (m, 1H), 1.63–1.80 (m, 2H), 2.89 (br s, 1H), 3.62–3.66 (m, 1H), 3.74–3.80 (m, 1H), 3.96 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (dt, J = 2.4, 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.12–7.37 (m, 10). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.86, 31.06, 45.55, 57.58, 73.92, 79.60, 126.50, 126.69, 128.56, 128.72, 128.76, 142.40, 142.65.

Procedure A. (R)-2-((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-ylamino)-1-phenylethanol (9a)

A mixture of amine 8 (50 mg, 0.19 mmol) and (R)-2-phenyloxirane (27 mg, 0.22 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (3 mL) was refluxed under nitrogen atmosphere overnight. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 3% methanol in ethyl acetate to afford compound 9a (40 mg, 56%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.28–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.45–1.55 (m, 1H), 1.67 (tt, J = 4.0, 13.6 Hz, 1H), 1.82–1.92 (m, 1H), 2.57 (dd, J = 9.6, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 2.65 (br s, 1H), 2.91 (dd, J = 3.6, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (dd, J = 1.2, 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.90–3.98 (m, 2H), 4.05 (dt, J = 2.0, 10.4 Hz, 1H), 4.63 (dd, J = 3.6, 9.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12–7.40 (m, 15H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.63, 26.64, 51.16, 53.74, 57.12, 68.84, 71.83, 79.11, 125.66, 125.97, 126.28, 127.49, 128.02, 128.14, 128.20, 128.29, 141.91, 142.00, 142.28. [α]25D= (-) 100.6°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 275–277°C. Anal. Calcd for [C26H29NO2 HCl] C, H, N.

(S)-2-((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-ylamino)-1-phenylethanol (9b)

Amine 8 (0.1 g, 0.37 mmmol) was treated with (S)-2-phenyloxirane (45 mg, 0.37 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (5 mL) using procedure A. The residue was purified by column chromatography using 4% methanol in ethyl acetate to afford compound 9b (90 mg, 62%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.26–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.48–1.59 (m, 1H), 1.67 (tt, J = 4.0, 13.6 Hz, 1H), 1.92–1.99 (m, 1H), 2.65 (dd, J = 9.2, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (br s, 1H), 3.05 (dd, J = 3.2, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.48–3.52 (m, 1H), 3.96–4.06 (m, 4H), 4.78 (dd, J = 2.8, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.12–7.38 (m, 15H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.82, 26.47, 51.53, 54.37, 57.12, 70.12, 70.99, 79.30, 125.72, 126.23, 126.50, 127.51, 128.28, 128.37, 128.40, 128.47, 128.53, 141.92, 142.04, 142.09. [α]25D= (-) 40.6°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 215–217°C. Anal. Calcd for [C26H29NO2 HCl] C, H, N.

(R)-2-(((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)amino)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)ethanol (9c)

Amine 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was treated with (R)-2-(4-fluorophenyl)oxirane (35 mg, 0.25 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (3 mL) using procedure A. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 3% methanol in ethyl acetate as the eluent to afford compound 9c (51 mg, 59%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.20–1.56 (m, 2H), 1.56–1.76 (m, 1H), 1.86–2.04 (m, 1H), 2.62–2.72 (m, 1H), 2.75 (s, 1H), 2.84 (dd, J = 3.5, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.25–3.65 (m, 3H), 3.82–3.94 (m, 2H), 3.97–4.09 (m, 1H), 4.75 (dd, J = 3.5, 9.4 Hz, 1H), 6.90–7.05 (m, 2H), 7.06–7.36 (m, 12H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.8, 27.4, 51.0, 54.3, 57.2, 69.7, 71.2, 79.3, 114.9, 115.2, 126.2, 126.4, 127.3, 127.4, 128.3, 128.4, 138.1, 141.9, 142.0, 160.9, 163.3. [α]25D= (-) 54.6°, c = 1 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 260–265°C. Anal. Calcd for [C26H28NO2F HCl] C, H, N.

(S)-2-(((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)amino)-1-(4-fluorophenyl)ethanol (9d)

Amine 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was treated with (S)-2-(4-fluorophenyl)oxirane (35 mg, 0.25 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (3 mL) using procedure A. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 3% methanol in ethyl acetate as the eluent to afford compound 9d (48 mg, 56%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.17–1.38 (m, 2H), 1.56–1.76 (m, 1H), 1.96–2.08 (m, 1H), 2.75 (t from dd, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 2.88 (br s, 1H), 3.10 (dd, J = 2.3, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 1H), 4.02–4.12 (m, 3H), 4.95 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 5.63 (br s, 1H), 6.93–7.04 (m, 2H), 7.13–7.40 (m, 12H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.4, 25.4, 52.0, 54.1, 56.8, 69.2, 69.5, 69.6, 79.3, 115.1, 115.3, 126.2, 126.5, 127.3, 127.4, 128.2, 128.3, 128.4, 128.5, 136.9, 137.0, 141.8, 141.9, 160.9, 163.4. [α]25D= (-) 34.6°, c = 1 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 248–256°C. Anal. Calcd for [C26H28NO2F HCl 0.4 H2O] C, H, N.

(R)-2-(((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)amino)-1-(3-methoxyphenyl) ethanol (9e)

Amine 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was treated with (R)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)oxirane (38 mg, 0.25 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (3 mL) using procedure A. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using 3% methanol in ethyl acetate as the eluent to afford compound 9e (55 mg, 59%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.76–0.89 (m, 1H), 1.10–1.50 (m, 3H), 1.56–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.80–1.98 (m, 1 H), 2.63–2.73 (m, 2H), 2.82 (dd, J = 3.5, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.41 (br s, 2H), 3.56 (dd, J = 1.5, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 3.82–3.96 (m, 2H), 3.96–4.07 (m, 1H), 4.69 (dd, J = 3.5, 9.1 Hz, 1H), 6.73–6.80 (m, 1H), 6.84–6.91 (m, 2H), 7.07–7.32 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.7, 26.9, 51.3, 53.9, 55.1, 57.1, 68.9, 71.2, 79.3, 111.0, 113.2, 118.0, 126.2, 126.4, 128.2, 128.4, 129.3, 141.8, 143.6, 159.6. [α]25D= (-) 69.5°, c = 1 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 140–150°C. Anal. Calcd for [C27H31NO3 HCl 0.2 H2O] C, H, N.

(S)-2-(((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)amino)-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)ethanol (9f)

Compound 8 (0.18 g, 0.67 mmol) was treated with (S)-2-(3-methoxyphenyl)oxirane (0.1 g, 0.67 mmol) in anhydrous ethanol (10 mL) using procedure A. The residue was purified by column chromatography using 5% methanol in ethyl acetate to afford compound 9f (0.16 g, 57%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.24–1.34 (m, 2H), 1.42–1.56 (m, 1H), 1.65 (tt, J = 4.0, 13.2 Hz, 1H), 1.90–1.98 (m, 1H), 2.62 (dd, J = 9.6, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 2.71 (br s, 1H), 3.03 (dd, J = 3.2, 12.4 Hz, 1H), 3.48–3.54 (m, 1H), 3.80 (s, 3H), 3.94–4.08 (m, 3H), 4.72 (dd, J = 2.8, 9.2 Hz, 1H), 6.81 (dd, J = 2.4, 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.90–6.96 (m, 2H), 7.12–7.34 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.15, 26.92, 51.68, 54.60, 55.50, 57.46, 70.56, 71.37, 79.58, 111.25, 113.47, 118.29, 126.51, 126.77, 128.56, 128.66, 128.72, 128.81, 129.65, 142.32, 142.39, 144.14, 159.99. [α]25D = (-) 53.2°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 210–212°C. Anal. Calcd for [C27H31NO3 HCl] C, H, N.

Procedure B. (3S,6S)-6-benzhydryl-N-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (10a)

To a stirred solution of amine 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) and 2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde (21 μL, 0.22 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) was added glacial acetic acid (13 μL, 0.22 mmol). After stirring for 30 min, NaCNBH3 (28 mg, 0.44 mmol) was added portion wise followed by methanol (1 mL) and the mixture was stirred for overnight at rt. The reaction mixture was quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution at 0 °C and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 X 75 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with water, brine, dried over Na2SO4, and solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Crude product was purified by column chromatography using 3% methanol in dichloromethane to give compound 10a (45 mg, 56%) as thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.28–1.36 (m, 1H), 1.50–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.91–2.04 (m, 1H), 2.74 (s, 1H), 3.28 (br s, 1H), 3.58 (dd, J = 1.8, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.85–4.14 (m, 5H), 7.07–7.42 (m, 12H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.52 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.0, 27.2, 51.1, 52.1, 57.0, 70.1, 79.3, 121.9, 122.1, 126.1, 126.4, 128.2, 128.5, 136.5, 142.2, 142.3, 149.1, 159.3. [α]25D= (-) 65.0°, c = 1 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 220–230°C. Anal. Calcd for [C24H26N2O 2 HCl] C, H, N.

(3S,6S)-6-benzhydryl-N-(pyridin-3-ylmethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (10b)

Compound 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was reacted with 3-pyridinecarboxaldehyde (21 μL, 0.22 mmol), glacial acetic acid (13 μL, 0.22 mmol), and NaCNBH3 (28 mg, 0.44 mmol) ) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 3% methanol in dichloromethane to afford compound 10b (45 mg, 56%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.24–1.36 (m, 2H), 1.48–1.70 (m, 2H), 1.90–1.98 (m, 1H), 2.64 (br s, 1H), 3.56 (dd, J = 1.6, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.81 (br s, 2H), 3.94–4.10 (m, 3H), 7.10–7.38 (m, 11H), 7.72 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 8.50 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 8.54 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.35, 27.55, 48.26, 50.62, 57.50, 70.37, 79.53, 123.64, 126.52, 126.72, 128.56, 128.72, 128.75, 128.77, 136.11, 142.34, 142.57, 148.70, 149.92. [α]25D = (-) 77.2°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 258–260°C. Anal. Calcd for [C24H26N2O 2HCl] C, H, N.

(3S,6S)-6-benzhydryl-N-(pyridin-4-ylmethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (10c)

Compound 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was reacted with 4-pyridinecarboxaldehyde (21 μL, 0.22 mmol), glacial acetic acid (13 μL, 0.22 mmol), and NaCNBH3 (28 mg, 0.44 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 3% methanol in dichloromethane to afford compound 10c (46 mg, 58%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.35–1.43 (m, 1H), 1.46–1.60 (m, 1H), 1.72 (tt, J = 4.0, 13.4 Hz, 1H), 1.86–1.95 (m, 1H), 2.58 (s, 1H), 3.61 (dd, J = 1.2, 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.89–4.02 (m, 4H), 4.06–4.13 (m, 1H), 7.16–7.40 (m, 10H), 7.67 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 8.48 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.1, 27.5, 49.1, 50.9, 57.4, 70.2, 79.3, 124.9, 126.3, 126.5, 128.3, 128.4, 128.6, 128.5, 141.9, 142.1, 146.7, 157.6. [α]25D= (-) 69.5°, c = 1 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 224–230°C. Anal. Calcd for [C24H26N2O 1.8 HCl] C, H, N.

(3S,6S)-6-benzhydryl-N-(naphthalen-1-ylmethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (10d)

Compound 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was reacted with 1-naphthaldehyde (30 μL, 0.22 mmol), glacial acetic acid (13 μL, 0.22 mmol), and NaCNBH3 (28 mg, 0.44 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 3% methanol in dichloromethane to afford compound 10d (51 mg, 56 %) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.33–1.41 (m, 1H), 1.55–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.73 (tt, J = 4.0, 13.4 Hz, 1H), 1.99–2.08 (m, 1H), 3.63 (dd, J = 1.2, 11.6 Hz, 1H), 4.01 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 4.07–418 (m, 2H), 4.28 (dd, J = 13.1, 37.5 Hz, 2H), 7.17–7.35 (m, 8 H), 7.37–7.58 (m, 6 H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.3, 27.7, 48.4, 50.9, 57.2, 70.1, 79.3, 123.7, 125.4, 125.9, 126.0, 126.2, 126.4, 127.7, 128.3, 128.4, 128.5, 128.6, 131.8, 133.8, 135.8, 142.2, 142.4. [α]25D= (-) 69.5°, c = 1 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 140–150°C. Anal. Calcd for [C29H29NO HCl 0.4 H2O] C, H, N.

2-(((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-ylamino)methyl)phenol (10e)

Compound 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was reacted with 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde (24 μL, 0.22 mmol), glacial acetic acid (13 μL, 0.22 mmol), and NaCNBH3 (28 mg, 0.44 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 2% methanol in dichloromethane to afford compound 10e (65 mg, 77%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.34–1.52 (m, 2H), 1.68 (tt, J = 4.0, 13.6, 1H), 1.90–2.00 (m, 1H), 2.70 (br s, 1H), 3.54–3.60 (m, 1H), 3.90–3.96 (m, 2H), 4.00–4.12 (m, 3H), 6.78 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.14–7.38 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.48, 27.28, 49.61, 49.80, 57.89, 69.72, 79.69, 116.69, 119.20, 112.50, 126.63, 126.85, 128.58, 128.67, 128.86, 129.01, 142.21, 142.27, 158.72. [α]25D = (-) 86.2°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 315–317°C (decomposition). Anal. Calcd for [C25H27NO2 HCl 0.3 H2O] C, H, N.

3-((((3S,6S)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-yl)amino)methyl)phenol (10f)

Compound 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was reacted with 3-hydroxybenzaldehyde (24 μL, 0.22 mmol), glacial acetic acid (13 μL, 0.22 mmol), and Na(OAc)3BH (84 mg, 0.44 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 2% methanol in dichloromethane to afford compound 10f (64 mg, 76%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.29–1.39 (m, 1H), 1.44–1.58 (m, 1H), 1.68 (tt, J = 4.3, 13.7 Hz, 1H), 2.05–2.11 (m 1H), 2.82 (br s, 1H), 3.31–3.35 (m, 1H), 3.52 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (dd, J = 13.1, 29.9 Hz, 2H), 3.94 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 3.99–4.09 (m, 2H), 6.68 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.74 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (s, 1H), 7.09–7.31 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 24.5, 25.8, 49.2, 49.9, 56.9, 67.9, 79.4, 115.4, 115.7, 120.0, 126.3, 126.5, 128.2, 128.5, 129.8, 141.7, 141.8, 157.4. [α]25D= (-) 55.4°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 190–200°C. Anal. Calcd for [C25H27NO2 HCl 0.5 H2O] C, H, N.

(3S,6S)-6-benzhydryl-N-(thiophen-2-ylmethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (10g)

Compound 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was reacted with 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde (25 mg, 0.22 mmol), glacial acetic acid (13 μL, 0.22 mmol), and NaCNBH3 (18 mg, 0.29 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 3% methanol in dichloromethane to afford compound 10g (65 mg, 79%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.24–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.44–1.58 (m, 1H), 1.64 (tt, J = 4.0, 13.2 Hz, 1H), 1.86–1.94 (m, 1H), 2.69 (br s, 1H), 3.55 (dd, J = 2.0, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.92–4.08 (m, 6H), 6.88–6.91 (m, 1H), 6.92–6.95 (m, 1H), 7.14–7.36 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.51, 27.87, 45.85, 50.22, 57.60, 70.43, 79.56, 124.53, 124.75, 126.54, 126.74, 126.83, 128.63, 128.78, 128.82, 142.49, 142.68, 145.09. [α]25D = (-) 78.4°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 256–258°C. Anal. Calcd for [C23H25NOS HCl 0.1H2O] C, H, N.

(3S,6S)-6-benzhydryl-N-(furan-2-ylmethyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (10h)

Compound 8 (50 mg, 0.19 mmol) was reacted with furfural (18 mg, 0.19 mmol), glacial acetic acid (11 μL, 0.19 mmol), and NaCNBH3 (24 mg, 0.37 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using 45% ethyl acetate in hexanes to afford compound 10h (45 mg, 69%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.28–1.34 (m, 1H), 1.45–1.58 (m, 1H), 1.59–1.74 (m, 2H), 1.84–1.94 (m, 1H), 2.65 (br s, 1H), 3.55 (dd, J = 2.0, 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.77 (dd, J = 14.4, 22.8 Hz, 2H), 3.90–4.00 (m, 2H), 4.02–4.10 (m, 1H), 6.15 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (t, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H), 7.10–7.40 (m, 11H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.36, 27.82, 43.76, 50.50, 57.42, 70.30, 79.51, 106.96, 110.32, 126.47, 126.67, 128.55, 128.70, 128.72, 128.76, 141.98, 142.49, 142.65, 154.27. [α]25D = (-) 75.4°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 228–230°C. Anal. Calcd for [C23H25NO2 HCl 0.3H2O] C, H, N.

(3S,6S)-N-((1H-pyrrol-2-yl)methyl)-6-benzhydryltetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (10i)

Compound 8 (50 mg, 0.19 mmol) was reacted with pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde (18 mg, 0.19 mmol), glacial acetic acid (11 μL, 0.19 mmol), and NaCNBH3 (24 mg, 0.37 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude product was purified by column chromatography using 5% methanol in ethyl acetate to afford compound 10i (50 mg, 77%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.32–1.36 (m, 1H), 1.64–1.68 (m, 2H), 1.96–2.00 (m, 1H), 2.72 (br s, 1H), 3.46 (d, J = 12.4 Hz, 1H), 3.88–4.08 (m, 5H), 4.99 (br s, 1H), 6.07 (br s, 1H), 6.14 (br s, 1H), 6.77 (br s, 1H), 7.10–7.36 (m, 10H), 9.48 (br s, 1H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.11, 26.55, 43.13, 50.30, 57.43, 69.54, 79.63, 107.93, 108.22, 118.58, 126.48, 126.79, 127.41, 128.55, 128.67, 128.78, 128.83, 142.34, 142.49. [α]25D = (-) 77.8°, c = 0.5 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 234–236°C. Anal. Calcd for [C23H26N2O HCl 0.3H2O] C, H, N.

(3S,6S)-6-benzhydryl-N-(4-methoxybenzyl)tetrahydro-2H-pyran-3-amine (10j)

Compound 8 (60 mg, 0.22 mmol) was reacted with 4-methoxybenzaldehyde (31 mg, 0.22 mmol), glacial acetic acid (13 μL, 0.22 mmol), and NaCNBH3 (28 mg, 0.44 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (6 mL) using procedure B. The crude residue was purified by column chromatography using ethyl acetate to afford compound 10j (40 mg, 46%) as a thick syrup. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.28–1.36 (m, 1H), 1.50–1.70 (m, 2H), 1.81 (br s, 1H), 1.90–1.98 (m, 1H), 2.65 (br s, 1H), 3.57 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (dd, J = 12.8, 24.8 Hz, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.96–4.10 (m, 3H), 6.88 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.16–7.40 (m, 12H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 25.45, 27.84, 50.40, 50.46, 55.51, 57.45, 70.49, 79.49, 114.01, 126.46, 126.64, 128.52, 128.73, 128.75, 128.82, 129.43, 132.96, 142.48, 142.76, 158.82. [α]25D = (-) 67.3°, c = 1 in MeOH. The product was converted into the corresponding hydrochloride salt; mp: 136–138°C. Anal. Calcd for [C26H29NO2 HCl 0.3H2O] C, H, N.

In vitro experiments

Monoamine transport inhibition

The ability of test compounds to inhibit substrate uptake by rat monoamine transporters was monitored as described by us previously.28, 32 Briefly, uptake of [3H]dopamine by DAT was measured in rat striatum, and uptake of [3H]serotonin by SERT and [3H]norepinephrine by NET was monitored in rat cerebral cortex. At least five triplicate concentrations of each test compound were studied, spaced evenly around the IC50 value. The latter was estimated by nonlinear computer curve-fitting procedures and converted to Ki with the Cheng-Prusoff equation as we described previously.32

CNS receptor screening

Compound 10f was characterized in several CNS receptor binding assays to assess the selectivity and specific interactions of 10f with the monoamine transporters. The assays were carried out generously by the National Institute of Mental Health’s Psychoactive Drug Screening Program, Contract # NO1MH32004 (NIMH PDSP). The NIMH PDSP is Directed by Bryan L. Roth MD, PhD at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Project Officer Jamie Driscol at NIMH, Bethesda MD, USA (http://pdsp.med.unc.edu/).

Compound 10f was evaluated in primary binding assays targeting, among others, cloned human dopamine receptor subtypes, serotonin receptor subtypes, alpha-adrenergic receptors, and opioid receptors. The description of all receptors targeted and corresponding radioligand used, is provided in the Supporting Information Section. The default concentration for primary binding experiments was 10 μM. Compounds with inhibition > 50% in the primary assay were moved into the secondary assay with full concentration curves of the test compound in order to calculate the Ki value for inhibition. For experimental details please refer to the PDSP web site <http://pdsp.med.unc.edu/> and click on “Binding Assay” or “Functional Assay” on the menu bar (experimental details have been updated!).

In vivo experiments

Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–225 g) were purchased from Harlan. Animals were housed in a temperature and humidity controlled room with 12 h light /dark cycle. Food and water were accessible to animals freely through out the duration of study. All testing occurred during the light component. All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by Wayne State University animal investigation committee consistent with AALAC guidelines.

Effect of compound 10f in the rat forced swimming test as a measure of its antidepressant property

The subjects were male Swiss Sprague Dawley rats (Harlam Sprague Dawley Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA) weighing 200–225 g housed in cages for at least 1 week prior to testing. Animals were maintained in a temperature-controlled environment under a 12 h light-dark cycle. All subjects were naive and used only once.

Rats were transported to the testing room at least for 1 h prior to testing for acclimatization and adaptation purposes. Experimental sessions were conducted between 9 AM to 2 PM daily. Animals were assigned randomly and were placed individually in a glass cylinder (24.5 cm X 35.5 cm) filled with water at room temperature to a depth of 22 cm. All the test sessions were recorded by a video camera. The water was changed in the beginning of each session and the temperature was maintained constant at 24–25 °C. Rats were judged to be immobile if making minimum movement to barely keep afloat.

The procedure consisted of a pretest and a test session separated by 24 h. 30 During the pretest period, rats were placed in the swim chamber for 15 min. Followed by the initial swim exposure; rats were patted dry and were transferred to the individual cages. Drugs or vehicle were then administered (i.p.) 15 min after the initial swim exposure and were then transported to their home cages. On the following day the rats were brought back to the testing room at least 1 h before the beginning of test session. Rats were administered either drugs or vehicle 1 h before the swim test. Each rat underwent a 5 min swim session, which was videotaped and scored later. In the case of imipramine, pretreatment time was 30 min.

All drugs were prepared freshly on the test days. Compound 10f and imipramine were dissolved in 10% β-hydroxypropyl cyclodextrin solution. All drugs and vehicles were administered i.p. 10f was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg and the volume of injections was maintained at 2 mL/kg. Imipramine was administered at 15 mg/kg. All drugs and vehicles were administered 1 h prior to testing for FST. Imipramine was administered 30 min prior testing. An individual, blinded to the treatment, scored the videotapes for immobility. Immobility scores were analyzed by one way ANOVA test.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Institute of Mental Health/ The National Institute of Health MH084888 (AKD).

Abbreviations

DAT

Dopamine transporter

SERT

Serotonin transporter

NET

Norepinephrine transporters

TUI

Triple uptake inhibitor

SAR

Structure activity relationship

GBR 12909 dihydrochloride

(1-[2-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-[3-phenylpropyl] piperazine)

SSRI

selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

DNRI

dopamine norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor

NE

Norepinephrine

5-HT

Serotonin

FST

Forced swim test

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Spectral data for compound 6b and elemental analysis data for all final targets is available. This material is available free of charge via the internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Koretz D, Merikangas KR, Rush AJ, Walters EE, Wang PS. The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R) JAMA. 2003;289:3095–3105. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.23.3095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lopez AD, Murray CC. The global burden of disease, 1990–2020. Nat Med. 1998;4:1241–1243. doi: 10.1038/3218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dilsaver SC, Chen YW, Swann AC, Shoaib AM, Krajewski KJ. Suicidality in patients with pure and depressive mania. Am J Psychiatry. 1994;151:1312–1315. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.9.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Strakowski SM, McElroy SL, Keck PE, Jr, West SA. Suicidality among patients with mixed and manic bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:674–676. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.5.674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nemeroff CB. Psychopharmacology of affective disorders in the 21st century. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44:517–525. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00068-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Iversen L. Neurotransmitter transporters: fruitful targets for CNS drug discovery. Mol Psychiatry. 2000;5:357–362. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schloss P, Williams DC. The serotonin transporter: a primary target for antidepressant drugs. J Psychopharmacol. 1998;12:115–121. doi: 10.1177/026988119801200201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nierenberg AA, Amsterdam JD. Treatment-resistant depression: definition and treatment approaches. J Clin Psychiatry. 1990;51(Suppl):39–47. discussion 48–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nierenberg AA, Quitkin FM, Kremer C, Keller MB, Thase ME. Placebo-controlled continuation treatment with mirtazapine: acute pattern of response predicts relapse. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:1012–1018. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.D’Aquila PS, Collu M, Gessa GL, Serra G. The role of dopamine in the mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;405:365–373. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(00)00566-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Papakostas GI. Dopaminergic-based pharmacotherapies for depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;16:391–402. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Clayton AH, Warnock JK, Kornstein SG, Pinkerton R, Sheldon-Keller A, McGarvey EL. A placebo-controlled trial of bupropion SR as an antidote for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-induced sexual dysfunction. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:62–67. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Damsa C, Bumb A, Bianchi-Demicheli F, Vidailhet P, Sterck R, Andreoli A, Beyenburg S. “Dopamine-dependent” side effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a clinical review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65:1064–1068. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Skolnick P, Popik P, Janowsky A, Beer B, Lippa AS. Antidepressant-like actions of DOV 21,947: a “triple” reuptake inhibitor. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;461:99–104. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01310-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shaw AM, Boules M, Zhang Y, Williams K, Robinson J, Carlier PR, Richelson E. Antidepressant-like effects of novel triple reuptake inhibitors, PRC025 and PRC050. Eur J Pharmacol. 2007;555:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Skolnick P, Basile AS. Triple reuptake inhibitors (“broad spectrum” antidepressants) CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2007;6:141–149. doi: 10.2174/187152707780363285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liang Y, Shaw AM, Boules M, Briody S, Robinson J, Oliveros A, Blazar E, Williams K, Zhang Y, Carlier PR, Richelson E. Antidepressant-like pharmacological profile of a novel triple reuptake inhibitor, (1S,2S)-3-(methylamino)-2-(naphthalen-2-yl)-1-phenylpropan-1-ol (PRC200-SS) J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;327:573–583. doi: 10.1124/jpet.108.143610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Skolnick P, Krieter P, Tizzano J, Basile A, Popik P, Czobor P, Lippa A. Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of DOV 216,303, a “triple” reuptake inhibitor. CNS Drug Rev. 2006;12:123–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2006.00123.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dutta AK, Davis MC, Reith ME. Rational design and synthesis of novel 2,5-disubstituted cis- and trans-piperidine derivatives exhibiting differential activity for the dopamine transporter. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2001;11:2337–2340. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(01)00443-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dutta AK, Davis MC, Fei XS, Beardsley PM, Cook CD, Reith ME. Expansion of structure-activity studies of piperidine analogues of 1-[2-(diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine (GBR 12935) compounds by altering substitutions in the N-benzyl moiety and behavioral pharmacology of selected molecules. J Med Chem. 2002;45:654–662. doi: 10.1021/jm010316x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ghorai SK, Cook C, Davis M, Venkataraman SK, George C, Beardsley PM, Reith ME, Dutta AK. High affinity hydroxypiperidine analogues of 4-(2-benzhydryloxyethyl)-1-(4-fluorobenzyl)piperidine for the dopamine transporter: stereospecific interactions in vitro and in vivo. J Med Chem. 2003;46:1220–1228. doi: 10.1021/jm020275k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dutta AK, Zhang S, Kolhatkar R, Reith ME. Dopamine transporter as target for drug development of cocaine dependence medications. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;479:93–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.08.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang S, Reith ME, Dutta AK. Design, synthesis, and activity of novel cis- and trans-3,6-disubstituted pyran biomimetics of 3,6-disubstituted piperidine as potential ligands for the dopamine transporter. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:1591–1595. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(03)00169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kolhatkar R, Cook CD, Ghorai SK, Deschamps J, Beardsley PM, Reith ME, Dutta AK. Further structurally constrained analogues of cis-(6-benzhydrylpiperidin-3-yl)benzylamine with elucidation of bioactive conformation: discovery of 1,4-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane derivatives and evaluation of their biological properties for the monoamine transporters. J Med Chem. 2004;47:5101–5113. doi: 10.1021/jm049796t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang S, Zhen J, Reith ME, Dutta AK. Structural requirements for 2,4- and 3,6-disubstituted pyran biomimetics of cis-(6-benzhydryl-piperidin-3-yl)-benzylamine compounds to interact with monoamine transporters. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12:6301–6315. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.07.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang S, Zhen J, Reith ME, Dutta AK. Discovery of novel trisubstituted asymmetric derivatives of (2S,4R,5R)-2-benzhydryl-5-benzylaminotetrahydropyran-4-ol, exhibiting high affinity for serotonin and norepinephrine transporters in a stereospecific manner. J Med Chem. 2005;48:4962–4971. doi: 10.1021/jm049021k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang S, Fernandez F, Hazeldine S, Deschamps J, Zhen J, Reith ME, Dutta AK. Further structural exploration of trisubstituted asymmetric pyran derivatives (2S,4R,5R)-2-benzhydryl-5-benzylamino-tetrahydropyran-4-ol and their corresponding disubstituted (3S,6S) pyran derivatives: a proposed pharmacophore model for high-affinity interaction with the dopamine, serotonin, and norepinephrine transporters. J Med Chem. 2006;49:4239–4247. doi: 10.1021/jm0601699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dutta AK, Ghosh B, Biswas S, Reith ME. D-161, a novel pyran-based triple monoamine transporter blocker: behavioral pharmacological evidence for antidepressant-like action. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;589:73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lewis DB, Matecka D, Zhang Y, Hsin LW, Dersch CM, Stafford D, Glowa JR, Rothman RB, Rice KC. Oxygenated analogues of 1-[2-(Diphenylmethoxy)ethyl]- and 1-[2-[Bis(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazines (GBR 12935 and GBR 12909) as potential extended-action cocaine-abuse therapeutic agents. J Med Chem. 1999;42:5029–5042. doi: 10.1021/jm990291q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Porsolt RD, Le Pichon M, Jalfre M. Depression: a new animal model sensitive to antidepressant treatments. Nature. 1977;266:730–732. doi: 10.1038/266730a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cryan JF, Markou A, Lucki I. Assessing antidepressant activity in rodents: recent developments and future needs. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002;23:238–245. doi: 10.1016/s0165-6147(02)02017-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cheng Y, Prusoff WH. Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol. 1973;22:3099–3108. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES