Skip to main content
Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal logoLink to Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal
. 2007 Apr;7(1):31–34.

Prevalence and Correlates of Neural Tube Defect in South West Iran

Retrospective analysis

Ahmad Behrooz 1,*, Mohammad H Gorjizadeh 1
PMCID: PMC3086415  PMID: 21654942

Abstract

Objective:

In view of the large number of pregnancies complicated by neural tube defect (NTD) in Khuzestan, south west Iran, this study assesses the prevalence of NTD and its ecological and social factors.

Methods:

This is a retrospective study, based on medical documents using an analytic assessment of NTDs in pregnant women attending the Jundi Shapur University hospitals in Ahvaz from 21 March 2002 to 20 March 2004.

Results:

The total number of pregnant women was 13,262 and 56 pregnancies were complicated with NTD. A large number of the infants with NTDs were female (70%) and the most common anomaly was anencephaly. The prevalence was 4.2 in 1,000 births. The percentage in primigravida was 42.6% and in multigravida 57.4%. The main risk factor for NTD was age of the mother, those between 21 and 30 being the most affected. Consanguinity is the second risk factor with 31% of couples who were close relatives. Other socio-demographic factors were also significant.

Conclusion:

This retrospective study confirms clinical observation that pregnancies complicated by NTD in Khuzestan are common. There are various ecological and social factors that correlate with the prevalence of NTD.

Keywords: Neural tube defect, Social and ecological factors, retrospective study, Khuzestan, Iran,


Neural tube defects (NTDs) are among the most common defect of human congenital malformations, affecting 0.6 per 1,000 live births in the United States, where there are approximately 4,000 NTD complicated pregnancies annually.1 Spina bifida and anencephaly are the most commonly reported NTDs, which affect 4,000 pregnancies resulting in 2,500 to 3,000 births in the United States each year.2, 3 Although its etiology remains a mystery, remarkable advances have been made in the understanding and prevention of NTDs over the past few decades.

A number of risk factors are associated with NTDs. A previous pregnancy with an NTD has the strongest association, with a relative risk of 10. There are strong ethnic and geographical associations with NTDs.4

The most commonly cited causes for NTDs include a deficiency in folate concentrations.5, 6 Genetic susceptibility, environmental factors, in utero drug exposure, and/or abnormal metabolic pathways that lead to a failure of neural tube closure during fetal development has also been linked with NTDS.7, 8

In view of the large number of pregnancies complicated by NTDs in Khuzestan and because of the many risk factors, such as socioeconomic status, nutritional deficiency, ethnicity, consanguinity, multiparity, geography and mutagens like chemical bombing in this region, this study aims to explore retrospectively the rate and associate factors for NTDs in this particular region of Iran.

METHODS

The medical records of all pregnant women, including those with documented NTDs, who attended the Jundishapur University Hospitals, in Ahvaz, from 21 March 2002 till 20 March 2004, were reviewed.

Data regarding NTD variations, the gender of affected fetuses, maternal age, parity, any family relationship of the couple, previous affected pregnancies or wastage, and mother’s blood group and Rhesus factor (Rh) were looked for and recorded. Moreover, the results were also analytically assessed. Data were compared using Chi square test: ρ-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science /PC+ software (version 7). The study was approved by the Internal Review Board of the Obstetrics & Gynecology Department at Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences.

RESULTS

Among 13,262 medical records of live births, 56 women had fetuses or newborns with NTDs (4.2 per 1,000 births): anencephaly (n=30, 53.6%), spina bifida (n=15, 26.8%), meningocele (n=5, 8.9%), encephalocele (n=3, 5.4%), anencephaly plus meningo-myelocele (n=3, 5.4%).

As for the gender factor, among 56 pregnancies affected with NTD, 39 (70%) were female and 17 (30%) were male. This difference is statistically significant (p<0.05). Among the 56 women whose pregnancies were affected by NTDs, 7 (12.5%) were 10–20 years old, 39 (69.7%) 21–30 years, while 10 (17.8%) were 31–40 years old.

As far as the parity factor was concerned, among the mothers whose pregnancies were affected by NTDs, 24 (42.8%) women were primiparous and 32 (57.1%) were multiparous. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.07).

As for the family relationship of the couple, 31% of women with pregnancies affected by NTDs were related to their husbands. Fifty three (94.6%) of women had NTDs for the first time in pregnancy, whereas only 3 (5.4%) women had a history of NTDs in previous pregnancies. Among 56 women with pregnancies affected by NTDs, 10 (17.8%) had a history of one previous abortion and 6 (10.7%) had had more than one abortion. In terms of blood group and Rh compatibility, the blood group B was the most represented and the blood group AB was the least in women with NTD affected pregnancies. Most of the women were Rh positive.

A final correlate of NTDs that was explored in this study is climatic condition. The data suggest that there is a temporal relationship between the frequency of NTD and prevailing hot weather. The present study unequivocally suggests that NTD is highest during the two seasons of spring and autumn and thus among births in late winter and early spring.

DISCUSSION

NTDs are thought to have multifactor etiology with environmental and genetic susceptibility, maternal age, nutritional intake, exposure to drugs and harmful material, geographic region and socioeconomic status.9

In this study, we reviewed medical records of all pregnant women with documented NTDs, who attended our university hospitals between 21 March 2002 and 20 March 2004. Among 13,262 women, 56 fetuses had NTDs (4.2 per 1000 birth). This incidence is markedly higher (2 to 4 fold) than the prevalence reported elsewhere. Worldwide, prevalence of NTDs ranges from 1.4–2 per 1,000 live births.810

It is important to speculate on factors contributing to the high incidence of NTD in this population. It is possible that eight years of war (1980–1987) that affected this region may have led to the area being contaminated with mutagen substances. This issue would require more systematic study.

In our study, the defect with highest frequency was anencephaly with 22.6 per 10,000 births, followed by myelomeningocele (11.3 per 10,000 births), meningocele (3.8 per 10,000 births) and encephaloceles (2.3 per 10,000 births). The rate is significantly higher than previously published studies. For example, Hendricks11 in his study of a western population found a rate of anencephaly of 6.4 per per 10,000 births, spina bifida: 7.1 per 10,000 births, encephalocele: 1.1 per 10,000 births

In 1999, Leach et al12 reported 2.6 per 1,000 births, the prevalence of anencephaly in Poland. A study from Rosch et al. in 1999 reported 1.64 per 1000 births, the incidence of neural tube defects in Magdeburg, Germany.13 The incidence of NTDs in Oman is 1.25 per 1,000 births, according to study of Rajab et al.14

There is some evidence to suggest that the female gender may be associated with a higher risk for NTDs.15 Two-thirds of newborns affected with NTDs are female.16 In our study, 70% of new borns affected with NTDs were female.

The effect of maternal age on risk of NTDs is generally considered to be small. When an association can be found, risk tends to be elevated in older or very young mothers.17 In our study, most women with pregnancies affected by NTDs were 21 to 30 years old. Although women aged 21–30 had more pregnancies affected by NTDs, this seems to be due to a bias in our study, because the vast majority of the cases studied were in that age group.

The effect of maternal parity on the risk of NTD is probably stronger than maternal age. Studies have shown both a modest risk in mothers of parity three or more and an increased risk in primiparous mothers.18 We found no difference in occurrence rate of NTDs between primiparous and multiparous mothers (p=0.02).

Most cases are the first affected child in their families, although inheritance of this trait is influenced by familial predisposition, which is due to its threshold hereditary patterns.16 In our study, most of the malformed fetuses were the first affected individuals in their big families. In about 30% of cases, parents of the child affected by NTDs had first cousin relationships, so predisposition to these defects is increased. Indeed, there is no clear inheritance pattern in a single family and the presence of more affected cases in a family shows a higher susceptibility in that particular family.

Women with a previous history of NTD birth have a 10 times increased risk for another NTD birth. However, the majority (95%) of NTD pregnancies occur in women without a previous history of NTD births.19 Thus the prevention of the first occurrence is of real public health importance.20

The frequency of NTD is the highest during the two seasons of spring and autumn,15 so the defects are mostly seen in individuals born late in winter and early in the spring.6 In our study, the season in which NTDs prevalence is highest was spring. With respect to neural tube development in the first trimester, in our analysis most affected fetuses born occurred with mothers who became pregnant early in the summer. Obviously, the environmental temperature during summer in Khuzestan is 50 degrees centigrade, which could affect the prevalence of NTDs. As in the study made by Rajab and colleagues in the Royal Hospital of Oman in 1999, an environmental temperature of more than 48 degree centigrade was suggested to be risk factor in development of neural tube defects.14 This corroborates an animal study experiment, where pregnant mice, when exposed to high temperatures, had a high rate of NTDs.21

CONCLUSION

Because of the high incidence of NTDs and especially anencephaly in Khuzestan, it is recommended to institute a nationwide educational programme and to establish public health guidelines for the prevention of neural tube defects. Over the last few decades, there has clearly been a substantial body of literature that supports the association of maternal use of multivitamins containing folic acid in early pregnancy and a reduced risk for offspring with neural tube defects. The rationale for the folate deficiency hypothesis is that prenatal supplementation with antioxidant vitamins containing folic acid decreases the incidence of birth defects, especially neural tube defects. Other preventative measures ought to be systematically explored.

Acknowledgments

We express our appreciation to Mrs. Raana Ghomi Maibodi for her assistance in data collection.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Nakano KK. Anencephaly: A review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1973;15:383–400. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mulinare J, Erickson D. Prevention of neural tube defects. Teratology. 1997;56:17–18. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199707/08)56:1/2<17::AID-TERA5>3.0.CO;2-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Honein MA, Paulozzi LJ, Mathews TJ, Erickson JD, Wong LY. Impact of folic acid fortification of the US food supply on the occurrence of neural tube defects. JAMA. 2001;285:2981–2986. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.23.2981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Harris JA, Shaw GM. Neural tube defects—why are rates high among population of Mexican descent? Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103:163–164. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103s6163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maclone TG. Central nervous system. In: Sadler TW, editor. Langman’s Medical Embryology. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 1996. pp. 385–390. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Thomas MA. Some malformations and diseases determined by multifactorial inheritance. In: Nora JJ, Fraser FC, editors. Medical Genetics Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1989. pp. 240–243. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lorber J. Malformation of neural tube closure. In: Larsen WJ, editor. Human Embryology. Churchill Livingstone; 1997. pp. 22–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haslem MA. Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system. In: Behrman RE, editor. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. WB Saunders; 2000. pp. 1803–1806. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duncan S, Merco S, Lopez Cendes I. Repeated Neural tube defects and valperate monotherapy suggest a pharmacogenetic abnormality. Epilepsia. 2001;42:750–753. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.44300.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Thompson MW, McInnes RR, Huntington WF. Prenatal diagnosis and fetal therapy. In: Cunningham FG, Gunt NF, Leveno KJ, Gill Strup LC, Hauth JC, Wenstrom KD, editors. Williams Obstetrics. 21st ed. McGraw-Hill; 2001. pp. 956–960. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hendricks KA. Neural tube defects along the Texas Mexico border; 1993–1995. Am J Epidemiology. 1999;149:1119–1127. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lech M. Prevention using folic Acid, a good method for reduction of neural tube defects in Poland. Przegl-Lek. 1999;55:334–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rosch C. Incidence of neural tube defects in the Magdeburg administrative district. Gesundheitswesen. 1998;60:563–566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rajab A. Neural tube defects and congenital hydrocephalus in the Sultanate of Oman. J Trop Pediatr. 1998;44:300–303. doi: 10.1093/tropej/44.5.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Haslam RH. Prenatal Diagnosis. In: Singer SAM, editor. Human genetics. WH Freeman; 1985. pp. 122–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gilman S. Genetics disorders with multifactorial inheritance. In: Thompson MH, McInnes R, Willard H, editors. Genetics in Medicine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1991. pp. 349–357. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Frey L, Allen Hauser W. Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Epilepsia. 2003;44(supp 3):4–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s3.2.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Elwood JM, Little J, Elwood JH. Fetal Loss. In: Elwood JM, Little J, Elwood JH, editors. Epidemiology and control of neural tube defects Vol 20 Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. pp. 324–334. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Geisel J. Folic acid and neural tube defects in pregnancy. J Perinat & Neonat Nurs. 2003;17:268–279. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200310000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Birnbacher R, Messerschmidt AM, Pollak AP. Diagnosis and prevention of neural tube defects. Curr Opin Urol. 2002;12:461–464. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200211000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shin JH, Shiota K. Folic acid supplementation of pregnant mice suppresses heat-induced neural tube defects in the offspring. J Nutr. 1999;129:2070–2073. doi: 10.1093/jn/129.11.2070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of Sultan Qaboos University

RESOURCES