Phycocyanin and phycoerythrin from P. yezoensis Ueda were prepared using co-precipitation with ammonium sulfate and hydroxyapatite column chromatography with improved purity and yield. The preliminary X-ray analysis clarified the ambiguity in the unit-cell contents resulting from the Matthews coefficient calculation and the final model showed that phycocyanin is present as two α6β6 heterododecamers in the asymmetric unit associated by an NCS twofold axis.
Keywords: phycobiliproteins, phycoerythrin, phycocyanin
Abstract
Porphyra yezoensis is one of the most important and widely cultured seaweeds in China. Phycobiliproteins exhibit excellent spectroscopic properties and play versatile roles in the biomedical, food, cosmetics and chemical synthetic dye industries. Here, the purification and crystallization of phycoerythrin and phycocyanin, two phycobiliproteins extracted from P. yezoensis, are described. Using a novel protocol including co-precipitation with ammonium sulfate and hydroxyapatite column chromatography, both phycobiliproteins were produced on a large scale with improved quality and yield compared with those previously reported. Native PAGE analysis indicated that phycoerythrin and phycocyanin exist as (αβ)3 heterohexamers in solution. The crystals of phycoerythrin diffracted to 2.07 Å resolution and belonged to space group R3. The unit-cell parameters referred to hexagonal axes are a = b = 187.7, c = 59.7 Å, with nine (αβ)2 heterotetramers per unit cell. The crystals of phycocyanin diffracted to 2.70 Å resolution in space group P21. Matthews coefficient analysis shows that 10–19 (αβ) heterodimers of phycocyanin in the asymmetric unit would be reasonable. A self-rotation function calculation clarified this ambiguity and indicated that 12 (αβ) heterodimers of phycocyanin are assembled in the asymmetric unit.
1. Introduction
Phycobiliproteins (PBPs), ubiquitously found in cyanobacteria and eukaryotic algae, are water-soluble proteins that have extraordinary fluorescence properties (Liu, Chen, Zhang & Zhou, 2005 ▶). Based on their absorption properties and chromophore groups, they are divided into four classes: phycoerythrins (PEs), phycocyanins (PCs), allophycocyanins (APCs) and phycoerythrocyanins (PECs) (Sekar & Chandramohan, 2008 ▶). PBPs not only participate in efficient energy capture and transfer (Betz, 1997 ▶; Arnold & Oppenheimer, 1950 ▶; French & Young, 1952 ▶), but also play an important role in nitrogen harvesting (Heathcote et al., 1992 ▶). PBPs can be used as natural colourants in food and cosmetics to substitute for synthetic pigments (Naidu et al., 1999 ▶; Bermejo et al., 2003 ▶), as fluorescence probes in clinical and immunological analysis (Kronick & Grossman, 1983 ▶; Sekar & Chandramohan, 2008 ▶) and as therapeutic reagents (Sekar & Chandramohan, 2008 ▶) with antioxidant (Benedetti et al., 2004 ▶), antitumour (Cai et al., 1995 ▶), hepatoprotective (Nagaoka et al., 2005 ▶), anti-inflammatory and antihyperalgesic (Shih et al., 2009 ▶) activities. Recent studies have indicated that PBPs may have potential applications in memory enhancement and artificial neuron networks etc. (Burrows et al., 2009 ▶; Womick & Moran, 2009 ▶).
The general process for PBP extraction consists of three steps: cell disruption, primary isolation and column chromatographic purification (Sun et al., 2009 ▶). However, the product quality and yield were found to vary when using materials from different origins even if routine procedures were carried out (Padgett & Krogmann, 1987 ▶; Wang, 2002 ▶; Wang et al., 2002 ▶; Sekar & Chandramohan, 2008 ▶; Ranjitha & Kaushik, 2005 ▶). For example, hydrophobic chromatography, which is effective for the purification of PBPs from Gracilaria verrucosa, Palmaria palmate and Porphyra haitanensis, proved to be unsuitable for those from Porphyra yezoensis (Niu et al., 2010 ▶). Since the first structure of PC was reported in 1991 (Duerring et al., 1991 ▶), structures of various PBPs from different algae have been deposited in the PDB. PBPs are primarily composed of α- and β-polypeptides and readily assembly into a disc shape bearing covalently attached open-chain tetrapyrroles known as phycobilins (Liu, Chen, Zhang & Zhou, 2005 ▶).
P. yezoensis is one of the major cultural seaweeds in China. In this study, we carried out a large-scale preparation of PBPs from P. yezoensis with high purity and implemented preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies of the PBPs that were obtained. The purification protocol developed in this paper will pave the way for the utilization of P. yezoensis.
2. Materials and methods
P. yezoensis seaweed was collected from an area of sea in Lvsi, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China. The algae were washed with fresh water and then stored at 253 K for future use. Hydroxyapatite was prepared and pre-equilibrated according to Siegelman & Kycia (1978 ▶).
All reagents used for purification were purchased from Sinopharm. Reagents for crystallization optimization were supplied by Sigma–Aldrich.
2.1. Protein purification
2 kg of P. yezoensis was crushed in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.8 using a 4 l homogenizer (Waring Co., USA). A cell-free extract was prepared by centrifugation (Supra centrifuge, Hanil Science Corporation, Incheon, Republic of Korea) at 10 000g for 20 min. The supernatants were stepwise co-precipitated with ammonium sulfate at different concentrations (20, 50, 10 and 40%) to remove impurities. The final precipitant was then dissolved in 50 mM phosphate buffer, desalted with Sephadex G-25 (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA) and further purified on a home-made hydroxyapatite (HAP) column by gradient elution using a series of phosphate buffers (pH 6.8) with different concentrations. The eluates containing PE and PC were collected. The whole procedure was monitored by protein absorption using an Ultrospec 2000 spectrophotometer (Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, USA). Finally, PE was desalted again and repurified with pre-equilibrated HAP followed by native PAGE analysis using EPS601 electrophoresis equipment (Amersham Biosciences Corporation, Corston, England).
2.2. Spectroscopic assay
It is known that the absorption at 280 nm corresponds to the total protein in the solution and that the absorbances at 565 and 615 nm correspond to the concentrations of PE and PC, respectively (Liu, Chen, Zhang, Zhang et al., 2005 ▶). Therefore, the purity of PE and PC can be monitored by the A 565/A 280 and A 615/A 280 ratios, respectively.
2.3. Crystallization
Initial crystallization trials were performed using the sitting-drop vapour-diffusion method at 293 and 277 K with commercially available kits from Hampton Research, Emerald BioSystems, Qiagen and XtalQuest. PE and PC crystallized in drops produced by mixing 1 µl 2 mg ml−1 protein in PBS buffer (1 mM phosphate buffer pH 6.8) and 1 µl reservoir solution. Initial crystals of PE and PC were detected in condition No. 29 of the PEGs II Suite (Qiagen) and condition C5 of Wizard III (Emerald BioSystems), respectively. After fine-tuning the crystallization conditions, PC crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were grown from a reservoir solution consisting of 0.2 M ammonium chloride and 20%(w/v) PEG 3350 at 293 K (Fig. 1 ▶ a). The PE crystals used for data collection were grown under the conditions 0.1 M HEPES pH 7.5, 0.1 M sodium acetate, 15% PEG 4000 at 277 K (Fig. 1 ▶ b). The crystals of both proteins usually appreared within 1 d and grew to full size in 4–5 weeks.
Figure 1.
Crystals of PC (a) and PE (b). The maximum dimensions of the PC crystals are about 0.12 × 0.04 × 0.01 mm and those of the PE crystals are about 0.08 × 0.02 × 0.02 mm.
2.4. Data collection
All crystals were mounted in nylon loops and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen prior to data collection on beamline BL17U at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF; People’s Republic of China). The cryoprotectant for the PC crystals consisted of 0.14 M ammonium chloride, 17.5% PEG 3350 and 30% ethylene glycol, while the PE crystals were cryoprotected with Paratone-N oil (Hampton Research). The data were indexed, integrated and scaled using HKL-2000 (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997 ▶). The data statistics for PE and PC are listed in Table 1 ▶.
Table 1. Data collection and statistics.
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
| PE | PC | |
|---|---|---|
| Beamline | SSRF BL17U | SSRF BL17U |
| Wavelength (Å) | 0.9793 | 0.9788 |
| Detector | MAR 225 CCD | MAR 225 CCD |
| No. of crystals | 1 | 1 |
| Distance to detector (mm) | 220 | 220 |
| Oscillation range per frame (°) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Total No. of images | 360 | 360 |
| Exposure time (s) | 2 | 2 |
| Temperature (K) | 100 | 100 |
| Resolution (Å) | 50.00–2.07 (2.14–2.07) | 50.00–2.70 (2.80–2.70) |
| Mosaicity (°) | 0.18–0.33 | 0.42–0.77 |
| Space group | R3 (hexagonal indexing) | P21 |
| Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) | a = 187.7, b = 187.7, c = 59.7 | a = 103.2, b = 123.0, c = 184.2, β = 89.3 |
| Volume of unit cell (Å3) | 1821465 | 2305213 |
| No. of (αβ) heterodimers per asymmetric unit | 2 | 12 |
| Matthews coefficient (Å3 Da−1) | 2.8 | 2.7 |
| Data completeness (%) | 99.7 (97.4) | 100.0 (100.0) |
| Rmerge† (%) | 14.4 (72.7) | 12.7 (76.7) |
| 〈I/σ(I)〉 | 12.2 (1.7) | 14.4 (2.7) |
| Multiplicity | 5.5 (3.7) | 6.4 (6.4) |
| No. of reflections collected | 261871 | 806597 |
| No. of unique reflections | 47618 (4645) | 126698 (12653) |
R
merge =
, where I
i(hkl) is the ith measurement of the intensity of reflection hkl and 〈I(hkl)〉 is the mean intensity of reflection hkl.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Preparation of PBPs from P. yezoensis
A crude fraction containing approximately 17.26 g PE and 10.81 g PC was obtained from homogenization of 2 kg P. yezoensis. After a four-step co-precipitation with ammonium sulfate, the purities of the two target proteins, indicated by the A 565/A 280 and A 615/A 280 ratios, kept increasing and finally reached 1.67 and 0.82, corresponding to 13.89 and 8.77 g PE and PC, respectively. The purity was improved remarkably using HAP chromatography, with yields of 0.184% and 0.057% (Fig. 2 ▶). Moreover, higher purity was easily achieved when HAP chromatography was implemented again. For example, the purity of PE was above 4.5 with a yield of 0.109% when the purification procedure using HAP chromatography was repeated. According to native PAGE analysis, the purified PE and PC existed homogeneously in solution with an approximate molecular weight of ∼120 kDa, coresponding to an (αβ)3 heterohexamer (Fig. 3 ▶).
Figure 2.
Yield and purity analysis of PE (a) and PC (b) during the purification steps. Lanes 1–4, co-precipitation with ammonium sulfate at concentrations of 20, 50, 10 and 40% sequentially; lane 5, eluate after the first HAP chromatography; lane 6, eluate after the second HAP chromatography. The bars represent the yield of the target protein after every purification step. The elates after HAP chromatography were carefully collected in different purity grades. The numbers on the bars indicate the corresponding purity of PE and PC as monitored by the A 565/A 280 and A 615/A 280 ratios, respectively.
Figure 3.
Native PAGE and spectral analysis of PE and PC. (a) Native PAGE analysis on a 5% separating and stacking gel. The results shown indicate that PC and PE exist as heterohexamers in solution. Lane M contains molecular-weight markers (labelled in kDa). (b) and (c) show the characteristic absorption of PE and PC from P. yezoensis after purification by HAP chromatography.
Although the extraction and purification of PBPs has been extensively studied (Padgett & Krogmann, 1987 ▶; Wang, 2002 ▶; Wang et al., 2002 ▶; Niu et al., 2007 ▶), the procedures used for other species of algae did not work well when applied to proteins from P. yezoensis. The most recent protocol involved the application of hydrophobic chromatography. For example, 28 g P. yezoensis was homogenized and applied onto a phenyl Sepharose column to obtain 27 mg PE with a purity of 2.0–2.5 (yield of 0.096%), followed by purification on a DEAE-Sepharose column to reach a purity of 4.5 with a yield of 0.082% (Niu et al., 2010 ▶). The improved approach described in this paper yielded PBPs in higher quality and quantity, which greatly decreased the purification time and cost.
3.2. Self-rotation function analysis
The crystals of PE belonged to the primary rhombohedral space group R3, with unit-cell parameters (in the equivalent hexagonal setting) a = b = 187.7, c = 59.7 Å. Matthews coefficient analysis (Matthews et al., 1968 ▶; Kantardjieff & Rupp, 2003 ▶) suggested that there are two (αβ) heterodimers in the asymmetric unit (V M = 2.81 Å3 Da−1), corresponding to a solvent content of 56%. A self-rotation function was calculated using MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010 ▶) from the CCP4 suite (Winn et al., 2011 ▶), which clearly showed noncrystallographic symmetry (NCS). The peaks in the χ = 180° section (Fig. 4 ▶ a) indicate the NCS twofold axes, which are regularly repeated owing to the crystallographic threefold symmetry. A unique NCS twofold axis exists in the xy plane at 55° from the x axis, which is perpendicular to the crystallographic threefold symmetry axis shown in the χ = 120° section. A preliminary attempt to solve the structure was carried out using molecular replacement with the Phaser program (McCoy et al., 2007 ▶) and the search model was composed of chains A and B from the published structure of PE from Gracilaria chilensis (PDB entry 1eyx; Contreras-Martel et al., 2001 ▶). An unambiguous solution was obtained and rigid-body refinement was subsequently performed using REFMAC (Murshudov et al., 2011 ▶) with a final R factor of 0.30 and R free of 0.28.
Figure 4.
Self-rotation functions of PE (a) and PC (b). The maps were calculated using the program MOLREP. The maps of PE and PC are shown with polar angles of χ = 120° (right) and 180° (left).
The crystals of PC belonged to space group P21 and the Matthews coefficient (Matthews et al., 1968 ▶; Kantardjieff & Rupp, 2003 ▶) suggested that 10–19 (αβ) heterodimers in an asymmetric unit would give a reasonable V M (1.73–3.28 Å3 Da−1). Therefore, a self-rotation function was calculated as described above. The results are shown in Fig. 4 ▶(b). The two peaks at ϕ = ±90° and ψ = 90° in the χ = 180° section represent a crystallographic twofold symmetry axis. The presence of strong peaks in the χ = 120° section indicate that there is an NCS threefold axis which is superimposed with the crystallographic twofold axis. The peak with ϕ = 0, ψ = 0, χ = 180° represents a unique NCS twofold axis perpendicular to the crystallographic twofold axis and the NCS threefold axis and their combination generates a set of six peaks with ϕ = 0° and χ = 180°. The crystallographic twofold axis combines with the twofold and threefold NCS axes to give 12 (αβ) heterodimers in the asymmetric unit.
Initial attempts to solve the PC structure by molecular replacement implemented in Phaser (McCoy et al., 2007 ▶), MOLREP (Vagin & Teplyakov, 2010 ▶) and AMoRe (Navaza, 1994 ▶) within the CCP4 suite (Winn et al., 2011 ▶) using any of the known αβ heterodimers (PDB entry 2bv8 chain A and chain B; Contreras-Martel et al., 2007 ▶), α2β2 heterotetramers (PDB entry 1eyx; Contreras-Martel et al., 2001 ▶) or α6β6 heterododecamers (PDB entry 2bv8; Contreras-Martel et al., 2007 ▶) as the search model did not succeed. A successful solution was obtained using the automatic molecular-replacement program BALBES (Long et al., 2008 ▶; Fig. 5 ▶ a). The resulting model was composed of two toroids with different numbers of subunits: one was an α6β6 heterododecamer and the other was an α4β4 heterooctamer. Furthermore, we found sufficient positive density near the α4β4 heterooctamer to accommodate the missing α2β2 part. Therefore, the structure of the heterododecamer was transformed onto the heterooctamer according to the NCS twofold axis and the missing subunits of the latter were easily patched. Finally, the whole model contained two α6β6 heterododecamer toroids associated by an NCS twofold axis (Fig. 5 ▶ b), which agrees with the solution from the self-rotation function. The assembly of PC described above corresponds to a V M of 2.73 Å3 Da−1 with a solvent content of 55% based on Matthews coefficient calculations (Matthews et al., 1968 ▶; Kantardjieff & Rupp, 2003 ▶).
Figure 5.
Presentation of the partial model of PC (a) automatically built using BALBES (Long et al., 2008 ▶) and the complete model of PC (b). The model of PC was composed of two toroids containing one heterododecamer per toroid.
Acknowledgments
We thank the staff members of beamline BL17U at Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) for their help with data collection. We appreciate Professor ZongXiang Xia’s critical comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the State 863 Program (grant No. 2007AA09Z406), the Key Laboratory of Exploration and Utilization of Aquatic Genetic Resources, Ministry of Education (KFT2008-12), Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist (08XD14037), Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (08540702600), the Shanghai Education Committee of China (Preponderant Subject Program No. S30701) and the National Nature Science Fundation of China (NSFC 31000329).
References
- Arnold, W. & Oppenheimer, J. R. (1950). J. Gen. Physiol. 33, 423–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Benedetti, S., Benvenuti, F., Pagliarani, S., Francogli, S., Scoglio, S. & Canestrari, F. (2004). Life Sci. 75, 2353–2362. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Bermejo, R., Tobaruela, D. J., Talavera, E. M., Orte, A. & Alvarez-Pez, J. M. (2003). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 263, 616–624. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Betz, M. (1997). Biol. Chem. 378, 167–176. [PubMed]
- Burrows, S. M., Patel, P. & Pappas, D. (2009). Appl. Spectrosc. 63, 709–715. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Cai, X., Zheng, S., Liming, H. et al. (1995). Chin. J. Mar. Drugs, 12, 2.
- Contreras-Martel, C., Martinez-Oyanedel, J., Bunster, M., Legrand, P., Piras, C., Vernede, X. & Fontecilla-Camps, J.-C. (2001). Acta Cryst. D57, 52–60. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Contreras-Martel, C., Matamala, A., Bruna, C., Poo-Caamaño, G., Almonacid, D., Figueroa, M., Martínez-Oyanedel, J. & Bunster, M. (2007). Biophys. Chem. 125, 388–396. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Duerring, M., Schmidt, G. B. & Huber, R. (1991). J. Mol. Biol. 217, 577–592. [DOI] [PubMed]
- French, C. S. & Young, V. K. (1952). J. Gen. Physiol. 35, 873–890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Heathcote, P., Wyman, M., Carr, N. G. & Beddard, G. S. (1992). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1099, 267–270.
- Kantardjieff, K. A. & Rupp, B. (2003). Protein Sci. 12, 1865–1871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Kronick, M. N. & Grossman, P. D. (1983). Clin. Chem. 29, 1582–1586. [PubMed]
- Liu, L.-N., Chen, X.-L., Zhang, X.-Y., Zhang, Y.-Z. & Zhou, B.-C. (2005). J. Biotechnol. 116, 91–100. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Liu, L.-N., Chen, X.-L., Zhang, Y.-Z. & Zhou, B.-C. (2005). Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1708, 133–142. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Long, F., Vagin, A. A., Young, P. & Murshudov, G. N. (2008). Acta Cryst. D64, 125–132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Matthews, B. W., Cohen, G. H., Silverton, E. W., Braxton, H. & Davies, D. R. (1968). J. Mol. Biol. 36, 179–183. [DOI] [PubMed]
- McCoy, A. J., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Adams, P. D., Winn, M. D., Storoni, L. C. & Read, R. J. (2007). J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Murshudov, G. N., Skubák, P., Lebedev, A. A., Pannu, N. S., Steiner, R. A., Nicholls, R. A., Winn, M. D., Long, F. & Vagin, A. A. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 355–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Nagaoka, S., Shimizu, K., Kaneko, H., Shibayama, F., Morikawa, K., Kanamaru, Y., Otsuka, A., Hirahashi, T. & Kato, T. (2005). J. Nutr. 135, 2425–2430. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Naidu, K. A., Sarada, R., Manoj, G., Khan, M. Y., Swamy, M. M., Viswanatha, S., Murthy, K. N., Ravishankar, G. A. & Srinivas, L. (1999). Food Biotechnol. 13, 51–66.
- Navaza, J. (1994). Acta Cryst. A50, 157–163.
- Niu, J.-F., Chen, Z. F., Wang, G. C. & Zhou, B.-C. (2010). J. Appl. Phycol. 22, 25–31.
- Niu, J.-F., Wang, G.-C., Zhou, B.-C., Lin, X.-Z. & Chen, C.-S. (2007). J. Phycol. 43, 1339–1347.
- Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Padgett, M. P. & Krogmann, D. W. (1987). Photosynth. Res. 11, 225–235. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Ranjitha, K. & Kaushik, B. D. (2005). J. Sci. Ind. Res. 64, 372–375.
- Sekar, S. & Chandramohan, M. (2008). J. Appl. Phycol. 20, 113–136.
- Shih, C.-M., Cheng, S.-N., Wong, C.-S., Kuo, Y.-L. & Chou, T.-C. (2009). Anesth. Analg. 108, 1303–1310. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Siegelman, H. & Kycia, J. (1978). Handbook of Phycological Methods, edited by J. A. Hellebust & J. S. Craigie, pp. 71–80. Cambridge University Press.
- Sun, L., Wang, S., Gong, X., Zhao, M., Fu, X. & Wang, L. (2009). Protein Expr. Purif. 64, 146–154. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Vagin, A. & Teplyakov, A. (2010). Acta Cryst. D66, 22–25. [DOI] [PubMed]
- Wang, G. C. (2002). Chromatographia, 56, 509–513.
- Wang, G. C., Sun, H. B., Fan, X. & Tseng, C. K. (2002). Acta Bot. Sin. 44, 541–546.
- Winn, M. D. et al. (2011). Acta Cryst. D67, 235–242.
- Womick, J. M. & Moran, A. M. (2009). J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 15771–15782. [DOI] [PubMed]





