Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Apr 22;67(Pt 5):o1193. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811014449

(2E)-2-[2-(Cyclo­hexyl­carbamothio­yl)hydrazinylidene]­propanoic acid

Md Abu Affan a,‡, Md Abdus Salam a, Fasihuddin B Ahmad a, Seik Weng Ng b, Edward R T Tiekink b,*
PMCID: PMC3089072  PMID: 21754495

Abstract

In the title thio­urea derivative, C10H17N3O2S, the carboxyl group and the least-squares plane through the cyclo­hexyl ring are twisted out of the plane through the central CN3S residue; the respective dihedral angles are 7.18 (8) and 62.29 (4)°. The conformation about the azomethine bond [1.275 (2) Å] is E. The NH groups are anti, with one forming an intra­molecular N—H⋯N hydrogen bond. The main feature of the crystal structure is the formation of linear supra­molecular chains along [110] mediated by alternating pairs of O—H⋯O and pairs of N—H⋯S hydrogen bonds.

Related literature

For related thio­urea structures, see: Normaya et al. (2011 ▶); Salam et al. (2011 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-o1193-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C10H17N3O2S

  • M r = 243.33

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 8.9204 (2) Å

  • b = 6.0350 (2) Å

  • c = 22.4750 (6) Å

  • β = 90.051 (3)°

  • V = 1209.93 (6) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.26 mm−1

  • T = 100 K

  • 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

  • Agilent Supernova Dual diffractometer with an Atlas detector

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010 ▶) T min = 0.687, T max = 1.000

  • 7394 measured reflections

  • 2723 independent reflections

  • 2251 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.036

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.041

  • wR(F 2) = 0.143

  • S = 0.98

  • 2723 reflections

  • 158 parameters

  • 3 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3

Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Agilent, 2010 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶) and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014449/hb5851sup1.cif

e-67-o1193-sup1.cif (17.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014449/hb5851Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1193-Isup2.hkl (133.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
N3—H3⋯N1 0.87 (1) 2.20 (2) 2.574 (2) 106 (2)
O1—H1⋯O2i 0.85 (1) 1.80 (1) 2.6416 (17) 172 (3)
N2—H2⋯S1ii 0.89 (1) 2.65 (1) 3.5384 (15) 176 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported financially by the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) under a research grant (No. 06-01-09-SF0046). The authors thank Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS) for the facilities to carry out the research work. The authors also thank the University of Malaya for support of the crystallographic facility.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In continuation of structural investigations into conformation and hydrogen bonding in thiourea derivatives (Normaya et al. 2011; Salam et al., 2011), the title compound, (I), was investigated.

The central CN3S chromophore in (I), Fig. 1, is planar (r.m.s. = 0.0039 Å). The carboxylate residue is slightly twisted out this plane (dihedral angle = 7.18 (8) °), and, by contrast, the least-squares plane through the cyclohexyl group (which has the conformation of a chair) is twisted significantly out of the central plane (dihedral angle = 62.29 (4) °). The H atoms of the NH groups are anti, and the conformation about the azomethine bond [1.275 (2) Å] is E. The N3—H forms an intramolecular hydrogen bond with the imino-N3 atom, Table 1. Finally, the thione and carboxylic acid groups lie to opposite sides of the molecule. This arrangements enables the formation of linear supramolecular chains via hydrogen bonds along [110] in the crystal packing, Fig. 2 and Table 1. The carboxylic acid residues self-associate via a centrosymmetric eight-membered {···HOC═O}2 synthon. Similarly, the thiourea entity with the NH atom not involved in the intramolecular N—H···N interaction, self-associates via a centrosymmetric eight-membered {···HNC═ S}2 synthon. Chains lie in the ab plane with the cyclohexyl rings inter-digitating along the c axis, Fig. 3.

Experimental

Cyclohexylisothiocyanate (0.706 g, 5 mmol) and hydrazine hydrate (0.250 g, 5 mmol), each dissolved in 10 ml e thanol were mixed with constant stirring. The stirring was continued for 30 min and the white product that formed, N(4)-cyclohexylthiosemicarbazide, was washed with ethanol and dried in vacuo. A solution of this (0.51 g, 3 mmol) in 10 ml me thanol was refluxed with a methanolic solution of pyruvic acid (0.261 g, 3 mmol) for 5 h after the addition of 1–2 drops of glacial acetic acid. On cooling the solution to room temperature, white precipitate separated, which were filtered and washed with methanol. The white precipitate was recrystallized from methanol to yield colourless prisms and dried in vacuo over silica gel. (M.pt. 465–467 K. Yield 0.621 g (80%). Anal. Found: C, 49.31; H, 7.01; N, 17.18%. C10H17N3O2S requires: C, 49.36; H, 7.04; N, 17.26%. FT—IR (KBr, cm-1) νmax: 3322 (m, OH), 3197 (s, NH), 2922, 2851 (s, cyclohexyl), 1692 (m, C═O), 1619 (w, C═N), 980 (m, N—N), 1249, 873 (w, C═S).

Refinement

Carbon-bound H-atoms were placed in calculated positions (C–H = 0.98 to 1.00 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding model approximation, with Uiso(H) set to 1.2–1.5Ueq(C). The O– and N-bound H-atoms were located in a difference Fourier map and were refined with distance restraints of O—H = 0.84±0.01 Å and N—H 0.88±0.01 Å, and with Uiso(H) = yUeq(N) for y = 1.5 (O) and 1.2 (N).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of (I) showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

A view of the supramolecular chain aligned along [110] in (I). The O—H···O and N—H···S hydrogen bonds are shown as orange and blue dashed lines, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

A view in projection down the b axis of the crystal packing in (I) showing the inter-digitation of the cyclohexyl rings along the c direction. The O—H···O and N—H···S hydrogen bonds are shown as orange and blue dashed lines, respectively.

Crystal data

C10H17N3O2S F(000) = 520
Mr = 243.33 Dx = 1.336 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/n Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yn Cell parameters from 3312 reflections
a = 8.9204 (2) Å θ = 2.3–29.1°
b = 6.0350 (2) Å µ = 0.26 mm−1
c = 22.4750 (6) Å T = 100 K
β = 90.051 (3)° Prism, colourless
V = 1209.93 (6) Å3 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.10 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Agilent Supernova Dual diffractometer with an Atlas detector 2723 independent reflections
Radiation source: SuperNova (Mo) X-ray Source 2251 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Mirror Rint = 0.036
Detector resolution: 10.4041 pixels mm-1 θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.5°
ω scans h = −11→11
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Agilent, 2010) k = −6→7
Tmin = 0.687, Tmax = 1.000 l = −29→29
7394 measured reflections

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.041 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.143 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 0.98 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2723 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
158 parameters Δρmax = 0.36 e Å−3
3 restraints Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 1.07001 (5) 1.46426 (7) 0.59008 (2) 0.01940 (18)
O1 0.65476 (14) 0.6300 (2) 0.54143 (6) 0.0209 (3)
O2 0.53180 (13) 0.7099 (2) 0.45694 (6) 0.0196 (3)
N1 0.80028 (16) 1.0010 (2) 0.53480 (7) 0.0156 (3)
N2 0.88614 (16) 1.1878 (2) 0.53543 (7) 0.0170 (3)
N3 0.94326 (16) 1.0938 (3) 0.63114 (7) 0.0169 (3)
C1 0.62814 (18) 0.7522 (3) 0.49413 (8) 0.0164 (4)
C2 0.72145 (19) 0.9564 (3) 0.48899 (8) 0.0162 (4)
C3 0.7098 (2) 1.0904 (3) 0.43363 (8) 0.0211 (4)
H3A 0.6904 1.2455 0.4440 0.032*
H3B 0.6273 1.0339 0.4091 0.032*
H3C 0.8039 1.0800 0.4113 0.032*
C4 0.96146 (18) 1.2376 (3) 0.58689 (8) 0.0156 (4)
C5 1.00682 (18) 1.1176 (3) 0.69060 (7) 0.0157 (4)
H5 1.1055 1.1951 0.6871 0.019*
C6 1.0336 (2) 0.8900 (3) 0.71759 (9) 0.0210 (4)
H6A 1.1037 0.8054 0.6921 0.025*
H6B 0.9377 0.8076 0.7194 0.025*
C7 1.0991 (2) 0.9113 (3) 0.78024 (8) 0.0221 (4)
H7A 1.1116 0.7618 0.7977 0.026*
H7B 1.1994 0.9811 0.7779 0.026*
C8 0.9984 (2) 1.0501 (3) 0.82063 (9) 0.0235 (4)
H8A 0.9019 0.9725 0.8267 0.028*
H8B 1.0471 1.0689 0.8599 0.028*
C9 0.9696 (2) 1.2771 (3) 0.79289 (9) 0.0250 (4)
H9A 0.8988 1.3610 0.8182 0.030*
H9B 1.0648 1.3611 0.7912 0.030*
C10 0.9048 (2) 1.2561 (3) 0.73033 (8) 0.0212 (4)
H10A 0.8046 1.1858 0.7325 0.025*
H10B 0.8924 1.4055 0.7128 0.025*
H1 0.602 (2) 0.514 (3) 0.5431 (12) 0.040 (7)*
H2 0.892 (2) 1.275 (3) 0.5035 (6) 0.026 (6)*
H3 0.888 (2) 0.976 (2) 0.6260 (11) 0.029 (6)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0251 (3) 0.0177 (3) 0.0154 (3) −0.00825 (16) −0.0030 (2) 0.00088 (18)
O1 0.0233 (6) 0.0208 (7) 0.0185 (7) −0.0089 (5) −0.0048 (5) 0.0055 (6)
O2 0.0200 (6) 0.0205 (7) 0.0182 (7) −0.0064 (5) −0.0030 (5) 0.0018 (5)
N1 0.0148 (7) 0.0144 (7) 0.0178 (8) −0.0030 (5) 0.0009 (6) −0.0010 (6)
N2 0.0214 (7) 0.0140 (7) 0.0157 (8) −0.0039 (6) −0.0007 (6) 0.0036 (6)
N3 0.0196 (7) 0.0172 (7) 0.0140 (8) −0.0068 (6) −0.0047 (6) 0.0006 (6)
C1 0.0159 (8) 0.0178 (9) 0.0155 (9) 0.0010 (7) 0.0000 (7) −0.0017 (7)
C2 0.0153 (8) 0.0168 (9) 0.0166 (9) −0.0015 (6) 0.0005 (7) 0.0006 (7)
C3 0.0247 (9) 0.0215 (9) 0.0169 (9) −0.0069 (7) −0.0040 (7) 0.0022 (8)
C4 0.0154 (8) 0.0160 (8) 0.0155 (8) −0.0002 (6) 0.0004 (7) −0.0008 (7)
C5 0.0173 (8) 0.0184 (9) 0.0112 (8) −0.0030 (7) −0.0038 (6) −0.0006 (7)
C6 0.0255 (9) 0.0168 (9) 0.0208 (9) 0.0006 (7) 0.0006 (8) −0.0003 (8)
C7 0.0266 (9) 0.0186 (9) 0.0210 (10) 0.0007 (7) −0.0032 (8) 0.0036 (8)
C8 0.0301 (10) 0.0263 (10) 0.0141 (9) −0.0050 (8) −0.0001 (8) −0.0016 (8)
C9 0.0318 (10) 0.0241 (10) 0.0191 (9) 0.0032 (8) −0.0004 (8) −0.0057 (8)
C10 0.0255 (9) 0.0197 (9) 0.0185 (9) 0.0037 (7) −0.0007 (8) −0.0011 (8)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S1—C4 1.6774 (18) C5—C10 1.525 (2)
O1—C1 1.315 (2) C5—H5 1.0000
O1—H1 0.845 (10) C6—C7 1.530 (3)
O2—C1 1.225 (2) C6—H6A 0.9900
N1—C2 1.275 (2) C6—H6B 0.9900
N1—N2 1.363 (2) C7—C8 1.528 (3)
N2—C4 1.370 (2) C7—H7A 0.9900
N2—H2 0.892 (9) C7—H7B 0.9900
N3—C4 1.330 (2) C8—C9 1.527 (3)
N3—C5 1.458 (2) C8—H8A 0.9900
N3—H3 0.870 (9) C8—H8B 0.9900
C1—C2 1.491 (2) C9—C10 1.525 (3)
C2—C3 1.488 (3) C9—H9A 0.9900
C3—H3A 0.9800 C9—H9B 0.9900
C3—H3B 0.9800 C10—H10A 0.9900
C3—H3C 0.9800 C10—H10B 0.9900
C5—C6 1.520 (3)
C1—O1—H1 113.7 (18) C5—C6—H6A 109.5
C2—N1—N2 119.52 (15) C7—C6—H6A 109.5
N1—N2—C4 117.71 (14) C5—C6—H6B 109.5
N1—N2—H2 121.1 (14) C7—C6—H6B 109.5
C4—N2—H2 121.2 (14) H6A—C6—H6B 108.1
C4—N3—C5 124.97 (14) C8—C7—C6 111.63 (15)
C4—N3—H3 120.2 (16) C8—C7—H7A 109.3
C5—N3—H3 114.8 (16) C6—C7—H7A 109.3
O2—C1—O1 124.08 (15) C8—C7—H7B 109.3
O2—C1—C2 120.71 (15) C6—C7—H7B 109.3
O1—C1—C2 115.18 (15) H7A—C7—H7B 108.0
N1—C2—C3 126.77 (15) C9—C8—C7 110.38 (16)
N1—C2—C1 114.80 (15) C9—C8—H8A 109.6
C3—C2—C1 118.38 (15) C7—C8—H8A 109.6
C2—C3—H3A 109.5 C9—C8—H8B 109.6
C2—C3—H3B 109.5 C7—C8—H8B 109.6
H3A—C3—H3B 109.5 H8A—C8—H8B 108.1
C2—C3—H3C 109.5 C10—C9—C8 111.43 (15)
H3A—C3—H3C 109.5 C10—C9—H9A 109.3
H3B—C3—H3C 109.5 C8—C9—H9A 109.3
N3—C4—N2 115.34 (15) C10—C9—H9B 109.3
N3—C4—S1 124.83 (14) C8—C9—H9B 109.3
N2—C4—S1 119.82 (13) H9A—C9—H9B 108.0
N3—C5—C6 109.71 (14) C5—C10—C9 111.06 (14)
N3—C5—C10 111.03 (14) C5—C10—H10A 109.4
C6—C5—C10 110.79 (15) C9—C10—H10A 109.4
N3—C5—H5 108.4 C5—C10—H10B 109.4
C6—C5—H5 108.4 C9—C10—H10B 109.4
C10—C5—H5 108.4 H10A—C10—H10B 108.0
C5—C6—C7 110.56 (15)
C2—N1—N2—C4 175.80 (15) C4—N3—C5—C6 −151.10 (16)
N2—N1—C2—C3 −0.7 (3) C4—N3—C5—C10 86.1 (2)
N2—N1—C2—C1 −178.00 (14) N3—C5—C6—C7 −179.54 (14)
O2—C1—C2—N1 169.21 (15) C10—C5—C6—C7 −56.59 (19)
O1—C1—C2—N1 −8.9 (2) C5—C6—C7—C8 56.5 (2)
O2—C1—C2—C3 −8.4 (2) C6—C7—C8—C9 −55.6 (2)
O1—C1—C2—C3 173.52 (15) C7—C8—C9—C10 55.2 (2)
C5—N3—C4—N2 −177.12 (15) N3—C5—C10—C9 178.84 (14)
C5—N3—C4—S1 4.2 (2) C6—C5—C10—C9 56.7 (2)
N1—N2—C4—N3 0.7 (2) C8—C9—C10—C5 −56.1 (2)
N1—N2—C4—S1 179.49 (12)

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
N3—H3···N1 0.87 (1) 2.20 (2) 2.574 (2) 106.(2)
O1—H1···O2i 0.85 (1) 1.80 (1) 2.6416 (17) 172 (3)
N2—H2···S1ii 0.89 (1) 2.65 (1) 3.5384 (15) 176.(2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, −y+1, −z+1; (ii) −x+2, −y+3, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: HB5851).

References

  1. Agilent (2010). CrysAlis PRO Agilent Technologies, Yarnton, Oxfordshire, England.
  2. Brandenburg, K. (2006). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  3. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  4. Normaya, E., Farina, Y., Halim, S. N. A. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o943–o944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Salam, M. A., Affan, M. A., Ahmad, F. B., Ng, S. W. & Tiekink, E. R. T. (2011). Acta Cryst. E67, o955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014449/hb5851sup1.cif

e-67-o1193-sup1.cif (17.1KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014449/hb5851Isup2.hkl

e-67-o1193-Isup2.hkl (133.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES