Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Apr 22;67(Pt 5):m629. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811014516

Tris(η5-cyclo­penta­dien­yl)hafnium(III)

Vladimir V Burlakov a, Perdita Arndt b, Anke Spannenberg b, Uwe Rosenthal b,*
PMCID: PMC3089176  PMID: 21754338

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the title compound, [Hf(C5H5)3], three cyclo­penta­dienyl ligands surround the HfIII atom in a trigonal–planar geometry. The mol­ecule lies on a sixfold inversion axis.

Related literature

Isotypic (η5-C5H5)3Zr was described by Lukens & Andersen (1995 ▶). For (η5-C5H5)3 M, M = Y: see Adam et al. (1991 ▶); M = Nd: see Eggers et al. (1992a ▶); M = Sm: see Wong et al. (1969 ▶), Bel’skii et al. (1991 ▶), Eggers et al. (1992b ▶); M = Er, Tm: see Eggers et al. (1986 ▶); M = Yb: see Eggers et al. (1987 ▶); M = Ce, Dy, Ho: see Baisch et al. (2006 ▶). Unit-cell dimensions of (η5-C5H5)3 M (M = Pr, Pm, Sm, Gd, Tb, Tm, Cm, Bk, Cf) were determined by Laubereau & Burns (1970a ▶,b ▶).graphic file with name e-67-0m629-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Hf(C5H5)3]

  • M r = 373.76

  • Hexagonal, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.9772 (4) Å

  • c = 10.2975 (6) Å

  • V = 567.50 (5) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 9.16 mm−1

  • T = 150 K

  • 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

  • Stoe IPDS II diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: numerical (X-SHAPE and X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.150, T max = 0.346

  • 7314 measured reflections

  • 362 independent reflections

  • 333 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.097

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034

  • wR(F 2) = 0.076

  • S = 1.22

  • 362 reflections

  • 27 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.95 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −3.40 e Å−3

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe & Cie, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-AREA; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014516/ng5148sup1.cif

e-67-0m629-sup1.cif (13.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014516/ng5148Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m629-Isup2.hkl (18.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the technical staff, in particular Regina Jesse, for assistance. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GRK 1213), and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 09-03-00503) is acknowledged.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In the reaction of (η5-C5H5)2Hf[—C(SiMe3)═C(C≡CSiMe3)— C(SiMe3)═C(C≡CSiMe3)—] with (i-Bu)2AlH single crystals of the title compound as lone product in very low yield were isolated. Isostructural compounds are known for M = Zr (Lukens et al., 1995), M = Y (Adam et al., 1991), M = Nd (Eggers et al., 1992a), M = Sm (Wong et al., 1969; Bel'skii et al., 1991; Eggers et al., 1992b), M = Er, Tm (Eggers et al., 1986), M = Yb (Eggers et al., 1987), M = Ce, Dy, Ho (Baisch et al., 2006). (η5-C5H5)3Hf crystallizes in the hexagonal space group P63/m with unit-cell dimensions isomorphous with the Zr analogue (Lukens et al., 1995). The Hf(III) center is surrounded by three η5-coordinated cyclopentadienyl ligands in a trigonal planar geometry. The Hf—C distances are with 2.547 (6) and 2.575 (6) Å in the expected range.

Experimental

An amount of 0.460 g (0.66 mmol) of the five membered metallacycle (η5-C5H5)2Hf[—C(SiMe3)═C(C≡CSiMe3)—C(SiMe3)═ C(C≡CSiMe3)—] was dissolved in 20 ml of n-hexane under Ar, and 2.6 ml (2.6 mmol) of a 1.0 M solution of (i-Bu)2AlH in cyclohexane was added to the obtained yellow solution. After one day the obtained red-brown solution was filtered and allowed to stand in argon atmosphere at -40 °C. After 6 month the light-yellow crystals had formed which were separated from the mother liquor by decanting, washed with cooled n-hexane, and dried in vacuum to give (η5-C5H5)3Hf. Yield 9.3% (23 mg). M.p. 261–263 °C (dec. under Ar). MS (70 eV, m/z): 375 (M+), 310 (M+-C5H5).

Refinement

H atoms were placed in idealized positions with d(C—H) = 0.95 Å and refined using a riding model with Uiso(H) fixed at 1.2 Ueq(C).

A numerical absorption correction was performed. Hence the largest peak of 0.95 (1.57 Å from Hf1) and the deepest hole of -3.40 e Å-3 (0.98 Å from Hf1) in the final difference Fourier map were obtained.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The molecular structure of the title compound showing the atom-labelling scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Crystal data

[Hf(C5H5)3] Dx = 2.187 Mg m−3
Mr = 373.76 Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hexagonal, P63/m Cell parameters from 4609 reflections
Hall symbol: -P 6c θ = 1.9–28.4°
a = 7.9772 (4) Å µ = 9.16 mm−1
c = 10.2975 (6) Å T = 150 K
V = 567.50 (5) Å3 Prism, yellow
Z = 2 0.30 × 0.20 × 0.15 mm
F(000) = 354

Data collection

Stoe IPDS II diffractometer 362 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 333 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.097
ω scans θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 3.0°
Absorption correction: numerical (X-SHAPE and X-RED32; Stoe & Cie, 2005) h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.150, Tmax = 0.346 k = −9→9
7314 measured reflections l = −12→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.076 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.22 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0163P)2 + 5.6136P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
362 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
27 parameters Δρmax = 0.95 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −3.40 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Hf1 0.3333 0.6667 0.2500 0.0342 (3)
C1 0.4331 (9) 0.4179 (9) 0.1824 (6) 0.0236 (13)
H1 0.5434 0.4592 0.1283 0.028*
C2 0.2408 (10) 0.3460 (10) 0.1393 (7) 0.0300 (15)
H2 0.1992 0.3347 0.0517 0.036*
C3 0.1229 (14) 0.2944 (13) 0.2500 0.026 (2)
H3 −0.0143 0.2344 0.2500 0.032*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Hf1 0.0126 (3) 0.0126 (3) 0.0772 (6) 0.00632 (15) 0.000 0.000
C1 0.022 (3) 0.019 (3) 0.031 (3) 0.011 (3) 0.003 (3) −0.002 (3)
C2 0.024 (3) 0.027 (4) 0.035 (4) 0.010 (3) −0.004 (3) −0.001 (3)
C3 0.017 (4) 0.014 (4) 0.048 (6) 0.008 (4) 0.000 0.000

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Hf1—C2i 2.549 (7) Hf1—C1 2.576 (6)
Hf1—C2ii 2.549 (7) Hf1—C1ii 2.576 (6)
Hf1—C2iii 2.549 (7) C1—C1ii 1.392 (12)
Hf1—C2iv 2.549 (7) C1—C2 1.414 (9)
Hf1—C2 2.549 (7) C1—H1 0.9500
Hf1—C2v 2.549 (7) C2—C3 1.402 (9)
Hf1—C1i 2.576 (6) C2—H2 0.9500
Hf1—C1iii 2.576 (6) C3—C2ii 1.402 (9)
Hf1—C1iv 2.576 (6) C3—H3 0.9500
Hf1—C1v 2.576 (6)
C2i—Hf1—C2ii 101.55 (19) C1i—Hf1—C1v 122.45 (4)
C2i—Hf1—C2iii 53.1 (3) C1iii—Hf1—C1v 112.98 (12)
C2ii—Hf1—C2iii 126.86 (8) C1iv—Hf1—C1v 31.4 (3)
C2i—Hf1—C2iv 101.55 (19) C2i—Hf1—C1 152.1 (2)
C2ii—Hf1—C2iv 101.55 (19) C2ii—Hf1—C1 52.7 (2)
C2iii—Hf1—C2iv 126.86 (8) C2iii—Hf1—C1 130.0 (2)
C2i—Hf1—C2 126.86 (8) C2iv—Hf1—C1 94.8 (2)
C2ii—Hf1—C2 53.1 (3) C2—Hf1—C1 32.0 (2)
C2iii—Hf1—C2 101.55 (19) C2v—Hf1—C1 81.0 (2)
C2iv—Hf1—C2 126.86 (8) C1i—Hf1—C1 122.45 (4)
C2i—Hf1—C2v 126.86 (8) C1iii—Hf1—C1 112.98 (12)
C2ii—Hf1—C2v 126.86 (8) C1iv—Hf1—C1 122.45 (4)
C2iii—Hf1—C2v 101.55 (19) C1v—Hf1—C1 112.98 (12)
C2iv—Hf1—C2v 53.1 (3) C2i—Hf1—C1ii 130.0 (2)
C2—Hf1—C2v 101.55 (19) C2ii—Hf1—C1ii 32.0 (2)
C2i—Hf1—C1i 32.0 (2) C2iii—Hf1—C1ii 152.1 (2)
C2ii—Hf1—C1i 81.0 (2) C2iv—Hf1—C1ii 81.0 (2)
C2iii—Hf1—C1i 52.7 (2) C2—Hf1—C1ii 52.7 (2)
C2iv—Hf1—C1i 130.0 (2) C2v—Hf1—C1ii 94.8 (2)
C2—Hf1—C1i 94.8 (2) C1i—Hf1—C1ii 112.98 (12)
C2v—Hf1—C1i 152.2 (2) C1iii—Hf1—C1ii 122.45 (4)
C2i—Hf1—C1iii 52.7 (2) C1iv—Hf1—C1ii 112.98 (12)
C2ii—Hf1—C1iii 94.8 (2) C1v—Hf1—C1ii 122.45 (4)
C2iii—Hf1—C1iii 32.0 (2) C1—Hf1—C1ii 31.4 (3)
C2iv—Hf1—C1iii 152.2 (2) C1ii—C1—C2 108.3 (4)
C2—Hf1—C1iii 81.0 (2) C1ii—C1—Hf1 74.32 (14)
C2v—Hf1—C1iii 130.0 (2) C2—C1—Hf1 72.9 (4)
C1i—Hf1—C1iii 31.4 (3) C1ii—C1—H1 125.9
C2i—Hf1—C1iv 81.0 (2) C2—C1—H1 125.9
C2ii—Hf1—C1iv 130.0 (2) Hf1—C1—H1 118.7
C2iii—Hf1—C1iv 94.8 (2) C3—C2—C1 107.3 (6)
C2iv—Hf1—C1iv 32.0 (2) C3—C2—Hf1 75.3 (5)
C2—Hf1—C1iv 152.2 (2) C1—C2—Hf1 75.0 (4)
C2v—Hf1—C1iv 52.7 (2) C3—C2—H2 126.4
C1i—Hf1—C1iv 112.98 (12) C1—C2—H2 126.4
C1iii—Hf1—C1iv 122.45 (4) Hf1—C2—H2 115.6
C2i—Hf1—C1v 94.8 (2) C2—C3—C2ii 108.7 (8)
C2ii—Hf1—C1v 152.2 (2) C2—C3—Hf1 73.0 (5)
C2iii—Hf1—C1v 81.0 (2) C2ii—C3—Hf1 73.0 (5)
C2iv—Hf1—C1v 52.7 (2) C2—C3—H3 125.6
C2—Hf1—C1v 130.0 (2) C2ii—C3—H3 125.6
C2v—Hf1—C1v 32.0 (2) Hf1—C3—H3 120.2

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+y, −x+1, −z+1/2; (ii) x, y, −z+1/2; (iii) −x+y, −x+1, z; (iv) −y+1, x−y+1, −z+1/2; (v) −y+1, x−y+1, z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: NG5148).

References

  1. Adam, M., Behrens, U. & Fischer, R. D. (1991). Acta Cryst. C47, 968–971.
  2. Baisch, U., Pagano, S., Zeuner, M., Schmedt auf der Günne, J., Oeckler, O. & Schnick, W. (2006). Organometallics, 25, 3027–3033.
  3. Bel’skii, V. K., Gun’ko, Y. K., Soloveichik, G. D. & Bulychev, B. M. (1991). Metalloorg. Khim. (Russ.), 4, 577.
  4. Eggers, S., Hinrichs, W., Kopf, J., Fischer, R. D. & Xing-Fu, L. (1992a). Private communication (refcode SOVYAD). CCDC, Cambridge, England.
  5. Eggers, S., Hinrichs, W., Kopf, J., Fischer, R. D. & Xing-Fu, L. (1992b). Private communication (refcode CYPESM02). CCDC, Cambridge, England.
  6. Eggers, S. H., Hinrichs, W., Kopf, J., Jahn, W. & Fischer, R. D. (1986). J. Organomet. Chem. 311, 313–323.
  7. Eggers, S. H., Kopf, J. & Fischer, R. D. (1987). Acta Cryst. C43, 2288–2290.
  8. Laubereau, P. G. & Burns, J. H. (1970a). Inorg. Chem. 9, 1091–1095.
  9. Laubereau, P. G. & Burns, J. H. (1970b). Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 6, 59–63.
  10. Lukens, W. W. Jr & Andersen, R. A. (1995). Organometallics, 14, 3435–3439.
  11. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Stoe & Cie (2005). X-SHAPE, X-RED32 and X-AREA Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.
  13. Wong, C.-H., Lee, T.-Y. & Lee, Y.-T. (1969). Acta Cryst. B25, 2580–2587.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014516/ng5148sup1.cif

e-67-0m629-sup1.cif (13.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014516/ng5148Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m629-Isup2.hkl (18.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES