Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Apr 7;67(Pt 5):m532. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811011913

Poly[aqua­bis­(μ-formato-κ2 O:O′)(μ-pyrazine-κ2 N:N′)nickel(II)]

Susanne Wöhlert a,*, Mario Wriedt b, Inke Jess a, Christian Näther a
PMCID: PMC3089312  PMID: 21754272

Abstract

In the title compound, [Ni(CHO2)2(C4H4N2)(H2O)], the nickel(II) cations are coordinated by three O-bonded-formato anions, two N-bonded-pyrazine ligands and one water mol­ecule in an octa­hedral coordination mode. The nickel(II) cations are connected by μ-1,3-bridging formato anions and N,N′-bridging pyrazine ligands into a three dimensional coordination network. The asymmetric unit consists of one nickel(II) cation, one water mol­ecule and two crystallograph­ically independent formato anions in general positions as well as two crystallographically independent pyrazine ligands, which are located on centers of inversion.

Related literature

For background of this work, see: Boeckmann & Näther (2010 ▶), Wriedt et al. (2009) ▶; Boeckmann et al. (2010 ▶). For a related structure, see: Manson et al. (2003 ▶). For a description of the Cambridge Structural Database, see: Allen (2002 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-0m532-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Ni(CHO2)2(C4H4N2)(H2O)]

  • M r = 246.85

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.8169 (4) Å

  • b = 7.0077 (3) Å

  • c = 15.6586 (7) Å

  • β = 98.971 (4)°

  • V = 847.26 (7) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.29 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.19 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm

Data collection

  • Stoe IPDS-2 diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: numerical (X-SHAPE and X-RED32; Stoe, 2008 ▶) T min = 0.658, T max = 0.770

  • 15596 measured reflections

  • 2291 independent reflections

  • 2091 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.036

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.025

  • wR(F 2) = 0.059

  • S = 1.10

  • 2291 reflections

  • 128 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.30 e Å−3

Data collection: X-AREA (Stoe, 2008 ▶); cell refinement: X-AREA; data reduction: X-AREA; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XP in SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: XP in SHELXTL and DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2011 ▶).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811011913/bt5501sup1.cif

e-67-0m532-sup1.cif (14.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811011913/bt5501Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m532-Isup2.hkl (112.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the DFG (project number NA 720/3-1) and the State of Schleswig-Holstein. We thank Professor Dr Bensch for access to his experimental facilities.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In our recent work on the synthesis, structures and properties of new coordination polymers based on paramagnetic transition metal, small-sized anions and N-donor ligands, we have shown that new ligand-deficient coordination polymers based on transition metal thiocyanates and selenocyanates can be prepared by thermal decomposition reactions (Wriedt, Jess & Näther, 2009 and Boeckmann & Näther, 2010). Later we have shown that also metal formates can be prepared by this route (Boeckmann, Wriedt & Näther, 2010). Within this project we tried to prepare new ligand-rich precursor compounds based on nickel(II) formate and pyrazine which resulted in the formation of the title compound that were identified by single crystal X-ray diffraction.

In the crystal structure of the title compound, each nickel(II) cation is coordinated by three bridging formato anions, two bridging pyrazine ligands and one water molecule (Fig. 1). The NiO4N2 octahedron is slightly distorted with Ni—OCHO distances between 2.0378 (11) Å and 2.0643 (12) Å and one Ni—OH2 distance of 2.0420 (11) Å as well as two long Ni—N distances of 2.1066 (13) Å and 2.1171 (12) Å. The angles around the metal atoms range from 84.14 (5)° to 95.94 (5)° and from 173.18 (5)° to 179.19 (5)°. The nickel(II) cations are connected via µ-1,3 bridging formato anions into two dimensional Ni(O2CHO)2 layers that are further linked by the pyrazine ligands into a 3D coordination network (Fig. 2). The Ni—Ni distances between next neighboured Ni atoms ranges from 6.9770 (4) Å to 7.0689 (4) Å.

It must be noted that according to a search in the CCDC database (ConQuest Ver.1.12.) (Allen, 2002) compounds based on nickel(II) formate and pyrazine are unknown but with copper(II) formate one strcuture is reported (Manson et al., 2003).

Experimental

Nickel formate dihydrate [Ni(CHO2)2.H2O] and pyrazine were obtained from Alfa Aesar. All chemicals were used without further purification. 0.25 mmol (46 mg) Ni(CHO2)2.H2O and 0.5 mmol (40 mg) pyrazine were reacted in 2 ml water. Light blue block-shaped single crystals of the title compound were obtained after a few days at room temperature.

Refinement

The C-H H atoms were positioned with idealized geometry and were refined isotropic with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) and C—H distances of 0.93 Å using a riding model. The O-H H atoms were located in difference map, their bond lengths were set to 0.82 Å and afterwards they were refined isotropic with Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O) using a riding model.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

: Crystal structure of the title compound with labelling and displacement ellipsoids drawn at the 50 % probability level. Symmetry codes: i = -x+1, y+1/2 i = -x+1,y+1/2,-z+3/2; ii = -x+1,-y,-z+1; iii = -x,-y+1,-z+1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

: Crystal structure of the title compound with view along the crystallographic a-axis.

Crystal data

[Ni(CHO2)2(C4H4N2)(H2O)] F(000) = 504
Mr = 246.85 Dx = 1.935 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 15596 reflections
a = 7.8169 (4) Å θ = 2.6–29.3°
b = 7.0077 (3) Å µ = 2.29 mm−1
c = 15.6586 (7) Å T = 293 K
β = 98.971 (4)° Block, light blue
V = 847.26 (7) Å3 0.19 × 0.15 × 0.12 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Stoe IPDS-2 diffractometer 2291 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 2091 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.036
ω scan θmax = 29.3°, θmin = 2.6°
Absorption correction: numerical (X-SHAPE and X-RED32; Stoe, 2008) h = −10→10
Tmin = 0.658, Tmax = 0.770 k = −9→9
15596 measured reflections l = −21→21

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.059 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.025P)2 + 0.4622P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.10 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2291 reflections Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3
128 parameters Δρmin = −0.30 e Å−3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL, Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0158 (13)

Special details

Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Ni1 0.30005 (2) 0.25657 (3) 0.649349 (11) 0.01731 (8)
N1 0.41659 (17) 0.10169 (18) 0.55756 (8) 0.0205 (2)
C1 0.3337 (2) 0.0453 (2) 0.48084 (10) 0.0250 (3)
H1 0.2169 0.0747 0.4654 0.030*
C2 0.5831 (2) 0.0558 (2) 0.57642 (10) 0.0257 (3)
H2 0.6452 0.0925 0.6294 0.031*
N11 0.12229 (17) 0.39364 (18) 0.55394 (8) 0.0209 (2)
C11 −0.0463 (2) 0.3831 (2) 0.55924 (11) 0.0241 (3)
H11 −0.0827 0.3027 0.6001 0.029*
C12 0.1684 (2) 0.5112 (2) 0.49450 (10) 0.0234 (3)
H12 0.2847 0.5224 0.4891 0.028*
O21 0.11734 (15) 0.04433 (16) 0.65066 (8) 0.0275 (3)
O22 0.0548 (2) −0.25397 (17) 0.67969 (12) 0.0434 (4)
C21 0.1545 (2) −0.1280 (2) 0.66185 (12) 0.0279 (3)
H21 0.2693 −0.1604 0.6602 0.042*
O31 0.46637 (15) 0.11818 (18) 0.74213 (8) 0.0282 (3)
O32 0.51992 (15) −0.03704 (17) 0.86756 (7) 0.0260 (2)
C31 0.4364 (2) 0.0746 (2) 0.81445 (11) 0.0258 (3)
H31 0.3479 0.1347 0.8375 0.039*
O41 0.18980 (15) 0.40396 (16) 0.73925 (7) 0.0241 (2)
H1O 0.1126 0.3547 0.7617 0.036*
H2O 0.1500 0.5093 0.7246 0.036*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Ni1 0.01857 (11) 0.01683 (11) 0.01653 (11) 0.00177 (7) 0.00272 (7) 0.00092 (7)
N1 0.0220 (6) 0.0203 (6) 0.0198 (6) 0.0012 (5) 0.0049 (5) −0.0023 (5)
C1 0.0200 (7) 0.0306 (8) 0.0238 (7) 0.0045 (6) 0.0020 (6) −0.0043 (6)
C2 0.0230 (7) 0.0321 (8) 0.0212 (7) 0.0019 (6) 0.0007 (6) −0.0070 (6)
N11 0.0214 (6) 0.0199 (6) 0.0206 (6) 0.0019 (5) 0.0007 (5) 0.0018 (5)
C11 0.0233 (7) 0.0245 (7) 0.0243 (7) 0.0000 (6) 0.0030 (6) 0.0059 (6)
C12 0.0194 (7) 0.0258 (7) 0.0248 (7) 0.0013 (6) 0.0029 (6) 0.0035 (6)
O21 0.0261 (6) 0.0184 (5) 0.0390 (7) −0.0001 (4) 0.0077 (5) 0.0045 (5)
O22 0.0477 (8) 0.0184 (6) 0.0720 (11) 0.0009 (5) 0.0340 (8) 0.0041 (6)
C21 0.0283 (8) 0.0206 (7) 0.0372 (9) 0.0027 (6) 0.0128 (7) 0.0011 (6)
O31 0.0273 (6) 0.0356 (6) 0.0218 (5) 0.0097 (5) 0.0043 (5) 0.0080 (5)
O32 0.0296 (6) 0.0276 (6) 0.0208 (5) 0.0089 (5) 0.0039 (4) 0.0040 (4)
C31 0.0286 (8) 0.0266 (8) 0.0227 (7) 0.0087 (6) 0.0054 (6) 0.0020 (6)
O41 0.0264 (6) 0.0208 (5) 0.0271 (6) 0.0015 (4) 0.0101 (4) −0.0002 (4)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Ni1—O31 2.0378 (11) C11—C12iii 1.385 (2)
Ni1—O41 2.0420 (11) C11—H11 0.9300
Ni1—O32i 2.0636 (11) C12—C11iii 1.385 (2)
Ni1—O21 2.0643 (12) C12—H12 0.9300
Ni1—N11 2.1066 (13) O21—C21 1.2479 (19)
Ni1—N1 2.1171 (12) O22—C21 1.238 (2)
N1—C2 1.328 (2) C21—H21 0.9300
N1—C1 1.333 (2) O31—C31 1.230 (2)
C1—C2ii 1.382 (2) O32—C31 1.2492 (19)
C1—H1 0.9300 O32—Ni1iv 2.0636 (11)
C2—C1ii 1.382 (2) C31—H31 0.9299
C2—H2 0.9300 O41—H1O 0.8200
N11—C12 1.334 (2) O41—H2O 0.8200
N11—C11 1.335 (2)
O31—Ni1—O41 92.30 (5) C1ii—C2—H2 119.2
O31—Ni1—O32i 93.04 (5) C12—N11—C11 117.00 (13)
O41—Ni1—O32i 95.94 (5) C12—N11—Ni1 123.80 (11)
O31—Ni1—O21 90.89 (5) C11—N11—Ni1 118.62 (10)
O41—Ni1—O21 89.46 (5) N11—C11—C12iii 121.75 (14)
O32i—Ni1—O21 173.18 (5) N11—C11—H11 119.1
O31—Ni1—N11 178.28 (5) C12iii—C11—H11 119.1
O41—Ni1—N11 87.46 (5) N11—C12—C11iii 121.25 (14)
O32i—Ni1—N11 88.68 (5) N11—C12—H12 119.4
O21—Ni1—N11 87.40 (5) C11iii—C12—H12 119.4
O31—Ni1—N1 86.89 (5) C21—O21—Ni1 123.54 (11)
O41—Ni1—N1 179.19 (5) O22—C21—O21 125.53 (16)
O32i—Ni1—N1 84.14 (5) O22—C21—H21 118.4
O21—Ni1—N1 90.52 (5) O21—C21—H21 115.9
N11—Ni1—N1 93.35 (5) C31—O31—Ni1 125.64 (11)
C2—N1—C1 116.76 (13) C31—O32—Ni1iv 130.50 (10)
C2—N1—Ni1 118.93 (11) O31—C31—O32 127.86 (15)
C1—N1—Ni1 124.31 (10) O31—C31—H31 120.4
N1—C1—C2ii 121.65 (14) O32—C31—H31 111.6
N1—C1—H1 119.2 Ni1—O41—H1O 120.0
C2ii—C1—H1 119.2 Ni1—O41—H2O 116.4
N1—C2—C1ii 121.59 (15) H1O—O41—H2O 103.1
N1—C2—H2 119.2

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y+1/2, −z+3/2; (ii) −x+1, −y, −z+1; (iii) −x, −y+1, −z+1; (iv) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+3/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: BT5501).

References

  1. Allen, F. H. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 380–388. [DOI] [PubMed]
  2. Boeckmann, J. & Näther, C. (2010). Dalton Trans. 39, 1119-1126. [DOI] [PubMed]
  3. Boeckmann, J., Wriedt, M. & Näther, C. (2010). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1820-1828.
  4. Brandenburg, K. (2011). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  5. Manson, J. L., Lecher, J. G., Gu, J., Geiser, U., Schlueter, J. A., Henning, R., Wang, X., Schultz, A. J., Koo, H.-J. & Whangbo, M.-H. (2003). Dalton Trans. pp. 2905–2911.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Stoe (2008). X-AREA, X-RED32 and X-SHAPE Stoe & Cie, Darmstadt, Germany.
  8. Wriedt, M., Jess, I. & Näther, C. (2009). Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. pp. 1406–1413.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811011913/bt5501sup1.cif

e-67-0m532-sup1.cif (14.3KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811011913/bt5501Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m532-Isup2.hkl (112.7KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES