Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Apr 29;67(Pt 5):o1208. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811014607

Bis(5-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl) disulfide dihydrate

Ai-Xin Zhu a,*, Jun-Na Liu b, Zhen Li a, Hong-Can Wang a, Yuan-Chao Du a
PMCID: PMC3089328  PMID: 21754507

Abstract

A crystallographic twofold axis passing through the centre of the disulfide linkage in the title compound, C16H12N6S2·2H2O, results in one-half of the mol­ecule and one uncoordinated water mol­ecule described in the asymmetric unit. In the mol­ecule, the mean planes of the benzene and triazole rings are close to being coplanar and are separated by a dihedral angle of 2.08 (15)°. The triazole rings are twisted by a dihedral angle of 37.67 (6)° from the disulfide linkage. The crystal packing is stabilized by inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds with the water mol­ecules, forming a three-dimensional supra­molecular network.

Related literature

For applications of 1,2,4-triazole and its derivatives in coordination chemistry, see: Zhang et al. (2005 ▶); Ouellette et al. (2007 ▶); Zhu et al. (2009 ▶). For the related structure of a 1,2,4-triazole-based disulfide compound, see: Jiang et al. (2007 ▶). For the previous synthesis of the title compound, see: El-Wareth & Sarhan (2000 ▶).graphic file with name e-67-o1208-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C16H12N6S2·2H2O

  • M r = 388.47

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 12.3911 (13) Å

  • b = 14.7125 (16) Å

  • c = 10.2966 (11) Å

  • β = 104.125 (2)°

  • V = 1820.4 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.32 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996 ▶) T min = 0.884, T max = 0.945

  • 7210 measured reflections

  • 1953 independent reflections

  • 1679 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.023

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.042

  • wR(F 2) = 0.120

  • S = 1.06

  • 1953 reflections

  • 118 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 1999 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014607/jj2087sup1.cif

e-67-o1208-sup1.cif (14.1KB, cif)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014607/jj2087Isup2.cdx

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014607/jj2087Isup3.hkl

e-67-o1208-Isup3.hkl (96.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A D⋯A D—H⋯A
O1—H1C⋯N3 0.90 2.02 2.9210 (19) 178
N1—H1B⋯O1i 0.86 1.90 2.7077 (19) 156
O1—H1D⋯N2ii 0.84 2.07 2.909 (2) 171

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Youth Foundation of Yunnan Normal University (grant No. 10QZ02), the Science Foundation of the Education Department of Yunnan Province (grant No. 2010Y004) and Henan University of Science and Technology for supporting this work.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In the past few years, 1,2,4-triazole and its derivatives have attracted increasing attention as an N-heterocyclic aromatic ligand, since they can combine both imidazoles and pyrazoles in their coordination geometry. In addition, metal-triazolate frameworks can exhibit special luminescent, magnetic and favourable gas-adsorption abilities (Ouellette et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2009). 1,2,4-triazole based thiols and disulfides are important 1,2,4-triazole derivatives, and may exhibit a more diverse coordination geometry by combining heterocyclic nitrogen and sulfur donor atoms, and therefore affect biological activity behaviour. However, only one example of a crystallographic study on organic 1,2,4-triazole based disulfide compounds is found in the literature (Jiang et al. 2007). Although the synthesis of the compound 1,2-bis(5-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-yl)disulfide has been reported by El-Wareth & Sarhan (2000), no crystallographic study has been reported on the ligand and related metal coordination compounds. We reported herein another synthetic method and the crystal structure of the title compound.

A crystallographic 2-fold axis passing through the centroid of the disulfide linkage in the title compound, C16H12N6S2.2H2O, results in one-half of the molecule and one uncoordinated water molecule described in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1). In the molecule, the mean planes of the benzene and triazole rings are close to coplanar, separated by a dihedral angle of 2.08 (15)°. The triazole rings are twisted by a dihedral angle of 37.67 (6)° from the disulfide linkage. Crystal packing is stabilized by intermolecular N—H···O and O—H···N hydrogen bonds with the water molecules forming a three-dimensional supramolecular network (Fig. 2).

Experimental

A mixture of iron dichloride tetrahydrate (40 mg, 0.2 mmol), 3-phenyl-1H-1,2,4-triazole-5(4H)-thione (35 mg, 0.2 mmol), 8 ml methanol and 4 ml acetonitrile was stirred for 10 min, then filtered and allowed to stand at room temperature for about two weeks. Yellow polyhedron crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained.

Refinement

All H atoms were placed in idealized positions (O—H = 0.85 Å, N—H = 0.86 Å and C—H = 0.95 Å) and refined as riding atoms with Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C,N) and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq(O).

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Molecular structure of the title compound, with atom labels and 30% probability displacement ellipsoids for non-H atoms.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Packing diagram of the title compound viewed down the a axis. O—H···N and N—H···O hydrogen bonds with the water molecule are shown with dashed lines.

Crystal data

C16H12N6S2·2H2O F(000) = 808
Mr = 388.47 Dx = 1.417 Mg m−3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 3134 reflections
a = 12.3911 (13) Å θ = 2.7–26.4°
b = 14.7125 (16) Å µ = 0.32 mm−1
c = 10.2966 (11) Å T = 293 K
β = 104.125 (2)° Polyhedron, yellow
V = 1820.4 (3) Å3 0.40 × 0.20 × 0.18 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer 1953 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1679 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.023
ω scans θmax = 27.0°, θmin = 2.2°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −15→15
Tmin = 0.884, Tmax = 0.945 k = −18→18
7210 measured reflections l = −13→13

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.120 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.06 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0691P)2 + 0.5857P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1953 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
118 parameters Δρmax = 0.20 e Å−3
0 restraints Δρmin = −0.18 e Å−3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R-factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.43278 (4) 0.48004 (3) 0.16853 (5) 0.0605 (2)
N1 0.26234 (13) 0.68205 (9) 0.22572 (14) 0.0535 (4)
H1B 0.2373 0.7366 0.2112 0.064*
N2 0.33478 (13) 0.64316 (9) 0.16425 (15) 0.0554 (4)
N3 0.28640 (12) 0.54543 (9) 0.30878 (14) 0.0501 (3)
C1 0.13764 (18) 0.58140 (14) 0.4862 (2) 0.0673 (5)
H1A 0.1698 0.5240 0.4897 0.081*
C2 0.0682 (2) 0.60203 (17) 0.5693 (2) 0.0792 (6)
H2A 0.0543 0.5586 0.6288 0.095*
C3 0.01979 (18) 0.68669 (16) 0.5640 (2) 0.0729 (6)
H3A −0.0284 0.6999 0.6180 0.087*
C4 0.0428 (2) 0.75119 (16) 0.4792 (2) 0.0723 (6)
H4A 0.0115 0.8088 0.4773 0.087*
C5 0.11194 (17) 0.73153 (13) 0.3963 (2) 0.0615 (5)
H5A 0.1270 0.7759 0.3388 0.074*
C6 0.15919 (13) 0.64584 (11) 0.39834 (16) 0.0478 (4)
C7 0.23446 (14) 0.62407 (11) 0.31284 (16) 0.0461 (4)
C8 0.34687 (14) 0.56106 (11) 0.21779 (17) 0.0503 (4)
O1 0.27936 (14) 0.35247 (9) 0.37303 (13) 0.0762 (5)
H1D 0.3018 0.3501 0.4572 0.091*
H1C 0.2833 0.4118 0.3533 0.091*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0728 (4) 0.0462 (3) 0.0721 (3) −0.00574 (19) 0.0364 (3) −0.01332 (19)
N1 0.0701 (9) 0.0405 (7) 0.0563 (8) 0.0046 (6) 0.0276 (7) 0.0048 (6)
N2 0.0731 (9) 0.0448 (8) 0.0561 (8) −0.0012 (7) 0.0305 (7) 0.0014 (6)
N3 0.0584 (8) 0.0412 (7) 0.0564 (8) −0.0014 (6) 0.0248 (6) 0.0027 (6)
C1 0.0780 (13) 0.0589 (11) 0.0745 (12) 0.0101 (9) 0.0371 (10) 0.0135 (9)
C2 0.0917 (16) 0.0835 (15) 0.0757 (14) 0.0031 (12) 0.0463 (12) 0.0154 (11)
C3 0.0697 (13) 0.0864 (15) 0.0716 (13) 0.0043 (11) 0.0347 (10) −0.0062 (11)
C4 0.0757 (13) 0.0681 (13) 0.0813 (14) 0.0161 (10) 0.0347 (11) −0.0006 (10)
C5 0.0693 (12) 0.0539 (10) 0.0671 (11) 0.0098 (9) 0.0278 (9) 0.0082 (8)
C6 0.0478 (8) 0.0494 (9) 0.0477 (8) −0.0011 (7) 0.0142 (7) 0.0003 (7)
C7 0.0517 (9) 0.0405 (8) 0.0476 (8) −0.0031 (6) 0.0150 (7) 0.0014 (6)
C8 0.0596 (10) 0.0420 (8) 0.0543 (9) −0.0052 (7) 0.0233 (7) −0.0033 (7)
O1 0.1323 (14) 0.0421 (7) 0.0576 (8) −0.0052 (7) 0.0300 (8) −0.0033 (5)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S1—C8 1.7536 (17) C2—C3 1.378 (3)
S1—S1i 2.0556 (11) C2—H2A 0.9300
N1—C7 1.343 (2) C3—C4 1.366 (3)
N1—N2 1.346 (2) C3—H3A 0.9300
N1—H1B 0.8600 C4—C5 1.380 (3)
N2—C8 1.321 (2) C4—H4A 0.9300
N3—C7 1.330 (2) C5—C6 1.388 (2)
N3—C8 1.355 (2) C5—H5A 0.9300
C1—C6 1.381 (2) C6—C7 1.466 (2)
C1—C2 1.386 (3) O1—H1D 0.8434
C1—H1A 0.9300 O1—H1C 0.9007
C8—S1—S1i 101.08 (6) C3—C4—H4A 119.7
C7—N1—N2 110.73 (14) C5—C4—H4A 119.7
C7—N1—H1B 124.6 C4—C5—C6 120.28 (19)
N2—N1—H1B 124.6 C4—C5—H5A 119.9
C8—N2—N1 102.31 (13) C6—C5—H5A 119.9
C7—N3—C8 103.16 (14) C1—C6—C5 119.04 (17)
C6—C1—C2 120.15 (19) C1—C6—C7 119.78 (16)
C6—C1—H1A 119.9 C5—C6—C7 121.14 (16)
C2—C1—H1A 119.9 N3—C7—N1 109.05 (14)
C3—C2—C1 120.2 (2) N3—C7—C6 126.37 (15)
C3—C2—H2A 119.9 N1—C7—C6 124.58 (15)
C1—C2—H2A 119.9 N2—C8—N3 114.73 (15)
C4—C3—C2 119.78 (19) N2—C8—S1 121.06 (13)
C4—C3—H3A 120.1 N3—C8—S1 124.19 (13)
C2—C3—H3A 120.1 H1D—O1—H1C 104.4
C3—C4—C5 120.5 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O1—H1C···N3 0.90 2.02 2.9210 (19) 178.
N1—H1B···O1ii 0.86 1.90 2.7077 (19) 156.
O1—H1D···N2iii 0.84 2.07 2.909 (2) 171.

Symmetry codes: (ii) −x+1/2, y+1/2, −z+1/2; (iii) x, −y+1, z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: JJ2087).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. (1999). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2004). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Winconsin, USA.
  3. El-Wareth, A. & Sarhan, A. O. (2000). Heteroat. Chem. 11, 399–402.
  4. Jiang, W.-Q., Liu, T.-B., Zou, J.-P. & Zhang, Y. (2007). Chin. J. Struct. Chem. 26, 445–449.
  5. Ouellette, W., Prosvirin, A. V., Valeich, J., Dunbar, K. R. & Zubieta, J. (2007). Inorg. Chem. 46, 9067–9082. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  7. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Zhang, J.-P., Lin, Y.-Y., Huang, X.-C. & Chen, X.-M. (2005). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 5495–5506. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Zhu, A.-X., Lin, J.-B., Zhang, J.-P. & Chen, X.-M. (2009). Inorg. Chem. 48, 3882–3889. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014607/jj2087sup1.cif

e-67-o1208-sup1.cif (14.1KB, cif)

Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014607/jj2087Isup2.cdx

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811014607/jj2087Isup3.hkl

e-67-o1208-Isup3.hkl (96.2KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES