Skip to main content
Journal of Applied Physics logoLink to Journal of Applied Physics
. 2011 Apr 8;109(7):07B536–07B536-3. doi: 10.1063/1.3565190

Synthesis and characterization of core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe fluorescent magnetic nanoparticles

José M Vargas 1, Amber A McBride 1, John B Plumley 1, Yann Fichou 1,a), Tosifa A Memon 1, Vichiksha Shah 1, Nathaniel C Cook 1, Brian A Akins 1, Antonio C Rivera 1, Gennady A Smolyakov 1, James R O’Brien 2, Natalie L Adolphi 3, Hugh D C Smyth 4, Marek Osiński 1,b)
PMCID: PMC3089650  PMID: 21559088

Abstract

We report on the successful preparation and characterization of fluorescent magnetic core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe nanoparticles (NPs) with a spherical shape by organometallic synthesis. The 7 nm core∕3 nm shell NPs show good magnetic and photoluminescence (PL) responses. The observed PL emission∕excitation spectra are shifted to shorter wavelengths, compared to a reference ZnSe NP sample. A dramatic reduction of PL quantum yield is also observed. The temperature dependence of the magnetization for the core∕shell NPs shows the characteristic features of two coexisting and interacting magnetic (Fe3O4) and nonmagnetic (ZnSe) phases. Compared to a reference Fe3O4 NP sample, the room-temperature Néel relaxation time in core∕shell NPs is three times longer.


Engineered multifunctional nanoparticles (NPs) with highly integrated imaging modalities are a key focus area in bionanotechnology that will have a profound impact on molecular diagnosis, imaging, and therapeutics.1, 2, 3 However, combining multiple components on a nanometer scale to create new imaging modalities not available from the individual components has proven to be challenging.4 An example of such multifunctional NPs are fluorescent magnetic NPs that bear two attractive features, fluorescence and superparamagnetism, allowing their intracellular movements to be controlled using magnetic force and monitored using a fluorescent microscope. These features could lead to effective multifunctional drug-loaded magnetic NPs that would facilitate increased drug transport rates, mucus penetration, and antibiotic efficiency in biofilms.1 In this paper, we have used a two-step solution phase route to prepare cadmium-free core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe colloidal NPs with a spherical shape. Both individual components show good characteristics in terms of good chemical stability, biocompatibility, and low toxicity.

Bulk magnetite Fe3O4 is a mixed-valence 3d transition metal compound. It has an inverted cubic spinel structure, in which tetrahedral A sites contain one-third of the Fe ions as Fe3+, whereas octahedral B sites contain the remaining Fe ions, with equal numbers of Fe2+ and Fe3+ at B1 and B2 sites, respectively. Below 860 K, bulk magnetite is ferromagnetic, with the A-site magnetic moments aligned antiparallel to the B-site moments. Photoemission measurements clearly showed a gap of ∼0.14 eV in the spectra.5

ZnSe has a room temperature bulk bandgap of 2.7 eV (460 nm). ZnSe shells have long been used as a capping material for CdSe-core quantum dots (QDs) for surface passivation and biological labeling reagents. The organometallic synthesis of pure band-edge fluorescent ZnSe size-tunable QDs has been reported to result in highly luminescent UV-blue NP materials with bandgaps tunable between 2.8 and 3.4 eV and a quantum yield (QY) between 20% and 50%.6 More recently, Cozzoli et al. studied the shape and phase control of colloidal ZnSe NPs, where the as-prepared NPs exhibited distinguishable, shape-dependent optical properties in the UV-blue region.7 They observed that a red-shift of the bandgap in longer nanorods, or in general branched nanostructures with long rod sections, was generally accompanied by a significant decrease in the photoluminescence (PL) QY, which could be much lower than 1% for the branched structures.

Considering the characteristics of both individual materials described above, we note that in the simple approach of dimer particles, i.e., magnetite NPs attached to semiconductor QDs, such as ZnSe, PL emission from these multifunctional NPs should be expected to be strongly reduced due to the fact that magnetite is a semimetal with a much smaller bandgap than ZnSe, providing a leakage path to electrons excited in ZnSe. Similar problem should be expected with multifunctional NPs involving other semiconductor materials, such as CdSe with a bulk bandgap of ∼1.75 eV. However, it has been shown that multicomponent CdSe∕iron oxide core∕shell and dimer NPs can have good PL efficiency.4

All NPs described in this paper were synthesized using standard air-free procedures and commercially available reagents. The main reaction involves the nucleation and growth of nominally Fe3O4 NPs with a mean size of 7 nm and a size deviation of ∼1.2 nm. Briefly, following a modified procedure of Sun and Zeng,8 a solution of iron (III) acetylacetonate [Fe(acac)3, 2 mmol] in the presence of 1,2-hexadecanediol (10 mmol) and the surfactants oleic acid (6 mmol) and oleylamine (OLA, 6 mmol) in octyl ether (30 mL) was heated to reflux for 1 h. The obtained black-brown reference sample was labeled as Fe3O4 NPs and was used thereafter as a seed for the core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NP growth. In a typical procedure, modified after Zhong et al.,9 2 mL of the reference Fe3O4 NP sample in 1-octadecene (ODE, 0.05 g∕mL) was transferred into a reaction flask and mixed with 8.4 mmol of OLA and ODE (3 mL) at 120 °C in an inert Ar atmosphere under vigorous stirring. Subsequently, zinc oleate∕OLA∕ODE precursor (6.3 mL) was injected into the flask at 120 °C, and the solution was purged with Ar for 30 min. The solution was then heated up to 300 °C, and a selenium powder∕trioctyl phosphine∕ODE mixture (6 mL) was quickly injected. After 10 min at 300 °C, the final black-brown solution was cooled to room temperature. The obtained NPs were easily dispersed in nonpolar solvents such as hexane or chloroform. This sample was labeled as Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs. Alternatively, the light-yellow reference sample of ZnSe NPs with a mean size of 3.5 nm and a narrow size distribution (σ = 0.15) was synthesized following the modified procedure of Zhong et al.9 This reference sample was labeled as ZnSe NPs.

Figure 1 shows TEM images of Fe3O4 NPs [Fig. 1a] and core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs [Fig. 1b]. For the core∕shell NPs [Fig. 1b], the TEM images confirm the presence of regions of two different contrasts in the morphology of the majority of the particles. Roughly, the TEM signal at every projected point of a particle with a constant density is inversely proportional to Z2, with the thickness of the material being much less important.10 Therefore, the ZnSe particles, which have a higher Z (mean value of 32) compared with the Fe3O4 particles (mean value of Z ≈ 15.7), are imaged as darker objects. From the shape of the particles, we can infer that Fe3O4 NPs play the role of seeding sites for ZnSe growth, leading to the appearance of core∕shell spherical NPs. The size of the core∕shell NPs is estimated as a diameter of 6.8 ± 1.5 nm for Fe3O4 cores and a thickness of 3.8 ± 1.2 nm for ZnSe shells, which is in a good agreement with the diameter of 7 nm for the reference Fe3O4 sample. The elemental presence of Zn, Se, and Fe in the composition of the synthesized core∕shell NPs was verified by energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), as shown in Fig. 1c.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(Color online) TEM image of (a) reference Fe3O4 NPs and (b) core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs. The white circles indicate the Fe3O4 core (lighter) and ZnSe shell (darker). Inset: HR-TEM image of the core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs. (c) EDS spectrum measured for the core∕shell NPs. The Cu and C peaks originate from the holding grid.

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns (CuKα, λave = 0.15418 nm) for the ZnSe and Fe3O4 reference samples and for the core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe sample. The pattern for the ZnSe NPs [Fig. 2a] indicates that the NPs have a noncentrosymmetric cubic F43m symmetry, as expected from the bulk crystal structure. The peaks are broader for the smaller nanocrystals, but the pattern is centered on the bulk crystal lines, with no other features. For the Fe3O4 NPs [Fig. 2b], the broad and relatively low signal-to-noise ratio peaks corresponding to magnetite Fe3O4 (cubic phase, Fd3m) suggest a short crystalline order and an internal polycrystalline structure in the particles. Taking the full width at half-maximum of the most intense peak and using the Scherrer equation, we determined the lower bound on the average crystalline size to be 4.0 ± 0.9 nm for the ZnSe NPs and 4.7 ± 1.5 nm for the Fe3O4 NPs. While these values are in good agreement with the morphological information obtained from the TEM images for the ZnSe NPs, the agreement is not so good for the Fe3O4 NPs. The discrepancy in particle sizes obtained from TEM and XRD analyses has been frequently observed in this type of iron oxide compound synthesized by chemical methods, which is explained by polycrystalline structure of the compound.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Powder XRD patterns for the reference (a) ZnSe NPs, (b) Fe3O4 NPs, and (c) core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs. The positions of the ZnSe and Fe3O4 (coinciding with Fe2O3) lines taken from the International Centre for Diffraction Data database are indicated at the top of the figure.

It should be noted that the lattice parameters of the spinel structures, magnetite (Fe3O4) and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), are quite similar. Because the XRD lines of the NP samples are broadened, it is difficult to distinguish between magnetite and maghemite NPs by XRD.8, 11 However, the decomposition of Fe(acac)3 at high temperature has been claimed to lead to magnetite as the final product8; hence we ascribe a magnetite structure to our iron oxide NPs.

The Fe3O4∕ZnSe XRD pattern [Fig. 2c] shows a strong contribution from the peaks originating from ZnSe and a much weaker contribution from the broad peaks of magnetite. The detailed analysis of the peak positions and their relative intensities confirms a lattice expansion for the magnetite that has been estimated to be d511 = 1.64(3) Å, which is 2% larger than the corresponding value for the reference Fe3O4 sample [d511 = 1.60(5) Å], a tendency also observed in dimer Ag–Fe3O4 NPs.10 At the same time, no sign of lattice distortion is observed in the ZnSe-related peaks in the core∕shell NPs.

Figure 3a shows the T dependence of the magnetization for the reference Fe3O4 and Fe3O4∕ZnSe NP samples under zero-field-cooling (ZFC) and field-cooling (FC) conditions (H = 20 Oe). The samples were prepared in a powder form and encased in a gelatin capsule. The shape of the MZFC–FC magnetization curves for the reference magnetite sample is that typically observed for monodispersed weakly dipole–dipole interacting systems of randomly oriented NPs, where the MZFC curve shows a maximum at TM = 32 K and the MFC curve monotonically rises as T decreases. For the core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs, the MZFC curve clearly shows a shift to higher temperatures, with a maximum at TM = 45 K. Furthermore, the MFC monotonically rises as T decreases, and eventually saturates at temperatures below 41 K. The increase in TM from 32 K to 45 K corresponds to a slight enhancement of the magnetic anisotropy in the Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs. Moreover, the shift in the energy barrier EB to higher values for the core∕shell NPs should be critical in the superparamagnetic response at room temperature. According to the Néel relaxation model, τN = τ0exp(σ), where τ0 ∼ 10−10s, σ is the ratio of anisotropy energy to thermal energy (EB∕kBT), and kB is the Boltzmann constant. Therefore, the increase of ΔEBkB = 28·(45 K to 32 K) = 364 K corresponds to a threefold increase in the Néel relaxation time τN at room temperature. In good agreement with the M versus T experiments, the increase in the coercive field from 250 Oe to 390 Oe is obtained at T = 2 K (figure not shown), and both samples are superparamagnetic at room temperature, i.e., without coercivity or memory effects.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(Color online) (a) Magnetization against T under ZFC and FC conditions for the reference Fe3O4 and core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NP samples. (b) PLE and PL spectra measured at room temperature for the reference ZnSe and core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NP samples.

The photoluminescence excitation (PLE) and PL spectra measured at room temperature for the reference ZnSe and core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NP samples are compared in Fig. 3b. The core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs demonstrate a significant blue-shift in PL excitation∕emission spectra as compared to the reference ZnSe NPs. In particular, the PL excitation∕emission peaks are shifted from 377 nm to 325 nm and from 433 nm to 390 nm, respectively. The observed effect is primarily due to a change of shape between spherical ZnSe NPs and nanoshell ZnSe emitters in core∕shell NPs. Most dramatically, the QY dropped from 10% for the reference ZnSe NPs to 1% for the core∕shell NPs. We ascribe this effect to carrier leakage at the interface between Fe3O4 and ZnSe in the core∕shell NPs. Alternatively, the reduction of the QY in the ZnSe component of the core∕shell NPs may be explained by the change in its geometry from spherical to a nanoshell.

In summary, we report a new colloidal synthesis method to obtain core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs. By comparing the magnetic properties of the reference Fe3O4 NPs and the core∕shell Fe3O4∕ZnSe NPs, we have shown the enhancement of the energy barrier in the core∕shell composite NPs. This effect directly modifies the relaxation time, which is of fundamental interest to biomedical applications. The synthesized magnetic core∕shell NPs demonstrated PL activity. However, the multicomponent NPs showed a considerable reduction in QY from 10% to 1%, which could be attributed to the interface effects between the Fe3O4 and ZnSe components.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Grant No. 1R21HL092812-01A1 and by the NSF IGERT program on Integrating Nanotechnology with Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Grant No. DGE-0549500.

References

  1. Garcia-Contreras N. L. and Hickey A., Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 20, 317 (2003). 10.1615/CritRevTherDrugCarrierSyst.v20.i5.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sanvicens N. and Marco M. P., Trends Biotechnol. 26, 427 (2008). 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jarzyna P. A., Gianella A., Skajaa T., Knudsen G., Deddens L. H., Cormode D. P., Fayad Z. A., and Mulder W. J. M., Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 2, 138 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Louie A., Chem. Rev. 110, 3146 (2010). 10.1021/cr9003538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anisimov V. I., Elfimov I. S., Hamada N., and Terakura K., Phys. Rev. B 54, 4387 (1996). 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.4387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hines M. A. and Guyot-Sionnest P., J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3655 (1998). 10.1021/jp9810217 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cozzoli P. D., Manna L., Curri M. L., Kudera S., Giannini C., Striccoli M., and Agostiano A., Chem. Mater. 17, 1296 (2005). 10.1021/cm047874v [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sun S. H. and Zeng H., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 8204 (2002). 10.1021/ja026501x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhong X., Feng Y., Zhang Y., Gu Z., and Zou L., Nanotechnology 18, 385606 (2008). 10.1088/0957-4484/18/38/385606 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lopes G., Vargas J. M., Sharma S. K., Béron F., Pirota K. R., Knobel M., Rettori C., and Zysler R. D., J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 10148 (2010). 10.1021/jp102311u [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen W., Mørup S., Hansen M. F., Banert T., and Peuker U. A., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 2099 (2008). 10.1016/j.jmmm.2008.03.031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Applied Physics are provided here courtesy of American Institute of Physics

RESOURCES