Summary
Buruli ulcer disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans results in extensive destruction of skin and soft tissue and long-term functional disabilities that ultimately require surgery and rehabilitation. The disease is associated with aquatic and swampy environments with the mycobacterium occurring in biofilms, soil, aquatic insects, fish and wildlife however, the mode of transmission to humans remains an enigma. Current transmission ideas including bites from predatory water bugs and mosquitoes, do not explain satisfactorily the spasmodic disease distribution in human populations. Here we argue that Acanthamoeba species are the natural hosts of M. ulcerans and are mainly responsible for disease transmission because; (i) Acanthamoebae are known natural hosts of several microbial pathogens including M. marinum, M. avium and Legionella pneumophila, (ii) culture of slow-to-grow microbial pathogens hosted in nature by Acanthamoeba spp is enhanced when the media is seeded with the protozoa, (iii) acanthamoebae and M. ulcerans share similar bio-ecological and epidemiological settings, (iv) documented evidence that prior growth of L. pneumophila and M. avium in acanthamoebae influences entry mechanisms, intracellular growth and virulence in human monocytes, (v) Acanthamoeba spp also infect humans and cause diseases via routes of openings including broken skin and sites of trauma similar to M. ulcerans and (vi) M. ulcerans is rather a fastidious intracellular organism as recent analysis of the genome indicate. We argue further that temperature plays a significant role in transmission determining the fate of either the intracellular microbe or the host cells. Also, Acanthamoeba-pathogen association has a long evolutionary history because the same set of bacterial genes and gene products e.g. in L. pneumophila are required for survival in both mammalian and protozoan host cells. We suggest that the involvement of Acanthamoeba in the transmission of M. ulcerans to humans better explains the disease's epidemiology.
Introduction
Buruli ulcer (BU) caused by infection with Mycobacterium ulcerans is the third most common human mycobacterial infection after tuberculosis and leprosy. Infections can result in extensive destruction of skin and soft tissue and long-term functional disabilities, requiring plastic surgery and rehabilitation if not treated early. BU occurs near slow flowing rivers, streams, ponds, lakes and swamps in tropical and subtropical countries, and epidemics can occur after floods. This association with water bodies is undisputable but its transmission to humans is not exactly understood.1
Transmission
A classic study published in 2002 implicated predatory water bugs in the disease transmission.2 In this study water bugs fed on infected grubs successfully transmitted the bacillus from salivary glands to experimental animals which reinforced earlier hypothesis that aquatic insects were possible vectors of the disease.3 Since then several studies aided mainly by DNA technology, have found the mycobacterium in biofilms, soil, water bugs, insects, fish, amphibians and wildlife, but none offers any biological explanation for the persistence of M. ulcerans within these organisms.
The distribution of BU in human populations does not conform to any discernable pattern other than its clear association with aquatic environments, which compounds further the difficulty in delineating the mode of transmission. Interestingly because some BU patients remember antecedent trauma at sites of the body prior to the development of ulcers, bites from water bugs and mosquitoes therefore lead the field of potential vectors in transmission. Furthermore, most ulcers occur on the lower limbs so some investigators believe that the disease is acquired from contaminated soil. The current situation therefore is a mystifying state of affairs with investigators following ‘leads’ with attendant hypotheses of modes of transmission.4
In this article we posit that Acanthamoeba species are the natural hosts of M. ulcerans in the environment and that they are primarily responsible for the transmission and persistence of the disease.
M. ulcerans was considered by many as an extracellular organism because it occurs in central parts of lesions that are devoid of host cells although this view is changing with new evidence. Of relevance though, is the close relationship of M. ulcerans to M. marinum, and M. tuberculosis which are known intracellular parasites therefore it is odd that M. ulcerans should be an exception.
Additionally, M. ulcerans is slow growing, which laboratory cultures are enhanced significantly if the medium is seeded with Acanthamoeba, a characteristic also observed with slow-growing intracellular Francisella tularensis and Vibrio cholerae. These bacteria are known to survive and multiply in Acanthamoeba spp in nature, which raises the question; if Acanthamoeba enhances M. ulcerans growth in cultures why not also in the natural environment? It also hints at intracellular multiplication of M. ulcerans within Acanthamoeba spp. However a study that investigated M. ulcerans in disease-endemic environments did not find infected protozoa. 5 This study and Marsollier et al. 2 must have significantly influenced the research direction away from the involvement of Acanthamoeba species in transmission.
Intriguingly, it has been known for some time that a number of Mycobacterium species including M. marinum, M. smegmatis, M. avium and M. simiae live intracellularly in amoeba and recently Adekambi et al. 6 demonstrated the growth of 26 environmental Mycobacterium species from a variety of sources within A. polyphaga and survival inside cysts. Moreover, several reports of outbreaks of environmental mycobacterium infections have implicated acanthamoebae which should have drawn attention to their possible involvement in the transmission of M. ulcerans. What is more fascinating is the variety of attributes of various species and strains of Mycobacteria that are associated with Acanthamoeba spp; slow and rapid growing, extremes of high and low temperature resistant, chlorine tolerant, survival in low oxygen tension water, antibiotic resistant, survival in deionised water etc.7
Acanthamoeba spp. are recognized environmental hosts of several intracellular microbial pathogens including viruses, bacteria, yeast and protozoa e.g. Cryptosporidium parvus and Chlamydia, particularly as biological hosts for pathogen multiplication. They are among the most prevalent free-living protozoa in the environment; from soil, dust, air, natural and treated water, seawater, swimming pools, sewage, sediments, air-conditioning units, domestic tap water, to treatment plants, hospitals and dialysis units, eyewash stations to mammalian tissues, reptiles, amphibian, fish and vegetation. They occur predominantly at the water-air interface in biofilms, feeding on bacteria which support their growth. Acanthamoeba spp enter the human host by contact through ulcerated or broken skin or by aerosolization through lower respiratory tract and enter macrophages. 7 In humans it causes Acanthamoeba dermatitis, acanthamoeba keratitis after minimal trauma to the corneal epithelium, granulomatous amoebic encephalitis and Acanthamoeba pneumonitis in immune compromised individuals. The trophozoites acquire the bacteria in complex interactions which results in uptake by phagocytosis. Intriguingly some genera of bacteria are digested by Acanthamoeba spp while others are not.7 Undigested bacteria are confined in the phagosome of the amoeba within which they multiply and avoid killing by inhibiting the acidification of phagosome and subsequent lysosome fusion by processes that are still not well understood.
Legionella pneumophila and Francisella tularensis are two intracellular organisms hosted by Acanthamoebae that are particularly interesting, sharing several epidemiologic characteristics with M. ulcerans. Legionella pneumophila is commonly isolated from natural and man-made aquatic systems and infects and replicates within free-living amoebae in these environments. Francisella tularensis is also associated with natural water systems and also infects wildlife. These two bacteria are also slow-replicating organisms and we subscribe to the views of Stinear et al 8 that M. ulcerans has recently evolved from the generalist, more rapid-growing environmental M. marinum to become a niche-adapted specialist -a more fastidious intracellular organism. In brief, it is known that M. ulcerans survives and grows in both Acanthamoeba and macrophages, and that following proliferation phases within macrophages it lyses the infected host cell.
Studies have shown temperature to be the key determinant of the fate of either the bacteria or the host cells in the host-microbial pathogen relationships. The uptake and growth of Legionella within acanthamoeba is temperature sensitive.9
Acanthamoeba castellani would encyst at 15°C, up to 20°C digests L. pneumophila, at 25°C–35°C the bacteria replicate freely 10 and at 37°C and above lyses the protozoa. 11 A stable relationship exists between Odyssella thessalonicensis and amoebae at 20°C but at 30°C–37°C it lyses the amoeba.12 Parachlamydia acanthamoeba also survives within Acanthamoebae between 25°C – 30°C but lysis the host at 32°C – 37°C.13
The growth of bacteria within macrophages is also temperature-dependent, for example, temperature restriction applies to persistence of M. marinum in cultured mammalian cells. M. marinum would grow optimally at 25°C –33°C but poorly or not at all at 37°C and would cause only local lesions of cooler body surfaces usually of the extremities, but not the disseminated disease. However a strain adapted to optimal growth at 37°C causes disseminated systemic disease when injected in mouse 14 which is suggestive of lyses of host cells and release of the mycobacterium.
The intracellular survival of killing by phagosomelysosome fusion, growth and multiplication bacteria (dit Mycobacterium spp) in two different host cells Acanthamoeba and mammalian host cells are indicative of a long evolutionary history of association. We support this by the fact that Legionella spp. use of similar mechanisms, the same set of genes including mip, aspartate-²-semialdehyde (asd) and Dot/icm genes and gene products to parasitize both mammalian and protozoan host cells.9 Furthermore growth in A. castellanii enhances both Legionella spp. capacity to invade macrophages and intracellular replication similarly observed with M. avium.15 By inference the passage through Acanthamoeba primes bacteria for intracellular growth within mammalian cells, thus the natural selection of organisms that are better adapted to surviving in the hostile environment of phagocytic cells.
On the basis of the above we postulate that M. ulcerans is primarily an intracellular bacterium of both Acanthamoeba and human host cells and that it is transmitted to human principally by infected trophozoites through broken skins [Box 1]. In the environment and at ambient temperatures below 37°C (we suspect 29–33°C the temperature range for laboratory culture) it survives normally within Acanthamoeba and on human contact, and at normal body temperatures and above M. ulcerans lyses the protozoa.
We postulate further that M. ulcerans persists in unfavourable and harsh environment inside the cyst of Acanthamoeba.
We support this with the fact that Acanthamoeba cyst can remain viable for more than 20 years of desiccation 16 and that just as other bacteria M. ulcerans can survive within cysts. This long term viability within cysts may even explain why outbreaks of BU occur in endemic areas with floods, a return to favourable conditions for Acanthamoeba. Furthermore, activities near water bodies are risk factors which can be reduced by wearing protective clothing.1 Acanthamoeba spp are known natural hosts and vectors of microbial pathogens. Their aquatic habitat and ability to infect humans through broken skin, makes it a perfect intermediate host. In conclusion, we argue that Acanthamoeba spp should be considered prime suspect as a vector in BU transmission until proven ‘not guitly’.
References
- 1.World Health Organization, author. Buruli ulcer disease. 2007 Fact sheet No. 199. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Marsollier L, Robert R, Aubry J, Saint-Andre JP, Kouakou H, et al. Aquatic insects as a vector for Mycobacterium ulcerans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:4623–4628. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4623-4628.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Portaels F, Elsen P, Guimaraes-Peres A, Fonteyne PA, Meyers WM. Insects in the transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection (Buruli ulcer) Lancet. 1999;353:986. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05177-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marion E, Eyangoh S, Yeramian E, Doannio J, Landier J, et al. Seasonal and regional dynamics of M. ulcerans transmission in environmental context: deciphering the role of water bugs as hosts and vectors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010;4:e761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.00000761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eddyani M, De Jonckheere JF, Durnez L, Suykerbuyk P, Leirs H, Portaels F. Occurrence of free-living amoebae in communities of low and high endemicity for Buruli ulcer in southern Benin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:6547–6553. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01066-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Adékambi T, Salah SB, Khlif M, Raoult D, Drancourt M. Survival of environmental mycobacteria in Acanthamoeba polyphaga. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(9):5974–5981. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03075-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marciano-Cabral F, Cabral G. Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(2):273–307. doi: 10.1128/CMR.16.2.273-307.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Stinear TP, Seemann T, Pidot S, Frigui W, Reysset G, et al. Reductive evolution and niche adaptation inferred from the genome of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer. Genome Res. 2007;17:192–200. doi: 10.1101/gr.5942807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bartram J, Chartier Y, Lee JV, Pond K, Surman-Lee S, editors. Legionella and the Prevention of Legionellosis. World Health Organization; 2007. p. 276. ISBN 92 4156297 8. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ohno A, Kato N, Sakamoto R, Kimura S, Yamaguchi K. Temperature-dependent parasitic relationship between Legionella pneumophila and a free-living amoeba (Acanthamoeba castellanii) Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(14):4585–4588. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00083-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Anand CM, Skinner AR, Malic A, Kurtz JB. Interaction of L. pneumophila and a free living amoeba (Acanthamoeba palestinensis) J Hyg Camb. 1983;91:167–178. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400060174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Greub G, Raoult D. Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17(2):413–433. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.2.413-433.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Greub G, La Scola B, Raoult D. Parachlamydia acanthamoeba is endosymbiotic or lytic for Acanthamoeba polyphaga depending on the incubation temperature. In: Hechemy KE, AvsicZupanc T, Childs JE, Raoult DA, editors. International Conference on Rickettsiae and Rickettsial Diseases. Ljubljana, Slovenia: New York Academy of Sciences; 2002. pp. 628–634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Collins FM, Montalbine V, Morrison NE. Growth and immunogenicity of photochromogenic strains of mycobacteria in the footpads of normal mice. Infect Immun. 1975;11:1079–1087. doi: 10.1128/iai.11.5.1079-1087.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cirillo JD, Falkow S, Tompkins LS, Bermudez LE. Interaction of Mycobacterium avium with environmental amoebae enhances virulence. Infect Immun. 1997;65:3759–3767. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.9.3759-3767.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sriram R, Shoff M, Booton G, Fuerst P, Visvesvara GS. Survival of Acanthamoeba cysts after desiccation for more than 20 Years. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:4045–4048. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01903-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]