Abstract
Retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases and disease processes of the eye, including glaucoma. The protection of RGCs has been an important strategy for combating glaucoma, but little clinical success has been reported to date. One pathophysiological consequence of glaucoma is excessive extracellular glutamate subsequently leading to excitotoxicity in the retina. Endocannabinoids, such as the N-acylethanolamine (NAE), arachidonylethanolamine (NAE 20:4), exhibit neuroprotective properties in some models of neurodegenerative disease. The majority of NAEs, however, are not cannabinoids, and their physiological function is not clear. Here, we determined whether the noncannabinoid NAE, linoleoylethanolamine (NAE18:2), protects neurons in the RGC layer against glutamate excitotoxicity in ex-vivo retina cultures. Using a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP (2′-deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate) nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay, we determined that NAE18:2 reduces the number of apoptotic RGC layer neurons in response to glutamate and conclude that NAE18:2 is a neuroprotective compound with potential for treating glaucomatous retinopathy.
Keywords: neuroprotection, glutamate, calcium signaling, immunocytochemistry, eye, vision, glaucoma
The most widespread form of glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma, is characterized by increased intraocular pressure (IOP), optic disc cupping, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death and visual loss.1 Glaucoma is often preceded by elevated IOP followed by optic nerve damage, glial activation, oxidative stress, and excitotoxicity.2–6 Several studies have revealed that glutamate-induced RGC excitotoxicity occurs in animal models.5,7–11 As a result, RGC neuroprotection against excitotoxicity and other pathophysiological processes in glaucoma is considered a viable therapeutic strategy for glaucoma.12,13 Inhibition of NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors with the selective antagonists MK-801 or memantine can reduce excitotoxic RGC death in animal models of glaucoma.5,8,10,11,14 Previous work from our laboratory reveals that RGCs in postnatal mouse retinal explant cultures are susceptible to excitotoxicity.15
N-acylethanolamides (NAEs) are lipid-signaling molecules involved in numerous physiological functions in mammals, including cytoprotection. Some NAEs, and their precursors, are produced in rat brain in response to excitotoxicity, ischemia, and stroke,16–21 suggesting their possible role in cytoprotection.
Unlike the well characterized endocannabinoid NAE 20:4, the molecular target of some NAE species, such as palmitoylethanolamine (NAE 16:0) and NAE 18:2, is not known. Strong evidence for noncannabinoid NAE-mediated cytoprotection comes from multiple studies. For example, NAE 16:0 protects the hippocampal cell line, HT22, from oxidative stress, and it activates the neuroprotective Akt and ERK1/2 pathways.22 NAE16:0 administration prior to or after middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats leads to significant reduction in stroke severity.23
Many different NAEs are produced in the retina.24 In addition, receptors for NAEs and enzymes involved in NAE metabolism are expressed in the retina, suggesting that NAEs may provide protection of retinal neurons in diseases of the eye.25–30 For example, activation of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) with a synthetic CB1 receptor agonist protects retina neurons from excitotoxicity and oxidative stress.31
Here, we report that the naturally occurring NAE 18:2 protects neurons in the RGC layer against glutamate excitotoxicity in organotypic retina cultures. We determined that NAE 18:2 reduced the number of apoptotic RGC layer neurons in response to glutamate by TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP [2′-deoxyuridine 5′-triphosphate] nick-end labeling) histochemistry, indicating that NAE 18:2 may be a neuroprotective compound with potential for treating acute and chronic RGC damage as seen in retinal ischemia and glaucomatous retinopathy, respectively.
Materials and methods
Animals and tissue culture
All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with National Institutes of Health (NIH) and institutional regulations on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Whole retinas were isolated from C57BL/6 mice and maintained as organotypic cultures as described elsewhere.15 In brief, C57BL/6 mice (P10–P14) were euthanized by overexposure to CO2 and decapitated. Freshly enucleated eyes were rinsed in cold Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) (HyClone Inc, Logan, UT) under sterile conditions. The retinas were removed from the eyes, and incisions were introduced in the shape of a Maltese cross to flatten the retina tissue. Retinas were placed onto poly-D-lysine/laminin-coated glass coverslips (BD Bioscience, Bedford, MA) with the ganglion cell layer facing the coverslip. The retina was permitted to attach to the coverslip for 30 minutes at room temperature in 20 μL of culture medium (Neurobasal-A Medium, Gibco, Carlsbad, CA with 2% DHS [donor horse sera], B27 supplement, and penicillin-streptomycin-fungizone). Retinas were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 7 days in vitro, and culture media was replaced every other day.
Experimental groups
Retinas from C57Bl/6 mice were treated with NAE 18:2 (or ethanol vehicle) over a range of physiologically relevant concentrations (20–120 μM) for 6 hours prior to addition of and during exposure to 100 μM glutamate for 24 hours (30 hour NAE 18:2 exposure total). The 6-hour NAE 18:2 pretreatment was selected because previous studies with other NAEs indicate that a 6-hour pretreatment protects a neuronal cell line against oxidative stress.22 Additionally, retinas received NAE 18:2 treatment (or ethanol vehicle) 24 hours prior to addition of and during exposure to a 24-hour glutamate treatment or at the same time as glutamate treatment for 24 hours (co-treatment paradigm; 48-hour NAE 18:2 exposure total) in order to determine a therapeutic window.
Cell viability measurements
Identification of neurons in the RGC layer in explants was determined using cell specific immunohistochemistry, and loss of neurons in the RGC layer was assessed using the TUNEL assay as described elsewhere.15,32 Retinas attached to coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and subjected to the TUNEL assay to detect apoptotic cells as described elsewhere.15 Coverslips were mounted onto microscope slides using Prolong Gold antifade mounting medium containing DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) to visualize nuclei. Fluorescent and differential interference contrast (DIC) images were acquired with an epifluorescence microscope (Olympus IX70, Japan) using digital microphotography (Hamamatsu, Japan), and analysis of images was conducted using SimplePCI (Compix Inc, Image Systems, Sewickley, PA). Images from four 8000 μM2 regions from each condition were used for analysis. Background fluorescence of vehicle control images was subtracted from micrographs to better visualize TUNEL fluorescence. TUNEL-positive RGCs were manually counted in each micrograph, and data were graphed with standard errors in Microsoft Excel. Statistical analysis between treatment groups was determined using a one-way analysis of variance (GraphPad Prism 5.01).
Results
Evaluation of glutamate and NAE 18:2 on the viability of RGC layer neurons in retinal explant cultures
To determine whether NAE 18:2 alone had an effect on the viability of neurons in the RGC layer, retina explants were treated with NAE 18:2 (or ethanol vehicle) for 24 hours followed by TUNEL assay to detect apoptosis (Figure 1). Exposure of explants to NAE 18:2 did not result in apoptotic retinal cells compared with the vehicle control (Figure 1). To verify glutamate sensitivity of RGC layer neurons, explants were exposed to glutamate (100 μM) for 24 hours. Glutamate exposure led to significant RGC apoptosis as determined by the TUNEL assay (Figure 1).
NAE 18:2 protects RGC layer neurons against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity
Retinas were treated 6 hours prior to glutamate insult with 20–120 μM NAE 18:2 (along with vehicle) to determine whether physiological concentrations affect neuronal viability. Previous studies with a structurally similar NAE reveal that a 6-hour preincubation is neuroprotective, thus providing a rationale for a 6-hour NAE 18:2 preincubation.22 Preincubation with NAE 18:2, at 6 hours prior to glutamate exposure resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the number of TUNEL-labeled (apoptotic) RGCs (Figure 2). Retinas exposed to NAE 18:2 at concentrations above 40 μM exhibit dramatically reduced TUNEL labeling of neurons in the RGC layer (Figure 2). An NAE 18:2 concentration of 40 μM approximates a high physiological concentration, thus avoiding the need for potentially toxic supra-physiological exposures. These results suggest that 6-hour NAE 18:2 pretreatment dose-dependently increases neuronal viability after 100 μM glutamate-mediated induction of apoptosis of neurons in the RGC layer.
NAE 18:2 preincubation is critical for its neuroprotective effect
To further determine the requirement for NAE 18:2 preincubation in RGC layer neuroprotection, retina explants were pretreated with 40 μM NAE 18:2 at 24 hours prior to and subsequently during glutamate exposure (24-hour pretreatment) or administered at the same time as glutamate treatment (no preincubation). Retina explants pretreated with NAE 18:2 for 24 hours prior to glutamate insult exhibited significantly reduced RGC apoptosis, whereas retinas co-treated with NAE 18:2 and glutamate exhibited no protection of neurons in the RGC layer against glutamate-induced apoptosis (Figure 3). There was, however, a trend toward a reduction in neuronal apoptotis when retinas were co-treated with 80 μM NAE 18:2 and glutamate (Figure 3B).
Discussion
Here, we show that NAE 18:2 protects RGC layer neurons from glutamate-induced apoptosis in retinal explant cultures. We determined that NAE 18:2 treatment must precede glutamate exposure to elicit its neuroprotective effect. The highly significant, dose-dependent reduction of glutamate-induced death of RGC layer neurons by treatment with NAE 18:2 reveals a neuroprotective function for NAEs that do not bind to cannabinoid receptors. These results provide a rationale for the use of NAEs as potential therapeutic compounds in acute and chronic neurodegenerative diseases of the retina. Whether or not excitotoxic RGC death occurs in glaucoma has been controversial.33,34 Here, we observed RGC layer neuron death at glutamate concentrations consistent with activation of ionotropic glutamate receptors and not delayed oxidative glutamate toxicity due to glutathione depletion.
NAEs, as well as the receptors and enzymes involved in NAE function, are present in the retina.24–30 Human eye samples from patients with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration exhibit elevated levels of NAEs, suggesting that they may be involved in an endogenous protective response to eye injury.35 Interestingly, high IOP-induced ischemia in rats results in reduced anandamide (NAE 20:4) levels due to elevated fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) expression subsequently contributing to RGC loss.36 This suggests that endocannabinoid NAEs are neuroprotective in the ischemic retina. This is further evidenced by improved RGC viability in the ischemic retina following pharmacological inhibition of FAAH.36 Altogether, data presented here and from others provide evidence for a neuroprotective role for NAEs against diseases of the retina such as glaucoma.
The neuroprotective mechanism of action of NAE 18:2 is not clear at this time. Others have proposed that NAE 18:2 is a vanilloid receptor 1 (VR1) agonist or that it reduces the degradation of the endocannabinoid NAE, NAE 20:4, by FAAH.37,38 NAE 20:4 neuroprotection is mediated primarily through activation of CB1 and subsequent downregulation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production and protein kinase A (PKA) activation.39,40 In addition, CB1 activation can inhibit voltage gated calcium channels, activate inward rectifying potassium channels, and activate various protein kinases.41–45 Most NAEs, including NAE 16:0 and NAE 18:2, do not activate cannabinoid receptors.46 Activation of VR1 leads to apoptosis in a variety of cell culture model systems, thus making VR1 activation an unlikely target for NAE 18:2 protective effects.47,48
We previously determined that, in the HT-22 neuronal cell line, NAE16:0 is neuroprotective against oxidative stress by a mechanism independent of cannabinoid receptor involvement and correlating with Akt and ERK1/2 activation.22 Furthermore, NAE 16:0 administration reduces infarct volume and improves behavioral deficits independent of CB1 or VR1 in a rat model of ischemic stroke.23 CB1 is expressed in vascular smooth muscles of cerebral arteries.49 Peripheral CB1 activation by systemic administration of NAE 20:4 dilates cerebral arteries.50 Neuroprotection afforded by NAE 16:0 against ischemic stroke is not blocked by inhibitors of CB1 or VR1, suggesting that the protection is not due to cerebral vasodilation.23 The retina explant model used in the present study excludes any vasodilatative or hemodynamic mechanism of action for the neuroprotective effect of NAE 18:2 in the retina. The mechanism of action for NAE 18:2 neuroprotection is likely a direct effect on RGCs similar to that previously observed with other noncannabinoid NAEs in a neuronal cell line model.22
Altogether, the data presented here and from previous studies indicate that neuroprotection by some NAEs is independent of cannabinoid receptor activation and is mediated by an unknown mechanism. The diversity of NAEs and their potential functional targets may provide a variety of new therapeutic targets for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases, including glaucomatous retinopathy.
Acknowledgments
Grant support/acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by grants EY014227 from NIH/NEI, RR022570, RR027093 from NIH/NCRR and AG010485, AG022550 and AG027956 from NIH/NIA, the Vision Research Foundation of Kansas City and the Felix and Carmen Sabates Missouri Endowed Chair in Vision Research (P.K.). We thank Margaret, Richard and Sara Koulen for generous support and encouragement.
Footnotes
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
- 1.Weinreb RN, Khaw PT. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Lancet. 2004;363:1711–1720. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16257-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yuan L, Neufeld AH. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha: a potentially neurodestructive cytokine produced by glia in the human glaucomatous optic nerve head. Glia. 2000;32:42–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moreno MC, Campanelli J, Sande P, Sánez DA, Keller Sarmiento MI, Rosenstein RE. Retinal oxidative stress induced by high intraocular pressure. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37:803–812. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Seki M, Lipton SA. Targeting excitotoxic/free radical signaling pathways for therapeutic intervention in glaucoma. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:495–510. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)01134-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hare WA, Wheeler L. Experimental glutamatergic excitotoxicity in rabbit retinal ganglion cells: block by memantine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2940–2948. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Son JL, Soto I, Oglesby E, et al. Glaucomatous optic nerve injury involves early astrocyte reactivity and late oligodendrocyte loss. Glia. 2010;58:780–789. doi: 10.1002/glia.20962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hahn JS, Aizenman E, Lipton SA. Central mammalian neurons normally resistant to glutamate toxicity are made sensitive by elevated extracellular Ca2+: toxicity is blocked by the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist MK-801. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:6556–6560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.17.6556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vorwerk CK, Lipton SA, Zurakowski D, Hyman BT, Sabel BA, Dreyer EB. Chronic low-dose glutamate is toxic to retinal ganglion cells. Toxicity blocked by memantine. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1618–1624. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Otori Y, Wei JY, Barnstable CJ. Neurotoxic effects of low doses of glutamate on purified rat retinal ganglion cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:972–981. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.WoldeMussie E, Yoles E, Schwartz M, Ruiz G, Wheeler LA. Neuroprotective effect of memantine in different retinal injury models in rats. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:474–480. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200212000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Manabe S, Gu Z, Lipton SA. Activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 via neuronal nitric oxide synthase contributes to NMDA-induced retinal ganglion cell death. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4747–4753. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chidlow G, Wood JP, Casson RJ. Pharmacological neuroprotection for glaucoma. Drugs. 2007;67:725–759. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200767050-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Osborne NN. Recent clinical findings with memantine should not mean that the idea of neuroprotection in glaucoma is abandoned. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87:450–454. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01459.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sun Q, Ooi VE, Chan SO. N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced excitotoxicity in adult rat retina is antagonized by single systemic injection of MK-801. Exp Brain Res. 2001;138:37–45. doi: 10.1007/s002210100688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xin H, Yannazzo JA, Duncan RS, Gregg EV, Singh M, Koulen P. A novel organotypic culture model of the postnatal mouse retina allows the study of glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;159:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Epps DE, Schmid PC, Natarajan V, Schmid HH. N-Acylethanolamine accumulation in infarcted myocardium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1979;90:628–633. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(79)91281-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Epps DE, Natarajan V, Schmid PC, Schmid HO. Accumulation of N-acylethanolamine glycerophospholipids in infarcted myocardium. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;618:420–430. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(80)90260-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Natarajan V, Schmid PC, Schmid HH. N-acylethanolamine phospholipid metabolism in normal and ischemic rat brain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986;878:32–41. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(86)90341-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hansen HS, Lauritzen L, Strand AM, Moesgaard B, Frandsen A. Glutamate stimulates the formation of N-acylphosphatidylethanolamine and N-acylethanolamine in cortical neurons in culture. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1258:303–308. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(95)00134-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moesgaard B, Jaroszewski JW, Hansen HS. Accumulation of N-acyl-ethanolamine phospholipids in rat brains during post-decapitative ischemia: a 31p NMR study. J Lipid Res. 1999;40:515–521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schäbitz WR, Giuffrida A, Berger C, et al. Release of fatty acid amides in a patient with hemispheric stroke: a microdialysis study. Stroke. 2002;33:2112–2114. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000023491.63693.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Duncan RS, Chapman KD, Koulen P. The neuroprotective properties of palmitoylethanolamine against oxidative stress in a neuronal cell line. Mol Neurodegener. 2009;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1750-1326-4-50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Garg P, Duncan RS, Kaja S, Koulen P. Intracellular mechanisms of N-acylethanolamine-mediated neuroprotection in a rat model of stroke. Neuroscience. 2010;166:252–262. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.11.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen J, Matias I, Dinh T, et al. Finding of endocannabinoids in human eye tissues: implications for glaucoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;330:1062–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Straiker AJ, Maguire G, Mackie K, Lindsey J. Localization of cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the human anterior eye and retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2442–2448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yazulla S, Studholme KM, McIntosh HH, Deutsch DG. Immunocytochemical localization of cannabinoid CB1 receptor and fatty acid amide hydrolase in rat retina. J Comp Neurol. 1999;415:80–90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19991206)415:1<80::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lu Q, Straiker A, Lu Q, Maguire G. Expression of CB2 cannabinoid receptor mRNA in adult rat retina. Vis Neurosci. 2000;17:91–95. doi: 10.1017/s0952523800171093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Glaser ST, Deutsch DG, Studholme KM, Zimov S, Yazulla S. Endocannabinoids in the intact retina: 3 H-anandamide uptake, fatty acid amide hydrolase immunoreactivity and hydrolysis of anandamide. Vis Neurosci. 2005;22:693–705. doi: 10.1017/S0952523805226020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zimov S, Yazulla S. Vanilloid receptor 1 (TRPV1/VR1) co-localizes with fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) in retinal amacrine cells. Vis Neurosci. 2007;24:581–591. doi: 10.1017/S095252380707054X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hu SS, Arnold A, Hutchens JM, Radicke J, et al. Architecture of cannabinoid signaling in mouse retina. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518:3848–3866. doi: 10.1002/cne.22429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.El-Remessy AB, Khalil IE, Matragoon S, et al. Neuroprotective effect of (-) Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol in N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced retinal neurotoxicity: involvement of peroxynitrite. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:1997–2008. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63558-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mafe OA, Gregg EV, Medina-Ortiz WE, Koulen P. Localization of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in mouse retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci Res. 2006;84:1750–1758. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ullian EM, Barkis WB, Chen S, Diamond JS, Barres BA. Invulnerability of retinal ganglion cells to NMDA excitotoxicity. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004;26:544–557. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wamsley S, Gabelt BT, Dahl DB, et al. Vitreous glutamate concentration and axon loss in monkeys with experimental glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:64–70. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.1.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Matias I, Wang JW, Moriello AS, Nieves A, Woodward DF, Di Marzo V. Changes in endocannabinoid and palmitoylethanolamide levels in eye tissues of patients with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2006;75:413–418. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2006.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nucci C, Gasperi V, Tartaglione R, et al. Involvement of the endocannabinoid system in retinal damage after high intraocular pressure-induced ischemia in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2997–3004. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jonsson KO, Vandevoorde S, Lambert DM, Tiger G, Fowler CJ. Effects of homologues and analogues of palmitoylethanolamide upon the inactivation of the endocannabinoid anandamide. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;133:1263–1275. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Movahed P, Jönsson BA, Birnir B, et al. Endogenous unsaturated C18 N-acylethanolamines are vanilloid receptor (TRPV1) agonists. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:38496–38504. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M507429200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Howlett AC, Qualy JM, Khachatrian LL. Involvement of Gi in the inhibition of adenylate cyclase by cannabimimetic drugs. Mol Pharmacol. 1986;29:307–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Devane WA, Dysarz FA, 3rd, Johnson MR, Melvin LS, Howlett AC. Determination and characterization of a cannabinoid receptor in rat brain. Mol Pharmacol. 1988;34:605–613. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mackie K, Hille B. Cannabinoids inhibit N-type calcium channels in neuroblastoma-glioma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:3825–3829. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.9.3825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bouaboula M, Poinot-Chazel C, Bourrié B, et al. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases by stimulation of the central cannabinoid receptor CB1. Biochem J. 1995;312:637–641. doi: 10.1042/bj3120637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Henry DJ, Chavkin C. Activation of inwardly rectifying potassium channels (GIRK1) by co-expressed rat brain cannabinoid receptors in Xenopus oocytes. Neurosci Lett. 1995;186:91–94. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11289-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Derkinderen P, Toutant M, Burgaya F, et al. Regulation of a neuronal form of focal adhesion kinase by anandamide. Science. 1996;273:1719–1722. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5282.1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Derkinderen P, Ledent C, Parmentier M, Girault JA. Cannabinoids activate p38 mitogen-activated protein kinases through CB1 receptors in hippocampus. J Neurochem. 2001;77:957–960. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00333.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lambert DM, Di Marzo V. The palmitoylethanolamide and oleamide enigmas: are these two fatty acid amides cannabimimetic? Curr Med Chem. 1999;6:757–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Maccarrone M, Lorenzon T, Bari M, Melino G, Finazzi-Agro A. Anandamide induces apoptosis in human cells via vanilloid receptors. Evidence for a protective role of cannabinoid receptors. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:31938–31945. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005722200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Shirakawa H, Yamaoka T, Sanpei K, Sasaoka H, Nakagawa T, Kaneko S. TRPV1 stimulation triggers apoptotic cell death of rat cortical neurons. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;377:1211–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.10.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ashton JC, Appleton I, Darlington CL, Smith PF. Immunohistochemical localization of cerebrovascular cannabinoid CB1 receptor protein. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2004;44:517–519. doi: 10.1097/00005344-200411000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wagner JA, Járai Z, Bátkai S, Kunos G. Hemodynamic effects of cannabinoids: coronary and cerebral vasodilation mediated by cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;423:203–210. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01112-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]