Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2003 Dec;41(12):5838. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5838.2003

Latin Grammar Headaches

Enrico Tortoli 1,*
PMCID: PMC309037  PMID: 14662999

The use of the English language for the exchange of scientific information has greatly contributed to the advancement of sciences in the last century. Latin, for many centuries the language of science, is unable to compete with a worldwide and living language such as English. However, the use of Latin in the binomial nomenclature introduced by C. von Linné retains its standing in taxonomy.

For those of us who studied, for many years and with difficulty, Latin at school, it has been difficult to accept the English pronunciation of Latin names of genera and species and the creation of doubtful Latin terms like “longbeachae.” What cannot be tolerated, however, is grammatical mistakes. I refer here to the name Mycobacterium visibilis proposed in the very interesting paper by Appleyard and Clark (1). The neuter form “visibile” should be used in conjunction with “Mycobacterium.”

REFERENCE

  • 1.Appleyard, G. D., and E. G. Clark. 2002. Histologic and genotypic characterization of a novel Mycobacterium species found in three cats. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2425-2430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec;41(12):5838.

Authors' Reply

G D Appleyard 1,*, E G Clark 1

According to the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria, Rule 65 (2), “[g]eneric or subgeneric names which are modern compounds from two or more Latin or Greek words take the gender of the last component of the compound word” (2). The name we proposed for a novel mycobacterium (1) does not follow this rule, and we thank Dr. E. Tortoli for kindly pointing out the error. In the future, we shall use the neuter form “visibile,” as suggested.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Appleyard, G. D., and E. G. Clark. 2002. Histologic and genotypic characterization of a novel Mycobacterium species found in three cats. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2425-2430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lapage, S. P., P. H. A. Sneath, E. F. Lessel, V. B. D. Skerman, H. P. R. Seeliger, and W. A. Clark (ed.). 1992. International code of nomenclature of bacteria (1990 revision), p. 47. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES