Skip to main content
BMC Neuroscience logoLink to BMC Neuroscience
. 2010 Jul 20;11(Suppl 1):P108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-11-S1-P108

Random wiring limits the development of functional structure in large recurrent neuronal networks

Susanne Kunkel 1,2,, Markus Diesmann 2,3,4, Abigail Morrison 1,2
PMCID: PMC3090808

Spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP) has traditionally been of great interest to theoreticians, as it seems to provide an answer to the question of how the brain can develop functional structure in response to repeated stimuli. However, despite this high level of interest, convincing demonstrations of this capacity in large, initially random networks have not been forthcoming. Such demonstrations as there are typically rely on constraining the problem artificially. Techniques include employing additional pruning mechanisms or STDP rules that enhance symmetry breaking, simulating networks with low connectivity that magnify competition between synapses, or combinations of the above (see, e.g. [1-3]).

Here, we describe a theory for the stimulus-driven development of feed-forward structures in random networks. The theory explains why the emergence of such structures does not take place in unconstrained systems [4] and enables us to identify candidate biologically motivated adaptations to the balanced random network model that might facilitate it. Finally, we investigate these candidate adaptations in large-scale simulations.

Acknowledgments

Partially supported by the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology, the Next-Generation Supercomputer Project of MEXT, EU Grant 15879 (FACETS), DIP F1.2, and BMBF Grant 01GQ0420 to BCCN Freiburg. Access to HPC provided by JUGENE-Grant JINB33. All network simulations were carried out with NEST (http://www.nest-initiative.org).

References

  1. Izhikevich EM. Polychronization: computation with spikes. Neural Comput. 2006;18:245–282. doi: 10.1162/089976606775093882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jun JK, Jin DZ. Development of neural circuitry for precise temporal sequences through spontaneous activity, axon remodeling, and synaptic plasticity. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(1):e723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu JK, Buonomano DV. Embedding multiple trajectories in simulated recurrent neural networks in a self-organizing manner. J Neurosci. 2009;29(42):13172–81. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2358-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morrison A, Aertsen A, Diesmann. Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in balanced random networks. Neural Comput. 2007;19(6):1437–67. doi: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.6.1437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES