Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1993 Apr 11;21(7):1541–1548. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.7.1541

The effects of terminal heterologies on gene targeting by insertion vectors in embryonic stem cells.

S Kumar 1, J P Simons 1
PMCID: PMC309360  PMID: 8386835

Abstract

We have examined the effects of placing nonhomologous DNA on the ends of an insertion-type gene targeting vector. The presence of terminal heterologies was found to be compatible with insertion targeting, and the terminal heterologies were efficiently removed. Terminal heterologies reduced the frequency of gene targeting to variable extents. The degree of inhibition of targeting was dependent on the length and the position of the heterology: 2.1kb heterologous sequences were more inhibitory than shorter regions of heterology, and heterology placed on the end of the long (4.8kb) arm of homology was more inhibitory than heterology positioned on the end of the short (0.8kb) arm. When heterology was placed on both arms of the targeting vector the targeting efficiencies were similar to or higher than when heterology was present on the long arm only. These results suggest that terminal sequences are removed simultaneously from both ends of targeting vectors. The removal of terminal sequences probably occurs by exonucleolytic degradation of both strands at each end, and removal of at least one of the strands is intimately coupled with the process of homologous recombination. These findings have implications for the design of gene targeting vectors.

Full text

PDF
1541

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bollag R. J., Liskay R. M. Conservative intrachromosomal recombination between inverted repeats in mouse cells: association between reciprocal exchange and gene conversion. Genetics. 1988 May;119(1):161–169. doi: 10.1093/genetics/119.1.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bollag R. J., Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:199–225. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.001215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley A., Hasty P., Davis A., Ramirez-Solis R. Modifying the mouse: design and desire. Biotechnology (N Y) 1992 May;10(5):534–539. doi: 10.1038/nbt0592-534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Capecchi M. R. Altering the genome by homologous recombination. Science. 1989 Jun 16;244(4910):1288–1292. doi: 10.1126/science.2660260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Church G. M., Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):1991–1995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fishel R., Derbyshire M. K., Moore S. P., Young C. S. Biochemical studies of homologous and nonhomologous recombination in human cells. Biochimie. 1991 Feb-Mar;73(2-3):257–267. doi: 10.1016/0300-9084(91)90211-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Folger K. R., Wong E. A., Wahl G., Capecchi M. R. Patterns of integration of DNA microinjected into cultured mammalian cells: evidence for homologous recombination between injected plasmid DNA molecules. Mol Cell Biol. 1982 Nov;2(11):1372–1387. doi: 10.1128/mcb.2.11.1372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hasty P., Ramírez-Solis R., Krumlauf R., Bradley A. Introduction of a subtle mutation into the Hox-2.6 locus in embryonic stem cells. Nature. 1991 Mar 21;350(6315):243–246. doi: 10.1038/350243a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hasty P., Rivera-Pérez J., Bradley A. The role and fate of DNA ends for homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1992 Jun;12(6):2464–2474. doi: 10.1128/mcb.12.6.2464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hasty P., Rivera-Pérez J., Chang C., Bradley A. Target frequency and integration pattern for insertion and replacement vectors in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4509–4517. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hsieh P., Meyn M. S., Camerini-Otero R. D. Partial purification and characterization of a recombinase from human cells. Cell. 1986 Mar 28;44(6):885–894. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90011-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Koller B. H., Kim H. S., Latour A. M., Brigman K., Boucher R. C., Jr, Scambler P., Wainwright B., Smithies O. Toward an animal model of cystic fibrosis: targeted interruption of exon 10 of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene in embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10730–10734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koller B. H., Smithies O. Altering genes in animals by gene targeting. Annu Rev Immunol. 1992;10:705–730. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.10.040192.003421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Konecki D. S., Brennand J., Fuscoe J. C., Caskey C. T., Chinault A. C. Hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase genes of mouse and Chinese hamster: construction and sequence analysis of cDNA recombinants. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982 Nov 11;10(21):6763–6775. doi: 10.1093/nar/10.21.6763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Le Mouellic H., Lallemand Y., Brûlet P. Homeosis in the mouse induced by a null mutation in the Hox-3.1 gene. Cell. 1992 Apr 17;69(2):251–264. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90406-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin F. L., Sperle K., Sternberg N. Intermolecular recombination between DNAs introduced into mouse L cells is mediated by a nonconservative pathway that leads to crossover products. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Jan;10(1):103–112. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin F. L., Sperle K., Sternberg N. Model for homologous recombination during transfer of DNA into mouse L cells: role for DNA ends in the recombination process. Mol Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;4(6):1020–1034. doi: 10.1128/mcb.4.6.1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Macleod D., Lovell-Badge R., Jones S., Jackson I. A promoter trap in embryonic stem (ES) cells selects for integration of DNA into CpG islands. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jan 11;19(1):17–23. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mansour S. L., Thomas K. R., Capecchi M. R. Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes. Nature. 1988 Nov 24;336(6197):348–352. doi: 10.1038/336348a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Melton D. W., Konecki D. S., Brennand J., Caskey C. T. Structure, expression, and mutation of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr;81(7):2147–2151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.7.2147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mombaerts P., Clarke A. R., Hooper M. L., Tonegawa S. Creation of a large genomic deletion at the T-cell antigen receptor beta-subunit locus in mouse embryonic stem cells by gene targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Apr 15;88(8):3084–3087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pennington S. L., Wilson J. H. Gene targeting in Chinese hamster ovary cells is conservative. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Nov 1;88(21):9498–9502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Piedrahita J. A., Zhang S. H., Hagaman J. R., Oliver P. M., Maeda N. Generation of mice carrying a mutant apolipoprotein E gene inactivated by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 15;89(10):4471–4475. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roth D. B., Porter T. N., Wilson J. H. Mechanisms of nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1985 Oct;5(10):2599–2607. doi: 10.1128/mcb.5.10.2599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Seidman M. M. Intermolecular homologous recombination between transfected sequences in mammalian cells is primarily nonconservative. Mol Cell Biol. 1987 Oct;7(10):3561–3565. doi: 10.1128/mcb.7.10.3561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith A. G., Heath J. K., Donaldson D. D., Wong G. G., Moreau J., Stahl M., Rogers D. Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature. 1988 Dec 15;336(6200):688–690. doi: 10.1038/336688a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun H., Treco D., Szostak J. W. Extensive 3'-overhanging, single-stranded DNA associated with the meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 recombination initiation site. Cell. 1991 Mar 22;64(6):1155–1161. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90270-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Szostak J. W., Orr-Weaver T. L., Rothstein R. J., Stahl F. W. The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell. 1983 May;33(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90331-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Thomas K. R., Capecchi M. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell. 1987 Nov 6;51(3):503–512. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Thomas K. R., Folger K. R., Capecchi M. R. High frequency targeting of genes to specific sites in the mammalian genome. Cell. 1986 Feb 14;44(3):419–428. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Toneguzzo F., Keating A., Glynn S., McDonald K. Electric field-mediated gene transfer: characterization of DNA transfer and patterns of integration in lymphoid cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Jun 24;16(12):5515–5532. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.12.5515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tybulewicz V. L., Crawford C. E., Jackson P. K., Bronson R. T., Mulligan R. C. Neonatal lethality and lymphopenia in mice with a homozygous disruption of the c-abl proto-oncogene. Cell. 1991 Jun 28;65(7):1153–1163. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90011-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Valancius V., Smithies O. Double-strand gap repair in a mammalian gene targeting reaction. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Sep;11(9):4389–4397. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.9.4389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Valancius V., Smithies O. Testing an "in-out" targeting procedure for making subtle genomic modifications in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1991 Mar;11(3):1402–1408. doi: 10.1128/mcb.11.3.1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Waldman A. S., Liskay R. M. Differential effects of base-pair mismatch on intrachromosomal versus extrachromosomal recombination in mouse cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Aug;84(15):5340–5344. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.15.5340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yenofsky R. L., Fine M., Pellow J. W. A mutant neomycin phosphotransferase II gene reduces the resistance of transformants to antibiotic selection pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May;87(9):3435–3439. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zenvirth D., Arbel T., Sherman A., Goldway M., Klein S., Simchen G. Multiple sites for double-strand breaks in whole meiotic chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1992 Sep;11(9):3441–3447. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05423.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES