Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nucleic Acids Research logoLink to Nucleic Acids Research
. 1993 May 11;21(9):2173–2178. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.9.2173

Prediction of alternative RNA secondary structures based on fluctuating thermodynamic parameters.

S Y Le 1, J H Chen 1, J V Maizel Jr 1
PMCID: PMC309481  PMID: 7684834

Abstract

In this paper we present a new method for predicting a set of RNA secondary structures that are thermodynamically favored in RNA folding simulations. This method uses a large number of 'simulated energy rules' (SER) generated by perturbing the free energy parameters derived experimentally within the range of the experimental errors. The structure with the lowest free energy is computed for each SER. Structural comparisons are used to avoid multiple generation of similar structures. Computed structures are evaluated using the energy distribution of the lowest free energy structures derived in the simulation. Predicted be graphically displayed with their occurring frequencies in the simulation by dot-plot representations. On average, about 90% of phylogenetic helixes in the known models of tRNA, Group I self-splicing intron, and Escherichia coli 16 S rRNA, were predicted using the method.

Full text

PDF
2173

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Borer P. N., Dengler B., Tinoco I., Jr, Uhlenbeck O. C. Stability of ribonucleic acid double-stranded helices. J Mol Biol. 1974 Jul 15;86(4):843–853. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(74)90357-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burke J. M., Belfort M., Cech T. R., Davies R. W., Schweyen R. J., Shub D. A., Szostak J. W., Tabak H. F. Structural conventions for group I introns. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987 Sep 25;15(18):7217–7221. doi: 10.1093/nar/15.18.7217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cech T. R., Tanner N. K., Tinoco I., Jr, Weir B. R., Zuker M., Perlman P. S. Secondary structure of the Tetrahymena ribosomal RNA intervening sequence: structural homology with fungal mitochondrial intervening sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Jul;80(13):3903–3907. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.13.3903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dock-Bregeon A. C., Moras D. Conformational changes and dynamics of tRNAs: evidence from hydrolysis patterns. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1987;52:113–121. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1987.052.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Freier S. M., Kierzek R., Jaeger J. A., Sugimoto N., Caruthers M. H., Neilson T., Turner D. H. Improved free-energy parameters for predictions of RNA duplex stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Dec;83(24):9373–9377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.24.9373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gralla J., Crothers D. M. Free energy of imperfect nucleic acid helices. II. Small hairpin loops. J Mol Biol. 1973 Feb 5;73(4):497–511. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(73)90096-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gutell R. R., Weiser B., Woese C. R., Noller H. F. Comparative anatomy of 16-S-like ribosomal RNA. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1985;32:155–216. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60348-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jaeger J. A., Turner D. H., Zuker M. Improved predictions of secondary structures for RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Oct;86(20):7706–7710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.20.7706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jaeger J. A., Turner D. H., Zuker M. Predicting optimal and suboptimal secondary structure for RNA. Methods Enzymol. 1990;183:281–306. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(90)83019-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. James B. D., Olsen G. J., Pace N. R. Phylogenetic comparative analysis of RNA secondary structure. Methods Enzymol. 1989;180:227–239. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(89)80104-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Le S. V., Chen J. H., Currey K. M., Maizel J. V., Jr A program for predicting significant RNA secondary structures. Comput Appl Biosci. 1988 Mar;4(1):153–159. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/4.1.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Le S. Y., Chen J. H., Nussinov R., Maizel J. V., Jr An improved secondary structure computation method and its application to intervening sequence in the human alpha-like globin mRNA precursors. Comput Appl Biosci. 1988 Aug;4(3):337–344. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/4.3.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Le S. Y., Maizel J. V., Jr A method for assessing the statistical significance of RNA folding. J Theor Biol. 1989 Jun 22;138(4):495–510. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(89)80047-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Le S. Y., Malim M. H., Cullen B. R., Maizel J. V. A highly conserved RNA folding region coincident with the Rev response element of primate immunodeficiency viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Mar 25;18(6):1613–1623. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.6.1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Le S. Y., Owens J., Nussinov R., Chen J. H., Shapiro B., Maizel J. V. RNA secondary structures: comparison and determination of frequently recurring substructures by consensus. Comput Appl Biosci. 1989 Jul;5(3):205–210. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/5.3.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Martinez H. M. An RNA folding rule. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):323–334. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Noller H. F., Kop J., Wheaton V., Brosius J., Gutell R. R., Kopylov A. M., Dohme F., Herr W., Stahl D. A., Gupta R. Secondary structure model for 23S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Nov 25;9(22):6167–6189. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.22.6167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Noller H. F., Woese C. R. Secondary structure of 16S ribosomal RNA. Science. 1981 Apr 24;212(4493):403–411. doi: 10.1126/science.6163215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nussinov R., Jacobson A. B. Fast algorithm for predicting the secondary structure of single-stranded RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6309–6313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.11.6309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Papanicolaou C., Gouy M., Ninio J. An energy model that predicts the correct folding of both the tRNA and the 5S RNA molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):31–44. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pipas J. M., McMahon J. E. Method for predicting RNA secondary structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jun;72(6):2017–2021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.6.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Quigley G. J., Gehrke L., Roth D. A., Auron P. E. Computer-aided nucleic acid secondary structure modeling incorporating enzymatic digestion data. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984 Jan 11;12(1 Pt 1):347–366. doi: 10.1093/nar/12.1part1.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Salser W. Globin mRNA sequences: analysis of base pairing and evolutionary implications. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1978;42(Pt 2):985–1002. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1978.042.01.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stern S., Powers T., Changchien L. M., Noller H. F. RNA-protein interactions in 30S ribosomal subunits: folding and function of 16S rRNA. Science. 1989 May 19;244(4906):783–790. doi: 10.1126/science.2658053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Studnicka G. M., Rahn G. M., Cummings I. W., Salser W. A. Computer method for predicting the secondary structure of single-stranded RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1978 Sep;5(9):3365–3387. doi: 10.1093/nar/5.9.3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tinoco I., Jr, Borer P. N., Dengler B., Levin M. D., Uhlenbeck O. C., Crothers D. M., Bralla J. Improved estimation of secondary structure in ribonucleic acids. Nat New Biol. 1973 Nov 14;246(150):40–41. doi: 10.1038/newbio246040a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tinoco I., Jr, Davis P. W., Hardin C. C., Puglisi J. D., Walker G. T., Wyatt J. RNA structure from A to Z. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1987;52:135–146. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1987.052.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Turner D. H., Sugimoto N., Jaeger J. A., Longfellow C. E., Freier S. M., Kierzek R. Improved parameters for prediction of RNA structure. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1987;52:123–133. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1987.052.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Williams A. L., Jr, Tinoco I., Jr A dynamic programming algorithm for finding alternative RNA secondary structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Jan 10;14(1):299–315. doi: 10.1093/nar/14.1.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zuker M., Jaeger J. A., Turner D. H. A comparison of optimal and suboptimal RNA secondary structures predicted by free energy minimization with structures determined by phylogenetic comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 May 25;19(10):2707–2714. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.10.2707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zuker M. On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule. Science. 1989 Apr 7;244(4900):48–52. doi: 10.1126/science.2468181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zuker M., Stiegler P. Optimal computer folding of large RNA sequences using thermodynamics and auxiliary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981 Jan 10;9(1):133–148. doi: 10.1093/nar/9.1.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nucleic Acids Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES