Abstract
Purpose of review
Solid organ xenotransplantation could be the future of transplantation, but improved outcomes are required in experimental models before clinical trials are justified. This review summarizes recent advances in solid organ xenotransplantation using organs from α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) pigs (with or without other genetic modifications) and novel therapeutic approaches.
Recent findings
Work on the development of genetically-engineered pigs has been considerable during the past few years, with many research institutes reporting the outcomes of research. Multiple gene modifications on a GTKO background have been reported, and the results of transplantation using organs from these pigs have been published. Progress, however, has been variable, and several obstacles, e.g., coagulation dysregulation, have been identified. Heterotopic pig heart xenotransplantation has been associated with graft survival exceeding 8 months, but kidney graft survival has not improved significantly.
Summary
The availability of GTKO pigs with additional genetic modifications aimed towards expression of multiple complement-regulatory proteins and/or human thromboregulatory genes, combined with novel immunosuppressive regimens, e.g., the inclusion of B cell-depleting agents, should improve pig organ survival in the near future.
Keywords: α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout; complement-regulatory proteins; organs; xenotransplantation
INTRODUCTION
The identification of Galα1,3Gal (Gal) as the major target antigen for human and nonhuman primate (NHP) anti-pig antibodies and the production of α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) pigs [1] have helped to resolve the problem of hyperacute rejection. However acute humoral xenograft rejection, chronic rejection, and other barriers to success, e.g., coagulation dysregulation in the form of thrombotic microangiopathy and/or consumptive coagulopathy, need to be addressed if graft survival is to be significantly prolonged.
The initial studies in which kidneys [2] and hearts [3] from GTKO pigs were transplanted into NHPs had encouraging results, but used immunosuppressive regimens that are unlikely to be used clinically. New strategies should be aimed towards (i) extending xenograft survival, (ii) minimizing the side-effects of the immunosuppressive agents, and (iii) enabling clinical trials to be considered.
Extensive reviews of xenotransplantation in pig-to-NHP models have been reported [4*,5]. The current review summarizes the most recent results of solid organ xenotransplantation using GTKO pig organs (with or without additional genetic modifications) in the pig-to-NHP model in combination with novel therapeutic approaches.
HEART XENOTRANSPLANTATION (Table 1) [6-13]
Table 1.
Outcomes of heart xenotransplantation in GTKO pig-to-NHP models between January 2009 and October 2010
| Author (Year) [Ref#] |
Type | Pigs | Recipi- ents |
N. | Survival (days) |
Mean (Median) Survival (days) |
Immunosuppression | Anti- coagulant |
Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azimzadeh (2009) [6] | HIA | GTKO | Baboon | 14 | n.a | n.a | None (n=4), ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs (+/−CTLA4-Ig) | Heparin, Aspirin | Early graft failure, complement deposition |
| HIA | GTKO/CRP | Baboon | 9 | n.a | n.a | None (n=1), ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs (+/−CTLA4-Ig) | Heparin, Aspirin | CRP (either CD46 or CD55). Reduced incidence of early graft failure, minimal complement deposition | |
| Burdorf (2009) [7] | HIA | GTKO | Baboon | 3 | <1,<1, 6 | 3 (1) | ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs (n=2) + CTLA4-Ig (n=1) | n.a. | n.a. |
| HIA | GTKO/CD46 | Baboon | 6 | 2,8,10,10,1 2,28 | 12 (10) | ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs (n=4) +CTLA4-Ig (n=2) | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Byrne (2009) [8] | HIA | GTKO | Baboon | 6 | n.a. | n.a (21) | Splenectomy+Rituximab+ATG+TAC+RAPA | n.a. | HAR in 90 min (n= 1), AHXR, chronic vascular antibody deposition, complement deposition |
| HIA | GTKO/CD55 | Baboon | 5 | n.a. | n.a (28) | Splenectomy+Rituximab+ATG+TAC+RAPA | n.a. | No complement deposition, chronic vascular antibody deposition | |
| Ezzelarab (2009) [9] | HIA | GTKO | Baboon | 9 | 2.5h,1,6,6, 7,12,12,35, 56 | 15 (7) | None (n=2), CVF only (n=1), CVF+ATG+Leflunomide (n=1), low-dose anti-CD154+CTLA4-Ig+MMF (n=1), ATG+CVF+anti-CD154+MMF+Cs (n=4) | Heparin, Ketorolac, PGI2 | No accommodation, AHXR, CC, TM, stenosis at anastomoses, ischemic myopathy |
| Brenner (2010) [10] | HIA | GTKO | Baboon | 2 | 8,8 | 8 (8) | Rituximab+TAC+RAPA+Cs+FcyRIIb | n.a. | No rejection. Died due to ileus |
| HIA | GTKO/CD46 | Baboon | 3 | 7,17,29 | 18 (17) | Rituximab+TAC+RAPA+Cs+FcyRIIb+ATG +/− immunoadsorption | n.a. | Mild-moderate rejection, sepsis, left ventricular thrombus | |
| HIA | GTKO/HO-1 | Baboon | 2 | 8,13 | 11 (11) | Rituximab+TAC+RAPA+Cs+FcyRIIb +/− ATG | n.a. | Humoral rejection, cellular rejection, graft failure | |
| Mohiuddin (2010) [11] | HIA | GTKO/CD46 | Baboon | 22 | n.a. 179, >195 ongoing | n.a -(10, n=6) (60, n=14) | None (n= 2), ATG+MMF+CVF+Cs+anti-CD154 (n=6) ATG+MMF+CVF+Cs+anti-CD154 +Rituximab (n=14) | Heparin, Aspirin, Ketorolac | HAR when no IS. Several focal complications related to heterotopic xenografting (abdominal adhesions, bleeding, intestinal obstruction) |
| Bauer (2010) [12] | HIT | GTKO/CD46 | Baboon | 2 | <1, 50 | 26 (26) | Immunoadsorption pretransplantation, Rituximab+TAC+RAPA+MMF+Cs | n.a. | Died from cerebral air-embolism (10h). Poor myocardial perfusion due to ventricular fibrillation |
| McGregor (2009) [13] | OHT | GTKO/CD55 | Baboon | 6 | 2,14,23,34, 40,57 | 28 (29) | ATG+TAC+RAPA+Cs | n.a. | Rejection (extensive data are n.a) |
AHXR= acute humoral xenograft rejection, ATG= antithymocyte globulin, CC= consumptive coagulopathy, CRP= complement-regulatory protein, Cs= corticosteroids, CVF= cobra venom factor, HAR= hyperacute rejection, HIA= heterotopic intra-abdominal, HIT= heterotopic intra-thoracic, IS= immunosuppression, MMF= mycophenolate mofetil, n.a= not available, OHT= orthotopic, PGI2= prostacycline, RAPA= rapamaycin, TAC= tacrolimus, TM= thrombotic microangiopathy.
Experimental heart xenotransplantation can be performed using three different techniques: (i) heterotopic intra-abdominal model, (ii) heterotopic intra-thoracic model, and (iii) orthotopic model.
Heterotopic intra-abdominal model
Mohiuddin et al achieved graft survival of >8 months using hearts from GTKO pigs expressing a human complement-regulatory protein (CRP), CD46 [11**]. Median graft survival was increased from 10 to 60 days by the addition of a B cell-depleting agent (anti-CD20mAb). However, their study was not without significant complications associated with surgical technique, immunosuppressive regimen, and other aspects of recipient management [14,15].
Byrne and colleagues performed 11 transplants using GTKO or GTKO/CD55 pig hearts [8]. Despite T and B cell depletion and splenectomy, median survivals were not prolonged in comparison to other reports in the literature. However, expression of CD55 reduced complement deposition in the graft. Similarly, Azimzadeh et al transplanted GTKO or GTKO/CRP (CD46 or CD55) pig hearts into baboons, and demonstrated that complement deposition and early graft failure were significantly reduced by CRP expression [6*].
Ezzelarab et al demonstrated that costimulation blockade with an anti-CD154mAb prolonged graft survival, but early or late xenograft failure was associated with activation of the innate immune system [9*]. Consumptive coagulopathy occurred in 6 of 9 recipients. Using the same model and immunosuppression as Ezzelarab et al [9*], Burdorf et al concluded that a high pre-transplantation level of anti-nonGal antibodies limited the efficacy of costimulation blockade [7]. There is clearly a need for alternative or adjunct therapies to control the humoral response.
Brenner et al transplanted hearts from GTKO, GTKO/CD46, or GTKO/HO-1 (heme oxygenase-1) pigs. There was no difference in median survival in relation to the various genotypes of the organ-source pig, but extended survival was achieved when immunoadsorption was carried out [10].
The identification of major anti-nonGal antibodies and development of strategies to reduce the corresponding antigens on the pig [16] may lead to prolonged survival.
Heterotopic intra-thoracic model
Bauer et al [12] employed the original Losman and Barnard technique of intra-thoracic heterotopic heart transplantation [17]. This would be a clinically-applicable approach because, in view of the continuing presence of the recipient’s native heart, graft failure would not necessarily result in death of the patient [12]. They reported two cases using GTKO/CD46 pig hearts in baboons, and incorporated pre-transplantation immunoadsorption of anti-pig antibody in the recipient. The first recipient died within hours from air embolism and brain damage, while the second graft functioned for 50 days.
Orthotopic model
McGregor et al [13**,18] reported orthotopic heart transplantation of GTKO/CD55 pig hearts transplanted into baboons using a clinically-applicable immunosuppressive regimen (Table 1). Longest survival was 57 days (with good cardiac function), which is the longest reported to date, and median survival was 28.5 days.
KIDNEY XENOTRANSPLANTATION (Table 2) [6,7,9, 19-25]
Table 2.
Outcomes of kidney xenotransplantation in GTKO pig-to-NHP models between January 2009 and October 2010
| Author (Year) [Ref#] |
Pigs | Recipi- ents |
N. | Survival (days) |
Mean (Median) Survival (days) |
Immunosuppression | Anti- coagulant |
Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Azimzadeh (2009) [6] | GTKO | Baboon | 7 | n.a | n.a | None (n=1), ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs (+/− CTLA4-Ig) | Heparin, Aspirin | Early graft failure, complement deposition |
| GTKO/CRP | Baboon | 5 | n.a | n.a | ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs (+/− CTLA4-Ig) | Heparin, Aspirin | CRP (either CD46 or CD55), reduced early graft failure incidence, minimal complement deposition | |
| Burdorf (2009) [7] | GTKO | Baboon | 3 | <1,5,7 | 4 (5) | ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs (+/− CTLA4-Ig) | n.a. | n.a. |
| GTKO/CD55 | Baboon | 3 | <1,12,12 | 8 (12) | ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs | n.a. | n.a. | |
| GTKO/CD46 | Baboon | 2 | 5,12 | 9 (9) | ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs (+/− CTLA4-Ig) | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Ezzelarab (2009) [9] | GTKO | Baboon | 3 | 2, 3, 5 | 3 (3) | CVF only (n=1), low-dose anti-CD154+CTLA4-Ig+MMF (n=1), ATG+CVF+anti-CD154+MMF+Cs(n=1) | Heparin, Ketorolac, PGI2 | AHXR, CC, renal artery thrombosis |
| Cozzi E (2009) [19] | GTKO/CD55/CD59/CD39/HT | Cyno | 6 | 8 to 22 | 16 (16) | CyP+CSA+MMF+Cs | n.a. | Kidney failure, abdominal bleeding (n=1), AHXR |
| Greisemer (2009) [20] | GTKO | Baboon | 7 | 18,28,40,49,57,81,83 | 51 (49) | (a) Thymokidney+Rituximab+ATG+LoCD2b + anti-CD154+TAC+MMF (n=4), (a) - LoCD2b (n=2), (a) – TAC + WBI (n=1) | n.a. | Died from drug reaction, invasive CMV infection, AMI, pleural effusion from proteinuria, ARDS, |
| Le Bas-Bernardet (2009) [21] | GTKO/CD55/CD59/CD39/HT | Baboon | 5 | 4,4,12,13,1 4 | 13 (13) (ISed) | None (n=2) or CyP+TAC+MMF+C1 inhibitor | n.a. | AHXR |
| Salvaris (2009) [22] | GTKO/CD55/CD59/HT | Baboon | 6 | <2h,2,3,3,4, 5 | 3 (3) | None | None | HAR, CC |
| Greisemer (2010) [23] | GTKO | Baboon | 2 | 8,24 | 16 (16) | Splenectomy+WBI+Thymus Irridation+ ATG+LoCD2b+TAC+GTKO BM (+CVF in one case) | Heparin, PGI2 | Renal failure, pulmonary edema, gross enlargement of the kidney, hemorrhage and thrombi |
| Lin (2010) [24] | GTKO | Baboon | 1 | 7 | 7 | ATG+anti-CD154+CVF+MMF+Cs | Heparin, Ketorolac, PGI2 | CC |
| GTKO/CD46 | Baboon | 6 | 2,4,9,10,10, 16 | 9 (10) | None (n=1), ATG+anti-CD154+MMF (n=4), ATG+anti-CD154+MMF+Cs (n=1) | Heparin, Ketorolac, PGI2 | Fluid overload, CC | |
| Nishimura (2010) [25] | GTKO | Baboon | 4 | 16,16,17,50 | 25 (17) | Thymokidney+ATG+Rituximab+anti-CD154 +low dose TAC+MMF | n.a. | Sudden death (thrombi in vessels), AHXR |
AMI= acute myocardial infarction, ARDS= acute respiratory distress syndrome, BM= bone marrow, CMV= cytomegalovirus, CSA= cyclosporine, cyno= cynomolgus monkey, CyP= cyclophosphamide, LoCD2b= mouse anti-human CD2b antibody, WBI= whole body irradiation. Other abbreviations as for Table 1.
In a non-immunosuppressed pig-to-monkey model, an Australian group showed that the combination of GTKO with expression of CD55/CD59/HT (H-transferase) improved renal xenograft survival and delayed or prevented the development of consumptive coagulopathy [22].
Under the Xenome Project of the European Union, pigs with multiple genetic modifications (GTKO/CD55/CD39/HT) were transplanted into NHPs. Cozzi et al in cynomolgus monkeys [19*] and Le Bas-Bernardet et al in baboons [21] reported similar outcomes using different clinically-applicable immunosuppressive regimens. In the Cozzi et al experience [19*], multiple genetic modifications were not associated with prolonged recipient survival, though preliminary coagulation data were consistent with a lower extent of coagulopathy when compared with previous studies using pigs expressing CD55 on a wild-type background. They drew attention to the presence of CD20+ infiltrating cells in the majority of the grafts, which correlates with Mohiuddin’s experience that the addition of a B cell-depleting agent to the immunosuppressive regimen is beneficial.
The longest survivals of baboons with life-saving pig kidney grafts were reported by the Boston group in their thymokidney transplantation models [20,25]. Greisemer et al [20] performed seven GTKO pig-to-baboon thymokidney transplants. Median survival was 49 days, with the longest survival being 83 days. This baboon was the only one that received whole body radiation, and appears to have been reported previously [2]. Several immunosuppressive regimens, including different T cell-depleting (anti-thymocyte globulin or monoclonal mouse anti-human CD2b antibody) and B cell-depleting (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) agents were tested. The kidney grafts showed no signs of cellular infiltration or deposition of IgG, and no grafts were lost from rejection. In the same thymokidney model, the same group reported that high levels of preformed cytotoxic anti-nonGal antibody did not induce hyperacute rejection, but were associated with early graft loss [25], correlating with the observations of Burdorf et al [7].
With the goal of inducing transplantation tolerance, the Boston group performed GTKO pig-to-baboon renal xenotransplants using an extensive immunosuppressive regimen combined with GTKO pig bone marrow administration [23]. Two baboons received kidney transplants 2 or 17 days after bone marrow administration. One baboon died from renal failure (day 8) and the other developed thrombocytopenia and consumptive coagulopathy, and expired with pulmonary edema after 24 days.
Burdorf et al reported kidney transplants in baboons from GTKO, GTKO/CD55, and GTKO/CD46 pigs [7]. Various immunosuppressive regimens included T cell-depletion and costimulation blockade. Prolonged survival was achieved with GTKO/CD55 and GTKO/CD46 pigs when compared to GTKO pigs. They observed the same outcomes as in their heart xenotransplantation model in that a high pre-transplant level of anti-nonGal antibodies was associated with a substantial incidence of early graft failure. This antibody response has been reviewed by others [16,26]
Ezzelarab et al reported that the GTKO genetic modification alone with depletion of complement activity in the recipient by cobra venom factor was not enough to prevent acute humoral xenograft rejection and/or consumptive coagulopathy [9*]. Lin et al studied the role of tissue factor expression on circulating platelets and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) following either GTKO or GTKO/CD46 pig kidney transplantation in baboons [24**]. Tissue factor was detected on platelets on post-transplant day 1, but was not detected on PBMCs until consumptive coagulopathy was beginning to develop. Graft histopathology showed fibrin deposition and platelet aggregation (n=6), but with only minor features indicating a humoral immune response, and no macrophage, B or T cell infiltration. Prevention of recipient platelet activation will be critical for successful pig kidney transplantation.
LIVER XENOTRANSPLANTATION (Table 3)
Table 3.
Outcomes of liver xenotransplantation in GTKO pig-to-NHP models between January 2009 and October 2010
| Author (Year) [Ref#] | Type | Pigs | Recipients | N. | Survival (days) | Mean (Median) Survival (days) | Immunosuppression | Anticoagulant | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ekser 2010 [27] | Orthotopic | GTKO | Baboon | 2 | <1, 6 | 4 (4) | ATG+TAC+MMF+Cs | PGI2 | Donor vs recipient size-mismatch (n=1), death or euthanesia due to hemorrhage in abdomen and lungs |
| Orthotopic | GTKO/CD46 | Baboon | 8 | <1, <1, 1, 4, 5,6,6,7 | 4 (5) | ATG or CyP+TAC+MMF+Cs, CL (to 2 donors), CVF (to one recipient) | Heparin (in two cases), Ketorolac (in 4 cases), PGI2 | PNF on CL treatment. Donor vs recipient size-mismatch (n=1), very high TAC levels, death or euthanesia due to hemorrhage in abdomen and lungs |
The first and only xenotransplantations using GTKO pig livers came from the Pittsburgh group [27**], who reported 10 liver xenotransplants from GTKO or GTKO/CD46 pigs using a clinically-applicable immunosuppressive regimen. The importance of size-matching between pig liver and recipient baboon was emphasized. The narrow abdomen of baboons necessitated the use of livers from pigs that were almost 60% smaller in weight than the recipient baboon. Six of 10 baboons survived for 4-7 days. No obvious difference was observed between GTKO and GTKO/CD46 pig livers. In all cases, liver function was adequate, as evidenced by tests of detoxification, complement activity, coagulation parameters, and production of pig proteins, including coagulation factors [28*]. Pig coagulation factors and proteins appeared to function adequately in baboons, although interspecies compatibility of such proteins remains to be confirmed.
Survival beyond 7 days was prevented by a profound thrombocytopenia that developed within one hour after reperfusion of the graft, ultimately resulting in spontaneous hemorrhage at various sites [27**]. The authors postulated that the thrombocytopenia was associated with the expression of tissue factor on platelets after contact with the pig endothelium, resulting in platelet and platelet-PBMC aggregation and deposition of aggregates in the liver graft, although phagocytosis of the platelets by pig Kupffer cells or hepatocytes could not be ruled out.
The Pittsburgh study was primarily undertaken to determine whether the pig liver could be used as a bridge to allotransplantation in patients with fulminant liver failure. Bridging options, and inclusion and exclusion criteria have been discussed [29*]. The immediate development of thrombocytopenia needs to be prevented before a clinical trial would be justified.
COAGULATION DYSREGULATION
Three review papers discussed this topic [30*, 31*,32] and are reviewed elsewhere in this issue by Cowan et al [33]. The need for pigs expressing one or more human ‘thromboregulatory’ genes, such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) or human thrombomodulin, is crucial. Two attempts using CD39 pig kidneys have been reported (Table 2), but adequate expression of CD39 was doubtful [19*,21]. The effect of expression of a thomboregulatory gene or genes therefore remains untested. There are several pharmacologic agents that would likely prove beneficial, e.g., heparin, aspirin, ketorolac, prostacyclin (Tables 1–3), but which interventions will be beneficial, yet effective and safe, also remains uncertain [30*,32].
The discrepancies between the results reported by various groups with regard to the development of coagulopathy cannot be fully explained, though a number of factors may be playing roles, e.g., differences in the source of the pigs, the immunosuppressive regimen, and the organ transplanted. The literature suggests that the development of consumptive coagulopathy is less common or delayed when intensive immunosuppressive therapy is administered [34], though the exact mechanism of this effect remains uncertain. It is well-known that the costimulation blockade agent, anti-CD154mAb, is associated with thromboembolic events [35-37], and it is possible that this may be a factor in some of the reported studies, though thrombotic microangiopathy develops in NHPs receiving conventional immunosuppressive therapy [34]. Our experience of transplanting GTKO pig organs does not indicate to us that the GTKO genetic modification increases the ‘thrombogenicity’ of the organ graft. However, Knosalla et al have reported that there is a clear heterogeneity between renal and cardiac xenograft endothelium, which may account for the observed increased incidence of consumptive coagulopathy after pig kidney xenotransplantation [38*].
COMPLEMENT REGULATION
Miyagawa et al published a valuable review on complement regulation in the GTKO era [39**]. After GTKO pig organ xenotransplantation, complement is activated by (i) the classical pathway, by the interaction of anti-nonGal antibodies and nonGal antigens, and by ischemic injury, (ii) the alternative pathway, especially after pig islet transplantation, and (iii) the lectin pathway. The complement system represents an important recognition and effector mechanism of acute humoral xenograft rejection. The various CRPs, e.g., CD35, CD46, CD55, CD59, C1-inhibitor, regulate complement activation at different points in the complement cascade. Therefore, it will be preferable to express multiple human CRP genes in GTKO pigs rather than rely on a single gene.
Cowan and D’Apice emphasized the importance of anti-nonGal antibodies in the humoral response to a GTKO pig organ [32]. Without complete suppression of production of these antibodies, there is progressive activation and injury of the graft endothelium, resulting in thrombotic microangiopathy, with subsequent graft loss [31**].
THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF CYTOTHERAPY
Cytotherapy (e.g., the infusion of bone marrow, T regulatory cells, or mesenchymal stem cells [MSCs]) to the recipient of a solid organ xenograft could be beneficial [23]. In their quest for microchimerism, Greisemer et al administered GTKO bone marrow to baboons [23]. Of the 4 baboons, 2 received pig kidney transplants, with no significant prolongation of graft survival compared to that in baboons that did not receive bone marrow (summarized above).
Although there are several different subtypes of T regulatory cells, CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells are the most characterized and have been suggested as an immunosuppressive strategy in xenotransplantation [40*,41*,42]. Although in vitro studies show expanded T regulatory cells inhibit the baboon cellular response to pig PBMC, the effect on prolongation of xenograft survival needs confirmation in NHP studies [43]. In contrast to cadaveric allotransplantation, the organ donor is known prior to xenotransplantation, which should facilitate therapy with T regulatory cells.
The report of successful treatment of severe graft-versus-host disease after clinical bone marrow transplantation by MSCs created substantial interest [44]. MSCs prohibit the proliferation of T cells, inhibit dendritic cell maturation, and induce T regulatory cells, and hence may prove a potential therapy for solid organ transplantation. Ezzelarab et al discussed the potential of (organ) donor-specific genetically-modified pig MSCs [45].
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Five years after the first results of GTKO pig-to-NHP organ transplantation were reported, the addition to GTKO of one or more human CRPs has been associated with better outcomes. The expression of multiple CRPs is probably preferable. Anti-thrombotic gene expression is required to reduce coagulation dysregulation. Table 4 [46-54] summarizes recently generated genetically-engineered pigs. In this regard, human thrombomodulin-expressing pigs have been produced [55], but not yet tested in vivo [52*].
Table 4.
Recent generation of genetically-engineered pigs
| Author (Year) [Ref#] | Genetically engineered Pigs | Site of Expression | Function | Mechanism of Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| For prevention of immune injury | ||||
| Phelps (2009) [46] | Porcine CTLA4-Ig | High, ubiquitous | Costimulation blockade and decreased T cell response | Porcine CTLA4-Ig binds to pig CD80 or CD86 and prevents direct response (Pigs - susceptible to opportunistic infection) |
| Weiss (2009) [47] | HLA-E/human β2-microglobulin | Endothelium | protection against human anti-pig NK cells | Interacts with inhibitory receptor CD94/NKG2A on human NK cells |
| Choi (2010) [48] | Human FAS ligand | Membrane bound -metalloproteinase resistant | Prevents Human CD8+ and NK cell cytotoxicity | FAS–FAS ligand-induced apoptosis |
| Hara (2010) [49] | CIITA-DN | not available | Immuno protection | Inhibition of SLA Class II expression |
| Oropeza (2010) [50] | Human A20 | Skeletal muscles, heart and PAECs | Anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic | Protects against TNFα-mediated apoptosis, blocks NF-κB and caspases |
| Peterson (2010) [51] | Human hemeoxygenase-1 | not available | Cytoprotective | Anti-apoptotic and cell protective |
| For prevention of coagulopathy | ||||
| Peterson (2009) [52] | Human thrombomodulin (h TM) in hCD59/CD55 background | Kidney>heart≫ lungs> liver | Anticoagulant/Anti inflammatory activity | Binds human thrombin and activates protein C (anticoagulation) |
| For prevention of PERV | ||||
|
Dieckhoff (2008) [53] Ramsoondar (2009) [54] |
Transgenic PERV siRNA expression | Ubiquitous | Prevention of propagation of PERV | RNA interference of gag and pol PERV genes |
CIITA-DN= Major histocompatability complex Class II TransActivator gene knockdown, NF-κB= nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cell, NK= natural killer, PAEC: porcine aortic endothelial cell, PERV= porcine endogenous retrovirus, SLA= swine leukocyte antigen, TNF= tumor necrosis factor,
Pigs with potential resistance to the human cellular response are also becoming available. Stimulatory and inhibitory receptor interactions in xenotransplantation have been reviewed elsewhere [56]. The production of human Fas ligand-expressing pigs, which may prevent human CD8+ and natural killer cell cytotoxicity, has recently been reported [48*]. With the aim of protecting against injury by natural killer cells, Weiss et al produced HLA-E/human beta2-microglobulin-expressing pigs [47]. Pigs expressing CTLA4-Ig have been produced so successfully that the level of CTLA4-Ig in the blood was several times higher than the therapeutic level [46*]; these pigs demonstrated features of immunoincompetence, e.g., infections, and required euthanasia. MHC class II transactivator (CIITA) gene knock-down pigs have been generated (Dai Y et al, unpublished). In vitro testing of the human CD4+ T cell response to cells from CIITA pigs indicated a much diminished human T cell response, suggesting that organs and cells from these pigs should be significantly protected against the human/NHP cellular immune response [49*].
Other pigs that have become available include human HO-1-expressing pigs [51] and human A20-expressing pigs [50]. These will hopefully provide some anti-apoptopic, anti-inflammatory, and cell protective effects. Porcine endogenous retrovirus siRNA-expressing transgenic pigs, aimed at preventing the activation and propagation of porcine endogenous retrovirus, have been produced [53*,54].
Newer immunosuppressive and adjunctive agents, e.g., anticoagulants, may also be beneficial. Alemtuzumab (anti-CD52mAb) combined with mycophenolate mofetil depleted and maintained the number of CD4+ cells at <25% for at least one year in cynomolgus monkeys [57*], and therefore may have a role in xenotransplantation.
Conclusion
In summary, the increasing number of genetic modifications being made to GTKO pigs [58] and more effective immunosuppressive, anticoagulant, and anti-inflammatory regimens provide the expectation of improved experimental results that may eventually lead to the initiation of clinical trials.
Acknowledgments
Work by our group at the Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute has been or is supported by NIH Grants U01AI068642, R21AI074844-01, 5U19AI090959-02, 3U01AI066331-05S1
ABBREVIATIONS
- CIITA
class II transactivator
- CRP
complement-regulatory protein
- Gal
Galα1,3Gal
- GTKO
α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout
- mAb
monoclonal antibody
- MSC
mesenchymal stem cells
- NHP
nonhuman primate
- PBMC
peripheral blood mononuclear cells
- TFPI
tissue factor pathway inhibitor
Footnotes
Authors declare no conflict of interest
The manuscript has been seen, reviewed and approved by all coauthors
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
(*) of special interest
(**) of outstanding interest
- 1.Phelps CJ, Koike C, Vaught TD, et al. Production of 1,3-galactosyltransferase-deficient pigs. Science. 2003;299:411–414. doi: 10.1126/science.1078942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yamada K, Yazawa K, Shimizu A, et al. Marked prolongation of porcine renal xenograft survival in baboon through the use of alpha 1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout donors and the cotransplantation of thymic tissue. Nat Med. 2005;11:32–34. doi: 10.1038/nm1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kuwaki K, Tseng YL, Dor FJMF, et al. Heart transplantation in baboons using α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout pigs as donors: initial experience. Nat Med. 2005;11:29–31. doi: 10.1038/nm1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4*.Ekser B, Rigotti P, Gridelli B, Cooper DKC. Xenotransplantation of solid organs in the pig-to-primate model. Transplant Immunol. 2009;21:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2008.10.005. Reviews solid organ xenotransplantations between 2000 and 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ekser B, Cooper DKC. Overcoming the barriers to xenotransplantation: prospects for the future. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2010;6:219–230. doi: 10.1586/eci.09.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6*.Azimzadeh AM, Kelishadi SS, Ezzelarab M, et al. Early graft failure of GTKO pig organs in baboons is reduced by hCPRP expression. (Abstract IXA-O-2.2) Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:356. doi: 10.1111/xen.12176. The most numerous solid organ xenotransplantation study, which showed the impact of CRP expression. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burdorf L, Stoddard T, Zhang T, et al. Does addition of CTLA4Ig to an anti-CD154-based regimen prevent anti-non-Gal antibody production after GalTKO or GalTKO/hCRP pig organ xenografting? (Abstract IXA-O-5.6) Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:368. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Byrne GW, Ricci D, Miyagi N, et al. Comparison of GTKO and GTKO;hDAF donor organs in hetertopic cardiac xenotransplantation (Abstract ATC-653) Am J Transplant. 2009;9(suppl 2):380. [Google Scholar]
- 9*.Ezzelarab M, Garcia B, Azimzadeh A, et al. The innate immune response and activation of coagulation in α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout xenograft recipients. Transplantation. 2009;87:805–812. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318199c34f. Underlines the importance of the innate immune response and activation of coagulation in GTKO pig-to-NHP transplantation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Brenner P, Postrach J, Bauer A, et al. The worldwide first model of heterotopic thoracic xenogeneic heart transplantation compared with the heterotopic abdominal technique. (Abstract TTS-800) Transplantation. 2010;90 (suppl):326. [Google Scholar]
- 11**.Mohiuddin MM, Corcoran PC, Singh AK, et al. Over six month survival of cardiac xenograft is achievable but heterotopic placement of the graft may limit consistent prolonged survival. (Abstract TTS-1383) Transplantation. 2010;90(suppl):325. The longest survival to date of heterotopic heart xenotransplantation using GTKO/CD46 pigs and B-cell depletion. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bauer A, Postrach J, Thormann M, et al. First experience with heterotopic thoracic pig-to-baboon cardiac xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:243–249. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2010.00587.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13**.McGregor CGA, Byrne GW, Vlasin M, et al. Early cardiac function and gene expression after orthotopic cardiac xenotransplantation. (Abstract IXA-O-2.4) Xenotransplantation 2009. 16:356. Reports orthotopic heart transplantation in the pig-to-NHP model using a clinically-applicable immunosuppressive regimen, with the longest survival in the literature. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mohiuddin MM, Singh AK, Corcoran PC, et al. B cell depletion of anti-CD20 prolongs GALKO.hCD46 pig heterotopic cardiac xenograft survival in baboons. (Abstract IXA-O-2.5) Xenotransplantation 2009; 16: 357.5) Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:357. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Corcoran PC, Horvath KA, Singh AK, et al. Surgical and nonsurgical complications of a pig to baboon heterotopic heart xenotransplantation model. Transplant Proc. 2010;42:2149–2151. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.05.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yeh P, Ezzelarab M, Bovin N, et al. Investigation of potential carbohydrate antigen targets for human and baboon antibodies. Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:197–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2010.00579.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Novitzky D, Cooper DKC, Barnard CN. The surgical technique of heterotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;36:476–482. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60492-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.McGregor C. Xenogeneic orthotopic heart transplantation: Where are we now? Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:114. [Google Scholar]
- 19*.Cozzi E, Simioni P, Nottle MB, et al. Preliminary study in a life supporting pig to primate xenotransplantation model using GAL KO pigs transgenic for human CD39, CD55, CD59 and fucosyltransferase (Abstract LB IXA O-4) Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:544. One of the first reports of transplantation into NHP of organs from pigs with multiple genetic modifications on a GTKO background. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Griesemer AD, Hirakata A, Shimizu A, et al. Results of Gal-knockout porcine thymokidney xenografts. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:2669–2678. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02849.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Le Bas-Bernardet S, Tillou X, Poirier N, et al. First xenotransplantations of GAL KO, CD55, CD59, CD39, HT transgenic pig kidneys in baboons (Abstract LB IXA O-3) Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:543. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Salvaris E, Hawthorne WJ, Peirce S, et al. Improved survival of GalT KO/hCD55-hCD59 pig renal xenografts in non-immunosuppressed baboons. (Abstract IXA-O-2.9) Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:358. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Griesemer AD, Liang F, Hirataka A, et al. Occurrence of specific humoral non-responsiveness to swine antigens following administration of GalT-KO bone marrow to baboons. Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:300–312. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2010.00600.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24**.Lin CC, Ezzelarab M, Shapiro R, et al. Recipient tissue factor expression is associated with consumptive coagulopathy in pig-to-primate kidney xenotransplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:1556–1568. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03147.x. Documents the importance of tissue factor expression in consumptive coagulopathy in GTKO pig-to-primate kidney transplantation. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nishimura H, Shimizu A, Griesemer A, et al. High levels of cytotoxic anti-non Gal preformed natural antibody did not induce hyperacute rejection but did cause early graft loss in a GalT-KO pig-to-baboon thymokidney model. (Abstract TTS-2413) Transplantation. 2010;90 (suppl):311. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Harnden I, Kiernan K, Kearns-Jonker M. The anti-nonGal xenoantibody response to alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene knockout pig xenografts. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2010;15:207–211. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e328336b854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27**.Ekser B, Long C, Echeverri GJ, et al. Impact of thrombocytopenia on survival of baboons after genetically modified pig liver transplants: clinical relevance. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:273–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02945.x. The first report on pig liver xenotransplantation using GTKO and GTKO/CD46 pig livers, and demonstrates the impact of thrombocytopenia on the survival of liver grafts. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28*.Ekser B, Echeverri GJ, Cortese Hassett A, et al. Hepatic function after genetically engineered pig liver transplantation in baboons. Transplantation. 2010;90:483–493. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e98d51. Reports on pig liver function after xenotransplantation, showing evidence for porcine protein production. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29*.Ekser B, Gridelli B, Tector AJ, Cooper DKC. Pig liver transplantation as a bridge to allotransplantation: which patients might benefit? Transplantation. 2009;88:1041–1049. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ba0555. Discusses inclusion and exclusion criteria for pig liver transplantation as a bridge to allotransplantation, and compares this approach with other bridging options. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30*.Schmelzle M, Schulte am Esch J, 2nd, Robson SC. Coagulation, platelet activation and thrombosis in xenotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2010;15:212–218. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283373ccc. Summarizes the problem of coagulation and related issues in xenotransplantation. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31**.Cowan PJ, Roussell JC, d’Apice AJF. The vascular and coagulation issues in xenotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2009;14:161–167. doi: 10.1097/mot.0b013e3283279591. An extensive and valuable review of coagulation issues in xenotransplantation. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cowan PJ, d’Apice AJF. Complement activation and coagulation in xenotransplantation. Immunol Cell Biol. 2009;87:203–208. doi: 10.1038/icb.2008.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cowan, et al. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011 (current issue – please insert the details) [Google Scholar]
- 34.Byrne GW, Davies WR, Oi K, et al. Increased immunosuppression, not anticoagulation, extends cardiac xenograft survival. Transplantation. 2006;82:1787–1791. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000251387.40499.0f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kawai T, Sogawa H, Boskovic S, et al. CD154 blockade for induction of mixed chimerism and prolonged renal allograft survival in nonhuman primates. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:1391–1398. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kawai T, Andrews D, Colvin RB, et al. Thromboembolic complications after treatment with monoclonal antibody against CD40 ligand. Nat Med. 2000;6:114. doi: 10.1038/72162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Knosalla C, Gollackner B, Cooper DKC. Anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody and thromboembolism revisited. Transplantation. 2002;74:416–417. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200208150-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38*.Knosalla C, Yazawa K, Behdad A, et al. Renal and cardiac endothelial heterogeneity impact acute vascular rejection in pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:1006–1016. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02602.x. Provides evidence for the heterogeneity of endothelium from different organs. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39**.Miyagawa S, Yamamoto A, Matsunami K, et al. Complement regulation in the GalT KO era. Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:11–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2010.00569.x. Excellent review of complement regulation in xenotransplantation. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40*.Muller YD, Golshayan D, Ehirchiou D, et al. T regulatory cells in xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:121–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00531.x. An extensive review of T regulatory cells and their utilization in xenotransplantation. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41*.O’Connell PJ, Yi S, Carrington EM, Lew AM. Role of regulatory T cells in xenotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2010;15:224–229. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e3283373c27. A useful review of T regulatory cells in xenotransplantation. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sun L, Yi S, O’Connell PJ. Foxp3 regulates human natural CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell-mediated suppression of xenogeneic response. Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:121–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2010.00571.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dons EM, Raimondi G, Cooper DKC, Thomson AW. Non-human primate regulatory T cells: current biology and implications for transplantation. Transplantation. 2010;90:811–816. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ebf782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Le Blanc K, Frassoni F, Ball L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of steroid-resistant, severe, acute graft-versus-host disease: a phase II study. Lancet. 2008;371:1579–1586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60690-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ezzelarab M, Ayares D, Cooper DKC. The potential of genetically-modified pig mesenchymal stromal cells in xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:3–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00567.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46*.Phelps CJ, Ball SF, Vaught TD, et al. Production and characterization of transgenic pigs expressing CTLA4-Ig. Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:477–485. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00533.x. First report on the production of pigs expressing CTLA4-Ig. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Weiss EH, Lilienfeld BG, Müller S, et al. HLA-E/human beta2-microglobulin transgenic pigs: protection against xenogeneic human anti-pig natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Transplantation. 2009;87:35–43. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318191c784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48*.Choi KM, Jin DI, Hong SP, et al. Production of transgenic cloned miniature pigs with membrane-bound human Fas ligand (FasL) by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Nature Precedings. 2010 in press( http://precedings.nature.com/documents/4539/version/1/files/npre20104539-1.pdf) The first report on the production of pigs expressing human Fas ligand.
- 49*.Hara H, Crossley T, Witt W, Long C, Fang J, Ezzelarab M, Starzl TE, Ayares D, Cooper DKC, Dai Y. Dominant-negative CIITA transgenic pigs – effect on the human anti-pig T cell immune response and immune status. (Abstract ATC-503) Am J Transplant. 2010;10(Suppl 4):137. First report of in vitro studies using cells from CIITA-knockdown pigs. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Oropeza M, Petersen B, Carnwath JW, et al. Transgenic expression of the human A20 gene in cloned pigs provides protection against apoptotic and inflammatory stimuli. Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:522–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00556.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Petersen B, Lucas-Harn A, Lemme E, et al. Generation and characterization of pigs transgenic for human hemeoxygenase-1 (hHO-1) Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:102–103. [Google Scholar]
- 52*.Peterson B, Ramackers W, Tiede A, et al. Pigs transgenic for human thrombomodulin have elevated production of activated protein C. Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:486–495. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00537.x. The first report on the production of pigs expressing human thrombomodulin. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53*.Dieckhoff B, Peterson B, Kues WA, et al. Knockdown of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) expression by PERV-specific shRNA in transgenic pigs. Xenotransplantation. 2008;15:36–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2008.00442.x. First report on the generation of PERV-knockdown pigs. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ramsoondar J, Vaught T, Ball S, et al. Production of transgenic pigs that express porcine endogenous retrovirus small interfering RNAs. Xenotransplantation. 2009;16:164–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00525.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Miwa Y, Yamamoto K, Onishi A, et al. Potential value of human thrombomodulin and DAF expression for coagulation control in pig-to-human xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:26–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Plege A, Schwinzer R. Stimulatory and inhibitory receptor interactions in xenotransplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2010;15:219–223. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e328336b8e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57*.van der Windt DJ, Smetanka C, Macedo C, et al. Investigation of lymphocyte depletion and repopulation using alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in cynomolgus monkeys. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:773–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03050.x. Innovative study of the use of alemtuzumab in nonhuman primates. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nagashima H, Matsunari H, Umeyama K. Recent advances in production of genetically modified pigs for xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation. 2010;17:104–105. [Google Scholar]
