Skip to main content
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology logoLink to American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
. 2010 Jun 4;44(4):483–490. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0391OC

Endothelial Dysfunction and Claudin 5 Regulation during Acrolein-Induced Lung Injury

An Soo Jang 1,2, Vincent J Concel 1, Kiflai Bein 1, Kelly A Brant 1, Shannen Liu 1, Hannah Pope-Varsalona 1, Richard A Dopico Jr 1, Y P Peter Di 1, Daren L Knoell 3, Aaron Barchowsky 1, George D Leikauf 1
PMCID: PMC3095921  PMID: 20525806

Abstract

An integral membrane protein, Claudin 5 (CLDN5), is a critical component of endothelial tight junctions that control pericellular permeability. Breaching of endothelial barriers is a key event in the development of pulmonary edema during acute lung injury (ALI). A major irritant in smoke, acrolein can induce ALI possibly by altering CLDN5 expression. This study sought to determine the cell signaling mechanism controlling endothelial CLDN5 expression during ALI. To assess susceptibility, 12 mouse strains were exposed to acrolein (10 ppm, 24 h), and survival monitored. Histology, lavage protein, and CLDN5 transcripts were measured in the lung of the most sensitive and resistant strains. CLDN5 transcripts and phosphorylation status of forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) and catenin (cadherin-associated protein) beta 1 (CTNNB1) proteins were determined in control and acrolein-treated human endothelial cells. Mean survival time (MST) varied more than 2-fold among strains with the susceptible (BALB/cByJ) and resistant (129X1/SvJ) strains (MST, 17.3 ± 1.9 h vs. 41.4 ± 5.1 h, respectively). Histological analysis revealed earlier perivascular enlargement in the BALB/cByJ than in 129X1/SvJ mouse lung. Lung CLDN5 transcript and protein increased more in the resistant strain than in the susceptible strain. In human endothelial cells, 30 nM acrolein increased CLDN5 transcripts and increased p-FOXO1 protein levels. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002 diminished the acrolein-induced increased CLDN5 transcript. Acrolein (300 nM) decreased CLDN5 transcripts, which were accompanied by increased FOXO1 and CTNNB1. The phosphorylation status of these transcription factors was consistent with the observed CLDN5 alteration. Preservation of endothelial CLDN5 may be a novel clinical approach for ALI therapy.

Keywords: ARDS, perivascular edema, vascular permeability, smoke inhalation, carboxyl stress


CLINICAL RELEVANCE.

One of the major histological features of acute lung injury is pulmonary edema, which results from increased epithelial and endothelial permeability and decreased clearance of edema fluid by the alveolar epithelium. In contrast to other claudins (CLDN) in the lung, CLDN5, which is expressed weakly in the epithelium, is expressed strongly in endothelium of normal lung. However, its role in acute lung injury has had modest attention in the past. Acrolein-induced acute lung injury was marked by perivascular edema in mice. This is accompanied by a compensatory increase in CLDN5 transcripts, which was more evident in a resistant than in a sensitive mouse strain. Acrolein (30 nM) stimulated phosphorylation of FOXO1 protein and increased CLDN5 transcripts, whereas 300 nM acrolein stimulated FOXO1 and CTNNB1 protein levels and decreased CLDN5 transcripts. These events are consistent with the rapid increase in vascular permeability and could provide a critical target for future pharmacological intervention during acute lung injury.

Adhesive structures between adjacent cells, including tight and adherens junctions, enable the establishment of cell polarity, differentiation, and survival and are critical to the maintenance of tissue integrity (1). Tight junctions consist of a macromolecular complex of numerous adhesive molecules, including occludin, tight junction proteins (zona occludins), junctional adhesion molecules, and claudins (2). Tight junctions are often located apically with respect to adherens junctions (composed mainly of cadherins), as in epithelial cells, but can be intermingled throughout cell–cell contact areas, as in endothelial cells (3). Tight junction strands serve as a physical barrier to regulate solutes and water movement through the paracellular space between epithelial or endothelial cells. Compromised barrier function of adhesive structures is a common event in several diseases, including ischemic brain disease (4, 5), Crohn's disease (6), and acute lung injury (ALI) (79).

In spite of considerable medical achievements, treatment for ALI is limited to supportive care, and recent estimates indicate that mortality remains high (∼ 30–40% or 74,500 deaths per year in the United States) (10). ALI can be induced indirectly (e.g., by sepsis or trauma) or directly (e.g., by smoke inhalation) (8). One major histological feature of ALI is pulmonary edema, which results from increased epithelial and endothelial permeability and decreased clearance of edema fluid by the alveolar epithelium. These events, when combined with decreased surfactant-associated protein B synthesis, disrupt surfactant surface tension and ultimately produce respiratory failure (11). These barrier functions require adequate control of paracellular tight junctions; however, our current understanding of the structural components and regulation of tight junctions in the lung is insufficient.

The claudin (CLDN) family consists of 24 tetraspan transmembrane proteins, each of which has a tissue-restricted expression pattern (1214). In the normal lung, bronchiolar epithelial cells mainly express CLDN1, -3, -4, -7, and -18, and alveolar type II epithelial cells mainly express CLDN3, -4, -7, and -18 (7, 9, 15). In epithelial cells, transgenic expression of CLDN1 with CLDN3 increased transepithelial resistance and decreased paracellular permeability, whereas CLDN4 confers selective ion transport function without effecting paracellular solute permeability (16). Recently, Wray and colleagues reported that CLDN4 inhibition decreased transepithelial resistance without altering paracellular permeability in primary rat and human epithelial cells (9). In addition, in vivo CLDN4 epithelial expression was an early event in ALI, leading the authors to conclude that CLDN4 represents a possible mechanism to limit pulmonary edema.

In contrast to other claudins in the lung, CLDN5, while expressed weakly in the epithelium, is expressed strongly in endothelium of normal lung and is intense in endothelium in usual interstitial pneumonia (15). Newborn gene-targeted Cldn5(−/−) mice die within 10 hours of birth possibly due to altered permeability of the blood–brain barrier (17). When CLDN5 was transfected into airway epithelial cells, paracellular permeability increased even in the presence of excessive CLDN1 and CLDN3 (18). Moreover, inducing CLDN5 expression in leaky rat lung endothelial cells can enhance paracellular barrier function against large (but not small) molecules (19). One of the key pathognomic features of ALI is perivascular edema, in part due to endothelial dysfunction (20). In this study, we examine the endothelial dysfunction and CLDN5 expression during lung injury induced by acrolein, a key irritant in smoke.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental Design

Twelve inbred mouse strains were exposed to filtered air (control) or acrolein (10 ppm, 24 h) generated and monitored as described previously (2123), and survival time was recorded. Detailed analyses, which included measurement of lung CLDN5 mRNA and protein, lung histology, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), contrasted the response of the most sensitive (BALB/cByJ) and resistant (129X1/SvJ) strains after exposure to filtered air (0 h, control) or acrolein (10 ppm, 6 or 12 h). Additional tests were performed with a cell line derived from the fusion of human umbilical vascular endothelial cells with the lung carcinoma cell line A549 (EA.hy926) or primary human lung microvascular endothelial cells. Confluent cells were washed three times in Dulbecco's modified PBS (DPBS), incubated for 30 minutes, and exposed to acrolein (≤ 4 h) in DPBS. Assays include measurements of Claudin 5 transcripts, catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1 (CTNNB1), phosphorylated CTNNB1 (Ser 552) (p-CTNNB1), forkhead box O1 (FOXO1), phosphorylated FOXO1 (Ser256) (p-FOXO1), thymoma viral proto-oncogene 1 (AKT), and phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT). EA.hy926 cells were also treated with vehicle (DMSO), 30 nM acrolein, or 30 nM acrolein and 10 μM LY294002 [2-(4-Morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one] (LY), a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor. Additional details of the methods are contained in the online supplement.

Mouse Strains Vary in Sensitivity to Acrolein-Induced ALI

The mean survival time (MST) varied among the 12 mouse strains exposed to acrolein (10 ppm, 24 h) (Figure 1A). The most susceptible (BALB/cByJ) and resistant (129X1/SvJ) mouse strains differed by more than 2-fold (MST 17.3 ± 1.9 h vs. 41.4 ± 5.1 h, respectively). Survival curves for the sensitive (BALB/cByJ) and resistant (129X1/SvJ) mouse strains were significantly different (P < 0.001) (Figure 1B). Thus, the BALB/cByJ and 129X1/SvJ were selected for subsequent analyses. Histological assessment of lung tissue from the sensitive BALB/cByJ strain demonstrated perivascular enlargement present within 12 hours of acrolein exposure (Figure 2C), as compared with strain-matched control (Figure 2A). In acrolein-treated BALB/cByJ mouse lung, leukocytes were present in the perivascular space (Figure 2C) and focal areas in the alveolar interstitium (Figure 2E), with thickening of alveolar wall (Figure 2E). The perivascular enlargement included an increased distance between the tunica media and the tunica adventitia in lung of BALB/cByJ mice (Figure 2G). Neither perivascular enlargement nor leukocytes was evident in the resistant 129X1/SvJ strain after 17 hours of acrolein exposure (Figures 2D and 2F) compared with strain-matched control mice exposed to filtered air (Figure 2B). Similarly, BAL protein increased more in sensitive (BALB/cByJ) mice than in resistant (129X1/SvJ) mice after 12 hours of acrolein exposure (P < 0.001) (see Figure E1 in the online supplement).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Mean survival time (MST) of 12 mouse strains after acrolein exposure. MST varied among mouse strains, with the most susceptible (BALB/cByJ) and resistant (129X1/SvJ) mouse strains varying more than 2-fold (MST, 17.3 ± 1.9 h vs. 41.4 ± 5.1 h, respectively). Mice (n = 9 mice per strain) were exposed to acrolein (10 ppm, 24 h) under specific pathogen-free conditions. (B) Survival curves for the sensitive (BALB/cByJ) and resistant (129X1/SvJ) mouse strains. Between-strain survival time was significantly different using the Kaplan-Meyer method (P < 0.001).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Mouse strains vary in pathophysiological response to acrolein-induced lung pathology. Histological assessment of lung tissue from (A) control (filtered air) BALB/cByJ mice, (B) control (filtered air) 129X1/SvJ mice, (C, E) acrolein (10 ppm, 12 h) exposed BALB/cByJ mice, or (D, F) acrolein (10 ppm, 17 h) exposed 129X1/SvJ mice. Compare (arrow) area around blood vessel from (C) acrolein-treated with (A) control. In the sensitive BALB/cByJ strain, perivascular enlargement was present at 12 hours of exposure. Leukocytes were present in the (C) perivascular space and (E) alveolus in acrolein-treated BALB/cByJ mouse lung. (D) Perivascular enlargement was not as evident in the lungs of the resistant 129X1/SvJ strain as compared with the BALB/cByJ strain after acrolein exposure. (F) Leukocytes present in alveolus were less in the 129X1/SvJ strain as compared with the BALB/cByJ strain. Bar indicates magnification of original image obtained from 5-μM sections prepared with hematoxylin and eosin stain (50 μm in A–D and 10 μm in E and F). (G) The perivascular interstitial space increased more in lung of BALB/cByJ than of 129X1/SvJ mouse strains after acrolein exposure. After acrolein exposure, the length of the distance between the tunica media and the tunica adventitia (median with 25 and 75% confidence intervals in parentheses) increased from control = 2.6 (1.8–3.3) μm to exposed = 16.6 (11.3–24.7) μm in the lung of BALB/cByJ mice and from control = 1.9 (1.4–2.9) μm to exposed = 4.1 (2.8–5.8) μm in the lung of 129X1/SvJ mice. Values plotted indicate the median (line in box) with 25 and 75% confidence intervals (borders of the box) and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). *Statistically (P < 0.001) different from strain-matched control mice (filtered air) as determined by Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on ranks followed by pairwise comparison with the Tukey method.

Lung CLDN5 Transcript Levels Increased during Acrolein-Induced ALI

Because the endothelial tight junction protein CLDN5 had previously been associated with endothelial permeability (18, 19), CLDN5 transcript and protein levels were measured after 6 and 12 hours of acrolein exposure (Figure 3). At 12 hours, lung CLDN5 transcript (Figure 3A) and protein (Figure 3C) increased more in resistant (129X1/SvJ) mice compared with strain-matched control mice (P < 0.001), whereas the lung CLDN5 protein increased less (Figure 3C), and transcript levels in the sensitive (BALB/cByJ) mice were not significantly different from control mice.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Lung Claudin 5 (CLDN5) transcript and protein increased more in the resistant mouse strain (129X1/SvJ) than in the sensitive mouse strain (BALB/cByJ) after acrolein exposure. (A) CLDN5 transcript increased more at 12 hours in 129X1/SvJ than in BALB/cByJ mouse lung. Mice were exposed to control (filtered air, 0 h) or 10 ppm acrolein for 6 or 12 hours, and lung mRNA was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Values are mean ± SE (n = 8 mice per group). At 12 hours, lung CLDN5 transcript levels increased in resistant (129X1/SvJ) mice compared with strain-matched control mice, whereas the lung CLDN5 transcript levels in the sensitive (BALB/cByJ) mice were not significantly different from control mice. *Significantly different (P < 0.0001) from strain-matched control mice as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method). (B) CLDN5 protein increased more at 12 hours in 129X1/SvJ than in BALB/cByJ mouse lung as determined by Western blot. Each lane represents protein from a single mouse. (C) CLDN5 protein increased more at 12 hours in 129X1/SvJ than in BALB/cByJ mouse lung. Each test was repeated four times and quantified using ImageQuant 5.2 software (Typhoon 9410; GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). Values are mean ± SE (n = 4) normalized to β-actin. *Significantly different (P < 0.05) from strain-matched control mice (0 h) as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method). **Significantly different (P < 0.001) between 12 hour–exposed 129X1/SvJ and 12 hour–exposed BALB/cByJ mice as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method).

Acrolein Alters CLDN5 Transcript Levels in EA.hy926 Hybrid Cells and Human Lung Microvascular Endothelial Cells

To begin to determine a mechanism by which acrolein altered CLDN5 transcripts, we exposed EA.hy926 cells (a hybrid cell line) or human lung microvascular endothelial cells to acrolein and measured CLDN5 transcript levels (Figure 4). Within 1 hour of exposure to 30 nM acrolein, CLDN5 transcripts increased and were significantly (P < 0.001) different from control (DPBS) in EA.hy926 cells (Figure 4A). This effect was dose dependent (Figure 4B), with CLDN5 mRNA increasing at doses from 1 to 30 nM acrolein (4 h) and decreasing at doses of 100 or 300 nM as compared with cells exposed to DPBS (control) alone. Similarly, in human lung microvascular endothelial cells, CLDN5 mRNA increased after 30 nM acrolein and CLDN5 mRNA decreased after 100 or 300 nM acrolein treatment (Figure 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Acrolein alters CLDN5 transcript in vitro. (A) Time course of acrolein-induced CLDN5 transcript increases in EA.hy926 cells. Cells were exposed to 30 nM acrolein for the indicated times, and mRNA was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Tests were repeated on three occasions. Values are mean ± SE (n = 12 dishes). *Significantly different (P < 0.001) from Dulbecco's PBS (control) as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method). (B) Dose response of acrolein-induced CLDN5 transcript in hybrid EA.hy926 cells. Cells were exposed to acrolein for 4 hours, and mRNA expression levels were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Tests were repeated on three occasions. Values are mean ± SE (n = 12 dishes). *Significantly different (P < 0.001) from control as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method). (C) Dose response of acrolein-induced CLDN5 transcript in human lung microvascular endothelial cells. Cells were exposed to acrolein for 4 hours, and mRNA was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Tests were repeated on three occasions. Values are mean ± SE (n = 12 dishes). *Significantly different (P < 0.001) from control as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method).

Acrolein Increased p-FOXO1 Protein in EA.hy926 Cells

Acrolein could activate a variety of signaling pathways that regulate the expression of junctional proteins. CLDN5 expression is normally enhanced by CTNNB1 or repressed by nonphosphorylated FOXO1 and CTNNB1 binding at sites in the proximal promoter (28). To determine whether acrolein could alter FOXO1 or CTNNB1 status, time- and dose-dependent effects on FOXO1 and CTNNB1 and their corresponding phosphorylated forms were measured in cells treated with acrolein. After 4 hours of exposure to 30 nM acrolein, p-FOXO1 protein increased, whereas FOXO1 protein levels were not significantly different from DPBS (control)-treated EA.hy926 cells (Figure 5A). Thus, the FOXO1 to p-FOX1 protein ratio decreased after 30 nM acrolein as compared with control (P < 0.001) (Figure 5C). Western immunoblots for CTNNB1 or p-CTNNB1 protein were unchanged by treatment with 30 nM acrolein (Figures 5A and 5B).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Phospho-forkhead box O1 (p-FOXO1) increased after 30 nM of acrolein treatment. (A) Western immunoblot with catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1 (CTNNB1), p-CTNNB1, FOXO1, p-FOXO1, or β-actin antibody in EA.hy926 cells treated with Dulbecco's PBS (control) or 30 nM acrolein. p-FOXO1 increased after 4 hours of 30 nM acrolein treatment. (B) Mean transcription factor CTNNB1 protein levels after 30 nM acrolein treatment. Open bar: CTNNB1. Closed bar: p-CTNNB1. Hatched bar: CTNNB1/p-CTNNB1 ratio. (C) Mean transcription factor FOXO1 protein levels after 30 nM acrolein treatment. Open bar: FOXO1. Closed bar: p-FOXO1; Hatched bar: FOXO1/p-FOXO ratio. Each test was repeated four times and quantified using ImageQuant 5.2 software (Typhoon 9410; GE Healthcare). Values are mean ± SE (n = 4) normalized to β-actin. *Significantly different (P < 0.001) from control as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method).

Acrolein Increased FOXO1 or CTNNB1, whereas p-FOXO1 or p-CTNNB1 Was Unchanged after Acrolein in EA.hy926 Cells

After 1 to 4 hours of exposure to 300 nM acrolein, FOXO1 protein increased, whereas p-FOXO1 protein levels were not significantly different from DPBS (control)-treated EA.hy926 cells (Figure 6). Cell viability as measured by a MTS-dehydrogenase enzyme assay of EA.hy926 cells treated with 3,000 nM acrolein or less was not significantly different from vehicle control (Figure E2). Similarly, CTNNB1 but not p-CTNNB1 increased with treatment (Figure 6B), and the ratio of CTNNB1 to p-CTNNB1 increased as compared with control (P < 0.001) (Figure 6B). The ratio of FOXO1 to p-FOXO1 increased as compared with control (P < 0.001) (Figure 6C).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Catenin (cadherin-associated protein), beta 1 (CTNNB1), and Forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) increased, whereas phospho-FOXO1 (p-FOXO1) and phospho-CTNNB1 (p-CTNNB1) were unchanged after treatment with 300 nM acrolein. (A) Western immunoblot with CTNNB1, p-CTNNB1, FOXO1, p-FOXO1, or β-actin antibody in EA.hy926 cells treated with Dulbecco's PBS (control) or 30 nM acrolein. CTNNB1 and FOXO1 increased at 1, 2, or 4 hours of 300-nM acrolein treatment. (B) Mean transcription factor CTNNB1 proteins after 300 nM acrolein treatment. Open bar: CTNNB1. Closed bar: p-CTNNB1. Hatched bar: CTNNB1/p-CTNNB1 ratio. (C) Mean transcription factor FOXO1 proteins after 300 nM acrolein treatment. Open bar: FOXO1. Closed bar: p-FOXO1. Hatched bar: FOXO1/p-FOXO ratio. Each test was repeated four times and quantified using ImageQuant 5.2 software (Typhoon 9410; GE Healthcare). Values are mean ± SE (n = 4) normalized to β-actin. *Significantly different (P < 0.01) from control as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method).

The Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Inhibitor Diminishes Acrolein-Induced Increased CLDN5 Transcript in EA.hy926 Cells

Induction of CLDN5 and p-FOXO1 was observed in EA.Hy926 cells treated with 30 nM acrolein (see Figures 4B and 5C). PI3K phosphorylates AKT, which in turn phosphorylates FOXO1 (and other transcription factors), and this signaling pathway can be inhibited by LY. To examine PI3K inhibition after acrolein treatment of EA.hy926 cells, cells were treated with 10 μM LY (30 min) and exposed to 30 nM acrolein (4 h). LY treatment diminished acrolein-induced CLDN5 mRNA (Figure 7). We also examined whether LY could inhibit p-AKT formation after acrolein treatment of EA.hy926. Acrolein increased p-AKT, and this effect was inhibited by LY addition (Figure E3).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor, LY294002 (LY), diminishes 30 nM acrolein-induced increased claudin 5 (CLDN5) transcript in EA.hy926 cells untreated (control) or cells treated with DMSO (vehicle), 30 nM acrolein, or 30 nM acrolein and LY. Cells were treated with vehicle (DMSO) or 10 μM LY 30 minutes before 30 nM acrolein treatment, and mRNA was analyzed by qRT-PCR. Tests were repeated four times on two occasions. Values are mean ± SE (n = 8 dishes). *Significantly different (P < 0.01) from vehicle (Dulbecco's buffered saline or DMSO) control as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Holm-Sidak method). **Significantly different (P < 0.01) from acrolein (without LY) as determined by ANOVA with an all pairwise multiple comparison procedure (Sidak-Scheffe method).

DISCUSSION

A major adverse event after smoke inhalation is delayed pulmonary edema and respiratory failure due to ALI (24). In fire victims surviving carbon monoxide poisoning, progressive pulmonary failure and cardiovascular dysfunction are important determinants of morbidity and mortality (25). ALI is marked by perivascular edema (20). This study focused on acrolein, which previously has been demonstrated to be the chemical responsible for pulmonary edema in smoke inhalation (26, 27). Endothelial junctional proteins play critical roles in tissue integrity and can regulate vascular permeability, leukocyte diapedesis, and angiogenesis (28). Endothelial cells express cell type–specific transmembrane junction proteins, including CLDN5 in tight junctions (15, 19) and cadherin 5, type 2 (vascular endothelium) (CDH5, a.k.a. VE-cadherin) at adhesion junctions (28). In concert with CDH5 (1, 29, 30) and other junctional proteins, CLDN5 controls vascular permeability in vitro and in vivo (1214). In the normal lung, CLDN5 is expressed strongly in endothelium and is considered a major contributor to the formation of tight junctions in these cells (15). Inducing CLDN5 expression in leaky rat lung endothelial cells can help to restore paracellular barrier function (19). The objective of this study was to determine the cell signal mechanism controlling endothelial CLDN5 expression during ALI.

We determined that the sensitivity of 12 inbred mouse strains to acrolein-induced ALI varied. The polar strains (sensitive: BALB/cByJ; resistant: 129X1/SvJ) differed more than 2-fold in survival time. After acrolein exposure, histological changes included perivascular edema and increased BAL protein, features consistent with ALI. These signs occurred earlier and were demonstrably greater in the sensitive strain compared with the resistant strain. This finding strongly supports the likelihood that an underlying genetic difference is linked to these phenotypes, much like we and others have found for other models of ALI (11, 3141). Future studies to expand the number of strains examined for single nucleotide polymorphisms mapping or to use crosses from these strains for quantitative trait loci analysis are clearly warranted.

Having obtained histological evidence that acrolein altered vascular permeability, we next measured CLDN5 transcripts in mouse lung and confluent endothelial cells. In vitro assays with human lung microvascular endothelial cells or EA.hy926 cells indicated that the CLDN5 transcript regulation was concentration dependent. At 30 nM acrolein, CLDN5 transcript levels increased. A similar increase was noted in mouse lung, which was greater in the resistant strain than in the sensitive strain. This initial CLDN5 induction can be considered a compensatory mechanism to mend junctional complexes and restore barrier function. At 300 nM acrolein in vitro, CLDN5 transcripts decreased, which would be detrimental to the maintenance of tight junction function.

To better understand the mechanism of CLDN5 regulation, we examined FOXO1 and CTNNB1 at 30 or 300 nM acrolein concentrations. FOXO1 integrates various cell signals critical to endothelial cell function at the transcriptional level (42). CLDN5 is expressed in the absence of nuclear accumulation of FOXO1 transcription factor. This is controlled by PI3K-mediated phosphorylation of AKT, which in turn mediates downstream phosphorylation of FOXO1 (p-FOXO1). p-FOXO1 can be retained in the cytoplasm or degraded after ubiquitination mediated, in part, by ring finger and WD repeat domain 2 (43). Consistent with this mechanism, treatment with a PI3K inhibitor (LY) diminished acrolein-induced AKT phosphorylation and increased CLDN5 transcript levels. This signaling can be enhanced by growth factors, including VEGFA, which has previously been demonstrated to increase markedly and may initiate edema during ALI (29, 4446).

In addition, CTNNB1 can be released from adhesion complexes during stress (47), relocates to the nucleus, and activates numerous critical survival events, including the transcription of CLDN5 (1). At 30 nM acrolein, CLDN5 transcripts and the ratio of p-FOXO1 to FOXO1 increased in EA.hy926 cells, which is consistent with such an outcome. With mounting stress, FOXO1 and CTNNB1 proteins accumulate in the cell, translocate to the nucleus, and partner to regulate target genes that promote stress resistance, cell cycle arrest, or apoptosis (4851). At 300 nM acrolein in vitro, CLDN5 transcripts decreased and FOXO1 and CTNNB1 increased in EA.hy926 cells, which is consistent with more severe outcome. The ultimate loss of CLDN5 in tight junctions by this mechanism can lead to disassembly of adhesive structures, endothelial barrier dysfunction, and ultimately increased vascular permeability.

The acrolein levels used in this study, 10 ppm in vivo and 1 to 300 nM in vitro, are relevant to human exposure. As an α,β-unsaturated 2-alkenal, acrolein is highly reactive in biological systems and can be extremely irritating (e.g., 0.06 ppm can cause eye irritation within 5 min) (5254). Acrolein can rapidly bind with macromolecules and disrupt critical cellular functions (5560). Acrolein is generated by combustion and is the major irritant in grassland and forest fires, high temperature cooking with oils (especially in woks), and diesel exhaust (26, 27, 61, 62). Over 30 million nonsmokers in the United States are exposed to acrolein concentrations in indoor air ranging from 0.8 to 1.5 ppm, and levels between 0.1 to 10 ppm have been detected in bars and restaurants (6367). Acrolein levels are elevated in second-hand smoke compared with mainstream smoke because side-stream smoke is generated at lower combustion temperatures (61, 64, 6870). The nanomolar acrolein concentrations used in this study also are relevant to endogenously generated levels in injured tissues (55, 56), which can result from amine oxidase–mediated catabolism of spermine or spermidine (7175), myeloperoxidase catabolism of threonine (7678), or, albeit less likely, oxidative degradation of membrane fatty acids (61, 7981). Acrolein-protein adducts accumulate in ischemic tissue (81, 82) and in atherosclerotic lesions (78, 83).

In summary, acrolein can induce ALI with perivascular edema in mice. This is accompanied by a compensatory increase in CLDN5 transcript and protein, which was more evident in a resistant than a sensitive mouse strain. In vitro, 30 nM acrolein stimulated phosphorylation of FOXO1 protein and increased CLDN5 transcripts, whereas 300 nM acrolein stimulated FOXO1 and CTNNB1 protein levels and decreased CLDN5 transcripts. These events are consistent with the rapid increase in vascular permeability and could provide a critical target for future pharmacological intervention during ALI.

Supplementary Material

[Online Supplement]

This study was supported by NIH grants ES013781 (A.B.); ES015675, HL077763, and HL085655 (G.L.); HL086981 (D.L.), and HL091938 (P.D.).

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0391OC on June 4, 2010

This article has an online supplement, which is accessible from this issue's table of contents at www.atsjournals.org

Author Disclosure: D.K. has received a sponsored grant from the NIH (more than $100,000). G.L. has served on the advisory board for the NIH (less than $1,000). None of the other authors has a financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Gavard J, Gutkind JS. VE-cadherin and claudin-5: it takes two to tango. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10:883–885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tsukita S, Furuse M, Itoh M. Multifunctional strands in tight junctions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001;2:285–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dejana E. Endothelial cell-cell junctions: happy together. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:261–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Argaw AT, Gurfein BT, Zhang Y, Zameer A, John GR. VEGF-mediated disruption of endothelial CLN-5 promotes blood-brain barrier breakdown. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:1977–1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosenberg GA, Yang Y. Vasogenic edema due to tight junction disruption by matrix metalloproteinases in cerebral ischemia. Neurosurg Focus 2007;22:E4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mankertz J, Schulzke JD. Altered permeability in inflammatory bowel disease: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2007;23:379–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Koval M, Ward C, Findley MK, Roser-Page S, Helms MN, Roman J. Extracellular matrix influences alveolar epithelial claudin expression and barrier function. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2009;42:172–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1334–1349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wray C, Mao Y, Pan J, Chandrasena A, Piasta F, Frank JA. Claudin-4 augments alveolar epithelial barrier function and is induced in acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009;297:L219–L227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tsushima K, King LS, Aggarwal NR, De Gorordo A, D'Alessio FR, Kubo K. Acute lung injury review. Intern Med 2009;48:621–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bein K, Wesselkamper SC, Liu X, Dietsch M, Majumder N, Concel VJ, Medvedovic M, Sartor MA, Henning LN, Venditto C, et al. Surfactant-associated protein B is critical to survival in nickel-induced injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2009;41:226–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Turksen K, Troy TC. Barriers built on claudins. J Cell Sci 2004;117:2435–2447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Furuse M, Tsukita S. Claudins in occluding junctions of humans and flies. Trends Cell Biol 2006;16:181–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Van Itallie CM, Anderson JM. Claudins and epithelial paracellular transport. Annu Rev Physiol 2006;68:403–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kaarteenaho-Wiik R, Soini Y. Claudin-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, and -7 in usual interstitial pneumonia and sarcoidosis. J Histochem Cytochem 2009;57:187–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Van Itallie C, Rahner C, Anderson JM. Regulated expression of claudin-4 decreases paracellular conductance through a selective decrease in sodium permeability. J Clin Invest 2001;107:1319–1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nitta T, Hata M, Gotoh S, Seo Y, Sasaki H, Hashimoto N, Furuse M, Tsukita S. Size-selective loosening of the blood-brain barrier in claudin-5-deficient mice. J Cell Biol 2003;161:653–660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Coyne CB, Gambling TM, Boucher RC, Carson JL, Johnson LG. Role of claudin interactions in airway tight junctional permeability. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2003;285:L1166–L1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Soma T, Chiba H, Kato-Mori Y, Wada T, Yamashita T, Kojima T, Sawada N. Thr(207) of claudin-5 is involved in size-selective loosening of the endothelial barrier by cyclic amp. Exp Cell Res 2004;300:202–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Uhl M, Roeren T, Limberg B, Kauffmann GW, Kucherer H, Meier-Willersen HJ. [Parapneumonic ARDS: the radiomorphologic transition of a pneumonia into an ARDS.] Radiologe 1994;34:73–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leikauf GD, Leming LM, O'Donnell JR, Doupnik CA. Bronchial responsiveness and inflammation in guinea pigs exposed to acrolein. J Appl Physiol 1989;66:171–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Borchers MT, Wesselkamper S, Wert SE, Shapiro SD, Leikauf GD. Monocyte inflammation augments acrolein-induced Muc5ac expression in mouse lung. Am J Physiol 1999;277:L489–L497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Borchers MT, Wert SE, Leikauf GD. Acrolein-induced MUC5ac expression in rat airways. Am J Physiol 1998;274:L573–L581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fein A, Leff A, Hopewell PC. Pathophysiology and management of complications resulting from fire and inhalation products of combustion: review of the literature. Crit Care Med 1980;2:94–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Enkhbaatar P, Traber DL. Pathophysiology of acute lung injury in combined burn and smoke inhalation injury. Clin Sci (Lond) 2004;107:137–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hales CA, Barkin PW, Jung W, Trautman E, Lamborghini D, Herrig N, Burke J. Synthetic smoke with acrolein but not HCl produces pulmonary edema. J Appl Physiol 1988;64:1121–1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hales CA, Musto SW, Janssens S, Jung W, Quinn DA, Witten M. Smoke aldehyde component influences pulmonary edema. J Appl Physiol 1992;72:555–561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Taddei A, Giampietro C, Conti A, Orsenigo F, Breviario F, Pirazzoli V, Potente M, Daly C, Dimmeler S, Dejana E. Endothelial adherens junctions control tight junctions by ve-cadherin-mediated upregulation of claudin-5. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10:923–934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Carmeliet P, Lampugnani MG, Moons L, Breviario F, Compernolle V, Bono F, Balconi G, Spagnuolo R, Oosthuyse B, Dewerchin M, et al. Targeted deficiency or cytosolic truncation of the VE-cadherin gene in mice impairs VEGF-mediated endothelial survival and angiogenesis. Cell 1999;98:147–157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Corada M, Mariotti M, Thurston G, Smith K, Kunkel R, Brockhaus M, Lampugnani MG, Martin-Padura I, Stoppacciaro A, Ruco L, et al. Vascular endothelial-cadherin is an important determinant of microvascular integrity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:9815–9820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barnes KC. Genetic determinants and ethnic disparities in sepsis-associated acute lung injury. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2005;2:195–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gao L, Barnes KC. Recent advances in genetic predisposition to clinical acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009;296:L713–L725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kleeberger SR, Levitt RC, Zhang LY, Longphre M, Harkema J, Jedlicka A, Eleff SM, DiSilvestre D, Holroyd KJ. Linkage analysis of susceptibility to ozone-induced lung inflammation in inbred mice. Nat Genet 1997;17:475–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kleeberger SR, Reddy S, Zhang LY, Jedlicka AE. Genetic susceptibility to ozone-induced lung hyperpermeability: role of toll-like receptor 4. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2000;22:620–627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Prows DR, Hafertepen AP, Gibbons WJ Jr, Winterberg AV, Nick TG. A genetic mouse model to investigate hyperoxic acute lung injury survival. Physiol Genomics 2007;30:262–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Prows DR, Hafertepen AP, Winterberg AV, Gibbons WJ Jr, Wesselkamper SC, Singer JB, Hill AE, Nadeau JH, Leikauf GD. Reciprocal congenic lines of mice capture the aliq1 effect on acute lung injury survival time. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2008;38:68–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Prows DR, Leikauf GD. Quantitative trait analysis of nickel-induced acute lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001;24:740–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prows DR, Shertzer HG, Daly MJ, Sidman CL, Leikauf GD. Genetic analysis of ozone-induced acute lung injury in sensitive and resistant strains of mice. Nat Genet 1997;17:471–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Savov JD, Whitehead GS, Wang J, Liao G, Usuka J, Peltz G, Foster WM, Schwartz DA. Ozone-induced acute pulmonary injury in inbred mouse strains. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2004;31:69–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wesselkamper SC, Chen LC, Gordon T. Quantitative trait analysis of the development of pulmonary tolerance to inhaled zinc oxide in mice. Respir Res 2005;6:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wesselkamper SC, Prows DR, Biswas P, Willeke K, Bingham E, Leikauf GD. Genetic susceptibility to irritant-induced acute lung injury in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000;279:L575–L582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Chen H, Lin AS, Li Y, Reiter CE, Ver MR, Quon MJ. Dehydroepiandrosterone stimulates phosphorylation of FoxO1 in vascular endothelial cells via phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase- and protein kinase a-dependent signaling pathways to regulate ET-1 synthesis and secretion. J Biol Chem 2008;283:29228–29238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kato S, Ding J, Pisck E, Jhala US, Du K. Cop1 functions as a FoxO1 ubiquitin E3 ligase to regulate FoxO1-mediated gene expression. J Biol Chem 2008;283:35464–35473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kaner RJ, Ladetto JV, Singh R, Fukuda N, Matthay MA, Crystal RG. Lung overexpression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene induces pulmonary edema. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2000;22:657–664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kosmidou I, Karmpaliotis D, Kirtane AJ, Barron HV, Gibson CM. Vascular endothelial growth factors in pulmonary edema: an update. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2008;25:259–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kunig AM, Balasubramaniam V, Markham NE, Seedorf G, Gien J, Abman SH. Recombinant human vegf treatment transiently increases lung edema but enhances lung structure after neonatal hyperoxia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2006;291:L1068–L1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nelson WJ, Nusse R. Convergence of wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science 2004;303:1483–1487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Nakae J, Biggs WH III, Kitamura T, Cavenee WK, Wright CV, Arden KC, Accili D. Regulation of insulin action and pancreatic beta-cell function by mutated alleles of the gene encoding forkhead transcription factor foxo1. Nat Genet 2002;32:245–253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Accili D, Arden KC. FoxOs at the crossroads of cellular metabolism, differentiation, and transformation. Cell 2004;117:421–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sedding DG. FoxO transcription factors in oxidative stress response and ageing: a new fork on the way to longevity? Biol Chem 2008;389:279–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Greer EL, Brunet A. FOXO transcription factors at the interface between longevity and tumor suppression. Oncogene 2005;24:7410–7425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Andre E, Campi B, Materazzi S, Trevisani M, Amadesi S, Massi D, Creminon C, Vaksman N, Nassini R, Civelli M, et al. Cigarette smoke-induced neurogenic inflammation is mediated by alpha,beta-unsaturated aldehydes and the TRPA1 receptor in rodents. J Clin Invest 2008;118:2574–2582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Steinhagen WH, Barrow CS. Sensory irritation structure-activity study of inhaled aldehydes in B6C3F1 and Swiss-Webster mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1984;72:495–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Weber A, Jermini C, Grandjean E. Irritating effects on man of air pollution due to cigarette smoke. Am J Public Health 1976;66:672–676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Deshmukh HS, McLachlan A, Atkinson JJ, Hardie WD, Korfhagen TR, Dietsch M, Liu Y, Di PY, Wesselkamper SC, Borchers MT, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 14 mediates a phenotypic shift in the airways to increase mucin production. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180:834–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Deshmukh HS, Shaver C, Case LM, Dietsch M, Wesselkamper SC, Hardie WD, Korfhagen TR, Corradi M, Nadel JA, Borchers MT, et al. Acrolein-activated matrix metalloproteinase 9 contributes to persistent mucin production. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2008;38:446–454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cohen SM, Garland EM, St John M, Okamura T, Smith RA. Acrolein initiates rat urinary bladder carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1992;52:3577–3581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Izard C, Libermann C. Acrolein. Mutat Res 1978;47:115–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Feng Z, Hu W, Hu Y, Tang MS. Acrolein is a major cigarette-related lung cancer agent: preferential binding at p53 mutational hotspots and inhibition of DNA repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:15404–15409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang HT, Zhang S, Hu Y, Tang MS. Mutagenicity and sequence specificity of acrolein-DNA adducts. Chem Res Toxicol 2009;22:511–517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Stevens JF, Maier CS. Acrolein: sources, metabolism, and biomolecular interactions relevant to human health and disease. Mol Nutr Food Res 2008;52:7–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tam BN, Neumann CM. A human health assessment of hazardous air pollutants in Portland, OR. J Environ Manage 2004;73:131–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ayer HE, Yeager DW. Irritants in cigarette smoke plumes. Am J Public Health 1982;72:1283–1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Faroon O, Roney N, Taylor J, Ashizawa A, Lumpkin MH, Plewak DJ. Acrolein environmental levels and potential for human exposure. Toxicol Ind Health 2008;24:543–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jermini C, Weber A, Grandjean E. [Quantitative determination of various gas-phase components of the side-stream smoke of cigarettes in the room air as a contribution to the problem of passive-smoking.] Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1976;36:169–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kensler CJ, Battista SP. Components of cigarette smoke with ciliary-depressant activity: their selective removal by filters containing activated charcoal granules. N Engl J Med 1963;269:1161–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nazaroff WW, Singer BC. Inhalation of hazardous air pollutants from environmental tobacco smoke in US residences. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 2004;14:S71–S77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Faroon O, Roney N, Taylor J, Ashizawa A, Lumpkin MH, Plewak DJ. Acrolein health effects. Toxicol Ind Health 2008;24:447–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Leikauf GD. Hazardous air pollutants and asthma. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110:505–526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Leikauf GD. Formaldehyde and other aldehydes. In: Lippmann M, editor. Environmental toxicants: human exposures and their health effects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2009. pp. 257–316.
  • 71.Houen G, Bock K, Jensen AL. HPLC and NMR investigation of the serum amine oxidase catalyzed oxidation of polyamines. Acta Chem Scand 1994;48:52–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Lee Y, Sayre LM. Reaffirmation that metabolism of polyamines by bovine plasma amine oxidase occurs strictly at the primary amino termini. J Biol Chem 1998;273:19490–19494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.O'Brien PJ, Siraki AG, Shangari N. Aldehyde sources, metabolism, molecular toxicity mechanisms, and possible effects on human health. Crit Rev Toxicol 2005;35:609–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sakata K, Kashiwagi K, Sharmin S, Ueda S, Igarashi K. Acrolein produced from polyamines as one of the uraemic toxins. Biochem Soc Trans 2003;31:371–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Tabor CW, Tabor H, Bachrach U. Identification of the aminoaldehydes produced by the oxidation of spermine and spermidine with purified plasma amine oxidase. J Biol Chem 1964;239:2194–2203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Vasilyev N, Williams T, Brennan ML, Unzek S, Zhou X, Heinecke JW, Spitz DR, Topol EJ, Hazen SL, Penn MS. Myeloperoxidase-generated oxidants modulate left ventricular remodeling but not infarct size after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2005;112:2812–2820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hazen SL, Hsu FF, d'Avignon A, Heinecke JW. Human neutrophils employ myeloperoxidase to convert alpha-amino acids to a battery of reactive aldehydes: a pathway for aldehyde generation at sites of inflammation. Biochemistry 1998;37:6864–6873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Shao B, Fu X, McDonald TO, Green PS, Uchida K, O'Brien KD, Oram JF, Heinecke JW. Acrolein impairs ATP binding cassette transporter A1-dependent cholesterol export from cells through site-specific modification of apolipoprotein A-I. J Biol Chem 2005;280:36386–36396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Esterbauer H, Schaur RJ, Zollner H. Chemistry and biochemistry of 4-hydroxynonenal, malonaldehyde and related aldehydes. Free Radic Biol Med 1991;11:81–128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Furuhata A, Nakamura M, Osawa T, Uchida K. Thiolation of protein-bound carcinogenic aldehyde: an electrophilic acrolein-lysine adduct that covalently binds to thiols. J Biol Chem 2002;277:27919–27926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Uchida K, Kanematsu M, Morimitsu Y, Osawa T, Noguchi N, Niki E. Acrolein is a product of lipid peroxidation reaction: formation of free acrolein and its conjugate with lysine residues in oxidized low density lipoproteins. J Biol Chem 1998;273:16058–16066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Luo J, Uchida K, Shi R. Accumulation of acrolein-protein adducts after traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurochem Res 2005;30:291–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Park YS, Taniguchi N. Acrolein induces inflammatory response underlying endothelial dysfunction: a risk factor for atherosclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1126:185–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Online Supplement]
supp_44_4_483__1.pdf (145.9KB, pdf)

Articles from American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology are provided here courtesy of American Thoracic Society

RESOURCES