Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol. 2009 Nov;43(7):547–554. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2009.09.029

Contribution of early environmental stress to alcoholism vulnerability

Joannalee C Campbell a, Karen K Szumlinski a,b, Tod E Kippin a,b,*
PMCID: PMC3096452  NIHMSID: NIHMS288463  PMID: 19913199

Abstract

The most problematic aspects of alcohol abuse disorder are excessive alcohol consumption and the inability to refrain from alcohol consumption during attempted abstinence. The root causes that predispose certain individuals to these problems are poorly understood but are believed to be produced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Early environmental trauma alters neurodevelopmental trajectories that can predispose an individual to a number of neuropsychiatric disorders, including substance abuse. Prenatal stress (PNS) is a well-established protocol that produces perturbations in nervous system development, resulting in behavioral alterations that include hyperresponsiveness to stress, novelty, and psychomotor stimulant drugs (e.g., cocaine, amphetamine). Moreover, PNS animals exhibit enduring alterations in basal and cocaine-induced changes in dopamine and glutamate transmission within limbic structures, which exhibit pathology in drug addiction and alcoholism, suggesting that these alterations may contribute to an increased propensity to self-administer large amounts of drugs of abuse or to relapse after periods of drug withdrawal. Given that cocaine and alcohol have actions on common limbic neural substrates (albeit by different mechanisms), we hypothesized that PNS would elevate the motivation for, and consumption of, alcohol. Accordingly, we have found that male C57BL/6J mice subject to PNS exhibit higher operant responding and consume more alcohol during alcohol reinforcement as adults. Alterations in glutamate and dopamine neurotransmission within the forebrain structures appear to contribute to the PNS-induced predisposition to high alcohol intake and are induced by excessive alcohol intake. Accordingly, we are exploring the interactions between neurochemical changes produced by PNS and changes induced by consumption of alcohol in adulthood to model the biological bases of high vulnerability to alcohol abuse.

Keywords: Alcohol, Alcoholism, Addiction, Prenatal stress, Development, Vulnerability

Introduction

Alcohol is one of the most widely abused drugs with approximately 14% of the general American population meeting criteria for alcohol dependence (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). A major problem involved in alcohol abuse disorder is excessive alcohol intake, which results in a range of consequences, including memory loss, blackouts, loss of consciousness, as well as damage to a number of organs, including the brain. A second major problem involved in alcohol abuse disorder is relapse, which is the rapid return to drinking, particularly to excessive drinking, during periods of attempted abstinence. Extensive use of animal models of alcohol abuse has provided insights into the mechanisms of alcohol action, the factors that determine individual vulnerability to alcoholism, and produced a method of screening potential therapeutic compounds. The present review summarizes our knowledge of the impact of early environmental stress as a risk factor for alcoholism and proposes that enduring alterations in corticolimbic glutamate induced by these stressors may mediate the increased vulnerability to alcohol abuse.

Prenatal stress enhances sensitivity to stressors and psychomotor stimulant drugs

Environmental stimuli during gestation and the early postnatal period have complex effects on developmental processes, resulting in permanent alterations in nervous system structure and function. In humans, children of mothers who experienced stress during gestation or early life stress exhibit alterations in early motor development, anomalies in brain morphology, and an increased risk of developing a range of neuropsychiatric disorders, including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, depression, sleep disturbances, cognitive dysfunction, increased anxiety, and substance abuse disorders (reviewed in Huizink et al., 2004; Seckl and Meaney, 2006; Weinstock, 2001, 2005). Extensive data from animal studies are consistent with such findings (reviewed in Huizink et al., 2004; Kofman, 2002; Seckl and Meaney, 2006; Weinstock, 2001, 2005; Welberg and Seckl, 2001): repeated maternal exposure to stress during the last week of gestation (prenatal stress [PNS]) induces behavioral sequelae including (but not limited to) neuroendocrine and behavioral hyperresponsiveness to stressors and novelty, increased anxiety, learning and memory impairments, altered circadian rhythm function, impaired sexual function, and enhanced responsiveness to the behavioral activating and reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse. Although human PNS effects appear to be more severe when the maternal stressor is present early in gestation (Glynn et al., 2001), the majority of the animal literature, particularly rodent models, relies on stress manipulations later in gestation. This shift in stress exposure relative to gestational milestones reflects the fact that human neural development is precocious compared with most other mammals (Clancy et al., 2001). As a comparison, the peak time of neuronal proliferation and migration occurs in the last trimester of rat development, whereas the equivalent burst occurs early in the second trimester for humans (Yager and Ashwal, 2009), requiring a substantial shift in stressor timing for rodent models to replicate the impact of stress on that aspect of human brain development.

Of particular interest is the increased risk of substance abuse disorders after early environmental stress. In rodent models, PNS increases the initial locomotor response to amphetamine, enhances sensitization to the locomotor effects of amphetamine, and increases amphetamine intake and operant responding during amphetamine reinforcement (Deminiere et al., 1992; Henry et al., 1995). We have found that PNS in rats increases the locomotor responsiveness to cocaine (in both cocaine-naive and -experienced individuals). Although PNS rats do not differ from controls regarding the amount of cocaine self-administered intravenously in standard operant procedures, these rats exhibit higher levels of cocaine seeking under extinction conditions and after a noncontingent cocaine-priming injection (Kippin et al., 2008). Similarly, studies using separation of offspring from their mothers during the early postnatal period have found that prolonged (3–6 h) episodes of neonatal separation produce heightened responsiveness to stressors similar to that observed with PNS. In contrast, brief (10–15 min) episodes of neonatal separation, which elicit increased maternal behavior directed toward the offspring, produce lowered responsiveness to stressors opposite to that observed with PNS in some studies (for reviews, see, e.g., Francis et al., 1996; Gutman and Nemeroff, 2002; Lehmann and Feldon, 2000). Moreover, prolonged postnatal separation produces enhanced cocaine self-administration and increased reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior (see, e.g., Flagel et al., 2003; Kosten et al., 2000; Lynch et al., 2005, but see also Matthews et al., 1999; Moffett et al., 2007). Thus, there are generally consistent findings supporting the notion that early life stress in animals can effectively model the heightened addiction vulnerability in humans subjected to adverse early life events.

PNS and alcohol reward

In contrast to the large amount of information available on the effects of PNS on stress and stimulant drug responsiveness, there is limited information regarding the impact of PNS on responsiveness to alcohol and alcohol intake. Although there are no studies definitively linking prenatal stress and vulnerability to alcoholism, large-scale studies documenting the impact of stress imposed by recent natural disasters (e.g., King and Laplante, 2005; Weems and Overstreet, 2008) on a variety of behavioral, cognitive, and mental health dimensions offer an opportunity to track the impact of time-specific early stressors on addiction vulnerability to a wide range of substances, including alcohol. Nevertheless, some studies have linked adverse early life events to a lack of resilience and that to later alcoholism (reviewed in Enoch, 2006; Tiet et al., 1998; Zimmermann et al., 2007; Zuker et al., 2008). However, it remains unclear if this propensity toward alcoholism reflects a specific vulnerability or general vulnerability to neuropsychiatric disease, as reflected by high comorbidity with other disorders (e.g., Cornelius et al., 2003; Krystal et al., 2006; Kushner et al., 2000; Schuckit, 2006).

Moreover, there are many behavioral components known to be influenced by PNS, both in humans and in animal models, which are themselves linked to greater propensity toward alcohol abuse and alcoholism. PNS is linked to increased anxiety, impulsivity, and mood disorders (for reviews, Beydoun and Saftlas, 2008; Weinstock, 2008), whereas anxiety sensitivity, depression, and avoidance coping strategies are themselves all predictive factors for higher alcohol consumption and a higher likelihood of an alcohol use disorder (Holahan et al., 2001; Schmidt et al., 2007). Two studies have reported that PNS blunts initial alcohol-induced hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis activation, ataxia, and hypothermia (DeTurck and Pohercky, 1987; Van Waes et al., 2006). These findings suggest that PNS may produce lower initial sensitivity to alcohol, which along with clinical research indicating that initial responsiveness to alcohol (and other N-methyl-d-aspartate [NMDA] receptor antagonists) correlates with alcoholism vulnerability (for reviews, Krystal et al., 2003; Schuckit et al., 2004) suggests that PNS may serve as a useful model to assess alcoholism vulnerability due to initial alcohol responsiveness. A recent study conducted by Darnaudery et al. (2007) examined the long-term effects of PNS and its interaction with stressors on voluntary alcohol intake during continuous access in adult male and female rats. Under basal conditions, PNS rats did not differ from controls in terms of free-access alcohol intake, but a subgroup of PNS females that displayed initial high preference for alcohol further increased their intake when subjected to intense stressors as adults, whereas stress-induced changes in intake were not observed in PNS females exhibiting an initial low preference for alcohol or in PNS males, regardless of their initial alcohol preference (Darnaudery et al., 2007). Additionally, prolonged maternal separation during the early postnatal period increases alcohol intake during adulthood (Gustafsson and Nylander, 2006; Gustafsson et al., 2005; Huot et al., 2001; Jaworski et al., 2005; Ploj et al., 2003; Roman et al., 2003), whereas intake is decreased after brief (10–15 min) episodes of neonatal separation in some (Jaworski et al., 2005; Ploj et al., 2003), but not all, studies (Lancaster, 1998; Weinberg, 1987). Thus, the limited existing evidence suggests that PNS or maternal separation procedures that produce a similar endophenotype also produce increased vulnerability to alcoholism-related behaviors.

Importantly, prior studies have only assessed the impact of early environmental stress on alcohol intake in strains of rats that exhibit modest ingestion levels (e.g., averaging <5 g/kg/day of oral intake; Darnaudery et al., 2007; Gustafsson and Nylander, 2006; Roman et al., 2005), and thus, the use of animal models that exhibit higher basal intake in PNS experiments may facilitate modeling vulnerability to excessive alcohol consumption. Furthermore, previous studies have only examined alcohol intake under continuous access conditions and have not investigated the influence of early environmental stressors on subsequent alcohol intake under operant contingency, which facilitates assessment of the motivational processes involved in alcohol-seeking behavior.

Accordingly, our group has initiated experiments examining the impact of PNS on alcohol-reinforced operant behavior using C57BL/6J mice, which exhibit spontaneous high alcohol intake (>10 g/kg/day of oral intake) and high alcohol preference under a variety of experimental conditions (e.g., Fuller, 1964; Rodgers and McClearn, 1962). In our studies, pregnant dams are subjected to either no manipulations or repeated restraint stress (confinement to a small plastic tube for 1 h, three times per day, from E14 until delivery); then, the offspring remain with their mother until weaning at 21 days of age when they are separated in same-sex groups of three to four mice. Starting at 8 weeks of age, male mice are given access to an alcohol bottle (15% alcohol in water) or a water bottle in their home cage for 8 weeks. Under these conditions, we observed high levels of alcohol intake (greater than 12 g/kg/day) but no significant differences in these levels between PNS and control males (Campbell et al., 2009)—a finding consistent with that reported earlier in PNS rats (Darnaudery et al., 2007). However, when the mice are trained to press a lever in an operant chamber to receive alcohol reinforcement, substantial differences emerged between PNS and control males. Mice were initially trained to press a lever for oral sucrose reinforcement (20 μL of 15% wt/vol sucrose in water delivered into a small cup) for 15 min/day followed by a standard sucrose fading procedure (Samson, 1986) with oral ethanol (20 μL of 10% ethanol vol/vol in water delivered into a small cup) serving as the final reinforcer. Although the behavior of PNS and control male mice did not differ during sucrose reinforcement, PNS males responded on the active lever approximately 60% more than did controls and exhibited an approximate 137% increase in the amount of alcohol consumed during the operant session. These data indicate that, consistent with the higher operant responding for cocaine and amphetamine reported by our laboratory and others (as previously mentioned), PNS increases the motivation for, and intake of, alcohol when access is response contingent (Campbell et al., 2009). These data indicate that PNS procedures may be useful in elucidating factors contributing to the biological bases of high vulnerability to substance abuse, including alcoholism.

Future behavioral directions

The brief daily operant self-administration sessions used in our preliminary study of the effects of PNS on operant responding and alcohol intake in mice are temporally similar to “binge” models of excessive alcohol consumption that have been investigated elsewhere (see, e.g., Finn et al., 2005; Rhodes et al., 2005; Szumlinski et al., 2007), and thus, it is of interest to test PNS mice under these limited-access, response-noncontingent conditions as well. Furthermore, another major problem associated with alcoholism is its reoccurring nature that results in high levels of relapse during periods of attempted abstinence. Although current animal models have limitations (see for reviews, e.g., Epstein et al., 2006; Katz and Higgins, 2003), the propensity to relapse appears to be modeled by reinstatement of operant responding produced by reexposure to ethanol in a noncontingent fashion or “priming,” exposure to stressors, or during reexposure to alcohol-paired cues after response extinction. Given the higher levels of reinstatement of cocaine seeking produced in PNS rats relative to controls (Kippin et al., 2008), it is also of interest to determine if higher reinstatement of alcohol seeking is produced by PNS in C57BL/6J mice. However, the mouse studies to date have inconsistently observed drug-primed reinstatement after either noncontingent alcohol or cocaine reexposure (Finn et al., 2008; Fuchs et al., 2003; Highfield et al., 2002; Kruzich, 2007; Soria et al., 2008), although, like rats (for reviews, see, e.g., Lê and Shaham, 2002; See, 2005), reexposure to drug-associated cues (Finn et al., 2008; Fuchs et al., 2003; Heidbreder et al., 2007; Highfield et al., 2002; Kruzich, 2007; Sanchis-Segura et al., 2006; Tsiang and Janak, 2006; Zghoul et al., 2007) or exposure to stressors (Newton et al., 2008; Soria et al., 2008) produces substantial reinstatement of cocaine- or alcohol seeking in mice, and these latter paradigms may provide an avenue for investigating the interactions between PNS and alcohol “relapse” behavior. Finally, the importance of subject's sex in determining the responsiveness to alcohol intake and seeking has also been examined recently. Sex differences have important influences on the development of alcoholism (reviewed in, e.g., Witt, 2007). Evidence from animal models suggests that females may be biologically disposed to high vulnerability to the effects of alcohol and to engage in higher intake (see, e.g., Barr et al., 2004; Bell et al., 2003, 2006; Lancaster and Speigel, 1992; Wiren et al., 2006). Furthermore, sex differences interact with early postnatal stressors in determining responsiveness to stressors in adulthood (see, e.g., McCormick et al., 1995) and to alcohol (Darnaudery et al., 2007; also reviewed in Roman and Nylander, 2005). Accordingly, future experiments should also address potential interactions between PNS and sex on alcohol-seeking behavior in operant and/or binge models.

PNS effects on the limbic circuitry mediating addiction-related behaviors

The limbic system, comprising interconnected cortical, amygdalar, hippocampal, and striatal components using monoamine and amino acid neurotransmitters, is implicated strongly in the behavioral effects of alcohol, as well as other drugs of abuse (Koob, 2003; Lapish et al., 2006; McBride and Li, 1998). Previous research in our laboratory revealed that PNS in rats increases the propensity to relapse in an animal model of cocaine addiction, and this enduring behavioral consequence of the stressful experience during development was found to be associated with alterations in basal and/or drug-stimulated changes in extracellular dopamine and glutamate within the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAC) (Kippin et al., 2008). More specifically, PNS elevated basal and cocaine-induced increases in mesocorticolimbic dopamine that underwent greater sensitization after cocaine self-administration and withdrawal (Kippin et al., 2008). Similar results for both basal dopamine levels in the NAC and increases in NAC dopamine levels after amphetamine challenge in both adolescent and adult PNS rats have been recently reported by others (Silvagni et al., 2008). Conversely, PNS reduced basal NAC extracellular glutamate but enhanced cocaine-stimulated glutamate release in the NAC both before and after experience with cocaine self-administration (Kippin et al., 2008). Of note, the reduction in basal NAC glutamate and the rise in NAC glutamate in response to an acute cocaine challenge injection are two neuroadaptations observed typically in rodents with a history of repeated cocaine experience (e.g., for review, Kalivas et al., 2005). Such data suggest that PNS elicits enduring neurochemical abnormalities in limbic monoamine and glutamate transmission that might “presensitize” subsequent behavioral responsiveness to drugs of abuse.

Although discrepancies exist in the literature concerning the precise relationship between alcoholism vulnerability and limbic dopamine transmission (e.g., Boone et al., 1997; Gongwer et al., 1989; Katner and Weiss, 2001; Kiianmaa et al., 1995; McBride et al., 1986, 1995; Murphy et al., 1987; Smith and Weiss, 1999), accumulating evidence supports a potential link between limbic glutamate transmission and alcohol preference/consumption observed in genetic animal models. Evoked cortical glutamate release is approximately 50% higher in P versus NP rats, and this release is enhanced by alcohol in P rats but not in their NP counterparts (McBride et al., 1986). Moreover, comparisons of low–alcohol-drinking Fischer 344 versus Lewis rats (Selim and Bradberry, 1996) and of low–alcohol-drinking DBA2/J versus C57BL/6J mice (Kapasova and Szumlinski, 2008) revealed an increased capacity of acute or repeated alcohol injections to increase NAC levels of glutamate in high– versus low–alcohol-consuming strains. Conversely, pharmacological or genetic manipulations of the glutamate system that reduce aspects of alcohol reward in rodent models of alcoholism (e.g., glutamate receptor antagonists or deletion of glutamate receptor–associated genes) prevent the capacity of alcohol to elevate NAC glutamate transmission (Lominac et al., 2006; Szumlinski et al., 2005b). The consequences of PNS on alcohol-stimulated limbic dopamine and glutamate transmission have yet to be assessed. However, the fact that PNS produces enduring neurochemical abnormalities within brain regions analogous to those exhibiting pathologies in alcoholic individuals (e.g., Moselhy et al., 2001; Volkow et al., 1990) raises the distinct possibility that the enhanced motivation of PNS mice to self-administer alcohol (Campbell et al., 2009) may be related to enduring effects of this early developmental manipulation on PFC–NAC glutamate transmission.

PNS and Homer proteins: a link to alcoholism vulnerability?

Glutamate receptors, in particular the NMDA subtype of ionotropic glutamate receptors, are pharmacological targets for alcohol in the brain (e.g., Lovinger et al., 1989; Minami et al., 1998). Glutamatergic signaling involves extensive networks of proteins that constitute the postsynaptic density of asymmetric synapses, which comprise several scaffolding proteins that serve to integrate signaling through multiple receptor subtypes (see, e.g., Sheng and Hoogenraad, 2007), including those involved in dopamine and glutamate signaling (e.g., Hara and Pickel, 2005; Trudeau, 2004; reviewed in Ferre et al., 2007). Thus, likely potential mechanisms for PNS-induced alterations in alcohol-related behavior (Campbell et al., 2009) are differences in glutamate receptors, as well as their related postsynaptic density signaling/scaffolding proteins. To this end, PNS produces increased NMDA receptor and group 3 metabotropic glutamate receptor expression (Barros et al., 2004; Berger et al., 2002), which may both contribute to the enhancement of cocaine-stimulated glutamate release exhibited by PNS rats in our neurochemical study (Kippin et al., 2008). Furthermore, we have initiated investigations into the potential molecular bases of PNS-induced mesocorticolimbic glutamate/dopamine alterations by examining the effect of PNS on the expression of Homer proteins, which are crucial to the coordination of glutamate signaling within the postsynaptic density (see, e.g., Shiraishi-Yamaguchi and Furuichi, 2007) and regulate basal, as well as drug-induced changes in, extracellular glutamate within the PFC and NAC (for review, Szumlinski et al., 2008). Indeed, PNS produces regionally specific changes in specific Homer proteins within the brain of preadolescent female rats: upregulated in PFC, hippocampus, and amygdala but downregulated in striatum (Ary et al., 2007), and studies are ongoing to extend these data to adult animals of both sexes. Although the relevance of PNS-induced changes in limbic Homer expression for the heightened motivation for cocaine and alcohol exhibited by PNS rodents (Campbell et al., 2009; Kippin et al., 2008) is a topic of intense investigation in our laboratories, we know from a series of studies conducted in inbred C57BL/6J and hybrid mice that abnormalities in PFC Homer1 versus Homer2 expression alters cocaine-seeking behavior and PFC glutamate transmission (Ary et al., 2008; Lominac et al., 2005; Szumlinski et al., 2005a). Moreover, cocaine- or alcohol-induced changes in NAC Homer expression, particularly that of the rodent-specific Homer2b isoform, actively regulate both the rewarding/reinforcing and neurochemical-sensitizing properties of these two drugs of abuse (for review, Szumlinski et al., 2008). Such data have led to the working hypothesis that early environmental insults, such as repeated maternal stress, produce enduring changes in the expression of Homers and associated receptor molecules within limbic structures and that such changes increase vulnerability to the motivational properties of drugs and alcohol reward in adulthood.

Conclusions

Modeling early developmental trauma using the PNS procedure produces numerous neurobiological abnormalities within limbic structures of the brain that have implications for a host of neuropsychiatric conditions, including substance abuse and dependence. As observed for the psychomotor stimulant cocaine, PNS augments the motivational properties of alcohol when assessed in adulthood. Thus, early environmental insults, such as repeated maternal stress, can produce enduring changes in the function of neural circuits subserving goal-directed behaviors. Although the precise cellular and molecular underpinnings of the interactions between PNS and subsequent drug/alcohol exposure on brain function remain to be more completely characterized, the data to date support the use of PNS protocols to screen for potential targets involved in promoting or protecting against addiction/alcoholism vulnerability.

Acknowledgments

Funding for the cocaine and alcohol PNS studies described in this review was provided by National Alliance for Research on Sohizophrenia and Affective Disorders Young Investigator Awards to T.E.K. and K.K.S., as well as a pilot project grant from INIA-Stress to T.E.K.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC.: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ary AW, Aguilar VR, Szumlinski KK, Kippin TE. Prenatal stress alters limbo-corticostriatal Homer protein expression. Synapse. 2007;61:938–941. doi: 10.1002/syn.20439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ary AW, Lominac KD, Klugmann M, Szumlinski KK. Prefrontal cortex Homer2 over-expression enhances cocaine-seeking and produces abnormalities in extracellular glutamate. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 2008;767:11. [Google Scholar]
  4. Barr CS, Newman TK, Lindell S, Shannon C, Champoux M, Lesch KP, et al. Interaction between serotonin transporter gene variation and rearing condition in alcohol preference and consumption in female primates. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:1146–1152. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.11.1146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barros VG, Berger MA, Martijena ID, Sarchi MI, Pérez AA, Molina VA, et al. Early adoption modifies the effects of prenatal stress on dopamine and glutamate receptors in adult rat brain. J Neurosci Res. 2004;76:488–496. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell RL, Rodd ZA, Sable HJ, Schultz JA, Hsu CC, Lumeng L, et al. Daily patterns of ethanol drinking in periadolescent and adult alcohol-preferring (P) rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2006;83:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bell RL, Rodd-Henricks ZA, Kuc KA, Lumeng L, Li TK, Murphy JM, et al. Effects of concurrent access to a single concentration or multiple concentrations of ethanol on the intake of ethanol by male and female periadolescent alcohol-preferring (P) rats. Alcohol. 2003;29:137–148. doi: 10.1016/s0741-8329(03)00022-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berger MA, Barros VG, Sarchi MI, Tarazi FI, Antonelli MC. Long-term effects of prenatal stress on dopamine and glutamate receptors in adult rat brain. Neurochem Res. 2002;27:1525–1533. doi: 10.1023/a:1021656607278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beydoun H, Saftlas AF. Physical and mental health outcomes of prenatal maternal stress in human and animal studies: a review of recent evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008;22:438–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00951.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boone EM, Cook MN, Hou X, Jones BC. Sex and strain influence the effect of ethanol on central monoamines. J Stud Alcohol. 1997;58:590–599. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1997.58.590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell JC, Dunn CP, Nayak RR, Carnatean RJ, Lopez M, Becker HC, et al. Prenatal stress increases operant responding and alcohol intake during alcohol reinforcement in adult C57B6/J mice. San Diego: Annual Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism; June, 2009.2009. [Google Scholar]
  12. Clancy B, Darlington RB, Finlay BL. Translating developmental time across mammalian species. Neuroscience. 2001;105:7–17. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00171-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cornelius JR, Bukstein O, Salloum I, Clark D. Alcohol and psychiatric comorbidity. Recent Dev Alcohol. 2003;16:361–374. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47939-7_24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Darnaudery M, Louvart H, Defrance L, Leonhardt M, Morley-Fletcher S, Gruber SH, et al. Impact of an intense stress on ethanol consumption in female rats characterized by their prestress preference: modulation by prenatal stress. Brain Res. 2007;1131:181–186. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deminière JM, Piazza PV, Guegan G, Abrous N, Maccari S, Le Moal M, et al. Increased locomotor response to novelty and propensity to intravenous amphetamine self-administration in adult offspring of stressed mothers. Brain Res. 1992;586:135–139. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(92)91383-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. DeTurck KH, Pohorecky LA. Ethanol sensitivity in rats: effect of prenatal stress. Physiol Behav. 1987;40:407–410. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90069-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Enoch MA. Genetic and environmental influences on the development of alcoholism: resilience vs. risk. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1094:193–201. doi: 10.1196/annals.1376.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Epstein DH, Preston KL, Stewart J, Shaham Y. Toward a model of drug relapse: an assessment of the validity of the reinstatement procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;189:1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0529-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferre S, Agnati LF, Ciruela F, Lluis C, Woods AS, Fuxe K, et al. Neurotransmitter receptor heteromers and their integrative role in ‘local modules’: the striatal spine module. Brain Res Rev. 2007;55:55–67. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Finn DA, Belknap JK, Cronise K, Yoneyama N, Murillo A, Crabbe JC. A procedure to produce high alcohol intake in mice. Psychopharmacology. 2005;178:471–480. doi: 10.1007/s00213-004-2039-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Finn DA, Mark GP, Fretwell AM, Gililland-Kaufman KR, Strong MN, Ford MM. Reinstatement of ethanol and sucrose seeking by the neurosteroid allopregnanolone in C57BL/6 mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008;201:423–433. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1303-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Flagel SB, Vázquez DM, Robinson TE. Manipulations during the second, but not the first, week of life increase susceptibility to cocaine self- administration in female rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28:1741–1751. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Francis D, Diorio J, LaPlante P, Weaver S, Seckl JR, Meaney MJ. The role of early environmental events in regulating neuroendocrine development. Moms, pups, stress, and glucocorticoid receptors. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1996;794:136–152. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb32517.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fuchs RA, See RE, Middaugh LD. Conditioned stimulus-induced reinstatement of extinguished cocaine seeking in C57BL/6 mice: a mouse model of drug relapse. Brain Res. 2003;973:99–106. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)02560-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fuller JL. Measurement of alcohol preference in genetic experiments. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1964;57:85–88. doi: 10.1037/h0043100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Glynn LM, Wadhwa PD, Dunkel-Schetter C, Chicz-DeMet A, Sandman CA. When stress happens matters: effects of earthquake timing on stress responsivity in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:637–642. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.111066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gongwer MA, Murphy JM, McBride WJ, Lumeng L, Li TK. Regional brain contents of serotonin, dopamine, and their metabolites in the selectively bred high- and low-alcohol drinking lines of rats. Alcohol. 1989;6:317–320. doi: 10.1016/0741-8329(89)90089-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gustafsson L, Nylander I. Time-dependent alterations in ethanol intake in male wistar rats exposed to short and prolonged daily maternal separation in a 4-bottle free-choice paradigm. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30:2008–2016. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00247.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gustafsson L, Ploj K, Nylander I. Effects of maternal separation on voluntary ethanol intake and brain peptide systems in female Wistar rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005;81:506–516. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2005.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gutman DA, Nemeroff CB. Neurobiology of early life stress: rodent studies. Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2002;7:89–95. doi: 10.1053/scnp.2002.31781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hara Y, Pickel VM. Overlapping intracellular and differential synaptic distributions of dopamine D1 and glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in rat nucleus accumbens. J Comp Neurol. 2005;492:442–455. doi: 10.1002/cne.20740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Heidbreder CA, Andreoli M, Marcon C, Hutcheson DM, Gardner EL, Ashby CR., Jr Evidence for the role of dopamine D3 receptors in oral operant alcohol self-administration and reinstatement of alcohol-seeking behavior in mice. Addict Biol. 2007;12:35–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2007.00051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Henry C, Guegant G, Cador M, Arnauld E, Arsaut J, Le Moal M, et al. Prenatal stress in rats facilitates amphetamine-induced sensitization and induces long-lasting changes in dopamine receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res. 1995;685:179–186. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00430-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Highfield DA, Mead AN, Grimm JW, Rocha BA, Shaham Y. Reinstatement of cocaine seeking in 129X1/SvJ mice: effects of cocaine priming, cocaine cues and food deprivation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002;161:417–424. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1047-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Holahan CJ, Moos RH, Holahan CK, Cronkite RC, Randall PK. Drinking to cope, emotional distress and alcohol use and abuse: a ten-year model. J Stud Alcohol. 2001;62:190–198. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Huizink AC, Mulder EJ, Buitelaar JK. Prenatal stress and risk for psychopathology: specific effects or induction of general susceptibility? Psychol Bull. 2004;130:115–142. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Huot RL, Thrivikraman KV, Meaney MJ, Plotshy PM. Development of adult ethanol preference and anxiety as a consequence of neonatal maternal separation in Long Evans rats and reversal with antidepressant treatment. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2001;158:366–373. doi: 10.1007/s002130100701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jaworski JN, Francis DD, Brommer CL, Morgan ET, Kuhar MJ. Effects of early maternal separation on ethanol intake, GABA receptors and metabolizing enzymes in adult rats. Psychopharmacology. 2005;181:8–15. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-2232-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kalivas PW, Volkow N, Seamans J. Unmanageable motivation in addiction: a pathology in prefrontal-accumbens glutamate transmission. Neuron. 2005;45:647–650. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kapasova Z, Szumlinski KK. Strain differences in alcohol-induced neurochemical plasticity: a role for accumbens glutamate in alcohol intake. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32:617–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00620.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Katner SN, Weiss F. Neurochemical characteristics associated with ethanol preference in selected alcohol-preferring and -nonpreferring rats: a quantitative microdialysis study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25:198–205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Katz JL, Higgins ST. The validity of the reinstatement model of craving and relapse to drug use. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 2003;168:21–30. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1441-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kiianmaa K, Nurmi M, Nykänen I, Sinclair JD. Effect of ethanol on extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of alcohol-preferring AA and alcohol-avoiding ANA rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1995;52:29–34. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(95)00097-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. King S, Laplante DP. The effects of prenatal maternal stress on children's cognitive development: Project Ice Storm. Stress. 2005;8:35–45. doi: 10.1080/10253890500108391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kippin TE, Szumlinski KK, Kapasova Z, Rezner B, See RE. Prenatal stress enhances responsiveness to cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:769–782. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kofman O. The role of prenatal stress in the etiology of developmental behavioural disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2002;26:457–470. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(02)00015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Koob GF. Alcoholism: allostasis and beyond. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003;27:232–243. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000057122.36127.C2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Kosten TA, Miserendino MJ, Kehoe P. Enhanced acquisition of cocaine self-administration in adult rats with neonatal isolation stress experience. Brain Res. 2000;875:44–50. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(00)02595-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kushner MG, Abrams K, Borchardt C. The relationship between anxiety disorders and alcohol use disorders: a review of major perspectives and findings. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000;20:149–171. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kruzich PJ. Does response-contingent access to cocaine reinstate previously extinguished cocaine-seeking behavior in C57BL/6J mice? Brain Res. 2007;1149:165–171. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Krystal JH, D'Souza DC, Gallinat J, Driesen N, Abi-Dargham A, Petrakis I, et al. The vulnerability to alcohol and substance abuse in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. Neurotox Res. 2006;10:235–252. doi: 10.1007/BF03033360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Krystal JH, Petrakis IL, Krupitsky E, Schutz C, Trevisan L, D'Souza DC. NMDA receptor antagonism and the ethanol intoxication signal: from alcoholism risk to pharmacotherapy. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2003;1003:176–184. doi: 10.1196/annals.1300.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Lancaster FE. Sex differences in voluntary drinking by Long Evans rats following early stress. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998;22:830–836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Lancaster FE, Speigel KS. Sex differences in pattern of drinking. Alcohol. 1992;9:415–420. doi: 10.1016/0741-8329(92)90041-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Lapish CC, Seamans JK, Chandler LJ. Glutamate-dopamine cotransmission and reward processing in addiction. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30:1451–1465. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lê A, Shaham Y. Neurobiology of relapse to alcohol in rats. Pharmacol Ther. 2002;94:137–156. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(02)00200-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lehmann J, Feldon J. Long-term biobehavioral effects of maternal separation in the rat: consistent or confusing? Rev Neurosci. 2000;11:383–408. doi: 10.1515/revneuro.2000.11.4.383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lominac KD, Kapasova Z, Hannun RA, Patterson C, Middaugh LD, Szumlinski KK. Behavioral and neurochemical interactions between Group 1 mGluR antagonists and ethanol: potential insight into their anti-addictive properties. Drug Alcohol Dep. 2006;85:142–156. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lominac KD, Oleson EB, Pava M, Klugmann M, Schwarz MK, Seeburg PH, et al. Distinct roles for different Homer1 isoforms in behaviors and associated prefrontal cortex function. J Neurosci. 2005;25:11586–11594. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3764-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lovinger DM, White G, Weight FF. Ethanol inhibits NMDA-activated ion current in hippocampal neurons. Science. 1989;243:1721–1724. doi: 10.1126/science.2467382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lynch WJ, Mangini LD, Taylor JR. Neonatal isolation stress potentiates cocaine seeking behavior in adult male and female rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;30:322–329. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Matthews K, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ, Caine SB. Repeated neonatal maternal separation alters intravenous cocaine self-administration in adult rats. Psychopharmacology (Berlin) 1999;141:123–134. doi: 10.1007/s002130050816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. McBride WJ, Bodart B, Lumeng L, Li TK. Association between low contents of dopamine and serotonin in the nucleus accumbens and high alcohol preference. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19:1420–1432. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. McBride WJ, Li TK. Animal models of alcoholism: neurobiology of high alcohol-drinking behavior in rodents. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1998;12:339–369. doi: 10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v12.i4.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. McBride WJ, Murphy JM, Lumeng L, Li TK. Effects of ethanol on monoamine and amino acid release from cerebral cortical slices of the alcohol-preferring P line of rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1986;10:205–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1986.tb05072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. McCormick CM, Smythe JW, Sharma S, Meaney MJ. Sex-specific effects of prenatal stress on hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal responses to stress and brain glucocorticoid receptor density in adult rats. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1995;84:55–61. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(94)00153-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Minami K, Gereau RW, 4th, Minami M, Heinemann SF, Harris RA. Effects of ethanol and anesthetics on type 1 and 5 metabotropic glutamate receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;53:148–156. doi: 10.1124/mol.53.1.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Moffett MC, Vicentic A, Kozel M, Plotsky P, Francis DD, Kuhar MJ. Maternal separation alters drug intake patterns in adulthood in rats. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:321–330. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Moselhy HF, Georgiou G, Kahn A. Frontal lobe changes in alcoholism: a review of the literature. Alcohol Alcohol. 2001;36:357–368. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/36.5.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Murphy JM, McBride WJ, Lumeng L, Li TK. Alcohol preference and regional brain monoamine contents of N/Nih heterogeneous stock rats. Alcohol Drug Res. 1987;7:33–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Newton PM, Zeng L, Wang V, Connolly J, Wallace MJ, Kim C, et al. A blocker of N- and T-type voltage-gated calcium channels attenuates ethanol-induced intoxication, place preference, self-administration, and reinstatement. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11712–11719. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3621-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ploj K, Roman E, Nylander I. Long-term effects of maternal separation on ethanol intake and brain opioid and opamine receptors in male Wistar rats. Neuroscience. 2003;121:787–799. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00499-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rhodes JS, Best K, Belknap JK, Finn DA, Crabbe JC. Evaluation of a simple model of ethanol drinking to intoxication in C57BL/6J mice. Physiol Behav. 2005;84:53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rodgers DA, McClearn GE. Mouse strain differences in preference for various concentrations of alcohol. QJ Stud Alcohol. 1962;23:26–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Roman E, Hyytia P, Nylander I. Maternal separation alters acquisition of ethanol intake in male ethanol-preferring AA rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003;27:31–37. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000047352.88145.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Roman E, Nylander I. The impact of emotional stress early in life on adult voluntary ethanol intake—results of maternal separation in rats. Stress. 2005;8:157–174. doi: 10.1080/10253890500188666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Samson HH. Initiation of ethanol reinforcement using a sucrose-substitution procedure in food- and water-sated rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1986;10:436–442. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1986.tb05120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sanchis-Segura C, Borchardt T, Vengeliene V, Zghoul T, Bachteler D, Gass P, et al. Involvement of the AMPA receptor GluR-C subunit in alcohol-seeking behavior and relapse. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1231–1238. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4237-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Schmidt NB, Bunkner JD, Keough ME. Anxiety sensitivity as a prospective predictor of alcohol use disorders. Behav Modif. 2007;31:202–219. doi: 10.1177/0145445506297019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Schuckit MA. Comorbidity between substance use disorders and psychiatric conditions. Addiction. 2006;101(Suppl 1):76–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01592.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Schuckit MA, Smith TL, Kalmijn J. The search for genes contributing to the low level of response to alcohol: patterns of findings across studies. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2004;28:1449–1458. doi: 10.1097/01.alc.0000141637.01925.f6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Seckl JR, Meaney MJ. Glucocorticoid “programming” and PTSD risk. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1071:351–378. doi: 10.1196/annals.1364.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. See RE. Neural substrates of cocaine-cue associations that trigger relapse. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;526:140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2005.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Selim M, Bradberry CW. Effect of ethanol on extracellular 5-HT and glutamate in the nucleus accumbens and prefrontal cortex: comparison between the Lewis and Fischer 344 rat strains. Brain Res. 1996;716:157–164. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)01385-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Sheng M, Hoogenraad CC. The postsynaptic architecture of excitatory synapses: a more quantitative view. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:823–847. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060805.160029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Shiraishi-Yamaguchi Y, Furuichi T. The Homer family proteins. Genome Biol. 2007;8:206. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Silvagni A, Barros VG, Mura C, Antonelli MC, Carboni E. Prenatal restraint stress differentially modifies basal and stimulated dopamine and noradrenaline release in the nucleus accumbens shell: an ‘in vivo’ microdialysis study in adolescent and young adult rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28:744–758. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Smith AD, Weiss F. Ethanol exposure differentially alters central monoamine neurotransmission in alcohol-preferring versus -nonpreferring rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288:1223–1228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Soria G, Barbano MF, Maldonado R, Valverde O. A reliable method to study cue-, priming-, and stress-induced reinstatement of cocaine self- administration in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2008;199:593–603. doi: 10.1007/s00213-008-1184-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Szumlinski KK, Ary AW, Lominac KD. Homers regulate drug-induced neuroplasticity: implications for addiction. Biochem Pharmacol. 2008;75:112–133. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2007.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Szumlinski KK, Diab ME, Friedman R, Henze LM, Lominac KD, Bowers MS. Accumbens neurochemical adaptations produced by binge-like alcohol consumption. Psychopharmacology. 2007;190:415–431. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0641-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Szumlinski KK, Lominac KD, Kleschen M, Oleson EB, Dehoff M, Schwartz M, et al. Behavioural and neurochemical phenotyping of Homer1 mutant mice: possible implications for schizophrenia. Genes Brain Behav. 2005a;4:273–288. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2005.00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Szumlinski KK, Lominac KD, Oleson EB, Walker JK, Mason A, Dehoff MH, et al. Homer2 is necessary for ethanol-induced neuroplasticity. J Neurosci. 2005b;25:7054–7061. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1529-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Tiet QQ, Bird HR, Davies M, Hoven C, Cohen P, Jensen PS, et al. Adverse life events and resilience. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998;37:1191–1200. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199811000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Trudeau LE. Glutamate co-transmission as an emerging concept in monoamine neuron function. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2004;29:296–310. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Tsiang MT, Janak PH. Alcohol seeking in C57BL/6 mice induced by conditioned cues and contexts in the extinction-reinstatement model. Alcohol. 2006;38:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2006.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Van Waes V, Enache M, Dutriez I, Lesage J, Morley-Fletcher S, Vinner E, et al. Hypo-response of the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenocortical axis after an ethanol challenge in prenatally stressed adolescent male rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:1193–1200. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04973.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Volkow ND, Hitzemann R, Wolf AP, Logan J, Fowler JS, Christman D, et al. Acute effects of ethanol on regional brain glucose metabolism and transport. Psychiatry Res. 1990;35:39–48. doi: 10.1016/0925-4927(90)90007-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Weems CF, Overstreet S. Child and adolescent mental health research in the context of Hurricane Katrina: an ecological needs-based perspective and introduction to the special section. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008;37:487–494. doi: 10.1080/15374410802148251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Weinberg J. Effects of early experience on responsiveness to ethanol: a preliminary report. Physiol Behav. 1987;40:401–406. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90068-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Weinstock M. Alterations induced by gestational stress in brain morphology and behaviour of the offspring. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;65:427–451. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(01)00018-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Weinstock M. The potential influence of maternal stress hormones on development and mental health of the offspring. Brain Behav Immun. 2005;19:296–308. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Weinstock M. The long-term behavioural consequences of prenatal stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32:1073–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Welberg LA, Seckl JR. Prenatal stress, glucocorticoids and the programming of the brain. J Neuroendocrinol. 2001;13:113–128. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2001.00601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Wiren KM, Hashimoto JG, Alele PE, Devaud LL, Price KL, Middaugh LD, et al. Impact of sex: determination of alcohol neuroadaptation and reinforcement. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30:233–242. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00032.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Witt ED. Puberty, hormones, and sex differences in alcohol abuse and dependence. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2007;29:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2006.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Yager JY, Ashwal S. Animal models of perinatal hypoxicischemic brain damage. Pediatr Neurol. 2009;40:156–167. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2008.10.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Zghoul T, Abarca C, Sanchis-Segura C, Albrecht U, Schumann G, Spanagel R. Ethanol self-administration and reinstatement of ethanol-seeking behavior in Per1(Brdm1) mutant mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2007;190:13–19. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0592-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Zimmermann US, Blomeyer D, Laucht M, Mann KF. How gene-stress-behavior interactions can promote adolescent alcohol use: the roles of predrinking allostatic load and childhood behavior disorders. Pharm Biochem Behav. 2007;86:246–262. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Zuker RA, Donovan JE, Masten AS, Mattson ME, Moss HB. Early developmental processes and the continuity of risk for underage drinking and problem drinking. Pediatrics. 2008;121(Suppl 4):S225–S272. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2243B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES