Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 19.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2010 Jul 19;49(31):5362–5366. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001675

Porous Metal Carboxylate Boron Imidazolate Frameworks (MC-BIFs)

Shoutian Zheng 1, Tao Wu 2, Jian Zhang 3, Mina Chow 4, Ruben A Nieto 5, Pingyun Feng 6,, Xianhui Bu 7,
PMCID: PMC3097175  NIHMSID: NIHMS283250  PMID: 20583020

Abstract

Integrated Material for Efficient CO2 Storage A new family of porous materials with tunable gas sorption properties have been made by integrating metal carboxylates and boron imidazolates under hydro- or solvothermal conditions. One hydrothermally synthesized phase exhibits a very high volumetric CO2 storage capacity at 81 L/L (273K, 1atm).

Keywords: Porous, Metal-organic framework, Carboxylate, Boron, Imidazolate


Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted considerable interest because of their intriguing structures and potential applications.[1] Of particular importance is the design and synthesis of MOFs with novel composition and topology, because properties and applications of such materials depend on their unique composition and topology. Among MOFs, metal-carboxylate frameworks (MCFs) constitute one of the most important subclasses and have been studied extensively.[26] Some well-known porous MCFs include HKUST-1,[3a] MOF-5,[3b] and MIL-101.[3c] In addition to MCFs, porous frameworks constructed from heterocyclic ligands (e.g., zeolitic imidazolate frameworks, ZIFs) and di- and trivalent cations such as Zn2+ and In3+,[7,8] have also been developed. More recently, boron imidazolate frameworks (BIFs) based on boron imidazolate complexes were reported.[9] Ultra-lightweight elements such as B and Li (e.g., in BIF-9 with the zeolite RHO net), together with the strong covalent bond (B-N) hold promise for the development of stable low-density porous solids with potential applications such as on-board gas storage materials.

In MCFs, ZIFs, and BIFs, crosslinking ligands (carboxylates, imidazolates, and boron imidazolates, respectively) have different properties, leading to porous frameworks with distinct structural features and properties. Here, we are interested in unifying these different structural modes in the same framework to create a family of materials called metal carboxylate boron imidazolate frameworks (MC-BIFs). Such a multi-component system can lead to greater compositional and topological diversity. As a first step, divalent metal ions widely used for MCFs and ZIFs are chosen for this work, because M2+ ions have a strong affinity for both carboxylates and imidazolates, making it possible to combine carboxylate and [B(im)4] inthe same framework without phase separation.

Another consideration involves the local charge distribution and overall charge of the target framework. Since [B(im)4] readily forms neutral zeolite-type frameworks with monovalent Li and Cu ions (e.g., LiB(im)4), the combination of higher charged metal ions such as Zn2+ with [B(im)4] would likely result in positively charged structural subunits (chains, layers, or even 3D frameworks). The introduction of di- or polycarboxylates with a higher charge density (2-, -3, … per ligand) than imidazolates (−1 per ligand) can provide charge compensation for the positively charged M2+/[B(im)4] subunits, leading to the formation of neutral MC-BIFs.

Here, we report a family of MC-BIFs that integrate both carboxylate and imidazolate building blocks. MC-BIF-1S through MC-BIF-5H all possess 3D framework structures, while MC-BIF-6S has a 3-connected ladder-like structure. Noteworthy is the use of both hydro- and solvothermal conditions in this work. MOFs are generally prepared under solvothermal conditions and many have limited hydrothermal stability. Since the hydrothermal stability is key to some applications of MOFs, it has been desirable to synthesize MOFs under hydrothermal conditions. Here, MC-BIF-1S, MC-BIF-4S, and MC-BIF-6S were solvothermally synthesized while MC-BIF-2H, MC-BIF-3H, and MC-BIF-5H were made by hydrothermal synthesis.

Chiral MC-BIF-1S is the first example that integrates the bonding features in all three families of materials (i.e., MCFs, ZIFs, and BIFs). Despite such a complex composition, its topology is very simple. One fundamental feature of MC-BIF-1S is the pentagonal layer parallel to the ab-plane (Figure 1a). Within the layer, only pentagonal rings consisting of two B and three Zn sites are observed, and each Zn2+ site is bonded to two [B(im)4] complexes and one free im ligands (“free” means that this imidazolate ligand is not a part of the covalent [B(im)4] complex). Each boron site is 4-connected to four separate Zn sites.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) and (b) View of 2D B/im/Zn layer and 3D structure of MC-BIF-1S, respectively. ZnN3O tetrahedron: yellow; BN4 tetrahedron: blue. (c) and (d) View of 1D B/im/Zn chain and 3D structure of MC-BIF-2H, respectively. All 2-connected im ligands were simplified as lines. (e) View of 3D structure of MC-BIF-3H. (f) and (g) View of 1D B/im/Cd tube and 3D structure of MC-BIF-4S, respectively. The neutral Him and p-murea are omitted for clarity. (h) View of 3D structure of MC-BIF-5. (k) 1D double-chain structure in MC-BIF-6S.

The aforementioned pentagonal layer was previously observed in ZBIF-1 with the formula of Zn2(im)Cl2[B(im)4].[10] However, because of the rich chloride environment in the deep eutectic solvent (choline chloride/N,N′-dimethylurea) used for the synthesis of ZBIF-1, the fourth Zn2+ coordination site in ZBIF-1 is terminated by Cl, leading to an overall lamella structure. By replacing terminal Cl anions with crosslinking ligands, it should be possible to convert 2D ZBIF-1 into a 3D framework. In this work, we have identified a unique crosslinker-solvent combination that allowed us to achieve this goal. By eliminating the Cl source and employing a unique solvent, 1,3-dimethyl-propyleneurea, the B/im/Zn pentagonal layers have been pillared through Zn-bdc-Zn linkages (Table 1) into a 3D framework called MC-BIF-1S here (Figure 1b).

Table 1.

A Summary of Crystal Data and Refinement Results.[a]

Compound Formula Sp. Gr. a (A) b (A) c (A) α (°) β (°) γ (°) R(F)
MC-BIF-1S [Zn2(im)(bdc)][B(im)4]·p-murea P43212 13.0584(18) 13.0584(18) 53.7310(11) 90 90 90 8.00%
MC-BIF-2H [Zn3(bdc)2(H2O)][B(im)4]2·2H2O C2/c 13.1669(14) 21.2270(2) 18.2540(2) 90 106.787(7) 90 5.17%
MC-BIF-3H [Zn2(btc)][B(im)4]·3H2O P21/c 11.8587(15) 13.7752(16) 16.7460(2) 90 96.469(7) 90 5.42%
MC-BIF-4S [Cd(Him)(p-murea)][Cd(bdc)1.5]- [B(im)4]·p-murea P-1 9.3195(2) 14.2603(2) 18.4982(4) 105.307(1) 99.077(1) 95.406(1) 3.67%
MC-BIF-5H [Cd2(bdc)(Hbdc)][B(im)4]·0.5H2O P21/c 8.8738(5) 18.3991(9) 20.1384(10) 90 98.843(1) 90 3.22%
MC-BIF-6S [Zn(OAC)][B(im)4] Pnma 13.5313(7) 9.9802(5) 12.7491(7) 90 90 90 4.15%
[a]

im = imidazolate; bdc = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate; btc = 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate; p-murea = 1,3-dimethyl-propyleneurea; OAC = CH3COO

MC-BIF-2H illustrates the effect of solvents on the self-assembly process in the Zn-[B(im)4]-bdc system. Compared to MC-BIF-1S, one notable difference is that the free imidazolate ligand (in the form of Zn-im-Zn) is no longer present, suggesting the possible lower hydrothermal stability the M(II)-im-M(II) linkage, as compared to the M(II)-im-B(III) linkage. Another difference is the coordination of water to one of two unique Zn sites, an obvious effect of the hydrothermal synthesis (Figure S2). Each Zn1 ion is coordinated to four im ligands and one water molecule to form a distorted trigonal bipyramidal configuration, while each Zn2 ion is tetrahedrally bonded to two im ligands and two O donors from two bdc ligands. As shown in Figure 1c, two Zn1 ions are bridged together by two [B(im)4] groups to form a four-ring, which further extends into a 1D B/im/Zn chain by sharing zinc corners. Next, each 1D Zn/[B(im)4] chain is connected to four adjacent chains via Zn2 ions to yield a 3D Zn/[B(im)4] framework with 1D channels in which the bdc ligands are located (Figure 1d, S3). Such bdc ligands bridge Zn2 ions by completing their two remaining coordination sites. It is worth noting that even without considering crosslinking by dicarboxylates, the connectivity between Zn2+ and [B(im)4] alone is 3D.

MC-BIF-1S and MC-BIF-2H demonstrate the feasibility to synthesize MC-BIFs under hydrothermal or solvothermal conditions. We then further examined the versatility of our synthetic method by expanding from the dicarboxylate system to the tricarboxylate system, leading to the hydrothermal synthesis of MC-BIF-3H. Again, as in MC-BIF-2H, there is no M(II)-im-M(II) in MC-BIF-3H, consistent with our earlier observation of possibly higher hydrothermal stability of M(II)-im-B than that of M(II)-im-M(II).

MC-BIF-3H can be considered as built from the 2D B/im/Zn layer pillared by the carboxylate ligands. There are two unique tetrahedral zinc sites (Figure S4), which are bonded to two N and two O atoms from two im and two btc ligands. MC-BIF-3H consists of two types of macrocyclic B4Zn4(im)8 eight-rings (Figure S5): one is a square-type eight-ring and the other is an elongated narrow-type eight-ring. Every square-type eight-ring shares its four edges with four narrow-type eight-rings, and vice versa, resulting in 2D Zn/[B(im)4] layers that are further linked by btc ligands to yield a 3D structure (Figure 1e).

When using mixed crosslinking ligands, their ratio and the role of each ligand in determining the dimensionality of the overall framework are of significance in the control of framework composition and topology. As discussed above, in MC-BIF-1S and MC-BIF-3H, the M2+/im/B connectivity is 2D and the connectivity in the third dimension is established by bridging carboxylate ligands. In comparison, MC-BIF-2H possesses the 3D M2+/im/B connectivity with the charge-balancing carboxylate ligand completing the remaining Zn coordination sites.

Here we demonstrate that the competing role of different ligands (i.e., carboxylates and imidazolates) can be tuned. Specifically, it is possible to broaden the dimensionality of M2+/im/B connectivity to include 1D, and in the meantime to increase the dimensionality of the M2+/carboxylate connectivity. Such a change in the dimensionality of the metal-ligand substructure connectivity is generally accompanied by a change in the carboxylate/B(im)4 ratio within the framework. Here, the use of a metal ion (Cd2+ in this work) with the ionic radius larger than Zn2+ offers an insight into the correlation between the overall structure and its atomic building block.

The use of Cd2+ to vary the carboxylate/B(im)4 ratio and to tune the dimensionality of M2+/carboxylate and M2+/B/im substructures can involve the following two factors: (1) the carboxylate can be the chelating ligand whereas [B(im)4] can not; (2) because of the larger ionic radius, Cd2+ has a greater tendency to form a chelate than Zn2+. These two factors are likely the reason for the increased carboxylate/B(im)4 ratio and a reduction in the M2+/im/B connectivity to 1D in two new MC-BIFs made with Cd2+ (in all zinc compounds here, the carboxylate/B(im)4 ratio = 1).

MC-BIF-4S and MC-BIF-5H, in which the carboxylate/B(im)4 ratio is 1.5 and 2, respectively, are constructed from 1D Cd2+/[B(im)4] tubes linked by bdc ligands into 3D structures. In MC-BIF-4S, there are two unique Cd sites (Figure S6). The 6-coordinate Cd1 only serves as a 3-connected node to two B atoms and one Cd atom via two im ligands (non-chelating) and one bdc ligand (chelating), respectively. There are two terminal ligands, one Him and one p-murea. The 5-coordinate Cd2 acts as a 4-connected node crosslinked to two B atoms and two Cd atoms via two im ligands and two bdc ligands, respectively. Thus, the 3D structure of MC-BIF-4S can be described as follows. First, as shown in Figure 1f, every two Cd1 ions and two [B(im)4] groups are alternately joined together via Cd-im-B linkages to form a B2Cd2(im)8 four-ring. Then, the adjacent four-rings are further bridged by two Cd2 ions along the a-axis to generate an infinite B/im/Cd tube. Finally, these tubes are crosslinked along the b- and c-directions to generate a 3D framework (Figure 1g). This structural feature of MC-BIF-4S is similar to a recently reported zincophosphate constructed from 1D zinc phosphate four-ring columns interlinked by organic ligands.[11]

By switching from solvothermal to hydrothermal method in the Cd system, a new 3D structure MC-BIF-5H was obtained. The structure of 1D B/im/Cd tube in MC-BIF-5H is similar to that in MC-BIF-4S (Figure S7). These B/im/Cd tubes are further joined together via COO groups to form a 3D framework (Figure 1h). The effect of hydrothermal synthesis again reveals itself through the inclusion of water molecules in MC-BIF-5H.

From MC-BIF-1S through MC-BIF-5H, the bridging di- or tricarboxylates are used. With the monocarboxylate ligand (acetate in this case), it is possible to obtain crystals that contain isolated low-dimensional M/carboxylate/B(im)4 structures that are potential structural building blocks in higher dimensional structures. One such structure is MC-BIF-6S with a 1D double-chain structure. MC-BIF-6S is made up of {[Zn(OAC)2]2[B(im)4]2} four-rings (Figure 2k). Similar four-ring structures are also observed in MC-BIF-2H, MC-BIF-4S and MC-BIF-5H. However, unlike corner-sharing four-rings in MC-BIF-2H or isolated four-rings in MC-BIF-4S and -5H, four-rings in MC-BIF-6S share edges to form a ladder-type structure.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) CO2 adsorption isotherms of MC-BIF-2H (■), MC-BIF-3H (●) and MC-BIF-5H (▲). (b) H2, adsorption (■●▲) and desorption (□○△) isotherms of MC-BIF-2H, MC-BIF-3H, and MC-BIF-5H.

The total potential solvent accessible volumes of solvothermal products MC-BIF-1S and MC-BIF-4S, calculated with PLATON,[12] are 52.2% and 47.8%, respectively. In comparison, the potential solvent accessible volumes of hydrothermal products (MC-BIF-2H: 13.7%; MC-BIF-3H: 18.7%; MC-BIF-5H: 11.3%) are much smaller, which may be related to the size of the solvent molecule. However, as shown below, the actual measured porosity does not correlate with the calculated trend, which is likely caused by the pore geometry and the degree of solvent removal in each case.

Gas adsorption measurements (H2, CO2, and N2) were performed on a Micromeritics ASAP 2010 surface-area and pore-size analyzer, which confirmed the permanent microporosity of MC-BIF-2H, MC-BIF-3H, and MC-BIF-5H (Figure 2). These samples were degassed at 150 °C for 24 h under vacuum prior to the measurement. Figure 2 shows the dependence of gas sorption properties on the crystal structure. The maximum CO2 adsorptions of MC-BIF-2H, MC-BIF-3H and MC-BIF-5H at 273 K and 1 atm are 54.3, 36.4 and 5.3 cm3g−1, respectively. The CO2 uptake capacity, especially the volumetric storage capacity, of MC-BIF-2H (81 L/L) at 1 atm and 273 K is very high, particularly considering its relatively low percentage of the solvent accessible volume (only 13.7%). Such a high CO2 storage capacity was further verified by multiple samples made from repeated syntheses and three independent adsorption measurements. In comparison, the volumetric CO2 storage capacity for ZIF-69 is about 83L/L under the same condition.[13]

To gain insight into the high CO2 adsorption capacity, thermogravimetric data of MC-BIF-2H are analyzed, which gives the first weight loss (4.66%) in the range 120 ~ 220 °C and no further weight loss up to 300 °C (Figure S11), in good agreement with the removal of both extraframework and terminal water molecules (4.75%). We further examined the water loss and the associated structural change by temperature-dependent single crystal X-ray diffraction. The refinement results show that after heating at 220 °C for 2 hours, the single crystal remains stable and that both extraframework and terminal water molecules can be removed (see ESI), leading to open metal sites on Zn1 (Figure S13).

The open Zn2+ site in MC-BIF-2 is different from other M2+ sites in the MC-BIF series, because it is bonded to B(im)4 complexes while in other structures each M2+ site is bonded to at least one carboxylate end. Compared to ZIFs, this open zinc site is also special because the negative charge of four adjacent imidazolate ligands is drawn more toward B3+ in MC-BIF-2. It is thus expected that the open Zn2+ site in MC-BIF-2 receives less negative charge from adjacent ligands and has a correspondingly higher level of the local positive charge, likely making it more polarizing. The net result is likely an increased interaction with CO2, leading to an enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity.[14] Additionally, because of the small kinetic diameter of CO2, the large pore window or large cage cavity is not essential for efficient adsorption. In MC-BIF-2H, the pore space formed by 3D metal-boron-imidazolate framework is further partitioned by dicarboxylates into smaller pore regions, which may also help enhance the CO2 storage. This is consistent with the previous observations that interpenetration and extra-framework species can enhance gas sorption properties, even though the pore space may be reduced.[15]

The H2 adsorption isotherms of MC-BIF-2H, MC-BIF-3H, and MC-BIF-5H at 77 K and 1 atm give an uptake of 9.9, 28.2 and 3.7 cm3g−1, respectively. Likely due to the small pore aperture in these MC-BIFs, the H2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of these samples are distinctly hysteretic. Although these compounds showed CO2 and H2 adsorption, no significant N2 adsorption was observed, which is likely due to the limitation of the aperture size.

In summary, we have created a new family of porous materials (MC-BIFs) by integrating metal carboxylates and boron imidazolates. The rich synthetic and structural chemistry of the MC-BIF system has been demonstrated through both hydro- or solvothermal synthesis with different metal ions (Zn2+ or Cd2+) and different carboxylates (bdc and btc), in conjunction with [B(im)4] complexes and “free” imidazolate ligand. The dimensionality of M/carboxylate and M/[B(im)4] substructures can also be tuned to create new framework materials with tunable gas sorption properties. Among these new materials, the hydrothermally synthesized MC-BIF-2H exhibits a very high volumetric CO2 storage capacity at 81L/L, comparable to 83L/L previously reported for a highly porous ZIF-69.

Supplementary Material

Supp Data

Acknowledgments

We thank the support of this work by NSF (X. B. DMR-0846958), DOE (P. F. DE-SC0002235), and NIH-RISE (R. N. GM071638). X. B is a Henry Dreyfus Teacher Scholar.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.angewandte.org or from the author.

Contributor Information

Dr. Shoutian Zheng, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840

Tao Wu, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.

Dr. Jian Zhang, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840

Mina Chow, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840.

Ruben A. Nieto, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840

Prof. Dr Pingyun Feng, Email: pingyun.feng@ucr.edu, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521.

Prof. Dr Xianhui Bu, Email: xbu@csulb.edu, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, Fax: (+) 562-985-8557.

References

  • 1.Long J, Yaghi OM, editors. Chem Soc Rev. Vol. 38. 2009. Topical issue on metal-organic frameworks; pp. 1213–1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Férey G. Chem, Soc, Rev. 2008;37:191. doi: 10.1039/b618320b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.a) Chui SSY, Lo SMF, Charmant JPH, Orpen AG, Williams LD. Science. 1999;283:1148. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5405.1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Li H, Eddaoudi M, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. Nature. 1999;402:276. [Google Scholar]; c) Férey G, Mellot-Draznieks C, Serre C, Millange F, Dutour J, Surblé S, Margiolaki I. Science. 2005;309:2040. doi: 10.1126/science.1116275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Yang S, Lin X, Blake AJ, Walker G, Hubberstey P, Champness NR, Schröder M. Nat Chem. 2009;1:487. doi: 10.1038/nchem.333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Zhao X, Xiao B, Fletcher AJ, Thomas KM, Bradshaw D, Rosseinsky MJ. Science. 2004;306:1012. doi: 10.1126/science.1101982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.a) Xiao B, Byrne PJ, Wheatley PS, Wragg DS, Zhao X, Fletcher AJ, Thomas KM, Peters L, Evans JSO, Warren JE, Zhou W, Morris RE. Nature Chem. 2009;1:289. doi: 10.1038/nchem.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ma L, Jin A, Xie Z, Lin W. Angew Chem. 2009;121:10089. [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:9905. [Google Scholar]; c) Koh K, Wong-Foy AG, Matzger AJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:4184. doi: 10.1021/ja809985t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Tsuruoka T, Furukawa S, Takashima Y, Yoshida K, Isoda S, Kitagawa S. Angew Chem. 2009;121:4833. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:4739. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.a) Chen B, Wang L, Xiao Y, Fronczek FR, Xue M, Cui Y, Qian G. Angew Chem. 2009;121:508. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:500. [Google Scholar]; b) Zhao D, Yuan D, Sun D, Zhou HC. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:9186. doi: 10.1021/ja901109t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Zhang J, Wojtas L, Larsen RW, Eddaoudi M, Zaworotko MJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:17040. doi: 10.1021/ja906911q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Park HJ, Suh MP. Chem Commun. 2010;46:610. doi: 10.1039/b913067e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.a) Demessence A, D’Alessandro DM, Foo ML, Long JR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:8784. doi: 10.1021/ja903411w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sumida K, Hill MR, Horike S, Dailly A, Long JR. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:15120. doi: 10.1021/ja9072707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zhang YB, Zhang WX, Feng FY, Zhang JP, Chen XM. Angew Chem. 2009;121:5391. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:5287. [Google Scholar]; d) Sonnauer A, Hoffmann F, Fröba M, Kienle L, Duppel V, Thommes M, Serre C, Férey G, Stock N. Angew Chem. 2009;121:3768. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:3791. [Google Scholar]; e) Ahnfeldt T, Guillou N, Gunzelmann D, Margiolaki I, Loiseau T, Férey G, Senker J, Stock N. Angew Chem. 2009;121:5265. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:5163. [Google Scholar]; f) Mulfort KL, Farha OK, Malliakas CD, Kanatzidis MG, Hupp JT. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:276. doi: 10.1002/chem.200902104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.a) Alkordi MH, Brant JA, Wojtas L, Kravtsov VC, Cairns AJ, Eddaoud M. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:17753. doi: 10.1021/ja905557z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b); c) Li K, Olson DH, Seidel J, Emge TJ, Gong H, Zeng H, Li J. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:10368. doi: 10.1021/ja9039983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Wu HB, Wang QM. Angew Chem. 2009;121:7479. [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:7343. [Google Scholar]; e) Qiu Y, Deng H, Mou J, Yang S, Zeller M, Batten SR, Wue H, Lie J. Chem Commun. 2009:5415. doi: 10.1039/b907783a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) An J, Geib SJ, Rosi NL. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:38. doi: 10.1021/ja909169x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Tian YQ, Yao SY, Gu D, Cui KH, Guo DW, Zhang G, Chen ZX, Zhao DY. Chem Eur J. 2010;16:1137. doi: 10.1002/chem.200902729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.a) Lu Z, Knobler CB, Furukawa H, Wang B, Liu G, Yaghi OM. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:12532. doi: 10.1021/ja905101s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Phan A, Doonan CJ, Uriberomo FJ, Knobler CB, O’Keefee M, Yaghi OM. Acc Chem Res. 2010;10:58. doi: 10.1021/ar900116g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.a) Zhang J, Wu T, Zhou C, Chen S, Feng P, Bu X. Angew Chem. 2009;121:2580. doi: 10.1002/anie.200804169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:2542. [Google Scholar]; b) Wu T, Zhang J, Zhou C, Wang L, Bu X, Feng P. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:6111. doi: 10.1021/ja901725v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen S, Zhang J, Wu T, Feng P, Bu X. Dalton Trans. 2010;39:697. doi: 10.1039/b920318b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huang SH, Lin CH, Wu WC, Wang SL. Angew Chem. 2009;121:6240. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:6124. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spek AL. Platon. Utrecht University; The Netherlands: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Banerjee R, Phan A, Wang B, Knobler C, Furukawa H, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. Science. 2008;319:939. doi: 10.1126/science.1152516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.a) Dincă M, Long JR. Angew Chem. 2008;120:6870. doi: 10.1002/anie.200801163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2008;47:6766. [Google Scholar]; b) Wu H, Zhou W, Yildirim T. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:4995. doi: 10.1021/ja900258t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.a) Ma L, Lin W. Angew Chem. 2009;121:3691. [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:3637. [Google Scholar]; b) Chen S, Zhang J, Wu T, Feng P, Bu X. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:16027. doi: 10.1021/ja906302t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Data

RESOURCES