Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Mar 15;67(Pt 4):m442–m443. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811008877

Aqua­bromidobis(dimethyl­glyoximato)cobalt(III)

Parthasarathy Meera a, Madhavan Amutha Selvi a, Pachaimuthu Jothi a, Arunachalam Dayalan a,*
PMCID: PMC3099747  PMID: 21753964

Abstract

In the title complex, [CoBr(C4H7N2O2)2(H2O)], a crystallo­graphic mirror plane bis­ects the mol­ecule, perpendicular to the glyoximate ligands. The geometry around the cobalt(III) atom is approximately octa­hedral with the four glyoximate N atoms forming the square base. A bromide ion and the O atom of a water mol­ecule occupy the remaining coordination sites. The N—Co—N bite angles are 82.18 (4) and 80.03 (16)°. The glyoximate moieties form strong intra­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. The coordinated water mol­ecule forms an inter­molecular O—H⋯O hydrogen bond with a glyoximate O atom, thereby generating supra­molecular chains parallel to [010].

Related literature

For related complexes, see: Ohkubo & Fukuzumi (2005); Randall & Alberty (1970); Schrauzer (1968); Trommel et al. (2001). For similar structures, see: Bernstein et al. (1995); Mégnamisi-Bélombé et al. (1983); Meera et al. (2009); Ramesh et al. (2008). For the preparation of similar complexes, see: Vijayraghavan & Dayalan (1992). For spectroscopic studies related to the title complex, see: Folgando et al. (1986); Khan et al. (1997); Lopez et al. (1986).graphic file with name e-67-0m442-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [CoBr(C4H7N2O2)2(H2O)]

  • M r = 387.09

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 7.5903 (3) Å

  • b = 8.8816 (4) Å

  • c = 10.5343 (5) Å

  • β = 96.137 (3)°

  • V = 706.09 (5) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 4.07 mm−1

  • T = 293 K

  • 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker 1999) T min = 0.581, T max = 0.687

  • 7395 measured reflections

  • 1480 independent reflections

  • 1298 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.028

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.034

  • wR(F 2) = 0.096

  • S = 1.22

  • 1480 reflections

  • 101 parameters

  • 2 restraints

  • H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement

  • Δρmax = 1.01 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.54 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004); cell refinement: APEX2 and SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2004); data reduction: SAINT-Plus and XPREP (Bruker, 2004); program(s) used to solve structure: SIR92 (Altomare et al., 1993); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811008877/fj2399sup1.cif

e-67-0m442-sup1.cif (15.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811008877/fj2399Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m442-Isup2.hkl (73KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O2—H2⋯O1i 0.92 (1) 1.58 (1) 2.494 (3) 169 (4)
O3—H3⋯O1ii 0.85 (3) 1.79 (3) 2.616 (3) 167 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Rev. Fr B. Jeyaraj, SJ, Principal, Loyola College (Autonomous), Chennai, India, for providing the necessary facilities, the Head, SAIF, CDRI, Lucknow, India, for supplying the elemental data and the SAIF, IIT Madras, Chennai, India, for recording the 1HNMR spectra and for the X-ray data collection.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

A number of cobalt complexes have been proposed as model systems for vitamin-B12(Trommel et al., 2001; Ohkubo & Fukuzumi, 2005). The most commonly mentioned model system is bis(dimethylglyoximato)cobalt(III) complexes on which Schrauzer has carried out a great amount of research.The common feature of the different models is that each possesses a strong equatorial ligand field (Schrauzer,1968). A variety of cobalt(III) complexes have been discovered possessing stable axial cobalt-carbon bonds. Simple alkyl cobaloximes, are thermally stable upto about 200°C and are therefore among the most stable organo metallic compounds known. Halide ions can coordinate to cobalt(III) as other common anionic ligands. Cobalt(III) complexes, being low spin, are conveniently studied in aqueous medium (Randall & Alberty, 1970). We report here the synthesis and X-ray crystal structure of the title compound.

The geometry around the cobalt(III) is approximately octahedral with the four glyoximate N atoms forming the square base;whereas, the coordinated bromide (Br1) and oxygen (O3) and the coordinated oxygen of water form the apex. The bite angles of the glyoximates with cobalt are N(1)#1-Co(1)—N(1) 82.18 (14)° and N(2)#1-Co(1)—N(2) 80.03 (03)°, respectively. Further N(1)#1-Co(1)—N(2)#1 178.29 (10)° confirms the distorted octahedral geometry of the molecule. The bond lengths Co(1)—N(1)#1, 1.883 (2) Å,Co(1)—N(2)#1, 1.911 (2) Å agree well with the previously reported structures (Meera et al., 2009, Ramesh et al., 2008) and the axial Co–Br distance d(Co1–Br1) = 2.3563 (6)Å agrees well with the reported structure of trans-aquabromobis[ethanedial dioximato(1-)-N,N']cobalt(III)(Mégnamisi-Bélombé et al., 1983). The glyoximate moieties are further bound by strong intraomecular O—H···O hydrogen bonds showing an S(6) ring motif (Bernstein et al., 1995). Thecoordinated water forms an intermolecular hydrogen bond O3—H3···O1ii[symmetry code (ii): -x + 1, y - 1/2, -z + 1] with the glyoximate oxygen atoms which links the inversion related title compound thus forming a ring motif of R22(10). Fused rings of R22(10) generates a supramolecular one dimensional chain extending parallel to [010] direction. The structure is further stabilized through van der waals interaction.

Experimental

Cobalt(II) bromide hexahydrate was thoroughly grinded and exposed to microwave for 30 s.The dehydrated cobalt(II) bromide was mixed with dimethylglyoxime in 1:2 molar ratio in acetone medium and allowed to stir for an hour (Vijayraghavan & Dayalan, 1992). The dibromo complex obtained was filtered dried and then it was refluxed with water for two hours. The resulting brown mass was filtered washed with ether and dried over desiccator. The elemental analysis data, obtained by analytical methods agree well with the theoretical data expected for the formula of the complex, C8H16N4O5BrCo proposed viz.,[Co(dmgH)2(H2O)Br]: Anal,% (cald,%): C, 25.12(24.8); H,4.82(4.13); N,14.50(14.47). The C=N stretching vibration of oxime in its complex was observed at 1580 cm-1 and the intra molecular hydrogen bonded OH around 3100 cm-1. A moderate peak around 1070 cm-1 may be assigned to the C=N—O stretching of the oxime. The peak around 510 cm-1 could be attributed to cobalt(III)-nitrogen stretching (Khan et al., 1997; Folgando et al., 1986). The 1H NMR spectra of the complex in DMSO-d6 shows a sharp intense singlet at 2.3 p.p.m. corresponding to methyl protons of the oxime.The oxime –OH resonates at 13.08 p.p.m..A singlet around 8.5 ppm represents the –OH of the aquo ligand (Lopez et al., 1986).

Refinement

The H– atoms bound to C– atoms were constrained to riding atoms with d(C—H) = 0.96Å and Uiso(H) = 1.5Uequ(C).The positions of the hydrogen atoms,bound to the glyoximate and water O atoms, were identified from difference in the electron density map and restrained to a distance of d(O2—H2) = 0.92 (1)Å and d(O3—H3) = 0.85 (1) Å. A difference elctron density peak of 1.008 e A-3 was observed after the final refinement. Since the observed peak position is meaningless it is ignored.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Displacement ellipsoid plot of the title compound drawn at 30% probability level.The equivalent symbol i represents the mirror symmetry (x, 1/2; -y,z) at one fourth of b axes.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Part of the crystal structure of the title compound showing the formation of one dimensional chain through O3—H3···O1ii hydrogen bond extending along [010] direction [Symmetry codes: (i) x, -y + 1/2, z; (ii) -x + 1, y - 1/2, -z + 1].

Crystal data

[CoBr(C4H7N2O2)2(H2O)] F(000) = 388
Mr = 387.09 Dx = 1.821 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/m Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2yb Cell parameters from 3745 reflections
a = 7.5903 (3) Å θ = 2.7–30.7°
b = 8.8816 (4) Å µ = 4.07 mm1
c = 10.5343 (5) Å T = 293 K
β = 96.137 (3)° Block, brown
V = 706.09 (5) Å3 0.15 × 0.10 × 0.10 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Bruker Kappa APEXII CCD diffractometer 1480 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1298 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.028
ω and φ scans θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.7°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker 1999) h = −9→9
Tmin = 0.581, Tmax = 0.687 k = −10→9
7395 measured reflections l = −12→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.034 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.096 H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
S = 1.22 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0564P)2 + 0.1583P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1480 reflections (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
101 parameters Δρmax = 1.01 e Å3
2 restraints Δρmin = −0.54 e Å3

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.7937 (4) 0.3331 (3) 0.5395 (3) 0.0330 (6)
C2 0.8935 (4) 0.4238 (4) 0.6415 (3) 0.0487 (8)
H2A 0.8818 0.5288 0.6207 0.073*
H2B 1.0164 0.3960 0.6486 0.073*
H2C 0.8469 0.4052 0.7213 0.073*
C3 0.3600 (4) 0.1669 (4) 0.1163 (3) 0.0448 (8)
C4 0.2476 (6) 0.0761 (5) 0.0221 (4) 0.0726 (13)
H4A 0.2737 −0.0288 0.0358 0.109*
H4B 0.2709 0.1038 −0.0626 0.109*
H4C 0.1250 0.0942 0.0318 0.109*
N1 0.6996 (3) 0.3893 (2) 0.4417 (2) 0.0302 (5)
N2 0.4668 (3) 0.1117 (3) 0.2069 (2) 0.0374 (6)
O1 0.6810 (3) 0.5377 (2) 0.4230 (2) 0.0395 (5)
O2 0.4819 (3) −0.0402 (3) 0.2186 (2) 0.0501 (6)
O3 0.3771 (4) 0.2500 0.4145 (3) 0.0314 (6)
Co1 0.58731 (6) 0.2500 0.32505 (5) 0.02601 (18)
Br1 0.83644 (6) 0.2500 0.20942 (4) 0.04048 (18)
H2 0.557 (4) −0.051 (4) 0.293 (2) 0.059 (12)*
H3 0.366 (5) 0.173 (3) 0.460 (3) 0.050 (10)*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.0234 (13) 0.0376 (16) 0.0391 (15) −0.0028 (12) 0.0091 (11) −0.0058 (12)
C2 0.0354 (17) 0.060 (2) 0.0503 (18) −0.0080 (15) 0.0039 (14) −0.0164 (17)
C3 0.0321 (15) 0.068 (2) 0.0356 (16) −0.0038 (15) 0.0097 (13) −0.0091 (15)
C4 0.054 (2) 0.106 (4) 0.056 (2) −0.018 (2) 0.0022 (19) −0.030 (2)
N1 0.0284 (12) 0.0230 (12) 0.0415 (13) −0.0032 (9) 0.0139 (10) −0.0029 (10)
N2 0.0327 (13) 0.0388 (15) 0.0430 (14) −0.0053 (11) 0.0140 (11) −0.0082 (11)
O1 0.0446 (12) 0.0229 (10) 0.0538 (13) −0.0022 (9) 0.0180 (10) −0.0031 (9)
O2 0.0540 (15) 0.0376 (13) 0.0604 (15) −0.0075 (11) 0.0142 (12) −0.0163 (11)
O3 0.0300 (14) 0.0259 (15) 0.0401 (16) 0.000 0.0130 (12) 0.000
Co1 0.0251 (3) 0.0227 (3) 0.0312 (3) 0.000 0.0076 (2) 0.000
Br1 0.0364 (3) 0.0432 (3) 0.0441 (3) 0.000 0.01498 (19) 0.000

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

C1—N1 1.289 (4) C4—H4C 0.9600
C1—C1i 1.476 (6) N1—O1 1.338 (3)
C1—C2 1.485 (4) N1—Co1 1.883 (2)
C2—H2A 0.9600 N2—O2 1.358 (3)
C2—H2B 0.9600 N2—Co1 1.911 (2)
C2—H2C 0.9600 O2—H2 0.921 (10)
C3—N2 1.283 (4) O3—Co1 1.938 (3)
C3—C3i 1.475 (7) O3—H3 0.85 (3)
C3—C4 1.477 (4) Co1—N1i 1.883 (2)
C4—H4A 0.9600 Co1—N2i 1.911 (2)
C4—H4B 0.9600 Co1—Br1 2.3563 (6)
N1—C1—C1i 112.79 (16) C3—N2—O2 119.2 (3)
N1—C1—C2 124.4 (3) C3—N2—Co1 117.3 (2)
C1i—C1—C2 122.85 (19) O2—N2—Co1 123.3 (2)
C1—C2—H2A 109.5 N2—O2—H2 103 (2)
C1—C2—H2B 109.5 Co1—O3—H3 114 (3)
H2A—C2—H2B 109.5 N1—Co1—N1i 82.18 (14)
C1—C2—H2C 109.5 N1—Co1—N2i 98.88 (11)
H2A—C2—H2C 109.5 N1i—Co1—N2i 178.29 (10)
H2B—C2—H2C 109.5 N1—Co1—N2 178.29 (10)
N2—C3—C3i 112.51 (19) N1i—Co1—N2 98.88 (11)
N2—C3—C4 124.4 (4) N2i—Co1—N2 80.03 (16)
C3i—C3—C4 123.1 (2) N1—Co1—O3 91.24 (9)
C3—C4—H4A 109.5 N1i—Co1—O3 91.24 (9)
C3—C4—H4B 109.5 N2i—Co1—O3 87.40 (10)
H4A—C4—H4B 109.5 N2—Co1—O3 87.40 (10)
C3—C4—H4C 109.5 N1—Co1—Br1 90.29 (7)
H4A—C4—H4C 109.5 N1i—Co1—Br1 90.29 (7)
H4B—C4—H4C 109.5 N2i—Co1—Br1 91.04 (7)
C1—N1—O1 122.7 (2) N2—Co1—Br1 91.04 (7)
C1—N1—Co1 116.1 (2) O3—Co1—Br1 177.97 (9)
O1—N1—Co1 121.18 (18)
C1i—C1—N1—O1 179.81 (18) C1—N1—Co1—O3 91.1 (2)
C2—C1—N1—O1 −0.7 (4) O1—N1—Co1—O3 −88.7 (2)
C1i—C1—N1—Co1 0.02 (19) C1—N1—Co1—Br1 −90.28 (19)
C2—C1—N1—Co1 179.5 (2) O1—N1—Co1—Br1 89.92 (19)
C3i—C3—N2—O2 −179.62 (19) C3—N2—Co1—N1i 174.1 (2)
C4—C3—N2—O2 0.8 (5) O2—N2—Co1—N1i −2.4 (2)
C3i—C3—N2—Co1 3.8 (2) C3—N2—Co1—N2i −4.6 (3)
C4—C3—N2—Co1 −175.8 (3) O2—N2—Co1—N2i 178.98 (17)
C1—N1—Co1—N1i 0.0 (2) C3—N2—Co1—O3 83.2 (2)
O1—N1—Co1—N1i −179.82 (14) O2—N2—Co1—O3 −93.2 (2)
C1—N1—Co1—N2i 178.6 (2) C3—N2—Co1—Br1 −95.5 (2)
O1—N1—Co1—N2i −1.2 (2) O2—N2—Co1—Br1 88.1 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
O2—H2···O1i 0.92 (1) 1.58 (1) 2.494 (3) 169 (4)
O3—H3···O1ii 0.85 (3) 1.79 (3) 2.616 (3) 167 (4)

Symmetry codes: (i) x, −y+1/2, z; (ii) −x+1, y−1/2, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: FJ2399).

References

  1. Altomare, A., Cascarano, G., Giacovazzo, C. & Guagliardi, A. (1993). J. Appl. Cryst 26, 343–350.
  2. Bernstein, J., Davis, R. E., Shimoni, L. & Chang, N.-L. (1995). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34, 1555–1573.
  3. Bruker (1999). SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Bruker (2004). APEX2 and SAINT-Plus Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  5. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  6. Folgando, J. V., Coronado, E. & Bltran, D. (1986). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1, pp. 1061–1064.
  7. Khan, T. A., Shahjahan, & Zaidi, S. A. A. (1997). Indian J. Chem. Sect. A, 36, 153–156.
  8. Lopez, C., Alvarez, S., Solans, X. & Font-Altaba, M. (1986). Inorg. Chem. 25, 2962–2969.
  9. Macrae, C. F., Bruno, I. J., Chisholm, J. A., Edgington, P. R., McCabe, P., Pidcock, E., Rodriguez-Monge, L., Taylor, R., van de Streek, J. & Wood, P. A. (2008). J. Appl. Cryst. 41, 466–470.
  10. Meera, P., Revathi, C. & Dayalan, A. (2009). Acta Cryst. E65, m140–m141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  11. Mégnamisi-Bélombé, M., Endres, H. & Rossato, E. (1983). Acta Cryst. C39, 705–707.
  12. Ohkubo, K. & Fukuzumi, S. (2005). J. Phys. Chem. 109, 1105–1113. [DOI] [PubMed]
  13. Ramesh, P., SubbiahPandi, A., Jothi, P., Revathi, C. & Dayalan, A. (2008). Acta Cryst. E64, m300–m301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  14. Randall, W. C. & Alberty, R. A. (1970). Biochemistry, 9, 1886–1892.
  15. Schrauzer, G. N. (1968). Acc. Chem. Res. 1, 97–103.
  16. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Spek, A. L. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 148–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  18. Trommel, J. S., Warncke, K. & Marzilli, L. G. (2001). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 3358–3366. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Vijayraghavan, V. R. & Dayalan, A. (1992). J. Indian Chem. Soc. 69, 383–384.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811008877/fj2399sup1.cif

e-67-0m442-sup1.cif (15.2KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811008877/fj2399Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m442-Isup2.hkl (73KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES