Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Mar 19;67(Pt 4):o922. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811009810

2-(Thio­phen-2-yl)-N-(4-{(E)-[2-(thio­phen-2-yl)eth­yl]imino­meth­yl}benzyl­idene)ethanamine

Haleden Chiririwa a,*, Reinout Meijboom b, Bernard Omondi b
PMCID: PMC3099871  PMID: 21754193

Abstract

In the crystal of the centrosymmetric title compound, C20H20N2S2, mol­ecules are linked by head-to-tail C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, resulting in chains extending along the a axis. Three additional C—H⋯π inter­molecular inter­actions give rise to a herringbone packing motif which extends along the c axis. The C—H⋯N inter­actions provide links between the sheets.

Related literature

For related literature on bidendate Schiff base ligands, see: Chakraborty et al. (1999); Haga & Koizumi (1985).graphic file with name e-67-0o922-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • C20H20N2S2

  • M r = 352.52

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 9.8592 (10) Å

  • b = 7.1533 (6) Å

  • c = 25.678 (2) Å

  • β = 96.646 (5)°

  • V = 1798.8 (3) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 0.30 mm−1

  • T = 173 K

  • 0.22 × 0.2 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

  • Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007) T min = 0.925, T max = 0.988

  • 16248 measured reflections

  • 2230 independent reflections

  • 1679 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.045

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.057

  • wR(F 2) = 0.181

  • S = 1.08

  • 2230 reflections

  • 109 parameters

  • 14 restraints

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.80 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.42 e Å−3

Data collection: COLLECT (Nonius, 1998); cell refinement: DENZO-SMN (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997); data reduction: DENZO-SMN; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2005) and ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997); software used to prepare material for publication: WinGX (Farrugia, 1999).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811009810/go2007sup1.cif

e-67-0o922-sup1.cif (15.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811009810/go2007Isup2.hkl

e-67-0o922-Isup2.hkl (107.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °).

Cg1 andCg2 are the centroids of the thio­phene and benzene rings, respectively.

D—H⋯A D—H H⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C4—H4⋯N8i 0.95 2.61 3.514 (3) 159
C2—H2⋯Cg1ii 0.95 2.79 3.702 (3) 161
C6—H6ACg2iii 0.99 2.72 3.515 (3) 137
C6—H6ACg2iv 0.99 2.72 3.515 (3) 137

Symmetry codes: (i) Inline graphic; (ii) Inline graphic; (iii) Inline graphic; (iv) Inline graphic.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Mintek and Project AuTEK for funding this project.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

The title compound belongs to a class of tetradentate ligands. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a neutral thiophenyldimine-based bridging ligand. This compound is a potential tetra-coordinate ligand but on complexation the compound will probably behave as a bidentate ligand as the sulfur, on the thiophene, has weak donor capacity towards co-ordination for majority of metal ions. Besides its use as a ligand, it is interesting from the crystal engineering point of view for the analysis of the packing mode of (I).

Compound (I) crystallizes with half a molecule in the asymmetric unit, with the other half generated through symmetry located in the center of the phenyl ring (Fig. 1). The phenyl ring together with the atoms C7—N8—C9 and the thiophene ring together with the atom C6 are planar with N8 and C5 deviating the most from the planes by 0.018 (2) Å and 0.010 (2) Å respectively. The two planes are close to parallel, the angle between them being 9.3 (1)°. Bond distances and angles in (I) are as expected from the chemical bonding.

The crystal structure of (I) is composed of head-to-tail C—H···N hydrogen bonded chains (Table 1) that extend in the crystallographic a axis (Fig. 2). Additionally, the phenyl and thiophen rings are involved in C—H···π intermolecular interactions that result in a herringbone motif that spreads along the crystallographic c axis (Fig. 3). The C—H···N interactions are found to connect these herringbone sheets along the a axis.,

Experimental

A solution of benzene 1,4-dicarboxaldehyde (0.50 g, 3.73 mmol) in methanol (10 ml) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 2-thiophenylethylamine (0.95 g, 7.42 mmol) in methanol (10 ml). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for ca 16 h. The precipitate was filtered off and washed with diethylether and dried under vacuum for 4 h affording a fine shiny white powder in 80% yield. M.p.: 240–242 °C. Recrystallization was done by slow diffusion of Et2O into a concentrated CH2Cl2 solution of the white powder to give colorless crystals fo (I).

Refinement

The methine and aromatic H atoms were placed in geometrically idealized positions and constrained to ride on their parent atoms, with C—H = 0.95 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) for aromatic, C—H = 0.99 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) for CH2 C—H = 0.95 Å and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) for CH.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

View of (I) (50% probability displacement ellipsoids) with H atoms presented as small spheres of arbitrary radii.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

C—H···N hydrogen bond interactions in the crystal structure of (I). [Symmetry operators: (i) = -1/2 + x, 1/2 + y, z]

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Sheets of C—H···π intermolecular interactions between molecules alligned along the bc face.

Crystal data

C20H20N2S2 F(000) = 744
Mr = 352.52 Dx = 1.302 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -C 2yc Cell parameters from 34223 reflections
a = 9.8592 (10) Å θ = 3.2–28.3°
b = 7.1533 (6) Å µ = 0.30 mm1
c = 25.678 (2) Å T = 173 K
β = 96.646 (5)° Plate, colourless
V = 1798.8 (3) Å3 0.22 × 0.2 × 0.04 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer Rint = 0.045
graphite θmax = 28.3°, θmin = 3.2°
1.0° ω scans, 60s h = −13→13
16248 measured reflections k = −9→9
2230 independent reflections l = −34→34
1679 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: full Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.057 Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.181 H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0971P)2 + 3.1807P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
2230 reflections (Δ/σ)max < 0.001
109 parameters Δρmax = 0.80 e Å3
14 restraints Δρmin = −0.42 e Å3

Special details

Experimental. The intensity data was collected on a Nonius Kappa CCD diffractometer using an exposure time of 60 sec/per frame. Analytical data: IR (KBr): 1613?cm-1 (C=N, imine); 1H NMR: (CDCl3) δ H 8.23 (d, 2H) 7.76 (s, 2H) 7.13 (dd, 2H) 6.92 (dd, 2H) 6.84 (dd, 4H) 3.91 (dt, 4H) 3.25 (t, 4H); Anal. calcd. for C20H20N2S2: C, 68.14%; H, 5.72%; N, 7.95%; S, 18.19; Found: C, 68.19%; H, 5.52%; N, 7.72%; S, 18.44; EI—MS: m/z 351.76 [M]+;
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
S1 0.62222 (7) −0.24504 (10) 0.31079 (3) 0.0357 (3)
C2 0.7356 (3) −0.3763 (4) 0.28220 (10) 0.0400 (7)
H2 0.711 −0.4684 0.2562 0.048*
C3 0.8651 (3) −0.3341 (4) 0.30095 (10) 0.0355 (6)
H3 0.9419 −0.3955 0.2896 0.043*
C4 0.8766 (2) −0.1915 (3) 0.33866 (8) 0.0194 (4)
H4 0.9607 −0.1441 0.3552 0.023*
C5 0.7453 (2) −0.1270 (3) 0.34886 (9) 0.0230 (5)
C6 0.7117 (3) 0.0246 (3) 0.38573 (10) 0.0286 (5)
H6A 0.7616 0.0005 0.4208 0.034*
H6B 0.6128 0.0204 0.3891 0.034*
C7 0.7483 (3) 0.2186 (3) 0.36770 (10) 0.0266 (5)
H7A 0.8479 0.2266 0.366 0.032*
H7B 0.701 0.2431 0.3322 0.032*
N8 0.7077 (2) 0.3574 (3) 0.40432 (8) 0.0257 (5)
C9 0.8002 (2) 0.4632 (3) 0.42630 (9) 0.0232 (5)
H9 0.891 0.4474 0.4181 0.028*
C10 0.7729 (2) 0.6096 (3) 0.46404 (9) 0.0220 (5)
C11 0.6408 (2) 0.6450 (3) 0.47609 (9) 0.0235 (5)
H11 0.5661 0.5741 0.4598 0.028*
C12 0.8813 (2) 0.7162 (3) 0.48807 (9) 0.0234 (5)
H12 0.9713 0.6935 0.4798 0.028*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
S1 0.0339 (4) 0.0352 (4) 0.0373 (4) −0.0022 (3) 0.0007 (3) −0.0044 (3)
C2 0.073 (2) 0.0227 (13) 0.0245 (12) −0.0002 (13) 0.0045 (13) −0.0058 (10)
C3 0.0487 (16) 0.0284 (13) 0.0314 (13) 0.0127 (12) 0.0133 (12) −0.0009 (9)
C4 0.0167 (9) 0.0190 (10) 0.0217 (10) 0.0007 (8) −0.0012 (8) 0.0046 (7)
C5 0.0288 (11) 0.0183 (11) 0.0230 (11) 0.0037 (9) 0.0073 (9) 0.0019 (9)
C6 0.0396 (14) 0.0218 (12) 0.0262 (12) 0.0020 (10) 0.0118 (10) −0.0013 (9)
C7 0.0309 (13) 0.0223 (12) 0.0282 (12) −0.0010 (9) 0.0096 (10) −0.0063 (9)
N8 0.0293 (11) 0.0214 (10) 0.0269 (10) 0.0010 (8) 0.0055 (8) −0.0061 (8)
C9 0.0260 (11) 0.0207 (11) 0.0238 (11) 0.0007 (9) 0.0073 (9) −0.0010 (9)
C10 0.0269 (12) 0.0181 (11) 0.0211 (10) −0.0002 (9) 0.0028 (8) −0.0003 (9)
C11 0.0236 (11) 0.0220 (11) 0.0248 (11) −0.0024 (9) 0.0026 (9) −0.0030 (9)
C12 0.0200 (11) 0.0245 (12) 0.0263 (11) 0.0009 (9) 0.0048 (9) −0.0015 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

S1—C2 1.691 (3) C7—N8 1.455 (3)
S1—C5 1.693 (2) C7—H7A 0.99
C2—C3 1.345 (4) C7—H7B 0.99
C2—H2 0.95 N8—C9 1.266 (3)
C3—C4 1.402 (4) C9—C10 1.472 (3)
C3—H3 0.95 C9—H9 0.95
C4—C5 1.427 (3) C10—C11 1.397 (3)
C4—H4 0.95 C10—C12 1.397 (3)
C5—C6 1.501 (3) C11—C12i 1.388 (3)
C6—C7 1.520 (3) C11—H11 0.95
C6—H6A 0.99 C12—C11i 1.388 (3)
C6—H6B 0.99 C12—H12 0.95
C2—S1—C5 93.55 (13) N8—C7—C6 109.48 (19)
C3—C2—S1 111.6 (2) N8—C7—H7A 109.8
C3—C2—H2 124.2 C6—C7—H7A 109.8
S1—C2—H2 124.2 N8—C7—H7B 109.8
C2—C3—C4 114.1 (2) C6—C7—H7B 109.8
C2—C3—H3 122.9 H7A—C7—H7B 108.2
C4—C3—H3 122.9 C9—N8—C7 117.3 (2)
C3—C4—C5 111.0 (2) N8—C9—C10 122.8 (2)
C3—C4—H4 124.5 N8—C9—H9 118.6
C5—C4—H4 124.5 C10—C9—H9 118.6
C4—C5—C6 128.3 (2) C11—C10—C12 119.2 (2)
C4—C5—S1 109.73 (17) C11—C10—C9 121.4 (2)
C6—C5—S1 121.93 (18) C12—C10—C9 119.4 (2)
C5—C6—C7 113.0 (2) C12i—C11—C10 119.9 (2)
C5—C6—H6A 109 C12i—C11—H11 120
C7—C6—H6A 109 C10—C11—H11 120
C5—C6—H6B 109 C11i—C12—C10 120.8 (2)
C7—C6—H6B 109 C11i—C12—H12 119.6
H6A—C6—H6B 107.8 C10—C12—H12 119.6
C5—S1—C2—C3 0.4 (2) C5—C6—C7—N8 177.7 (2)
S1—C2—C3—C4 −0.9 (3) C6—C7—N8—C9 121.8 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C5 1.1 (3) C7—N8—C9—C10 179.9 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6 −179.2 (2) N8—C9—C10—C11 −2.7 (4)
C3—C4—C5—S1 −0.8 (2) N8—C9—C10—C12 177.7 (2)
C2—S1—C5—C4 0.25 (18) C12—C10—C11—C12i −0.5 (4)
C2—S1—C5—C6 178.7 (2) C9—C10—C11—C12i 179.9 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C7 69.3 (3) C11—C10—C12—C11i 0.6 (4)
S1—C5—C6—C7 −108.9 (2) C9—C10—C12—C11i −179.9 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+3/2, −y+3/2, −z+1.

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 andCg2 are the centroids of the thiophene and benzene rings, respectively.
D—H···A D—H H···A D···A D—H···A
C4—H4···N8ii 0.95 2.61 3.514 (3) 159
C2—H2···Cg1iii 0.95 2.79 3.702 (3) 161
C6—H6A···Cg2iv 0.99 2.72 3.515 (3) 137
C6—H6A···Cg2v 0.99 2.72 3.515 (3) 137

Symmetry codes: (ii) x+1/2, y−1/2, z; (iii) −x+3/2, y−1/2, −z+1/2; (iv) x, y−1, z; (v) −x+3/2, −y+1/2, −z+1.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: GO2007).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2005). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2007). APEX2, SADABS and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Chakraborty, S., Munshi, P. & Lahiri, G. K. (1999). Polyhedron, 18, 1437–1444.
  4. Farrugia, L. J. (1997). J. Appl. Cryst. 30, 565.
  5. Farrugia, L. J. (1999). J. Appl. Cryst. 32, 837–838.
  6. Haga, M. & Koizumi, K. (1985). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 104, 47–50.
  7. Nonius (1998). COLLECT Nonius BV, Delft. The Netherlands.
  8. Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. (1997). Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 276, Macromolecular Crystallography, Part A, edited by C. W. Carter Jr & R. M. Sweet, pp. 307–326. New York: Academic Press.
  9. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811009810/go2007sup1.cif

e-67-0o922-sup1.cif (15.5KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811009810/go2007Isup2.hkl

e-67-0o922-Isup2.hkl (107.5KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES