Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Mar 5;67(Pt 4):m398. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811001759

A second polymorph of catena-poly[[(1,10-phenanthroline-κ2 N,N′)copper(II)]-di-μ-thio­cyanato-κ2 N:S2 S:N]

Shi-Shen Zhang a,*, Li-Jiang Chen a, Yi-Feng Han a
PMCID: PMC3099897  PMID: 21753934

Abstract

In the title coordination polymer, [Cu(NCS)2(C12H8N2)]n, the CuII atom is situated on a twofold rotation axis and is coordinated by two N atoms from the bidentate 1,10-phenanthroline ligand and four thio­cyanate groups to confer a CuN4S2 octa­hedral geometry and resulting in a layer structure extending parallel to (100).

Related literature

For the first polymorph of this composition, see: Breneman & Parker (1993). For related structures, see: Kulkarni et al. (2002); Morpurgo et al. (1984).graphic file with name e-67-0m398-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Cu(NCS)2(C12H8N2)]

  • M r = 359.90

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 14.0353 (13) Å

  • b = 10.3081 (9) Å

  • c = 10.2670 (9) Å

  • β = 111.034 (2)°

  • V = 1386.4 (2) Å3

  • Z = 4

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 1.87 mm−1

  • T = 294 K

  • 0.25 × 0.22 × 0.15 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) T min = 0.633, T max = 0.755

  • 3938 measured reflections

  • 1362 independent reflections

  • 1254 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.015

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.027

  • wR(F 2) = 0.076

  • S = 1.08

  • 1362 reflections

  • 97 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.33 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.31 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 1998); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 1998); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL.

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001759/ng5084sup1.cif

e-67-0m398-sup1.cif (13.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001759/ng5084Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m398-Isup2.hkl (67.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Qianjiang Talents Project of the Technology Office of Zhejiang Province (grant No. 2009R10029), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 20803067) and the Zhejiang Provincial Top Academic Discipline of Applied Chemistry and Eco-Dyeing & Finishing Engineering (grant No. ZYG2010019).

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

Phenanthroline and its derivatives have been achieving rapidly increasing attention not only for their potential application as functional materials, but aslo from their intriguing variety of architectures and topologies. 1, 10-Phenanthroline, as one kind of those ligand, has usually been used to construct a great variety of structurally interesting entities, such as monomers(Breneman et al. 1993), ploymers(Kulkarni et al. 2002; Morpurgo et al. 1984).

The structure of the title compound (I) is illustrated in Fig. 1. the CuII atom is coordinated by two N atoms from1, 10-Phenanthroline ligand, as well as by the two N atoms and two S atoms from four thiocyanate groups to confer a distorted octahedral coordination at the metal centre. Two S atoms occupy the axial position, showing weak interaction of Cu1—S1 bond [2.952 (3)], which give rise to one-dimensional chain along (100), the crystal packing is stabilized by the intermolecular π-π stacking interaction(Fig. 2).

In contrast to the first polymorph of this composition in which the distance of Cu—S bonds are longer [3.163 (2) Å], and the S—Cu—S' angles are nearly linear [170.86 (6)°]. The S—Cu—N angles in reported complex vary from 73.8 (1) to 99.1 (1)°, which make the octahedral geometry of this compound more disordered than the title compoud.

Experimental

The mixture of CuSCN (0.0244 g, 0.2 mmol), 1, 10-Phenanthroline (0.0132 g, 0.1 mmol), were placed and sealed in a 10 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel reactor and heated to 160 °C for 72 h, then cooled down to room temperature at a rate of 5 °C/ 60 min. Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained in the form of black bars in ca 35% yield.

The web of checkcif show one Alert level B(Hirshfeld Test Diff S1 – C7..8.52 su), we think this is the result of the sightly distorted S atom of the thiocyanate group for his weak interaction to the Cu atom.

Refinement

H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with C—H = 0.93?Å(aromatic) and Uĩso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C)

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The coordination environment of the title compound

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

The crystal packing of the title compound

Crystal data

[Cu(NCS)2(C12H8N2)] F(000) = 724
Mr = 359.90 Dx = 1.724 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -c 2yc Cell parameters from 1647 reflections
a = 14.0353 (13) Å θ = 2.5–27.8°
b = 10.3081 (9) Å µ = 1.87 mm1
c = 10.2670 (9) Å T = 294 K
β = 111.034 (2)° Block, black
V = 1386.4 (2) Å3 0.25 × 0.22 × 0.15 mm
Z = 4

Data collection

Bruker SMART diffractometer 1362 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1254 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.015
φ and ω scans θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 2.5°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 1996) h = −17→17
Tmin = 0.633, Tmax = 0.755 k = −12→5
3938 measured reflections l = −12→12

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.027 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.076 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0475P)2 + 0.5818P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
1362 reflections Δρmax = 0.33 e Å3
97 parameters Δρmin = −0.31 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.0008 (3)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
Cu1 0.5000 0.62211 (3) 0.2500 0.03359 (15)
N2 0.43016 (13) 0.49319 (16) 0.32227 (17) 0.0407 (4)
N1 0.56960 (11) 0.77181 (16) 0.19112 (15) 0.0330 (3)
C7 0.39033 (14) 0.43783 (18) 0.38718 (19) 0.0324 (4)
C6 0.53802 (14) 0.88917 (17) 0.21873 (19) 0.0326 (4)
C1 0.64028 (15) 0.7684 (2) 0.1322 (2) 0.0426 (5)
H1 0.6632 0.6884 0.1136 0.051*
C4 0.57499 (16) 1.0064 (2) 0.1877 (2) 0.0415 (5)
C3 0.64909 (17) 0.9994 (2) 0.1252 (2) 0.0488 (6)
H3 0.6761 1.0749 0.1027 0.059*
C2 0.68083 (19) 0.8814 (2) 0.0979 (3) 0.0507 (6)
H2 0.7296 0.8759 0.0562 0.061*
S1 0.33300 (4) 0.36018 (5) 0.47588 (6) 0.04095 (18)
C5 0.5358 (2) 1.12518 (19) 0.2202 (3) 0.0548 (6)
H5 0.5599 1.2038 0.1999 0.066*

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
Cu1 0.0418 (2) 0.0268 (2) 0.0433 (2) 0.000 0.02887 (17) 0.000
N2 0.0479 (10) 0.0375 (9) 0.0432 (9) −0.0075 (8) 0.0242 (8) 0.0008 (7)
N1 0.0348 (8) 0.0338 (8) 0.0351 (8) −0.0009 (6) 0.0182 (6) 0.0016 (6)
C7 0.0353 (9) 0.0279 (9) 0.0358 (9) −0.0008 (8) 0.0148 (8) −0.0027 (7)
C6 0.0359 (10) 0.0312 (9) 0.0302 (9) −0.0021 (7) 0.0111 (8) 0.0015 (7)
C1 0.0424 (10) 0.0461 (12) 0.0487 (11) −0.0017 (9) 0.0280 (9) 0.0019 (9)
C4 0.0451 (11) 0.0366 (11) 0.0391 (10) −0.0057 (9) 0.0107 (9) 0.0052 (8)
C3 0.0515 (12) 0.0467 (13) 0.0501 (12) −0.0150 (10) 0.0206 (10) 0.0097 (10)
C2 0.0481 (12) 0.0637 (16) 0.0498 (13) −0.0116 (10) 0.0293 (11) 0.0039 (10)
S1 0.0430 (3) 0.0442 (3) 0.0433 (3) −0.0070 (2) 0.0249 (2) 0.0026 (2)
C5 0.0705 (17) 0.0301 (11) 0.0589 (15) −0.0062 (9) 0.0174 (12) 0.0025 (9)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

Cu1—N2 1.9492 (16) C1—C2 1.397 (3)
Cu1—N2i 1.9492 (16) C1—H1 0.9300
Cu1—N1 2.0310 (15) C4—C3 1.406 (3)
Cu1—N1i 2.0310 (15) C4—C5 1.430 (3)
N2—C7 1.162 (3) C3—C2 1.359 (3)
N1—C1 1.335 (2) C3—H3 0.9300
N1—C6 1.353 (2) C2—H2 0.9300
C7—S1 1.6259 (19) C5—C5i 1.351 (6)
C6—C4 1.397 (3) C5—H5 0.9300
C6—C6i 1.430 (4)
N2—Cu1—N2i 94.04 (10) N1—C1—H1 119.0
N2—Cu1—N1 173.03 (6) C2—C1—H1 119.0
N2i—Cu1—N1 92.49 (7) C6—C4—C3 117.1 (2)
N2—Cu1—N1i 92.49 (7) C6—C4—C5 118.8 (2)
N2i—Cu1—N1i 173.03 (6) C3—C4—C5 124.1 (2)
N1—Cu1—N1i 81.10 (9) C2—C3—C4 119.4 (2)
C7—N2—Cu1 164.69 (16) C2—C3—H3 120.3
C1—N1—C6 118.10 (17) C4—C3—H3 120.3
C1—N1—Cu1 129.05 (15) C3—C2—C1 120.1 (2)
C6—N1—Cu1 112.85 (12) C3—C2—H2 120.0
N2—C7—S1 179.12 (18) C1—C2—H2 120.0
N1—C6—C4 123.34 (18) C5i—C5—C4 121.13 (13)
N1—C6—C6i 116.59 (10) C5i—C5—H5 119.4
C4—C6—C6i 120.07 (12) C4—C5—H5 119.4
N1—C1—C2 121.9 (2)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x+1, y, −z+1/2.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: NG5084).

References

  1. Breneman, G. L. & Parker, O. J. (1993). Polyhedron, 12, 891–895.
  2. Bruker (1998). SMART and SAINT Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Kulkarni, P., Padhye, S., Sinn, E., Anson, C. E. & Powell, A. K. (2002). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 332, 167–175.
  4. Morpurgo, G. O., Dessy, G. & Fares, V. (1984). J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. pp. 785–791.
  5. Sheldrick, G. M. (1996). SADABS University of Göttingen, Germany.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001759/ng5084sup1.cif

e-67-0m398-sup1.cif (13.9KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811001759/ng5084Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m398-Isup2.hkl (67.3KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES