Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online
. 2011 Mar 26;67(Pt 4):m486. doi: 10.1107/S1600536811009895

Di-μ-chlorido-bis[chloridobis(dimethyl sulfoxide-κO)tin(II)]

Ioana Barbul a, Richard A Varga a,*, Cristian Silvestru a
PMCID: PMC3100018  PMID: 21753997

Abstract

The structure of the title compound, [Sn2Cl4(C2H6OS)4], contains dimers formed through weak Sn⋯Cl [3.691 (2) Å] inter­actions, resulting in a planar Sn2Cl2 core with an inversion center at the centre of the four-membered ring. The SnII atoms are penta­coordinated and have a distorted octa­hedral Ψ-SnCl3O2 coordination geometry. The O atoms from the dimethyl sulfoxide mol­ecules occupy trans positions, while the Cl atoms exhibit a meridional arrangement.

Related literature

For related tin chlorides, see: Kisenyi et al. (1985); Kiriyama et al. (1973). For the structure of free DMSO, see: Viswamitra & Kannan (1966). graphic file with name e-67-0m486-scheme1.jpg

Experimental

Crystal data

  • [Sn2Cl4(C2H6OS)4]

  • M r = 691.70

  • Monoclinic, Inline graphic

  • a = 11.1449 (17) Å

  • b = 13.349 (2) Å

  • c = 8.4394 (13) Å

  • β = 103.728 (2)°

  • V = 1219.7 (3) Å3

  • Z = 2

  • Mo Kα radiation

  • μ = 2.84 mm−1

  • T = 297 K

  • 0.28 × 0.25 × 0.23 mm

Data collection

  • Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer

  • Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) T min = 0.469, T max = 0.523

  • 8630 measured reflections

  • 2148 independent reflections

  • 1853 reflections with I > 2σ(I)

  • R int = 0.062

Refinement

  • R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.050

  • wR(F 2) = 0.097

  • S = 1.18

  • 2148 reflections

  • 105 parameters

  • H-atom parameters constrained

  • Δρmax = 0.57 e Å−3

  • Δρmin = −0.72 e Å−3

Data collection: SMART (Bruker, 2000); cell refinement: SAINT-Plus (Bruker, 2001); data reduction: SAINT-Plus; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2006); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010).

Supplementary Material

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811009895/vn2005sup1.cif

e-67-0m486-sup1.cif (14.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811009895/vn2005Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m486-Isup2.hkl (105.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report

Table 1. Selected geometric parameters (Å, °).

Cl1—Sn1 2.4767 (19)
Cl2—Sn1 2.4886 (19)
O1—Sn1 2.382 (5)
O2—Sn1 2.371 (5)
O2—Sn1—O1 166.36 (17)
O2—Sn1—Cl1 86.61 (13)
O1—Sn1—Cl1 85.99 (13)
O2—Sn1—Cl2 84.94 (14)
O1—Sn1—Cl2 84.15 (13)
Cl1—Sn1—Cl2 93.86 (7)

Acknowledgments

We thank the National Centre for X-Ray Diffraction, Cluj-Napoca, for support of the X-ray structure determination.

supplementary crystallographic information

Comment

In an attempt to perform an oxidative addition of SnCl2 to an organic halide, the title compound was isolated as a by-product.

The tin(II) dichloride crystallizes with two dimethylsulfoxide molecules which coordinate to the metal center in a trans fashion through the oxygen atoms [O1—Sn1—O2 = 166.36 (17)°] (Figure 1). The molecular units are connected in dimers through weak Sn···Cl interactions [Sn1···Cl1i = 3.691 (2) Å; symmetry code (i): -x, -y + 2, -z] trans to a Sn1—Cl2 bond [Cl2— Sn1···Cl1i = 164.85 (6)°]. This results in a planar Sn2Cl2 core with an inversion centre in the middle of the four-membered ring (Figure 2). The chlorine bridges are asymmetric and the endocyclic angles around chlorine atoms [Sn1—Cl1—Sn1i = 101.11 (5)°] are larger than the endocyclic angles around tin [Cl1—Sn1—Cl1i = 78.90 (6)°].

In the dimer unit the tin atom is pentacoordinated in a distorted pseudo-octahedral coordination geometry, with the two chlorine atoms from the same molecular unit in cis positions [Cl1—Sn1—Cl2 = 93.86 (7)°] and a bridging chlorine atom trans to the free position. In contrast, in SnCl4.2DMSO (Kisenyi et al., 1985) the tin atom is hexacoordinated, with the oxygen atoms from the dimethylsulfoxide in cis position, while the structure of SnCl2.2H2O is described as pyramidal (Kiriyama et al., 1973) with only one water molecule bonded to the metal center.

The Sn—O bond lengths (Table 1) are similar to those found in SnCl2.2H2O [2.331 (5) Å], but larger than in SnCl4.2DMSO [2.110 (9) and 2.110 (8) Å]. The Sn—Cl bonds follow the same pattern; those in SnCl4.2DMSO [range: 2.369 (3) - 2.406 (3) Å] are larger than in the title compound [Sn1—Cl1 = 2.4767 (19) Å, Sn1—Cl2 = 2.4886 (19) Å] and SnCl2.2H2O [2.500 (2) and 2.562 (2) Å]. This is consistent with the fact that SnCl2 is a weaker Lewis acid than SnCl4.

The S—O bonds [S1—O1 = 1.531 (5) Å, S2—O2 = 1.519 (5) Å] show a decrease of multiplicity from the S═O bond in the free ligand [S═O = 1.471 Å], due to the oxygen-tin interaction. The S—C bond lengths vary between 1.727 (11) and 1.779 (8) Å, which are similar with those from the free DMSO molecule (Viswamitra & Kannan, 1966).

In the strucure the dimers are stacked along the a axis and form layers stacking along the b axis, with alternate arrangement of the dimeric units in consecutive layers (Figure 3).

Experimental

The title compound was isolated as a by-product after the workup of the reaction between SnCl2 to an organic halide performed in hot dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

Refinement

All hydrogen atoms were placed in calculated positions using a riding model, with C—H = 0.96 Å and with Uiso= 1.5Ueq (C) for methyl H.

The data collection was done with 2 second irradiation time per frame over the complete sphere for a total data collection time of 2 hours. An earlier attempt to measure a crystal with a 10 second irradiation time per frame resulted in crystal decay after approximately 3 hours.

Figures

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

: View of the title compound showing the atom-numbering scheme. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level and H atoms as spheres of arbitrary radii.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

: Intermolecular interactions (represented with dashed lines) showing the formation of dimers in crystal structure of the title compound. Symmetry codes as in Table 1.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

: Crystal packing of the title compound. View down the a axis.

Crystal data

[Sn2Cl4(C2H6OS)4] F(000) = 672
Mr = 691.70 Dx = 1.883 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/c Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybc Cell parameters from 3345 reflections
a = 11.1449 (17) Å θ = 2.4–26.6°
b = 13.349 (2) Å µ = 2.84 mm1
c = 8.4394 (13) Å T = 297 K
β = 103.728 (2)° Block, colourless
V = 1219.7 (3) Å3 0.28 × 0.25 × 0.23 mm
Z = 2

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD area-detector diffractometer 2148 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube 1853 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphite Rint = 0.062
φ and ω scans θmax = 25.0°, θmin = 2.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2000) h = −13→13
Tmin = 0.469, Tmax = 0.523 k = −15→15
8630 measured reflections l = −10→10

Refinement

Refinement on F2 Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: full Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.050 H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.097 w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0208P)2 + 2.685P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.18 (Δ/σ)max = 0.001
2148 reflections Δρmax = 0.57 e Å3
105 parameters Δρmin = −0.71 e Å3
0 restraints Extinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods Extinction coefficient: 0.128 (4)

Special details

Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.

Fractional atomic coordinates and isotropic or equivalent isotropic displacement parameters (Å2)

x y z Uiso*/Ueq
C1 0.5033 (7) 0.8276 (6) −0.0501 (11) 0.068 (2)
H1A 0.5258 0.8292 0.0670 0.102*
H1B 0.5703 0.8529 −0.0918 0.102*
H1C 0.4856 0.7598 −0.0864 0.102*
C2 0.3399 (8) 0.8695 (7) −0.3317 (9) 0.069 (2)
H2A 0.3327 0.7980 −0.3425 0.103*
H2B 0.4060 0.8924 −0.3775 0.103*
H2C 0.2639 0.9002 −0.3886 0.103*
C3 0.0141 (10) 1.1657 (9) 0.422 (2) 0.140 (6)
H3A −0.0474 1.1587 0.3220 0.211*
H3B 0.0195 1.2346 0.4557 0.211*
H3C −0.0083 1.1254 0.5051 0.211*
C4 0.2396 (11) 1.1408 (8) 0.5967 (12) 0.101 (4)
H4A 0.1994 1.1045 0.6677 0.152*
H4B 0.2439 1.2105 0.6254 0.152*
H4C 0.3216 1.1150 0.6077 0.152*
Cl1 0.1548 (2) 1.07531 (15) −0.0095 (3) 0.0633 (5)
Cl2 0.40441 (17) 0.95628 (17) 0.2850 (2) 0.0614 (6)
O1 0.2681 (4) 0.8512 (4) −0.0601 (6) 0.0534 (13)
O2 0.1396 (5) 1.0145 (4) 0.3674 (6) 0.0600 (14)
S1 0.37123 (18) 0.90252 (13) −0.1217 (2) 0.0469 (5)
S2 0.1554 (2) 1.12668 (15) 0.3945 (3) 0.0617 (6)
Sn1 0.18486 (4) 0.91864 (3) 0.15234 (6) 0.0448 (3)

Atomic displacement parameters (Å2)

U11 U22 U33 U12 U13 U23
C1 0.054 (5) 0.064 (5) 0.090 (6) 0.006 (4) 0.025 (5) 0.007 (5)
C2 0.079 (6) 0.073 (6) 0.055 (5) −0.015 (5) 0.018 (4) −0.008 (4)
C3 0.074 (8) 0.075 (7) 0.267 (19) 0.011 (6) 0.029 (9) −0.027 (9)
C4 0.139 (10) 0.070 (7) 0.080 (7) 0.004 (6) −0.003 (7) −0.012 (5)
Cl1 0.0684 (13) 0.0577 (12) 0.0648 (12) 0.0102 (10) 0.0178 (10) 0.0151 (10)
Cl2 0.0490 (11) 0.0818 (14) 0.0511 (11) −0.0116 (10) 0.0073 (9) 0.0026 (10)
O1 0.056 (3) 0.053 (3) 0.059 (3) −0.009 (2) 0.028 (3) −0.010 (2)
O2 0.079 (4) 0.045 (3) 0.062 (3) −0.004 (3) 0.030 (3) −0.011 (2)
S1 0.0549 (11) 0.0371 (10) 0.0520 (11) −0.0037 (8) 0.0194 (9) −0.0055 (8)
S2 0.0799 (15) 0.0487 (12) 0.0594 (13) −0.0044 (10) 0.0225 (11) 0.0024 (9)
Sn1 0.0439 (4) 0.0407 (3) 0.0514 (4) −0.0045 (2) 0.0147 (2) 0.0007 (2)

Geometric parameters (Å, °)

C1—S1 1.764 (8) C3—H3C 0.9600
C1—H1A 0.9600 C4—S2 1.751 (10)
C1—H1B 0.9600 C4—H4A 0.9600
C1—H1C 0.9600 C4—H4B 0.9600
C2—S1 1.779 (8) C4—H4C 0.9600
C2—H2A 0.9600 Cl1—Sn1 2.4767 (19)
C2—H2B 0.9600 Cl2—Sn1 2.4886 (19)
C2—H2C 0.9600 O1—S1 1.531 (5)
C3—S2 1.727 (11) O1—Sn1 2.382 (5)
C3—H3A 0.9600 O2—S2 1.519 (5)
C3—H3B 0.9600 O2—Sn1 2.371 (5)
S1—C1—H1A 109.5 S2—C4—H4C 109.5
S1—C1—H1B 109.5 H4A—C4—H4C 109.5
H1A—C1—H1B 109.5 H4B—C4—H4C 109.5
S1—C1—H1C 109.5 S1—O1—Sn1 123.0 (3)
H1A—C1—H1C 109.5 S2—O2—Sn1 127.5 (3)
H1B—C1—H1C 109.5 O1—S1—C1 105.2 (4)
S1—C2—H2A 109.5 O1—S1—C2 104.0 (3)
S1—C2—H2B 109.5 C1—S1—C2 98.7 (4)
H2A—C2—H2B 109.5 O2—S2—C3 103.9 (5)
S1—C2—H2C 109.5 O2—S2—C4 105.6 (4)
H2A—C2—H2C 109.5 C3—S2—C4 97.4 (7)
H2B—C2—H2C 109.5 O2—Sn1—O1 166.36 (17)
S2—C3—H3A 109.5 O2—Sn1—Cl1 86.61 (13)
S2—C3—H3B 109.5 O1—Sn1—Cl1 85.99 (13)
H3A—C3—H3B 109.5 O2—Sn1—Cl2 84.94 (14)
S2—C3—H3C 109.5 O1—Sn1—Cl2 84.15 (13)
H3A—C3—H3C 109.5 Cl1—Sn1—Cl2 93.86 (7)
H3B—C3—H3C 109.5 Sn1—Cl1—Sn1i 101.11 (5)
S2—C4—H4A 109.5 Cl1—Sn1—Cl1i 78.90 (6)
S2—C4—H4B 109.5 Cl2—Sn1—Cl1i 164.85 (6)
H4A—C4—H4B 109.5
Sn1—O1—S1—C1 108.4 (4) S2—O2—Sn1—Cl1 −24.9 (4)
Sn1—O1—S1—C2 −148.3 (4) S2—O2—Sn1—Cl2 69.2 (4)
Sn1—O2—S2—C3 129.3 (7) S1—O1—Sn1—O2 −5.1 (10)
Sn1—O2—S2—C4 −128.7 (5) S1—O1—Sn1—Cl1 52.2 (3)
S2—O2—Sn1—O1 32.3 (10) S1—O1—Sn1—Cl2 −42.1 (3)

Symmetry codes: (i) −x, −y+2, −z.

Footnotes

Supplementary data and figures for this paper are available from the IUCr electronic archives (Reference: VN2005).

References

  1. Brandenburg, K. & Putz, H. (2006). DIAMOND Crystal Impact GbR, Bonn, Germany.
  2. Bruker (2000). SMART and SADABS Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  3. Bruker (2001). SAINT-Plus Bruker AXS Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Kiriyama, H., Kitahama, K., Nakamura, O. & Kiriyama, R. (1973). Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn, 46, 1389–1395.
  5. Kisenyi, J. M., Willey, G. R. & Drew, M. G. B. (1985). Acta Cryst. C41, 700–702.
  6. Sheldrick, G. M. (2008). Acta Cryst. A64, 112–122. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Viswamitra, M. A. & Kannan, K. (1966). Nature (London), 209, 1016–1017.
  8. Westrip, S. P. (2010). J. Appl. Cryst. 43, 920–925.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811009895/vn2005sup1.cif

e-67-0m486-sup1.cif (14.8KB, cif)

Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811009895/vn2005Isup2.hkl

e-67-0m486-Isup2.hkl (105.6KB, hkl)

Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report


Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section E: Structure Reports Online are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES