Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2011 Jun;55(6):2999–3001. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01707-10

Distribution of Antiseptic Resistance Genes qacA, qacB, and smr in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated in Toronto, Canada, from 2005 to 2009

Jean Longtin 1,2,*, Christine Seah 1, Krystal Siebert 1, Allison McGeer 3, Andrew Simor 4, Yves Longtin 2, Donald E Low 1,3, Roberto G Melano 1,3
PMCID: PMC3101426  PMID: 21402848

Abstract

Decreased susceptibility to chlorhexidine gluconate (CHDN) in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with the qacA, qacB, and smr genes, encoding efflux pumps. A total of 334 MRSA isolates were collected from two Canadian intensive care units between 2005 and 2009. We identified the qacAB genes in 7 strains (2%; 2 qacA genes and 5 qacB genes) and the smr gene in 23 (7%) strains. CHDN minimal bactericidal concentrations were slightly higher for strains harboring smr genes.

TEXT

Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHDN) is a hexamethylene biguanide cationic biocide compound with a rapid bactericidal action against a variety of Gram-positive and Gram-negative microorganisms. It is widely used for hand hygiene and surgical antisepsis. It has also been evaluated for modulation of oropharyngeal colonization in critical care units (3, 16). The Canadian Practice Guidelines for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults recommend use of oral chlorhexidine to prevent intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia in selected patient populations (15). Decreased susceptibility to CHDN is mediated primarily through the multidrug efflux pumps encoded by the qacA, qacB, and smr (qacC) genes (12). There are marked geographic differences in the global distribution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) containing CHDN resistance genes. The qacAB genes were detected in 10% to 20% of United Kingdom isolates (9, 10, 19, 20) and in up to 63% in a European study (9). High incidence rates were also identified in Brazil (80%) (10). Asian studies detected qac genes in MRSA at lower rates (32 to 41%) (1, 14, 17). In contrast, smr genes were detected in 31% of MRSA isolates from India but in 0 to 3% of Asian isolates (1, 14, 17). The clinical significance of MRSA carrying the qacA, qacB, and smr genes is still controversial, and methods to determine CHDN susceptibility have not been standardized in microdilution or in agar dilution by organizations such as CLSI or EUCAST. However, a recent study described what seems to be the first clinically significant emergence of CHDN resistance in MRSA, since an antiseptic protocol in an ICU was associated with a replacement of the usual MRSA by a qacA-containing MRSA strain (designated ST239 TW20) with a 3-fold-higher CHDN minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) (2, 6). We carried out a surveillance study of two Canadian ICUs to determine the frequency of these genes in MRSA isolates and to determine the effect of the presence of these genes on in vitro susceptibility.

MRSA strains were provided by Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC), Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We collected the initial strain from each patient colonized or infected with MRSA within their ICU stay during 2005 to 2009 (SHSC) and in 2008 and 2009 (MSH). Isolates were cultured on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood and were incubated under aerobic conditions at 37°C for 24 h. We performed PCR detection of the qacAB and smr genes in all strains using primer sequences published previously (13). qacA, qacB, and smr amplicons were sequenced to confirm identity. We subsequently sequenced the qacA and qacB whole genes in order to subtype the efflux pump, as described elsewhere (1). Detection of mecA was also included as an internal control to confirm the identity of MRSA (8). MICs and MBCs were determined for all strains positive for qacA, qacB, or smr. Control strains, negative for these genes, matched for month and location of primary isolation, were selected in a 1:2 ratio (n = 58) and also underwent determination of MICs and MBCs. We also included three S. aureus positive controls (TS77, TPS162, and L20), respectively, for qacA, qacB, and smr (N. Noguchi, personal communication). MBCs were determined as was described by Batra and collaborators with minor modifications (2, 11). Briefly, MBCs were determined by serial 2-fold dilution of chlorhexidine digluconate solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, Canada) in Mueller-Hinton broth as described previously. Each dilution was inoculated with 5 × 104 CFU of fresh culture in Mueller-Hinton broth set up in a microdilution plate, which was then incubated at 37°C for 24 h. MICs were determined by observing the presence or absence of growth in each dilution. An aliquot of 100 μl of each culture in the microdilution plates was used to determine the MBCs. The Mueller-Hinton agar plates inoculated with these aliquots were incubated for 24 h at 37°C, and colony counts were performed as described previously (11). MBCs were calculated as the concentration that produced ≥99.9% killing of cells. spa typing was performed as an epidemiological method for qacAB- and smr-positive strains and matched controls using primers as described previously (5). The Ridom StaphType software program was used for analysis and assignment of a spa type to each isolate.

A total of 334 strains were obtained from the two Toronto hospitals (93 from MSH and 241 from SHSC). Molecular amplification detected the qacAB genes in 7 strains (2%), whereas the smr gene was detected in 23 (7%) strains. No isolates contained both genes. Sequencing of the qacAB genes revealed that 2/7 strains carried qacA and 5/7 carried qacB. MIC and MBC values were similar for strains harboring qacAB or smr versus strains negative for these genes (Table 1). MBCs of positive controls TS77 (qacA), TPS162 (qacB), and L20 (smr) were 10 μg/ml, 10 μg/ml, and 5 μg/ml, respectively. Of the 27 strains with an MBC of 5 μg/ml, 21 (78%) were negative for the qacA, qacB, and smr genes, whereas of the 14 strains with an MBC of 20 μg/ml, 50% harbored the smr gene. Molecular typing revealed that the spa types t002 and t008 were the most frequent spa types identified in our study. Interestingly, all t064 strains carried the smr gene, but they had very diverse MBCs, ranging from 5 to 20 μg/ml. Twenty-seven isolates (90%) positive for the qacAB or smr gene were linked to these 3 spa types.

Table 1.

spa type, CHDN MBC level, and carriage of qacAB and smr genes in 88 MRSA isolatesa

spa type (nb) No. of isolates with gene carriage and CHDN MBC (μg/ml) ofc:
5
10
20
neg qac smr neg qac smr neg qac smr
t002 (43) 12 2 1 12 3 6 3 0 4
t003 (1) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
t004 (1) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
t007 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
t008 (18) 3 0 1 5 0 4 3 0 2
t018 (1) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t032 (1) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
t037 (4) 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
t045 (6) 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
t059 (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
t062 (1) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
t064 (4) 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1
t1610 (1) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
t2235 (2) 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
t242 (1) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
t437 (1) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
t640 (1) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Total (88) 21 (78) 2 (7) 4 (15) 29 (62) 5 (11) 13 (28) 7 (50) 0 (0) 7 (50)
a

International comparison of spa types commonly associated with Canadian MRSA (CMRSA) strains (4): t002 is CMRSA2, USA100, USA800, and EMRSA-3; t008 is CMRSA9, CMRSA10, and USA300; t037 is CMRSA 3; t064 is CMRSA5 and USA500.

b

n, no. of isolates.

c

neg, negative. A value in parentheses is the percentage of total isolates with the indicated CHDN MBC (for an MBC of 5 μg/ml, n = 27; for an MBC of 10 μg/ml, n = 47; for an MBC of 20 μg/ml, n = 14).

We found that the qacA, qacB, and smr genes are relatively infrequent in MRSA isolated from patients in two Toronto ICUs. spa typing revealed that our clones are consistent with Canadian MRSA epidemiology, so we do not expect a selection bias (4, 18). It is known that the global distribution of the qac and smr genes is highly variable (1, 9, 10, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20). The local utilization of chlorhexidine and other antiseptics could affect the distribution of resistance genes, but a relationship is difficult to infer. Interestingly, we did not witness a clinically significant increase in CHDN MBC to be associated with the presence of the qacA or qacB gene. The QacA pump confers a reduced susceptibility to a broad range of hydrophobic compounds, including CHDN. QacB has a similar action but has a limited impact on CHDN because of an amino acid substitution at position 323, and sequencing is needed to differentiate qacA from qacB (7, 19). Most studies did not make this differentiation, making comparison more difficult (14). The fact that we did not observe a significant increase in MBCs associated with the qac and smr genes is in line with the relatively small increase witnessed by other studies, usually within a 2 2-fold-dilution increase. In a United Kingdom study, isolates with the qacAB genes had significantly higher MBCs for CHDN than negative strains (73 μg/ml versus 18 μg/ml) (19). Sheng et al. identified the qacA and qacB genes more often in MRSA isolates with a CHDN MIC of ≥4 μg/ml than in strains with ≤2 μg/ml (93% versus 5%, respectively) (17). A more recent United Kingdom report found higher MBCs in strains possessing the qacA gene than in those that didn't (78 μg/ml versus 26 μg/ml) (2, 6). In addition, if our clones were to be slightly less active in CHDN efflux, the difference in MBCs would then be difficult to observe. Nonetheless, the clinical impact of such a small MBC increase is debated, since the achieved concentration of topically applied CHDN 0.1% (wt/vol) solution will yield 1,000 μg/ml, manyfold higher than the MBC of any qac- or smr-harboring strain.

In conclusion, we infrequently found the qacA, qacB, and smr genes in MRSA from two intensive care units in Canada. However, the increase in CHDN usage in routine patient care warrants periodic monitoring of susceptibility in order to detect any raise in either gene associated with resistance, as well as phenotypic testing to identify any other mechanisms of resistance.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge N. Noguchi and the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus (NARSA) for supplying strains.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 14 March 2011.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Alam M. M., Kobayashi N., Uehara N., Watanabe N. 2003. Analysis on distribution and genomic diversity of high-level antiseptic resistance genes qacA and qacB in human clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Drug Resist. 9:109–121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Batra R., et al. 2010. Efficacy and limitation of a chlorhexidine-based decolonization strategy in preventing transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit. Clin. Infect. Dis. 50:210–217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. DeRiso A. J., II, Ladowski J. S., Dillon T. A., Justice J. W., Peterson A. C. 1996. Chlorhexidine gluconate 0.12% oral rinse reduces the incidence of total nosocomial respiratory infection and nonprophylactic systemic antibiotic use in patients undergoing heart surgery. Chest 109:1556–1561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Golding G. R., et al. 2008. A preliminary guideline for the assignment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to a Canadian pulsed-field gel electrophoresis epidemic type using spa typing. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 19:273–281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Harmsen D., et al. 2003. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:5442–5448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Holden M. T., et al. 2010. Genome sequence of a recently emerged, highly transmissible, multi-antibiotic- and antiseptic-resistant variant of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, sequence type 239 (TW). J. Bacteriol. 192:888–892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Littlejohn T. G., et al. 1992. Substrate specificity and energetics of antiseptic and disinfectant resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 74:259–265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Louie L., et al. 2002. Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci from blood culture bottles by using a multiplex PCR assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:2786–2790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mayer S., Boos M., Beyer A., Fluit A. C., Schmitz F. J. 2001. Distribution of the antiseptic resistance genes qacA, qacB and qacC in 497 methicillin-resistant and -susceptible European isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 47:896–897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Miyazaki N. H., et al. 2007. The presence of qacA/B gene in Brazilian methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 102:539–540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Moody J., Knapp C. 2010. Minimum bactericidal concentration testing. In Garcia L. S. (ed.), Clinical microbiology Procedures Handbook, 3rd ed., vol. 2 ASM Press, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Noguchi N., et al. 1999. Antiseptic susceptibility and distribution of antiseptic-resistance genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 172:247–253 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Noguchi N., et al. 2006. Antimicrobial agent of susceptibilities and antiseptic resistance gene distribution among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients with impetigo and staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:2119–2125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Noguchi N., et al. 2005. Susceptibilities to antiseptic agents and distribution of antiseptic-resistance genes qacA/B and smr of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated in Asia during 1998 and 1999. J. Med. Microbiol. 54:557–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Rotstein C., et al. 2008. Clinical practice guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 19:19–53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Segers P., Speekenbrink R. G., Ubbink D. T., van Ogtrop M. L., de Mol B. A. 2006. Prevention of nosocomial infection in cardiac surgery by decontamination of the nasopharynx and oropharynx with chlorhexidine gluconate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 296:2460–2466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Sheng W. H., et al. 2009. Epidemiology and susceptibilities of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan: emphasis on chlorhexidine susceptibility. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 63:309–313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Simor A. E., et al. 2010. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization or infection in Canada: national surveillance and changing epidemiology, 1995–2007. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 31:348–356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Smith K., Gemmell C. G., Hunter I. S. 2008. The association between biocide tolerance and the presence or absence of qac genes among hospital-acquired and community-acquired MRSA isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:78–84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Vali L., Davies S. E., Lai L. L., Dave J., Amyes S. G. 2008. Frequency of biocide resistance genes, antibiotic resistance and the effect of chlorhexidine exposure on clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:524–532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES