Skip to main content
PMC home page
Parasites & Vectors logoLink to Parasites & Vectors
. 2011 May 9;4:69. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-69

The prevalence of canine Leishmania infantum infection in western China detected by PCR and serological tests

Jun-Yun Wang 1,✉, Yu Ha 2, Chun-Hua Gao 1, Yong Wang 3, Yue-Tao Yang 1, Hai-Tang Chen 1
PMCID: PMC3101648  PMID: 21554677

Abstract

Background

Canine leishmaniasis (CanL) is endemic in western China, resulting in important public health problem. It is essential to evaluate the prevalence of canine Leishmania infantum infection for designing control policy. In the present study we report for the first time prevalence of Leishmania infection in dogs living in Jiuzhaigou County (Sichuan Provence, China), which is not only an important endemic area of CanL but also a tourism scenic spot, detected by PCR, ELISA and dipstick test. The results could provide key information for designing control programs against canine and human leishmaniasis. In addition, the complete sequence of the Leishmania isolate from Sichuan Province has not been reported to date and we present the sequences of 116 base-pair (bp) fragment of the conserved region in the minicircle kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) and the results of phylogenetic analyses based on the sequence of the amplified fragment.

Results

The proportion of dogs infected with Leishmania in Jiuzhaigou County was 36.79%, 9.43%, and 51.88% detected by ELISA, dipstick test, and PCR, respectively. The ELISA and PCR tests were more sensitive than dipstick test. The PCR method is the most sensitive way to detect dogs infected with Leishmania parasites. The total positive rate for infected dogs in the area was 59.43% by the three methods. The PCR products of 116-bp fragment amplified from the kDNA conserved region of dog blood samples and laboratory maintained L. infantum were DNA sequenced and the variation of the sequences was observed. The phylogenetic tree based on the sequences of 116-bp fragment reveals that L. infantum is more genetically related to visceralizing species L. donovani than to the Leishmania species associated with cutaneous disease.

Conclusions

More than half of dogs living in the endemic Jiuzhaigou County were infected by L. infantum. Control measures, such as treatment or eradication of infected dogs, or prohibition of maintaining dogs, must be taken against these infected dogs due to their role in the transmission of the infection to vectors. The phylogenetic tree based on the sequences of conserved region in kDNA of Leishmania can effectively distinguish species of Leishmania.

Background

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is a severe vector-borne parasitic disease of humans and other mammals caused by protozoa of the Leishmania donovani complex [1,2]. The disease is endemic in 61 countries and is responsible for the annual loss of an estimated 1.81 million disability adjusted life-years (DALYs) and 57,000 lives [3].Clinically and epidemiologically, there are two main forms: zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL) and anthroponotic visceral leishmaniasis (AVL) [4]. ZVL, caused by L. infantum or Leishmania chagasi, is mainly distributed in Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America [5-9]. In most of those regions, canine infection with L. infantum is the cause of disease in dogs and as a reservoir for human VL. Accurate and rapid detection of CanL is of great importance to prevent transmission to humans. Clinical diagnosis of CanL is difficult due to its variable symptomatology [10,11] and that it is usually asymptomatic at the early stage of infection [12]. Identification of the infected dogs in endemic areas has major public health implications. It was demonstrated that not only symptomatic dogs but also asymptomatically infected dogs were the sources of the parasite for vector sandflies and as a consequence play an active role in the transmission of Leishmania to humans [13-17]. Thus, the evaluation of the prevalence of canine Leishmania infection in endemic areas is very important for the epidemiological study and control of leishmaniasis.

VL is still an important public health problem in China and is currently endemic or re-emerging in more than 50 counties in six provinces or autonomous regions in western China including Xinjiang, Gansu, Sichuan, Shaanxi, Shanxi and Inner Mongolia [18-22]. Among them, Gansu, Sichuan, Shaanxi and Shanxi are ZVL endemic areas with dogs as a major reservoir host. In these areas CanL is caused by L. infantum infection and transmitted by wild Phlebotomus chinensis. The elimination of domestic dogs in endemic areas dramatically reduced the human VL cases, confirming the infected dogs are the major source of the human infection [19]. The data from National Diseases Reporting Information System (NDRIS) operated by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) [23] revealed that human VL cases increased continuously in these endemic areas during the past years. Lack of information about CanL prevalence in these endemic areas makes it unclear whether the dog infection is blamed to the re-emerge of the disease in the areas of western China. Therefore, determination of canine Leishmania infection is important to understand the transmission and to the control of leishmaniasis in the endemic areas.

Serological antibody tesst and PCR detection have been extensively used to investigate canine infection with L. infantum [24-28]. Some studies demonstrated that PCR method was more sensitive and specific than parasitological and serological methods [29-31]. Jiuzhagou County of Sichuan Province is not only an important CanL endemic area but also a famous tourism resort. The prevalence of CanL has never been investigated in this area. In this study we investigated the prevalence of Leishmania infection in dogs in this county by using PCR detection compared with serological tests. A 116-bp fragment of minicircle kDNA conserved region of different Leishmania species was amplified from infected dog blood samples with primers K13A-K13B [32,33] and the PCR products were DNA sequenced. The DNA sequences of this fragment isolated from dogs in this county were compared with the reported sequences of L. infantum and other Leishmania species isolated from other regions.

Materials and methods

Study site

The study was carried out in the Jiuzhaigou County, Sichuan Province, an endemic area of CanL. The county (32°53' ~ 33°32' N, 103°27' ~ 104°26'E) is located in mountainous area of Sichuan in southwestern China (Figure 1). It has a annual mean temperature of 7.3°C and varied from 16.8°C in the summer to -3.7°C in the winter, with a mean annual rainfall of 700~800 mm. The capital town of the county and several adjacent townships have an altitude of 1,140~2,000 meters above sea level and are visceral leishmaniasis endemic areas with dogs as major hosts. In recent years, about 20 human VL cases were reported per year, and the incidence rate was about 1/2,000.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The map of China showing the location of the study site. The Jiuzhaigou County is located in the northern part of Sichuan Province in southwestern China.

Animals and sampling

The protocol for sampling had been reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention in hanghai. Oral informed consent was obtained from the owners of dogs. About 2,000 dogs lived in VL endemic area of Jiuzhaigou County. For the sample calculation, the formula applied was n = p (1-p) (1.96/D)2 = 97 dogs, with a 10% error level and a confidence level of 95%, where p = 50%. This is estimated based on investigations carried out in other parts of world [25-31]. Based on the calculation 106 household dogs from different breeds were randomly collected in present study at the capital town of the county and adjacent villages in May of 2010. All tested dogs were older than 7-months (going through at least one sandfly season during May to September) and examined for clinical signs of the disease, including dermatological lesions, ocular changes, weight loss, apathy, lymph node, and spleen enlargement. Five ml of blood samples were taken from the foreleg vein of each dog in EDTA-coated polypropylene tubes for isolating parasite DNA for PCR test, and 2 ml of the blood sample was taken for separating sera for the detection of specific antibodies to Leishmania. Whole blood and sera were stored at -80°C.

Dipstick test

The dipstick test, recombinant k39 antigen-based immunochromatographic strip test to detect anti-Leishmania antibody (the Kalazar Detect, batch JL1019; InBios, Seattle, WA), was carried out in the field according to the manufacturer's instructions.

ELISA

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed as previously described [24] by using cultured L. infantum (MCAN/CN/90/SC) promastigote antigen coating microtiter plates. Sera collected from 23 uninfected dogs with L. infantum in the endemic area were tested for cutoff of IgG-specific ELISA determinations (mean plus 3 standard deviations).The sera from two sick dogs with confirmed L. infantum infection were used as the positive control.

DNA extraction

(i) Cultured parasite

The Leishmania isolate MCAN/CN/90/SC was originally obtained from a dog with leishmaniasis in Sichuan Province and maintained in our laboratory. The parasite was grown in NNN medium at 24°C for 18 days. DNA extraction from cultured parasite was carried out as described by Reale et al [26].

(ii) Dog blood

The DNA was extracted from dog blood samples using E.Z.N.A. SQ Blood DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tech, Inc.) according to manufacturer's instruction. The extracted DNA was washed with 70% ethanol (vol/vol), and suspended in elution buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH8.0).

DNA amplification by PCR

Leishmania genus-specific oligonucleotide primers K13A (5'-dGTGG GGGAGGGGCGTTCT-3') and K13B (5'-dATTTTACACCAACCCCCAGTT-3') described by Rodgers et al. [30] were used to amplify a 116-bp of fragment in the conserved region of Leishmania kDNA minicircles. The primers were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Service Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). PCR amplification was carried out as described previously [34] by using Taq DNA polymerase (Promega) and the extracted DNA samples as templates. A positive control containing 10 ng of genomic L..infantum (MCAN/CN/90/SC) DNA, and a negative control without template DNA were included. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis through 2% agarose gels.

Cloning and sequencing of 116-bp fragment

The PCR products of 116-bp fragment are too short for sequencing directly and thus cloned into pGEM-T vector using a TA cloning kit (Promega) according to manufacturer's instruction. The recombinant plasmid was sequenced with vector flanking primers T7/SP6 by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Service Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

Phylogenetic and molecular evolutionary analyses

DNA sequences were analyzed using GENEDOC (Free Software Foundation, Inc. Boston, USA) and aligned using Clustal X [35]. The phylogenetic relationship of the amplified fragments from endemic dog samples and the 116-bp sequences from different species of Leishmania deposited in GenBank was built-up with MEGA version 4.0 [36] and UPGMA [37]. Evolutionary distances were calculated using the method proposed by Jukes and Cantor [38]. Bootstrap analysis [39] was performed with 1000 replicates.

Statistical analysis

Since true-negative values detected by each test were unknown, in the present study the sensitivity of each test was defined against the total number of samples positive with at least one method following the method described by Lachaud L et al. [40].

Epi Info Tm 6.0 (CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA) was used for data statistical analysis by the X2 test for the comparison between PCR, ELISA, and dipstick in the detection of CanL.

Results

Serological and PCR detection results

A total of 106 dogs, which went through at least one sandfly season, were chosen for serological tests and PCR detection. Six out of 106 (5.66%) dogs presented one or more clinical signs of CanL while other 100 dogs were asymptomatic (94.34%). Results for clinical status, serology (including ELISA and dipstick test), and PCR detection are shown in Table 1. Only five dogs were positive demonstrated by all methods in which three of them showed clinical signs. Thirty-nine of the dogs were positive by ELISA with five of them showed clinical signs. One dog with clinical signs of leishmaniasis was negative by ELISA. Ten of the dogs were positive by dipstick test in which only three of them showed clinical signs. The presence of parasite DNA was detected in 55 dogs, all six dogs showing clinical signs showed positive for parasite DNA.

Table 1.

Clinical status, serology and PCR detection results in dogs living in Jiuzhaigou County

Group No. ELISA Dipstick PCR Clinical status
No. of
symptomatic dogs		 No. of
asymptomatic dogs		 Total no.
of dogs
1 + + + 3 2 5
2 + - + 2 25 27
3 + + - 0 1 1
4 + - - 0 6 6
5 - + + 0 3 3
6 - + - 0 1 1
7 - - + 1 19 20
8 - - - 0 43 43
Total 6 100 106
Open in a new tab

The sensitivity of each technique was calculated using the total number of samples positive with at lease one method [38]. Thus, the sensitivities of PCR, ELISA, and dipstick test for detection of canine infection with Leishmania in the endemic area were 87.30% (55/63), 61.90% (39/63) and 15.87% (10/63), respectively (Table 2). The results showed that PCR detection was the most sensitive method compared to ELISA (p = 0.001) and dipstick (p < 0.001), and ELISA method was more sensitive than dipstick test (p < 0.001).

Table 2.

Sensitivities of different methods used in the detection of canine infection with Leishmania in Jiuzhaigou

ELISA (%) Dipstick (%) PCR (%) Total (%)
Symptomatic dogs (6) 5 (83.3) 3 (50) 6 (100) 6 (100)
Asymptomatic dogs (100) 34 (34) 7 (7) 49 (49) 57 (57)
Total (106) 39 10 55 63
% 36.79% 9.43% 51.88% 59.43%
Sensitivity* 61.90% 15.87% 87.30% -
Open in a new tab

*: Sensitivities were calculated as the number of positive cases of one method against total number of positive cases by at least one method.

DNA sequence and phylogenetic analyses

Twenty PCR products amplified from dog blood samples and one PCR product from cultured L. infantum were subcloned into pGEM-T vector and 10 clones from each PCR product were randomly picked for DNA sequencing. Alignment of the obtained sequences showed that amplified 116-bp sequences contained large variations among the samples from dog blood or from the cultured parasite. Based on the sequence variation two classes of the sequence were divided. The main difference is that two stretches of sequence AAAA in Class I were mutated to TTTT in Class II (Figure 2). Forty more clones from cultured parasite DNA PCR products were sequenced and the variation was confirmed with 80% of Class I and 20% of Class II.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Alignment of two classes of 116-bp sequences amplified from kDNA minicircles of L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC.

The two classes of 116-bp fragment sequences isolated from the conserved region of Leishmania kDNA minicircles from laboratory-maintained L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC were submitted to GenBank (Bankit) (accession nos.: Class I: HQ585883; Class II: HQ585885). The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the sequence comparison of class I 116-bp fragment of Leishmania kDNA minicircles conserved region among laboratory-maintained L. infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC and other Leishmania species available in the GenBank (Figure 3). As seen in shown in Figure 2, L. infantum isolate MCAN/CN/90/SC used in this study was different from but closely related to the three other existing L infantum isolates. However, L. donovani and L. infantum were linked in a grouping different from the Leishmanias associated with cutaneous disease.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Dendrogram based on sequence comparison of Leishmania spp. 116-bp fragment in the consverd region of Leishmania kDNA minicircles. The dendrogram was constructed using the UPGMA method. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1000 replicates. Leishmania spp used in this tree and their GenBank accession numbers: L..infantum MCAN/CN/90/SC (SC, HQ585883); Three L. infantum isolates: MCAN/ES/97/LLM-32 (LLM-32, Z35500.1); Li-TK-91 (EU370899.1); AJS-D2PST, (Z35292.1); L. donovani (Ld-IN-34, EU370884.1), Leishmania major (Lm-FR-10, EU370900.1), Leishmania braziliensis (Lb-PR-62, EU370879.1), Leishmania amazonensis (Lam-331, EU370875), and Leishmania tropica (K27, Z32843.1).

Discussion

Currently, two epidemiological types of VL, anthroponotic (AVL) and zoonotic (ZVL), exist in western China [19,41]. AVL is endemic only in the oases of the plains of Kashi prefecture, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Most cases occur in juvenile and adult people. ZVL can be divided into two subtypes, namely mountainous and desert sub-type [22]. The desert sub-type is endemic in the northwestern desert regions of China, including Xinjiang and western Inner Mongolia [22]. These regions were uncultivated deserts for a long time before being populated by immigrants who introduced agricultural activities, consequently, autochthonous infantile kala-azar occurs. This region is considered to be a natural nidus of kala-azar-infected wild animals that are presumably considered to be the source of human infection. The wild species, Phlebotomus wui and Phlebotomus alexandri, are the vectors infesting different specific landscapes, dry desert region and the stony desert, respectively [22,41]. The mountainous sub-type occurs in the western mountainous and hilly regions of Gansu, Sichuan, Shaanxi, and Shanxi provinces of China. Patients are mostly children younger than ten years old, and infants are commonly infected. These patients are distributed sporadically. The vector of this form is wild P. chinensis [22,41]. Elimination and prohibition of dogs in the endemic area markedly reduced the number of human cases, thus dogs are likely the principal source of infection for the mountainous sub-type [18]. Therefore, evaluation of prevalence of Leishmania infection in dogs is of great importance to understand the epidemiology of the mountainous sub-type of ZVL and to prevent transmission of human VL. In this study we collected blood samples from dogs in an endemic area of Jiuzhaigou County, China and evaluated the prevalence of L. infantum infection in these dogs using PCR, ELISA, and immunochromatographic dipstick tests.

According to our results, among 106 dogs studied, 6 (5.66%) dogs presented CanL signs and 100 (94.34%) dogs were asymptomatic. The seroprevalence of dog infection in Jiuzhaigou County is 36.79% by ELISA, higher than those obtained by various authors throughout the Mediterranean basin [42-44]. However, the positive rate detected by dipstick test (9.43%) is much lower than that detected by ELISA in this study. The highest positive rate (51.88%) was found in the PCR detection of parasitic DNA in the blood samples of dogs with significant higher than that of ELISA (p = 0.001) and dipstick (p < 0.001), indicating the PCR method is the most sensitive to detect Leishmania infection in dogs. The result is consistent with that found by other studies [25,45,46].

In epidemiological studies on CanL, serological and parasitic DNA detection are sensitive and specific to detect Leishmania infection in dogs [24,25,31,42]. For detection of symptomatic dogs, the two methods obtained comparable sensitivity in this study, while in detection of asymptomatic dogs PCR method was more sensitive than serological methods. The probable reason is that asymptomatic infection dogs may have low infective burden and therefore the lower levels of anti-Leishmania antibodies [47] while PCR can detect as few as a single parasite theoretically. In this study, most of dogs (94.34%) were asymptomatic, resulting in lower positive rates detected by serological methods than that by PCR. In addition, asymptomatic but seropositive dogs may indicate previous contact with parasite with some of these seropositive dogs being PCR-negative [42]. The biopsy samples of lymph node, bone marrow, skin or conjunctive were usually taken to detect Leishmania infection by PCR and can yield excellent sensitivity [40,42]. Lachaud L. et al demonstrated that PCR method targeting kDNA (K13A-K13B) using peripheral blood effectively detected the parasite in symptomatic or asymptomatic infected dogs [48], while other study indicated that blood sample reduces the sensitivity of the test [25]. However, the PCR test based on blood is advantageous than tissues because blood sample can be obtained safely and less invasively, and relatively easy to process. In diagnosis of symptomatic dogs with leishmaniasis rk39 dipstick gave reliable results [49,50], however, our results demonstrated that the test is not suitable to detect asymptomatic infection of dogs with Leishmania. The probable reason is that k39 antigen is only expressed during active infections [51,52].

The prevalence of Leishmania infection in dogs that we found in Jiuzhaigou County is very high (total 59.43%), especially in asymptomatic dogs up to 57% (57/100). Some studies indicated that asymptomaticlly infected dogs with Leishmania were not infective to sandflies [53,54], while some others demonstrated that asymptomatically infected dogs were the sources of the parasite for vector sandflies and as a consequence play an active role in the transmission of L. infantum to human [13-17]. The high prevalence of Leishmania infection in dogs in regions where leishmaniasis is endemic has to be taken into account in any campaign aiming at controlling CanL. In fact, some authors have demonstrated that removing seropositive dogs is an insufficient method to eradicate CanL [55,56]. In this study we found that Leishmania DNA could even be detected in serologically negative dogs. These seronegative dogs are also possible sources of Leishmanial transmission. These data provide a better estimation of transmission level of the parasite in the endemic area, therefore are essential for designing and implementing appropriate control measures.

The results of this study demonstrated that the amplification of 116-bp fragment in the conserved region of Leishmania kDNA minicircles could be used for detection of parasite DNA in the blood samples of infected dogs. The sequence data of the PCR products also showed the significant diversity among the samples isolated from different dogs and from lab maintained strain of L. infantum (MCAN/CN/90/SC). More than 20% of the amplified 116-bp fragments showed two stretches of sequence AAAA mutated to TTTT and therefore named as Class II compared to the regular Class I type with no mutations. Based on our findings and the findings of others [32,57], it suggests that a certain percentage of sequence divergence existed in the constant region of the minicircle classes not only among species but also within the species or even within the same parasite. It could be due to recombination or mutation events occurring in the kDNA molecules [43]. Based on the divergence existing in the constant region of the minicircle classes among Leishmania spp., in this study we constructed a phylogenetic tree revealing that L. infantum isolate MCAN/CN/90/SC used in this study was closely related to three other existing L infantum isolates, and more genetically related to other visceralizing species such as L. donovani than to those Leishmania species associated with cutaneous disease. Therefore, the sequence data of Leishmania kDNA minicircles could possibly be used for distinguishing species or strains of Leishmania. It is the plan to collect parasite samples from different endemic areas of China to genetically type the strains or isolates of L. infantum based on the diversities of the Leishmania kDNA minicircles

Conclusions

The results from present study demonstrated that more than half of dogs living in endemic Jiuzhaigou County, China, were infected by L. infantum. Control measures, such as treatment or eradication of infected dogs or prohibition of maintaining dogs, must be taken against these infected dogs due to their role in the transmission of the infection to vectors. The phylogenetic tree based on sequences of Leishmania kDNA conserved region provides useful way to distinguish Leishmania species.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

JYW designed and conducted the study, performed data collection/analysis and drafted the manuscript. YH assisted in field work. CHG, YW and HTC carried out PCR detection and statistical analysis. YTY carried out the immunoassays. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Jun-Yun Wang, Email: wang_junyun@yahoo.com.

Yu Ha, Email: jzgcdczhk@163.com.

Chun-Hua Gao, Email: gaochunhua1976@yahoo.com.cn.

Yong Wang, Email: yongwang100@hotmail.com.

Yue-Tao Yang, Email: yangyuetao@yahoo.cn.

Hai-Tang Chen, Email: happycht2010@126.com.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Bin Zhan from George Washington University and Professor Xiao-nong Zhou for reviewing and revising the manuscript. Thanks are also addressed to the staff from the Jiuzhaigou Center for Disease Control and Prevention for their kind assistance in field investigations. This work is supported by the National S & T Major Program (Grant No. 2008ZX10004-011 and 2009ZX10004-201).

References

  1. Alvar J, Yactayo S, Bern C. Leishmaniasis and poverty. Trends Parasitol. 2006;22:552–557. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chai JJ, Zuo XP, Zhang S, Zhao JP, Zhang JM. In: Epidemiology and Control of Leishmaniasis in Central Eurasia. Matsumoto Y. Tokyo, editor. International Press Editing Centre Incorporation; 1999. The Desert-type kala-azar in Xinjiang, China; pp. 15–19. [Matsumoto Y (Series Editor): Research Report Series, No 1.] [Google Scholar]
  3. Reithinger R, Davies CR. Canine leishmaniasis: novel strategies for control. Trends Parasitol. 2002;18:289–290. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02296-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Quinnell RJ, Courtenay O. Transmission, reservoir hosts and control of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis. Parasitol. 2009;136:1915–1934. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009991156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashford RW, Desjeux P, Deraadt P. Estimation of population at risk of infection and number of cases of Leishmaniasis. Parasitol Today. 1992;8:104–105. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(92)90249-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou Xiao-Nong, Shan Lv, Yang Guo-Jing, Kristensen Thomas K, Bergquist N Robert, Utzinger Jürg, Malone John B. Spatial epidemiology in zoonotic parasitic diseases: insights gained at the 1st International Symposium on Geospatial Health in Lijiang, China. Parasit Vectors. 2009;2:10. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Filipe DT. Canine leishmaniosis in South America. Parasites & Vectors. 2009;2(Suppl 1):1. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-2-S1-S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Domenico O, Filipe DT. Canine and feline vector-borne diseases in Italy: current situation and perspectives. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:2. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-3-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lise C, Annelise T, Anne M, Gilles B, Paul R, Dedet JP. Environmental risk mapping of canine leishmaniasis in France. Parasit Vectors. 2010;3:31. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-3-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ciaramella P, Oliva G, Luna RD, Gradoni L, Ambrosio R, Cortese L, Scalone A, Persechino A. A retrospective clinical study of canine leishmaniasis in 150 dogs naturally infected by Leishmania infantum. Vet Rec. 1997;141:539–543. doi: 10.1136/vr.141.21.539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Koutinas AF, Polizopoulou ZS, Saridomichelakis MN, Argyriadis D, Fytianou A, Plevraki KG. Clinical considerations on canine visceral leishmaniasis in Greece: a retrospective study of 158 cases (1989-1996) J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1999;35:376–383. doi: 10.5326/15473317-35-5-376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dereure J, Pratlong F, Dedet JP. In: Proceedings of a Canine Leishmaniasis Forum. Killick-Kendrick R, editor. Stiges. Barcelona; 1999. Geographical distribution and the identification of parasites causing canine leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean Basin. From canine leishmaniasis: an update; pp. 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  13. Alvar J, Molina R, San Andrés M, Tesouro M, Nieto J, Vitutia M, González F, San Andrés MD, Boggio J, Rodriguez F. Canine leishmaniasis: clinical, parasitological and entomological follow-up after chemotherapy. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1994;88:371–378. doi: 10.1080/00034983.1994.11812879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Molina R, Amela C, Nieto J, San-Andrés M, González F, Castillo JA, Lucientes J, Alvar J. Infectivity of dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum to colonized Phlebotomus perniciosus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994;88:491–493. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(94)90446-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Michalsky EM, Rocha MF, da Rocha Lima AC, França-Silva JC, Pires MQ, Oliveira FS, Pacheco RS, dos Santos SL, Barata RA, Romanha AJ, Fortes-Dias CL, Dias ES. Infectivity of seropositive dogs, showing different clinical forms of leishmaniasis, to Lutzomyia longipalpis phlebotomine sandflies. Vet Parasitol. 2007;147:67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moshfe A, Mohebali M, Edrissian G, Zarei Z, Akhoundi B, Kazemi B, Jamshidi S, Mahmoodi M. Canine visceral leishmaniasis: asymptomatic infected dogs as a source of L. infantum infection. Acta Trop. 2009;112:101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Soares MR, de Mendonça IL, do Bonfim JM, Rodrigues JA, Werneck GL, Costa CH. Canine visceral leishmaniasis in Teresina, Brazil: Relationship between clinical features and infectivity for sand flies. Acta Trop. 2011;117:6–9. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guan LR, Shen WX. Recent advances in visceral leishmaniasis in China. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Pub Health. 1991;22:291–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Guan LR, Qu JQ, Chai JJ. Leishmaniasis in China--present status of prevalence and some suggestions on its control. End Dis Bull. 2000;15:49–52. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang JY, Feng Y, Gao CH, Jin CF, Chen SB, Zhang CJ. Asymptomatic Leishmania infection in human population of Wenxian County, Gansu Province. Chin J Parasitol Parasiti Dis. 2007;25:62–64. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guan LR, Zuo XP, Yimamu. Reemergence of visceral leishmaniasis in Kashi Prefecture, Xinjiang. Chin J Parasitol Parasitic Dis. 2003;21:285. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guan LR. Current status of kala-azar and vector control in China. Bull World Health Organ. 1991;69:595–601. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang L, Wang Y, Jin S, Wu Z, Chin DP, Koplan JP. Emergence and control of infectious diseases in China. Lancet. 2008;372:1598–1605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61365-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang JY, Chen SB, Gao CH, Jin CF, Feng Y, Zhang ZJ. Survey on the Leishmania infantum asymptomatic infection in dogs in Wenxian county of Gansu Province. Chin J Zoonoses. 2006;22:734–737. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Reale S, Maxia L, Vitale F, Glorioso NS, Caracappa S, Vesco G. Detection of Leishmania infantum in Dogs by PCR with Lymph Node Aspirates and Blood. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:2931–2935. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.9.2931-2935.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Quaresma PF, Murta SM, Ferreira Ede C, da Rocha-Lima AC, Xavier AA, Gontijo CM. Molecular diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis: identification of Leishmania species by PCR-RFLP and quantification of parasite DNA by real-time PCR. Acta Trop. 2009;111:289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2009.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kovalenko Dmitriy A, Razakov Shavkat A, Ponirovsky Evgeny N, Warburg Alon, Nasyrova Rokhat M, Ponomareva Valentina I, Fatullaeva Aziza A, Nasereddin Abdelmajeed, Klement Eyal, Alam Mohammad Z, Schnur Lionel F, Jaffe Chrales L, Schonian Gabriele, Baneth Gad. Canine leishmaniosis and its relationship to human visceral leishmaniasis in Eastern Uzbekistan. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:58. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Martinez Veronica, Quilez Javier, Sanchez Armand, Roura Xavier, Francino Olga, Altet Laura. Canine leishmaniasis: the key points for qPCR result interpretation. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4:57. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Leontides LS, Saridomichelakis MN, Billinis C, Kontos V, Koutinas AF, Galatos AD, Mylonakis ME. A cross-sectional study of Leishmania spp. infection in clinically healthy dogs with polymerase chain reaction and serology in Greece. Vet Parasitol. 2002;109:19–27. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00201-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schönian G, Nasereddin A, Dinse N, Schweynoch C, Schallig HD, Presber W, Jaffe CL. PCR diagnosis and characterization of Leishmania in local and imported clinical samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;47:349–358. doi: 10.1016/S0732-8893(03)00093-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cortes S, Rolão N, Ramada J, Campino L. PCR as a rapid and sensitive tool in the diagnosis of human and canine leishmaniasis using Leishmania donovani s.l.-specific kinetoplastid primers. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004;98:12–17. doi: 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)00002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rodgers MR, Stephen J, Wirth DF. Amplification and diagnosis of Leishmania. Exp Parasitol. 1990;71:267–275. doi: 10.1016/0014-4894(90)90031-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Spithill TW, Grumont RJ. Identification of species, strains and clones of Leishmania by characterization of kinetoplast DNA minicircles. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1984;12:217–236. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(84)90137-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gao CH, Wang JY, Yang YT, Bao YF. Study on PCR method for detecting the asymptomatic infection of Leishmania infantum. Chin J Parasitol Parasiti Dis. 2006;24:92–96. (in Chinese) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mor Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sneath PHA, Sokal RR. Numerical taxonomy: the principles and practice of numerical classification. San Francisco; 1973. [Google Scholar]
  38. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. In: Mammalian protein metabolism. Munro HN, editor. New York: Academic Press; 1969. Evolution of protein molecules; pp. 21–132. [Google Scholar]
  39. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;24:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lachaud L, Chabbert E, Dubessay P, Dereure J, Lamothe J, Dedet JP, Bastien P. Value of PCR methods for diagnosis and prevalence of canine visceral leishmaniasis and detection of asymptomatic carriers. Parasitol. 2002;125:197–207. doi: 10.1017/s0031182002002081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang Jun-Yun, Chun-Hua Gao, Yang Yue-Tao, Chen Hai-Tang, Xue-Hua Zhu, Shan Lv, Chen Sheng-Bang, Tong Su-Xiang, Steinmann Peter, Ziegelbauer Kathrin, Zhou Xiao-Nong. An outbreak of the desert sub-type of zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis in Jiashi,Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China. Parasitol Int. 2010;59:331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Solano-Gallego L, Morell P, Arboix M, Alberola J, Ferrer L. Prevalence of Leishmania infantum Infection in Dogs Living in an Area of Canine Leishmaniasis Endemicity Using PCR on Several Tissues and Serology. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:560–563. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.2.560-563.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Deplazes P, Grimm F, Papaprodromou M, Cavaliero T, Gramiccia M, Christofi G, Christofi N, Economides P, Eckert J. Canine leishmaniosis in Cyprus due to Leishmania infantum MON 1. Acta Trop. 1998;71:169–178. doi: 10.1016/S0001-706X(98)00064-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sideris V, Papadopoulou G, Dotsika E, Karagouni E. Asymptomatic canine leishmaniasis in Greater Athens area, Greece. Eur J Epidemiol. 1999;15:271–276. doi: 10.1023/A:1007526401175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Oliva G, Scalone A, Manzillo VF, Gramiccia M, Pagano A, Di Muccio T, Gradoni L. Incidence and time course of Leishmania infantum infections examined by parasitological, serologic, and nested-PCR techniques in a cohort of naïve dogs exposed to three consecutive transmission seasons. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1318–1322. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1318-1322.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Chargui N, Haouas N, Gorcii M, Lahmar S, Guesmi M, Ben Abdelhafidh A, Mezhoud H, Babba H. Use of PCR, IFAT and in vitro culture in the detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs and evaluation of the prevalence of canine leishmaniasis in a low endemic area in Tunisia. Parasite. 2009;16:65–69. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2009161065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Iniesta L, Fernández-Barredo S, Bulle B, Gómez MT, Piarroux R, Gállego M, Alunda JM, Portús M. Diagnostic techniques to detect cryptic leishmaniasis in dogs. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002;9:1137–1141. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.9.5.1137-1141.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lachaud L, Marchergui-Hammami S, Chabbert E, Dereure J, Dedet JP, Bastien P. Comparison of six PCR methods using peripheral blood for detection of canine visceral leishmaniasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:210–215. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.1.210-215.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mohebali M, Taran M, Zarei Z. Rapid detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs: comparative study using an immunochromatographic dipstick rk39 test and direct agglutination. Vet Parasitol. 2004;121:239–245. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Reithinger R, Quinnell RJ, Alexander B, Davies CR. Rapid detection of Leishmania infantum infection in dogs: comparative study using an immunochromatographic dipstick test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:2352–2356. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2352-2356.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sundar S, Rai M. Laboratory diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002;9:951–958. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.9.5.951-958.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Burns JM Jr, Shreffler WG, Benson DR, Ghalib HW, Badaro R, Reed SG. Molecular characterization of a kinesin-related antigen of Leishmania chagasi that detects specific antibody in African and American visceral leishmaniasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:775–779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gradoni L, Maroli M, Gramiccia M, Mancianti F. Leishmania infantum infection rates in Phlebotomus perniciosus fed on naturally infected dogs under antimonial treatment. Med Vet Entomol. 1987;1:339–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1987.tb00364.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Dye C. Leishmaniasis epidemiology: the theory catches up. Parasitol. 1992;104(Suppl 1):7–18. doi: 10.1017/s0031182000075211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ashford DA, David JR, Freire M, David R, Sherlock I, Eulalio MC, Sampaio DP, Badaro R. Studies on control of visceral leishmaniasis: impact of dog control on canine and human visceral leishmaniasis in Jacobina, Bahia, Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:53–57. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Dietze R, Barros GB, Teixeira L, Harris J, Michelson K, Falqueto A, Corey R. Effect of eliminating seropositive canines on the transmission of visceral leishmaniasis in Brazil. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1240–1242. doi: 10.1086/516096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rogers WO, Wirth DF. Kinetoplast DNA minicircles: regions of extensive sequence divergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:565–569. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.2.565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Parasites & Vectors are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES