By microarray and qPCR, this study determined gene expression changes in the retinal ganglion cell layer of rat eyes with mild pressure-induced optic nerve injury, providing insights into early molecular events in glaucoma.
Abstract
Purpose.
To identify patterns of early gene expression changes in the retinal ganglion cell layer (GCL) of a rodent model of chronic glaucoma.
Methods.
Prolonged elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) was produced in rats by episcleral vein injection of hypertonic saline (N = 30). GCLs isolated by laser capture microdissection were grouped by grading of the nerve injury (<25% axon degeneration for early injury; >25% for advanced injury). Gene expression was determined by cDNA microarray of independent GCL RNA samples. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was used to further examine the expression of selected genes.
Results.
By array analysis, 533 GCL genes (225 up, 308 down) were significantly regulated in early injury. Compared to only one major upregulated gene class of metabolism regulation, more were downregulated, including mitochondria, ribosome, proteasome, energy pathways, protein synthesis, protein folding, and synaptic transmission. qPCR confirmed an early upregulation of Atf3. With advanced injury, 1790 GCL genes were significantly regulated (997 up, 793 down). Altered gene categories included upregulated protein synthesis, immune response, and cell apoptosis and downregulated dendrite morphogenesis and axon extension. Of all the early changed genes, 50% were not present in advanced injury. These uniquely affected genes were mainly associated with upregulated transcription regulation and downregulated protein synthesis.
Conclusions.
Early GCL gene responses to pressure-induced injury are characterized by an upregulation of Atf3 and extensive downregulation in genes associated with cellular metabolism and neuronal functions. Most likely, these changes represent those specific to RGCs and are thus potentially important for enhancing RGC survival in glaucoma.
The progressive loss of vision in glaucoma patients has been attributed to degeneration of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons and the eventual death of these cells. As intraocular pressure (IOP) remains the best established risk factor for glaucoma, therapy for this blinding disease continues to rely heavily on lowering pressure by medical and surgical measures. Although pressure reduction has been effective in preventing onset of glaucoma and delaying its progression,1,2 some patients do not respond well or are intolerant of these treatments, whereas others continue to experience vision loss despite significant reduction in IOP.
Recently, neuroprotective strategies other than pressure lowering, including supplementation of neurotrophins and prevention of caspase activation and apoptosis, have been proposed and are being investigated as new goals for glaucoma therapy.3,4 Effective neuroprotection, aimed at salvaging functional RGCs and their axons before they are committed to die, requires early intervention and targeting of upstream events. These early changes may involve increased susceptibility of RGCs to elevated IOP, which could explain progressive vision loss in patients despite lowered eye pressure. Conversely, they may be protective mechanisms that could be therapeutically enhanced. Identification of the early critical molecular events in RGCs would add to our understanding of the nature of glaucomatous injury and provide potential targets for neuroprotective strategies.
The primary injury in glaucoma is now widely believed to be axonal at the lamina in the optic nerve head.5–7 However, the nature of the injury and the initial molecular events occurring in injured RGCs are largely unknown. Studies have described early morphologic changes in RGCs,8–10 suggesting that structural and possibly functional changes occur well in advance of their death. Also, pathways involved in RGC soma degeneration, although not well characterized, have been suggested to be distinct from those in axon degeneration in glaucoma.11 To examine global changes in gene expression, several studies have applied genomewide analysis of microarrays to the retina of rodent and primate glaucoma models as well as the DBA/2J mice.12–17 These studies have found significant regulation of gene expression in the retina and implicate multiple processes in glaucomatous injury, including neuroinflammation, glia activation, apoptosis, and cytoskeleton-based processes. However, because RGCs represent only a small fraction of the total retinal cell population, in these studies performed on whole retina samples, many responses specific to RGCs may have been masked. In an effort to identify changes more specific to RGCs, Wang et al.18 studied global gene expressions in individual RGCs captured by laser in experimental glaucoma and reported extensive expression changes in genes associated with multiple signaling pathways and apoptosis. Like the whole-retina studies, however, this study did not specifically target the events of early injury.
Using a rodent glaucoma model in which chronic IOP elevation is achieved by injection of hypertonic saline into episcleral veins,19 we have recently demonstrated that detection of RGC responses can be greatly enhanced by analyzing just the RGC layer (GCL) compared with the whole retina.20 Successfully isolating the GCL from the whole retina by laser capture microdissection (LCM) and applying cDNA microarray analysis to the GCL mRNA, we identified a significantly larger number of genes with altered expression in the GCL compared with those in whole retinas of eyes with comparable injury. That report, which focused on responses in eyes with extensive nerve injury, represents only part of a larger study in which we examined the GCL in eyes with all grades of optic nerve injury. Here, we present the complete analysis, but mainly concentrate on early-injury responses that, as mentioned previously, are likely to be important for understanding the cellular mechanisms of glaucoma and identifying their therapeutic implications.
Methods
All animals were treated in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research and were approved by the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) for use in all the experiments.
Glaucoma Model
Eight-month-old Brown Norway rats, housed in constant low-level light,21 were injected unilaterally with hypertonic saline through episcleral veins to obstruct aqueous outflow.19 IOP was measured in awake animals at least three times a week with a handheld tonometer (TonoLab; Icare Finland Oy, Espoo, Finland) and monitored typically for 5 weeks. A weighted mean IOP elevation was calculated for each injected eye by dividing the cumulative IOP by the number of postinjection days. The cumulative IOP was determined as the area under the curve of the plot of days after injection versus the corresponding IOP measurement, subtracting the mean of the corresponding values for control eyes.
Pressure-induced optic nerve injuries were evaluated as previously described.21 Briefly, optic nerves were removed, postfixed in glutaraldehyde, and embedded in plastic, and nerve cross sections were graded from 1 (no injury) to 5 (active degeneration involving the whole nerve area). Sections were graded by five masked observers and the grades were averaged. We have previously determined that each unit of grade corresponds to an approximate 12% increase in the number of degenerating axons in the optic nerve.21 In this study, for the purpose of effective analysis, glaucoma model eyes were grouped by nerve grading: the early-injury group, including those with grade <2.5, or less than 25% axon degeneration, and the advanced injury group, composed of eyes with nerve grades >2.5, or >25% axon degeneration.
Laser Capture Microdissection
GCL was isolated from paraffin-embedded retinal sections, as previously described.20 Briefly, whole globes were collected and postfixed in 100% ethanol, and embedded in paraffin. After the blocks were sectioned and the slices deparaffinized, LCM (Arcturus PixCell II LCM system; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) was immediately performed on multiple retinal sections from each globe using typical parameters as follows: 7.5-μm spot diameters, 0.7- to 1.2-ms duration, and 60- to 80-mW laser power.
RNA Isolation and Amplification
Total RNA was purified from GCL captured on LCM caps (Capsure Macro (Molecular Devices) by using an isolation kit (Arcturus PicoPure RNA; Molecular Devices). RNA amount was quantitated with a fluorometric assay (RiboQuant; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). At the OHSU Gene Microarray Shared Resource Facility, all samples of RNA were subjected to two rounds of linear amplification (MessageAmp aRNA Amplification Kit; Ambion, Austin, TX). Yield of the amplified (a)RNA, as well as its integrity, was assessed on a bioanalyzer (model 2100; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).
cDNA Microarrays and Data Analysis
A total of 6 control and 24 injected eyes with elevated IOP, including 7 eyes with a shorter term of IOP exposure (<5 weeks), were used in the microarray analysis. Nerve evaluation determined that there were 9 eyes with early nerve injury and 15 with advanced injury. The latter included eyes with extensive nerve injury (grade 5) that had been analyzed separately.20 Amplified RNA was reverse transcribed and dye-labeled before hybridization, to probe sequences of SMCmou8400A and SMCmou6600A cDNA microarrays. These steps, together with slide scanning and data compilation, were all completed at the OHSU Gene Microarray Shared Resource Facility. The cDNA microarrays contain a total of 15,400 cDNA probes and represent the initial NIA (National Institute of Aging, Bethesda, MD) 15k mouse library (http://lgsun.grc.nia.nih.gov/cDNA/15k.html). Each probe was represented by two duplicate spots on two identical slides, making four technical duplicates for each array. Gene expression data were reported as ratios of average signal intensity (local background subtracted) in each sample to that of a common reference standard derived by combining aRNA aliquots from all samples. Data were normalized by using a modified Lowess procedure22 at the OHSU Microarray Facility.
Genes with significantly different expression between injury groups (>1.3 fold) were identified by using multiclass comparison analysis in the web tool Significant Analysis of Microarrays (SAM, version 2.5; http://www-stat.stanford.edu/∼tibs/SAM; provided in the public domain by Stanford University, Stanford, CA) with 2% FDR and followed by ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer posttest (P < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons). DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 2008 (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/ National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Disease, Bethesda, MD) was used to determine significantly regulated functional classes of the affected genes based on EASE scores, using the controlled vocabulary of the gene ontology consortium (http://www.geneontology.org/).
Quantitative Real-Time Reverse Transcription PCR (qPCR)
To expand the sample size, we combined an additional group of animals with those in microarray analysis, making a total of 13 control and 30 glaucoma model eyes (14 in early and 16 in advanced injury group) for qPCR analysis. Gene-specific primers were designed (Primer Designer 4 or Clone Manager Professional, ver. 9.0; both from Science Ed Software, Cary NC) and are listed in Supplementary Table S1, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental. All primers were designed to target the mRNA region within 350 bp of its 3′ polyadenylation site. Using random primers (250 ng; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and reverse transcriptase (SuperScript III; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), we reverse transcribed 20 ng aRNA for each sample and 2 to 400 ng reference aRNA for the standard curve. Expression levels were determined by qPCR on a real-time PCR system (LightCycler, software 3.5, and DNA Master SYBR Green 1 kit; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Based on a lack of significant change in ribosomal protein 16 (Rps16) in the microarray study, this gene was used as the housekeeping gene for normalization,23 rather than glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh), which showed more change in these samples.
All data were expressed as a percentage of the control values. Statistical analysis was performed by comparing the glaucoma model eyes to the controls by using an unpaired t-test (Excel; Microsoft, Redmond, WA), and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
IOP History of Injury Groups in Microarray
The cumulative IOP exposure of the early-injury group averaged 69.8 ± 94.4 mm Hg (mean ± SD). The average grading for nerve injury in this group was 1.5 ± 0.4 (mean ± SD). For the group with advanced injury, the average cumulative IOP exposure was 314.4 ± 261.0 mm Hg, and the nerve injury grades averaged 3.9 ± 0.8. The results are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
IOP Histories of Early and Advanced Injury Groups in Microarray Analysis
| Group | Eyes (n) | Injury Grade* | Cumulative Elevated IOP* (mm Hg × d) | Mean IOP* (mm Hg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | 6 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 21.6 ± 1.4 | |
| Early injury | 9 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 69.8 ± 94.4 | 23.3 ± 2.3 |
| Advanced injury | 15 | 3.9 ± 0.8 | 314.4 ± 261.0 | 30.8 ± 7.1 |
Mean ± SD.
Significant GCL Genes Identified in Early Injury
Comparison of the early injury to the controls identified a total of 533 genes significantly altered in expression, with 225 upregulated and 308 downregulated (complete list in Supplementary Table S2, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental). Listed in Tables 2 and 3 are the 30 genes with the most increased or reduced expression, respectively. The most upregulated three genes were activating transcription factor 3 (Atf3; 3.4-fold), a member of the ATF/CREB family of transcription factors, and the acute and stress response genes lipocalin 2 (Lcn2; 2.98-fold), and heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1; 2.95-fold). The three most downregulated genes included: cold shock domain containing E1, RNA binding (Csde1; −2.25-fold), a cytoplasmic RNA-binding protein involved in transcription regulation; glycolytic enzyme triosephosphate isomerase 1 (Tpi1; −2.22-fold); and Dickkopf homolog 3 (Xenopus laevis; Dkk3; −2.18-fold), a divergent member of the Wnt signaling regulator Dkk family protein with an antiapoptotic and cytoprotective role in the retina.24–26
Table 2.
The Thirty Most Upregulated Genes in the GCL with Early Nerve Injury
| GenBank Accession | Entrez Gene ID | Gene Name | Gene Symbol | Change (x-Fold) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG067364 | 11910 | Activating transcription factor 3 | Atf3 | 3.40 |
| BG070106 | 16819 | Lipocalin 2 | Lcn2 | 2.98 |
| BG077732 | 15368 | Heme oxygenase (decycling) 1 | Hmox1 | 2.95 |
| BG070357 | 320184 | Leucine rich repeat containing 58 | Lrrc58 | 2.42 |
| BG081601 | 235493 | cDNA sequence BC031353 | BC031353 | 2.42 |
| BG064262 | 18607 | 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-1 | Pdpk1 | 2.33 |
| BG078388 | 225876 | F-box and leucine-rich repeat protein 11 | Fbxl11 | 2.27 |
| BG069041 | 216965 | TAO kinase 1 | Taok1 | 2.27 |
| BG077145 | Transcribed locus, strongly similar to NP 904337.1 NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 | 2.26 | ||
| BG070105 | 105387 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C14 | Akr1c14 | 2.26 |
| BG077271 | 53333 | Translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 40 homolog (yeast) | Tomm40 | 2.25 |
| BG067861 | 78785 | CAP-GLY domain containing linker protein family, member 4 | Clip4 | 2.23 |
| BG063282 | 223435 | Triple functional domain (PTPRF interacting) | Trio | 2.19 |
| BG070342 | 67579 | Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 4 | Cpeb4 | 2.15 |
| BG077059 | 66631 | Hippocampus abundant transcript-like 1 | Hiatl1 | 2.14 |
| BG084377 | 20848 | Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 | Stat3 | 2.09 |
| BG070137 | 11855 | Rho GTPase activating protein 5 | Arhgap5 | 2.08 |
| BG078469 | 18970 | Polymerase (DNA directed), beta | Polb | 2.06 |
| BG068032 | 229055 | Zinc finger and BTB domain containing 10 | Zbtb10 | 2.05 |
| BG080829 | 140780 | BMP2 inducible kinase | Bmp2k | 2.01 |
| BG073457 | 106064 | Expressed sequence AW549877 | AW549877 | 1.98 |
| BG074359 | 76205 | STARD3 N-terminal like | Stard3nl | 1.98 |
| BG071123 | 98823 | Expressed sequence AA763515 | AA763515 | 1.96 |
| BG063173 | 109711 | Actinin, alpha 1 | Actn1 | 1.96 |
| AA410046 | 76857 | RIKEN cDNA 4921517N04 gene | 4921517N04Rik | 1.95 |
| BG067684 | 108829 | Jumonji domain containing 1C | Jmjd1c | 1.94 |
| AW536733 | 17101 | Lysosomal trafficking regulator | Lyst | 1.93 |
| BG082399 | 56738 | Molybdenum cofactor synthesis 1 | Mocs1 | 1.90 |
| BG082419 | 109019 | Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold containing 2A | Obfc2a | 1.89 |
| BG066534 | 52615 | Suppressor of zeste 12 homolog (Drosophila) | Suz12 | 1.89 |
Table 3.
The 30 Most Downregulated Genes in the GCL with Early Nerve Injury
| GenBank Accession | Entrez Gene ID | Gene Name | Gene Symbol | Change (x-fold) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG064909 | 229663 | Cold shock domain containing E1, RNA binding | Csde1 | −2.25 |
| BG075608 | 21991 | Triosephosphate isomerase 1 | Tpi1 | −2.22 |
| BG088107 | 50781 | Dickkopf homolog 3 (Xenopus laevis) | Dkk3 | −2.18 |
| BG074818 | 320480 | RIKEN cDNA 6430537K16 gene | 6430537K16Rik | −2.12 |
| BG064838 | 22143 | Tubulin, alpha 1B | Tuba1b | −2.09 |
| BG082031 | 81702 | Ankyrin repeat domain 17 | Ankrd17 | −1.99 |
| BG077276 | 29812 | N-myc downstream regulated gene 3 | Ndrg3 | −1.97 |
| BG065155 | 67134 | Nucleolar protein 5A | Nol5a | −1.95 |
| BG077488 | 19172 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) subunit, beta type 4 | Psmb4 | −1.92 |
| BG080372 | 2 days neonate thymus thymic cells cDNA | −1.91 | ||
| BG071068 | 14688 | Guanine nucleotide binding protein, beta 1 | Gnb1 | −1.91 |
| BG064815 | 16002 | Insulin-like growth factor 2 | Igf2 | −1.91 |
| BG076877 | 12709 | Creatine kinase, brain | Ckb | −1.90 |
| BG088231 | 57320 | Parkinson disease (autosomal recessive, early onset) 7 | Park7 | −1.90 |
| BG070222 | 69684 | Alanyl-tRNA synthetase domain containing 1 | Aarsd1 | −1.89 |
| BG065964 | 14688 | Guanine nucleotide binding protein, beta 1 | Gnb1 | −1.89 |
| BG065432 | 27406 | ATP-binding cassette, sub-family F (GCN20), member 3 | Abcf3 | −1.89 |
| C87546 | 20869 | Serine/threonine kinase 11 | Stk11 | −1.89 |
| BG063860 | Transcribed locus | −1.88 | ||
| BG064831 | 227613 | Tubulin, beta 2c | Tubb2c | −1.88 |
| BG074355 | 12874 | Carboxypeptidase D | Cpd | −1.86 |
| BG064832 | 227613 | Tubulin, beta 2c | Tubb2c | −1.86 |
| BG069067 | 74026 | RIKEN cDNA 4121402D02 gene | 4121402D02Rik | −1.85 |
| BG069637 | Transcribed locus | −1.84 | ||
| BG065478 | 22273 | Ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase core protein 1 | Uqcrc1 | −1.83 |
| BG073254 | 19656 | RNA binding motif protein, X chromosome retrogene | Rbmxrt | −1.83 |
| BG077791 | 66537 | Proteasome maturation protein | Pomp | −1.82 |
| BG074917 | 14886 | General transcription factor II I | Gtf2i | −1.82 |
| BG078478 | 14734 | Glypican 3 | Gpc3 | −1.82 |
| BG086020 | 16499 | Potassium voltage-gated channel, shaker-related subfamily, beta member 3 | Kcnab3 | −1.82 |
Functional Gene Categories Regulated by Early Injury
As summarized in Table 4, with early injury, two biological processes were significantly upregulated: regulation of metabolism and regulation of translational initiation. The single affected cell component associated with the significantly upregulated genes was the nucleus. In contrast, 12 biological processes were downregulated by early injury (Table 5), including generation of precursor metabolites and energy (energy pathways), glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle (the TCA cycle), protein biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation and electron transport, protein folding and catabolism, and nerve–nerve synaptic transmission. Accordingly, cell components and molecular functions associated with mitochondria, ribosome, proteasome, oxidoreductase activity, and unfolded protein binding were downregulated.
Table 4.
Significantly Upregulated Gene Categories Identified by DAVID Analysis in the GCL with Early Nerve Injury
| Gene Categories | Genes (n) | EASE Score |
|---|---|---|
| Biological Process | ||
| Regulation of metabolism | 36 | 0.039 |
| Regulation of translational initiation | 3 | 0.043 |
| Cell Component | ||
| Nucleus | 63 | 0.017 |
| Molecular Function | ||
| Zinc ion binding | 29 | 0.031 |
| Nucleic acid binding | 48 | 0.040 |
| Protein dimerization activity | 6 | 0.042 |
| Transition metal ion binding | 33 | 0.044 |
Table 5.
Significantly Downregulated Gene Categories Identified by DAVID Analysis in GCL with Early Nerve Injury
| Gene Categories | Genes (n) | EASE Score |
|---|---|---|
| Biological Process | ||
| Generation of precursor metabolites and energy | 33 | 0.0000 |
| Cofactor metabolism | 19 | 0.0000 |
| Glycolysis | 8 | 0.0001 |
| Tricarboxylic acid cycle | 7 | 0.0003 |
| Protein biosynthesis | 31 | 0.0004 |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | 9 | 0.0005 |
| Electron transport | 16 | 0.0054 |
| Protein folding | 13 | 0.0120 |
| Protein catabolism | 13 | 0.0140 |
| ATP biosynthesis | 6 | 0.0140 |
| Proton transport | 6 | 0.0230 |
| Nerve-nerve synaptic transmission | 3 | 0.0490 |
| Cell Component | ||
| Mitochondrion | 49 | 0.0000 |
| Ribosome | 19 | 0.0000 |
| Proteasome complex (sensu eukaryota) | 6 | 0.0056 |
| Molecular Function | ||
| Oxidoreductase activity | 29 | 0.0000 |
| Structural constituent of ribosome | 19 | 0.0000 |
| Unfolded protein binding | 13 | 0.0003 |
| Ion transporter activity | 21 | 0.0007 |
| Electron transporter activity | 12 | 0.0027 |
| Nucleoside-triphosphatase activity | 21 | 0.0054 |
| Hydrolase activity, acting on acid anhydrides | 21 | 0.0110 |
| Proteasome endopeptidase activity | 4 | 0.0170 |
| RNA binding | 24 | 0.0170 |
| NADH dehydrogenase activity | 5 | 0.0180 |
| Iron-sulfur cluster binding | 4 | 0.0400 |
Significant GCL Genes Identified in Advanced Injury
With advanced injury, 1790 genes with significantly altered expression were identified, including 997 up- and 793 downregulated genes (complete list in Supplementary Table S3, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental). The most changed 30 genes are listed in Tables 6 (up) and 7 (down). The most upregulated three genes in the early-injury group, Atf3, Lcn2, and Hmox1, showed even greater increases with the advanced injury by 23.84-, 18.63-, and 8.59-fold, respectively. Growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible 45 gamma (Gadd45g), a member of the DNA damage-inducible gene family that inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in response to stress, was upregulated 9.56-fold. The most downregulated genes in advanced injury included ELAV (embryonic lethal, abnormal vision)-like 2 (Elavl2; −4.87-fold) and 14-3-3 family member tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, beta polypeptide (Ywhab; −3.13-fold). Elavl2 encodes an RNA-binding protein, and its transcript has been found to be highly enriched in GCL of human retina.27 The downregulation of Ywhab was consistent with previous findings in individual RGCs exposed to elevated IOP, which showed a similar magnitude of reduction in Ywhab by microarray.18 In advanced injury, Dkk3 remained downregulated (−3.13-fold).
Table 6.
The 30 Most Upregulated Genes in the GCL with Advanced Nerve Injury
| GenBank Accession | Entrez Gene ID | Gene Name | Gene Symbol | Change (x-fold) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG067364 | 11910 | Activating transcription factor 3 | Atf3 | 23.84 |
| BG070106 | 16819 | Lipocalin 2 | Lcn2 | 18.63 |
| BG067419 | 23882 | Growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible 45 gamma | Gadd45g | 9.56 |
| BG077732 | 15368 | Heme oxygenase (decycling 1) | Hmox1 | 8.59 |
| BG085576 | 12825 | Procollagen, type III, alpha 1 | Col3a1 | 7.79 |
| BG070105 | 105387 | Aldo-keto reductase family 1, member C14 | Akr1c14 | 7.15 |
| AU045725 | 75212 | Ring finger protein 121 | Rnf121 | 6.42 |
| AW550999 | 59013 | Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H1 | Hnrph1 | 6.23 |
| BG088567 | 16009 | Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 | Igfbp3 | 6.03 |
| BG068326 | 104174 | Glycine decarboxylase | Gldc | 5.76 |
| AU021372 | 14105 | FUS interacting protein (serine-arginine rich) 1 | Fusip1 | 5.65 |
| BG077473 | 56700 | RIKEN cDNA 0610031J06 gene | 0610031J06Rik | 5.63 |
| BG077076 | 53895 | Caseinolytic peptidase, ATP-dependent, proteolytic subunit homolog (E. coli) | Clpp | 5.62 |
| C79058 | 73945 | OTU domain containing 4 | Otud4 | 5.37 |
| AW556719 | 52040 | Protein phosphatase 1, regulatory subunit 10 | Ppp1r10 | 5.36 |
| AW550998 | Transcribed locus | 5.26 | ||
| AW538113 | 67283 | Solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial thiamine pyrophosphate carrier), member 19 | Slc25a19 | 5.15 |
| AU020524 | 208715 | 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A synthase 1 | Hmgcs1 | 5.13 |
| AW549620 | Transcribed locus | 5.13 | ||
| BG080700 | 27279 | Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12a | Tnfrsf12a | 5.11 |
| AW556082 | 223921 | Achalasia, adrenocortical insufficiency, alacrimia | Aaas | 5.07 |
| BG076966 | 21816 | Transglutaminase 1, K polypeptide | Tgm1 | 5.06 |
| BG064802 | 20692 | Secreted acidic cysteine rich glycoprotein | Sparc | 4.96 |
| BG063357 | 382793 | Metaxin 3 | Mtx3 | 4.95 |
| AW539348 | 66848 | Fucosidase, alpha-L-2, plasma | Fuca2 | 4.90 |
| BG063033 | 66101 | Peptidyl prolyl isomerase H | Ppih | 4.89 |
| BG077017 | 14969 | Histocompatibility 2, class II antigen E beta | H2-Eb1 | 4.86 |
| BG074327 | 12825 | Procollagen, type III, alpha 1 | Col3a1 | 4.83 |
| BG088348 | 233912 | Armadillo repeat containing 5 | Armc5 | 4.79 |
| BG085864 | 114679 | Selenoprotein M | Selm | 4.79 |
Table 7.
The 30 Most Downregulated Genes in the GCL with Advanced Nerve Injury
| GenBank Accession | Entrez Gene ID | Gene Name | Gene Symbol | Change (x-fold) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BG082125 | 15569 | ELAV (embryonic lethal, abnormal vision, Drosophila)-like 2 (Hu antigen B) | Elavl2 | −4.87 |
| BG074818 | 320480 | RIKEN cDNA 6430537K16 gene | 6430537K16Rik | −3.75 |
| BG075389 | 20660 | Sortilin-related receptor, LDLR class A repeats-containing | Sorl1 | −3.54 |
| BG069654 | 13476 | Receptor accessory protein 5 | Reep5 | −3.35 |
| BG073453 | 18186 | Neuropilin 1 | Nrp1 | −3.26 |
| BG077833 | 22099 | Translin | Tsn | −3.19 |
| BG066372 | 17762 | Microtubule-associated protein tau | Mapt | −3.17 |
| BG085811 | 54401 | Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, beta polypeptide | Ywhab | −3.13 |
| BG077733 | 11931 | ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, beta 1 polypeptide | Atp1b1 | −3.13 |
| BG088107 | 50781 | Dickkopf homolog 3 (Xenopus laevis) | Dkk3 | −3.13 |
| BG065461 | 70247 | Proteasome (prosome, macropain) 26S subunit, non-ATPase, 1 | Psmd1 | −3.06 |
| BG085933 | 108155 | O-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) transferase (UDP-N-acetylglucosamine:polypeptide-N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase) | Ogt | −2.89 |
| BG087831 | 16508 | Potassium voltage-gated channel, Shal-related family, member 2 | Kcnd2 | −2.86 |
| BG073378 | 21454 | T-complex protein 1 | Tcp1 | −2.76 |
| BG080731 | 17936 | Ngfi-A binding protein 1 | Nab1 | −2.72 |
| BG078404 | 238055 | Apolipoprotein B | Apob | −2.70 |
| AW558903 | 66673 | Sortilin-related VPS10 domain containing receptor 3 | Sorcs3 | −2.69 |
| BG083786 | 269252 | General transcription factor IIIC, polypeptide 4 | Gtf3c4 | −2.69 |
| BG064745 | 18655 | Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 | Pgk1 | −2.65 |
| BG078945 | 18195 | N-ethylmaleimide sensitive fusion protein | Nsf | −2.63 |
| BG067952 | 18516 | Pre B-cell leukemia transcription factor 3 | Pbx3 | −2.63 |
| BG067301 | 140904 | Calneuron 1 | Caln1 | −2.62 |
| BG076847 | 12314 | Calmodulin 2 | Calm2 | −2.59 |
| BG075191 | 231470 | Fraser syndrome 1 homolog (human) | Fras1 | −2.58 |
| BG086020 | 16499 | Potassium voltage-gated channel, shaker-related subfamily, beta member 3 | Kcnab3 | −2.54 |
| BG065113 | 12035 | Branched chain aminotransferase 1, cytosolic | Bcat1 | −2.53 |
| AW544616 | 11931 | ATPase, Na+/K+ transporting, beta 1 polypeptide | Atp1b1 | −2.53 |
| BG071667 | 70974 | Phosphoglucomutase 2-like 1 | Pgm2l1 | −2.50 |
| BG074398 | 13602 | SPARC-like 1 (mast9, hevin) | Sparcl1 | −2.50 |
| BG077573 | 14536 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 6, group A, member 1 | Nr6a1 | −2.50 |
Functional Gene Categories Regulated by Advanced Injury
Eyes with advanced injury showed many more biological processes that were significantly upregulated than those with early injury. These included immune response, cell adhesion, protein metabolism, cytoskeleton regulation, and apoptotic program (Table 8). The gene categories of ubiquitin cycle, microtubule-based process, lipid metabolism, and axon and dendrite extension were downregulated by advanced injury, in addition to energy pathways, mitochondria, and synaptic transmission, which were also downregulated in early injury (Table 9).
Table 8.
Significantly Upregulated Gene Categories Identified by DAVID Analysis in the GCL with Advanced Nerve Injury
| Gene Categories | Genes (n) | EASE Score |
|---|---|---|
| Biological Process | ||
| Protein biosynthesis | 90 | 0.0000 |
| Immune response | 39 | 0.0003 |
| Cell adhesion | 45 | 0.0008 |
| Protein metabolism | 241 | 0.0026 |
| Inorganic anion transport | 15 | 0.0026 |
| Protein kinase cascade | 26 | 0.0040 |
| Response to stress | 63 | 0.0050 |
| Cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis | 39 | 0.0220 |
| Apoptotic program | 9 | 0.0260 |
| Coagulation | 7 | 0.0270 |
| Cytoplasm organization and biogenesis | 22 | 0.0310 |
| Cell Component | ||
| Ribosome | 48 | 0.0000 |
| Extracellular region | 133 | 0.0000 |
| Extracellular matrix | 28 | 0.0002 |
| Cytoskeleton | 70 | 0.0002 |
| Contractile fiber | 8 | 0.0320 |
| Plasma membrane | 76 | 0.0340 |
| Molecular Function | ||
| Structural constituent of ribosome | 52 | 0.0000 |
| Cytoskeletal protein binding | 43 | 0.0000 |
| UDP-glycosyltransferase activity | 11 | 0.0056 |
| Transferase activity, transferring glycosyl groups | 21 | 0.0099 |
| RNA splicing factor activity, transesterification mechanism | 6 | 0.0150 |
| Enzyme regulator activity | 43 | 0.0280 |
| Insulin-like growth factor binding | 4 | 0.0350 |
| Extracellular matrix structural constituent | 9 | 0.0400 |
Table 9.
Significantly Downregulated Gene Categories Identified by DAVID Analysis in the GCL with Advanced Nerve Injury
| Gene Categories | Genes (n) | EASE Score |
|---|---|---|
| Biological Process | ||
| Generation of precursor metabolites and energy | 61 | 0.0000 |
| Oxidative phosphorylation | 17 | 0.0000 |
| Cofactor metabolism | 27 | 0.0003 |
| Monovalent inorganic cation transport | 19 | 0.0037 |
| Nucleotide biosynthesis | 16 | 0.0050 |
| Cellular carbohydrate metabolism | 24 | 0.0055 |
| Electron transport | 28 | 0.0110 |
| mRNA splice site selection | 5 | 0.0110 |
| Dendrite morphogenesis | 5 | 0.0180 |
| Ubiquitin cycle | 42 | 0.0200 |
| Tricarboxylic acid cycle | 7 | 0.0220 |
| Microtubule-based process | 17 | 0.0230 |
| Synaptic transmission | 9 | 0.0230 |
| Axon extension | 4 | 0.0330 |
| Response to heat | 5 | 0.0350 |
| Cellular lipid metabolism | 30 | 0.0370 |
| Protein catabolism | 22 | 0.0370 |
| Protein polymerization | 6 | 0.0400 |
| Cell Component | ||
| Mitochondrion | 72 | 0.0003 |
| Organelle membrane | 49 | 0.0023 |
| Proton-transporting two-sector ATPase complex | 10 | 0.0050 |
| Molecular Function | ||
| Oxidoreductase activity | 52 | 0.0001 |
| Ion transporter activity | 41 | 0.0003 |
| Hydrolase activity, acting on acid | 44 | 0.0043 |
| Anhydrides, in phosphorus-containing nucleoside-triphosphatase activity | 42 | 0.0043 |
| Lactate dehydrogenase activity | 4 | 0.0047 |
| Electron transporter activity | 20 | 0.0067 |
| NADH dehydrogenase activity | 8 | 0.0120 |
| ATPase activity, coupled to transmembrane movement of substances | 14 | 0.0330 |
| GTPase activity | 13 | 0.0200 |
| Unfolded protein binding | 17 | 0.0240 |
| Iron-sulfur cluster binding | 6 | 0.0390 |
| Heat shock protein binding | 7 | 0.0470 |
| GTP binding | 25 | 0.0500 |
Significant Genes and Gene Categories Specifically Regulated by Early Injury
A comparison of the significant genes in both injury groups identified 261 genes (120 upregulated and 141 downregulated) not present in the advanced-injury group (Supplementary Table S4, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental), approximately 50% of the early changed genes. These are considered genes specifically regulated by early injury. By DAVID analysis, several significantly changed biological processes and cell components associated with these genes were identified, including upregulation of transcription and downregulation of protein synthesis and ribosomal genes (Table 10). The analysis also identified significant changes in the insulin signaling pathway (EASE score = 0.0089), with seven altered genes in the pathway including 3-phosphoinositide dependent protein kinase-1 (Pdpk1, 2.33-fold; Supplementary Table S5, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental).
Table 10.
Gene Categories Specifically Associated with the Early Injury
| Gene Categories | Genes (n) | EASE Score |
|---|---|---|
| Up | ||
| Regulation of transcription | 19 | 0.0190 |
| Nucleus | 36 | 0.0170 |
| Down | ||
| Protein biosynthesis | 17 | 0.0000 |
| Coenzyme metabolism | 5 | 0.0220 |
| Ribosome | 11 | 0.0000 |
qPCR Analysis of Early-Injury GCL
To further identify gene expression changes in GCL and verify array results, we used qPCR to examine expressions of selected early messages identified in microarray analysis as well as a number of others that are not present on the microarrays but may be implicated in glaucomatous injury process. Since we targeted to identify the early events, the following qPCR results are focused on those of the early-injury group, while some of the advanced injury changes are also included.
Messages for Cell Type Markers
We first examined expressions of several common RGC marker proteins: POU4f1, POU4f2, and POU4f3, three members of the POU family transcription factors, as well as Thy-1 cell surface antigen (Thy1; Fig. 1A). With early injury, the only change in these messages was a significant reduction in POU4f1 (to 52% ± 7%; P < 0.01). For axonal mRNAs, the heavy and light polypeptide of neurofilament (Nefh and Nefl) appeared decreased, but the reduction was not enough to reach statistical significance. In contrast, axonal membrane protein growth associated protein 43 (Gap43) had a more than 200% increase in expression at the message level (211% ± 63%; P < 0.05).
Figure 1.
Expression of GCL cell type markers, detected by qPCR in early pressure-induced injury. (A) Among the RGC marker messages, including members of the POU transcription factor family and Thy1, only POU4f1 was significantly reduced (P < 0.01). The Axonal mRNAs Nefh and Nefl were decreased, but the reductions were not statistically significant. Gap43 was moderately upregulated (P < 0.05). (B) None of the glial activation markers, including Aif1, P2ry12, and Csf1r (for microglia); Gfap (for Müller cells and astrocytes); and Aqp4 and Vim (for astrocytes), were significantly changed in early injury. *P < 0.05, †P < 0.01.
In addition to RGC, amacrine cells are abundant in the GCL, representing approximately 50% of the neurons.28 While a universal marker for GCL amacrine cells is lacking and many amacrine subclass markers were not on our arrays,29 other markers (Caln1, Calb1, Ndrg4, Atp11a, Gas7, Dab1, and Gabra3) were not significantly affected by our array analysis. Synaptic vesicle protein, Stx1a (Hpc-1, syntaxin 1a) mRNA is produced by both amacrine and retinal ganglion cells.30 By qPCR, we found that Stx1a mRNA levels were reduced in the early-injury group (45% ± 6%; Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental).
As shown in Figure 1B, although there was some variation in levels, no significant change of mRNA expression was detected in any microglial or astrocytic marker proteins examined in the early-injury group. The former included allograft inflammatory factor (Aif1, aka IBA1), a calcium binding protein associated with microglial activation in the central nervous system (CNS), colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (Csf1r) which plays a central role in microglial activation, and purinergic receptor P2Y12 (P2ry12), an adenine nucleotide receptor which is dramatically downregulated after microglial activation. The astrocytic markers included glial fibrillary acidic protein (Gfap), an intermediate filament protein, and a common marker for active astrocyte, aquaporin 4 (Aqp4), the main water channel in the CNS, and vimentin, a marker for proliferating astrocytes. Only with the advanced injury, were most of these glial marker messages significantly changed (Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental).
Messages for Neurotrophins (NTs) and NT Receptors
Despite a lack of direct evidence, deprivation of retrograde transported NT and NT receptors has been hypothesized to result in RGC death in glaucoma. Our previous work in the whole retina suggested a more complex response of the NT system to elevated IOP.31 In GCL with early injury, the qPCR found a 262% ± 51% (P < 0.0001) and 222% ± 46% (P < 0.05) increase in brain derived neurotrophin factor (Bdnf) and NT3 (Ntf3) mRNA levels, respectively (Fig. 2). Concomitantly, TrkB (Ntrk2) was found to decrease to 49% ± 7% (P < 0.001) of control values and p75NTR(Ngfr) was reduced to 48% ±13% (P = 0.01). No significant change was found in message levels for Ngf, TrkA (Ntrk1), or TrkC (Ntrk3). NT4/5 (Ntf4) mRNA was not detected in the GCL.
Figure 2.
Expression of GCL NT and NT receptors, detected by qPCR in early pressure-induced injury by qPCR. Both BDNF and NT3 were moderately upregulated (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Concomitantly, TrkB was significantly reduced (P < 0.01) and so was p75NTR (P < 0.05). No change was found in message levels for Ngf, TrkA, and TrkC. *P < 0.05, †P < 0.01, ‡P < 0.001.
Messages for Transcription Factors
The most upregulated gene identified by microarray in early injury was Atf3 (3.4-fold, Table 2), a member of the ATF/CREB family of transcription factors that is inducible by a wide variety of stress signals and upregulated in the whole retina in both experimental glaucoma and after optic nerve transection.16,20,32 Using qPCR (with more samples), we found a much more dramatic increase in the mRNA level of Atf3 (1492% ± 949%; P < 0.01) in GCL with early injury (Fig. 3). As the nerve injury advances, Atf3 mRNA increases in a pattern linear to the injury grades (r2 = 0.25; P < 0.001). Jun family proteins and activator protein 1 (AP-1) components c-Jun and Junb, two early stress responding transcription factors that can dimerize with Atf3,33,34 showed no change at the mRNA level in the early-injury group. Signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (Stat3), another early response transcription factor commonly upregulated after nerve injury, including isolated glaucoma model RGC18 and whole retinas after optic nerve transection,35–3716,32 and shown to act together with Atf3 and cJun in damaged neurons,38 was not changed either. With advanced injury, however, c-Jun (445% ± 67%; P = 0.0001), Junb (305% ± 99%; P < 0.05), and Stat3 (304% ± 33%; P < 0.0001) mRNAs were all significantly upregulated in GCL, confirming findings in whole retinas and laser-captured RGCs.16,18 In early-injury GCL, we did not detect any change in the message level for transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1, alpha subunit (Hif1α) which mediates cellular responses to hypoxic stimuli. Also, no change was detected in the mRNA level of erythropoietin (Epo), a target gene of Hif1α and marker for hypoxia. Neither Hif1α nor Epo was increased in the advanced injury group.
Figure 3.
Expression of a group of transcription factors, detected by qPCR in early-injury GCL. A marked upregulation was found in Atf3 expression (P < 0.01) in early injury. No change was found in mRNA levels of Jun, Junb, or Stat3. Hif1α mRNA, upregulated in response to hypoxic stimuli, was not changed in early-injury GCL, nor was Epo, a target gene of Hif1α. †P < 0.01.
Messages for Bcl2 Family Members and Other Prosurvival Genes
The Bcl2 gene family has been suggested to play a critical role in RGC death in glaucoma.39 We examined the expression of three Bcl2 family genes at the transcriptional level by qPCR: the proapoptotic gene Bax and the antiapoptotic genes Bcl2 and BclxL. Message level for tumor suppressor p53 (Tp53), the Bax gene transcription factor,40 was also examined. As summarized in Figure 4A, Bcl2 appeared depressed, but this change was not statistically significant. No significant change was found in the other messages in the GCL with early injury. In the advanced-injury group, mRNA levels of Bax, Bcl2, and BclxL were not changed but Tp53 increased to 251% ± 45% of control (P = 0.0003).
Figure 4.
Expression of Bcl2 family genes and other prosurvival genes, detected by qPCR in early-injury GCL. (A) Three Bcl2 family members Bax, Bcl2, and BclxL were examined and no change was detected in Bax or BclxL in early injury. Bcl2 mRNA appears decreased but statistics showed no significant difference. Tp53, another apoptotic gene which regulates transcription of Bax, was not changed either. (B) Pdpk1, a key kinase in the PI3K pathway which promotes cell survival, was significantly upregulated in early-injury GCL (P < 0.01). In contrast, prosurvival genes Nrg1 and Dkk3 were both significantly downregulated in the early-injury group (P < 0.05 for both). Also, a marked reduction to less than half of control values was found in Gapdh mRNA (P < 0.001). *P < 0.05, †P < 0.01, ‡P < 0.001.
Our microarray analysis identified Pdpk1 as one of the significant insulin pathway genes (Table 2). Acting downstream to PI3K, Pdpk1 also mediates effects of other growth factors such as NTs to promote cell survival.41–43 Consistent with the microarray results, the qPCR analysis showed an early upregulation of Pdpk1 mRNA in GCL (to 210% ± 30% of control; P < 0.01; Fig. 4B), which returned to the control level in advanced injury. On the contrary, neuregulin 1 (Nrg1), a prosurvival gene that regulates cell–cell communication in the nervous system44,45 and is reported to be downregulated in RGCs with advanced nerve injury,18 was significantly reduced to 63% ± 8% of control values (P = 0.01) in early-injury GCL. Dkk3, one of the most downregulated early genes on microarray, was decreased (to 66% ± 9% of control values; P = 0.02), according to qPCR. The qPCR analysis also identified a significant reduction in Gapdh mRNA in early-injury GCL (to 44% ± 7%; P < 0.001).
Messages for Stress and Immune Response Genes
As shown in Figure 5, heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1), the inducible isoform of heme oxygenase responding to a variety of stress stimuli, was upregulated to 347% ± 112% (P < 0.05) in early-injury GCL. Lipocalin 2 (Lcn2) and cytokine leukemia inhibitory factor (Lif) appeared upregulated, but the increases turned out to be nonsignificant. However, both Lif and Lcn2 increased linearly to the injury grades (for Lif, r2 = 0.49, P < 0.0001; for Lcn2, r2 = 0.53, P < 0.0001) and were significantly upregulated in the advanced-injury group (Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental). In early injury, compliment component 1 q subcomponent alpha chain (C1qa) was unchanged. Tumor necrosis factor (Tnf), suggested to mediate RGC death in glaucoma,46–48 seemed to be elevated in early-injury GCL but this increase did not reach statistical significance. Interleukin 6 (IL6) mRNA was not detected in the GCL.
Figure 5.
Expression of stress and immune response genes, detected by qPCR in early-injury GCL. Stress responding gene Hmox1 was significantly upregulated at the message level in early injury (P < 0.05). Tnf, Lif, and Lcn2 all appear upregulated in the early-injury group, but these changes are not statistically significant. No change was detected in C1qa expression in early-injury GCL. *P < 0.05.
Discussion
Previously, we have analyzed the GCL with extensive nerve injury by microarray and compared these results to those of whole retinas with comparable nerve damage and found a significantly increased number of gene and gene categories with altered expression in the GCL.20 In this report, using this same method, we have focused on early injury, anticipating that we would detect early responses more specific to RGCs. With this minimal pressure-induced injury (average nerve grading = 1.5) and thus limited extent of affected retina, mild responses could be overlooked even by targeting GCL. But by the same token, those identified to be significant are much more likely to be of even greater importance. As shown in the results, our microarray analysis identified a total of 532 such significant genes in early injury, approximately 3.5% of the total genes studied. These significant genes are associated with a wide variety of biological processes and multiple cell components. This suggests that significant GCL gene responses and possibly functional changes have already occurred, while IOP-induced optic nerve damage is rather limited (<25% degenerating axons). As far as we are aware, this is the first report in which patterns of GCL gene expression changes are examined in early pressure-induced injury. The exceptionally large sample sizes in both the microarray and qPCR analyses allowed us to perform effective statistical analysis of biological variations and obtain reliable results.
Although hundreds of significant genes with altered expression were identified in early injury, we did not find supportive evidence for extensive RGC loss at this level of injury. By qPCR, no significant change was found in the mRNA levels for the RGC marker proteins POU4f family members and Thy1, except for a selective decrease in POU4f1. The significance of this selective decrease is not clear, but it may represent some specific gene downregulation, rather than loss of a particular subset of cells considering the substantial overlapping expression of POU4f1, POU4f2, and POU4f3 in RGCs.49 In addition, members of the Bcl2 gene family, including Bcl2, BclxL, and Bax, which play important roles regulating RGC death in glaucoma,39 were not changed at the message level. Neither was Tp53, another apoptotic gene which has been associated with RGC death.50 Overall, cell apoptosis was not detected as a significant gene category in early injury by microarray, suggesting that it is not a prominent process. As anticipated, it stands out as one of the significantly upregulated biological processes in advanced injury (Table 8).
In addition, our qPCR results found no upregulation of glial cell marker expression in early injury (Fig. 1B), suggesting that glial activation is not yet widespread. Immune response, considered evidence for glial activation and identified as one component of early changes in glaucomatous injury in whole retinas with induced elevated IOP,12,16 was only identified in advanced-injury GCL in our microarray analysis, suggesting that it is probably a later event in GCL. This notion was further confirmed by qPCR, showing no change in messages for C1qa, Cp, Lcn2, and Timp1 in early injury (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table S6, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental). These seemingly contrary results may be attributed to distinct methods of elevated IOP induction as well as the differences in the tissues analyzed between the studies. The IL6 type cytokine genes (including IL6, Lif, CNTF), which play an important role in regulation of glial cell activities through Jak-Stat pathways and have previously been found to be upregulated in the early optic nerve head injury (Dyck JA, et al. IOVS 2008;49:ARVO E-Abstract 3684; Johnson EC, et al. IOVS 2009;50:ARVO E-Abstract 2750) were not changed either. In agreement with a previous study,51 we also found relatively little obvious effect on amacrine cells, which comprise approximately 50% of GCL neurons, since nearly all the amacrine subclass markers on our arrays were unchanged in these early-injury tissues. While Stx1a, the one possible exception to this, was significantly downregulated, it is reported to be produced by RGCs as well as amacrine cells.30 Although the relative lack of change in these specific cell messages could be a reflection of the limited amount of involved retina in early injury, our findings, taken together, indicate that the gene expression changes in early-injury GCL are more representative of those specifically occurring in RGCs and may indicate corresponding functional changes in these cells.
Studies using hypertonic saline injection52 and limbal laser photocoagulation16 rat models of induced glaucoma as well as the genetic model in DBA/2J mice9 have suggested the downregulation of certain RGC genes occurs while the cells are still viable but responding to axonal injury in the optic nerve. In our microarray analysis, the number of downregulated genes in early injury is slightly more than that of upregulated ones (307 vs. 225). Since there was no extensive RGC loss in the early-injury specimens, this downregulation is more likely a reflection of specific changes in GCL gene expression than a result of cell loss. Interestingly, a much greater variety of functional gene classes were changed in the direction of downregulation in early injury compared with those that were upregulated. As revealed by DAVID analysis, only one functional class of metabolism regulation was associated with the upregulated genes (Table 4). In strong contrast, a total of 12 functional gene classes including energy pathways, glycolysis, protein metabolism, and synaptic transmission were downregulated (Table 5). This result appears to suggest that a general suppression in cellular functions dominates the early responses of RGCs and may reflect the degenerative nature of glaucomatous injury.
One striking feature of the gene expression changes in early injury is the absolute domination of downregulated processes that are associated with cellular metabolism. The most downregulated biological process, identified by DAVID analysis, was the generation of precursor metabolites and energy (energy pathways). Among other significantly downregulated processes, five are associated with energy production, including glycolysis, the TCA cycle, oxidative phosphorylation, electron transport, and ATP synthesis. Accordingly, mitochondrion, the major site for energy production, was the most affected cell component. This confirms affected mitochondrial function previously reported in retinas of a mouse model of glaucoma53 and supports the possible link between mitochondrial dysfunction and pathogenesis of glaucoma.54,55 Accompanying the downregulated energy production is a decrease in protein synthesis, which is unique to the early injury and possibly secondary to reduced energy production. Gapdh, a major glycolytic enzyme with diverse functions, such as apoptosis induction,56,57 is significantly reduced at the message level in early injury by both microarray and qPCR. In another study using the same rat model of glaucoma, Gapdh protein was shown to be oxidatively modified in RGCs with 12 weeks of IOP elevation and approximately 90% axon loss in the optic nerve.58 Since glucose is the major energy source for neurons,59 the reduced production of energy is likely an indication of reduced glucose uptake in these cells. It is noteworthy that one of the processes uniquely affected by early injury is altered insulin pathway, which controls a set of metabolic enzymes that regulate glucose uptake. The homeostasis of both glucose and protein is essential for normal function and survival of neurons, and its disruption could be highly detrimental. In fact, the reduced glucose uptake and the early decrease in protein synthesis are consistent with the metabolic changes observed in other types of neurons before they undergo apoptosis.60–62
One potential explanation of these metabolic changes could be deprivation of retrograde transported NT and NT receptors that are hypothesized to cause RGC death in glaucoma.63–65 In neurons, which are deprived of growth factors and eventually committed to apoptosis, similar changes in metabolic parameters have been reported.66 However, it is not clear yet whether the metabolic changes themselves act as a trigger of apoptosis or just represent an early common pathway as part of the apoptotic program. In our previous study of the whole retina,31 no significant changes were found in the mRNA levels for any of the NT family members at any level of injury, except for a reduction in TrkB and TrkC messages in those with rather extensive nerve damage. In contrast, our analysis of the GCL, with its improved sensitivity in detecting specific GCL changes, found an increase in message levels for both BDNF and NT3 and a decrease in TrkB message (to approximately 50% of normal level) in early injury. The increase in the endogenous production of BDNF and NT3 could represent a compensatory response to lack of neurotrophic support in GCL. A similar upregulation has been observed in the GCL after optic nerve transection.67 This response, together with upregulation of Pdpk1 which is required for BDNF-mediated neuronal survival,43 may represent an endogenous protective mechanism. If TrkB downregulation implies decreased production of TrkB receptor protein, then the effect of such mechanisms as well as RGC-salvaging strategies such as supplementing BDNF alone, could be limited and ultimately ineffective. Moreover, exogenous BDNF has been shown to downregulate retinal expression of TrkB receptor,68 further limiting its effectiveness especially in long-term RGC rescue. In whole retinas, we have shown increased p75NTR mRNA in both mild and more advanced injury.20 Interestingly, in early-injury GCL, the p75NTR mRNA level was greatly reduced (to ∼50% of the normal level). While retinal p75NTR is primarily expressed in Müller cells,69–71 whether it is present in adult RGCs remains controversial. Our results in the GCL seem to be consistent with those studies that have reported expression of p75NTR in adult RGCs,72–75 and we have attributed the contradictory results in whole retinas and GCL to the difference in source materials and thus in the activities of distinct cell populations.
With advanced injury, the energy production pathways continue to decrease while the protein synthesis and ribosome genes became the most upregulated classes. The increased protein synthesis is consistent with previous reports in whole retina.16 This may not be surprising, since apoptosis, an active process that requires expression of certain genes, has become significantly active by this point. In our microarray analysis of GCL from eyes with 7-day nerve transection (data not shown) in which apoptosis is an active on-going process, we found similar changes including upregulated ribosomal genes and protein synthesis but downregulated glucose metabolism. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that increased protein synthesis represents activities of GCL cell populations other than RGCs, especially in those with extensive injury and active tissue remodeling.
The most upregulated gene in early-injury GCL was the transcription factor Atf3. This increase of Atf3 mRNA (1492% by qPCR) confirms the previous findings16,20 and further establishes Atf3 upregulation as one of the earliest responses in glaucomatous injury. Responding specifically to cellular injury,76,77 Atf3 has been proposed as a possible indicator of nerve injury, especially in sensory neurons.77–80 In this case, Atf3 expression would be expected to occur specifically in injured RGCs. Our previous immunohistochemistry study showed that this increase is associated with presumably RGC nuclei in the GCL.20 These findings lead to speculation that, in our model of glaucoma, the Atf3 induction could represent a response of RGC somata to axonal injury at the optic nerve head. This idea is consistent with the notion that the optic nerve head is the initial injury site in glaucoma and the axonal damage signals secondary changes in RGC somata. The upregulation of Gap43, a marker protein of axonal regeneration whose expression also increases in response to nerve injury,81,82 was observed in early injury, further supporting this hypothesis.
The biological role of Atf3 is not clear, and whether its effects are protective or detrimental in glaucomatous injury remains an unanswered question. In general, Atf3 plays a pleiotropic role in determining cell fate in stress response, depending on the cellular context.34,83 However, Atf3 is known to repress transcription as a homodimer and activate as a heterodimer.83 It has been proposed to play a central role in regulating stress response by interacting with other transcription factors and thus mediating the transcription of multiple genes, which is required in cell responses to injury or stress.84 The comparison of the two injury groups in our analysis showed upregulated transcription to be a specific component of the early response. When overexpressed in the liver of mice, Atf3 has been shown to reduce expression of genes encoding gluconeogenic enzymes,85,86 providing one potential explanation for the disruption of glucose homeostasis observed in our study. Also, Atf3 has been demonstrated to repress expression of the cytokine IL684 which has been shown to be upregulated in neurons after injury.87–89 This finding may explain the undetectable message level of IL6 in the GCL. Taken together, these intriguing data suggest that Atf3 may play a key role in regulating early RGC responses to axonal injury in glaucoma. Its specific roles and physiological significance in glaucomatous injury deserve further investigation.
Induction of Hmox1, another stress-response gene, also known as heat shock protein 32, has been considered a general response to cellular stress, since it responds to a broad spectrum of stress stimuli.90,91 Increased Hmox1 protein has been shown in RGCs exposed to hydrostatic pressure in vitro as well as mouse retinas exposed to acute elevated IOP.92 Among the most common stress signals that induce Hmox1 expression is oxidative stress, which has been suggested to play a role in signaling RGC death in glaucoma.93 In our microarray analysis, the downregulation of gene classes associated with mitochondrial functions, oxidative phosphorylation, electron transport, and oxidoreductase activity in early injury suggests that the presence of oxidative stress is highly possible in the GCL as an early event and may have led to increased expression of Hmox1. This oxidative stress does not seem to result from hypoxia, but from the lack of transcriptional response of Hif1α and Epo. Because of the generality of Hmox1 induction, stress signals other than oxidative stress may play a role as well. Regardless, there is overwhelming evidence that Hmox1 confers cytoprotective and antiapoptotic effects via its metabolic products, including iron, ferritin, and carbon monoxide,90,91 suggesting a potential neuroprotective role for Hmox1 in early injury of glaucoma.
There have been several studies of whole retinal responses shortly after optic nerve transection or crush.16,32,94 Agudo et al.94 found more than a thousand genes that are commonly regulated within a week of either crush or transection, with apoptosis as the most significant cluster. Among these, they identified Lcn2 and Stat3 as genes significantly and consistently upregulated, similar to our findings in early glaucoma model injury. Templeton et al.,32 studying early retinal responses after optic nerve crush, found approximately 700 significantly affected genes at 2 and 5 days postlesion. While nearly half of these were on our arrays, only 34 were significantly affected in early glaucoma injury. Approximately two thirds of these, including Stat3 and Atf3, were changed in the same direction by nerve crush. Yang et al.16 compared early retinal responses produced by transection and by modeling glaucoma using limbal laser photocoagulation. Of the genes they identified as regulated in at least one of these injuries, 40 were regulated in our early-injury group. Of the 21 genes found by Yang et al. to be regulated by glaucoma only or by both glaucoma and transaction, 13 were similarly regulated in our early-injury group, including upregulation of Hmox1, Stat3, Igfr1, Atf3, and Lcn2. We also found that 10 of the 19 genes identified as regulated by transection only were similarly regulated in the glaucoma model of early injury in our study. Since all these studies were of whole retina, it is difficult to interpret the significance of differences between them and the present study, in which we concentrated only on the GCL.
In addition to the above, Dieterich et al.95 used RNA from the inner retina collected at 1 week after crush by combining en face sectioning of retinal wholemounts with subtractive hybridization to illustrate that three upregulated genes, Ftl1, Klc1, and Csda, could be identified. These three were also found to be upregulated in our study, but only in the advanced injury group (Supplementary Table S3, http://www.iovs.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5930/-/DCSupplemental).
In summary, our microarray and qPCR analyses of gene expressions indicate that overall GCL gene responses were rather subtle in eyes with mild pressure-induced optic nerve injury in our rat glaucoma model. However, these expression changes, dominated by an extensive downregulation of genes associated with glucose metabolism and protein synthesis, reflect the degenerative nature of glaucoma injury and are important in understanding the cellular mechanisms underlying RGC injury and death. The findings suggest impaired RGC functions and profound metabolic changes in these cells in early glaucomatous injury, possibly in response to the axonal damage in the optic nerve head. As one of the most upregulated genes, transcription factor Atf3 may play a key regulatory role in the early injury, and unraveling its biological functions in RGCs may advance our knowledge of pathogenesis and progression of glaucoma.
Footnotes
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants EY01014 and EY016866 and an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
Disclosure: Y. Guo, None; E.C. Johnson, None; W.O. Cepurna, None; J.A. Dyck, None; T. Doser, None; J.C. Morrison, None
References
- 1. AGIS-Investigators The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:429–440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Schulzer M, Alward WL, Feldman F, et al. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998:487–497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lebrun-Julien F, Di Polo A. Molecular and cell-based approaches for neuroprotection in glaucoma. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:417–424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Weber A, Harman CD, Viswanathan S. Effects of optic nerve injury, glaucoma, and neuroprotection on the survival, structure, and function of ganglion cells in the mammalian retina. J Physiol. 2008;586:4393–4400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Buckingham BP, Inman DM, Lambert W, et al. Progressive ganglion cell degeneration precedes neuronal loss in a mouse model of glaucoma. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2735–2744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Howell GR, Libby RT, Jakobs TC, et al. Axons of retinal ganglion cells are insulted in the optic nerve early in DBA/2J glaucoma. J Cell Biol. 2007;179:1523–1537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR, Maumenee AE. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma: II, the site of injury and susceptibility to damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:635–649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Jakobs TC, Libby RT, Ben Y, John SW, Masland RH. Retinal ganglion cell degeneration is topological but not cell type specific in DBA/2J mice. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:313–325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Soto I, Oglesby E, Buckingham BP, et al. Retinal ganglion cells downregulate gene expression and lose their axons within the optic nerve head in a mouse glaucoma model. J Neurosci. 2008;28:548–561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Weber AJ, Kaufman PL, Hubbard WC. Morphology of single ganglion cells in the glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:2304–2320 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Libby RT, Li Y, Savinova OV, et al. Susceptibility to neurodegeneration in a glaucoma is modified by Bax gene dosage. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:17–26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ahmed F, Brown KM, Stephan DA, Morrison JC, Johnson EC, Tomarev SI. Microarray analysis of changes in mRNA levels in the rat retina after experimental elevation of intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1247–1258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Miyahara T, Kikuchi T, Akimoto M, Kurokawa T, Shibuki H, Yoshimura N. Gene microarray analysis of experimental glaucomatous retina from cynomolgus monkey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4347–4356 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Naskar R, Thanos S. Retinal gene profiling in a hereditary rodent model of elevated intraocular pressure. Mol Vis. 2006;12:1199–1210 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Steele MR, Inman DM, Calkins DJ, Horner PJ, Vetter ML. Microarray analysis of retinal gene expression in the DBA/2J model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:977–985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Yang Z, Quigley HA, Pease ME, et al. Changes in gene expression in experimental glaucoma and optic nerve transection: the equilibrium between protective and detrimental mechanisms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5539–5548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Panagis L, Zhao X, Ge Y, Ren L, Mittag TW, Danias J. Gene expression changes in areas of focal loss of retinal ganglion cells in the retina of DBA/2J mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2024–2034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wang D, Ray A, Rodgers K, et al. Global gene expression changes in rat retinal ganglion cells in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51;4084–4095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Morrison JC, Moore CG, Deppmeier LM, Gold BG, Meshul CK, Johnson EC. A rat model of chronic pressure-induced optic nerve damage. Exp Eye Res. 1997;64:85–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Guo Y, Cepurna WO, Dyck J, Doser T, Johnson EC, Morrison JC. Retinal cell responses to elevated intraocular pressure: a gene array comparison between the whole retina and retinal ganglion cell layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3003–3018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Morrison JC, Johnson EC, Cepurna W, Jia L. Understanding mechanisms of pressure-induced optic nerve damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:217–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, et al. Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Li Y, Semaan SJ, Schlamp CL, Nickells RW. Dominant inheritance of retinal ganglion cell resistance to optic nerve crush in mice. BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hackam AS. The Wnt signaling pathway in retinal degenerations. IUBMB Life. 2005;57:381–388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nakamura RE, Hunter DD, Yi H, Brunken WJ, Hackam AS. Identification of two novel activities of the Wnt signaling regulator Dickkopf 3 and characterization of its expression in the mouse retina. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Niehrs C. Function and biological roles of the Dickkopf family of Wnt modulators. Oncogene. 2006;25:7469–7481 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kim CY, Kuehn MH, Clark AF, Kwon YH. Gene expression profile of the adult human retinal ganglion cell layer. Mol Vis. 2006;12:1640–1648 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Perry VH, Henderson Z, Linden R. Postnatal changes in retinal ganglion cell and optic axon populations in the pigmented rat. J Comp Neurol. 1983;219:356–368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Cherry TJ, Trimarchi JM, Stadler MB, Cepko CL. Development and diversification of retinal amacrine interneurons at single cell resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9495–9500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Inoue A, Akagawa K. Neuron specific expression of a membrane protein, HPC-1: tissue distribution, and cellular and subcellular localization of immunoreactivity and mRNA. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1993;19:121–128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Guo Y, Johnson E, Cepurna W, Jia L, Dyck J, Morrison JC. Does elevated intraocular pressure reduce retinal TRKB-mediated survival signaling in experimental glaucoma? Exp Eye Res. 2009;89:921–933 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Templeton JP, Nassr M, Vazquez-Chona F, et al. Differential response of C57BL/6J mouse and DBA/2J mouse to optic nerve crush. BMC Neurosci. 2009;10:90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hai T, Curran T. Cross-family dimerization of transcription factors Fos/Jun and ATF/CREB alters DNA binding specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:3720–3724 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Hai T, Hartman MG. The molecular biology and nomenclature of the activating transcription factor/cAMP responsive element binding family of transcription factors: activating transcription factor proteins and homeostasis. Gene. 2001;273:1–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Dziennis S, Alkayed NJ. Role of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 in neuronal survival and regeneration. Rev Neurosci. 2008;19:341–361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Haas CA, Hofmann HD, Kirsch M. Expression of CNTF/LIF-receptor components and activation of STAT3 signaling in axotomized facial motoneurons: evidence for a sequential postlesional function of the cytokines. J Neurobiol. 1999;41:559–571 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kirsch M, Terheggen U, Hofmann HD. Ciliary neurotrophic factor is an early lesion-induced retrograde signal for axotomized facial motoneurons. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2003;24:130–138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Kiryu-Seo S, Kato R, Ogawa T, Nakagomi S, Nagata K, Kiyama H. Neuronal injury-inducible gene is synergistically regulated by ATF3, c-Jun, and STAT3 through the interaction with Sp1 in damaged neurons. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:6988–6996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Nickells RW, Semaan SJ, Schlamp CL. Involvement of the Bcl2 gene family in the signaling and control of retinal ganglion cell death. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:423–435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Miyashita T, Krajewski S, Krajewska M, et al. Tumor suppressor p53 is a regulator of bcl-2 and bax gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene. 1994;9:1799–1805 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bayascas JR. Dissecting the role of the 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) signalling pathways. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:2978–2982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Duronio V. The life of a cell: apoptosis regulation by the PI3K/PKB pathway. Biochem J. 2008;415:333–344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kharebava G, Makonchuk D, Kalita KB, Zheng JJ, Hetman M. Requirement of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 for BDNF-mediated neuronal survival. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11409–11420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Britsch S. The neuregulin-I/ErbB signaling system in development and disease. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2007;190:1–65 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Falls DL. Neuregulins: functions, forms, and signaling strategies. Exp Cell Res. 2003;284:14–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Nakazawa T, Nakazawa C, Matsubara A, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediates oligodendrocyte death and delayed retinal ganglion cell loss in a mouse model of glaucoma. J Neurosci. 2006;26:12633–12641 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sawada H, Fukuchi T, Tanaka T, Abe H. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations in the aqueous humor of patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;51:903–906 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tezel G. TNF-alpha signaling in glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Prog Brain Res. 2008;173:409–421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Xiang M, Zhou L, Macke JP, et al. The Brn-3 family of POU-domain factors: primary structure, binding specificity, and expression in subsets of retinal ganglion cells and somatosensory neurons. J Neurosci. 1995;15:4762–4785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Nickells RW. Apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells in glaucoma: an update of the molecular pathways involved in cell death. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;43(suppl 1):S151–S161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Kielczewski JL, Pease ME, Quigley HA. The effect of experimental glaucoma and optic nerve transection on amacrine cells in the rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3188–3196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Schlamp CL, Johnson EC, Li Y, Morrison JC, Nickells RW. Changes in Thy1 gene expression associated with damaged retinal ganglion cells. Mol Vis. 2001;7:192–201 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Walsh MM, Yi H, Friedman J, et al. Gene and protein expression pilot profiling and biomarkers in an experimental mouse model of hypertensive glaucoma. Exp Biol Med (Maywood, NJ). 2009;234:918–930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Abu-Amero KK, Morales J, Bosley TM. Mitochondrial abnormalities in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:2533–2541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Kong GY, Van Bergen NJ, Trounce IA, Crowston JG. Mitochondrial dysfunction and glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:93–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Chen RW, Saunders PA, Wei H, Li Z, Seth P, Chuang DM. Involvement of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and p53 in neuronal apoptosis: evidence that GAPDH is upregulated by p53. J Neurosci. 1999;19:9654–9662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sawa A, Khan AA, Hester LD, Snyder SH. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase: nuclear translocation participates in neuronal and nonneuronal cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:11669–11674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Tezel G, Yang X, Cai J. Proteomic identification of oxidatively modified retinal proteins in a chronic pressure-induced rat model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3177–3187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Erecinska M, Silver IA. ATP and brain function. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1989;9:2–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Miller TM, Johnson EM., Jr Metabolic and genetic analyses of apoptosis in potassium/serum-deprived rat cerebellar granule cells. J Neurosci. 1996;16:7487–7495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Miller TM, Moulder KL, Knudson CM, et al. Bax deletion further orders the cell death pathway in cerebellar granule cells and suggests a caspase-independent pathway to cell death. J Cell Biol. 1997;139:205–217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Nardi N, Avidan G, Daily D, Zilkha-Falb R, Barzilai A. Biochemical and temporal analysis of events associated with apoptosis induced by lowering the extracellular potassium concentration in mouse cerebellar granule neurons. J Neurochem. 1997;68:750–759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Pease ME, McKinnon SJ, Quigley HA, Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Zack DJ. Obstructed axonal transport of BDNF and its receptor TrkB in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:764–774 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Quigley HA. Ganglion cell death in glaucoma: pathology recapitulates ontogeny. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1995;23:85–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Quigley HA, McKinnon SJ, Zack DJ, et al. Retrograde axonal transport of BDNF in retinal ganglion cells is blocked by acute IOP elevation in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3460–3466 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Deckwerth TL, Johnson EM., Jr Temporal analysis of events associated with programmed cell death (apoptosis) of sympathetic neurons deprived of nerve growth factor. J Cell Biol. 1993;123:1207–1222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Gao H, Qiao X, Hefti F, Hollyfield JG, Knusel B. Elevated mRNA expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in retinal ganglion cell layer after optic nerve injury. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:1840–1847 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Chen H, Weber AJ. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduces TrkB protein and mRNA in the normal retina and following optic nerve crush in adult rats. Brain Res. 2004;1011:99–106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Hu B, Yip HK, So KF. Localization of p75 neurotrophin receptor in the retina of the adult SD rat: an immunocytochemical study at light and electron microscopic levels. Glia. 1998;24:187–197 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Hu B, Yip HK, So KF. Expression of p75 neurotrophin receptor in the injured and regenerating rat retina. Neuroreport. 1999;10:1293–1297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Xu F, Wei Y, Lu Q, et al. Immunohistochemical localization of sortilin and p75(NTR) in normal and ischemic rat retina. Neurosci Lett. 2009;454:81–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Butowt R, von Bartheld CS. Anterograde axonal transport of BDNF and NT-3 by retinal ganglion cells: roles of neurotrophin receptors. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;29:11–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Carmignoto G, Comelli MC, Candeo P, et al. Expression of NGF receptor and NGF receptor mRNA in the developing and adult rat retina. Exp Neurol. 1991;111:302–311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Garcia M, Forster V, Hicks D, Vecino E. In vivo expression of neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors is conserved in adult porcine retina in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4532–4541 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Suzuki A, Nomura S, Morii E, Fukuda Y, Kosaka J. Localization of mRNAs for trkB isoforms and p75 in rat retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci Res. 1998;54:27–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Chen BP, Wolfgang CD, Hai T. Analysis of ATF3, a transcription factor induced by physiological stresses and modulated by gadd153/Chop10. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:1157–1168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Tsujino H, Kondo E, Fukuoka T, et al. Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) induction by axotomy in sensory and motoneurons: a novel neuronal marker of nerve injury. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2000;15:170–182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Averill S, Michael GJ, Shortland PJ, et al. NGF and GDNF ameliorate the increase in ATF3 expression which occurs in dorsal root ganglion cells in response to peripheral nerve injury. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19:1437–1445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Takeda M, Kato H, Takamiya A, Yoshida A, Kiyama H. Injury-specific expression of activating transcription factor-3 in retinal ganglion cells and its colocalized expression with phosphorylated c-Jun. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2412–2421 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Tsuzuki K, Kondo E, Fukuoka T, et al. Differential regulation of P2X(3) mRNA expression by peripheral nerve injury in intact and injured neurons in the rat sensory ganglia. Pain. 2001;91:351–360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Skene JH. Axonal growth-associated proteins. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:127–156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Skene JH, Willard M. Axonally transported proteins associated with axon growth in rabbit central and peripheral nervous systems. J Cell Biol. 1981;89:96–103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Hai T, Wolfgang CD, Marsee DK, Allen AE, Sivaprasad U. ATF3 and stress responses. Gene Expr. 1999;7:321–335 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Gilchrist M, Thorsson V, Li B, et al. Systems biology approaches identify ATF3 as a negative regulator of Toll-like receptor 4. Nature. 2006;441:173–178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Allen-Jennings AE, Hartman MG, Kociba GJ, Hai T. The roles of ATF3 in glucose homeostasis: a transgenic mouse model with liver dysfunction and defects in endocrine pancreas. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:29507–29514 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Allen-Jennings AE, Hartman MG, Kociba GJ, Hai T. The roles of ATF3 in liver dysfunction and the regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:20020–20025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Cafferty WB, Gardiner NJ, Das P, Qiu J, McMahon SB, Thompson SW. Conditioning injury-induced spinal axon regeneration fails in interleukin-6 knock-out mice. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4432–4443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Cao Z, Gao Y, Bryson JB, et al. The cytokine interleukin-6 is sufficient but not necessary to mimic the peripheral conditioning lesion effect on axonal growth. J Neurosci. 2006;26:5565–5573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Murphy PG, Grondin J, Altares M, Richardson PM. Induction of interleukin-6 in axotomized sensory neurons. J Neurosci. 1995;15:5130–5138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Ryter SW, Alam J, Choi AM. Heme oxygenase-1/carbon monoxide: from basic science to therapeutic applications. Physiol Rev. 2006;86:583–650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Ryter SW, Otterbein LE, Morse D, Choi AM. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide signaling pathways: regulation and functional significance. Mol Cell Biochem. 2002;234–235:249–263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Liu Q, Ju WK, Crowston JG, et al. Oxidative stress is an early event in hydrostatic pressure induced retinal ganglion cell damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4580–4589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Tezel G. Oxidative stress in glaucomatous neurodegeneration: mechanisms and consequences. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2006;25:490–513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Agudo M, Perez-Marin MC, Lonngren U, et al. Time course profiling of the retinal transcriptome after optic nerve transection and optic nerve crush. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1050–1063 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Dieterich DC, Bockers TM, Gundelfinger ED, Kreutz MR. Screening for differentially expressed genes in the rat inner retina and optic nerve after optic nerve crush. Neurosci Lett. 2002;317:29–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





