Skip to main content
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 2011 May 4;30(9):1673–1675. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.107

Unlocking SOAR releases STIM

Joo Young Kim 1, Shmuel Muallem 2,a
PMCID: PMC3101985  PMID: 21540881

Abstract

EMBO J 30 9, 1678–1689 (2011); published online March 22 2011

A crucial component of the receptor-evoked Ca2+ signal is Ca2+ influx mediated by the store-operated Ca2+ channels (SOCs). The molecular makeup of one SOC is the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ sensor STIM1 and the pore-forming Orai1. Ca2+ release from the ER leads to co-clustering of STIM1 and Orai1 to activate Orai1. The short STIM1 SOAR/CAD domain (STIM1 Orai1-activating region/CRAC-activating domain), which has two coiled-coil (C–C) domains, interacts with the Orai1 C terminus C–C domain to activate the channel. How the function of SOAR is regulated is not known. Korzeniowski et al (2010) and Muik et al (2011; this issue) now identified an autoinhibitory domain in STIM1 that occludes SOAR. Release of SOAR involves a conformational transition that is aided by the Orai1 C–C domain.


The receptor-evoked Ca2+ signal initiates with Ca2+ release from internal stores and is followed by activation of Ca2+ influx by the store-operated channels (SOCs), which is required for sustaining the Ca2+ signal and thus all Ca2+-dependent functions (Parekh and Putney, 2005). The molecular makeup of the SOCs was revealed with the discovery of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ sensor STIM1 (Liou et al, 2005; Roos et al, 2005) and the Orais (Hogan et al, 2010). Since then, rapid progress was made in defining the domains and function of STIM1 and Orai1. STIM1 has a single transmembrane span with an N-terminus EF hand and SAM domain that reside in the ER lumen. The STIM1 cytoplasmic C terminus contains three coiled-coil (C–C) domains (CC1, CC2 and CC3), with CC2 and CC3 residing within SOAR/CAD that fully activate the Orais (Park et al, 2009; Yuan et al, 2009), an S/P domain and a polybasic domain (Figure 1A). Orai1 is a four transmembrane-span protein that assembles into a tetramer to form the channel pore (Hogan et al, 2010).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The STIM1 domains (A) and potential activation mechanism of Orai1 by SOAR (B, C). (A) C–C, coiled-coil; CMD, CRAC modulatory domain; EF, EF hand; ERM, Ezrin/radixin/moesin; K, lysine-rich domain; SAM, sterile α-motif; SOAR, STIM1 Orai1-activating region; S/P, proline-, serine-rich segment; TM, transmembrane. Also shown are the acidic glutamate (residues 318–322) and basic lysine (residues 382–386) patches. (B) CC2 and CC3 are folded with CC1, and the interaction is stabilized by hydrophobic (grey star) and electrostatic interactions. STIM1(485–685) may (?) also participate in stabilizing the occluded SOAR state (blue domain). (C) The interaction of CC2 and CC3 with CC1 occludes SOAR. Ca2+ release from the ER clusters STIM1 in a microdomain with Orai1 to facilitate interaction of the folded STIM1 C–C domains with Orai1 C terminus. This releases SOAR that activates Orai1 to initiate Ca2+ influx.

STIM1 is obligatory for Orai1 functioning. Ca2+ store depletion and dissociation from the EF hand leads to assembly of STIM1 into multimers that cluster with Orai1 to form Ca2+ influx units. Domain analysis revealed that the Orai1 C terminus likely folds into a C–C and disruption of the C–C prevents activation of Orai1 by STIM1 (Muik et al, 2008). Although STIM1 C terminus can activate Orai1 (Huang et al, 2006), the 100-residue SOAR/CAD is all that is needed to fully activate Orais (Park et al, 2009; Yuan et al, 2009). Moreover, SOAR/CAD is more effective than STIM1 C terminus in activating Orai1 (Korzeniowski et al, 2010). The SOAR/CAD domain encompasses CC2 and CC3 of STIM1 (Figure 1A) and interacts with the C (Park et al, 2009; Yuan et al, 2009) and N terminus (Park et al, 2009) of Orai1 to activate the channel. Disruption of Orai1 C–C domain prevents interaction with and activation of Orai1 by SOAR (Yuan et al, 2009).

The finding that SOAR activates Orai1 better than STIM1 C terminus raised the possibility that SOAR is occluded in STIM1, and it has to be released by a conformational transition to activate Orai1. Two recent independent studies by Korzeniowski et al (2010) and Muik et al (2011) addressed this possibility in two different approaches and arrived at a similar conclusion.

The study by Korzeniowski et al (2010) reported that STIM1 fragments that include SOAR and STIM1 CC1 were less active than SOAR in activating Orai1. They noticed that the STIM1 CC1 contains an acidic patch while SOAR has a basic patch (Figure 1B), and the CC1 acidic patch has spacing similar to an acidic patch in the C terminus of Orai1. This lead to the hypothesis of occlusion of SOAR by the STIM1 CC1 and competition between CC1 and Orai1 acidic patches for interaction with SOAR. Dissociation of the CC1/SOAR is needed for interaction of SOAR with Orai1 C terminus and activation of the channel. Accordingly, neutralization of the CC1 acidic patch resulted in constitutively active STIM1 and STIM1 fragments that included CC1, while neutralization of the SOAR basic patch resulted in inactive STIM1 and fragments. Significantly, targeting STIM1(238–343) containing only the CC1 acidic patch to the plasma membrane inhibited activation of Orai1 by STIM1 fragments (Korzeniowski et al, 2010). Korzeniowski et al concluded that, in the resting state, SOAR is occluded by electrostatic interaction between the CC1 acidic patch and the SOAR basic patch, and activation of Orai1 by STIM1 requires release of SOAR (Figure 1B).

How the occluded SOAR might be released and whether a conformational transition is involved was directly addressed by Muik et al (2011) using the STIM1 conformational sensor YFP-OASF-CFP. Intramolecular interaction resulted in compact folding of YFP-OASF-CFP and strong FRET. As interaction of C–C domains is stabilized by hydrophobic interactions, Muik et al inserted mutations that disrupt the C–C domains and/or hydrophobic interactions in YFP-OASF-CFP. The mutants reduced YFP-OASF-CFP FRET, altered the CD spectra and increased the mobility of OASF, indicating extended conformation. Most notably, plasma membrane Orai1 with intact C–C domain facilitated transition of YFP-OASF-CFP to the extended conformation and bound better to YFP-OASF-CFP mutants with extended conformation. They conclude that hydrophobic interactions between CC1 and SOAR occlude SOAR, and release of SOAR is facilitated by interaction of CC1 with Orai1 C–C domain (Figure 1C).

A twist in the theme may be provided by a recent study examining the expression and function of STIM1(1–485) (Yu et al, 2011). Cytoplasmic STIM1 constructs that terminate at residue 485 are constitutively active (Yuan et al, 2009) and STIM1(1–463) retains some constitutive activity (Korzeniowski et al, 2010). The activity of STIM1(1–485) could not be assayed directly as it remains in the ER, where it traps Orai1, suggesting that the SOAR domain of STIM1(1–485) is in the unoccluded state. Remarkably, fusing mCherry or GFP to the C terminus of STIM1(1–485) rescued its trafficking and the occluded SOAR state (Yu et al, 2011), suggesting that the C terminus end of STIM1 participates in SOAR occlusion (blue domain in Figure 1B).

The combined findings lead to the model in Figure 1C. In the resting state, the STIM1 EF hand is bound with Ca2+ to maintain STIM1 in unclustered state. The STIM1 C–C domains are in compact fold, with CC1 interacting with CC2 and CC3 hydrophobically and electrostatically. Ca2+ release from the ER leads to clustering of STIM1 and co-clustering with Orai1 to allow access of the Orai1 C–C domain to the folded CC1–SOAR. The Orai1 C–C domain can now effectively compete with STIM1 CC1 to unwind the STIM1 C–C domain fold, release and bind SOAR and activate Orai1 and Ca2+ influx. Such an arrangement may serve to ensure tight coupling of Ca2+ influx to Ca2+ release so that only when STIM1 and Orai1 are co-clustered will SOAR be in the unoccluded state. This can also reduce Ca2+ leak in the face of the large inward Ca2+ gradient.

The autoinhibitory mechanism of STIM1 by CC1, discovered by Korzeniowski et al (2010) and Muik et al (2011; this issue), adds considerably to the mechanism by which STIM1 activity and Ca2+ influx are regulated. We now need to understand the molecular mechanism by which Ca2+ store depletion and receptor stimulation releases SOAR and the exact role of Orai1 in SOAR release. Other open questions are the role of STIM1 C terminus end in this regulation and whether other STIM1 domains participate in the regulation, as may be suggested by the reduced FRET of N and C terminally extended YFP-OASF-CFP.

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hogan PG, Lewis RS, Rao A (2010) Molecular basis of calcium signaling in lymphocytes: STIM and ORAI. Annu Rev Immunol 28: 491–533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Huang GN, Zeng W, Kim JY, Yuan JP, Han L, Muallem S, Worley PF (2006) STIM1 carboxyl-terminus activates native SOC, I(crac) and TRPC1 channels. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1003–1010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Korzeniowski MK, Manjarres IM, Varnai P, Balla T (2010) Activation of STIM1-Orai1 involves an intramolecular switching mechanism. Sci Signal 3: ra82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Liou J, Kim ML, Heo WD, Jones JT, Myers JW, Ferrell JE Jr, Meyer T (2005) STIM is a Ca2+ sensor essential for Ca2+-store-depletion-triggered Ca2+ influx. Curr Biol 15: 1235–1241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Muik M, Frischauf I, Derler I, Fahrner M, Bergsmann J, Eder P, Schindl R, Hesch C, Polzinger B, Fritsch R, Kahr H, Madl J, Gruber H, Groschner K, Romanin C (2008) Dynamic coupling of the putative coiled-coil domain of ORAI1 with STIM1 mediates ORAI1 channel activation. J Biol Chem 283: 8014–8022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Muik M, Fahrner M, Schindl R, Stathopulos P, Frischauf I, Derler I, Plenk P, Lackner B, Groschner K, Ikura M, Romanin C (2011) STIM1 couples to ORAI1 via an intramolecular transition into an extended conformation. EMBO J 30: 1678–1689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Parekh AB, Putney JW Jr (2005) Store-operated calcium channels. Physiol Rev 85: 757–810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Park CY, Hoover PJ, Mullins FM, Bachhawat P, Covington ED, Raunser S, Walz T, Garcia KC, Dolmetsch RE, Lewis RS (2009) STIM1 clusters and activates CRAC channels via direct binding of a cytosolic domain to Orai1. Cell 136: 876–890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Roos J, DiGregorio PJ, Yeromin AV, Ohlsen K, Lioudyno M, Zhang S, Safrina O, Kozak JA, Wagner SL, Cahalan MD, Velicelebi G, Stauderman KA (2005) STIM1, an essential and conserved component of store-operated Ca2+ channel function. J Cell Biol 169: 435–445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yu F, Sun L, Courjaret R, Machaca K (2011) Role of the STIM1 C-terminal Domain in STIM1 Clustering. J Biol Chem 286: 8375–8384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yuan JP, Zeng W, Dorwart MR, Choi YJ, Worley PF, Muallem S (2009) SOAR and the polybasic STIM1 domains gate and regulate Orai channels. Nat Cell Biol 11: 337–343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES